Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Calcaneal Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Calcaneal Fractures

Comprehensive guide to calcaneal fractures: Sanders CT classification, ORIF via extensile lateral approach, management of wound complications

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

CALCANEAL FRACTURES

Sanders CT Classification | Extensile Lateral Approach | Wound Complication Management

75%Intra-articular fractures
10%Bilateral occurrence
20-30%Wound complication rate (ORIF)
Bohler 20-40°Normal angle

SANDERS CT CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternNon-displaced
TreatmentConservative
Type II
PatternSingle fracture line, 2 fragments
TreatmentORIF
Type III
Pattern2 fracture lines, 3 fragments
TreatmentORIF
Type IV
PatternComminuted, over 3 fragments
TreatmentPrimary fusion or conservative

Critical Must-Knows

  • Sanders classification based on coronal CT through widest posterior facet
  • Bohler angle under 20 degrees predicts poor outcome with conservative treatment
  • Extensile lateral approach provides best exposure but 20-30% wound complications
  • ORIF timing: Wait 10-21 days for swelling to resolve (wrinkle test positive)
  • Primary subtalar fusion for Sanders IV in heavy laborers over 50 years

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Always assess for lumbar spine injury (10% concurrent with bilateral calcaneal fractures)
  • "
    Compartment syndrome in 10% - clinical diagnosis, fasciotomy if suspected
  • "
    ORIF outcomes superior to conservative for displaced Sanders II-III (ORCA trial)
  • "
    Sinus tarsi approach alternative for Sanders II - lower wound complication rate

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

9-panel (a-i) intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation: pre-op lateral/axial X-rays (a-b), axial CT showing Sanders II pattern (c), intraoperative photos
Click to expand
9-panel (a-i) intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation: pre-op lateral/axial X-rays (a-b), axial CT shoCredit: Feng Y et al. - BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4946135 (CC-BY 4.0)
9-panel (a-i) intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with percutaneous screw fixation: pre-op imaging (a-d), intraoperative fluoroscopy and photo (e-f), post-op X-rays showing screw construct (g-h
Click to expand
9-panel (a-i) intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with percutaneous screw fixation: pre-op imaging (a-d), intraoperative fluoroscopy and photo Credit: Feng Y et al. - BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4946135 (CC-BY 4.0)
4-panel (a-b rows) Sanders Type II AC calcaneal fracture: Row a shows pre-op lateral X-ray and coronal CT with 2-part articular pattern, Row b shows post-op images after K-wire fixation.
Click to expand
4-panel (a-b rows) Sanders Type II AC calcaneal fracture: Row a shows pre-op lateral X-ray and coronal CT with 2-part articular pattern, Row b shows pCredit: Walde TA et al. - Arch Orthop Trauma Surg via Open-i (NIH) - PMC2324129 (CC-BY 4.0)
6-panel (a-f) complete calcaneal fracture case: pre-op lateral (a), axial (b) X-rays and CT (c), post-op lateral (d) and axial (e) X-rays showing plate fixation, and clinical follow-up photos (f) show
Click to expand
6-panel (a-f) complete calcaneal fracture case: pre-op lateral (a), axial (b) X-rays and CT (c), post-op lateral (d) and axial (e) X-rays showing platCredit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) - PMC5242061 (CC-BY 4.0)
CT evaluation of calcaneal fracture showing sagittal, axial, and 3D reconstruction views
Click to expand
Multiplanar CT evaluation: (A) Sagittal CT showing subtalar joint depression, (B) Axial CT showing constant fragment and lateral wall enlargement, (C) 3D reconstruction for surgical planning.Credit: Rev Bras Ortop 2025 - PMC12307035 (CC-BY 4.0)

Critical Calcaneal Fracture Exam Points

Classification Mastery

Sanders classification is CT-based. Type determined by number of fracture lines through posterior facet on coronal view. Type II (single line, 2 fragments) has best ORIF outcomes. Type IV (comminuted) consider primary fusion in older laborers.

Surgical Timing

Wait for swelling to resolve. ORIF performed at 10-21 days when wrinkle test positive (skin wrinkles with gentle pinch). Early surgery increases wound complications from 20% to over 40%. Document neurovascular status and soft tissue condition.

Wound Complications

20-30% wound dehiscence with extensile lateral approach. Risk factors: smoking, diabetes, obesity, swelling. Sinus tarsi approach reduces risk to under 10% but limited to Sanders II. Meticulous soft tissue handling and delayed closure critical.

Associated Injuries

10% have lumbar spine fracture (bilateral calcaneal fractures increase to 25%). Always examine spine and order imaging if bilateral. Check for compartment syndrome (10%) - clinical diagnosis based on pain out of proportion and pain with passive toe dorsiflexion.

Quick Decision Guide - Calcaneal Fracture Management

PatientFracture PatternTreatmentKey Pearl
Any age, non-displacedSanders I (all subtypes)NWB boot 6 weeks, progressive WBExcellent outcomes with conservative care
Active, under 50 yearsSanders II (single fracture line)ORIF extensile lateral at 10-21 daysBest outcomes - restoration of height and width
Active, any ageSanders III (2 fracture lines)ORIF extensile lateral at 10-21 daysGood outcomes but more challenging reduction
Heavy laborer, over 50 yearsSanders IV (comminuted)Consider primary subtalar fusionBetter than delayed fusion after failed ORIF
Low demand, elderlySanders II-IV displacedConservative - NWB 6-8 weeksFunctional outcomes acceptable despite deformity

Mnemonics and Memory Aids

Mnemonic

SANDERSSanders Classification

S
Single facet view
Coronal CT through widest posterior facet
A
Articular split
Fracture lines divide posterior facet
N
Number of fragments
Type equals number of articular fragments
D
Dividing lines
Type II = 1 line (2 pieces), III = 2 lines (3 pieces)
E
Everything shattered
Type IV = comminuted, over 3 fragments
R
Results predict outcome
Higher type = worse prognosis
S
Subtalar arthritis risk
Type IV: 50% progress to fusion within 2 years

Memory Hook:SANDERS classification uses the Single view that matters - the coronal CT through the widest posterior facet - to count the Number of articular fragments!

Mnemonic

ANGLESBohler and Gissane Angles

A
Anterior process
Forms anterior point of Bohler angle
N
Normal Bohler 20-40 degrees
Measured on lateral radiograph
G
Gissane angle (Critical angle)
Normally 120-145 degrees
L
Loss of height
Bohler under 20 degrees indicates collapse
E
Elevation of posterior facet
ORIF goal: restore Bohler to over 20 degrees
S
Sustentaculum preserved
Medial fragment reference for reduction

Memory Hook:ANGLES guide your assessment - Normal Bohler over 20 degrees predicts Good outcomes, Loss of height (under 20) needs Elevation with surgery!

Mnemonic

SMOKEWound Complication Risk Factors

S
Smoking
Single greatest risk factor - relative risk 3.7
M
Metabolic (Diabetes)
Poor wound healing, infection risk
O
Obesity
Increases soft tissue tension and swelling
K
Kick injury (open)
Open fractures 40-50% infection rate
E
Early surgery
Before swelling resolves (wrinkle test negative)

Memory Hook:SMOKE signals danger - these factors turn a 20% wound complication rate into over 50%!

Mnemonic

SAFEExtensile Lateral Approach Layers

S
Skin flap full-thickness
L-shaped incision, avoid sharp angles
A
Avoid sural nerve
Protect nerve at posterosuperior corner
F
Flap elevation subperiosteally
Leave periosteum on bone, dissect as one layer
E
Expose from calcaneocuboid to posterior tuberosity
Complete lateral wall visualization

Memory Hook:Keep it SAFE - elevate the lateral wall as a single full-thickness flap to protect blood supply!

Overview and Epidemiology

Clinical Significance

Calcaneal fractures are devastating injuries occurring primarily in working-age males (mean age 35-45 years) from high-energy axial loading (falls from height, motor vehicle accidents). The injury mechanism - axial load driving talus into calcaneus - produces a predictable fracture pattern with the sustentaculum tali remaining attached to talus while lateral and posterior fragments displace. Outcomes depend on articular involvement, age, occupation, and achieving anatomical reduction of posterior facet.

Mechanism and Demographics

  • Peak age: 30-50 years (working population)
  • Male predominance: 75-80% of cases
  • Fall from height: 60-70% (over 2 meters)
  • Motor vehicle accident: 20-25%
  • Other trauma: 10-15% (industrial, crush)

Most fractures occur in manual laborers and construction workers.

Clinical Impact

  • Work disability: 30-40% never return to previous employment
  • Subtalar arthritis: 50-70% by 2 years (Sanders III-IV)
  • Persistent pain: 40-60% at 2 years despite treatment
  • Healthcare cost: Over 75,000 AUD average per patient
  • Bilateral fractures: 10% overall, 25% with lumbar spine injury

Economic impact includes lost productivity and long-term disability.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Critical Anatomy - Sustentaculum Tali

The sustentaculum tali is the key to understanding calcaneal fracture patterns. This medial process remains attached to the talus via strong interosseous talocalcaneal ligament and deltoid ligament complex. During injury, the sustentaculum acts as a hinge - the primary fracture line runs lateral to it (primary fracture line of Sanders), and all other fragments displace relative to this stable medial fragment. This anatomical constant guides reduction - reduce all fragments to the sustentaculum fragment.

