Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Congenital Constriction Bands (Amniotic Band Syndrome)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Congenital Constriction Bands (Amniotic Band Syndrome)

Comprehensive guide to congenital constriction bands - amniotic band syndrome, classification, clinical features, treatment, and differentiation from other congenital limb deformities

complete
Updated: 2025-01-19
High Yield Overview

CONGENITAL CONSTRICTION BANDS

Amniotic Band Syndrome | Limb Constriction | Variable Severity | Z-Plasty Release

1:1,200Live births
50%Multiple bands
PattersonClassification system
Z-plastyStandard release

PATTERSON CLASSIFICATION

Grade 1
PatternSimple constriction ring, no distal edema
TreatmentZ-plasty release if symptomatic
Grade 2
PatternConstriction with distal lymphedema
TreatmentUrgent Z-plasty release
Grade 3
PatternConstriction with distal fusion/acrosyndactyly
TreatmentStaged release and separation
Grade 4
PatternIntrauterine amputation
TreatmentProsthetic fitting, no surgical release needed

Critical Must-Knows

  • Amniotic band syndrome: Fibrous bands constrict developing limbs in utero, causing deformities
  • Variable severity: From simple constriction rings to complete amputation
  • Patterson classification: Grades 1-4 based on severity and distal changes
  • Z-plasty release: Standard surgical technique for constriction bands
  • Not hereditary: Sporadic condition, not genetic

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Viva question: Classify this constriction band using Patterson system
  • "
    Distinguish from other congenital limb deformities (symbrachydactyly, radial club hand)
  • "
    Z-plasty technique: Multiple Z-plasties to lengthen and break up constriction
  • "
    Complications: Recurrence, vascular compromise, need for multiple procedures

Critical Congenital Constriction Bands Exam Points

Patterson Classification

Grade 1-4 system based on severity. Grade 1 = simple ring, Grade 2 = ring with distal edema (URGENT release), Grade 3 = acrosyndactyly, Grade 4 = amputation. Classification guides urgency and surgical approach.

Distinguish from Other Conditions

Not symbrachydactyly (missing central rays), not radial club hand (radial deficiency), not Poland syndrome (pectoralis absence). Constriction bands are asymmetric, irregular, and may affect multiple limbs.

Z-Plasty Release

Multiple Z-plasties are used to lengthen the constriction and break up the ring. Usually 2-4 Z-plasties around the circumference. Release must be complete to prevent recurrence and allow normal growth.

Timing of Surgery

Grade 2 (with edema): Urgent release to prevent vascular compromise. Grade 1: Can wait until child is older (6-12 months) if no symptoms. Grade 3: Staged release and digit separation. Grade 4: No release needed, prosthetic fitting.

Quick Decision Guide for Congenital Constriction Bands

GradeClinical FeaturesDistal ChangesManagement
Grade 1Simple constriction ring, no symptomsNone - normal distal limbObserve or Z-plasty if symptomatic
Grade 2Constriction ring with distal swellingLymphedema, may have vascular compromiseURGENT Z-plasty release
Grade 3Constriction with digit fusionAcrosyndactyly, webbed digitsStaged release and separation
Grade 4Intrauterine amputationMissing distal segmentProsthetic fitting, no release
Mnemonic

GRADEPatterson Classification - GRADE

G
Grade 1
Simple ring, no distal changes
R
Ring with edema
Grade 2 - urgent release needed
A
Acrosyndactyly
Grade 3 - digits fused distally
D
Distal amputation
Grade 4 - missing segment
E
Each grade guides treatment
Classification determines urgency and approach

Memory Hook:GRADE the constriction - Grade 1 is simple, Grade 2 is urgent, Grade 3 needs separation, Grade 4 is amputation!

Mnemonic

BANDConstriction Band Features - BAND

B
Bands are asymmetric
Irregular, not following anatomical patterns
A
Amniotic origin
Fibrous bands from ruptured amnion
N
Not hereditary
Sporadic, not genetic condition
D
Distal changes vary
From normal to edema to amputation

Memory Hook:BAND syndrome - Bands are Asymmetric, Not hereditary, Distal changes vary!

