Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Total Hip Arthroplasty - Revision with Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Total Hip Arthroplasty - Revision with Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy

Surgical technique guide for revision total hip arthroplasty with an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy - the posterior approach and ETO exposure step by step, fragment blood-supply preservation, cement removal, cable fixation, stem selection by Paprosky grade, and protected weight-bearing rehabilitation. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
28
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Posterior (Moore/Southern) approach with an anterolateral ETO extended distally along the femoral shaft · advanced

ETOThe exposure that unlocks the canal
PosteriorThe approach
LCFA perforatorsThe blood supply you must protect
~180 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Indications for an ETO: a well-fixed cemented stem (the commonest, around 60 percent of cases), a well-fixed uncemented stem, a retained cement mantle, periprosthetic fracture Vancouver B1/B2, proximal femoral deformity limiting canal access, and severe proximal osteolysis. The advantage over cortical windows is DIRECT visualisation of the cement-bone interface - blind removal perforates the femur in about 30 percent of cases.
  • ETO geometry (the CUBE rule): 8-12 cm long, it MUST extend 4-5 cm beyond the existing stem tip; one-third of the femoral circumference wide (3-4 cm); three cuts - an anterior vertical full-thickness cut, a distal horizontal full-thickness cut, and a posterior vertical-oblique PARTIAL-thickness cut that leaves the posterior soft-tissue hinge intact.
  • Blood supply: perforating branches of the lateral circumflex femoral artery run through the POSTERIOR one-third of vastus lateralis (main pedicle 8-10 cm distal to the greater trochanter). Elevate only the anterior two-thirds of vastus - preserve the posterior third or you devascularise the fragment and non-union rises from 5-10 percent to 20-30 percent.
  • Cable fixation: a minimum of 3 cables (typically 4-5), each tensioned to 30-40 kg to create compression across the osteotomy - one proximal, two or three across the osteotomy, one distal.
  • The revision stem must bypass the distal end of the ETO by 2 cortical diameters (about 10 cm) to avoid a periprosthetic fracture at the stress riser, and protected weight-bearing until union (around 6-8 weeks) is mandatory.

When & Why


Indication. An Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) is performed during a revision total hip arthroplasty whenever you need DIRECT, controlled access to the femoral canal - most often to remove a well-fixed stem or a long cement mantle that cannot be extracted safely through a closed canal. It converts a blind, dangerous extraction into an open, visualised one. Primary indications - Well-fixed cemented stem requiring removal - the commonest indication (about 60 percent of ETOs). The stem is bonded to a long cement mantle and cannot be extracted safely; the ETO exposes the cement-bone interface for complete removal under vision (blind removal through cortical windows perforates the anterior cortex in about 30 percent of cases).

  • Well-fixed uncemented stem requiring removal - an extensively porous-coated or hydroxyapatite-coated stem with circumferential bone ingrowth that will not come out with osteotomes or a slap hammer and would fracture the femur if forced.
  • Periprosthetic femoral fracture (Vancouver B1/B2) - Vancouver B1 (fracture around a well-fixed stem) and B2 (fracture around a loose stem) both need access for reduction and fixation; an ETO allows stem extraction and fracture management through the same exposure.
  • Proximal femoral deformity limiting canal access - previous fracture malunion, Paget's disease, a previous femoral osteotomy, or developmental dysplasia, where the canal cannot be reamed in a controlled line.
  • Severe proximal femoral osteolysis - extensive cysts from polyethylene wear debris needing thorough debridement and grafting. Relative indications include a retained cement restrictor or distal plug that blocks instruments, broken cerclage wires embedded in bone, a severe anterior femoral bow risking anterior perforation during reaming, and removal of a long distally-fixed stem. Contraindications. Absolute: active uncontrolled infection with soft-tissue loss (fragment contamination), severe osteoporosis (the fragment will not hold cables), a prior non-union of an ETO at the same site (use plate fixation instead), and destruction of the trochanteric area by tumour or infection (no fragment to mobilise). Relative: mild osteoporosis, anticipated non-compliance with protected weight-bearing, smoking (threefold non-union risk - counsel cessation and consider plate augmentation), previous femoral irradiation, and morbid obesity.
Extended trochanteric osteotomy
Advantages
Direct visualisation, complete cement removal, controlled osteotomy, union over 90 percent
Disadvantages
Longer surgery, protected weight-bearing 6-8 weeks, non-union 5-10 percent
Best for
Well-fixed cemented stem, extensive cement mantle, complex anatomy
Cortical window
Advantages
Faster, full weight-bearing immediately
Disadvantages
Blind cement removal (30 percent perforation), incomplete removal, fracture propagation
Best for
Short cement mantle, proximal cement only, good bone stock
Complete femoral osteotomy
Advantages
Complete exposure
Disadvantages
Non-union 20-30 percent, needs plate fixation, long protected weight-bearing
Best for
Severe deformity, tumour resection
In-situ stem retention
Advantages
No osteotomy
Disadvantages
Cannot address the cement or canal
Best for
Well-fixed stem, isolated acetabular revision
ETO versus other femoral exposure techniques
TechniqueAdvantagesDisadvantagesBest for
Extended trochanteric osteotomyDirect visualisation, complete cement removal, controlled osteotomy, union over 90 percentLonger surgery, protected weight-bearing 6-8 weeks, non-union 5-10 percentWell-fixed cemented stem, extensive cement mantle, complex anatomy
Cortical windowFaster, full weight-bearing immediatelyBlind cement removal (30 percent perforation), incomplete removal, fracture propagationShort cement mantle, proximal cement only, good bone stock
Complete femoral osteotomyComplete exposureNon-union 20-30 percent, needs plate fixation, long protected weight-bearingSevere deformity, tumour resection
In-situ stem retentionNo osteotomyCannot address the cement or canalWell-fixed stem, isolated acetabular revision

