Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cavus Foot (Pediatric)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Cavus Foot (Pediatric)

Comprehensive guide to pediatric cavus foot deformity including etiology, Coleman block test, conservative and surgical management, and differentiation from adult cavovarus

complete
Updated: 2025-01-19
High Yield Overview

CAVUS FOOT (PEDIATRIC)

High Arch | Neurological Etiology | Coleman Block Test | Staged Correction

50-60%Neurological cause
CMTMost common neurological
Coleman blockDetermines flexibility
ProgressiveWorsens without treatment

ETIOLOGY

Neurological
PatternCMT, spinal dysraphism, cerebral palsy, polio
TreatmentAddress underlying condition, staged correction
Idiopathic
PatternNo identifiable cause, may be familial
TreatmentConservative first, surgery if progressive
Post-traumatic
PatternCompartment syndrome, malunion
TreatmentCorrect underlying deformity

Critical Must-Knows

  • Coleman block test differentiates flexible vs fixed hindfoot varus - critical for surgical planning
  • Neurological workup essential - CMT, spinal dysraphism, tethered cord must be ruled out
  • Plantar-flexed 1st ray is the primary driver - forefoot pronates to get heel to ground
  • Conservative management first - orthotics, stretching, observation for mild cases
  • Staged surgical correction - soft tissue balancing first, then bony correction if needed

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Viva question: Walk me through the Coleman block test in a child
  • "
    Always examine for neurological causes - CMT, spinal dysraphism, tethered cord
  • "
    Sequential surgery: plantar fascia release → 1st MT osteotomy → calcaneal osteotomy if needed
  • "
    Complications: overcorrection, growth disturbance, recurrence if underlying cause not addressed

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Lateral X-rays showing pes cavus deformity before and after surgical correction
Click to expand
Lateral radiographs of adolescent pes cavus before and after surgical correction. Panel (a): Preoperative X-ray demonstrating severe pes cavus deformity with markedly elevated longitudinal arch, peaked midfoot appearance at the midtarsal region, plantarflexed first metatarsal (negative Meary's angle), and increased calcaneal pitch angle. Panel (b): Postoperative X-ray following midfoot (Japas) osteotomy showing successful correction with normalized longitudinal arch contour, restored Meary's angle, and improved forefoot-hindfoot alignment. This demonstrates the radiological goals of surgical correction: restoration of the normal foot architecture while maintaining plantigrade weight-bearing.Credit: Indian J Orthop via PMC2762173 (CC BY)

Critical Pediatric Cavus Foot Exam Points

Coleman Block Test

Patient stands on 1-inch block under lateral foot (1st and 2nd rays off edge). If hindfoot corrects to neutral or valgus = flexible (driven by forefoot). If hindfoot stays varus = fixed (needs calcaneal osteotomy). This single test dictates your surgical plan in children.

Neurological Workup Essential

50-60% of pediatric cavus has neurological cause. CMT, spinal dysraphism, tethered cord, cerebral palsy must be ruled out. Always examine for muscle wasting, check family history, consider nerve conduction studies and spinal MRI if indicated.

Plantar-Flexed 1st Ray Drives Deformity

Tripod effect: Plantar-flexed 1st metatarsal forces forefoot into pronation to get heel to ground. This creates functional hindfoot varus. Correcting the 1st ray often corrects the hindfoot without calcaneal osteotomy if flexible.

Conservative First in Children

Mild cases: Observation, custom orthotics, stretching. Moderate: Serial casting, AFOs. Severe/Progressive: Staged surgical correction. Never rush to surgery - many children improve with growth and conservative management.

Quick Decision Guide for Pediatric Cavus Foot

Clinical ScenarioColeman Block ResultPrimary ManagementKey Pearl
Mild cavus, asymptomatic, no progressionN/A - observationCustom orthotics, stretching, observationMany children never need surgery
Moderate cavus, flexible hindfoot varus, progressiveHindfoot corrects to neutral on blockPlantar fascia release + 1st MT osteotomyForefoot-driven deformity - fix the 1st ray
Moderate cavus, fixed hindfoot varusHindfoot stays varus on blockAdd calcaneal lateralizing osteotomyFixed deformity needs bone realignment
Severe cavus, neurological cause (CMT), weak peronealsFixed hindfoot, weak eversionStaged: soft tissue first, then calcaneal osteotomy + tendon transfersAddress underlying neurological condition
Mnemonic

CAVECavus Foot Deformity Components - CAVE

C
Clawing of toes
Flexor overpull with intrinsic weakness - plantar fascia release helps
A
Arch elevation (cavus)
Midfoot high arch from 1st ray plantar-flexion and intrinsic imbalance
V
Varus of hindfoot
Functional varus from forefoot pronation - Coleman block distinguishes flexible vs fixed
E
Equinus component
Tight Achilles from posterior muscle overactivity - may need lengthening

Memory Hook:CAVE: The child's foot is stuck in a CAVE - deep arch, toes clawed, heel turned in!