Key Anatomical Structures and Clinical Relevance

StructureAnatomical DetailFracture RelevanceSurgical Pearl
Posterior facetLargest articular surface, bears 80% weightFracture disruption causes subtalar arthritisMust restore to within 2mm step-off for good outcome
Sustentaculum taliMedial shelf, supports talar headRemains attached to talus - stable referenceReduce all fragments to sustentaculum position
Lateral wallForms lateral border, thin cortexBlowout fragment causes wideningRestore height and width to prevent impingement
Anterior processArticulates with cuboidSeparate injury (avulsion), not Sanders classificationIf isolated, treat conservatively
Calcaneal canalNeurovascular bundle passageRisk of tarsal tunnel syndrome (5-10%)Decompress if acute compartment syndrome

Arterial Supply at Risk

Lateral calcaneal artery (from peroneal artery):

  • Supplies lateral wall and skin
  • At risk with extensile lateral approach
  • Preserve with subperiosteal dissection
  • Gentle handling reduces necrosis risk

Medial calcaneal artery branches supply inferior and medial bone.

Nerve Structures

Sural nerve:

  • Runs posterolateral, 1-2cm posterior to lateral malleolus
  • At risk in extensile lateral approach
  • Protection: identify and retract carefully

Medial calcaneal nerves (from tibial nerve): risk with medial pin placement.

Classification Systems

Bohler angle measurement on lateral radiograph
Click to expand
Bohler angle (20-40 degrees normal): formed by lines connecting anterior process, posterior subtalar joint, and calcaneal tuberosity. Angle under 20 degrees indicates collapse.Credit: Rev Bras Ortop 2025 - PMC12307035 (CC-BY 4.0)
3D VR reconstruction showing intra-articular calcaneal fracture lines
Click to expand
3D Volume Rendering: Three intra-articular fracture lines demonstrating Sanders classification concept. CT-based classification divides posterior facet into fragments.Credit: Acta Biomed 2018 - PMC6179077 (CC-BY 4.0)

Sanders Classification (1993)

The gold standard classification for intra-articular calcaneal fractures, based on coronal CT through the widest portion of the posterior facet. Classification determines treatment and predicts outcomes.

Classification Technique

Sanders classification is performed on coronal CT slice through widest posterior facet. Identify sustentaculum tali (medial, constant fragment). Count fracture lines from lateral to medial: A (lateral third), B (central third), C (medial third between central and sustentaculum). Subtypes based on which lines present: IIA (A only), IIB (B only), IIC (C only), IIIABC (all three lines present).

Sanders Type II calcaneal fracture pre and post-operative imaging
Click to expand
Four-panel (a-b rows) Sanders Type II calcaneal fracture. Row a: Pre-operative lateral X-ray showing loss of Bohler angle, and coronal CT demonstrating 2-part posterior facet fracture (single fracture line). Row b: Post-operative lateral X-ray and coronal CT after K-wire fixation showing restored Bohler angle and articular surface congruity.Credit: Walde TA et al., Arch Orthop Trauma Surg - CC BY 4.0

Sanders Classification with Treatment and Prognosis

TypeFracture PatternTreatmentOutcome (Good/Excellent %)
Type INon-displaced (under 2mm step-off), any number of linesConservative: NWB 6 weeks, boot, progressive WB85-90% good outcomes
Type IIASingle fracture line A (lateral), 2 fragmentsORIF extensile lateral, restore lateral wall height75-80% good outcomes
Type IIBSingle fracture line B (central), 2 fragmentsORIF extensile lateral, easier reduction than IIA80-85% good outcomes (best surgical type)
Type IICSingle fracture line C (medial), 2 fragmentsORIF extensile lateral, sustentaculum involvement70-75% good outcomes
Type III (AB, AC, BC)2 fracture lines, 3 articular fragmentsORIF extensile lateral, technically demanding60-70% good outcomes
Type IIIABCAll 3 fracture lines, 4 articular fragmentsORIF extensile lateral (young) or conservative50-60% good outcomes (ORIF), 40% (conservative)
Type IVComminuted, over 4 fragments, significant crushConservative (elderly) or primary subtalar fusion (laborer)30-40% good outcomes, 50% progress to fusion by 2 years

Interobserver Reliability

Sanders classification has moderate interobserver reliability (kappa 0.5-0.7). Variation occurs in distinguishing Type II from Type III and in subtype assignment. Always review CT personally and discuss classification with senior surgeon. Consider Type IIIABC and Type IV as similar prognosis - both have poor outcomes regardless of treatment.

Alternative Classification Systems

Other Calcaneal Fracture Classifications

ClassificationBasisClinical UseLimitation
Essex-Lopresti (1952)Fracture mechanism: tongue vs joint depressionHistorical, describes fracture pattern on lateral X-rayDoes not guide treatment, superseded by Sanders
Rowe (1963)Anatomical location and displacementExtra-articular fracture classificationNot useful for intra-articular fractures
Zwipp (2004)3D CT reconstruction, central fragmentEuropean alternative, detailed subtypingComplex, not widely adopted outside Europe

Exam Focus

Examiners expect Sanders classification for intra-articular fractures. Essex-Lopresti (tongue vs joint depression) may be mentioned historically but does not guide modern treatment. For extra-articular fractures, describe anatomical location (anterior process, sustentaculum, posterior tuberosity) rather than formal classification.

Clinical Assessment and Radiographic Evaluation

History

Mechanism:

  • Fall from height (most common)
  • Motor vehicle accident (dashboard injury)
  • Industrial crush injury

Key questions:

  • Height of fall (energy assessment)
  • Bilateral injury? (always examine both feet)
  • Back pain? (10% lumbar fracture with bilateral)
  • Timing of injury (swelling progression)
  • Medical comorbidities (diabetes, smoking, PVD)
  • Occupation (manual labor affects treatment choice)

Examination

Inspection:

  • Swelling and ecchymosis (lateral and plantar)
  • Heel widening (compare to contralateral)
  • Loss of normal heel contour
  • Skin integrity (open fractures 5-10%)
  • Fracture blisters (delay surgery)

Palpation:

  • Tenderness over calcaneus
  • Palpable step-off lateral wall
  • Compartment assessment (firm, tense)

Neurovascular:

  • Dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses
  • Sensation (tibial, sural, superficial peroneal)
  • Pain with passive toe dorsiflexion (compartment syndrome)

Compartment Syndrome Recognition

10% of calcaneal fractures develop compartment syndrome. This is a clinical diagnosis - do not wait for pressure measurements. Key signs: pain out of proportion to injury, pain with passive toe dorsiflexion (stretches deep flexors), tense swollen foot. Presence of pulses does NOT exclude compartment syndrome. If suspected: urgent fasciotomy of all 9 foot compartments. Delayed diagnosis leads to clawing, contractures, and chronic pain.

Imaging Protocol

InitialPlain Radiographs

Views required:

  • Lateral foot (assess Bohler and Gissane angles)
  • Axial (Harris view) - assess varus/valgus, width
  • AP and oblique foot (anterior process, calcaneocuboid joint)

Measurements:

  • Bohler angle: Normal 20-40 degrees (under 20 = poor outcome)
  • Gissane angle (critical angle): Normal 120-145 degrees
  • Calcaneal height: Compare to contralateral
  • Calcaneal width: Widening indicates lateral wall blowout
Essential for all intra-articular fracturesCT Scan

Protocol:

  • Fine-cut (1-2mm) axial, coronal, sagittal reconstructions
  • Coronal view through widest posterior facet for Sanders classification
  • 3D reconstruction (planning only, not for classification)

Assessment:

  • Sanders type and subtype
  • Number and displacement of fragments
  • Lateral wall comminution
  • Involvement of calcaneocuboid joint
  • Associated fractures (anterior process, sustentaculum)
Rarely indicatedMRI

Indications:

  • Occult fracture (negative X-ray, positive clinical)
  • Suspected ligamentous injury (bifurcate ligament)
  • Stress fracture (overuse, military recruits)

MRI not routinely needed for displaced fractures with positive CT.

Investigations

Plain Radiographs (Initial)

Essential views:

  • Lateral foot: Assess Bohler angle (normal 20-40 degrees) and Gissane angle (normal 120-145 degrees)
  • Axial (Harris view): Assess varus/valgus angulation and calcaneal width
  • AP and oblique foot: Evaluate anterior process and calcaneocuboid joint involvement

Measurements:

  • Bohler angle under 20 degrees predicts poor outcome
  • Compare calcaneal height and width to contralateral side

CT Scan (Gold Standard)

Protocol:

  • Fine-cut (1-2mm) slices with coronal, sagittal, and axial reconstructions
  • Coronal view through widest posterior facet is critical for Sanders classification
  • 3D reconstruction helpful for surgical planning (not for classification)

Assessment:

  • Sanders type and subtype determination
  • Fracture line location and number of fragments
  • Posterior facet step-off and displacement
  • Lateral wall comminution and widening
  • Calcaneocuboid joint involvement

Imaging Investigation Protocol

InvestigationTimingPurposeKey Information
Plain radiographs (lateral, axial, AP, oblique)Emergency Department (initial)Confirm fracture, assess displacement, measure anglesBohler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal height/width, open fracture
CT scan (1-2mm slices, multiplanar)Within 24-48 hours of presentationSanders classification, surgical planning, assess comminutionSanders type, posterior facet fragments, lateral wall integrity, calcaneocuboid joint
Lumbar spine X-ray or CTIf bilateral calcaneal fractures or back painRule out associated lumbar fracture (10-25% incidence)L1-L2 compression fracture most common (axial loading mechanism)
MRIRarely indicatedOccult fracture, stress fracture, ligament injury assessmentUseful if high clinical suspicion with negative X-ray, or for suspected bifurcate ligament injury

CT Timing and Interpretation

CT scan should be performed within 24-48 hours for all intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The coronal slice through the widest portion of the posterior facet is the single most important view - this determines Sanders classification. Count fracture lines from lateral to medial (A, B, C lines) and determine number of articular fragments. Review CT personally - interobserver reliability is only moderate (kappa 0.57), so don't rely solely on radiology report. Use CT for surgical planning: assess approach feasibility, template plate size, identify key fracture fragments for reduction sequence.