Preoperative planning. Full-length AP and lateral femur radiographs (hip to knee on one cassette) are mandatory. Measure the existing stem from shoulder to tip; the ETO must extend 4-5 cm beyond the tip, giving a typical total ETO length of 8-12 cm from the greater trochanter. Mark the stem tip and the planned distal osteotomy cut on the film. Assess the distal bone stock and canal diameter to assign a Paprosky femoral grade (defined in Background and Evidence), which dictates the revision stem. Order the cement-removal equipment (an ultrasonic system such as OSCAR, or a high-speed burr with long carbide bits, and curved osteotomes) and 5-7 cerclage cables with a tensioner. Exclude infection in every revision. ESR greater than 30 mm/hr or CRP greater than 10 mg/L raises suspicion (combined sensitivity around 95 percent); aspirate if there is any concern - a synovial WBC count greater than 3000 cells per microlitre or PMN greater than 80 percent is diagnostic. Consent. Counsel specifically on the ETO-related risks: non-union 5-10 percent, trochanteric escape 2-5 percent, intraoperative fracture 5-10 percent, sciatic nerve injury 0.5-2 percent, infection 2-5 percent, dislocation 5-10 percent, subsidence 5-10 percent, and chronic pain 10-15 percent; and on the mandatory 6-8 week protected weight-bearing protocol. Typical operative time is 3-4 hours with 800-1200 mL blood loss (cross-match 4 units). Optimise smoking cessation (at least 4 weeks preop), nutrition (albumin greater than 3.5 g/dL), diabetes (HbA1c less than 7 percent), and anaemia before listing.

The Operation


The goal is to expose the femur through the posterior approach, elevate the anterior two-thirds of vastus lateralis while PRESERVING the posterior third (the fragment's blood supply), create a controlled anterolateral osteotomy that hinges open on that intact posterior sleeve, remove the stem and all cement under direct vision, ream and insert a revision stem that bypasses the ETO by 10 cm, then reduce the fragment and compress it with cerclage cables. The exposure and osteotomy are the whole operation - laid out step by step below.

AP hip radiograph of a revision THA through an extended trochanteric osteotomy
AP hip radiograph of a revision total hip replacement through an extended trochanteric osteotomy, the long femoral stem bypassing the osteotomy with the femur reconstituted by cerclage cables.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position and setup
  • Lateral decubitus, operative side up, on a bean-bag or hip positioner with the pelvis perpendicular to the table (verify with C-arm or goniometer - it governs component version).
  • Anterior support at the pubic symphysis and posterior support at the sacrum prevent pelvic rotation.
  • Pad every bony prominence - fibular head (common peroneal nerve), malleoli, dependent knee and hip - and place an axillary roll 5-8 cm below the axilla to protect the brachial plexus.
  • Operative leg slightly flexed at the hip and knee, abducted 10-15 degrees; pillow between the knees.
Step 2Incision and superficial dissection
  • Use the previous posterior scar if present. Otherwise start about 5 cm proximal to the greater trochanter tip, centred over its posterior aspect, and curve distally along the anterolateral thigh for 18-25 cm - long enough to expose the whole planned ETO.
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue with meticulous haemostasis at each layer.
  • Split the fascia lata longitudinally in line with the femur, extending the distal limb 10-12 cm beyond the greater trochanter along the anterolateral femur.
  • Split gluteus maximus bluntly in the line of its fibres from the trochanter proximally for 5-7 cm; the sciatic nerve stays posterior to this split.
Step 3Vastus lateralis elevation - PRESERVE THE POSTERIOR THIRD (critical blood supply)
  • Identify vastus lateralis on the lateral femur and incise its fascia along the anterior border.
  • Elevate only the anterior two-thirds of vastus lateralis off the lateral femur, working proximal-to-distal on bone with a Cobb elevator.
  • Leave the posterior one-third attached to bone and periosteum - it carries the perforating branches of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (main pedicle 8-10 cm distal to the greater trochanter) and IS the fragment's blood supply.
  • Mark the posterior limit of elevation with diathermy so you do not cross it during the osteotomy cuts. Retract the elevated vastus anteriorly.
Step 4Mark the ETO
  • Using the preoperative template, mark an anterolateral rectangle on the femur: 8-12 cm long, extending 4-5 cm beyond the existing stem tip, and one-third of the circumference wide (about 3-4 cm).
  • Round the corners with a pencil-tip burr to avoid stress risers.
  • Mark three cuts: an anterior vertical cut, a distal horizontal cut, and a posterior vertical-oblique cut. The posterior cut must stay anterior to the linea aspera to spare the perforating branches of the profunda femoris.
Step 5Anterior vertical cut (full thickness)
  • With an oscillating saw, make the anterior vertical cut full thickness through both cortices, from the greater trochanter distally for the planned length.
Step 6Distal horizontal cut (full thickness)
  • Connect the distal end of the anterior cut to the posterior limb with a full-thickness horizontal cut, again rounded at the corners.
Step 7Posterior vertical-oblique cut (PARTIAL thickness - the hinge)
  • Make the posterior vertical-oblique cut only PARTIAL thickness. This is the hinge: completing it fully would detach the fragment and destroy its blood supply.
  • The intact posterior cortex plus the vastus lateralis posterior third and periosteum form the soft-tissue hinge the fragment swings open on.
Step 8Hinge the fragment open
  • Place an osteotome in the anterior cut and gently lever the anterolateral fragment open anteriorly, hinging on the intact posterior soft-tissue sleeve, like opening a book.
  • The canal, the stem and the cement mantle are now fully exposed under direct vision.
Step 9Stem extraction
  • Disengage the femoral head and divide the stem if needed (a Gigli saw can section a stem).
  • Extract the stem with the chosen extraction system; with the fragment hinged open, extraction is controlled and visible rather than blind.
Step 10Cement removal under direct vision
  • Remove the cement mantle completely under vision - an ultrasonic system (OSCAR) disrupts the cement-bone interface without cutting bone, or use a high-speed burr with long carbide bits and curved osteotomes.
  • Keep a finger on the anterior cortex to monitor its integrity and guard against perforation - the femoral vessels lie 2-3 cm medial to the anterior cortex at mid-shaft.
  • Clear the cement restrictor and any distal plug.
Step 11Canal preparation and reaming
  • Ream the diaphysis with flexible reamers, following the anterior bow and aiming for 4-6 cm of diaphyseal scratch-fit for an extensively coated stem (or a wedging taper for a modular fluted stem).
  • Avoid over-reaming - maintain cortical contact so the stem grips.
Step 12Trial and stem insertion
  • Trial the stem to restore offset and leg length and to set version (slight anteversion, 10-15 degrees).
  • Insert the definitive stem. It MUST bypass the distal end of the ETO by 2 cortical diameters (about 10 cm) to prevent a periprosthetic fracture at the stress riser, and achieve the planned scratch-fit.
Step 13Reduce the ETO and cable fixation
  • Reduce the fragment anatomically - no gap, no step.
  • Apply a minimum of 3 cerclage cables (typically 4-5): one proximal to the osteotomy, two or three across the osteotomy spaced 2-3 cm apart, and one distal. Tension each to 30-40 kg to compress the interface (compression drives union, exactly as in a fracture). Add washers or a cable-plate in osteoporotic bone.
Step 14Hip reduction and closure
  • Reduce the hip and check stability, leg length and range of motion; revise component version or head size if unstable.
  • Repair the capsule and short external rotators to the greater trochanter, close the fascia lata in layers over a drain, and apply a sterile dressing.
Step 15Imaging and surveillance
  • Intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm stem position, ETO reduction and cable position, and that no fracture has occurred.
  • Postoperative AP pelvis, lateral hip and full-length AP femur radiographs as a baseline, repeated at 2, 6 and 12 weeks to assess union.
The posterior third of vastus lateralis is the fragment's blood supply