Mnemonic

RELEASEZ-Plasty Release - RELEASE

R
Release completely
Must break up entire constriction ring
E
Elevate flaps
Z-plasty flaps interdigitate to lengthen
L
Length gained
Z-plasty increases circumference
E
Edema resolves
Release allows lymphatic drainage
A
Avoid recurrence
Complete release prevents re-constriction
S
Staged if needed
Multiple procedures for complex cases
E
Early for Grade 2
Urgent release if distal edema present

Memory Hook:RELEASE the constriction - Release completely, Elevate flaps, Length gained, Edema resolves!

Overview and Epidemiology

Congenital constriction bands (also called amniotic band syndrome or constriction ring syndrome) is a condition where fibrous bands from the ruptured amnion constrict developing limbs or digits in utero, causing deformities ranging from simple constriction rings to complete intrauterine amputation.

Epidemiology:

  • Incidence: approximately 1 in 1,200 live births
  • Sporadic condition (not hereditary or genetic)
  • No sex predilection
  • 50% have multiple bands affecting different limbs
  • Most common on fingers, toes, arms, and legs
  • Asymmetric pattern (helps distinguish from genetic conditions)

Why Constriction Bands Matter

Congenital constriction bands can cause significant functional impairment and cosmetic concerns. Early recognition and appropriate classification (Patterson system) guides treatment urgency. Grade 2 bands with distal edema require urgent release to prevent vascular compromise and tissue loss. Understanding the classification system is essential for surgical planning.

Etiology:

Amniotic Band Theory

  • Ruptured amnion: Amnion tears early in pregnancy
  • Fibrous bands: Amniotic bands wrap around developing limbs
  • Constriction: Bands constrict blood flow and growth
  • Variable severity: Depends on timing and tightness of constriction
  • Not genetic: Sporadic, not inherited

Risk Factors

  • Maternal factors: Trauma, infection, drug use (controversial)
  • Early amnion rupture: More severe if occurs early in pregnancy
  • Multiple gestations: Slightly increased risk
  • Most cases: No identifiable risk factor (idiopathic)

Natural History:

  • Grade 1: Usually stable, may cause cosmetic concerns or mild functional limitations
  • Grade 2: Progressive if not released - edema worsens, may lead to tissue loss
  • Grade 3: Digits remain fused, need surgical separation
  • Grade 4: No progression (already amputated), need prosthetic management

Clinical Presentation

Bilateral lower limb constriction bands showing pre-operative presentation with distal edema and post-operative outcomes
Click to expand
Clinical progression of bilateral lower limb constriction bands (Patterson Grade 2): (a) Pre-operative view showing circumferential constriction bands on both legs with marked distal edema/swelling affecting feet, (b) 3-week post-operative view with healing surgical scars, (c) 1-year follow-up demonstrating excellent cosmetic result with faint linear scars and normal limb functionCredit: Singh D et al., Indian J Orthop 2010 - CC BY

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Pathophysiology

The Constriction Mechanism:

Early Amnion Rupture

Amnion tears early in pregnancy (often first trimester):

  • Amniotic fluid leaks, amnion separates from chorion
  • Fibrous bands form from torn amnion
  • Bands float in amniotic fluid and can wrap around developing fetus
  • Constriction occurs as fetus grows

Variable Constriction

Severity depends on:

  • Timing of amnion rupture (earlier = more severe)
  • Tightness of band constriction
  • Location of constriction (digits vs limb)
  • Duration of constriction before birth
  • May cause vascular compromise, lymphatic obstruction, or complete amputation

Effects of Constriction:

Effects of Constriction Bands

Structure AffectedConsequenceClinical Finding
LymphaticsObstructionDistal lymphedema (Grade 2)
VeinsCompressionVenous congestion, swelling
ArteriesSevere compressionTissue ischemia, amputation (Grade 4)
Bone growthRestrictionDistal hypoplasia, shortening
Soft tissueFusionAcrosyndactyly (Grade 3)

Grade 2 Requires Urgent Release

Grade 2 constriction bands with distal edema indicate lymphatic obstruction and potential vascular compromise. These require urgent Z-plasty release to prevent progression to tissue loss or amputation. Do not delay surgery - the edema indicates active obstruction that may worsen.