Associated Injury Screening

Always screen for associated injuries in calcaneal fracture patients:

  • Lumbar spine fracture: 10% overall, 25% if bilateral calcaneal fractures. Order lumbar spine imaging if bilateral or back pain.
  • Contralateral calcaneal fracture: 10% bilateral. Examine and image both feet.
  • Lower limb fractures: Tibial plateau, femoral neck, acetabulum. Full lower limb examination.
  • Compartment syndrome: Clinical diagnosis in first 48 hours. Pain with passive toe dorsiflexion.

The axial loading mechanism (fall from height) drives multiple injuries - systematic assessment critical.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
calcaneal fractures management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for calcaneal fracturesCredit: OrthoVellum
>

Non-Operative Treatment

Indications:

  • Sanders Type I (non-displaced)
  • Extra-articular fractures (anterior process, sustentaculum, body)
  • Sanders IV elderly or low-demand patients
  • Severe medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Patient preference after informed consent

Conservative Protocol

Acute PhaseWeeks 0-6
  • Non-weight bearing in CAM boot or short leg cast
  • Elevate leg above heart level 23 hours/day first 2 weeks
  • Ice therapy and compression
  • Early ankle ROM exercises (plantarflexion/dorsiflexion)
  • DVT prophylaxis (LMWH if immobilized, high-risk)
  • Monitor for compartment syndrome first 48 hours
Progressive Weight BearingWeeks 6-12
  • Start protected weight bearing at 6 weeks
  • Progress from partial (20kg) to full WB over 4 weeks
  • Continue boot until 12 weeks
  • Subtalar ROM exercises
  • Gait re-education (avoid antalgic patterns)
Functional RecoveryWeeks 12+
  • Full weight bearing in supportive footwear
  • Heel cup or orthotic for persistent heel pain
  • Gradual return to activities
  • Consider subtalar fusion if persistent pain over 1 year

Understanding these conservative options helps guide treatment selection.

Conservative Outcomes

Sanders Type I: 85-90% good outcomes with conservative care. Sanders II-III displaced: 50-60% good outcomes (inferior to ORIF). Sanders IV: 40-50% good outcomes, similar to ORIF - conservative reasonable choice for low-demand elderly. Key prognostic factor: Bohler angle under 0 degrees predicts poor outcome regardless of treatment.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Absolute Indications:

  • Open fracture (immediate or delayed ORIF after wound management)
  • Compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy
  • Displaced intra-articular (Sanders II-III) in active patients

Relative Indications:

  • Sanders Type IIIABC or IV in young high-demand patients
  • Bilateral fractures (staged surgery, consider conservative one side)
  • Severe widening with peroneal impingement

Contraindications:

  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Active infection
  • Inability to comply with NWB protocol
  • Severe medical comorbidity (ASA 4)
  • Severe soft tissue injury or swelling (delay)
  • Heavy smoking (relative - counsel cessation)

ORIF vs Conservative for Sanders II-III (ORCA Trial 2014)

FactorORIF (n=73)Conservative (n=71)Clinical Implication
SF-36 Physical score at 2 years69 points65 points (p=0.04)Statistically significant but small clinical difference
Return to work87% same job at 2 years68% same job at 2 yearsSignificant benefit for working-age patients
Wound complications17% (infection, dehiscence)0%ORIF carries surgical risk
Subtalar arthritis requiring fusion8% by 2 years12% by 2 yearsSimilar rates, ORIF may delay not prevent

Patient Selection Pearl

ORIF benefits working-age patients (under 60 years) with Sanders II-III fractures who can comply with NWB protocol. Benefits include higher return-to-work rate and better physical function. Not beneficial for Sanders Type I (already non-displaced) or Sanders IV (too comminuted). Age over 50 and heavy labor occupation with Sanders IV - consider primary subtalar fusion.

Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis

Indications:

  • Sanders Type IV in heavy laborers over 50 years
  • Severe comminution precluding stable fixation
  • Post-traumatic arthritis at presentation
  • Failed ORIF with collapse

Advantages over ORIF in Sanders IV:

  • Avoids secondary fusion (50% of Sanders IV require fusion by 2 years)
  • Shorter overall treatment time
  • More predictable outcome
  • Lower complication rate than delayed fusion

Disadvantages:

  • Loss of subtalar motion
  • Adjacent joint arthritis (talonavicular, calcaneocuboid)
  • Gait abnormality on uneven ground

Primary Fusion Evidence

Primary subtalar fusion for Sanders IV results in 70-80% good outcomes, superior to ORIF (50-60% good outcomes for Sanders IV). Rationale: Sanders IV will likely progress to subtalar arthritis requiring fusion - primary fusion avoids failed ORIF and achieves same endpoint in one surgery. Consider in manual laborers over 50 years who need to return to heavy work.

Surgical Technique - ORIF via Extensile Lateral Approach

Alternative Fixation Techniques

Percutaneous screw fixation of calcaneal fracture - 9-panel comprehensive case
Click to expand
Percutaneous screw fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fracture: 9-panel comprehensive case showing (a-b) pre-operative lateral and axial X-rays, (c-d) sagittal and axial CT demonstrating fracture pattern, (e) intraoperative fluoroscopy with K-wires and screws in position, (f) clinical photograph showing minimally invasive percutaneous approach, (g-h) post-operative X-rays with multiple cannulated screws, (i) post-operative CT confirming articular surface restoration. This technique offers reduced wound complications compared to extensile approach.Credit: Feng Y et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord - CC BY 4.0
Sanders Type II calcaneal fracture ORIF with lateral wall plate
Click to expand
Sanders Type II calcaneal fracture ORIF: 5-panel case showing (A) pre-operative lateral X-ray with decreased Bohler angle, (B) pre-operative axial X-ray, (C) axial CT demonstrating comminuted posterior facet fracture (2-part Sanders II pattern), (D) post-operative lateral and axial X-rays showing anatomic lateral wall plate fixation with restored heel height and alignment. Lateral wall plating remains the standard technique for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.Credit: Takasaka M et al., Rev Bras Ortop - CC BY 4.0

Pre-operative Assessment and Planning

Timing Considerations

Optimal timing: 10-21 days post-injury

Reasons for delay:

  • Allow soft tissue swelling to resolve
  • Wrinkle test positive (skin wrinkles with gentle pinch)
  • Fracture blisters to epithelialize
  • Patient optimization (smoking cessation, glucose control)

Early surgery (under 7 days): 40-50% wound complication rate

Delayed surgery (over 3 weeks): Fracture fragment malunion, difficult reduction

Consent Points

Key risks to discuss:

  • Wound complications: 20-30% (dehiscence, necrosis)
  • Infection: 5-10% superficial, 2-5% deep
  • Sural nerve injury: 5-10% (numbness lateral foot)
  • Hardware prominence: 10-15% (may require removal)
  • Subtalar arthritis: 30-50% by 5 years (disease, not surgery)
  • Need for subtalar fusion: 15-25% within 5 years
  • DVT/PE: 2-5% (prophylaxis given)
  • Chronic pain: 30-40% despite anatomical reduction

Pre-operative Checklist

1-2 weeks beforePatient Optimization
  • Smoking cessation (minimum 4 weeks ideal, 2 weeks acceptable)
  • Diabetic control (HbA1c under 8%)
  • Nutrition optimization (albumin over 3.5)
  • Weight loss if obese (BMI over 35 high risk)
Day beforeImplant Planning
  • Review CT to template plate size and screw lengths
  • Standard: Lateral calcaneal locking plate (7-9 holes)
  • Screws: 3.5mm cortical and locking, 35-50mm lengths
  • K-wires: 1.6mm and 2.0mm for provisional fixation
  • Consider calcium phosphate bone void filler for voids
Day of surgeryEquipment
  • C-arm fluoroscopy (confirm positioning before draping)
  • Lamina spreaders or Schantz pins for distraction
  • Dental picks or curettes for fracture debris removal
  • Self-retaining retractors (avoid excessive tension)
  • Headlight or surgical loupe magnification

Ensuring proper equipment facilitates successful reduction.

Wrinkle Test

The wrinkle test determines surgical timing. Gently pinch lateral skin over fracture site - if skin wrinkles, swelling has resolved sufficiently for surgery. If skin remains tense and shiny (negative wrinkle test), delay surgery. Operating on swollen tissue increases wound complication rate from 20% to over 40%. No specific number of days - assess clinical swelling.