Before any osteotomy cut, elevate only the anterior two-thirds of vastus lateralis and leave the posterior third attached to bone and periosteum. The perforating branches of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (main pedicle 8-10 cm distal to the greater trochanter) run in that posterior third. Complete vastus stripping devascularises the fragment and lifts non-union from 5-10 percent to 20-30 percent. The posterior vertical-oblique cut is PARTIAL thickness for the same reason - it preserves the hinge and the blood supply.

Sciatic nerve - identify and protect

Identify the sciatic nerve early in the posterior approach; it lies 2-3 cm posterior to the posterior acetabulum. Retract gently with a blunt retractor, release the short external rotators sharply off bone (not by avulsion), keep the posterior osteotomy cut anterior to the linea aspera, and avoid over-lengthening the leg by more than 2 cm. Injury (0.5-2 percent) typically affects the common peroneal division - foot drop.

Why ETO, not cortical windows

The ETO gives direct visualisation of the cement-bone interface for complete cement removal under vision; blind removal through a cortical window or down a closed canal carries a substantially higher femoral perforation and retained-cement risk (around 30 percent perforation). That visualisation advantage - not speed - is the principal reason ETO has replaced cortical windows for well-fixed cemented stems.

Cable tension - too much is as bad as too little

Tension each cable to 30-40 kg. More than 50 kg cheese-wires through osteoporotic bone; less than 20 kg fails to compress the interface and lifts non-union. Individualise cable number and tension to bone quality rather than maximising both.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation - phased protected weight-bearing (MANDATORY until union) | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing | Focus | |-------|--------|----------------|-------| | 1 | 0-6 weeks | Toe-touch or 20 kg partial with a walker | ETO healing, hip precautions, DVT prophylaxis; ankle pumps, quad and glute sets, gentle ROM within precautions | | 2 | 6-12 weeks | Advance per radiograph: 50 percent at 6 weeks if callus, full by 12 weeks | Confirm union (bridging callus on 3 of 4 cortices); progress crutch then cane; add abductor strengthening | | 3 | 3-6 months | Full, once union confirmed | Restore abductor strength and gait; low-impact cardio (bike, swim) | | 4 | 6-12 months and beyond | Full, maintenance | Lifelong avoidance of high-impact activity (running, contact sport, heavy lifting over 50 lb) | Hip precautions (6 weeks, posterior approach): no flexion past 90 degrees, no adduction past the midline, no internal rotation, and never the combined flexion-adduction-internal rotation that dislocates posteriorly. Use a raised toilet seat, reacher, and slip-on shoes; no driving until off opioids and full weight-bearing (around 3 months). Radiographic surveillance. X-ray at 2 weeks (wound, component position), 6 weeks (early callus - advance weight-bearing if bridging on 2 or more cortices, otherwise continue protection and repeat at 8-10 weeks), and 12 weeks (union equals bridging callus on 3 of 4 cortices, no lucency - advance to full weight-bearing). Then 6 months, 1 year, and annually to 5 years; every 2 years thereafter if stable. Union is mean 6-8 weeks (up to 12). Obtain a CT if union is doubtful. Red flags - contact urgently: sudden pain and inability to bear weight (fracture or dislocation), fever or wound drainage (infection), progressive pain despite compliance (loosening, infection, non-union), and new foot drop (sciatic nerve).