Classification Systems

Patterson Classification (Most Commonly Used)

GradeDescriptionDistal ChangesTreatmentUrgency
Grade 1Simple constriction ringNone - normal distal limb/digitZ-plasty if symptomatic, observe if mildElective
Grade 2Constriction with distal lymphedemaSwelling, venous congestion, may have vascular compromiseURGENT Z-plasty releaseUrgent
Grade 3Constriction with distal fusionAcrosyndactyly (digits fused at tips), webbedStaged release and digit separationElective but early
Grade 4Intrauterine amputationMissing distal segment (finger, toe, limb)Prosthetic fitting, no surgical releaseN/A

Classification Guides Treatment

The Patterson classification directly determines treatment urgency and approach. Grade 1 can be observed or treated electively. Grade 2 requires urgent release. Grade 3 needs staged procedures. Grade 4 needs prosthetics, not release. Always classify before planning treatment.

Location-Based Classification

LocationFrequencyTypical GradeFunctional Impact
FingersMost common (60%)Grade 1-3 most commonVariable - depends on digit and severity
ToesCommon (30%)Grade 1-2 most commonUsually minimal functional impact
ArmsLess common (5%)Grade 2-4 more commonSignificant if severe
LegsLess common (5%)Grade 2-4 more commonSignificant if severe, may affect gait

Clinical Assessment

History:

Key Questions

  • Prenatal history: Maternal trauma, infection, drug use?
  • Birth history: Normal delivery? Any complications?
  • Family history: Other congenital anomalies? (Usually negative - not genetic)
  • Progression: Is constriction getting worse? (Grade 2 may progress)
  • Symptoms: Pain, swelling, functional limitations?
  • Multiple sites: Check all limbs and digits

Red Flags

  • Distal swelling: Indicates Grade 2, needs urgent assessment
  • Color changes: Blue/purple distal to band suggests vascular compromise
  • Progressive constriction: May indicate active band tightening
  • Multiple severe bands: May be part of more complex syndrome

Physical Examination:

Systematic Examination

Step 1Inspection
  • Constriction rings: Visible grooves or indentations around limb/digit
  • Distal changes: Swelling (Grade 2), fusion (Grade 3), amputation (Grade 4)
  • Color: Normal, pale, or blue/purple (vascular compromise)
  • Multiple sites: Check all limbs, fingers, toes
  • Asymmetric pattern: Helps distinguish from genetic conditions
Step 2Palpation
  • Band depth: Superficial or deep constriction
  • Distal pulses: May be diminished in Grade 2
  • Edema: Pitting edema distal to band (Grade 2)
  • Temperature: Cool distal to band suggests vascular compromise
  • Sensation: May be normal or decreased
Step 3Range of Motion
  • Distal joints: May have limited motion if constriction is tight
  • Digit function: Assess grip, pinch if fingers affected
  • Limb function: Assess overall function if arm/leg affected
Step 4Vascular Assessment
  • Capillary refill: Should be less than 2 seconds
  • Pulses: Distal pulses may be diminished
  • Doppler: If available, assess arterial flow
  • Urgency: If vascular compromise suspected, urgent release needed

Grade 2 Requires Urgent Assessment

Grade 2 constriction bands with distal edema indicate active lymphatic obstruction and potential vascular compromise. These require urgent surgical consultation and Z-plasty release. Delaying treatment may lead to tissue loss or progression to amputation. Do not wait for scheduled clinic - arrange urgent assessment.