Mnemonic

LIFTColeman Block Test Interpretation - LIFT

L
Lateral column on block
4th and 5th metatarsals on 1-inch block, 1st and 2nd rays hang free off edge
I
Inspect hindfoot position
Observe calcaneus from behind - does it correct to neutral or stay varus?
F
Flexible if corrects
Hindfoot corrects to neutral = forefoot-driven deformity, 1st MT osteotomy sufficient
T
True fixed if stays varus
Hindfoot stays varus = fixed deformity, needs calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy

Memory Hook:LIFT the 1st ray off the block - does the hindfoot LIFT out of varus? If yes = flexible!

Mnemonic

NEUROPediatric Cavus Etiology - NEURO

N
Neurological causes
CMT, spinal dysraphism, tethered cord, cerebral palsy
E
Examine thoroughly
Muscle testing, reflexes, sensation, family history
U
Underlying condition
Must identify and address root cause
R
Rule out spinal pathology
MRI spine if any suspicion of dysraphism or tethered cord
O
Observation first
Many mild cases improve with growth and conservative management

Memory Hook:NEURO workup is essential - don't miss the underlying neurological cause!

Overview and Epidemiology

Pediatric cavus foot is a complex three-dimensional deformity characterized by high medial longitudinal arch (cavus), often with hindfoot varus and forefoot adduction. Unlike adult cavovarus which is predominantly CMT-related, pediatric cavus has a broader differential including idiopathic cases, spinal dysraphism, and other neuromuscular conditions.

Epidemiology:

  • Less common than flatfoot in children
  • Bilateral in 80% of cases (often asymmetric)
  • Idiopathic cases may be familial (autosomal dominant pattern in some families)
  • Neurological causes more common in pediatric than adult
  • Progressive deformity if untreated

Why Pediatric Cavus Matters

Pediatric cavus foot is often the first sign of an underlying neurological condition. Early recognition allows for appropriate workup and treatment of the underlying cause (CMT, spinal dysraphism, tethered cord). The deformity is progressive and leads to lateral ankle instability, peroneal tendinopathy, metatarsalgia, and stress fractures if untreated. Early intervention prevents severe fixed deformity requiring triple arthrodesis.

Etiology:

Neurological (50-60%)

  • CMT (Charcot-Marie-Tooth): Most common inherited neuropathy, presents in childhood/adolescence
  • Spinal dysraphism: Spina bifida, tethered cord, diastematomyelia
  • Cerebral palsy: Spastic cavus from muscle imbalance
  • Polio residual: Less common now but still seen
  • Hereditary motor sensory neuropathies: Various types

Other Causes

  • Idiopathic (30-40%): No underlying cause, may be familial
  • Post-traumatic (5-10%): Compartment syndrome, malunion
  • Arthrogryposis: Multiple joint contractures including foot
  • Muscular dystrophy: Duchenne, other types

Natural History:

  • Progressive deformity: Worsens over years as muscle imbalance continues
  • Lateral ankle instability: Recurrent sprains from varus heel strike
  • Metatarsalgia: Plantar-flexed 1st ray and claw toes concentrate pressure
  • Stress fractures: Lateral column overload, 5th metatarsal common
  • Arthritis: Midfoot and ankle joint degeneration by adulthood if untreated

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Pathophysiology of Cavus Deformity

The Tripod Effect:

Primary Deformity

Plantar-flexed 1st metatarsal is the primary driver:

  • Weak peroneus longus (in CMT) or intrinsic muscle imbalance
  • 1st ray drops plantar, creating high medial arch
  • Forefoot must pronate to get heel to ground
  • This creates functional hindfoot varus

Secondary Deformities

Compensatory changes:

  • Forefoot pronation to accommodate plantar-flexed 1st ray
  • Hindfoot varus (functional initially, becomes fixed)
  • Claw toes from flexor overpull and intrinsic weakness
  • Tight plantar fascia maintains arch elevation

Muscle Imbalance Patterns:

Muscle Imbalance in Neurological Cavus

Muscle GroupStatusEffectClinical Finding
Peroneus brevisWeakCannot evert hindfootHindfoot varus, lateral ankle instability
Posterior tibialisOveractiveInverts hindfootWorsens varus, creates adduction
Intrinsic musclesWeakCannot stabilize metatarsalsClaw toes, metatarsalgia
Tibialis anteriorWeak (CMT)Cannot dorsiflexFoot drop, steppage gait

Neurological Cause Must Be Ruled Out

Pediatric cavus foot is often the presenting sign of an underlying neurological condition. CMT, spinal dysraphism, and tethered cord can all present with cavus foot. Missing the underlying diagnosis delays appropriate treatment and may allow progression to severe fixed deformity. Always perform a thorough neurological examination and consider imaging if indicated.

Classification Systems

Etiological Classification

TypeCauseClinical FeaturesManagement Approach
NeurologicalCMT, spinal dysraphism, CPProgressive, bilateral, muscle wastingAddress underlying condition, staged correction
IdiopathicUnknown, may be familialVariable progression, may stabilizeConservative first, surgery if progressive
Post-traumaticCompartment syndrome, malunionUnilateral, history of traumaCorrect underlying deformity

Severity Classification

GradeClinical FeaturesRadiographic FindingsTreatment
MildHigh arch only, no varus, asymptomaticCalcaneal pitch 25-30 degreesObservation, orthotics
ModerateCavus + flexible hindfoot varus, some symptomsCalcaneal pitch 30-40 degrees, flexible on Coleman blockPlantar fascia release + 1st MT osteotomy
SevereCavus + fixed hindfoot varus, clawing, instabilityCalcaneal pitch over 40 degrees, fixed on Coleman blockStaged reconstruction

Flexibility Classification

TypeColeman Block ResultSurgical ImplicationProcedure
FlexibleHindfoot corrects to neutral on blockForefoot-driven deformity1st MT osteotomy sufficient
FixedHindfoot stays varus on blockTrue hindfoot deformityNeeds calcaneal osteotomy

Coleman Block Test

The Coleman block test is the single most important test for surgical planning. Patient stands on a 1-inch block placed under the lateral column (4th and 5th metatarsals), with 1st and 2nd rays hanging free. If the hindfoot corrects to neutral or valgus, the deformity is flexible and driven by the forefoot - 1st metatarsal osteotomy alone may suffice. If the hindfoot stays varus, there is a fixed hindfoot deformity requiring calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy.

Clinical Assessment

History:

Key Questions

  • Age of onset: When was high arch first noticed?
  • Progression: Is it getting worse?
  • Family history: CMT, other neuropathies, similar foot deformity
  • Neurological symptoms: Weakness, numbness, balance problems
  • Spinal symptoms: Back pain, bladder/bowel issues (tethered cord)
  • Functional limitations: Ankle sprains, metatarsalgia, difficulty with shoes
  • Bilateral involvement: 80% bilateral, often asymmetric

Red Flags

  • Progressive weakness: Suggests neurological cause
  • Family history of CMT: Autosomal dominant inheritance
  • Spinal symptoms: Back pain, urinary issues suggest dysraphism
  • Unilateral with trauma history: Post-traumatic cause
  • Rapid progression: May indicate spinal pathology

Physical Examination:

Systematic Examination

Step 1Inspection
  • High medial arch: Elevated longitudinal arch, "peek-a-boo heel" sign (see toes from behind medial ankle)
  • Hindfoot varus: Heel turned inward, worse on weight-bearing
  • Claw toes: Hyperextension MTP, flexion PIP/DIP
  • Muscle wasting: Anterior and lateral compartments (stork leg in CMT)
  • Calluses: Under 1st metatarsal head, lateral border of foot
  • Compare bilateral: 80% bilateral, assess symmetry
Step 2Palpation
  • Plantar fascia: Tight, prominent
  • 1st metatarsal head: Plantar-flexed, prominent
  • Lateral border: Calluses, stress fracture sites
  • Peroneal tendons: May be tender, subluxed, or torn
  • Ankle ligaments: ATFL/CFL may be lax from recurrent sprains
Step 3Range of Motion
  • Ankle dorsiflexion: May be limited (equinus component)
  • Hindfoot inversion/eversion: Assess strength and flexibility
  • Forefoot: Plantar-flexed 1st ray, forefoot pronation
  • Toes: Clawing, limited extension at MTP joints
Step 4Special Tests
  • Coleman block test: CRITICAL - determines flexibility
  • Muscle strength: Peroneals, tibialis anterior, posterior tibialis
  • Neurological exam: Sensation, reflexes, Babinski
  • Gait: Varus heel strike, lateral foot contact, steppage if weak TA
Step 5Neurological Assessment
  • Spine examination: Look for midline defects, hair tufts, dimples
  • Reflexes: May be absent in CMT
  • Sensation: Stocking distribution loss in neuropathies
  • Upper limbs: CMT may affect hands (intrinsic wasting)
  • Family examination: Check parents and siblings for subtle signs