ETO non-union (5-10 percent)
Recognition
Persistent lateral thigh pain, Trendelenburg gait, no bridging callus at 12 weeks, lucency at the osteotomy, fragment motion; CT confirms no bridging bone
Prevention
Anatomic reduction, minimum 3 cables at 30-40 kg compression, protected weight-bearing 6-8 weeks, smoking cessation (threefold risk), plate augmentation in high-risk bone
Management
Asymptomatic and stable - observe. Symptomatic - revision ORIF with an 8-10 hole lateral compression plate (at least 3 bicortical screws each side), bone graft, consider BMP-7; 80-90 percent union
Trochanteric escape or migration (2-5 percent)
Recognition
Fragment migrates proximally, cables cheese-wire through bone without bone contact, palpable trochanteric prominence, abductor weakness, positive Trendelenburg
Prevention
Avoid over-tensioning cables in osteoporotic bone (25-30 kg), use washers, plate augmentation (Dall-Miles) in severe osteoporosis, optimise bone quality preop
Management
Migration under 1 cm and asymptomatic - observe. Over 1 cm or symptomatic weakness - revision plate fixation, cable augmentation with washers, trochanteric advancement, abductor rehab
Intraoperative fracture (5-10 percent)
Recognition
Audible crack, visible fracture line beyond the ETO, unstable femur, fluoroscopy shows fracture distal to the planned ETO
Prevention
Complete all cuts before levering, adequate ETO length (4-5 cm beyond stem tip), gentle hinging, prophylactic cables in severe osteoporosis
Management
Extend the osteotomy if just beyond the distal cut; if significantly distal add 2-3 cerclage cables, ensure the stem bypasses by 2 cortical diameters, consider strut allograft, extend protected weight-bearing to 12 weeks
Stem subsidence (5-10 percent)
Recognition
Progressive distal stem migration on serial films (measure lesser trochanter to stem shoulder); more than 5 mm in 6 months is failure, under 2 mm is acceptable settling
Prevention
Adequate distal fixation (4 cm scratch-fit for extensively coated stems, 0.5-1 mm undersize press-fit), avoid over-reaming, fill the canal 80-90 percent, modular tapered stem for Paprosky IIIB
Management
Under 5 mm and stable - observe. Over 5 mm or progressive - revise to a longer stem with better distal fixation, consider strut allograft; rule out infection
Dislocation (5-10 percent in revision)
Recognition
Sudden give-way, severe pain, leg shortened and rotated (posterior: adducted, internally rotated); radiograph confirms the head out of the socket
Prevention
Larger heads (36-40 mm), dual mobility in high-risk, combined anteversion 25-45 degrees, posterior soft-tissue repair, avoid over-lengthening over 2 cm, hip precautions
Management
First dislocation - closed reduction under sedation, abduction brace 6 weeks, CT to find the cause. Recurrent (2 or more) - revision: larger head or dual mobility, revise malpositioned components, soft-tissue reconstruction, constrained liner last resort
Sciatic nerve injury (0.5-2 percent)
Recognition
Foot drop (common peroneal division), weak plantar flexion, numb posterior calf and lateral foot; may appear delayed over 2-5 days from haematoma
Prevention
Early identification, gentle blunt retraction (under 15 min), sharp release of short external rotators, posterior cut anterior to linea aspera, avoid over-lengthening over 2 cm
Management
Intraop - release tension, remove retractors. Postop - EMG at 3 weeks, AFO for foot drop, physiotherapy; most neuropraxias recover over 12-18 months; explore only if complete palsy with no improvement at 3-4 months
Infection (2-5 percent)
Recognition
Acute (under 3 months): drainage, erythema, fever, raised WBC, ESR, CRP. Chronic: persistent pain, sinus tract, loosening, aspiration WBC over 3000 or PMN over 80 percent
Prevention
Screen and treat remote infections, optimise nutrition and glucose, IV antibiotic within 60 min, normothermia, copious irrigation, iodine-impregnated drapes, 24-hour antibiotics only
Management
Acute - DAIR if under 3 weeks and sensitive (50-70 percent success). Otherwise two-stage revision (spacer, 6 weeks IV antibiotics, reimplantation); chronic two-stage 85-90 percent success
Heterotopic ossification (20-30 percent radiographic, 10 percent symptomatic)
Recognition
Decreasing range of motion at 6-12 weeks, pain at end range, palpable mass; radiograph shows bone in soft tissues (Brooker I to IV)
Prevention
High-risk patients (revision, prior HO, ankylosing spondylitis, DISH): indomethacin 75 mg daily for 6 weeks OR single-fraction radiation 700 cGy within 72 hours
Management
Asymptomatic - observe. Symptomatic - wait 12-18 months for maturation then excise with prophylaxis (80 percent success with prophylaxis, 50 percent recurrence without)
Periprosthetic fracture at the ETO (2-3 percent)
Recognition
Acute trauma: sudden pain, deformity, unable to bear weight. Stress: progressive pain over weeks
Prevention
Stem bypasses the ETO by 2 cortical diameters (10 cm), protected weight-bearing until union, adequate cables, fall prevention
Management
Apply Vancouver classification: A or B1 (stem stable) ORIF with cables or plate; B2 (stem loose) revise to a longer stem plus plate; C (distal to stem) ORIF with plate. Most need plate fixation; protected weight-bearing 12 weeks
Vascular injury (under 1 percent)
Recognition
Massive bleeding not controlled by packing, expanding haematoma, dropping pressure, haemoglobin drop over 4 g/dL, distal ischaemia
Prevention
Limit the osteotomy to the lateral third of the circumference, finger-protection anteriorly during cement removal, perpendicular burring, direct visualisation with the ETO
Management
Immediate pressure and resuscitation, urgent vascular surgery, primary repair or interposition graft for the femoral artery, ligation tolerated for perforating branches; completion angiogram, consider fasciotomy if ischaemia over 4 hours
Chronic pain (10-15 percent)
Recognition
Persistent pain beyond 6 months despite radiographic union; lateral thigh (ETO site), groin (stem), or neuropathic
Prevention
Minimise trauma, achieve union, optimise component position and leg length, set realistic expectations, multimodal analgesia
Management