Investigations

Imaging:

Radiographs

  • AP and lateral views: Assess bone structure, any underlying anomalies
  • Distal hypoplasia: May see shortened or underdeveloped bones
  • Fusion: In Grade 3, may see bony fusion of digits
  • Not diagnostic: Clinical diagnosis, X-rays confirm extent

Ultrasound/Doppler

  • Vascular assessment: If Grade 2 with edema, assess arterial flow
  • Lymphatic obstruction: May see dilated lymphatics
  • Not routine: Usually clinical diagnosis sufficient

Other Investigations:

TestIndicationFindingsClinical Use
Clinical examinationAll casesConstriction ring, distal changesPrimary diagnostic method
RadiographsAll casesBone structure, hypoplasia, fusionConfirm extent, plan surgery
Doppler ultrasoundGrade 2 with edemaArterial flow assessmentAssess vascular compromise
Genetic testingIf multiple anomaliesUsually normal (not genetic)Rule out syndromes

Clinical Diagnosis

Congenital constriction bands are a clinical diagnosis. The presence of a constriction ring with or without distal changes is diagnostic. Imaging confirms the extent but is not required for diagnosis. The Patterson classification is based on clinical findings, not imaging.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
congenital constriction bands management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for congenital constriction bandsCredit: OrthoVellum

Management by Patterson Grade

Treatment Protocol by Grade

ElectiveGrade 1

Simple constriction ring, no distal changes:

  • Observation: If mild and asymptomatic, may observe
  • Z-plasty release: If constriction is deep, causing symptoms, or cosmetic concern
  • Timing: Can wait until child is 6-12 months old (easier anesthesia)
  • Technique: 2-4 Z-plasties around circumference to lengthen and break up ring
URGENTGrade 2

Constriction with distal lymphedema:

  • URGENT Z-plasty release: Do not delay - edema indicates active obstruction
  • Timing: Within days to weeks, depending on severity
  • Technique: Complete release with multiple Z-plasties
  • Post-op: Monitor for resolution of edema, may need compression
StagedGrade 3

Constriction with acrosyndactyly:

  • Stage 1: Z-plasty release of constriction bands
  • Stage 2: Digit separation (usually 3-6 months later)
  • Technique: Release bands first, then separate fused digits
  • Multiple procedures: May need several stages for complex cases
ProstheticGrade 4

Intrauterine amputation:

  • No surgical release: Nothing to release - already amputated
  • Prosthetic fitting: When child is ready (usually 12-18 months)
  • Early fitting: Important for development and acceptance
  • Psychological support: Family counseling about prosthetic options

Grade 2 is Urgent

Grade 2 constriction bands with distal edema require urgent surgical release. The edema indicates lymphatic obstruction that may progress to vascular compromise and tissue loss. Do not delay treatment - arrange urgent surgical consultation and release within days to weeks depending on severity.

Non-Surgical Options

For Grade 1 (mild cases only):

  • Observation: Many mild Grade 1 bands cause no functional problems
  • Massage and stretching: May help with mild constrictions (limited evidence)
  • Splinting: Not typically helpful for constriction bands
  • Serial casting: Not indicated for constriction bands

Indications for Surgery:

  • Deep constriction causing functional limitations
  • Cosmetic concerns
  • Progressive constriction
  • Grade 2 or higher (surgical management required)

Most cases will require surgical release for optimal outcomes.

Surgical Technique

Surgical release of congenital constriction band showing pre-operative marking, intraoperative release, and excised specimen
Click to expand
Surgical release of congenital constriction band in infant lower limb: (a) Pre-operative view showing marked circumferential band with significant distal swelling (Patterson Grade 2), (b-c) Intraoperative views after band release with circumferential wound, (d) Excised fibrous constriction band specimen demonstrating the ring-shaped tissueCredit: Singh D et al., Indian J Orthop 2010 - CC BY

Z-Plasty Technique (Standard for Constriction Bands)

Principle: Multiple Z-plasties around the circumference lengthen the constriction and break up the ring, preventing recurrence.

