Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Diabetic Foot Management

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Diabetic Foot Management

Comprehensive guide to diabetic foot ulcer classification (Wagner, Texas), infection management, amputation indications, and multidisciplinary care

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

DIABETIC FOOT MANAGEMENT

Wagner Classification | Texas Classification | Infection Control | Amputation Levels

15%Diabetics develop foot ulcers
85%Amputations preventable with care
20-foldIncreased amputation risk
50%5-year mortality post amputation

Wagner Classification (Depth)

Grade 0
PatternIntact skin, high risk
TreatmentPrevention, orthotics
Grade 1
PatternSuperficial ulcer
TreatmentOffloading, wound care
Grade 2
PatternDeep ulcer to tendon/bone
TreatmentDebridement, antibiotics
Grade 3
PatternOsteomyelitis or abscess
TreatmentSurgical debridement
Grade 4
PatternForefoot gangrene
TreatmentPartial amputation
Grade 5
PatternWhole foot gangrene
TreatmentMajor amputation

Critical Must-Knows

  • Wagner classification = depth (0-5); Texas = depth + ischemia + infection
  • Probe-to-bone test: positive likelihood ratio 6.4 for osteomyelitis
  • IDSA guidelines: antibiotics for infection, NOT colonization
  • Transtibial amputation has better healing (80-90%) than transmetatarsal (50-70%)
  • Multidisciplinary team approach reduces amputation rate by 50%

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Texas classification adds ischemia/infection to Wagner depth grading
  • "
    PEDIS system: Perfusion, Extent, Depth, Infection, Sensation
  • "
    Offloading is THE critical treatment - total contact casting is gold standard
  • "
    Major amputation mortality at 1 year: 30%; at 5 years: 50%

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Clinical appearances of diabetic foot deformities
Click to expand
Clinical appearances of diabetic foot deformities: (Top left) Claw toe deformity with hammering of the lesser toes creating pressure points for ulceration. (Top right) Plantar ulcer with necrotic tissue on the great toe - common in neuropathic feet. (Bottom) Classic Charcot foot with rocker-bottom deformity and plantar midfoot ulceration from bony prominence. These deformities result from combined motor and sensory neuropathy.Credit: PMC5154308 - CC-BY
Charcot foot deformity with midfoot collapse and ulceration
Click to expand
Advanced Charcot neuroarthropathy showing classic rocker-bottom foot deformity with midfoot collapse. Note the medial prominence at the talonavicular/naviculocuneiform level with overlying ulceration from abnormal pressure distribution. The forefoot appears adducted relative to the hindfoot. This end-stage deformity typically requires surgical reconstruction or amputation.Credit: Medicalpal via Wikimedia Commons - CC-BY-SA 4.0
PET-CT imaging of diabetic Charcot foot
Click to expand
PET-CT imaging in diabetic Charcot foot: (a) Axial CT showing bilateral feet with destructive changes in the left midfoot consistent with Charcot neuroarthropathy. (b) PET showing increased FDG uptake in the left midfoot. (c) Fused PET-CT localizing the metabolic activity to the Charcot joint. PET-CT helps differentiate active Charcot from osteomyelitis when combined with clinical assessment.Credit: Shagos GS et al., Indian J Nucl Med (PMC4379691) - CC-BY

Critical Diabetic Foot Exam Points

Classification Systems

Know both Wagner AND Texas. Wagner = depth only (0-5). Texas = 4x4 grid (depth A-D, plus ischemia/infection grades 0-3). Examiners expect you to classify using BOTH systems and explain which guides treatment.

Infection vs Colonization

Antibiotics for infection, NOT colonization. IDSA criteria: purulence OR 2+ signs (warmth, erythema, lymphangitis, edema, pain). Swab cultures meaningless - tissue culture after debridement only.

Amputation Levels

Healing rates determine level. Toe: 90%, Ray: 80-90%, Transmetatarsal: 50-70%, Syme: 70-80%, Transtibial: 80-90%. Higher = better healing but worse function. Aim for most distal level with viable tissue.

Offloading

Offloading is treatment, not adjunct. Total contact casting reduces plantar pressure by 80-90%. Non-removable walker next best. Removable devices fail due to non-compliance. No offloading = no healing.

Quick Decision Guide: Wagner Classification

GradeClinical FeaturesTreatmentKey Pearl
Grade 0Intact skin, callus, deformityPrevention: orthotics, patient educationHigh-risk foot - prevent ulcer formation
Grade 1Superficial ulcer, no deeper structuresOffloading, sharp debridement, moist dressing90% heal with proper offloading alone
Grade 2Deep ulcer to tendon, bone, jointSurgical debridement, antibiotics if infectedProbe-to-bone test - feel hard gritty bone
Grade 3Deep ulcer with abscess or osteomyelitisUrgent surgical debridement, IV antibioticsMRI if osteomyelitis uncertain - 90% sensitivity
Grade 4Forefoot gangrene (toes, metatarsals)Partial foot amputation (toe, ray, transmetatarsal)Revascularization first if ischemic
Grade 5Whole foot gangreneMajor amputation (Syme, transtibial, transfemoral)50% 5-year mortality - palliative care discussion

Mnemonics and Memory Aids

Mnemonic

WSTDAGWagner Classification (0-5 Depth)

W
Well (Grade 0)
Intact skin, high risk foot
S
Superficial (Grade 1)
Ulcer without deeper structures
T
Tendon (Grade 2)
Deep to tendon, capsule, or bone
D
Deep infection (Grade 3)
Abscess or osteomyelitis
A
Anterior foot gangrene (Grade 4)
Forefoot necrosis
G
Global foot gangrene (Grade 5)
Whole foot necrosis

Memory Hook:Wagner Starts Treating Deep Abscesses Globally - each grade adds a layer of complexity!

Mnemonic

WELPIDSA Infection Criteria

W
Warmth
Local temperature elevation
E
Erythema
Redness extending beyond ulcer
L
Lymphangitis
Red streaking proximally
P
Purulence
Pus discharge from wound

Memory Hook:When you need hELP, look for infection signs - purulence OR 2+ of WELP!

Mnemonic

TRSTAmputation Level Selection

T
Toe (90%)
Single or multiple toe amputation
R
Ray (80-90%)
Toe plus metatarsal resection
S
Syme (70-80%)
Ankle disarticulation
T
Transtibial (80-90%)
Below-knee amputation

Memory Hook:TRuST the healing rates - higher level = better healing but worse function!

Mnemonic

PEDISPEDIS Classification System

P
Perfusion
Arterial supply assessment
E
Extent
Ulcer size and location
D
Depth
Tissue layers involved
I
Infection
Signs of infection present
S
Sensation
Neuropathy severity

Memory Hook:PEDIS walks you through systematic foot ulcer assessment - used in research!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why Diabetic Foot Matters

Diabetic foot disease is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputation worldwide. In Australia, diabetes accounts for over 4,400 lower limb amputations annually. The combination of neuropathy (leading to trauma without pain awareness) and peripheral arterial disease (preventing healing) creates a perfect storm. Multidisciplinary care reduces amputation rates by 50% - making this a public health priority.

Pathophysiology Triad

Neuropathy: Loss of protective sensation - patients don't feel injuries. Motor neuropathy causes intrinsic muscle atrophy, leading to claw toes and pressure points.

Ischemia: Peripheral arterial disease affects tibial vessels preferentially. Calcified vessels reduce perfusion.

Infection: Polymicrobial, often involving anaerobes. Biofilm formation prevents healing.

Together, these create chronic non-healing ulcers.

Australian Burden

AIHW Data (2023):

  • 4,400+ lower limb amputations per year
  • 85% occur in people with diabetes
  • Indigenous Australians: 4-8 times higher amputation rate
  • Direct cost: over $1.6 billion annually
  • Indirect cost: loss of independence, mobility

Key message: Prevention and early intervention are cost-effective.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Neuropathic Changes

Sensory neuropathy: Loss of protective sensation (LOPS) - patients don't feel injuries. 10g monofilament test diagnostic.

Motor neuropathy: Intrinsic muscle atrophy leads to imbalanced forces - claw toes, prominent metatarsal heads, high plantar pressure.

Autonomic neuropathy: Dry skin (anhidrosis) leads to cracks and fissures - entry points for infection.

Charcot neuroarthropathy: Repetitive microtrauma without pain leads to bone/joint destruction.

Neuropathy removes pain as a warning signal - injuries go unnoticed.

Vascular Changes

Peripheral arterial disease: Preferential involvement of tibial vessels (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, peroneal). Spares profunda femoris.

Medial calcification (Monckeberg sclerosis): Calcium deposits in arterial media - non-obstructive but reduces vessel compliance. Makes ABI falsely elevated.

Microvascular disease: Thickened capillary basement membrane reduces oxygen diffusion.

Impaired angiogenesis: Diabetic wounds have reduced VEGF response, poor collateral formation.

Ischemia prevents healing even when infection controlled.

Biomechanics of Plantar Ulceration

Normal plantar pressure: 200-300 kPa. In diabetic foot with neuropathy and motor imbalance, pressure at metatarsal heads increases to 700-1000 kPa (7-10 times higher). Callus forms as protective response but increases local pressure further (callus is THICK and non-compressible). Repetitive high pressure + loss of sensation = ulcer formation at pressure points. This is WHY offloading (TCC) is critical - reduces pressure by 80-90% to below ulceration threshold.

Foot Deformities and Ulcer Risk

DeformityMechanismHigh-Risk ZonePrevention
Claw toesIntrinsic muscle atrophy, unopposed long extensors/flexorsPlantar metatarsal heads, dorsal PIP jointsAchilles lengthening, toe straightening, custom orthotics
Charcot midfoot collapseBone/joint destruction from repetitive trauma without painMedial midfoot (rocker-bottom deformity)Total contact casting during acute phase, custom AFO
Hallux valgusBunion formation, first MTP prominenceMedial first MTP, plantar first metatarsal headWide toe-box shoes, bunion pads, surgical correction if severe
Pes cavus (high arch)Fixed deformity, concentrated pressure pointsPlantar heel, metatarsal heads, lateral borderCustom molded orthotics redistributing pressure

Classification Systems

Wagner Classification (Depth-Based)

The original and most widely used system. Simple, reproducible, focuses on ulcer depth and tissue involvement.

GradeDefinitionClinical FeaturesTreatment Approach
Grade 0Intact skin at riskCallus, deformity, Charcot foot, prior ulcerPrevention: custom orthotics, patient education, regular foot checks
Grade 1Superficial ulcerPartial or full thickness skin loss, no deeper structures visibleOffloading (total contact cast), sharp debridement, moist dressing
Grade 2Deep ulcer to bone/tendonUlcer extends to ligament, tendon, joint capsule, or boneSurgical debridement, probe-to-bone test, consider antibiotics
Grade 3Deep with abscess/osteomyelitisDeep-tissue abscess, osteomyelitis, or septic arthritisUrgent surgical debridement, IV antibiotics, prolonged therapy
Grade 4Localized gangreneNecrosis of forefoot (toes, metatarsals), demarcatedPartial foot amputation (toe, ray, transmetatarsal)
Grade 5Extensive gangreneNecrosis involving entire foot, not salvageableMajor amputation (transtibial, transfemoral)

Wagner Limitations

Wagner classification does NOT account for ischemia or infection severity. A Wagner Grade 2 ulcer can be clean without infection, or it can have severe necrotizing fasciitis. Similarly, perfusion status (critical limb ischemia vs adequate flow) dramatically affects healing. This led to development of Texas and PEDIS classifications.

Wagner classification guides treatment urgency and predicts amputation risk.

University of Texas (UT) Classification

Adds infection and ischemia to Wagner's depth grading. Creates a 4x4 matrix with 16 possible grades.

Depth Grades (Vertical Axis):

  • Grade A: Superficial wound not involving tendon, capsule, or bone
  • Grade B: Wound penetrating to tendon or capsule
  • Grade C: Wound penetrating to bone or joint
  • Grade D: Infected wound (any depth)

Modifiers (Horizontal Axis):

  • Stage 0: No infection, no ischemia
  • Stage 1: Infection present
  • Stage 2: Ischemia present
  • Stage 3: Both infection AND ischemia

Texas Classification Examples

GradeClinical ScenarioWagner EquivalentKey Difference
A0Clean superficial ulcer, good perfusionWagner 1Texas specifies NO infection, NO ischemia
B1Deep ulcer to tendon, infectedWagner 2Texas adds infection status
C2Bone exposure, ischemic limbWagner 2Texas adds critical ischemia - needs revascularization
D3Infected wound with ischemia (any depth)Variable WagnerTexas D3 is highest risk - requires urgent intervention

Texas D3 = Limb-Threatening Emergency

Any infected diabetic foot with ischemia (Texas D3) is a surgical emergency. Without urgent revascularization AND infection control, amputation is inevitable. Admit, IV antibiotics, vascular surgery consult within 24 hours. These patients have 50% amputation risk at 1 year.

Texas classification better predicts outcomes and guides treatment intensity.

PEDIS Classification (IWGDF)

International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) system. Used primarily in research. Grades each domain separately.

Components:

Perfusion

Grade 1: No symptoms/signs of PAD

Grade 2: PAD without critical ischemia

Grade 3: Critical limb ischemia

Assessed by: ABI, TBI, toe pressure, TcPO2.

Extent

Measurement: Length × width in cm²

Categories: Small (less than 1 cm²), Medium (1-3 cm²), Large (greater than 3 cm²)

Larger ulcers have worse prognosis.

Depth

Grade 1: Superficial (skin only)

Grade 2: Deep (to tendon, bone, joint)

Grade 3: All layers with abscess or osteomyelitis

Infection

Grade 1: No infection

Grade 2: Infection involving skin/subcutaneous

Grade 3: Systemic inflammatory response

Grade 4: Severe sepsis/life-threatening

Sensation: Assessed by monofilament testing (10g Semmes-Weinstein). Loss of protective sensation (LOPS) is binary - present or absent.

PEDIS in Clinical Practice

PEDIS is comprehensive but complex for daily use. Most clinicians use Wagner or Texas for treatment decisions, then document PEDIS components for research databases. The key value of PEDIS is standardizing research outcomes and international communication.

PEDIS provides comprehensive assessment for research and international standardization.

Clinical Assessment

History

Diabetes control: HbA1c, duration of diabetes, complications

Ulcer timeline: When first noticed, progression, prior ulcers

Symptoms: Pain (neuropathic vs ischemic), numbness, tingling

Function: Walking ability, distance before claudication

Red flags: Fever, rigors, confusion (systemic infection)

Social: Living situation, mobility, compliance capacity

Neuropathic ulcers are painless - ischemic ulcers are painful.

Examination

Inspection: Ulcer location (pressure points), size, depth, base (granulation vs slough vs necrotic), edge (undermined, callused)

Perfusion: Pulses (DP, PT), capillary refill, temperature, ABI, toe pressure

Sensation: 10g monofilament (LOPS), vibration (tuning fork), proprioception

Infection signs: Erythema extent (measure and mark), warmth, purulence, lymphangitis, crepitus

Probe-to-bone test: Sterile probe inserted - if bone felt (hard, gritty), osteomyelitis likely

Always examine the contralateral foot for risk assessment.

Probe-to-Bone Test - The 6.4 Likelihood Ratio

The probe-to-bone test has a positive likelihood ratio of 6.4 for osteomyelitis (Grayson et al, JAMA 1995). If bone is felt with a sterile probe, the probability of osteomyelitis increases substantially. However, negative test does NOT exclude osteomyelitis - MRI is gold standard if clinical suspicion remains high. The test is operator-dependent and requires adequate debridement first.

Neuropathic vs Ischemic Ulcers

FeatureNeuropathicIschemic
PainPainless (loss of protective sensation)Painful, worse with elevation, relieved by dependency
LocationPlantar pressure points (metatarsal heads, heel)Distal tips of toes, lateral malleolus, heel
Ulcer appearanceDeep, punched out, surrounded by callusShallow, irregular, pale base, no callus
SkinWarm, dry (autonomic neuropathy), good pulsesCool, hairless, atrophic, absent pulses
Healing capacityGood if offloaded and infection controlledPoor without revascularization

Investigations

Investigation Protocol

ImmediateBedside

Monofilament test: 10g Semmes-Weinstein at 9 sites. Unable to feel at 4 or more sites = LOPS.

Probe-to-bone: After debridement, sterile probe inserted. Hard gritty sensation = bone.

Capillary glucose: Assess current control, guide insulin therapy.

These simple tests guide immediate treatment decisions.

Within 24 hoursVascular Studies

Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI): 0.9-1.3 normal. Less than 0.9 suggests PAD. Greater than 1.3 suggests calcified vessels (common in diabetes - use toe pressure instead).

Toe-Brachial Index (TBI): More reliable in diabetes. TBI less than 0.6 suggests critical ischemia.

Toe Pressure: Less than 30 mmHg = critical ischemia, revascularization needed.

TcPO2 (transcutaneous oxygen): Less than 30 mmHg suggests poor healing potential.

Duplex ultrasound: If abnormal non-invasive studies, map arterial disease for revascularization planning.

Vascular assessment is ESSENTIAL - determines if healing is possible.

Within 48 hoursImaging

Plain radiographs (AP, lateral, oblique): Look for gas in soft tissues (necrotizing infection), bone destruction (osteomyelitis), Charcot changes (fragmentation, dislocation).

MRI (gold standard for osteomyelitis): Sensitivity 90%, specificity 80%. T1-weighted: dark signal in bone marrow. T2/STIR: bright signal. Gadolinium enhancement.

CT with contrast: If MRI contraindicated. Less sensitive for osteomyelitis but good for surgical planning.

Nuclear medicine (WBC scan): If MRI/CT inconclusive. Labeled WBC accumulate in infection.

MRI is gold standard but plain films are first-line screening.

Within 24 hoursLaboratory

HbA1c: Assess glycemic control over 3 months. Target less than 7% for healing.

FBC: Leukocytosis suggests systemic infection. Anemia common in chronic disease.

CRP/ESR: Elevated in infection (CRP more specific, ESR more sensitive). Trend to assess response.

Renal function (eGFR): Diabetic nephropathy common, affects antibiotic dosing.

Blood cultures: If systemic signs (fever, rigors, tachycardia, hypotension).

Tissue culture (post-debridement): Deep tissue specimen after debridement. Swab cultures unreliable.

Laboratory markers guide antibiotic choice and duration.

Osteomyelitis Diagnosis Triad

Q: What is the diagnostic triad for diabetic foot osteomyelitis?

A: (1) Probe-to-bone test positive (positive LR 6.4), (2) ESR greater than 70 mm/h (sensitivity 28%, specificity 92%), and (3) Plain radiograph showing bone destruction (late sign, 50% sensitive). MRI is gold standard (90% sensitive, 80% specific) but requires all three clinical features for high pre-test probability. Bone biopsy with culture is definitive but rarely needed.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Diabetic Foot Ulcers, detailing assessment (Wagner/Texas grade), vascular status, and treatment (Offloading, Debridement, Antibiotics).Credit: OrthoVellum

Wagner Grade 0-1 Algorithm

Grade 0: Intact skin at high risk

Prevention Protocol

InitialRisk Stratification

IWGDF Risk Categories:

  • Low: Normal sensation + pulses
  • Moderate: LOPS OR PAD
  • High: LOPS + PAD, or prior ulcer/amputation

All diabetics need annual screening.

OngoingPatient Education

Daily foot inspection (use mirror for plantar surface)

Proper footwear: Avoid barefoot walking, check inside shoes daily for foreign objects

Immediate reporting: New wounds, redness, warmth, drainage

Nail care: Straight across, podiatry referral for thick nails

Education reduces ulcer incidence by 30-50%.

Every 4-12 weeksPreventive Care

Regular podiatry: Callus debridement, nail care

Custom orthotics: Redistribute pressure (reduces recurrence 50%)

Accommodative footwear: Extra depth shoes, rocker soles

Prophylactic surgery: Consider Achilles lengthening if persistent forefoot overload

Prevention is most cost-effective intervention.

Grade 1: Superficial ulcer

Treatment Protocol

Day 0Immediate

Sharp debridement: Remove ALL callus and slough to bleeding base

Offloading: Total contact cast (gold standard) or instant TCC

Wound dressing: Moist environment (hydrocolloid, foam, hydrogel)

No antibiotics unless signs of infection

90% heal with proper offloading alone.

Weeks 1-12Weekly Review

Debridement: Repeat weekly or more if needed

Measure ulcer: Length × width, photograph for documentation

Assess healing: 50% size reduction by 4 weeks predicts healing

Monitor infection: Any new erythema, purulence, warmth

Most heal in 6-12 weeks with compliant offloading.

Re-assessmentNon-healing at 4 weeks

Re-evaluate: Check compliance with offloading, glucose control, nutrition

Rule out osteomyelitis: Probe-to-bone, plain X-ray, consider MRI

Vascular assessment: If not already done - ABI, toe pressure

Consider advanced therapy: VAC, bioengineered skin if appropriate

Non-healing suggests underlying problem - don't just continue same treatment.

Prevention and early treatment prevent progression to deeper grades.

Wagner Grade 2-3 Algorithm

Grade 2: Deep ulcer to tendon, bone, joint

Management Steps

Day 0Assessment

Probe-to-bone test: Sterile probe - if bone felt, high probability osteomyelitis

Rule out infection: Purulence or 2+ signs (warmth, erythema, edema, pain)?

Imaging: Plain X-rays (look for bone destruction, gas in tissues)

Vascular: ABI, toe pressure if not already done

Deep ulcers need comprehensive work-up.

Day 0-1Surgical Debridement

Adequate excision: Remove ALL necrotic/infected tissue to bleeding healthy tissue

Bone biopsy: If osteomyelitis suspected - send for culture and histology

Leave open: Pack with gauze, plan serial debridement if needed

Debridement is therapeutic, not just diagnostic.

If infectedAntibiotics

Uninfected: NO antibiotics (colonization is normal)

Infected: Start empiric antibiotics (see Infection Management section)

Culture-directed: De-escalate based on deep tissue culture results

Duration: 1-3 weeks for soft tissue, 6-12 weeks for osteomyelitis

Antibiotics treat infection, not colonization.

OngoingOffloading and Wound Care

TCC or iTCC: Non-removable offloading

VAC therapy: Consider for deep wounds to promote granulation

Weekly debridement: Maintain clean wound bed

Monitor healing: Measure weekly, expect 50% reduction by 4 weeks

Combination of debridement + offloading + infection control.

Grade 3: Deep ulcer with abscess or osteomyelitis

Grade 3 Requires Urgent Surgical Debridement

Deep tissue abscess or osteomyelitis is a surgical emergency. Antibiotics alone have 60-80% success rate but take 6-12 weeks. Surgical debridement has 85-90% success and shortens antibiotic duration to 2-6 weeks. For unstable patients or extensive infection, surgery is mandatory. For stable patients with limited osteomyelitis, conservative management is an option but requires prolonged compliance.

Deep ulcers often need surgery - don't delay if infection present.

Wagner Grade 4-5 Algorithm

Grade 4: Localized forefoot gangrene

Limb Salvage vs Amputation Decision

ImmediateVascular Assessment

Is tissue viable? Toe pressure, TcPO2, bleeding bone test

Critical ischemia? If toe pressure less than 30 mmHg, revascularization needed FIRST

Vascular surgery consult: Angiography, angioplasty vs bypass

Revascularization before amputation improves healing.

Within 24 hoursInfection Control

Septic patient? If systemic signs, urgent debridement for source control

IV antibiotics: Broad-spectrum empiric, then culture-directed

Serial debridement: May need multiple trips to OR

Stabilize infection before definitive amputation if possible.

Once stableAmputation Level Selection

Most distal viable level: Toe, ray, or transmetatarsal

Perfusion adequate? Toe pressure greater than 40 mmHg for TMA

Patient factors: Contralateral limb status, rehabilitation potential, goals

Shared decision: Explain healing rates and functional outcomes

Balance function preservation with healing probability.

Grade 5: Extensive foot gangrene

Major Amputation Protocol

DiscussionGoals of Care

Life expectancy: 5-year mortality 50% after major amputation

Quality of life: Ambulation potential, independence, caregiver burden

Palliative care: Some patients may choose comfort over limb salvage

Involve patient and family in decision-making early.

Surgical PlanningAmputation Level

Transtibial (BKA): If calf perfusion adequate, 80-90% healing, 60-80% ambulate

Knee disarticulation: If BKA level ischemic, easier transfers

Transfemoral (AKA): If extensive ischemia, 90-95% healing, 30-50% ambulate

Higher level = better healing but worse function.

Surgical admissionPerioperative Management

Optimize: Glucose control, nutrition, cardiac risk assessment

Antibiotics: Treat active infection, prophylaxis for surgery

DVT prophylaxis: High VTE risk - LMWH or sequential compression

Rehabilitation planning: Early physio involvement, prosthetic assessment

Multidisciplinary approach improves outcomes.

Gangrene requires amputation - focus on level selection and patient support.

Infection Management

Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Classification

SeverityClinical FeaturesMicrobiologyAntibiotic Duration
UninfectedNo purulence or inflammationColonization only (do NOT treat)No antibiotics
MildLocal infection: erythema less than 2 cm from ulcer edge, superficialGram-positive (S. aureus, Streptococcus)1-2 weeks oral antibiotics
ModerateLocal infection: erythema greater than 2 cm, OR deep tissue involvementPolymicrobial (add Gram-negative)2-3 weeks (IV initially, then oral)
SevereSystemic signs (SIRS) OR metabolic instabilityPolymicrobial + anaerobes4-6 weeks IV antibiotics, may need longer

IDSA Key Principle: Infection Requires Treatment, Colonization Does Not

Infection diagnosis requires: Purulence OR 2 or more of: warmth, erythema, lymphangitis, edema, pain. A diabetic foot ulcer with bacteria on swab but NO signs of infection is COLONIZED, not infected. Antibiotics treat infection, NOT colonization. Swab cultures are unreliable - tissue biopsy after debridement is gold standard for culture.

IDSA guidelines are the international standard for diabetic foot infection management.

Empiric Antibiotic Regimens (IDSA 2012)

Mild Infection (Oral)

First-line: Cefalexin 500 mg QID OR Amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg BD

MRSA coverage: Add TMP-SMX 160/800 mg BD OR Doxycycline 100 mg BD

Penicillin allergy: Moxifloxacin 400 mg daily (covers Gram-positive + Gram-negative)

Duration: 1-2 weeks, reassess based on clinical response

Oral antibiotics are appropriate for mild, non-limb-threatening infections.

Moderate/Severe (IV)

Empiric broad-spectrum: Piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g TDS OR Ticarcillin-clavulanate 3.1 g TDS

MRSA suspected: Add Vancomycin 15-20 mg/kg BD (trough 15-20)

Pseudomonas risk: Add Ciprofloxacin 400 mg BD OR Gentamicin (once daily dosing)

Anaerobic coverage: Metronidazole 500 mg TDS if foul smell, crepitus, or necrosis

Duration: 2-4 weeks (longer if osteomyelitis)

Severe infections require IV therapy and admission.

Australian PBS Guidelines

In Australia, eTG (Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic) recommends Flucloxacillin PLUS Metronidazole for mild-moderate diabetic foot infection (covers S. aureus and anaerobes). For severe infection, Piperacillin-tazobactam is first-line (PBS-listed). Always de-escalate based on culture results. Avoid prolonged broad-spectrum therapy unless culture-proven resistant organisms.

Tailor antibiotics to culture results and renal function.

Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Management

Diagnosis confirmed by: MRI (gold standard) OR bone biopsy with culture

Treatment options:

Osteomyelitis Management Algorithm

Option 1Conservative (Antibiotics Alone)

Indications: Small area of osteomyelitis, no abscess, no necrotic bone, patient prefers to avoid surgery

Regimen: Pathogen-directed antibiotics for 6 weeks minimum (often 12 weeks)

Monitoring: Serial CRP/ESR (expect 50% reduction by 2 weeks), clinical healing

Success rate: 60-80% if compliant, depends on organism and extent

Long-term antibiotics without surgery - requires patient compliance.

Option 2Surgical Debridement

Indications: Necrotic bone, abscess, failed conservative therapy, unstable patient requiring source control

Procedure: Resect all infected/necrotic bone until bleeding healthy bone. Send specimen for culture and histology.

Antibiotics: 2-6 weeks post-debridement (shorter than non-surgical)

Success rate: 85-90% if all infected bone removed

Definitive treatment for most cases - removes infected focus.

Option 3Amputation

Indications: Extensive osteomyelitis, non-salvageable foot, life-threatening sepsis, patient preference

Level: Most distal level with viable tissue (toe, ray, transmetatarsal, Syme, transtibial)

Benefit: Immediate source control, shorter antibiotic course (7-14 days post-op)

Curative but function-limiting - discuss goals of care.

Osteomyelitis Recurrence Risk

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis has 20-30% recurrence rate even after treatment. Risk factors: inadequate debridement, resistant organisms, persistent neuropathy and pressure, poor glucose control. All patients need lifelong foot surveillance and pressure offloading even after cure.

Osteomyelitis requires prolonged treatment and high recurrence risk.

Surgical Management and Amputation Levels

Toe and Ray Amputations

Partial Foot Amputation Levels

LevelIndicationsHealing RateFunctional Impact
Toe (single)Isolated toe gangrene, osteomyelitis confined to phalanx90%Minimal - great toe removal affects push-off slightly
Ray (toe + metatarsal)Osteomyelitis involving metatarsal, web space infection80-90%Good if single ray; multiple rays cause transfer lesions
Transmetatarsal (TMA)Forefoot gangrene, multiple ray involvement, salvageable hindfoot50-70%Requires orthotics, equinus deformity risk
Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal)Extensive forefoot necrosis, Charcot midfoot40-60%Poor function, high revision to BKA rate

Surgical Principles:

Adequate Resection

  • Resect all infected/necrotic tissue until bleeding healthy bone
  • Leave no exposed bone at amputation site
  • Create viable soft tissue flap for coverage
  • Avoid tension on closure

Incomplete resection leads to failure.

Perfusion Assessment

  • Toe pressure greater than 30 mmHg predicts healing
  • TcPO2 greater than 30 mmHg at amputation level
  • Bleeding bone ends (paprika sign)
  • Consider revascularization first if borderline

Ischemic tissue will not heal - revascularize first.

Transmetatarsal Amputation (TMA) Key Point

TMA preserves weight-bearing on plantar hindfoot but requires adequate perfusion (toe pressure greater than 40 mmHg). Post-TMA, Achilles tendon is relatively stronger than dorsiflexors, causing equinus deformity. Patients need custom ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or rocker-bottom shoe to prevent plantar ulceration at the stump. Failure to offload = new ulcer = revision to BKA.

Partial foot amputations preserve length but require good perfusion.

Syme, Transtibial, and Transfemoral Amputations

Major Amputation Levels

LevelIndicationsHealing RateAmbulation Rate
Syme (ankle disarticulation)Hindfoot gangrene, failed TMA, Charcot ankle70-80%Good - end-bearing, no prosthesis needed for transfers
Transtibial (BKA)Failed Syme, extensive foot necrosis, osteomyelitis to hindfoot80-90%Excellent - 60-80% ambulate with prosthesis
Knee disarticulationIschemic BKA level, bilateral amputee (easier transfers)85-95%Good for transfers, limited prosthetic options
Transfemoral (AKA)Failed BKA, critical ischemia extending proximal90-95%Poor - 30-50% ambulate, high energy cost

Transtibial Amputation Technique:

BKA Surgical Steps

PreoperativeLevel Selection

Target length: 12-15 cm from tibial plateau (preserves knee function, allows prosthetic fitting)

Skin flaps: Long posterior (gastrocnemius myocutaneous) vs equal anterior-posterior (Burgess)

Perfusion check: Skin bleeding, toe pressure at tibial level greater than 30 mmHg

Longer stump = better function, but needs adequate perfusion.

IntraoperativeBone Division

Tibia: Divide 1 cm proximal to skin level, bevel anterior crest at 45 degrees

Fibula: Divide 2 cm proximal to tibia (prevents end impingement)

Smooth edges: File sharp bone edges, round borders

Bone preparation prevents painful neuromas and skin breakdown.

ClosureSoft Tissue Management

Nerves: Divide sharply, allow to retract proximally (prevents neuroma)

Vessels: Ligate individually (tibial and peroneal arteries and veins)

Muscle: Myodesis (suture muscle to bone) OR myoplasty (suture antagonists together)

Drain: Deep drain for 24-48 hours

Meticulous soft tissue technique reduces complications.

30-Day Mortality After Major Amputation

Transtibial amputation has 5-10% 30-day mortality in diabetics. Transfemoral amputation has 10-15% 30-day mortality. At 5 years, 50% of patients are dead (cardiac disease, stroke, renal failure). These are sick patients - optimize medically, involve palliative care early for goals of care discussion.

Major amputations are life-saving but have high mortality.

Post-Amputation Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Wound breakdown15-30%Ischemia, infection, tension, malnutritionDebridement, VAC therapy, revision to higher level if needed
Stump infection10-20%Diabetes, ischemia, polymicrobial wound infectionAntibiotics, surgical debridement, revise if bone infected
Phantom limb pain50-80%Pre-amputation pain, acute amputation (vs planned)Gabapentin, pregabalin, mirror therapy, TENS
Contracture (knee, hip)20-30%Prolonged bed rest, inadequate physiotherapyPrevention: early mobilization, splinting, stretching
Contralateral limb amputation30-50% at 3 yearsBilateral PAD, neuropathy, poor glucose controlAggressive surveillance, offloading, glycemic control

Guillotine vs Definitive Amputation

Q: When do you perform a guillotine amputation?

A: Guillotine amputation (open, no flap closure) is for life-threatening sepsis requiring urgent source control in an unstable patient. Cut through soft tissue and bone at same level, leave wound open, pack with gauze. Return to OR in 48-72 hours for definitive amputation with flap closure once patient stabilized. Modern ICU care has made this rare - most severe infections can be managed with debridement and antibiotics.

Amputation complications are common and impact rehabilitation.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Recurrent ulceration30-40% at 1 year, 60-70% at 5 yearsContinued neuropathy, poor offloading, non-complianceLifelong foot surveillance, custom orthotics, patient education
Osteomyelitis20-30% of deep ulcers (Wagner 2+)Probe-to-bone positive, chronic ulcer over 2 weeksSurgical debridement (curative) or 6-12 weeks antibiotics
Charcot neuroarthropathy0.1-0.9% of diabetics annuallyPeripheral neuropathy, trauma (often unrecognized)Acute phase: TCC immobilization; chronic: custom AFO, possible fusion
Amputation wound breakdown15-30% (higher in TMA)Ischemia, infection, tension on closure, malnutritionDebridement, VAC therapy, revision to higher level if needed
Contralateral limb ulcer/amputation30-50% at 3 yearsBilateral neuropathy and PAD, increased weight-bearing on contralateral sideAggressive surveillance, bilateral offloading, glycemic control
Sepsis and mortality5-10% of severe infectionsNecrotizing infection, delayed treatment, immunocompromisedICU admission, source control, broad-spectrum antibiotics, organ support
Phantom limb pain50-80% post-amputationPre-amputation pain, acute trauma, inadequate analgesiaGabapentin, pregabalin, mirror therapy, TENS, psychological support
Psychological distress30-50% (depression, anxiety)Loss of limb, loss of independence, chronic illness burdenScreen for depression, psychology referral, peer support groups

Recurrent Ulceration is the Norm, Not the Exception

Even after successful ulcer healing, 60-70% of diabetic patients develop a new ulcer within 5 years. This is because the underlying pathology (neuropathy, ischemia, biomechanical abnormalities) persists. Lifelong surveillance and prevention are essential - custom orthotics reduce recurrence by 50% but patient compliance is challenging. Every healed ulcer patient needs a prevention plan.

Charcot Foot Recognition

Acute Charcot: Warm, swollen, red foot in a neuropathic diabetic - easily mistaken for infection or DVT. Key difference: X-ray shows bone fragmentation and joint dislocation (not normal in infection). MRI shows bone edema. Management is NON-weight-bearing with TCC for 3-6 months until temperature difference less than 2°C. Walking on an acute Charcot foot causes irreversible deformity. Chronic Charcot with rocker-bottom deformity needs custom AFO or possible reconstructive surgery (realignment arthrodesis).

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

After Surgical Debridement or Minor Amputation

Wound Healing Timeline

Immediate PostoperativeDays 0-3

Wound management: Open wound packed with gauze soaked in saline or antiseptic

Offloading: Total contact cast or non-weight-bearing

Antibiotics: Continue culture-directed antibiotics (duration based on infection severity)

Glucose control: Target glucose 6-10 mmol/L (hyperglycemia impairs healing)

Nutrition: High-protein diet, vitamin C and zinc supplementation

DVT prophylaxis: LMWH if not ambulating

Initial phase focuses on infection control and wound preparation.

Granulation PhaseDays 4-14

Serial debridement: Return to OR or bedside debridement if necrotic tissue appears

VAC therapy: Consider for deep wounds - promotes granulation, reduces edema

Dressing changes: Daily to every 2-3 days based on exudate

Monitor healing: Wound measurements, photographs, signs of infection

Mobilization: Non-weight-bearing or protected weight-bearing with device

Granulation tissue should appear by week 1-2.

EpithelializationWeeks 2-6

Wound contraction: Measure weekly - expect 50% reduction by 4 weeks

Secondary healing vs closure: Small wounds heal by secondary intention; large wounds may need skin graft or flap

Progressive weight-bearing: Gradual transition from non-weight-bearing to protected weight-bearing

Rehabilitation: ROM exercises, gait training

Most wounds heal or are ready for closure by 4-6 weeks.

Maturation and PreventionWeeks 6-12

Custom orthotics: Once healed, custom insoles to prevent recurrence

Accommodative footwear: Extra depth shoes with rocker soles

Surveillance: Monthly podiatry for first 3 months, then every 3 months

Patient education: Daily foot checks, immediate reporting of new problems

Transition to prevention mode - recurrence is common.

Post-debridement care is intensive and prolonged - requires patient commitment.

After Major Amputation (BKA or AKA)

Rehabilitation Protocol

Immediate PostoperativeDays 0-7

Wound care: Drain usually removed day 2-3, dressing changes daily

Pain management: Multimodal analgesia (paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids PRN)

Phantom limb management: Gabapentin or pregabalin if phantom pain develops

Positioning: Avoid hip/knee flexion contractures - frequent extension

Early mobilization: Transfer to chair day 1, bed exercises

Prevent complications and maintain contralateral limb strength.

Wound Healing and ConditioningWeeks 1-6

Stump care: Keep clean and dry, monitor for infection/breakdown

Compression: Elastic bandage or shrinker sock to shape stump

Physiotherapy: Strengthening (especially hip extensors/abductors), ROM, balance

Mobility: Progress from wheelchair to walking frame with contralateral limb

Psychological support: Screen for depression, peer support programs

Focus on healing and preparing for prosthesis fitting.

Prosthetic FittingWeeks 6-12

Stump maturation: Volume reduction, scar maturation

Interim prosthesis: Adjustable socket, pneumatic limb - for gait training

Gait training: Weight-bearing, balance, stair climbing, outdoor walking

Definitive prosthesis: Fitted once stump volume stable (3-6 months)

Functional goals: Walking indoors, transfers, ADLs

Only 60-80% of BKA patients achieve functional ambulation.

Long-term AdaptationMonths 3-12

Prosthetic adjustment: Regular reviews, socket modifications

Contralateral limb protection: Surveillance, offloading, prevention

Cardiac rehabilitation: Amputation increases cardiac workload

Vocational assessment: Return to work planning if appropriate

Ongoing support: Diabetes management, psychology, peer support

Long-term success requires multidisciplinary support.

Functional Outcomes After Major Amputation

BKA: 60-80% achieve functional ambulation with prosthesis, 20-40% remain wheelchair-bound. AKA: Only 30-50% achieve functional ambulation, 50-70% wheelchair-bound. Bilateral amputees have very poor ambulation rates (less than 20%). Age, cardiac status, contralateral limb function, and cognitive status are key predictors. Set realistic expectations early.

Major amputation rehabilitation is long and challenging - outcomes vary widely.

Lifelong Prevention Strategy

Patient Responsibilities

Daily foot inspection: Check for redness, blisters, cuts (use mirror)

Proper footwear: Always wear shoes (never barefoot), check inside before wearing

Immediate reporting: New wound, pain, swelling, drainage

Compliance: Wear prescribed orthotics and accommodative shoes

Glucose control: Target HbA1c less than 7%

Patient engagement is critical for prevention.

Professional Surveillance

Podiatry every 3 months: Callus debridement, nail care, shoe check

Annual diabetic review: Monofilament test, vascular assessment, risk stratification

Orthotic review: Replace every 12-18 months or if worn

Diabetes optimization: Endocrinology input for control

Multidisciplinary clinic: Coordinate all specialties

Regular professional input prevents recurrence.

Prevention Interventions and Evidence

InterventionRecurrence ReductionEvidence Level
Custom orthotics (pressure-redistributing insoles)50% reduction in recurrenceLevel 1 (RCTs)
Structured patient education programs30-50% reduction in first ulcerLevel 1 (systematic review)
Regular podiatry care (every 4-12 weeks)40-60% reduction in amputationLevel 2 (cohort studies)
Multidisciplinary foot clinic50% reduction in major amputationLevel 1 (multiple RCTs)
Prophylactic Achilles lengthening75% reduction in forefoot recurrenceLevel 2 (case-control)

Prevention works - but requires sustained effort from patient and healthcare system.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors for Healing

FactorGood PrognosisPoor Prognosis
PerfusionToe pressure greater than 40 mmHg, palpable pulsesToe pressure less than 30 mmHg, critical ischemia
InfectionUninfected or mild infectionSevere infection with systemic signs, osteomyelitis
Ulcer sizeLess than 2 cm diameterGreater than 5 cm diameter (longer healing time)
Ulcer durationLess than 2 weeksGreater than 3 months (chronic wound, biofilm)
Glycemic controlHbA1c less than 7.5%HbA1c greater than 10% (impaired healing)
NutritionAlbumin greater than 35 g/LAlbumin less than 30 g/L (malnutrition)
ComplianceAdheres to offloading and follow-upNon-compliant (removes devices, misses appointments)

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Key predictors of amputation or mortality:

  1. Texas D3 classification (infected + ischemic): 50% amputation risk at 1 year
  2. Chronic kidney disease (eGFR less than 30): Doubles mortality risk
  3. Cardiac disease (prior MI, CCF): Major cause of death post-amputation
  4. Age greater than 75 years: Higher perioperative mortality, lower rehabilitation potential
  5. Albumin less than 30 g/L: Marker of malnutrition and frailty

Patients with 3 or more of these factors have very poor prognosis - palliative care discussion essential.

Survival After Major Amputation

Mortality rates (Aulivola 2004):

  • 30-day: BKA 10%, AKA 15%
  • 1-year: 30%
  • 3-year: 40%
  • 5-year: 50%

Causes of death: Cardiac disease (50%), stroke (15%), renal failure (10%), sepsis (10%)

Comparison: Similar to many Stage III cancers

Major amputation is a marker of advanced systemic disease.

Quality of Life

Functional outcomes:

  • BKA: 60-80% ambulate with prosthesis
  • AKA: 30-50% ambulate with prosthesis
  • Bilateral: Less than 20% ambulate

Independence: 40-60% maintain independent living

Return to work: Less than 20% if working before amputation

Depression: 30-50% meet criteria for major depression

QoL impairment is substantial - psychological support essential.

Discussing Prognosis with Patients

Many patients and families do not understand the poor prognosis after major amputation. It is our responsibility to explain: "After a below-knee amputation, about 1 in 3 patients will have died within 1 year, and about half within 5 years. Most deaths are from heart disease or stroke. About 6-8 out of 10 patients will be able to walk with a prosthetic leg, but it requires months of rehabilitation. Some patients may choose to focus on quality of life rather than limb salvage attempts." Document these discussions carefully for medicolegal protection.

Offloading and Wound Care

Offloading is Treatment, Not Adjunct

Offloading reduces plantar pressure by 80-90% and is THE most important intervention for plantar diabetic foot ulcers. Total contact casting (TCC) is gold standard. Removable devices (CAM walker, half-shoe) fail due to non-compliance - patients remove them at home. Non-removable devices work. Without offloading, ulcers do NOT heal regardless of other treatments.

Offloading Modalities

MethodPressure ReductionComplianceIndications
Total Contact Cast (TCC)80-90%100% (non-removable)Gold standard for plantar neuropathic ulcers
Instant Total Contact Cast (iTCC)75-85%100% (non-removable)Fiberglass wrap over CAM walker - easier application
CAM walker (removable)30-50%30-50% (patients remove it)Non-plantar ulcers, patient preference (but expect failure)
Custom orthotics20-40%VariablePrevention (Grade 0), healed ulcer recurrence prevention
Felted foam padding40-60%Good (adhesive keeps in place)Adjunct to other modalities, small ulcers

Wound Care Principles:

Sharp Debridement

  • Remove all callus, slough, necrotic tissue
  • Debride to bleeding healthy tissue
  • Perform weekly or more frequently
  • Send deep tissue for culture if infected

Debridement converts chronic to acute wound.

Moist Wound Healing

  • Avoid dry gauze (desiccates wound bed)
  • Use hydrogel, hydrocolloid, foam, alginate
  • Select based on exudate level
  • Change per manufacturer instructions

Moist environment promotes epithelialization.

Negative Pressure (VAC)

  • For deep wounds post-debridement
  • Promotes granulation tissue
  • Reduces edema and bacterial load
  • Change every 48-72 hours

VAC is adjunct, not replacement for debridement.

Advanced Therapies

  • Hyperbaric oxygen: Controversial, limited evidence
  • Growth factors (becaplermin): Modest benefit
  • Bioengineered skin: Apligraf, Dermagraft
  • Stem cells: Experimental

Most advanced therapies have limited evidence.

Multidisciplinary Team Approach

Multidisciplinary Care Reduces Amputations by 50%

Evidence from multiple RCTs and cohort studies shows that multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinics reduce major amputation rates by 50% compared to usual care. Key is coordination between podiatry, vascular surgery, endocrinology, infectious disease, orthopaedics, and rehabilitation. Weekly team meetings to review complex cases improve outcomes.

Core Team Members

Podiatrist: Wound assessment, debridement, offloading

Vascular surgeon: Revascularization assessment

Endocrinologist: Glucose control optimization

Infectious disease: Antibiotic stewardship

Orthopaedic surgeon: Amputation, Charcot reconstruction

Each discipline contributes specialized expertise.

Support Services

Diabetes educator: Self-management training

Dietitian: Nutrition optimization

Physiotherapist: Mobility, gait training

Occupational therapist: ADL adaptation

Prosthetist: Post-amputation limb fitting

Support services enable independence.

System Level

Outpatient clinic: Weekly multidisciplinary rounds

Inpatient service: Acute admissions, surgical cases

Home nursing: Wound care, monitoring

Community liaison: Ensure follow-up compliance

Database: Track outcomes, quality improvement

Organized systems deliver coordinated care.

Prevention Strategies

Diabetic Foot Prevention Protocol

All DiabeticsAnnual Screening

Risk stratification using IWGDF categories:

  • Low risk: Normal sensation, palpable pulses
  • Moderate risk: LOPS or PAD (not both)
  • High risk: LOPS + PAD, or prior ulcer/amputation

Examination: Monofilament, pulses, deformity, callus, footwear

Screen all diabetics annually - identify high-risk feet.

High RiskPatient Education

Daily foot inspection: Use mirror to check plantar surface

Immediate reporting: Any new wound, redness, warmth

Footwear: Proper fit, avoid barefoot walking, check inside shoes daily

Nail care: Straight across, no self-treatment of callus

Education empowers patients to prevent ulcers.

High RiskPreventive Podiatry

Regular debridement: Callus removal every 4-6 weeks

Custom orthotics: Redistribute pressure away from high-risk areas

Accommodative footwear: Extra depth, cushioned insoles

Prophylactic surgery: Consider Achilles lengthening if forefoot overload

Podiatry reduces ulcer incidence in high-risk feet.

All PatientsGlycemic Control

Target HbA1c less than 7% for most patients

Avoid hypoglycemia: Relaxed targets in elderly (less than 8%)

Multifactorial risk reduction: BP, lipids, smoking cessation

Good diabetes control prevents neuropathy progression.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

IWGDF Guidelines on Prevention (2019)

1
Bus SA et al • Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of prevention strategies in diabetic foot
  • Annual screening reduces ulcer incidence (RR 0.5)
  • Custom orthotics reduce recurrence in high-risk feet (RR 0.5)
  • Patient education alone has limited benefit - needs structured program
  • Multidisciplinary care reduces major amputation by 50%
Clinical Implication: Prevention is effective but requires systematic screening and multidisciplinary approach.
Limitation: Most evidence from observational studies; few RCTs in prevention.

Total Contact Casting vs Removable Cast Walker (Armstrong 2005)

1
Armstrong DG et al • Diabetes Care (2005)
Key Findings:
  • RCT: 50 patients with neuropathic plantar ulcers
  • TCC healing rate: 89% vs removable walker: 58%
  • Median time to healing: 33 days vs 49 days
  • Key finding: non-removable devices work because patients cannot remove them
Clinical Implication: Total contact casting is gold standard for offloading - non-removable design ensures compliance.
Limitation: Small sample size; requires trained personnel to apply TCC safely.

Diabetic Foot Infections: IDSA Clinical Practice Guidelines (2012)

1
Lipsky BA et al • Clin Infect Dis (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Consensus guidelines from international panel of experts
  • Classification: uninfected, mild, moderate, severe
  • Antibiotics for INFECTION (purulence or 2+ inflammation signs), NOT colonization
  • Empiric therapy based on severity; de-escalate based on culture
  • Osteomyelitis: 6 weeks antibiotics vs surgical debridement (both effective)
Clinical Implication: IDSA guidelines are international standard for diabetic foot infection diagnosis and treatment.
Limitation: Guidelines, not RCT; some recommendations based on expert opinion.

Outcomes After Major Lower Extremity Amputation in Diabetics (Aulivola 2004)

3
Aulivola B et al • J Vasc Surg (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective cohort: 715 patients with major amputation (BKA or AKA)
  • 30-day mortality: BKA 10%, AKA 15%
  • 1-year mortality: 30%; 5-year mortality: 50%
  • Ambulatory at 1 year: BKA 60%, AKA 30%
  • Contralateral amputation at 3 years: 30%
Clinical Implication: Major amputation has high mortality and morbidity - prevention and limb salvage are critical.
Limitation: Retrospective; outcomes may improve with modern vascular intervention.

Australian Diabetes Foot Network Audit (2020)

3
AIHW • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2020)
Key Findings:
  • 4,400 lower limb amputations per year in Australia
  • 85% occur in people with diabetes
  • Indigenous Australians: 4-8 times higher amputation rate
  • High-risk foot services reduce amputation by 50%
  • Cost: over $1.6 billion annually (direct healthcare costs)
Clinical Implication: Diabetic foot is major Australian health burden - targeted prevention and early intervention are cost-effective.
Limitation: Registry data subject to underreporting and coding errors.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Wagner Classification and Initial Management (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 62-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (duration 15 years) presents with a 3-week history of a non-healing ulcer on the plantar aspect of his right first metatarsal head. He has no pain but noticed drainage on his sock. On examination, there is a 2 cm diameter ulcer with surrounding callus. You probe the ulcer and feel bone. There is no erythema beyond 1 cm from the ulcer edge, no purulent discharge. Pulses are palpable. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Wagner Grade 2 diabetic foot ulcer (deep to bone) with probable osteomyelitis based on positive probe-to-bone test. I would take a systematic approach: First, assess diabetes control (HbA1c), vascular status (pulses present but would check ABI and toe pressures), and neuropathy severity (monofilament test). Second, rule out active infection - this appears uninfected (no purulence, erythema less than 2 cm, no systemic signs), so I would NOT start antibiotics. Third, investigate for osteomyelitis with plain radiographs initially, then MRI if clinical suspicion high (probe-to-bone positive). Fourth, management includes sharp debridement of callus and wound base, offloading with total contact cast (gold standard for plantar ulcers), and moist wound dressing. If osteomyelitis confirmed, I would offer either surgical debridement (curative, shorter antibiotic course) or 6-12 weeks of culture-directed antibiotics. I would counsel about the need for lifelong foot care and high recurrence risk.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Wagner Grade 2 = deep to bone/tendon
Probe-to-bone test positive = high probability of osteomyelitis
No infection signs = no antibiotics yet
Offloading with TCC is critical for healing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Starting antibiotics for uninfected ulcer (treat infection, not colonization)
✗Missing osteomyelitis assessment (probe-to-bone is key clinical test)
✗Not mentioning offloading (most important intervention for plantar ulcers)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the probe-to-bone test likelihood ratio?"
"How would you manage confirmed osteomyelitis?"
"What is your offloading strategy and why?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Infected Diabetic Foot with Ischemia (3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 70-year-old woman with diabetes presents with 48 hours of worsening right foot pain, swelling, and fevers (38.5°C). She has a chronic ulcer on her lateral forefoot. On examination, there is extensive erythema to mid-foot, purulent discharge, and crepitus in the forefoot. Her foot is cool with absent DP and PT pulses. Her WCC is 18, CRP 250. Plain radiograph shows gas in soft tissues and bone destruction of the 4th and 5th metatarsals. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a severe diabetic foot infection (IDSA classification) with critical limb ischemia, representing a limb-threatening emergency. My immediate management: First, resuscitation - IV fluids, analgesia, and empiric broad-spectrum IV antibiotics covering Gram-positives, Gram-negatives, and anaerobes (I would use piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g TDS plus vancomycin if MRSA risk). Second, urgent vascular surgery consultation for revascularization assessment - absent pulses and cool foot suggest critical ischemia. I would request urgent duplex ultrasound or CT angiography. Third, urgent surgical debridement - gas in tissues and crepitus suggest necrotizing infection requiring emergency debridement. In theatre, I would perform extensive debridement of all necrotic and infected tissue, likely requiring ray or partial foot amputation of the 4th and 5th metatarsals. I would leave the wound open and plan second-look in 48 hours. Fourth, ICU admission for sepsis management and organ support if needed. Fifth, multidisciplinary involvement - infectious disease for antibiotic stewardship, endocrinology for glucose control, vascular for revascularization timing (likely after infection controlled). I would counsel the patient and family about high risk of major amputation if infection not controlled or if revascularization fails.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Texas D3 classification (infected + ischemic) - worst prognosis
Gas on X-ray + crepitus = necrotizing infection = surgical emergency
Revascularization needed but AFTER infection control
Broad-spectrum IV antibiotics immediately
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting revascularization before infection control (risks spreading infection)
✗Inadequate initial debridement (need to remove all necrotic tissue)
✗Not recognizing severity and urgency (this is a limb and life-threatening emergency)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the IDSA criteria for severe infection?"
"When would you revascularize - before or after debridement?"
"What if the foot is not salvageable?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Amputation Level Selection (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"You have performed extensive debridement for forefoot gangrene in a 68-year-old diabetic man. After removing the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rays, the residual foot has viable hindfoot tissue but questionable perfusion. Toe pressure is 32 mmHg. The patient asks whether you will be able to save the remaining foot or if he needs a below-knee amputation. How do you counsel him and what determines your decision?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a difficult decision between attempting transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) versus proceeding to transtibial amputation (BKA). My decision-making process: First, assess perfusion adequacy - toe pressure of 32 mmHg is borderline (guideline is greater than 30 mmHg predicts healing, but greater than 40 mmHg is more reliable). I would also look for bleeding bone at the proposed amputation level (paprika sign) and consider TcPO2 measurement if available. Second, consider the risk-benefit: TMA preserves length and allows better function if it heals, but has 50-70% healing rate (versus 80-90% for BKA). If TMA fails, the patient faces revision to BKA - two operations, prolonged recovery, and delayed rehabilitation. Third, patient factors - is the patient physiologically stable for prolonged healing? Do they have adequate contralateral limb to bear weight during healing? What are their goals? I would counsel: 'Your perfusion is borderline. If we attempt to save the remaining foot with a transmetatarsal amputation, there is a 50-70% chance it will heal, but if it breaks down, you will need a below-knee amputation. A below-knee amputation has an 80-90% healing rate and most patients can walk with a prosthesis. I can offer either approach - attempted limb salvage with TMA knowing revision may be needed, or definitive BKA with better healing. What matters most to you?' I would involve vascular surgery to optimize perfusion before final decision.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Toe pressure greater than 30 mmHg = borderline; greater than 40 mmHg = reliable
TMA healing rate 50-70% vs BKA 80-90%
Shared decision-making - explain tradeoffs clearly
Vascular optimization may improve marginal perfusion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Making decision without patient involvement (this is preference-sensitive)
✗Not recognizing borderline perfusion (32 mmHg is marginal)
✗Not mentioning option for vascular input (may be able to improve perfusion)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the healing rates for different amputation levels?"
"How would you optimize perfusion before amputation?"
"What are the functional outcomes after BKA?"

MCQ Practice Points

Classification Question

Q: A diabetic foot ulcer extending to bone but without signs of infection or ischemia is which Texas classification?

A: Texas C0 (depth grade C = penetrates to bone, stage 0 = no infection and no ischemia). This is equivalent to Wagner Grade 2 but with the added information that there is no infection or ischemia. Treatment is surgical debridement and offloading, with imaging to rule out osteomyelitis.

Infection Diagnosis Question

Q: What are the IDSA diagnostic criteria for diabetic foot infection?

A: Purulence OR 2 or more of: warmth, erythema, lymphangitis, edema, pain. Importantly, a positive swab culture WITHOUT these clinical signs is colonization, not infection, and does not require antibiotics. Tissue culture after debridement is more reliable than swab culture.

Offloading Question

Q: What is the gold standard offloading method for plantar diabetic foot ulcers?

A: Total contact cast (TCC), which reduces plantar pressure by 80-90%. The key advantage is that it is non-removable, ensuring 100% compliance. Removable devices (CAM walker, half-shoe) have poor compliance as patients remove them at home. Instant TCC (fiberglass wrap over CAM walker) is an easier alternative with similar efficacy.

Osteomyelitis Question

Q: What is the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diabetic foot osteomyelitis?

A: Sensitivity 90%, specificity 80%. MRI is the gold standard imaging modality. Look for: T1-weighted dark signal in bone marrow (edema), T2/STIR bright signal (inflammation), and gadolinium enhancement. Plain radiographs have 50% sensitivity (late sign - bone destruction visible after 2-4 weeks). Probe-to-bone test has positive likelihood ratio of 6.4.

Amputation Healing Question

Q: What toe pressure predicts healing after transmetatarsal amputation?

A: Toe pressure greater than 40 mmHg predicts reliable healing (some sources use greater than 30 mmHg as minimum threshold, but greater than 40 mmHg is more reliable). TcPO2 greater than 30 mmHg at the amputation level is also predictive. If perfusion is inadequate, revascularization (angioplasty or bypass) should be performed before amputation.

Evidence Question

Q: What is the evidence for multidisciplinary diabetic foot care?

A: Multiple studies show 50% reduction in major amputation rate with multidisciplinary foot clinics compared to usual care. Key elements: podiatry, vascular surgery, endocrinology, infectious disease, orthopaedics working together. IWGDF guidelines (2019) give this a Grade A recommendation based on systematic review evidence.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

AIHW Diabetes Foot Data

Annual Statistics (2023):

  • 4,400+ lower limb amputations in Australia
  • 85% occur in people with diabetes
  • Indigenous Australians: 4-8× higher amputation rate
  • Direct healthcare cost: over $1.6 billion annually

High-Risk Foot Services:

  • Reduce amputation by 50% (evidence-based)
  • Multidisciplinary model endorsed by Diabetes Australia
  • Podiatry services for high-risk foot available

Australian data supports investment in prevention.

National Guidelines

eTG Antibiotic Guidelines:

  • Mild infection: Flucloxacillin + Metronidazole
  • Severe infection: Piperacillin-tazobactam (PBS listed)
  • Osteomyelitis: 6 weeks culture-directed therapy

ACSQHC Safety Standards:

  • Annual diabetic foot screening (QI target)
  • High-risk foot referral pathway
  • Documented foot risk stratification

Australian guidelines align with IDSA international standards.

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements:

  • Annual foot screening: Document monofilament test, pulses, deformity. Failure to screen is negligent.
  • High-risk foot referral: Document referral to podiatry or high-risk foot service. Delayed referral for high-risk foot is common litigation trigger.
  • Informed consent for amputation: Document discussion of amputation level options, healing rates, functional outcomes, alternative of limb salvage vs definitive amputation. Patients must understand tradeoffs.
  • DVT prophylaxis: All diabetic foot patients admitted with infection are high VTE risk. Document prophylaxis or reason for omission.
  • Multidisciplinary involvement: Document vascular, infectious disease, endocrinology input for complex cases. Solo decision-making for complex limb salvage is high-risk.

Common litigation scenarios: Delayed amputation leading to sepsis; inadequate informed consent for amputation level; failure to attempt revascularization before amputation; amputation at wrong level (too distal) leading to failure and revision.

DIABETIC FOOT MANAGEMENT

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Classifications

  • •Wagner Grade 0 = intact skin (prevent); 1 = superficial; 2 = deep to bone; 3 = abscess/osteomyelitis; 4 = forefoot gangrene; 5 = whole foot gangrene
  • •Texas = 4x4 grid: Depth A-D (superficial, tendon, bone, infected) + Stage 0-3 (clean, infection, ischemia, both)
  • •IDSA infection: Mild (less than 2 cm erythema), Moderate (greater than 2 cm or deep), Severe (systemic signs)
  • •PEDIS = Perfusion + Extent + Depth + Infection + Sensation (research classification)

Diagnostic Tests

  • •Probe-to-bone: positive LR 6.4 for osteomyelitis (sterile probe feels hard gritty bone)
  • •MRI: gold standard for osteomyelitis (90% sensitive, 80% specific)
  • •Monofilament: 10g at 9 sites - unable to feel at 4+ sites = LOPS
  • •Toe pressure: greater than 30 mmHg minimum, greater than 40 mmHg reliable for healing

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Uninfected ulcer: offloading (TCC) + sharp debridement + moist dressing (NO antibiotics)
  • •Mild infection: oral antibiotics 1-2 weeks (cefalexin or amoxicillin-clavulanate)
  • •Severe infection: IV broad-spectrum (pip-tazo + vancomycin) + urgent surgical debridement
  • •Osteomyelitis: surgical debridement (curative) OR 6-12 weeks antibiotics (conservative)

Amputation Levels

  • •Toe 90%, Ray 80-90%, Transmetatarsal 50-70%, Syme 70-80%, Transtibial 80-90%, Transfemoral 90-95% healing
  • •Higher level = better healing but worse function - aim for most distal viable level
  • •TMA needs toe pressure greater than 40 mmHg + AFO post-op (prevent equinus ulcer)
  • •BKA mortality: 10% at 30 days, 30% at 1 year, 50% at 5 years

Critical Interventions

  • •Offloading: TCC reduces pressure 80-90%, non-removable ensures compliance
  • •Revascularization: do AFTER infection control (not before - risks spreading infection)
  • •Multidisciplinary care: reduces amputation by 50% (podiatry, vascular, endo, ID, ortho)
  • •Prevention: annual screening, custom orthotics, patient education (85% amputations preventable)
Quick Stats
Reading Time183 min
Related Topics

Achilles Tendon Rupture

Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Calcaneal Fractures

Charcot Neuroarthropathy