Rule out treatable causes (infection, loosening, non-union, impingement, referred spine). If no structural cause - multimodal pain management, neuropathic agents, steroid injection for trochanteric bursitis; revise only for a clear structural abnormality
Complications - recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
ETO non-union (5-10 percent)Persistent lateral thigh pain, Trendelenburg gait, no bridging callus at 12 weeks, lucency at the osteotomy, fragment motion; CT confirms no bridging boneAnatomic reduction, minimum 3 cables at 30-40 kg compression, protected weight-bearing 6-8 weeks, smoking cessation (threefold risk), plate augmentation in high-risk boneAsymptomatic and stable - observe. Symptomatic - revision ORIF with an 8-10 hole lateral compression plate (at least 3 bicortical screws each side), bone graft, consider BMP-7; 80-90 percent union
Trochanteric escape or migration (2-5 percent)Fragment migrates proximally, cables cheese-wire through bone without bone contact, palpable trochanteric prominence, abductor weakness, positive TrendelenburgAvoid over-tensioning cables in osteoporotic bone (25-30 kg), use washers, plate augmentation (Dall-Miles) in severe osteoporosis, optimise bone quality preopMigration under 1 cm and asymptomatic - observe. Over 1 cm or symptomatic weakness - revision plate fixation, cable augmentation with washers, trochanteric advancement, abductor rehab
Intraoperative fracture (5-10 percent)Audible crack, visible fracture line beyond the ETO, unstable femur, fluoroscopy shows fracture distal to the planned ETOComplete all cuts before levering, adequate ETO length (4-5 cm beyond stem tip), gentle hinging, prophylactic cables in severe osteoporosisExtend the osteotomy if just beyond the distal cut; if significantly distal add 2-3 cerclage cables, ensure the stem bypasses by 2 cortical diameters, consider strut allograft, extend protected weight-bearing to 12 weeks
Stem subsidence (5-10 percent)Progressive distal stem migration on serial films (measure lesser trochanter to stem shoulder); more than 5 mm in 6 months is failure, under 2 mm is acceptable settlingAdequate distal fixation (4 cm scratch-fit for extensively coated stems, 0.5-1 mm undersize press-fit), avoid over-reaming, fill the canal 80-90 percent, modular tapered stem for Paprosky IIIBUnder 5 mm and stable - observe. Over 5 mm or progressive - revise to a longer stem with better distal fixation, consider strut allograft; rule out infection
Dislocation (5-10 percent in revision)Sudden give-way, severe pain, leg shortened and rotated (posterior: adducted, internally rotated); radiograph confirms the head out of the socketLarger heads (36-40 mm), dual mobility in high-risk, combined anteversion 25-45 degrees, posterior soft-tissue repair, avoid over-lengthening over 2 cm, hip precautionsFirst dislocation - closed reduction under sedation, abduction brace 6 weeks, CT to find the cause. Recurrent (2 or more) - revision: larger head or dual mobility, revise malpositioned components, soft-tissue reconstruction, constrained liner last resort
Sciatic nerve injury (0.5-2 percent)Foot drop (common peroneal division), weak plantar flexion, numb posterior calf and lateral foot; may appear delayed over 2-5 days from haematomaEarly identification, gentle blunt retraction (under 15 min), sharp release of short external rotators, posterior cut anterior to linea aspera, avoid over-lengthening over 2 cmIntraop - release tension, remove retractors. Postop - EMG at 3 weeks, AFO for foot drop, physiotherapy; most neuropraxias recover over 12-18 months; explore only if complete palsy with no improvement at 3-4 months
Infection (2-5 percent)Acute (under 3 months): drainage, erythema, fever, raised WBC, ESR, CRP. Chronic: persistent pain, sinus tract, loosening, aspiration WBC over 3000 or PMN over 80 percentScreen and treat remote infections, optimise nutrition and glucose, IV antibiotic within 60 min, normothermia, copious irrigation, iodine-impregnated drapes, 24-hour antibiotics onlyAcute - DAIR if under 3 weeks and sensitive (50-70 percent success). Otherwise two-stage revision (spacer, 6 weeks IV antibiotics, reimplantation); chronic two-stage 85-90 percent success
Heterotopic ossification (20-30 percent radiographic, 10 percent symptomatic)Decreasing range of motion at 6-12 weeks, pain at end range, palpable mass; radiograph shows bone in soft tissues (Brooker I to IV)High-risk patients (revision, prior HO, ankylosing spondylitis, DISH): indomethacin 75 mg daily for 6 weeks OR single-fraction radiation 700 cGy within 72 hoursAsymptomatic - observe. Symptomatic - wait 12-18 months for maturation then excise with prophylaxis (80 percent success with prophylaxis, 50 percent recurrence without)
Periprosthetic fracture at the ETO (2-3 percent)Acute trauma: sudden pain, deformity, unable to bear weight. Stress: progressive pain over weeksStem bypasses the ETO by 2 cortical diameters (10 cm), protected weight-bearing until union, adequate cables, fall preventionApply Vancouver classification: A or B1 (stem stable) ORIF with cables or plate; B2 (stem loose) revise to a longer stem plus plate; C (distal to stem) ORIF with plate. Most need plate fixation; protected weight-bearing 12 weeks
Vascular injury (under 1 percent)Massive bleeding not controlled by packing, expanding haematoma, dropping pressure, haemoglobin drop over 4 g/dL, distal ischaemiaLimit the osteotomy to the lateral third of the circumference, finger-protection anteriorly during cement removal, perpendicular burring, direct visualisation with the ETOImmediate pressure and resuscitation, urgent vascular surgery, primary repair or interposition graft for the femoral artery, ligation tolerated for perforating branches; completion angiogram, consider fasciotomy if ischaemia over 4 hours
Chronic pain (10-15 percent)Persistent pain beyond 6 months despite radiographic union; lateral thigh (ETO site), groin (stem), or neuropathicMinimise trauma, achieve union, optimise component position and leg length, set realistic expectations, multimodal analgesiaRule out treatable causes (infection, loosening, non-union, impingement, referred spine). If no structural cause - multimodal pain management, neuropathic agents, steroid injection for trochanteric bursitis; revise only for a clear structural abnormality