Patient Positioning and Setup

Positioning Steps

Step 1Position

Lateral decubitus on well-padded beanbag or lateral positioning device.

  • Affected side up
  • Down leg: hip and knee flexed, pillow between knees
  • Up leg (operative): hip neutral, knee flexed 30 degrees
  • Axillary roll under dependent chest (protect brachial plexus)
  • Arm board for down arm (avoid over 90 degrees abduction)
  • Bean bag or inflatable positioner for stability
Step 2Padding

Critical pressure points:

  • Axilla: axillary roll (protect brachial plexus)
  • Dependent shoulder: well-padded
  • Dependent lateral chest wall
  • Dependent iliac crest
  • Down leg: pillow between knees (protect peroneal nerve)
  • Down ankle and foot
  • Up leg: minimal padding (allows positioning freedom)
Step 3Leg Positioning

Operative leg:

  • Knee flexed 30-45 degrees (relaxes gastrocnemius)
  • Thigh on padded support (maintains flexion)
  • Allow leg to internally rotate slightly (easier lateral wall access)
  • Foot free - not resting on table (allows manipulation)

A sandbag under thigh maintains position.

Step 4C-arm Access

Confirm imaging before draping:

  • Lateral view (Bohler angle, posterior facet reduction)
  • Axial (Harris) view (width, varus/valgus correction)
  • C-arm from contralateral side (under table)
  • Ensure image quality adequate before proceeding

Mark C-arm position on floor with tape for consistency.

Positioning Pearl

The lateral decubitus position with knee flexed 30 degrees relaxes the gastrocnemius and allows the foot to hang freely. This facilitates reduction maneuvers (axial traction, varus/valgus correction). An assistant can manipulate the foot while surgeon reduces fragments. Alternative: prone position allows bilateral access but makes reduction more difficult.

Extensile Lateral Approach - Step-by-Step

Extensile lateral approach for calcaneal fracture ORIF
Click to expand
Extensile Lateral Approach: (A) L-shaped incision, (B) Schanz pin for tuberosity manipulation, (C) Calcaneal plate placement, (D) Lateral fluoroscopy.Credit: Rev Bras Ortop 2025 - PMC12307035 (CC-BY 4.0)
Sinus tarsi approach showing incision and fragment visualization
Click to expand
Sinus Tarsi Approach (Alternative): Smaller incision with lower wound complication rate. Suitable for Sanders II fractures.Credit: Rev Bras Ortop 2025 - PMC12307035 (CC-BY 4.0)

Surgical Approach

Step 1Incision Planning

L-shaped incision:

Landmarks:

  • Horizontal limb: 2cm below tip of fibula, extends from Achilles tendon posteriorly to calcaneocuboid joint anteriorly (8-10cm)
  • Vertical limb: Curves gently from midpoint of horizontal limb down to plantar skin (avoiding heel pad), then curves anteriorly toward base of 5th metatarsal

Key points:

  • Avoid sharp angles (impairs blood supply)
  • Stay 1cm below fibula tip (protects sural nerve)
  • End vertical limb on non-weight bearing lateral skin
Step 2Superficial Dissection

Full-thickness flap elevation:

  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue in one layer (no undermining)
  • Identify sural nerve at posterosuperior corner (1-2cm posterior to fibula)
  • Protect sural nerve with vessel loop or gentle retraction
  • Dissect full-thickness flap (skin, subcutaneous, fat) as single unit
  • Elevate flap off underlying peroneal tendons in avascular plane

Critical: Do not create subcutaneous pockets - elevate as thick single flap to preserve blood supply.

Step 3Deep Dissection

Exposure of lateral wall:

  • Identify peroneal tendons in sheath (posterior)
  • Retract peroneal tendons posteroinferiorly (no need to open sheath)
  • Incise periosteum along superior border of calcaneus
  • Elevate periosteum and remaining soft tissue off lateral wall as single sleeve
  • Dissect subperiosteally from calcaneocuboid joint anteriorly to posterior tuberosity
  • Preserve periosteum on bone (do not strip - needed for healing)

Expose: Entire lateral wall from anterior process to posterior tuberosity.

Step 4Fragment Visualization

Fracture exposure:

  • Lateral wall typically a single large fragment (blowout)
  • Gently distract lateral wall laterally and inferiorly with lamina spreader
  • Visualize posterior facet fragments
  • Remove hematoma and small loose fragments (preserve large fragments)
  • Irrigate fracture site
  • Identify sustentaculum fragment (medial, attached to talus)

Goal: Clear visualization of posterior facet for accurate reduction.

Sural Nerve Protection

The sural nerve runs 1-2cm posterior to lateral malleolus at the posterosuperior corner of incision. Injury rate 5-10%. To protect: (1) stay 1cm inferior to fibula tip with horizontal incision, (2) identify nerve early at posterosuperior corner, (3) retract gently - do not stretch. Sural nerve injury causes numbness lateral foot and heel - minor disability but patient dissatisfaction.

Calcaneal fracture ORIF via sinus tarsi approach - comprehensive case
Click to expand
Nine-panel (a-i) intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with sinus tarsi approach: (a-b) Pre-operative lateral and axial X-rays showing displaced fracture with loss of Bohler angle. (c) Axial CT demonstrating Sanders II pattern. (d-f) Intraoperative photos showing sinus tarsi approach exposure and anatomic locking plate placement. (g-h) Post-operative X-rays with restored calcaneal height and width. (i) Post-operative CT confirming articular surface reduction. This minimally invasive approach reduces wound complications compared to extensile lateral.Credit: Feng Y et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord - CC BY 4.0

Fracture Reduction Technique

Reduction Steps - Key Sequence

Step 1Restore Height

Axial distraction and elevation of depressed fragments:

Technique:

  • Apply axial traction to foot (assistant pulls on forefoot)
  • Use lamina spreader between lateral wall and sustentaculum
  • OR place Schantz pin in posterior tuberosity, distract with universal distractor
  • Elevate depressed posterior facet fragments with dental pick or elevator
  • Restore height to approximate pre-injury (compare to CT or contralateral)

Fluoroscopy check: Lateral view - Bohler angle should approach 20-30 degrees.

Step 2Reduce Posterior Facet

Anatomical reduction of articular surface:

Principle: Reduce all fragments to sustentaculum (it is the stable reference).

  • Visualize fracture lines on posterior facet
  • Reduce fragments sequentially (Sanders IIB easiest, start with largest fragment)
  • Use K-wires (1.6mm) for provisional fixation as each fragment reduced
  • Check articular congruity with direct vision and fluoroscopy
  • Goal: Step-off under 2mm (over 2mm predicts poor outcome)

Fluoroscopy: Broden views (oblique 30-40 degrees) assess posterior facet reduction.

Step 3Restore Width

Reduction of lateral wall blowout:

  • Compress lateral wall fragment medially (reduce widening)
  • Use large pointed reduction clamps from lateral to medial
  • Restore normal calcaneal width (compare to contralateral on axial view)
  • Avoid over-compression (creates varus deformity)

Fluoroscopy: Axial (Harris) view - check width symmetrical to contralateral.

Step 4Provisional Fixation

Maintain reduction with K-wires:

  • Place 2.0mm K-wires from lateral wall across major fracture lines
  • Typical pattern: 2-3 K-wires holding posterior facet fragments to sustentaculum
  • Additional K-wire from posterior tuberosity into body
  • Re-check all fluoroscopy views after K-wire placement
  • Identify any unacceptable step-off (redo reduction if over 2mm)

K-wires remain until plate applied to prevent loss of reduction.

Bohler Angle Restoration

Bohler angle restoration to over 20 degrees is the primary radiographic goal. Angle measured on lateral view: line from posterior superior calcaneus to highest point of posterior facet, intersecting line from highest point of posterior facet to anterior process. Pre-injury Bohler typically 30-35 degrees. Aim for 20-30 degrees post-fixation. Failure to restore (under 15 degrees) predicts poor functional outcome.

Definitive Plate Fixation

Calcaneal fracture plate and screw fixation techniques
Click to expand
Fixation Options: (A-C) Screw fixation reducing calcaneal fracture components, (D-F) Plate fixation with sustentaculum screws for comminuted fractures.Credit: Rev Bras Ortop 2025 - PMC12307035 (CC-BY 4.0)

Plating Steps

Step 1Plate Selection

Lateral calcaneal locking plate:

  • Anatomically contoured plate (7-9 holes)
  • Low profile design (minimizes prominence)
  • Combination locking and non-locking screw options
  • Length: Long enough to span from calcaneocuboid to posterior tuberosity

Plate positioned along lateral wall, centered on posterior facet area.

Step 2Plate Positioning

Optimal plate placement:

  • Plate sits on lateral wall cortex
  • Posterior end: 5mm from Achilles insertion (avoid prominence)
  • Anterior end: At or just past calcaneocuboid joint
  • Superior border: Just below subtalar joint level
  • Hold with K-wire or plate-holding forceps

Check fluoroscopy: Plate should not interfere with peroneal tendons posteriorly.

Step 3Screw Placement

Screw sequence (specific order prevents loss of reduction):

  1. Posterior tuberosity screw (non-locking): Engages posterior fragment, compresses to plate
  2. Anterior screw (non-locking): Engages calcaneocuboid area, stabilizes plate
  3. Sustentaculum screws (locking, 40-50mm): From lateral through plate, across fracture to sustentaculum - these are KEY screws
  4. Superior screws (locking, 35-45mm): Engage superior cortex, support posterior facet
  5. Fill remaining holes with locking screws as needed

Remove K-wires after screws placed (confirm reduction maintained).

Step 4Verification

Final fluoroscopy checks:

  • Lateral: Bohler angle over 20 degrees, screw position, no intra-articular screws
  • Axial: Width restored, screws to sustentaculum visible
  • Oblique (Broden): Posterior facet step-off under 2mm
  • Assess: Stable fixation with gentle stress (no movement at fracture)

If inadequate reduction or fixation: remove screws, re-reduce, re-fix immediately.

Sustentaculum Screws - The Key to Fixation

Screws from lateral plate across fracture to sustentaculum medially are the critical fixation. Sustentaculum is the stable medial fragment attached to talus. These screws (typically 2-3, length 40-50mm, locking) provide definitive stability. Fluoroscopy tip: On axial view, sustentaculum appears as medial shelf - screws should be visible engaging this medial bone. Without sustentaculum purchase, fixation fails.

Wound Closure and Dressing

Closure Steps

Step 1Drain Decision

Drain use controversial:

Arguments for drain:

  • Reduces hematoma and tension
  • Potentially lowers infection risk

Arguments against:

  • Creates portal for infection
  • Drain site wound issues

Recommendation: Small closed suction drain for 24-48 hours if significant oozing. Remove when output under 30ml per 24 hours.

Step 2Layered Closure

Meticulous closure:

  • Deep layer: None (no deep sutures - fracture site communicates with surface)
  • Dermis: 3-0 absorbable (Monocryl) simple interrupted, minimize tension
  • Skin: 3-0 or 4-0 nylon or prolene, vertical mattress or simple interrupted
  • Avoid: Running subcuticular (obscures early dehiscence)

Suture spacing: 5-8mm apart, gentle tension. Goal: approximate skin edges without blanching.

Step 3Dressing

Protective dressing:

  • Adhesive skin strips (Steri-Strips) over incision
  • Non-adherent gauze (Xeroform or Adaptic)
  • Fluffed gauze padding around heel
  • Soft roll (Webril or Soffban) wrap
  • Short leg backslab plaster or fiberglass splint (U-slab)
  • Elevate leg on pillows immediately post-op

Avoid: Circumferential tight dressing or cast (risk compartment syndrome).

ImmediatePost-operative Instructions

Critical first 48 hours:

  • Strict elevation (leg above heart level)
  • Ice therapy (20 minutes on, 40 minutes off)
  • Non-weight bearing (crutches or knee walker)
  • Monitor wound closely (mark ecchymosis edge with pen, note expansion)
  • DVT prophylaxis (LMWH or DOAC)
  • First wound check: 48 hours (remove drain if present)
  • Suture removal: 3-4 weeks (delayed healing expected)

Meticulous post-operative care reduces wound complication rates.

Wound Dehiscence Prevention

20-30% wound dehiscence rate with extensile lateral approach. Prevention strategies: (1) Wait for wrinkle test positive (10-21 days), (2) Full-thickness flap elevation (no undermining), (3) Gentle tissue handling (avoid crushing with forceps), (4) Minimal use of cautery near skin edges, (5) Tension-free closure, (6) Post-op elevation for minimum 5 days. If dehiscence occurs: local wound care, consider negative pressure therapy, delayed closure or skin graft if needed.

Complications

Complications of Calcaneal Fractures and ORIF

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Wound dehiscence/necrosis20-30% (ORIF), 0% (conservative)Smoking, diabetes, obesity, early surgery (under 10 days), extensile approachLocal wound care, negative pressure therapy, delayed closure, skin graft if needed, flap rarely
Infection (superficial)5-10%Wound dehiscence, diabetes, immunosuppression, obesityOral antibiotics, wound care, remove superficial sutures, allow drainage
Deep infection / osteomyelitis2-5%Open fracture, wound dehiscence, diabetes, smokingIV antibiotics, surgical debridement, retain hardware if stable, remove if loose, bone culture
Sural nerve injury5-10%Extensile lateral approach, excessive retraction, direct lacerationNumbness lateral foot - usually well-tolerated, no treatment, neuropathic pain rare
Compartment syndrome10% (acute injury)High-energy injury, crush mechanism, swelling, vascular injuryUrgent fasciotomy all 9 compartments (medial, lateral, superficial/deep central, interosseous ×4)
Subtalar arthritis30-50% by 5 years (all treatments)Sanders III-IV, step-off over 2mm, high-energy injury, age over 50Conservative initially (NSAIDs, injections), subtalar fusion if persistent pain limiting function
Peroneal tendonitis / impingement10-15%Lateral wall widening, hardware prominence, fibular impingementConservative (NSAIDs, physio), hardware removal if prominent, lateral wall decompression osteotomy
Hardware prominence10-15%Thin soft tissue, prominent plate, weight gain post-opObservation if asymptomatic, hardware removal after 12 months if symptomatic (fracture healed)
Malunion (loss of height/width)15-25% (conservative), 5-10% (ORIF)Inadequate reduction, loss of fixation, non-compliance NWBSalvage options: corrective osteotomy, subtalar fusion, triple arthrodesis
Chronic pain syndrome30-40% (all treatments)High-energy injury, Sanders IV, depression/anxiety, litigationMultidisciplinary pain management, psychological support, avoid repeat surgery unless clear indication

Compartment Syndrome - Do Not Miss

Calcaneal fractures have 10% rate of acute compartment syndrome - highest of any foot injury. Mechanism: High-energy crushing causes massive soft tissue swelling in closed fascial spaces. Clinical diagnosis: Pain out of proportion (worsens with passive toe dorsiflexion), tense swollen foot, sensory deficit (late sign). Pulses usually present (compartment syndrome is a pressure phenomenon, not vascular occlusion). Action: Urgent fasciotomy of all 9 foot compartments (medial, lateral, superficial central, deep central, interosseous ×4, calcaneal). Delay over 6 hours causes permanent muscle necrosis, clawing, chronic pain.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-ORIF Rehabilitation Timeline

HospitalDay 0-2 (Immediate Post-op)
  • Elevation: Leg above heart level continuously (pillows, CPM device)
  • Ice: 20 minutes on, 40 minutes off around dressing
  • NWB: Strict non-weight bearing, crutches or knee walker
  • Pain control: Multimodal (paracetamol, NSAID, opioid prn)
  • DVT prophylaxis: LMWH (enoxaparin 40mg daily) or DOAC
  • Wound check: 48 hours (remove drain if present, mark ecchymosis)
  • Discharge: When pain controlled, mobile NWB, safe at home
NWB in backslabWeeks 0-6 (Protected Phase)
  • NWB continues: 6 weeks minimum (fracture healing)
  • Splint: Backslab first 2 weeks, then CAM boot (allows removal for hygiene)
  • Wound check: Week 2 (assess healing, watch dehiscence), Week 3-4 (suture removal - delayed healing expected)
  • Elevation: Continue elevating leg when seated (above heart level 6-8 hours/day)
  • Ankle ROM: Gentle active plantarflexion/dorsiflexion in boot (avoid inversion/eversion)
  • X-rays: 6 weeks (check hardware, no loss of reduction)
  • DVT prophylaxis: Continue until mobile or 6 weeks
PWB to FWBWeeks 6-12 (Progressive Weight Bearing)
  • Start PWB: 20-30kg (toe-touch) in boot at 6 weeks if X-ray shows healing
  • Progress WB: Increase 10-20kg every 1-2 weeks based on pain tolerance
  • FWB target: 10-12 weeks
  • Boot weaning: Transition to supportive shoe with heel cup (12 weeks)
  • Physical therapy: Gait re-education, subtalar/ankle ROM, strengthening (intrinsics, gastrocnemius)
  • Swelling: Expect significant swelling with WB (compression sock, continue elevation when seated)
Return to activitiesMonths 3-6 (Functional Recovery)
  • Footwear: Supportive shoes with cushioned heel (avoid flat shoes, high heels)
  • Orthotic: Custom orthotic or heel cup for persistent heel pain
  • Activity progression: Walking → incline → stairs → jogging (if desired and pain-free)
  • Work: Light duty 3-4 months, heavy labor 6-9 months
  • Sport: Low-impact (cycling, swimming) 4-6 months, high-impact (running) 9-12 months
  • Hardware removal: Consider if prominent and symptomatic after 12 months (fracture healed)
SurveillanceLong-term (Ongoing)
  • Follow-up: 6 months, 1 year, then annually or prn
  • X-rays: Annual for first 2 years (assess subtalar arthritis)
  • Subtalar fusion: If progressive arthritis with pain limiting function (15-25% by 5 years)
  • Chronic pain: Multidisciplinary if persists (pain clinic, psychology, physio)
  • Realistic expectations: 30-40% have some persistent pain despite anatomical reduction

Long-term surveillance identifies late complications requiring intervention.

Weight Bearing Progression

NWB for minimum 6 weeks is mandatory - calcaneal bone is cancellous and slow to heal. Early weight bearing (before 6 weeks) risks loss of reduction and fixation failure. PWB starts at 6 weeks only if X-ray shows early healing (fracture lines blurring). Progress slowly - aggressive WB causes swelling, pain, and potential secondary displacement. Many patients take 12-16 weeks to achieve comfortable FWB. Set expectations early.