Z-Plasty Release Steps

Pre-operativePlanning

Mark constriction ring: Identify the full extent of constriction Plan Z-plasties: Usually 2-4 Z-plasties around circumference Z-plasty design: 60-degree angles optimal for length gain (75% increase) Flap size: Adequate to ensure vascularity (usually 5-10mm limbs)

Step 1Incision and Flap Elevation

Incision: Make Z-plasty incisions through constriction ring Elevate flaps: Raise skin and subcutaneous tissue as flaps Preserve vascularity: Maintain adequate blood supply to flaps Release deep tissues: May need to release fascia if constriction is deep

Step 2Transposition

Transpose flaps: Rotate flaps to interdigitate (Z-plasty pattern) Lengthen circumference: Z-plasty increases length by 75% (60-degree angles) Break up ring: Multiple Z-plasties prevent recurrence Ensure complete release: No residual constriction

Step 3Closure

Suture flaps: Close Z-plasty incisions Drains: Usually not needed Dressing: Non-constrictive, allow for swelling Splint: May use splint to protect repair

Z-Plasty Principles

Z-plasty lengthens tissue by interdigitating triangular flaps. 60-degree angles provide 75% length gain. Multiple Z-plasties around the circumference ensure complete release and prevent recurrence. The technique breaks up the constriction ring while maintaining vascularity of the flaps.

Digit Separation for Acrosyndactyly

For Grade 3 constriction bands with fused digits:

Staged Digit Separation

First ProcedureStage 1: Band Release

Release constriction bands: Z-plasty release of all constriction rings Allow healing: 3-6 months between stages Assess: Evaluate digit viability and separation feasibility

Second ProcedureStage 2: Digit Separation

Plan separation: Identify web spaces and digit boundaries Create web spaces: Use local flaps or skin grafts Separate digits: Release all soft tissue connections Preserve neurovascular bundles: Critical for digit survival

If NeededAdditional Stages

Complex cases: May need multiple separation procedures Skin grafts: May be needed if local tissue insufficient Tendon reconstruction: If tendons are abnormal or fused Joint reconstruction: If joints are fused or malformed

Staged approach allows assessment after each procedure and reduces complications.

Surgical Complications

ComplicationIncidenceCauseManagement
Recurrence5-10%Incomplete release, inadequate Z-plastiesRevision Z-plasty
Flap necrosisRarePoor vascularity, tight closureDebridement, local flaps
Wound infection5%Contamination, poor healingAntibiotics, debridement
Scar contracture10-15%Healing issues, inadequate releaseRevision, scar management
Vascular compromiseRareInjury to vessels during releaseUrgent exploration, vascular repair

Complete Release is Essential

Incomplete release leads to recurrence. The constriction ring must be completely broken up with multiple Z-plasties. Inadequate release allows the constriction to reform as the child grows. Always ensure complete release at the time of surgery.

Complications

Complications of Constriction Bands

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Recurrence after release5-10%Incomplete release, inadequate Z-plastiesRevision Z-plasty
Distal hypoplasiaCommon in Grade 3-4Early constriction, growth restrictionAccept or lengthening procedures
Vascular compromiseRare but seriousTight constriction, delayed releaseUrgent release, may need amputation
Functional limitationsVariableSeverity, location, multiple bandsTherapy, adaptive devices
Cosmetic concernsCommonVisible constriction rings, amputationsReassurance, revision surgery if severe

Prevent Progression

Grade 2 bands can progress to Grade 4 if not treated. Distal edema indicates active obstruction that may worsen. Urgent release prevents progression to tissue loss or amputation. Do not delay treatment for Grade 2 constriction bands.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Postoperative Protocol

Protection PhaseWeek 0-2
  • Dressing: Non-constrictive, allow for swelling
  • Elevation: If limb affected, elevate to reduce edema
  • Wound care: Monitor for infection, keep clean and dry
  • Splint: May use splint to protect repair
Early HealingWeek 2-6
  • Suture removal: 10-14 days post-operatively
  • Scar management: Begin scar massage when healed
  • ROM exercises: Gentle range of motion if joints affected
  • Monitor: Check for recurrence, wound healing
RehabilitationMonth 2-6
  • Scar management: Continue massage, silicone sheets if needed
  • Functional therapy: If digits/limbs affected, occupational/physical therapy
  • Monitor growth: Ensure normal growth distal to release
  • Follow-up: Clinical assessment for recurrence
OngoingLong-term
  • Annual follow-up: Monitor for recurrence, growth
  • Functional assessment: Ensure normal development
  • Cosmetic concerns: Address if significant
  • Additional procedures: If needed for Grade 3 separation or recurrence

Rehabilitation:

  • Scar management: Essential to prevent contracture
  • Functional therapy: If digits or limbs affected
  • Adaptive devices: May be needed for severe cases
  • Psychological support: Important for children and families

Outcomes

Long-Term Outcomes:

  • Good to excellent results in 90-95% with appropriate Z-plasty release
  • Recurrence rate 5-10% (usually from incomplete release)
  • Functional outcomes depend on severity and location
  • Grade 1: Excellent outcomes with release
  • Grade 2: Good outcomes if released urgently
  • Grade 3: Variable outcomes, may need multiple procedures
  • Grade 4: Prosthetic outcomes generally good with early fitting

Predictors of Outcome:

  • Severity: Grade 1-2 have better outcomes than Grade 3-4
  • Timing of release: Earlier release (especially Grade 2) has better outcomes
  • Complete release: Incomplete release leads to recurrence
  • Location: Fingers and toes generally have better outcomes than limbs

Early Release is Key

Early release of Grade 2 constriction bands prevents progression and improves outcomes. Delaying release allows edema to worsen and may lead to tissue loss. Grade 1 bands can be released electively, but Grade 2 requires urgent attention.

Evidence Base

Patterson Classification and Outcomes

4
Patterson TJS • Plast Reconstr Surg (1961)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of constriction band classification
  • Grade 1-4 system based on severity and distal changes
  • Classification guides treatment urgency and approach
  • Z-plasty release is standard treatment
Clinical Implication: Patterson classification remains the standard for constriction bands. It directly guides treatment decisions and urgency.
Limitation: Historical case series, before modern surgical techniques.

Z-Plasty Release Outcomes

4
Upton J, Tan C • J Hand Surg Am (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 95 constriction band releases
  • Z-plasty release successful in 90% of cases
  • Recurrence rate 8% (incomplete release)
  • Multiple Z-plasties prevent recurrence better than single
Clinical Implication: Z-plasty release is effective for constriction bands. Multiple Z-plasties around the circumference are preferred to prevent recurrence.
Limitation: Retrospective study, single center.

Grade 2 Constriction Bands - Urgent Release

4
Keswani SG et al • Plast Reconstr Surg (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Review of Grade 2 constriction bands
  • Urgent release prevents progression to tissue loss
  • Delayed release associated with worse outcomes
  • Early release allows resolution of edema
Clinical Implication: Grade 2 constriction bands with distal edema require urgent Z-plasty release. Delaying treatment may lead to tissue loss.
Limitation: Case series, limited sample size.

Staged Digit Separation for Acrosyndactyly

5
Kawamura K, Chung KC • Hand Clin (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Review of acrosyndactyly management
  • Staged approach preferred over single-stage
  • Multiple procedures often needed for complex cases
  • Outcomes variable depending on severity
Clinical Implication: Grade 3 constriction bands with acrosyndactyly require staged release and separation. Multiple procedures are often needed.
Limitation: Narrative review, not systematic.

Prosthetic Management of Amputations

5
Herring JA, Birch JG • Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Early prosthetic fitting improves acceptance
  • 12-18 months optimal age for first prosthesis
  • Psychological support important for families
  • Modern prosthetics allow good function
Clinical Implication: Grade 4 constriction bands (amputations) benefit from early prosthetic fitting. Psychological support is essential.
Limitation: Textbook chapter, not original research.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classification and Initial Management (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A newborn is noted to have a constriction ring around the middle finger with swelling of the fingertip. The constriction is deep and the distal finger is edematous."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Grade 2 constriction band according to the Patterson classification. The constriction ring with distal lymphedema indicates lymphatic obstruction, which requires urgent Z-plasty release. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would assess the severity - the deep constriction with distal edema indicates active obstruction. I would check for vascular compromise (color, temperature, capillary refill, pulses if possible). Second, I would classify this as Grade 2 (constriction with distal lymphedema) using the Patterson system. Third, I would arrange urgent surgical consultation for Z-plasty release. This cannot wait - the edema indicates active obstruction that may progress to tissue loss. Fourth, I would counsel the parents that this requires urgent surgery to prevent progression, and that Z-plasty release involves making multiple Z-shaped incisions around the constriction to lengthen and break up the ring. The surgery should be done within days to weeks depending on the severity of the edema.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Grade 2 constriction band - constriction with distal edema
Urgent Z-plasty release required
Edema indicates active lymphatic obstruction
Delay may lead to tissue loss
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing urgency of Grade 2
✗Confusing with other congenital conditions
✗Delaying surgery unnecessarily
✗Not performing complete release
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the finger becomes blue or purple?"
"How would you perform the Z-plasty?"
"What are the risks of delaying surgery?"
"How do you prevent recurrence?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Technique (~3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"Walk me through the Z-plasty release technique for a constriction band."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would perform a Z-plasty release for the constriction band. My approach: First, I would mark the constriction ring and plan 2-4 Z-plasties around the circumference. I would design 60-degree angle Z-plasties as these provide optimal length gain (75% increase). The Z-plasty limbs should be 5-10mm to ensure adequate vascularity. Second, I would make the Z-plasty incisions through the constriction ring, elevating skin and subcutaneous tissue as triangular flaps. I would preserve the vascularity of the flaps. If the constriction is deep, I may need to release fascia as well. Third, I would transpose the flaps to interdigitate in the Z-plasty pattern. This lengthens the circumference and breaks up the constriction ring. I would ensure complete release - no residual constriction should remain. Fourth, I would close the Z-plasty incisions with sutures. I would use a non-constrictive dressing and may use a splint to protect the repair. Post-operatively, I would monitor for wound healing, resolution of edema (if Grade 2), and check for recurrence. The key principles are: multiple Z-plasties for complete release, adequate flap size for vascularity, and ensuring no residual constriction.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Multiple Z-plasties around circumference
60-degree angles for optimal length gain
Complete release essential to prevent recurrence
Preserve flap vascularity
COMMON TRAPS
✗Incomplete release leading to recurrence
✗Inadequate number of Z-plasties
✗Poor flap design compromising vascularity
✗Not releasing deep tissues if constriction is deep
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the constriction is very deep?"
"How many Z-plasties are needed?"
"What are the risks of the procedure?"
"How do you prevent recurrence?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complex Case Management (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 6-month-old has multiple constriction bands affecting several fingers. Some fingers are fused at the tips (acrosyndactyly), and one finger has a constriction ring with distal swelling."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a complex case with multiple constriction bands of different severities. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would classify each constriction using the Patterson system. The finger with distal swelling is Grade 2 and requires urgent release. The fingers with acrosyndactyly are Grade 3 and will need staged release and separation. Second, I would prioritize the Grade 2 finger for urgent Z-plasty release to prevent progression. This should be done within days to weeks. Third, for the Grade 3 fingers with acrosyndactyly, I would plan a staged approach: Stage 1 would be Z-plasty release of all constriction bands, allowing 3-6 months for healing. Stage 2 would be digit separation, creating web spaces and separating the fused digits while preserving neurovascular bundles. This may require multiple procedures depending on complexity. Fourth, I would counsel the family that this will require multiple surgeries over months to years, and that outcomes depend on the severity and complexity of the deformities. I would also ensure they understand the urgency of the Grade 2 finger and the staged nature of the Grade 3 management.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Different grades require different approaches
Grade 2 is urgent, Grade 3 is staged
Multiple procedures often needed
Family counseling about staged approach
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not prioritizing Grade 2 appropriately
✗Trying to do everything at once
✗Not explaining staged approach to family
✗Missing other constriction bands
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you sequence the surgeries?"
"What if a finger has both Grade 2 and Grade 3 features?"
"How do you manage the family's expectations?"
"What are the long-term outcomes?"

MCQ Practice Points

Patterson Classification

Q: A newborn has a constriction ring around a finger with swelling of the fingertip. What is the Patterson grade and management? A: Grade 2 - constriction with distal lymphedema. This requires URGENT Z-plasty release to prevent progression to tissue loss. The edema indicates active lymphatic obstruction that may worsen if not treated promptly.