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

CUBE 3-3-3ETO GEOMETRY - the CUBE 3-3-3 rule

C
Cuts equal 3 surfaces
Three osteotomy cuts - anterior vertical (full thickness), distal horizontal (full thickness), posterior vertical-oblique (PARTIAL thickness, the hinge). Never complete all three fully; keep the posterior soft-tissue hinge
U
Union needs 3 or more cables
Minimum 3 cables (typically 4-5): 1 proximal, 2-3 across the osteotomy, 1 distal, each tensioned 30-40 kg for compression
B
Beyond the stem tip by 3-5 cm
The ETO must extend 4-5 cm beyond the existing stem tip to prevent fracture propagation during extraction; typical total length 8-12 cm
E
Extended - 3 times a standard slide
A standard trochanteric slide is 3-5 cm; an ETO is 8-12 cm, giving access to the cement mantle and stem beyond the proximal metaphysis
3
3 cm equals one-third circumference width
ETO width 3-4 cm, about one-third of the femoral circumference; more than one-third destabilises, less gives inadequate exposure
3
3 months maximum to full union
Union typically 6-8 weeks, up to 12; defined as bridging callus on 3 of 4 cortices. Protected weight-bearing until union
3
3 times the non-union risk if smoking
Smoking triples non-union risk (from 5-10 percent to 15-30 percent); other risks: osteoporosis, infection, inadequate fixation, early full weight-bearing
Mnemonic

VAST PEDICLEETO BLOOD SUPPLY - VAST PEDICLE

V
Vastus lateralis posterior one-third
The posterior third of vastus lateralis MUST stay attached to the fragment - it is the vascular pedicle. Elevate only the anterior two-thirds
A
Artery equals lateral circumflex femoral
The LCFA gives perforating branches that pierce vastus lateralis from deep to superficial along its posterior third
S
Superior gluteal artery to the GT
Superior gluteal artery branches supply gluteus medius and minimus attached to the greater trochanter portion - secondary supply
T
Ten centimetres distal to the GT
The main LCFA perforator pedicle lies 8-10 cm distal to the greater trochanter tip - the critical preservation zone
P
Periosteum maintained posteriorly
The posterior periosteum and soft-tissue hinge add blood supply and mechanical stability
E
Elevate only anterior two-thirds
Technical key: lift only the anterior two-thirds of vastus off the femur, leaving the posterior third with its perforators
D
Devascularisation if violated
Complete vastus stripping raises non-union from 5-10 percent to 20-30 percent and may necrose the fragment
I
Intact soft tissue equals high union
An intact posterior pedicle gives robust supply and over 90 percent union with proper technique
C
Circumflex branches multiple
Multiple perforators along the femur - distributed supply, not a single vessel, so reliable
L
Lateral approach preserves it
The posterior approach with an anterolateral ETO naturally preserves the posterior pedicle; an anterior approach would violate it
E
Essential for 90 percent union
Vascular preservation is essential for the reported over-90-percent union rate; without it non-union doubles

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“Describe the blood supply to the ETO fragment, how you preserve it, and what happens if you violate it.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 68-year-old smoker presents 8 weeks after an ETO with persistent lateral thigh pain and a positive Trendelenburg test. Radiographs show no bridging callus and a 2 mm lucency at the osteotomy. How do you manage this?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“You are planning an ETO for a well-fixed cemented stem 150 mm long. Walk me through your preoperative planning for ETO geometry and stem selection, and what stem for a Paprosky Type IIIA defect?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Revision THA with ETO - exam-day essentials

Primary indications

  • Well-fixed cemented stem (about 60 percent) - direct cement visualisation versus 30 percent perforation with cortical windows
  • Well-fixed uncemented stem with bone ingrowth
  • Periprosthetic fracture Vancouver B1/B2
  • Proximal femoral deformity limiting canal access
  • Severe proximal osteolysis needing debridement and grafting

ETO geometry (CUBE 3-3-3)

  • Length 8-12 cm, MUST extend 4-5 cm beyond the stem tip
  • Width one-third circumference (3-4 cm)
  • Three cuts: anterior vertical and distal horizontal full-thickness, posterior vertical-oblique PARTIAL thickness (the hinge)
  • Posterior cut stays anterior to the linea aspera
  • Posterior hinge (vastus posterior third plus periosteum) carries the blood supply

Blood supply (VAST PEDICLE)

  • Primary: LCFA perforators through the posterior third of vastus, main pedicle 8-10 cm distal to the GT
  • Secondary: superior gluteal artery to the abductors on the GT
  • Elevate only the anterior two-thirds of vastus; preserve the posterior third and periosteum
  • Violation raises non-union from 5-10 percent to 20-30 percent
  • Union over 90 percent with preservation, anatomic reduction, cable compression, protected weight-bearing 6-8 weeks

Cable fixation

  • Minimum 3 cables (18-gauge), typically 4-5 in revision
  • Positions: 1 proximal, 2-3 across the osteotomy 2-3 cm apart, 1 distal
  • Tension 30-40 kg per cable for compression
  • Over 50 kg cheese-wires osteoporotic bone; under 20 kg under-compresses
  • Plate augmentation (Dall-Miles) in osteoporosis, infection, or revision ETO

Paprosky grade and stem selection

  • IIIA (good diaphysis, more than 4 cm fixation): extensively porous-coated cylindrical stem (Wagner, Solution, Restoration), 4 cm scratch-fit
  • IIIB (poor diaphysis, less than 4 cm): modular tapered fluted stem (Reclaim, Arcos, MP)
  • IV (non-supportive widened canal): APC, megaprosthesis, or custom implant
  • Stem MUST bypass the ETO by 2 cortical diameters (10 cm)
  • Uncemented diaphyseal-fixation stems preferred over cemented revision stems with an ETO

Protected weight-bearing (MANDATORY)

  • 0-6 weeks: toe-touch or 20 kg partial with a walker
  • 6 weeks: advance to 50 percent if callus on 2 or more cortices, else continue protection
  • 12 weeks: union (3 of 4 cortices) - advance to full weight-bearing
  • Hip precautions 6 weeks (no flexion past 90 degrees, adduction, internal rotation)
  • Dislocation 5-10 percent in revision

Major complications

  • Non-union 5-10 percent (smoking triples risk) - revision plate plus graft, 80-90 percent success
  • Trochanteric escape 2-5 percent - washers and plate in osteoporosis
  • Intraoperative fracture 5-10 percent - extend osteotomy or cable
  • Subsidence 5-10 percent - revise to a longer stem if over 5 mm
  • Sciatic injury 0.5-2 percent - foot drop, AFO, EMG at 3 weeks

Key pearls

  • ETO gives direct cement-bone visualisation; cortical windows perforate in about 30 percent - the main reason ETO replaced them
  • Ultrasonic cement removal (OSCAR) preferred; finger-protection anteriorly
  • Smoking cessation mandatory preop
  • HO prophylaxis in high-risk: indomethacin or single-fraction radiotherapy
  • Benchmark (Wyles/Abdel 2023): union 98 percent, mean migration 3 mm, migration over 1 cm in 7 percent, 10-year survivorship free of aseptic loosening 97 percent

Background & Evidence


Evolution of the technique. Wagner (1987) first described an anteriorly-based femoral osteotomy for revision, but it had high non-union (20-30 percent) and needed rigid plating. In 1995 Younger, Bradford, Magnus and Paprosky described the modern laterally-based extended trochanteric osteotomy - cutting one-third of the femoral circumference, extending it distally and levering it open on an intact anterolateral muscle-osseous sleeve (gluteus medius, greater trochanter, anterolateral diaphysis, vastus lateralis), repaired with cerclage cables rather than a plate. Their first 20 patients healed reliably with no change to the postoperative regimen. Multiple series since have confirmed union over 90 percent (many over 95 percent); Mardones (Mayo, 2005) reported 73 of 74 retained osteotomies healing without further procedure. Today the ETO is the standard approach worldwide for removing well-fixed cemented and uncemented stems; Paprosky's lateral modification, paired with the posterior approach, has replaced both the original anterior osteotomy and cortical windows. Paprosky femoral bone-loss classification (guides stem selection during ETO)

I
Bone stock
Minimal metaphyseal and diaphyseal loss, intact diaphysis
Stem choice
Standard revision stem
II
Bone stock
Moderate metaphyseal loss, intact diaphysis
Stem choice
Extensively coated or calcar-loading stem
IIIA
Bone stock
Severe metaphyseal loss, good diaphysis (more than 4 cm of fixation)
Stem choice
Extensively porous-coated cylindrical stem (Wagner, Solution, Restoration); 4 cm scratch-fit
IIIB
Bone stock
Poor diaphysis (less than 4 cm of fixation), extensive loss
Stem choice
Modular tapered fluted stem (Reclaim, Arcos, MP); may need APC or megaprosthesis
IV
Bone stock
Extensive metaphyseal and diaphyseal damage, widened non-supportive canal
Stem choice
APC, megaprosthesis, or custom implant
Paprosky femoral classification
TypeBone stockStem choice
IMinimal metaphyseal and diaphyseal loss, intact diaphysisStandard revision stem
IIModerate metaphyseal loss, intact diaphysisExtensively coated or calcar-loading stem
IIIASevere metaphyseal loss, good diaphysis (more than 4 cm of fixation)Extensively porous-coated cylindrical stem (Wagner, Solution, Restoration); 4 cm scratch-fit
IIIBPoor diaphysis (less than 4 cm of fixation), extensive lossModular tapered fluted stem (Reclaim, Arcos, MP); may need APC or megaprosthesis
IVExtensive metaphyseal and diaphyseal damage, widened non-supportive canalAPC, megaprosthesis, or custom implant

Union and outcomes. Modern series report union in over 90 percent (Younger 1995; Mardones 2005), up to 98 percent in contemporary Mayo data (Wyles and Abdel 2023) and long-ETO series (Lakstein 2009, 98.1 percent). Union is bridging callus across the osteotomy; mean fragment migration before union is about 3 mm, with clinically significant migration (over 1 cm) in about 7 percent. The keys to union are preserved fragment vascularity, anatomic reduction, adequate cerclage compression, and protected weight-bearing. Closure typically uses 3-4 cerclage cables or double-stranded Luque wires (one prophylactic distal cable, diaphyseal cables, one above the lesser trochanter); compression across the interface is the mechanical principle that drives union. Cable number and tension are individualised to bone quality rather than maximised. Stem selection outcomes. For Paprosky IIIA (more than 4 cm of supportive diaphysis), extensively porous-coated cylindrical or fluted tapered stems achieve a diaphyseal scratch-fit (around 4-6 cm controls subsidence). For IIIB and IV, modular fluted tapered stems, allograft-prosthetic composite, or proximal femoral replacement are used. Registry and series data favour uncemented diaphyseal-fixation stems over cemented revision stems in this setting; cementing into an osteotomised, sclerotic femur is generally avoided. Why ETO replaced cortical windows. The ETO gives direct visualisation of the cement-bone interface for complete cement removal under vision; blind removal through cortical windows or a closed canal carries a substantially higher femoral perforation and retained-cement risk. This visualisation advantage, not speed, is the principal reason ETO has replaced cortical windows. Guidelines, registries and global practice. National joint registries (NJR England and Wales, AOANJRR Australia, Swedish and Norwegian registers, AJRR USA) consistently report aseptic loosening, infection, instability or dislocation and periprosthetic fracture as the leading indications for revision THA - the situations in which an ETO is most often needed - and favour uncemented diaphyseal-fixation stems for durable revision fixation. An ETO itself does not increase re-revision risk when used appropriately; outcomes are driven by the underlying pathology (especially infection) and bone stock. A single appropriate antibiotic within 60 minutes of incision is standard worldwide (AAOS, NICE, WHO), with no benefit to prophylaxis beyond 24 hours. For high-risk heterotopic ossification, a short NSAID course or single-fraction perioperative radiotherapy is effective. Mechanical plus chemical VTE prophylaxis (aspirin, LMWH, or a direct oral anticoagulant) is recommended after revision THA, with extended duration commonly used given the prolonged reduced mobility during protected weight-bearing.