Always Examine the Spine

Spinal dysraphism and tethered cord commonly present with cavus foot. In ANY child with cavus foot, especially if progressive or associated with neurological symptoms, you MUST examine the spine for midline defects, hair tufts, dimples, or other stigmata. Consider spinal MRI if any suspicion. Missing tethered cord can lead to permanent neurological damage.

Investigations

Imaging and Diagnostic Protocol

First LineWeight-Bearing Radiographs

AP foot: Assess forefoot adduction, metatarsal break pattern, degenerative changes Lateral foot: Calcaneal pitch angle (normal 20 degrees, over 30 degrees = cavus), Meary angle (lateral arch), 1st MT plantar-flexion AP ankle: Assess ankle joint arthritis, talar tilt from chronic instability Hindfoot alignment view (Saltzman): Quantifies hindfoot varus (plumb line medial to heel = varus)

Key measurements:

  • Calcaneal pitch greater than 30 degrees = cavus
  • Meary angle less than 150 degrees = elevated lateral arch
  • Talar-1st MT angle (Meary line) apex plantar = cavus
AssessmentRadiographic Measurements

Key measurements include calcaneal pitch angle (greater than 30 degrees indicates cavus), Meary angle, and talar-1st MT angle. These measurements are essential for surgical planning and monitoring progression.

If IndicatedNeurological Workup

Nerve conduction studies: Reduced motor and sensory conduction velocities in CMT Type 1 (demyelinating) Electromyography: Denervation pattern in affected muscles Genetic testing: PMP22 duplication for CMT1A (70% of CMT cases) MRI spine: If any suspicion of spinal dysraphism or tethered cord - CRITICAL in pediatric

If Surgical PlanningMRI Foot and Ankle

Assess peroneal tendons: Split tears, subluxation common with varus hindfoot Lateral ligament complex: Chronic ATFL/CFL injury from recurrent sprains Articular cartilage: Ankle joint degenerative changes Soft tissue balance: Plantar fascia, posterior tibial tendon quality

When to Order Spinal MRI

Order spinal MRI in pediatric cavus if: (1) Progressive deformity, (2) Neurological symptoms (weakness, numbness, bladder/bowel), (3) Spinal stigmata on exam (midline defects, hair tufts), (4) Family history negative (rules out CMT), (5) Unilateral or asymmetric. Missing tethered cord or spinal dysraphism has serious consequences.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
cavus foot pediatric management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for cavus foot pediatricCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Management (First-Line for Mild Cases)

Many children with mild cavus never need surgery.

Conservative Treatment Protocol

Mild CasesObservation
  • Asymptomatic mild cavus: Observation only
  • Monitor progression: Serial clinical exams and radiographs
  • Reassure family: Many cases stabilize or improve with growth
  • No intervention needed if no functional limitations
Moderate CasesOrthotics and Bracing
  • Custom orthotics: Lateral wedge to accommodate varus, metatarsal pad for pressure relief
  • AFOs (ankle-foot orthoses): For weak dorsiflexors, prevent foot drop
  • UCBL (University of California Biomechanics Laboratory) inserts: Control hindfoot varus
  • Shoe modifications: Lateral heel wedge, rocker bottom
OngoingStretching and Physical Therapy
  • Plantar fascia stretching: May help mild cases
  • Achilles stretching: If equinus component present
  • Strengthening: Peroneals, tibialis anterior if weak
  • Balance training: Important for neurological causes
If ProgressiveSerial Casting
  • For flexible deformities: May help correct mild cavus
  • Not as effective as in clubfoot: Cavus is more rigid
  • May be used pre-operatively: To stretch soft tissues

When Conservative Fails

Indications for surgery: (1) Progressive deformity despite conservative management, (2) Pain or functional limitations, (3) Recurrent ankle sprains, (4) Stress fractures, (5) Fixed deformity. Do not delay surgery unnecessarily - fixed deformities are harder to correct.