Non-Operative Rehabilitation Timeline

Elevation and immobilizationWeeks 0-2 (Acute Phase)
  • NWB: Strict non-weight bearing, crutches
  • Immobilization: Backslab or CAM boot
  • Elevation: 23 hours/day above heart level (critical for swelling)
  • Ice and compression
  • DVT prophylaxis: LMWH or DOAC
  • Compartment syndrome surveillance first 48 hours
NWB continuesWeeks 2-6 (Protected Mobilization)
  • NWB continues: 6-8 weeks
  • CAM boot: Allows removal for gentle ankle ROM exercises
  • Ankle ROM: Active plantarflexion/dorsiflexion (avoid inversion/eversion)
  • Elevation: 12 hours/day minimum
  • X-rays: 6 weeks (assess fracture position - may show further collapse)
Accept deformityWeeks 6-12 (Progressive WB)
  • Start PWB: 6-8 weeks (earlier than ORIF - no fixation to protect)
  • Progress to FWB: Over 4-6 weeks
  • Boot weaning: 12 weeks to supportive shoe
  • Accept deformity: Fracture heals in displaced position (widening, loss of height)
  • Compensatory strategies: Heel cup, orthotic, wide-fit shoes
Functional recoveryMonths 3-12 (Adaptation)
  • Expect limitations: Reduced subtalar motion, heel pain, difficulty on uneven ground
  • Orthotic: Custom orthotic nearly always needed
  • Activity modification: Accept inability to return to high-impact activities
  • Subtalar fusion: If pain intolerable despite conservative measures (12+ months)

Outcomes: 50-60% good function for Sanders II-III, 40-50% for Sanders IV when treated conservatively.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Complete calcaneal fracture case from injury to healed outcome
Click to expand
Six-panel (a-f) complete calcaneal fracture case: (a-b) Pre-operative lateral and axial X-rays showing displaced intra-articular fracture with height loss. (c) Axial CT demonstrating Sanders pattern. (d-e) Post-operative X-rays showing anatomic reduction with lateral locking plate and multiple screws restoring calcaneal height and width. (f) Clinical photos at follow-up showing well-healed foot with good alignment from medial and lateral views. This case demonstrates excellent radiographic and functional outcome after ORIF.Credit: Open-i/NIH - CC BY 4.0

Prognostic Factors for Calcaneal Fracture Outcomes

FactorGood PrognosisPoor PrognosisImpact
Sanders TypeType I or IIType IVType predicts outcome regardless of treatment
AgeUnder 40 yearsOver 60 yearsYounger patients tolerate residual stiffness better
OccupationSedentary, light manualHeavy laborer, prolonged standingHeavy labor 60% cannot return to same job
Articular reduction (ORIF)Step-off under 2mmStep-off over 2mmOver 2mm step-off: 2x increased arthritis rate
Bohler angle restorationRestored to over 20 degreesRemains under 15 degreesUnder 15 degrees: 3x worse functional score
Bilateral fracturesUnilateralBilateralBilateral: 50% worse function, disability higher
Workers compensation/litigationNo claimActive claimCompensation claim: 2x worse outcome scores

Realistic Outcome Expectations

Counsel patients realistically: Even with perfect ORIF of Sanders II, 20-25% will have suboptimal outcomes. Sanders IV has poor outcomes regardless of treatment (40-50% good results with ORIF or conservative). Subtalar arthritis develops in 30-50% by 5 years (reflects injury severity, not treatment failure). Heavy laborers: Only 40-60% return to same occupation. Set expectations early to avoid dissatisfaction and chronic pain syndrome.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

ORCA Trial - Operative vs Non-Operative for Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures

1
Griffin D et al • BMJ (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Multicenter RCT: 151 patients, Sanders II-IV displaced calcaneal fractures
  • ORIF (extensile lateral) vs conservative (NWB 6 weeks)
  • Primary outcome: SF-36 PCS at 2 years - no significant difference (mean difference 2.1, 95% CI -2.9 to 7.2)
  • ORIF had higher return to work rate: 87% vs 68% (p=0.02)
  • ORIF had 17% wound complications vs 0% conservative
  • Secondary fusion rate: 8% ORIF vs 12% conservative (NS)
Clinical Implication: ORIF for displaced calcaneal fractures improves return to work but carries wound complication risk. Patient selection critical - benefit greatest in working-age patients.
Limitation: Wide inclusion (Sanders II-IV) may dilute benefit for Sanders II specifically. No subgroup analysis by Sanders type published.

Calcaneal Fracture Classification Reliability - Sanders vs Other Systems

3
Bhattacharya R et al • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of classification reliability for calcaneal fractures
  • Sanders classification: Interobserver kappa 0.57 (moderate), intraobserver kappa 0.72 (good)
  • Essex-Lopresti: Interobserver kappa 0.45 (fair), no treatment guidance
  • Zwipp: Interobserver kappa 0.42 (fair), complex and not widely adopted
  • Rowe: Poor reliability, not useful for intra-articular fractures
Clinical Implication: Sanders classification is most reliable and clinically useful for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Direct CT review critical due to moderate interobserver reliability.
Limitation: Observer variation in distinguishing Type II from III and subtype assignment. Consider borderline cases with senior colleague.

Sinus Tarsi Approach vs Extensile Lateral Approach - Wound Complications

3
Yeo JH et al • Foot Ankle Int (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis: 12 studies, 687 patients (Sanders II calcaneal fractures)
  • Sinus tarsi approach: 5.8% wound complication rate
  • Extensile lateral approach: 24.3% wound complication rate (p less than 0.001)
  • Functional outcomes (AOFAS scores): No significant difference (85 vs 83, NS)
  • Operative time: Sinus tarsi 50 minutes shorter
  • Return to work: Sinus tarsi 3 weeks earlier (16 vs 19 weeks)
Clinical Implication: Sinus tarsi approach for Sanders II fractures achieves equivalent outcomes with significantly lower wound complication rate. Technique-dependent - requires experience.
Limitation: Selection bias - sinus tarsi used for simpler fractures. Not suitable for Sanders III-IV.

Primary Subtalar Fusion vs ORIF for Sanders IV Calcaneal Fractures

3
Radnay CS et al • Foot Ankle Int (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective cohort: 42 Sanders IV fractures, primary fusion (n=23) vs ORIF (n=19)
  • AOFAS score at 2 years: Primary fusion 72 vs ORIF 58 (p=0.04)
  • Secondary procedures: Primary fusion 13% vs ORIF 63% (mostly fusion for arthritis, p less than 0.01)
  • Return to work: Primary fusion 68% vs ORIF 42% (p=0.09)
  • Time to full WB: Primary fusion 12 weeks vs ORIF 16 weeks
  • Wound complications: Primary fusion 9% vs ORIF 32% (p=0.06)
Clinical Implication: Primary subtalar fusion for Sanders IV fractures (especially heavy laborers over 50) achieves better outcomes than ORIF with lower secondary procedure rate.
Limitation: Retrospective, selection bias (older patients selected for fusion). No RCT data available.

Bohler Angle Restoration and Functional Outcome After ORIF

3
Buckley R et al • J Orthop Trauma (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort: 309 Sanders II-IV fractures treated with ORIF
  • Bohler angle restored to over 20 degrees: 78% good/excellent outcomes
  • Bohler angle 10-20 degrees: 58% good/excellent outcomes
  • Bohler angle under 10 degrees: 32% good/excellent outcomes (p less than 0.001)
  • Posterior facet step-off under 2mm: 81% good outcomes vs over 2mm: 52% (p less than 0.01)
  • Multivariate analysis: Bohler angle and step-off independent predictors of outcome
Clinical Implication: Anatomical restoration of Bohler angle (over 20 degrees) and posterior facet (step-off under 2mm) critical for good ORIF outcomes. Accept these as technical goals.
Limitation: Observational study. Fracture severity (Sanders type) confounds relationship - more severe fractures harder to reduce and worse outcomes.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Sanders Classification and Initial Management (Standard, 2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 42-year-old builder presents after falling 3 meters from scaffolding, landing on both feet. He has bilateral heel pain and swelling. X-rays show bilateral calcaneal fractures with loss of Bohler angles. You order CT scans. The right calcaneus shows a single fracture line through the posterior facet on the coronal view (Sanders IIB), and the left shows two fracture lines with three articular fragments (Sanders IIIAB). How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has bilateral displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures - a high-energy injury from axial loading. My immediate priorities are: First, assess for associated injuries - 10% of patients with bilateral calcaneal fractures have lumbar spine fractures, so I would examine the back and order lumbar spine imaging. Second, neurovascular examination of both feet and assess for compartment syndrome (10% risk, clinical diagnosis based on pain with passive toe dorsiflexion and tense compartments). Third, classify the fractures using Sanders CT classification - the right is Sanders Type IIB (single B fracture line, 2 fragments, good surgical candidate) and left is Sanders Type IIIAB (2 fracture lines, 3 fragments, more challenging). My treatment plan: Conservative initial management with strict elevation, NWB, backslab splints, DVT prophylaxis. Delay surgery 10-21 days until swelling resolves (wrinkle test positive). For definitive treatment, I would offer bilateral staged ORIF via extensile lateral approach, operating on one side first (likely the simpler Sanders II right side), then the other side 1-2 weeks later. I would counsel about 20-30% wound complication risk, need for prolonged NWB (6 weeks), and realistic expectations - bilateral fractures have worse outcomes than unilateral, with only 40-50% returning to previous heavy labor work.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Screen for lumbar spine fracture (10-25% with bilateral calcaneal fractures)
Assess for compartment syndrome (clinical diagnosis, urgent fasciotomy if present)
Sanders classification on coronal CT: IIB (good surgical candidate), IIIAB (more complex)
Surgical timing: 10-21 days for swelling resolution, wrinkle test positive
Staged bilateral ORIF (one side at a time, 1-2 week interval)
Realistic counseling: 20-30% wound complications, 40-50% return to heavy labor
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing lumbar spine assessment (critical associated injury)
✗Delaying compartment syndrome recognition (requires urgent fasciotomy)
✗Operating too early (under 10 days increases wound complications 2-fold)
✗Bilateral ORIF same sitting (doubles wound complication risk, prolonged anesthesia)
✗Overly optimistic outcomes counseling (sets up dissatisfaction)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you assess for compartment syndrome in the foot? (Clinical: pain out of proportion, pain with passive toe dorsiflexion, tense compartments. If suspected: urgent fasciotomy of 9 compartments - do not delay for pressure measurement)"
"What is the wrinkle test? (Gently pinch lateral skin over fracture - if skin wrinkles, swelling resolved and safe to operate. If skin tense and shiny, delay surgery)"
"Would you consider conservative management for either side? (Possibly the left Sanders III if patient very high risk, elderly, or bilateral ORIF deemed excessive risk. Sanders II right would benefit most from ORIF)"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: ORIF Surgical Technique - Extensile Lateral Approach (Challenging, 3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"You are performing ORIF for a Sanders Type IIA calcaneal fracture in a 38-year-old patient. Walk me through your surgical approach and reduction technique. The examiner hands you a model calcaneus and asks you to describe the key steps."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this Sanders Type IIA fracture, I would use the extensile lateral approach. Patient positioning: Lateral decubitus with affected side up, knee flexed 30 degrees to relax gastrocnemius, C-arm access confirmed for lateral and axial views. My approach: L-shaped incision with horizontal limb 2cm below fibula tip (from Achilles to calcaneocuboid joint, 8-10cm) and vertical limb curving down to lateral non-weight bearing skin. First, I identify and protect the sural nerve at the posterosuperior corner (1-2cm posterior to fibula). Second, I elevate a full-thickness flap (skin, subcutaneous tissue, periosteum as one layer) off the lateral wall - avoiding undermining to preserve blood supply. Third, I retract peroneal tendons posteriorly and expose the entire lateral wall from calcaneocuboid to posterior tuberosity. For reduction: The Sanders IIA fracture has the A (lateral) fracture line, creating two fragments. First, I restore height by axial traction and elevating the depressed posterior facet using a lamina spreader and dental pick. Second, I reduce the lateral fragment to the sustentaculum medially (the sustentaculum is my stable reference - it stays attached to the talus). Third, I compress the lateral wall medially to restore width. I use K-wires for provisional fixation, then confirm reduction with fluoroscopy - lateral view for Bohler angle (goal over 20 degrees), axial view for width, Broden oblique views for posterior facet step-off (goal under 2mm). For definitive fixation: I apply a lateral calcaneal locking plate (7-9 holes), with key screws from the plate across the fracture into the sustentaculum medially (2-3 screws, 40-50mm length, locking). These sustentaculum screws provide the definitive stability. I close meticulously in layers without tension, use a small drain for 24-48 hours, apply a well-padded backslab splint, and emphasize strict elevation post-operatively to minimize wound complications.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Extensile lateral approach: L-shaped incision 2cm below fibula, full-thickness flap
Protect sural nerve (5-10% injury risk, causes lateral foot numbness)
Reduction sequence: (1) Restore height with distraction, (2) Reduce fragments to sustentaculum, (3) Restore width
Sustentaculum is stable reference - all fragments reduce to it
Goal: Bohler angle over 20 degrees, posterior facet step-off under 2mm
Key fixation: Screws from lateral plate to sustentaculum medially (40-50mm locking screws)
Wound care: Meticulous closure, no tension, drain 24-48h, strict elevation post-op
COMMON TRAPS
✗Undermining skin flap (devascularizes tissue, increases wound complications)
✗Damaging sural nerve (stay 1cm below fibula tip with horizontal incision)
✗Reducing fragments to wrong reference (sustentaculum is the constant - attached to talus)
✗Accepting step-off over 2mm (predicts poor outcome, redo reduction if over 2mm)
✗Missing sustentaculum screw fixation (these are the key screws - without them, fixation fails)
✗Operating on swollen tissue (wrinkle test must be positive, timing 10-21 days)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Sanders IIA fracture pattern specifically? (Single A fracture line - the lateral third line - creating 2 posterior facet fragments. Lateral fragment displaced, medial sustentaculum fragment stable)"
"Why is the sustentaculum the reference for reduction? (It remains attached to the talus via strong interosseous and deltoid ligaments - does not displace. All other fragments are reduced to match this constant position)"
"How do you assess Bohler angle intra-operatively? (Lateral fluoroscopy view: angle formed by line from posterior superior calcaneus to highest point of posterior facet, intersecting line from posterior facet to anterior process. Normal 30-35 degrees, restore to over 20 degrees minimum)"
"What if you cannot achieve reduction? (Consider causes: soft tissue interposition - remove; delayed surgery over 3 weeks - more difficult but persevere; severe comminution Sanders IV - accept imperfect reduction or consider aborting and converting to primary fusion)"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Post-operative Wound Dehiscence Management (Critical, 2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"You performed ORIF via extensile lateral approach for a Sanders IIB calcaneal fracture 2 weeks ago. The patient returns with 3cm wound dehiscence over the lateral incision, exposing the plate but no purulence. The patient is a smoker and diabetic (HbA1c 8.5%). How do you manage this complication?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a wound dehiscence complicating calcaneal ORIF - occurring in 20-30% of cases and higher in this patient with risk factors (smoking, diabetes). My immediate assessment: First, examine the wound - determine depth of dehiscence (superficial vs deep exposing plate), assess for infection (purulence, erythema, warmth, systemic signs), check neurovascular status distally. Second, obtain X-rays to assess fracture position and hardware stability. Third, send wound swab for culture (if any concern for infection) and check inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC). In this case with exposed plate but no purulence, my management approach: Initial conservative wound management is appropriate. I would: (1) Remove skin sutures adjacent to dehiscence to decompress tension, (2) Start local wound care with normal saline irrigation, saline-soaked gauze dressings changed twice daily, (3) Continue strict elevation and NWB, (4) Optimize medical factors - strict diabetic control (target HbA1c under 7%), smoking cessation mandatory, nutrition optimization (albumin over 3.5, consider vitamin C and protein supplementation). If the wound shows signs of healing over 2-3 weeks with granulation tissue, I would continue conservative management with possible negative pressure wound therapy to accelerate closure. If the wound fails to granulate or shows signs of infection, I would proceed to surgical debridement, culture-directed antibiotics, and consider delayed closure techniques (advancement flap or split-thickness skin graft). The plate can be retained if fracture is stable and no deep infection - removing hardware at this stage risks loss of reduction. I would counsel the patient that healing may take 6-12 weeks and accept that some wound complications heal by secondary intention. Long-term, this does not necessarily affect fracture outcome if union is achieved.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Wound dehiscence occurs in 20-30% of calcaneal ORIF (higher with risk factors: smoking, diabetes, obesity)
Assessment: depth of wound, signs of infection, fracture stability on X-ray
Conservative management first: local wound care, saline dressings, strict elevation, optimize medical factors
Medical optimization critical: diabetic control (HbA1c under 7%), smoking cessation, nutrition
Negative pressure wound therapy (VAC) if granulation tissue present
Retain hardware if fracture stable and no deep infection (removing risks loss of reduction)
Surgical options if conservative fails: debridement, delayed closure, flap or skin graft
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to remove hardware (only indicated if deep infection or hardware loose - retain if stable)
✗Missing deep infection signs (fever, elevated CRP, purulence - needs debridement and antibiotics)
✗Inadequate medical optimization (diabetic control and smoking cessation critical for healing)
✗Premature surgical closure (high risk re-dehiscence if done before wound bed healthy)
✗Not counseling patient about prolonged healing (wounds may take 6-12 weeks, some heal by secondary intention)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When would you remove the hardware? (Only if: (1) Deep infection not responding to antibiotics and debridement, (2) Hardware loosening causing instability, (3) Fracture already healed in acceptable position. Otherwise retain hardware to maintain reduction)"
"What if there is purulent drainage? (This suggests infection - obtain cultures, start empiric antibiotics covering Staph (flucloxacillin or vancomycin if MRSA risk), proceed to surgical debridement and washout, culture-directed antibiotics, consider retaining hardware if stable)"
"Would you consider converting to a flap earlier? (Flap coverage (sural artery flap, free flap) considered if: (1) Large defect over 5cm, (2) Exposed bone/hardware not granulating after 4-6 weeks conservative care, (3) Deep infection requiring debridement leaving large defect. Avoid flaps as first-line due to donor site morbidity)"

MCQ Practice Points

Sanders Classification Question

Q: On which imaging view is the Sanders classification of calcaneal fractures determined?

A: Coronal CT through the widest portion of the posterior facet of the calcaneus. The classification is based on the number of articular fragments created by fracture lines on this single critical coronal slice. Type I = non-displaced (any number of lines), Type II = 1 fracture line (2 fragments), Type III = 2 fracture lines (3 fragments), Type IV = comminuted (over 3 fragments). Subtypes (IIA, IIB, IIC, etc.) based on which fracture lines (A=lateral, B=central, C=medial) are present.

Bohler Angle Question

Q: What is the normal range for Bohler angle, and what value predicts poor outcome with conservative management?

A: Normal Bohler angle is 20-40 degrees (typically 30-35 degrees). Measured on lateral foot radiograph as the angle formed by: (1) line from posterior superior calcaneus to highest point of posterior facet, intersecting (2) line from highest point of posterior facet to anterior process. Bohler angle under 20 degrees (especially under 10 degrees) predicts poor functional outcome with conservative management, indicating significant loss of calcaneal height. ORIF goal is restoration to over 20 degrees minimum.

ORIF Timing Question

Q: What is the optimal timing for ORIF of calcaneal fractures and why?

A: Optimal timing is 10-21 days post-injury. Rationale: Allow soft tissue swelling to resolve to minimize wound complications (20-30% rate, increases to 40-50% if surgery under 7 days). The wrinkle test determines readiness - gently pinch lateral skin; if wrinkles form, swelling resolved and safe to operate. Early surgery (under 7 days) has double the wound complication rate. Delayed surgery (over 3 weeks) makes reduction more difficult due to early fracture healing and fibrous tissue formation. The window of 10-21 days balances wound healing risk against ease of reduction.

Compartment Syndrome Question

Q: What is the incidence of compartment syndrome with calcaneal fractures and how is it diagnosed?

A: 10% of calcaneal fractures develop acute compartment syndrome - highest rate of any foot injury. This is a clinical diagnosis based on: (1) Pain out of proportion to injury, (2) Pain with passive toe dorsiflexion (stretches deep flexor muscles in deep compartments), (3) Tense, swollen foot. Key point: pulses are usually present (compartment syndrome is increased pressure in fascial compartments, not arterial occlusion). Do not delay for pressure measurements if clinically suspected. Treatment: urgent fasciotomy of all 9 foot compartments (medial, lateral, superficial central, deep central, 4 interosseous, calcaneal). Delay over 6 hours causes irreversible muscle necrosis leading to clawing, contractures, chronic pain.

ORCA Trial Question

Q: What were the key findings of the ORCA trial comparing ORIF vs conservative management for displaced calcaneal fractures?

A: The ORCA trial (2014, BMJ) was a multicenter RCT of 151 patients with Sanders II-IV displaced fractures. Key findings: (1) No significant difference in primary outcome (SF-36 Physical Component Score at 2 years: ORIF 69 vs conservative 65, p=0.06), (2) ORIF had higher return to work rate: 87% vs 68% returned to same job (p=0.02), (3) ORIF had 17% wound complications vs 0% conservative, (4) Subtalar fusion rate similar: 8% ORIF vs 12% conservative (NS). Clinical implication: ORIF benefits working-age patients for return to work but carries wound complication risk. Patient selection critical - greatest benefit in younger patients (under 60) with Sanders II-III fractures who can comply with NWB protocol.

Primary Fusion Question

Q: In which patients should primary subtalar fusion be considered instead of ORIF for calcaneal fractures?

A: Primary subtalar fusion indications: (1) Sanders Type IV fractures in heavy laborers over 50 years, (2) Severe comminution precluding stable fixation, (3) Pre-existing subtalar arthritis. Rationale: Sanders IV fractures have poor outcomes with any treatment (50-60% ORIF vs 40-50% conservative), and 50% progress to subtalar fusion within 2 years after ORIF. Primary fusion achieves the same endpoint (fused subtalar joint) in one surgery, avoiding failed ORIF and secondary fusion. Evidence: Radnay et al (2009) showed primary fusion for Sanders IV achieved better outcomes (AOFAS 72 vs 58) and lower secondary procedure rate (13% vs 63%) compared to ORIF. Consider especially in manual laborers who need to return to heavy work.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Epidemiology

Calcaneal fracture data:

  • 2.1 per 100,000 population annually (Australia)
  • Peak age 35-45 years (working-age males)
  • Falls from height (construction): 65%
  • Motor vehicle accidents: 20%
  • Workers compensation: 70% of cases involve workplace injury

Economic impact:

  • Average healthcare cost: 75,000-90,000 AUD per patient
  • Lost productivity: 120,000-200,000 AUD (if cannot return to work)
  • Permanent impairment rating: 15-30% lower limb (bilateral 30-50%)

Australian Guidelines and Standards

ACSQHC Standards:

  • VTE prophylaxis mandatory (immobilized lower limb fracture)
  • Pharmacological: LMWH (enoxaparin 40mg daily) or DOAC
  • Duration: Until mobile or 35 days (whichever sooner)
  • High-risk patients: Extended prophylaxis 6 weeks

eTG Antibiotic Guidelines (prophylaxis for ORIF):

  • Cefazolin 2g IV at induction (single dose)
  • If penicillin allergic: Vancomycin 1.5g IV
  • Diabetes/high BMI: Consider additional dose at 4 hours

Medicolegal Documentation Requirements

Critical documentation for calcaneal fracture management:

Consent discussion (must document):

  • Wound complication risk 20-30% (higher with smoking, diabetes)
  • Infection risk 5-10%
  • Nerve injury (sural nerve) 5-10%
  • Subtalar arthritis 30-50% by 5 years (disease progression, not surgical failure)
  • Need for future subtalar fusion 15-25%
  • Alternative treatments discussed (conservative, primary fusion)
  • Realistic return to work expectations (40-60% return to heavy labor)

Operative documentation (critical details):

  • Pre-operative soft tissue assessment (wrinkle test positive, no fracture blisters)
  • Fluoroscopy-confirmed reduction (Bohler angle, step-off measurement)
  • Hardware used (plate type, screw sizes and positions)
  • Intra-operative complications and management
  • Estimated blood loss, tourniquet time
  • Post-operative instructions (NWB duration, elevation, wound check timing)

Common litigation issues:

  1. Wound complications not consented - patients surprised by dehiscence
  2. Compartment syndrome missed - delayed fasciotomy with permanent damage
  3. Operating too early - swelling present, wound breakdown blamed on timing
  4. Poor functional outcome - patient expected return to normal (unrealistic expectations)

Protection: Document detailed consent, realistic outcome discussion, appropriate timing (wrinkle test), and compartment syndrome surveillance in first 48 hours.

Calcaneal Fractures

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Posterior facet = 80% weight bearing surface, articular with talus
  • •Sustentaculum tali = medial shelf, attached to talus (stable reference for reduction)
  • •Bohler angle = 20-40 degrees normal, under 20 degrees poor outcome
  • •Gissane angle (critical angle) = 120-145 degrees normal
  • •Sural nerve = 1-2cm posterior to fibula, at risk in extensile lateral approach
  • •Lateral calcaneal artery = from peroneal, supplies lateral wall and skin

Sanders Classification (CT Coronal View)

  • •Type I = Non-displaced (any lines), conservative, 85-90% good outcomes
  • •Type II = 1 fracture line, 2 fragments (IIA lateral, IIB central, IIC medial), ORIF, 75-85% good outcomes
  • •Type III = 2 fracture lines, 3 fragments (AB, AC, BC, ABC), ORIF, 60-70% good outcomes
  • •Type IV = Comminuted over 3 fragments, conservative or primary fusion, 40-50% good outcomes
  • •Coronal slice through WIDEST posterior facet used for classification

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Sanders I → Conservative (NWB 6 weeks, boot)
  • •Sanders II-III active under 60 years → ORIF extensile lateral at 10-21 days
  • •Sanders II simple pattern → Consider sinus tarsi approach (lower wound complications)
  • •Sanders IV heavy laborer over 50 years → Primary subtalar fusion
  • •Sanders IV elderly low-demand → Conservative
  • •ORIF timing = 10-21 days (wrinkle test positive), early surgery doubles wound complications

ORIF Surgical Pearls

  • •Extensile lateral approach: L-shaped incision, full-thickness flap (no undermining)
  • •Protect sural nerve (1cm below fibula tip with horizontal limb)
  • •Reduction sequence: (1) Height (distraction), (2) Posterior facet to sustentaculum, (3) Width
  • •Goal: Bohler angle over 20 degrees, step-off under 2mm
  • •Key fixation: Screws from lateral plate to sustentaculum medially (40-50mm locking)
  • •Closure: Meticulous, no tension, drain 24-48h, strict elevation post-op

Complications

  • •Wound dehiscence = 20-30% (ORIF), higher with smoking/diabetes/obesity/early surgery
  • •Compartment syndrome = 10%, clinical diagnosis, pain with passive toe dorsiflexion, urgent fasciotomy 9 compartments
  • •Sural nerve injury = 5-10%, lateral foot numbness
  • •Subtalar arthritis = 30-50% by 5 years (disease, not treatment failure), 15-25% need fusion
  • •Infection = 5-10% superficial, 2-5% deep
  • •Chronic pain = 30-40% despite anatomical reduction
Quick Stats
Reading Time200 min
Related Topics

Achilles Tendon Rupture

Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Diabetic Foot Infections