References


Evidence

Extended proximal femoral osteotomy: a new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty

Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG • Journal of Arthroplasty (1995)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7673912)

Level IV. The original description of the modern laterally-based ETO: the anterolateral proximal femur is cut for one-third of its circumference, extended distally and levered open on an anterolateral hinge of periosteum and muscle, creating an intact muscle-osseous sleeve (gluteus medius, greater trochanter, anterolateral diaphysis, vastus lateralis). It gives wide direct exposure of the fixation surface and distal cement, eliminates inadvertent varus stem placement, and protects a weakened trochanter; repaired with cerclage wires or cables, the first 20 patients showed reliable healing with no change to the postoperative regimen. Establishes the foundational principle - one-third circumferential anterolateral osteotomy on a posterior soft-tissue hinge, cable repair, vascularity preservation - that underpins the over-90-percent union rates reported since. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80182-2

Evidence

Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications

Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ • Journal of Arthroplasty (2005)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15660064)

Level IV. 75 revision THAs (73 patients) using an ETO and an extensively porous-coated uncemented stem; mean osteotomy length 14 cm (range 7-19 cm), fixation with at least 2 cables. 73 of 74 retained osteotomies healed without further procedure (a single non-union was reoperated at 4 months and went on to heal); 68 of 73 healed with no migration and 5 with under 5 mm proximal migration. Complications were 3 intraoperative and 1 postoperative osteotomy-fragment fractures; one stem was revised at 4 months for subsidence and loosening. When the fragment's vascularity is preserved and fixation is rigid, ETO can be performed with a low complication rate and near-universal union, even with relatively long osteotomies. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.014

Evidence

The long modified extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy

Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE • International Orthopaedics (2009)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19834708)

Level IV. 53 long ETOs (mean length 20 cm, range 18-26 cm) through a lateral approach preserving the posterior capsule and short external rotators. 52 of 53 (98.1 percent) united well; mean scratch-fit length 6.5 cm. Harris Hip Score improved from 37 to 73; subsidence occurred in 22.6 percent but 11 stems stabilised over the first year, with only 2 of 53 dislocations. Long ETOs heal reliably; an adequate distal scratch-fit (around 6 cm) with extensively coated stems controls subsidence, and a lateral approach preserving posterior structures reduces dislocation risk. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0890-2

Evidence

The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and classification

Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2004)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15057079)

Level V. Defines the Paprosky femoral bone-loss classification that guides reconstruction choice in femoral revision. Type I and II have supportive metaphyseal bone; Type IIIA retains over 4 cm of intact diaphysis for distal fixation; Type IIIB has under 4 cm of usable diaphysis; Type IV has a non-supportive, widened canal. Type IIIA is best matched to extensively porous-coated or fluted tapered stems achieving diaphyseal scratch-fit; Type IIIB and IV favour modular fluted tapered stems, allograft-prosthetic composite or proximal femoral replacement. Preoperative classification ensures the correct implants and instruments are available at surgery. Matching fixation strategy to the length of remaining supportive diaphyseal bone is the single most important planning decision. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00009

Evidence

Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery

Ting NT, Wera GD, Levine BR, Della Valle CJ • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2010)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 20204557)

Level IV. 29 primary and revision THAs using cerclage cables for ETO, intraoperative proximal femoral fracture, strut allograft fixation and a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture. 2 of 29 patients (7 percent) developed a non-union; all remaining osteotomies, fractures and allografts healed, with no cable breakage or cable-attributable complications. 4 patients (14 percent) dislocated, reflecting the baseline instability risk of revision rather than the fixation construct. Cerclage cable fixation provides reliable compression for ETO and periprosthetic fracture healing; the residual non-union rate (around 7 percent) reflects host biology more than the implant, reinforcing smoking cessation and vascular preservation. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1284-x

Evidence

Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Wyles CC, Hannon CP, Viste A, Perry KI, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Abdel MP • JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (2023)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 38282724)

Level V. Contemporary Mayo Clinic technique: posterior longitudinal limb approximately 12-16 cm distal to the greater trochanter tip; corners rounded with a pencil-tip burr to avoid stress risers; anterior limb completed by controlled fracture to preserve vastus attachments. Radiographic and clinical union in 98 percent; mean fragment migration before union 3 mm; migration over 1 cm in only 7 percent; postoperative greater trochanter fracture in 9 percent. Closure with 3-4 cerclage cables or Luque wires (one prophylactic distal cable, diaphyseal cables, one wire above the lesser trochanter); trochanteric claws or plates generally avoided. 10-year survivorship free of revision for aseptic femoral loosening 97 percent, free of any component removal or revision 91 percent, free of reoperation for any reason 82 percent. Defines the current standard ETO technique and benchmark outcomes against which a candidate should describe their own approach in the viva. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00003

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Hip Posterior Approach (Moore/Southern)
Browse all procedures