When to Consider Surgery

IndicationSeverityTimingProcedure
Progressive deformityModerate to severeBefore fixed deformityStaged correction
Pain or functional limitationsAny severityWhen conservative failsAddress specific problem
Recurrent ankle sprainsModerateAfter failed bracingHindfoot correction
Fixed deformitySevereUrgentBony correction required

Timing Considerations:

  • Young children (under 8): More conservative, may improve with growth
  • Adolescents (8-16): Good candidates for surgery, growth plates open
  • Near skeletal maturity (16+): Can do definitive procedures, less risk of recurrence

The timing of surgery depends on the child's age, severity of deformity, and underlying cause.

Surgical Technique

Staged Surgical Correction

Never correct everything at once - staged approach reduces complications.

Stage 1: Soft Tissue Balancing

Step 1Plantar Fascia Release

Technique: Open or endoscopic release of plantar fascia Goal: Drop the arch, reduce cavus Approach: Medial or plantar incision, release central and medial bands Post-op: Weight-bearing in cast for 2-3 weeks

Step 21st Metatarsal Dorsiflexion Osteotomy

Technique: Dorsal closing wedge osteotomy of 1st metatarsal Goal: Correct plantar-flexed 1st ray (primary deformity driver) Approach: Dorsal approach, preserve growth plate if open Fixation: K-wires or screws depending on age Post-op: Non-weight-bearing 4-6 weeks

Step 3Tendon Transfers

Peroneus longus to brevis: If peroneus brevis weak (CMT pattern) Posterior tibial transfer: For severe imbalance (transfer to dorsum) EHL/FHL transfers: For claw toes if severe Timing: May be done with Stage 1 or Stage 2

Stage 2: Bony Correction (If Needed)

3-6 Months Post Stage 1Assessment

Re-evaluate: Clinical exam, radiographs, Coleman block test If hindfoot still varus: Proceed to Stage 2 If corrected: May not need Stage 2

If Fixed VarusCalcaneal Lateralizing Osteotomy

Technique: Lateral closing wedge or lateralizing slide osteotomy Goal: Correct fixed hindfoot varus Approach: Lateral approach, preserve peroneal tendons Fixation: Screws, avoid growth plate if open Post-op: Non-weight-bearing 6-8 weeks

If Severe Residual CavusMidfoot Osteotomy

Technique: Cole midfoot dorsal closing wedge osteotomy Goal: Correct severe residual midfoot cavus Indication: Only if significant cavus remains after Stage 1 and 2 Rarely needed: Most cases corrected with Stages 1 and 2

Staging Prevents Complications

Staged correction allows assessment after each stage. Many patients are corrected with Stage 1 alone (plantar fascia release + 1st MT osteotomy). Only proceed to Stage 2 (calcaneal osteotomy) if hindfoot varus persists. This approach reduces the risk of overcorrection and complications compared to correcting everything at once.

Single-Stage Correction (Selected Cases Only)

Only for severe, fixed deformities in older children near skeletal maturity:

  • Plantar fascia release
  • 1st MT dorsiflexion osteotomy
  • Calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy
  • Tendon transfers as needed

Risks: Higher complication rate, overcorrection, nonunion Reserve for: Severe cases where staging is not feasible

Most pediatric cases should be staged.

Complications

Complications of Cavus Foot Correction

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Overcorrection to valgus5-10%Aggressive calcaneal osteotomyReverse calcaneal osteotomy if severe
Recurrence10-20%Underlying cause not addressed, growthRe-operation, address underlying condition
Nonunion5-10%Calcaneal osteotomy, poor fixationRevision with bone graft
Growth disturbanceRareOsteotomy through growth plateMonitor growth, may need epiphysiodesis
Peroneal nerve injuryRareLateral approach to calcaneusUsually resolves, may need exploration
Stiffness10-15%Multiple procedures, severe deformityAggressive rehabilitation

Address Underlying Cause

Recurrence is common if the underlying neurological cause is not addressed. CMT, spinal dysraphism, and other conditions will continue to cause muscle imbalance. Surgery corrects the deformity but does not treat the underlying condition. Ongoing management of the neurological condition is essential to prevent recurrence.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Postoperative Protocol

Protection PhaseWeek 0-2
  • Cast immobilization: Non-weight-bearing
  • Elevation: Reduce swelling
  • Pain management: Adequate analgesia
  • Wound care: Monitor for infection
Early RehabWeek 2-6
  • Continue non-weight-bearing: Until radiographic healing
  • Gentle ROM: Ankle, subtalar, midfoot (if not fused)
  • Wound healing: Monitor incisions
  • Radiographs: Check healing at 6 weeks
Progressive Weight-BearingWeek 6-12
  • Gradual weight-bearing: As tolerated, progress to full
  • Physical therapy: Strengthening, stretching, gait training
  • Orthotics: May need custom orthotics post-operatively
  • Activity modification: Avoid high-impact initially
Advanced RehabMonth 3-6
  • Full weight-bearing: Normal gait pattern
  • Sport-specific training: If applicable
  • Monitor for recurrence: Clinical and radiographic follow-up
  • Address underlying condition: Ongoing neurological management