Z-Plasty Technique

Q: How many Z-plasties are typically needed for constriction band release? A: Usually 2-4 Z-plasties around the circumference. Multiple Z-plasties ensure complete release and prevent recurrence. The Z-plasties should have 60-degree angles for optimal length gain (75% increase).

Distinguishing Features

Q: How do you distinguish constriction bands from symbrachydactyly? A: Constriction bands are asymmetric, irregular, and may affect multiple limbs. Symbrachydactyly is central ray deficiency (missing middle fingers), usually bilateral and more symmetric. Constriction bands have visible constriction rings, while symbrachydactyly has absent rays.

Urgency of Treatment

Q: Which Patterson grade requires urgent surgical release? A: Grade 2 (constriction with distal lymphedema) requires urgent release. The edema indicates active lymphatic obstruction that may progress to vascular compromise and tissue loss. Grade 1 can be observed or treated electively, Grade 3 is staged, Grade 4 needs prosthetics.

Recurrence Prevention

Q: How do you prevent recurrence after Z-plasty release? A: Complete release with multiple Z-plasties around the entire circumference. Incomplete release allows the constriction to reform as the child grows. Using 2-4 Z-plasties with 60-degree angles ensures adequate lengthening and breaks up the constriction ring completely.

Grade 3 Management

Q: How do you manage Grade 3 constriction bands with acrosyndactyly? A: Staged approach: Stage 1 is Z-plasty release of constriction bands, allowing 3-6 months for healing. Stage 2 is digit separation, creating web spaces and separating fused digits while preserving neurovascular bundles. Multiple procedures may be needed for complex cases.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Access to Care

  • Most cases managed in pediatric orthopaedic or plastic surgery clinics
  • Urgent cases (Grade 2) can access emergency surgical services
  • Prosthetic services available through public health system
  • Multidisciplinary team approach (orthopaedics, plastics, prosthetics)

Medicolegal Considerations

  • Key documentation: Patterson classification, urgency assessment, timing of surgery
  • Consent: Must discuss staged approach if Grade 3, recurrence risk, need for multiple procedures
  • Common issues: Delayed recognition of Grade 2 urgency, incomplete release leading to recurrence

Key Documentation Requirements

Key documentation points:

  • Patterson classification (Grade 1-4) clearly documented
  • Assessment of urgency (especially Grade 2)
  • Discussion of treatment plan and staging if Grade 3
  • Family counseling about prognosis and need for multiple procedures
  • Timing of surgery (urgent vs elective)

Don't Delay Grade 2: Missing the urgency of Grade 2 constriction bands with distal edema is a serious issue. These require urgent release, and delay may lead to tissue loss or amputation.

CONGENITAL CONSTRICTION BANDS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Patterson Classification

  • •Grade 1: Simple ring, no distal changes = elective release
  • •Grade 2: Ring with distal edema = URGENT release
  • •Grade 3: Ring with acrosyndactyly = staged release and separation
  • •Grade 4: Intrauterine amputation = prosthetic fitting

Key Clinical Features

  • •Asymmetric, irregular constriction rings
  • •Not hereditary - sporadic condition
  • •50% have multiple bands
  • •Variable severity from simple ring to amputation

Surgical Technique

  • •Z-plasty release: 2-4 Z-plasties around circumference
  • •60-degree angles for optimal length gain (75%)
  • •Complete release essential to prevent recurrence
  • •Preserve flap vascularity

Treatment Urgency

  • •Grade 1: Elective (6-12 months)
  • •Grade 2: URGENT (days to weeks)
  • •Grade 3: Staged (release then separation)
  • •Grade 4: Prosthetic fitting (12-18 months)

Complications

  • •Recurrence: 5-10% if incomplete release
  • •Flap necrosis: Rare but serious
  • •Wound infection: 5%
  • •Scar contracture: 10-15%
Quick Stats
Reading Time94 min
Related Topics

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Atlantoaxial Instability

Blount Disease (Tibia Vara)

Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy