General

Triceps Tendon Repair

Surgical technique guide for Triceps Tendon Repair - FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

TRICEPS TENDON REPAIR

Posterior midline approach to distal humerus and olecranon | intermediate

Critical Danger Structures

Danger 1

Ulnar nerve. Location: Passes posterior to medial epicondyle in cubital tunnel, 1-2cm medial to olecranon tip. Protection: Avoid dissection or anchor placement on medial aspect, palpate to confirm not entrapped by hardware or sutures

Danger 2

Posterior interosseous nerve. Location: Emerges between two heads of supinator 6-8cm distal to lateral epicondyle. Protection: Limit lateral dissection beyond radial head level, stay posterior

Danger 3

Elbow joint. Location: Anterior to olecranon footprint, separated by thin cortex. Protection: Angle anchors/tunnels distal and posterior, avoid anterior trajectory, confirm extra-articular on fluoroscopy

Danger 4

Olecranon skin envelope. Location: Thin soft tissue coverage over posterior olecranon prominence. Protection: Curve incision around tip (not over), avoid excessive undermining, careful closure without tension

Danger 5

Anconeus muscle pedicle. Location: Vascular supply enters from lateral epicondyle traveling medially. Protection: If using anconeus turndown, preserve lateral base and vascular pedicle during mobilization

Mnemonic

TRICEPSTRICEPS - Rupture Risk Factors

Memory Hook:Dialysis patients have highest risk - know mechanism (uremic tendinopathy plus hyperparathyroidism). Fluoroquinolones cause spontaneous tendon rupture even in young patients.

Mnemonic

ANCHORANCHOR - Suture Anchor Fixation Technique

Memory Hook:Suture anchors provide >500N load to failure - superior to transosseous tunnels. Double-row technique increases contact area and biomechanical strength by 30-40%.

Indications

Absolute Indications

  1. Complete distal triceps rupture

    • Avulsion from olecranon insertion (80%)
    • Inability to actively extend elbow against gravity
    • Palpable defect at triceps insertion
    • Acute rupture in active or young patient (<60 years)
  2. Failed conservative management

    • Partial tear >50% with persistent weakness
    • Progression from partial to complete tear
    • Functional limitation in activities of daily living
  3. Iatrogenic rupture

    • Triceps detachment during posterior elbow approach
    • Post-operative extensor mechanism failure
    • Revision elbow arthroplasty complications

Relative Indications

  1. Chronic rupture with weakness

    • >6 weeks old but significant functional deficit
    • Active patient desiring return to sports/work
    • Failed non-operative trial with therapy
  2. Partial tear with instability

    • >50% disruption with mechanical symptoms
    • Progression despite bracing and therapy
    • Occupational requirement for elbow strength

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection at surgical site
  • Medical comorbidities precluding anesthesia
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease with ischemic limb
  • Non-compliant patient unable to follow post-operative protocol

Relative:

  • Elderly low-demand patient with chronic rupture
  • Severe osteoporosis compromising fixation
  • Multiple previous failed repairs
  • Extensive soft tissue compromise from burns or trauma
  • Chronic rupture >1 year with severe retraction and muscle atrophy

Patient Selection Criteria

Ideal Candidate:

  • Age 35-60 years, active lifestyle
  • Acute rupture (<6 weeks)
  • Good tissue quality, minimal retraction
  • No significant medical comorbidities
  • Motivated for rehabilitation

High-Risk Patient (requires augmentation):

  • Dialysis-dependent renal failure
  • Chronic tear >6 weeks
  • Revision repair after previous failure
  • Poor tissue quality (thin, friable, retracted >4cm)
  • Steroid use or fluoroquinolone exposure

Complications - Recognition, Prevention, Management

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 48-year-old male dialysis patient presents with inability to extend his elbow after a fall. How do you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is concerning for complete triceps tendon rupture in a high-risk patient. Dialysis patients have 10-fold increased risk due to uremic tendinopathy and secondary hyperparathyroidism causing tendon degeneration. ASSESSMENT: History - mechanism (eccentric loading, fall onto outstretched hand), timing (acute vs chronic), previous injuries, dialysis duration. Examination - palpable defect at insertion, inability to actively extend elbow against gravity (modified Thompson test), passive extension full (excludes mechanical block). Check ulnar nerve function. Imaging - plain radiographs (may show avulsed bone fragment), ultrasound (gap and retraction), MRI (assesses tissue quality, retraction distance, muscle integrity). MANAGEMENT: Operative repair indicated given complete rupture in functional patient. Planning considerations - expect poor tissue quality, plan for augmentation (anconeus turndown or Achilles allograft to reduce re-rupture risk from 5-10% to <5%). Technique - suture anchor fixation (2-4 anchors), high-strength suture (FiberWire), tension at 30-40° flexion, augmentation with anconeus turndown for local vascularized coverage or Achilles allograft if large gap. Post-operative protocol - protect longer (3 weeks immobilization), early ROM weeks 3-6, no resisted extension <12 weeks. PROGNOSIS: Good outcomes achievable (80-90% satisfaction) but higher complication risk than standard patient - re-rupture rate 10-15% even with augmentation (vs 5% standard), wound healing issues, infection risk slightly elevated. Counsel patient on realistic expectations and strict compliance with rehab protocol critical.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You have repaired an acute triceps tendon rupture with suture anchors. At 8 weeks post-op, the patient has a 25-degree flexion contracture. What is your management approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Flexion contracture is the most common complication after triceps repair (20-40% incidence), typically from over-tensioning the repair or delayed mobilization. At 8 weeks, this is still within the window for conservative management. ASSESSMENT: Differentiate from other causes - examine for heterotopic ossification (firm endpoint, radiographs), intra-articular pathology (mechanical block, joint crepitus), nerve injury (check radial and ulnar nerves). Review operative note - was repair over-tensioned? Review therapy records - was ROM delayed or too conservative? Assess active vs passive deficit - passive only suggests capsular contracture, active + passive suggests muscle shortening or mechanical block. INITIAL MANAGEMENT: Aggressive non-operative approach for 4-12 weeks. (1) Physical therapy - daily extension stretching sessions, emphasis on full extension priority over flexion. (2) Serial static extension splinting - progressive nighttime splinting to gain 2-3 degrees per week. (3) Dynamic extension splinting - daytime use if static fails. (4) Address underlying cause - ensure no HO developing (indomethacin prophylaxis if early HO), rule out infection (inflammatory contracture). EXPECTED OUTCOME: Most resolve to functional ROM (0-130°) by 3-6 months with aggressive therapy. Acceptable functional ROM is 30-130° (functional arc 100°), so 25-degree contracture at 8 weeks is concerning but potentially salvageable. SURGICAL OPTIONS if conservative fails at 6 months: (1) Manipulation under anesthesia - risk of repair disruption if <6 months. (2) Arthroscopic capsular release - releases anterior capsule, less invasive. (3) Open anterior release - releases anterior capsule, excises HO if present, allows more complete release. Continue extension splinting after surgery to maintain gains. PREVENTION in future cases: Tension repair at 30-40° flexion ensuring full extension (0°) and flexion >120° intraoperatively. Early protected ROM starting week 3 (0-90° initially). Emphasize extension priority in therapy.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Compare suture anchor versus transosseous tunnel fixation for triceps tendon repair. What does the biomechanical evidence show?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Both techniques are effective for triceps repair, but biomechanical studies favor suture anchors in most scenarios. SUTURE ANCHOR FIXATION: Modern technique using 2-4 anchors (5.5-6.5mm) placed in olecranon footprint. Biomechanics - load to failure >500N (exceeds physiologic triceps force of ~600N during eccentric loading but provides adequate security for early ROM). Double-row configuration increases strength 30-40% over single-row by increasing contact area and distributing load. Clinical failure rate ~5% for acute repairs. Advantages: easier surgical technique, reproducible, allows double-row for stronger construct, less olecranon violation (smaller holes), extra-articular trajectory possible. Disadvantages: cost (anchors expensive), requires adequate bone stock (may fail in severe osteoporosis), potential for anchor pullout if poor technique. TRANSOSSEOUS TUNNEL FIXATION: Traditional technique drilling 3-4mm tunnels through olecranon from posterior to anterior cortex (or intra-articular). Biomechanics - load to failure 400-450N, slightly less than anchors but clinically adequate if well-executed (equivalent outcomes in studies). Strength depends on tunnel size (larger = weaker bone), number (more = weaker), spacing (closer = fracture risk), and suture configuration (Krackow better than simple). Clinical failure rate ~8% for acute repairs. Advantages: lower cost (no implants), does not rely on anchor purchase (useful in osteoporosis if tunnels done carefully), classic technique (examiners may favor). Disadvantages: more technical demanding, tunnel fracture risk if poorly executed, intra-articular sutures may cause irritation, knot prominence. LITERATURE EVIDENCE: Systematic reviews show no significant difference in clinical outcomes (re-rupture rate, ROM, strength) between techniques if properly performed. Biomechanical studies favor anchors for ultimate strength but both exceed physiologic loads. Cost-effectiveness analysis favors tunnels if implant cost considered. Surgeon preference and experience are key factors. MY APPROACH: I prefer suture anchors for acute repairs (easier, reproducible, allows double-row) and consider transosseous tunnels if severe osteoporosis, cost constraints, or anchor unavailability. For chronic repairs with poor tissue, I augment either technique with anconeus turndown or allograft.

Triceps Tendon Repair - Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Sollender JL, Rayan GM, Barden GA. Triceps tendon rupture in weight lifters. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(2):151-153. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90225-1. PMID: 9593093. Classic paper describing triceps ruptures in athletes with anabolic steroid use - mechanism and risk factors.

  2. Yeh PC, Dodds SD, Smart LR, Mazzocca AD, Sethi PM. Distal triceps rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(1):31-40. doi:10.5435/00124635-201001000-00005. PMID: 20047937. Comprehensive JAAOS review of triceps tendon ruptures - anatomy, diagnosis, treatment options.

  3. Pantazopoulos T, Exarchou E, Stavrou Z, Hartofilakidis-Garofalidis G. Avulsion of the triceps tendon. J Trauma. 1975;15(9):827-829. doi:10.1097/00005373-197509000-00013. PMID: 1159860. Early case series describing avulsion pattern as most common - established classification system.

  4. Levy M, Goldberg I, Meir I. Fracture of the head of the radius with a tear or avulsion of the triceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(1):70-72. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.64B1.7068724. PMID: 7068724. Described association between radial head fracture and triceps injury - complex elbow trauma.

  5. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey BF. Surgical techniques for reconstruction of chronic insufficiency of the triceps. Rotation flap using anconeus and tendo achillis allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(8):1116-1120. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13436. PMID: 12463655. Key paper by Morrey describing augmentation techniques - anconeus turndown and Achilles allograft for chronic tears.

  6. Strauch RJ. Biceps and triceps tendon injuries of the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(1):95-107. doi:10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70063-1. PMID: 9882727. Detailed surgical technique review covering acute and chronic repairs - fixation methods comparison.

  7. van Riet RP, Morrey BF, Ho E, O'Driscoll SW. Surgical treatment of distal triceps ruptures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(10):1961-1967. doi:10.2106/00004623-200310000-00015. PMID: 14563805. Large series from Mayo Clinic - outcomes of surgical repair, complication rates, functional results.

  8. Sharma SC, Singh R, Sharma AK, Kohli HS. Triceps tendon rupture in chronic renal failure patients. Int Orthop. 2004;28(3):143-145. doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0541-3. PMID: 15138640. Described high risk of triceps rupture in dialysis patients - uremic tendinopathy and hyperparathyroidism mechanism.

  9. Dunn JC, Kusnezov N, Orr JD, Pallis M, Bailowitz Z. The Achilles tendon allograft in triceps reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2017;40(1):e200-e204. doi:10.3928/01477447-20160902-01. PMID: 27598832. Modern series using Achilles allograft for chronic triceps ruptures - technique and outcomes.

  10. Keener JD, Chafik D, Kim HM, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K. Insertional anatomy of the triceps brachii tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(3):399-405. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.006. PMID: 19884021. Detailed anatomic study of triceps footprint - guides anchor placement and repair techniques.