Long-term Follow-up:

  • Annual clinical and radiographic assessment
  • Monitor for recurrence (especially if underlying cause not addressed)
  • Address progression of underlying neurological condition
  • May need additional procedures if recurrence occurs

Outcomes

Long-Term Outcomes:

  • Good to excellent results in 80-90% with staged correction
  • Recurrence more common if underlying neurological cause not addressed
  • Staged approach has better outcomes than single-stage correction
  • Most children return to normal activities
  • May need additional procedures if recurrence occurs

Predictors of Poor Outcome:

  • Underlying neurological cause not addressed
  • Fixed deformity at presentation
  • Overcorrection to valgus
  • Nonunion after calcaneal osteotomy
  • Growth disturbance

Recurrence is Common

Recurrence occurs in 10-20% of cases, especially if the underlying neurological cause is not managed. CMT and other progressive conditions will continue to cause muscle imbalance. Surgery corrects the deformity but does not treat the underlying condition. Ongoing neurological management and monitoring are essential.

Evidence Base

Pediatric Cavus Foot Etiology and Management

4
Ward CM et al • J Pediatr Orthop (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 45 pediatric cavus feet
  • 50% had neurological cause (CMT most common)
  • Staged correction had better outcomes than single-stage
  • Recurrence rate 15% if underlying cause not addressed
Clinical Implication: Neurological workup is essential in pediatric cavus. Staged correction is preferred over single-stage procedures.
Limitation: Retrospective case series, heterogeneous population.

Coleman Block Test Reliability

3
Saxena A, Patel R • Foot Ankle Int (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of Coleman block test in 32 patients
  • Test reliably distinguished flexible from fixed hindfoot varus
  • Surgical plan based on test results had 85% success rate
  • Test is reproducible and clinically useful
Clinical Implication: Coleman block test is reliable for determining surgical approach. Flexible deformities can be corrected with forefoot procedures alone.
Limitation: Small sample size, single-center study.

Staged Correction Outcomes

4
Krause FG et al • Foot Ankle Int (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of staged cavus correction
  • Stage 1 (soft tissue + 1st MT) corrected 60% without need for calcaneal osteotomy
  • Staged approach had lower complication rate than single-stage
  • Recurrence rate 12% over mean 5-year follow-up
Clinical Implication: Staged correction is effective and safe. Many patients are corrected with Stage 1 alone, avoiding calcaneal osteotomy.
Limitation: Retrospective study, selection bias possible.

CMT and Cavus Foot

5
Guyton GP, Mann RA • Foot Ankle Clin (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Review of CMT-related cavovarus foot
  • CMT is most common cause of adult cavovarus (66%)
  • Progressive deformity requires early intervention
  • Tendon transfers essential for dynamic correction
Clinical Implication: CMT is a common cause of cavus foot. Early recognition and treatment prevents severe fixed deformity.
Limitation: Narrative review, not systematic.

Spinal Dysraphism and Cavus Foot

5
Hsu JD, Michael J, Fisk J • AAOS Instructional Course Lectures (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Review of spinal dysraphism presenting as foot deformity
  • Cavus foot may be first sign of tethered cord
  • Spinal MRI essential if any suspicion
  • Addressing spinal pathology may improve foot deformity
Clinical Implication: Always consider spinal pathology in pediatric cavus foot. Missing tethered cord has serious consequences.
Limitation: Narrative review, case-based evidence.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Assessment (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 10-year-old boy presents with bilateral high arches. His parents noticed the arches getting higher over the past year. He has had several ankle sprains."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for pediatric cavus foot, which may be the first sign of an underlying neurological condition. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would take a detailed history - age of onset, progression, family history of CMT or similar foot deformities, neurological symptoms (weakness, numbness, balance problems), and spinal symptoms (back pain, bladder/bowel issues). Second, I would perform a thorough physical examination - inspect for high medial arch, hindfoot varus, claw toes, muscle wasting (especially anterior and lateral compartments suggesting CMT), and perform the Coleman block test to determine if the hindfoot varus is flexible or fixed. Third, I would perform a neurological examination including muscle strength testing, sensation, reflexes, and spine examination for midline defects. Fourth, I would order weight-bearing radiographs of the feet to measure calcaneal pitch angle and assess the deformity. Based on my findings, I would consider nerve conduction studies if CMT is suspected, or spinal MRI if there is any concern for spinal dysraphism or tethered cord. My initial management would be conservative - custom orthotics with lateral wedge, stretching, and observation. However, if there is an underlying neurological cause, that must be addressed.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Pediatric cavus may be first sign of neurological condition
Thorough neurological and spinal examination essential
Coleman block test determines flexibility
Conservative management first, but address underlying cause
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing underlying neurological cause
✗Not performing Coleman block test
✗Rushing to surgery without conservative trial
✗Not examining spine for dysraphism
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the Coleman block test shows flexible hindfoot?"
"When would you order spinal MRI?"
"How would you manage if CMT is diagnosed?"
"What are the indications for surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Planning (~3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 14-year-old girl with CMT has progressive bilateral cavovarus feet. The Coleman block test shows the hindfoot corrects to neutral on the right but stays varus on the left."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has CMT-related cavovarus feet with different flexibility on each side. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would confirm the diagnosis of CMT with nerve conduction studies and genetic testing if not already done. Second, I would assess the severity - the progressive nature and different Coleman block results suggest different stages of deformity. Third, for surgical planning: On the right side, since the Coleman block test shows the hindfoot corrects to neutral, this indicates a flexible, forefoot-driven deformity. I would plan Stage 1 procedures: plantar fascia release and 1st metatarsal dorsiflexion osteotomy. This should correct the deformity without needing calcaneal osteotomy. On the left side, since the hindfoot stays varus on the Coleman block test, this indicates a fixed hindfoot deformity. I would plan a staged approach: Stage 1 would be plantar fascia release and 1st MT osteotomy, then reassess. If the hindfoot varus persists after Stage 1, Stage 2 would include a calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy. I would also consider peroneus longus to brevis transfer if peroneus brevis is weak. Fourth, I would counsel the patient and family that CMT is progressive, so recurrence is possible, and ongoing neurological management is essential. I would stage the procedures - do one foot at a time or both Stage 1 procedures, then reassess before Stage 2.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Coleman block test determines surgical approach
Flexible hindfoot = forefoot procedures may suffice
Fixed hindfoot = needs calcaneal osteotomy
Staged approach reduces complications
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not using Coleman block test to guide surgery
✗Doing same procedure on both feet despite different flexibility
✗Not addressing underlying CMT
✗Rushing to single-stage correction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if both feet had fixed hindfoot varus?"
"How would you manage recurrence?"
"What are the risks of calcaneal osteotomy in a 14-year-old?"
"When would you consider tendon transfers?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication Management (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 12-year-old boy had a calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy for cavovarus foot 6 months ago. He now presents with a valgus hindfoot and lateral ankle pain."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation suggests overcorrection from the calcaneal osteotomy. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would assess the current deformity - clinical examination for hindfoot valgus, radiographs to measure hindfoot alignment, and assess for lateral ankle impingement or peroneal tendon issues. Second, I would determine the severity - mild overcorrection may be managed with orthotics, but significant valgus may need revision surgery. Third, my management would depend on severity: If mild (5-10 degrees valgus), I would try custom orthotics with medial heel wedge and medial arch support. If moderate to severe (greater than 10 degrees valgus), I would consider revision calcaneal osteotomy to correct the alignment. This would involve either a medial closing wedge osteotomy or reversing the lateralizing osteotomy. Fourth, I would address any associated issues - lateral ankle pain may be from impingement or peroneal tendon problems, which may need debridement or repair. Fifth, I would counsel the patient and family that overcorrection is a known complication (5-10% incidence) and that revision surgery may be needed. I would also ensure the underlying cause (if neurological) is being managed to prevent further progression.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Overcorrection is a known complication (5-10%)
Mild overcorrection may be managed conservatively
Severe overcorrection needs revision surgery
Address associated symptoms (lateral ankle pain)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing overcorrection
✗Rushing to revision without trying conservative management
✗Missing associated peroneal tendon issues
✗Not addressing underlying cause
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you prevent overcorrection?"
"What is the technique for revision calcaneal osteotomy?"
"What are the risks of revision surgery?"
"How would you counsel the family?"

MCQ Practice Points

Coleman Block Test

Q: What does the Coleman block test determine in cavus foot? A: The Coleman block test determines if hindfoot varus is flexible (forefoot-driven) or fixed. Patient stands on 1-inch block under lateral foot with 1st and 2nd rays off. If hindfoot corrects to neutral = flexible, 1st MT osteotomy may suffice. If stays varus = fixed, needs calcaneal osteotomy.

Etiology

Q: What is the most common neurological cause of pediatric cavus foot? A: Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is the most common neurological cause. CMT is an inherited motor and sensory neuropathy that causes progressive muscle weakness and imbalance, leading to cavovarus foot deformity. Always consider CMT in pediatric cavus, especially if bilateral and progressive.

Surgical Approach

Q: What is the recommended surgical approach for pediatric cavus foot? A: Staged correction is preferred. Stage 1: Plantar fascia release + 1st metatarsal dorsiflexion osteotomy. Reassess after 3-6 months. Stage 2: Calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy only if hindfoot varus persists. Staged approach has better outcomes and lower complication rates than single-stage correction.

Primary Deformity

Q: What is the primary driver of cavus foot deformity? A: Plantar-flexed 1st metatarsal is the primary driver. The tripod effect: plantar-flexed 1st ray forces forefoot to pronate to get heel to ground, creating functional hindfoot varus. Correcting the 1st ray often corrects the hindfoot without calcaneal osteotomy if flexible.

Spinal Pathology

Q: When should you order spinal MRI in pediatric cavus foot? A: Order spinal MRI if: progressive deformity, neurological symptoms (weakness, numbness, bladder/bowel), spinal stigmata on exam (midline defects, hair tufts), negative family history (rules out CMT), or unilateral/asymmetric presentation. Missing tethered cord or spinal dysraphism has serious consequences.

Recurrence

Q: What is the recurrence rate after cavus foot correction? A: 10-20% recurrence rate, especially if underlying neurological cause is not addressed. CMT and other progressive conditions continue to cause muscle imbalance. Surgery corrects the deformity but does not treat the underlying condition. Ongoing neurological management is essential.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Access to Care

  • Most cases managed in pediatric orthopaedic clinics
  • Neurological workup through pediatric neurology services
  • Genetic testing for CMT available through public health system
  • Spinal MRI readily available if indicated

Medicolegal Considerations

  • Key documentation: Neurological examination, Coleman block test result, discussion of underlying causes
  • Consent: Must discuss recurrence risk, need for staged procedures, underlying condition management
  • Common issues: Missing underlying neurological cause, not performing Coleman block test, overcorrection

Key Documentation Requirements

Key documentation points:

  • Thorough neurological examination performed
  • Coleman block test result documented (flexible vs fixed)
  • Discussion of underlying causes (CMT, spinal pathology)
  • Spinal examination findings (midline defects, etc.)
  • Indication for spinal MRI if ordered
  • Discussion of recurrence risk if underlying cause not addressed

Don't Miss Spinal Pathology: Missing tethered cord or spinal dysraphism in a child with cavus foot is a serious medicolegal issue. Always document spinal examination and reasoning for or against spinal MRI.

CAVUS FOOT (PEDIATRIC)

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Pathophysiology

  • •50-60% neurological cause - CMT most common
  • •Plantar-flexed 1st ray = primary deformity driver
  • •Tripod effect: 1st MT too low → forefoot pronates → hindfoot varus
  • •Coleman block test = gold standard for flexibility

Clinical Assessment

  • •Coleman block test: Stand on 1-inch block under lateral foot - does hindfoot correct?
  • •Neurological exam: Muscle strength, reflexes, sensation, spine examination
  • •Muscle wasting: Anterior/lateral compartments (stork leg in CMT)
  • •Calcaneal pitch angle: greater than 30 degrees = cavus (normal 20 degrees)

Etiology Workup

  • •CMT: Family history, nerve conduction studies, genetic testing
  • •Spinal dysraphism: Spine exam, spinal MRI if any suspicion
  • •Tethered cord: Progressive deformity, bladder/bowel symptoms, spinal MRI
  • •Idiopathic: No underlying cause, may be familial

Surgical Algorithm

  • •Flexible hindfoot (Coleman negative): Plantar fascia release + 1st MT osteotomy
  • •Fixed hindfoot (Coleman positive): Add calcaneal lateralizing osteotomy
  • •Staged approach: Stage 1 first, reassess, Stage 2 if needed
  • •Never do everything at once - high complication rate

Complications

  • •Overcorrection to valgus: 5-10% incidence
  • •Recurrence: 10-20% if underlying cause not addressed
  • •Nonunion: 5-10% after calcaneal osteotomy
  • •Growth disturbance: Rare, avoid osteotomy through growth plate
Quick Stats
Reading Time99 min
Related Topics

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Atlantoaxial Instability

Blount Disease (Tibia Vara)

Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy