Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

First MTP Joint Arthrodesis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

First MTP Joint Arthrodesis

Gold standard surgical treatment for end-stage hallux rigidus and severe hallux valgus: optimal fusion position, surgical technique, and complications

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

FIRST MTP JOINT ARTHRODESIS

Gold Standard for End-Stage Hallux Rigidus | Optimal Fusion Position Critical | High Union Rate

90-95%Union rate
5-15°Dorsiflexion angle
10-15°Valgus angle
85-90%Patient satisfaction

COUGHLIN-SHURNAS CLASSIFICATION (HALLUX RIGIDUS)

Grade 0
PatternNormal ROM, no pain on motion
TreatmentObservation
Grade 1
PatternMild restriction 20-40°, minimal osteophytes
TreatmentCheilectomy
Grade 2
PatternModerate restriction 10-20°, moderate osteophytes
TreatmentCheilectomy or interpositional arthroplasty
Grade 3
PatternSevere restriction under 10°, large osteophytes
TreatmentArthrodesis or arthroplasty
Grade 4
PatternSame as Grade 3 plus IP joint arthritis
TreatmentArthrodesis preferred

Critical Must-Knows

  • Optimal position: 5-15° dorsiflexion relative to ground, 10-15° valgus, neutral rotation
  • Position test: Toe should just clear ground when simulating toe-off in stance phase
  • Fixation: Dorsal plate with interfragmentary lag screw provides highest biomechanical stability
  • Sesamoid excision controversial: Increases transfer metatarsalgia risk but may be needed for positioning
  • Nonunion rate: 5-10% overall, higher in smokers and inadequate fixation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Position is EVERYTHING - too much dorsiflexion causes transfer metatarsalgia, too little prevents toe-off
  • "
    Prepare joint surfaces to bleeding subchondral bone - critical for union
  • "
    Avoid IP joint hyperextension - suggests excessive first MTP dorsiflexion
  • "
    Most common complication is transfer metatarsalgia from malposition or excessive shortening

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Hallux rigidus arthrodesis with cup-and-cone preparation
Click to expand
Hallux rigidus arthrodesis with cup-and-cone preparation. Top row: Preoperative AP and lateral radiographs showing joint space narrowing and osteophytes at the first MTP joint. Bottom row: Postoperative radiographs demonstrating successful fusion with dorsal plate and compression screw fixation.
Hallux valgus correction with first MTP arthrodesis
Click to expand
Hallux valgus correction with first MTP arthrodesis. Top row: Preoperative AP and lateral radiographs showing lateral deviation of the hallux with increased hallux valgus angle. Bottom row: Postoperative radiographs showing corrected alignment after arthrodesis using dorsal plate and compression screw.

Critical First MTP Arthrodesis Exam Points

Fusion Position is Critical

5-15° dorsiflexion relative to ground (NOT to first metatarsal axis). Test by simulating stance phase - hallux should just clear floor at toe-off. Too much = transfer metatarsalgia. Too little = impaired push-off.

Prepare Surfaces Meticulously

Flat-cut or cup-and-cone technique. Debride to bleeding subchondral bone. Maximum bone contact critical for union. Avoid excessive shortening (over 5mm increases transfer metatarsalgia).

Dorsal Plate Fixation Preferred

Biomechanically superior to crossed screws or other configurations. Add interfragmentary lag screw for compression. Avoid plantar plate (prominence, irritation).

Sesamoid Decision Complex

Removal increases transfer metatarsalgia. Only excise if preventing optimal position or severely arthritic. Preserve if possible. Lateral sesamoid preservation more critical than medial.

Quick Decision Guide: First MTP Arthrodesis vs Alternatives

Clinical ScenarioPrimary OptionAlternativeKey Pearl
Grade 1-2 hallux rigidus, young active patientCheilectomyObservation, activity modification70% good results if under 50% joint involvement
Grade 3 hallux rigidus, active patient under 50 yearsFirst MTP arthrodesisInterpositional arthroplasty, hemiarthroplastyArthrodesis most predictable for pain relief
Grade 4 hallux rigidus with IP joint arthritisFirst MTP arthrodesis (mandatory)None - other options failIP arthritis is absolute indication for fusion
Severe hallux valgus with arthritis, failed bunionectomyFirst MTP arthrodesisRevision arthroplastySalvage option for failed previous surgery
Mnemonic

DVD-VNOptimal Fusion Position: DVD-VN

D
Dorsiflexion
5-15° relative to ground (NOT metatarsal)
V
Valgus
10-15° to match contralateral side
D
Determine by stance
Hallux just clears ground at toe-off simulation
V
Verify rotation
Neutral - toenail faces ceiling when supine
N
No shortening
Limit to under 5mm to prevent transfer metatarsalgia

Memory Hook:DVD-VN: Watch the DVD on Valgus and Neutral position - the key to successful MTP fusion!

Mnemonic

FRESHSurface Preparation Steps: FRESH

F
Flat or cup-and-cone
Choose technique based on deformity
R
Remove cartilage completely
Down to bleeding subchondral bone
E
Even surfaces
Maximum contact area for union
S
Size match
Avoid mismatch that creates gaps
H
Holes for fixation
Drilling for lag screw before final positioning

Memory Hook:Keep the joint surfaces FRESH - Fresh bleeding bone equals good union!

Mnemonic

MINTSComplications to Counsel: MINTS

M
Malposition
Most common - causes functional impairment
I
Infection
1-3% superficial, under 1% deep
N
Nonunion
5-10%, higher in smokers
T
Transfer metatarsalgia
From malposition or excessive shortening
S
Shoe wear difficulty
Stiff toe requires modifications

Memory Hook:Offer patients MINTS after surgery counseling - they'll need the fresh breath after hearing the risks!

Overview and Epidemiology

Historical Context

First MTP arthrodesis was first described by Clutton in 1894 for treatment of tuberculous arthritis. The procedure evolved to become the gold standard for end-stage hallux rigidus in the mid-20th century. Modern fixation techniques have improved union rates from 70-80% with Kirschner wires to 90-95% with rigid plate-and-screw constructs.

Why Arthrodesis Remains Gold Standard

Despite advances in arthroplasty implants, first MTP arthrodesis continues to be preferred for end-stage disease because: Predictable pain relief (95% success), Durable results (20-year survivorship over 90%), Maintains weightbearing (unlike resection arthroplasty), and No implant-related complications (loosening, wear, metallosis).

Primary Indications

Hallux Rigidus

  • Grade 3-4: End-stage disease with severe pain
  • Failed cheilectomy: Progressive symptoms
  • IP joint involvement: Contraindication to arthroplasty
  • Young, active patients: Most durable option

Hallux Valgus

  • Severe arthritis: Bunion with joint destruction
  • Failed arthroplasty: Salvage procedure
  • Inflammatory arthropathy: Rheumatoid, psoriatic
  • Neuromuscular deformity: Spastic, recurrent deformity

Traumatic Conditions

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: Intra-articular fracture sequelae
  • Avascular necrosis: Sesamoid or metatarsal head
  • Unstable fracture-dislocation: Acute salvage

Inflammatory Arthritis

  • Rheumatoid arthritis: Severe erosive disease
  • Psoriatic arthritis: Dactylitis with joint destruction
  • Gout: Chronic tophaceous arthropathy

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

First MTP Joint Anatomy

The first metatarsophalangeal joint is a condyloid joint permitting dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, and limited abduction-adduction. Normal dorsiflexion is 65-75° and plantarflexion 20-30°. The joint is stabilized by:

Plantar Structures

  • Plantar plate: Fibrocartilaginous thickening of capsule
  • Sesamoid complex: Medial and lateral sesamoids embedded in flexor hallucis brevis
  • Intersesamoid ligament: Connects sesamoids across plantar surface
  • Collateral ligaments: Medial stronger than lateral

Neurovascular Structures

  • Medial digital nerve: Branch of medial plantar nerve (dorsomedial)
  • Lateral digital nerve: Branch of deep peroneal nerve (dorsolateral)
  • Blood supply: Dorsal metatarsal artery, plantar digital arteries
  • At risk: Nerves during medial or dorsal approach

Sesamoid Biomechanics

The sesamoids increase the mechanical advantage of the flexor hallucis brevis by displacing the tendon plantarward, creating a greater moment arm. Sesamoid excision reduces hallux plantarflexion strength by 50% and shifts weight laterally to lesser metatarsals. Preserve sesamoids whenever position permits to maintain biomechanical function.

Biomechanics of Fusion Position

Normal gait requires approximately 65° of first MTP dorsiflexion during terminal stance and toe-off. After arthrodesis, the IP joint must compensate, requiring:

JointNormal ROMAfter MTP FusionCompensation Needed
First MTP65-75° dorsiflexion0° (fused)IP joint provides all motion
IP joint0-10° dorsiflexion20-30° dorsiflexion2-3× normal excursion required
Ankle20° dorsiflexionUnchangedSlight increase if MTP too plantarflexed

Position relative to ground is critical because patients stand and walk on the ground, not their metatarsal axis. The hallux must clear the ground during swing phase and load appropriately during stance.

Why 5-15° Dorsiflexion?

The 5-15° of dorsiflexion relative to the weightbearing surface allows: (1) Hallux to clear ground during swing phase, (2) Progressive loading during stance without jamming into dorsiflexion, (3) IP joint to dorsiflex further without hyperextension, (4) Normal gait mechanics with minimal limp. Too much dorsiflexion (over 20°) causes transfer metatarsalgia by unloading the first ray. Too little (under 5°) causes impaired push-off and increased forefoot pressure.

Classification of Hallux Rigidus

Coughlin-Shurnas Classification (Most Common)

Based on radiographic and clinical findings. Guides treatment selection.

GradeDorsiflexion ROMRadiographic FindingsTreatment
040-60° (normal 65-75°)Normal, no osteophytesObservation, activity modification
130-40°Minimal osteophytes, under 25% joint space narrowingCheilectomy (70% success)
210-30°Moderate osteophytes, 25-50% joint narrowing, subchondral sclerosisCheilectomy or interpositional arthroplasty
3Under 10° or painfulLarge osteophytes, over 50% joint narrowing, cysts, sesamoid enlargementArthrodesis or arthroplasty
4Same as Grade 3Plus IP joint arthritisArthrodesis (arthroplasty contraindicated)

Grade 3 vs 4 Distinction

Grade 4 is an absolute indication for arthrodesis because IP joint arthritis prevents compensation after arthroplasty. The IP joint MUST dorsiflex 20-30° after MTP fusion to allow normal gait. If the IP joint is arthritic, this compensation is impossible and arthroplasty will fail. Always examine and radiograph the IP joint before offering arthroplasty.

Hattrup-Johnson Classification

Simpler three-grade system based primarily on radiographs.

GradeRadiographic FindingsTypical Treatment
IMild to moderate osteophytes, preserved joint spaceCheilectomy
IIModerate osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosisCheilectomy, consider arthroplasty
IIISevere changes, significant joint space loss, large cystsArthrodesis or arthroplasty

Less granular than Coughlin-Shurnas but simpler for quick classification.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain location: Dorsal (osteophyte impingement) or diffuse (arthritis)
  • Functional limitation: Difficulty with toe-off, running, stairs
  • Footwear issues: Cannot wear dress shoes, high heels
  • Previous treatment: Orthotics, injections, cheilectomy
  • Occupation: Manual labor, prolonged standing requirements
  • Activity level: Recreational athletics, walking distance

Examination

  • Look: Dorsal prominence, hallux valgus, toe clawing
  • Feel: Tenderness over osteophytes, sesamoids
  • Move: Dorsiflexion ROM (compare to contralateral)
  • Grind test: Pain with axial compression and rotation
  • IP joint: ROM and crepitus (rule out arthritis)
  • Neurovascular: Sensation intact, capillary refill

Gait Analysis

  • Antalgic pattern: Short stance phase on affected side
  • Reduced push-off: Decreased terminal stance dorsiflexion
  • Lateral weight shift: Offloading medial forefoot
  • Compensatory ankle motion: Increased dorsiflexion

Shoe Examination

  • Dorsal wear: From toe dragging or stiff-soled shoes
  • Medial sole thinning: From lateral weight shift
  • Shoe modifications: Patient-created stretches, pads
  • Orthotic devices: Previous failed conservative treatment

Red Flags Suggesting Alternative Diagnosis

Suspect other pathology if: Acute onset without trauma (gout, infection), Systemic symptoms (fever, weight loss - inflammatory arthritis, malignancy), Proximal foot pain (midfoot arthritis), Night pain (tumor, referred pain), Severe osteopenia on radiograph (metabolic bone disease, tumor).

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

First LineWeight-Bearing Radiographs

AP, lateral, oblique views of the foot. Assess joint space, osteophytes, subchondral changes, sesamoid position. Lateral view critical for assessing dorsal osteophyte size and first metatarsal declination angle.

Special ViewsAxial Sesamoid View

Evaluates sesamoid arthritis and position. Important if considering sesamoid preservation vs excision during arthrodesis. Severe sesamoid arthritis may necessitate excision.

If IndicatedCT Scan

Rarely needed but useful for: (1) Assessing subchondral cyst extent, (2) Evaluating sesamoid position and arthritis, (3) Planning bone graft needs, (4) Assessing lesser MTP joints if considering metatarsal osteotomy.

If Systemic DiseaseLaboratory Studies

ESR, CRP: If infection suspected Uric acid: If acute presentation suggests gout Rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP: If polyarticular involvement

Radiographic Measurements for Fusion Position

Pre-operative planning: Measure (1) First metatarsal declination angle (normal 15-25° below horizontal), (2) Contralateral hallux valgus angle (to match), (3) Amount of bone resection needed (limit to under 5mm), (4) Sesamoid position (excision needed if preventing neutral position). Post-operative check: Hallux should be 5-15° dorsiflexed relative to weightbearing surface on lateral radiograph with foot loaded.

Non-Operative Management

Conservative Treatment Options

Non-operative management is the first-line for grades 0-2 hallux rigidus. Success rates decline with advancing grade.

Footwear Modifications

  • Stiff-soled shoes: Rocker bottom to reduce MTP motion
  • Wide toe box: Accommodates dorsal osteophytes
  • Morton's extension: Carbon fiber or steel plate in sole
  • Low heels: Reduces dorsiflexion demand

Orthotic Devices

  • Morton's extension in orthotic: Limits MTP motion
  • First ray cutout: Offloads painful first MTP
  • Metatarsal pad: Transfers load to lesser metatarsals
  • Custom orthotics: Biomechanical correction

Injectable Treatments

  • Corticosteroid injection: Temporary relief (3-6 months)
  • Hyaluronic acid: Limited evidence, FDA off-label
  • PRP: Investigational, no proven benefit
  • Limit to 2-3 injections: Cartilage damage risk

Activity Modification

  • Avoid high-impact activities: Running, jumping sports
  • Swimming, cycling: Low-impact alternatives
  • Shorter walking distances: Prevents pain exacerbation
  • Gradual return: If symptoms improve

Success rates: Grade 1 (50-60% long-term success), Grade 2 (30-40%), Grade 3-4 (under 20%). Most patients with grade 3-4 disease progress to surgery within 2 years of symptom onset.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
first mtp arthrodesis management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for first mtp arthrodesisCredit: OrthoVellum

Early-Stage Disease Algorithm

Goal: Preserve motion while relieving impingement pain

Treatment Progression

70% success rateFirst-Line Surgical: Cheilectomy

Indications: Dorsal osteophyte impingement, preserved joint space (over 50%), dorsiflexion over 30°

Technique: Remove dorsal 30% of metatarsal head, dorsal and medial osteophytes. Preserve plantar 70% to maintain stability.

Expected outcomes: Pain relief in 70%, maintain or improve dorsiflexion by 10-20°

2-5 years laterIf Cheilectomy Fails

Options: Revision cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy (for plantarflexed hallux), Interpositional arthroplasty, Arthrodesis

Consider arthrodesis if: Progressive arthritis on radiographs, Patient over 50 years, Lower functional demands

When Cheilectomy Will Fail

Predictors of poor cheilectomy outcome: (1) Under 50% joint space remaining, (2) Dorsiflexion under 20° pre-operatively, (3) Moderate to severe pain at rest (not just impingement pain), (4) Pan-articular disease on radiograph (not just dorsal). These patients should be offered arthrodesis or arthroplasty primarily.

End-Stage Disease Algorithm

Goal: Predictable pain relief with acceptable function

Treatment Decision

Gold standardFirst Choice: Arthrodesis

Advantages: Predictable pain relief (95%), No implant-related complications, Durable (over 90% at 20 years), Can bear full weight

Indications: Young active patients (under 60), Manual laborers, Failed cheilectomy, Rheumatoid arthritis, Grade 4 with IP arthritis

Patient must accept: Loss of MTP motion, Shoe wear modifications, Possible transfer metatarsalgia (5-10%)

Selected patientsAlternative: Arthroplasty

Hemiarthroplasty or total MTP arthroplasty

Advantages: Preserves motion (20-40° dorsiflexion), Less transfer metatarsalgia, Easier shoe wear

Disadvantages: Implant failure (10-20% at 10 years), Limited longevity, Not for high-demand patients

Absolute contraindication: Grade 4 with IP arthritis (no IP compensation)

Rarely performedSalvage: Resection Arthroplasty (Keller)

Historical procedure - removed 1/3 of proximal phalanx

Problems: Transfer metatarsalgia (80%), Cock-up toe, Weak push-off, Poor cosmesis

Only indication today: Elderly, non-ambulatory, severe soft tissue problems preventing arthrodesis or implant

Arthroplasty vs Arthrodesis Decision

The key question: Can the patient accept a fused MTP joint? Most patients adapt well and prefer predictable pain relief over preserved motion. Consider arthroplasty only if: (1) Patient strongly desires motion preservation, (2) Bilateral disease (at least one side mobile), (3) Low to moderate activity level, (4) NO IP joint arthritis, (5) Willing to accept revision risk. Default to arthrodesis for most patients - better long-term outcomes.

Surgical Technique: First MTP Arthrodesis

Pre-operative Planning

Consent Points

  • Nonunion: 5-10% (higher in smokers, diabetics)
  • Malposition: 5-15% (most common complication)
  • Transfer metatarsalgia: 10-20% (from position or shortening)
  • Infection: 1-3% superficial, under 1% deep
  • Nerve injury: Numbness medial or lateral hallux (5%)
  • Hardware prominence: May require removal (5-10%)
  • Shoe wear difficulty: Stiff toe requires modifications

Equipment Checklist

  • Implants: Dorsal locking plate (small or mini fragment)
  • Screws: 3.5mm or 4.0mm cortical screws, 4.0mm lag screw
  • Power tools: Sagittal saw, burr, drill
  • Reduction aids: Pointed reduction forceps, K-wires
  • Bone graft: Preparation if large cyst or nonunion risk
  • Imaging: Mini C-arm for intra-operative positioning

Patient Positioning

Setup Checklist

Step 1Position

Supine position on standard operating table. Bump under ipsilateral hip to internally rotate leg (easier medial approach access).

  • Contralateral leg: Abducted to allow C-arm access
  • Operating leg: Free draped from mid-calf distally
  • Tourniquet: Thigh or ankle (surgeon preference)
Step 2Imaging Setup

Mini C-arm positioned from opposite side. Confirm adequate AP, lateral, and oblique views before draping. Critical for assessing fusion position intra-operatively.

Step 3Sterile Prep and Drape
  • Prep: Ankle to toes circumferentially
  • Draping: Free drape foot to allow manipulation
  • Position test: Simulate weightbearing to check hallux position

Positioning Pearl

The position test is performed BEFORE draping: Hold the foot in simulated weightbearing (ankle 90°, forefoot loaded), then simulate toe-off by lifting the heel. The hallux should just clear the table surface. Mark this position and reference it throughout the case. After draping, simulate stance phase repeatedly to confirm optimal fusion angle.

Dorsomedial Approach (Preferred)

Provides excellent exposure of MTP joint with minimal neurovascular risk.

Step-by-Step Approach

Step 1Skin Incision

Landmarks: Start 1cm proximal to MTP joint crease over first metatarsal, extend distally over medial proximal phalanx for 4-5cm.

Orientation: Slightly curved, centered over dorsomedial joint line. Avoid directly dorsal (crosses extensor hallucis longus) or too medial (crosses medial digital nerve).

Step 2Superficial Dissection

Identify and protect medial dorsal cutaneous nerve - branches across incision in proximal 1/3. Retract or divide small branches (patient will have numbness if divided).

Incise capsule longitudinally along dorsomedial border of metatarsal and phalanx. Develop full-thickness flaps medially and laterally to expose entire joint.

Danger Zone

Medial digital nerve runs just plantar to incision. Avoid deep dissection on plantar-medial aspect. Use retractors gently. Nerve injury causes permanent medial hallux numbness and painful neuroma.

Step 3Deep Dissection

Elevate periosteum from dorsal metatarsal head and proximal phalanx base. Create subperiosteal flaps to protect soft tissues.

Extensor hallucis longus: Retract laterally (stays in sheath). Can divide if severely contracted but usually preserve.

Joint exposure: Complete capsulotomy, remove osteophytes with rongeur to improve visualization.

Step 4Sesamoid Management

Decision point: Preserve vs excise sesamoids

If preserving: Leave sesamoid complex attached to plantar capsule. Position joint to avoid sesamoid impingement.

If excising: Subperiosteal dissection plantar to metatarsal head, deliver sesamoid dorsally through arthrotomy, excise with attached flexor hallucis brevis tendon slip. Risk: Weakens plantarflexion, increases transfer metatarsalgia.

Sesamoid Decision

Preserve sesamoids if possible - maintains mechanical advantage of flexor hallucis brevis. Indications for excision: (1) Preventing optimal hallux position (pulling into plantarflexion or varus), (2) Severe sesamoid arthritis on radiograph and axial view, (3) Large sesamoid osteophytes blocking joint preparation. Lateral sesamoid more critical to preserve than medial (provides lateral stability).

Surface Preparation Techniques

Critical step - determines union rate and final position.

Planar Resection (Most Common)

Advantages: Simple, reproducible, maximum bone contact, easier position adjustment

Disadvantages: Shortens toe (limit to under 5mm), requires precise angle cuts

Flat-Cut Steps

Step 1Metatarsal Head Resection

Remove minimal bone - just enough to expose healthy bleeding bone. Typically 2-3mm from articular surface.

Cut perpendicular to metatarsal axis using sagittal saw. Create flat surface. Remove any remaining cartilage with curette or burr.

Check for bleeding: Multiple punctate bleeding points indicate viable bone. If sclerotic, resect deeper until bleeding occurs.

Step 2Phalangeal Base Resection

Match metatarsal cut - create complementary flat surface on phalangeal base. Remove 2-3mm.

Orientation: Slight valgus bias (cut perpendicular to phalangeal axis produces valgus when hallux positioned).

Confirm congruency: Place surfaces together - should have over 80% contact. Burr high spots.

Step 3Fishmouth Technique

Optional enhancement: Create shallow concavity in metatarsal head, matching convexity in phalanx base.

Increases contact area and rotational stability. Use burr to shape. Avoid deep cuts (weakens bone).

How Much to Resect?

Total resection should be under 5mm (combined metatarsal and phalanx). Each 1mm of shortening increases lesser metatarsal load by approximately 10%. Over 5mm shortening causes symptomatic transfer metatarsalgia in 40-50% of patients. If significant deformity correction needed, accept some shortening but counsel patient about transfer metatarsalgia risk.

Reaming Technique

Advantages: Maximizes bone contact, inherently stable, less shortening

Disadvantages: Specialized reamers needed, difficult to adjust position, learning curve

Cup-and-Cone Steps

Step 1Cone Preparation (Metatarsal)

Conical reamer shaped to match head diameter. Center over metatarsal head. Ream to depth of 5-8mm.

Creates cone-shaped concavity in metatarsal head. Preserve plantar cortex for structural support.

Step 2Cup Preparation (Phalanx)

Cup reamer (convex surface). Ream phalangeal base to create matching concavity.

Trial reduction: Cone should fully seat in cup with stable fit. Adjust with burr if needed.

Step 3Position Adjustment

Limited adjustability compared to flat-cut. Achieve desired valgus and rotation by phalangeal reaming direction.

Dorsiflexion: Difficult to change once reamed. Select initial reaming trajectory carefully.

When to use cup-and-cone: Minimal deformity correction needed, Want maximum surface contact, Concerned about nonunion (smoker, diabetic), Prefer inherent stability.

Avoid if: Severe deformity (difficult to achieve position), Bone loss or cysts (need structural bone graft), Inexperienced with technique.

Final Preparation

Surface Optimization

  • Bleeding bone: Multiple punctate bleeding indicates viability
  • Remove sclerotic bone: Burr or curette until bleeding
  • Fenestration: Small drill holes increase vascularity
  • Avoid soft tissue interposition: Clear debris from surfaces

Bone Graft Preparation

  • Autograft from metatarsal/phalanx: Bone removed during preparation
  • Structural graft if needed: Large cyst, significant bone loss
  • Cancellous chips: Pack into defects for union enhancement
  • Biologics: Consider if high-risk nonunion (off-label)

Achieving Optimal Position

This is the most critical step - determines functional outcome.

Positioning Sequence

Step 1Provisional Position

Simulate weightbearing: Assistant holds ankle at 90°, apply pressure to plantar forefoot to simulate stance phase.

Hallux position check:

  • Toenail faces ceiling (neutral rotation)
  • 10-15° valgus relative to first metatarsal axis
  • 5-15° dorsiflexion relative to floor (hallux just clears table at simulated toe-off)

Hold with pointed reduction forceps across MTP joint.

Step 2Temporary Fixation

Insert K-wires to maintain position during definitive fixation.

Technique: Two 1.6mm K-wires from phalanx into metatarsal head, avoiding future screw trajectory. Cross wires for rotational control.

Confirm position on fluoroscopy: AP, lateral, oblique views. Assess valgus, dorsiflexion, rotation.

Step 3Position Adjustment if Needed

Too much dorsiflexion (over 20°): Remove K-wires, plantarflex hallux, re-pin

Too little dorsiflexion (under 5°): Check for sesamoid impingement, consider sesamoid excision

Varus or valgus malalignment: Adjust rotation and frontal plane position

IP joint hyperextension test: If IP joint hyperextends over 30° with MTP fused, excessive MTP dorsiflexion likely.

Fixation Technique

Dorsal plate with interfragmentary lag screw provides highest biomechanical stability.

Fixation Steps

Step 1Lag Screw Placement

Drill 3.2mm hole from dorsal distal phalanx into metatarsal head, perpendicular to fusion plane. Thread should engage metatarsal only.

Overdrill near cortex with 4.0mm bit to create lag effect. Insert 4.0mm fully threaded cortical screw.

Compress fusion site: Tighten screw while maintaining position with forceps. Confirms good bone apposition.

Step 2Plate Application

Select appropriate length plate - typically 5-7 hole (30-40mm). Low-profile locking plate preferred.

Position plate: Centered over dorsal MTP joint. Plate should NOT extend proximal to metatarsal neck (limits plantar flexion if too proximal).

Screw insertion sequence:

  1. Proximal metatarsal screw (non-locking) - compress plate
  2. Distal phalanx screw (non-locking) - compress plate
  3. Remaining screws (locking) - bicortical when possible
  4. Minimum 3 screws in each bone segment
Step 3Final Position Check

Fluoroscopy: AP, lateral, oblique views

  • Screws bicortical, no joint penetration
  • Valgus 10-15° on AP
  • Dorsiflexion 5-15° relative to floor on lateral
  • No rotation (toenail straight up on AP)

Clinical check:

  • Simulate stance phase - hallux clears floor
  • No IP hyperextension (suggests excessive MTP dorsiflexion)
  • Stable to stress testing

Common Fixation Mistakes

Avoid these errors: (1) Plantar plate placement - causes painful prominence, risk of wound breakdown. (2) Crossed screws only - 30% nonunion rate vs 5-10% with plate. (3) Insufficient screw purchase - unicortical screws pull out. (4) Plate too proximal - limits flexor tendon excursion. (5) Excessive compression - fractures osteoporotic bone.

Alternative Fixation Methods

TechniqueBiomechanical StrengthNonunion RateIndications
Dorsal plate + lag screwHighest (500-600N failure load)5-10%Standard, preferred method
Crossed lag screwsModerate (300-400N)15-30%Osteoporotic bone, plate intolerance
Staple fixationLow (200-300N)20-40%Rarely used today
Memory compression staplesModerate (350-450N)10-15%Minimal hardware profile needed

Wound Closure and Dressing

Closure Steps

Step 1Joint Capsule

Close capsule over plate if possible. Use 2-0 absorbable suture.

Purpose: Provides soft tissue coverage of hardware, reduces prominence.

If unable to close: Acceptable - subcutaneous tissue will cover plate.

Step 2Subcutaneous Layer

3-0 absorbable suture. Close deep dermis to eliminate dead space and reduce tension on skin.

Avoid excessive tension - risk of wound dehiscence if overtightened.

Step 3Skin Closure

Options: 4-0 nylon interrupted, 4-0 monocryl subcuticular, staples (faster)

Avoid tension: Skin should approximate easily. If tight, trim more skin or adjust subcutaneous closure.

Step 4Dressing and Splinting

Bulky dressing: Gauze and cotton padding to control swelling

Posterior splint: From toes to below knee, ankle at 90°, hallux in neutral position. Maintains position and protects fusion.

Duration: Splint for 2 weeks until sutures removed, then transition to walking boot.

Drain use: Generally NOT needed. Consider if extensive soft tissue dissection or bleeding concerns.

This approach ensures proper technique throughout the surgical procedure while maintaining comprehensive detail.

Technical Pearls and Pitfalls

Do's (Pearls)

  • Test position before and during fixation: Simulate weightbearing repeatedly
  • Preserve lateral sesamoid if possible: More important for stability than medial
  • Use lag screw before plate: Compresses fusion site optimally
  • Bicortical screws: Maximize pullout strength in osteoporotic bone
  • Limit total resection to under 5mm: Prevents transfer metatarsalgia

Don'ts (Pitfalls)

  • Don't fuse in excessive dorsiflexion: Over 20° causes transfer metatarsalgia
  • Don't use plantar plate: Wound breakdown and prominence risk
  • Don't rely on crossed screws alone: Higher nonunion rate
  • Don't forget IP joint compensation: Check for IP hyperextension
  • Don't overtighten in osteoporotic bone: Fracture risk

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Nonunion5-10%Smoking, diabetes, inadequate fixation, infectionRevision fusion with bone graft and rigid fixation
Malposition5-15%Inadequate intra-op position check, loss of fixationRevision if symptomatic (transfer metatarsalgia, shoe wear issues)
Transfer metatarsalgia10-20%Excessive dorsiflexion, over 5mm shortening, sesamoid excisionOrthotic offloading, consider lesser metatarsal osteotomy
Infection (superficial)1-3%Diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, smokingAntibiotics, local wound care, debridement if needed
Infection (deep)Under 1%Immunosuppression, prolonged surgery, hematomaHardware removal, debridement, antibiotics, possible staged revision
Nerve injury (sensory)5-10%Medial or dorsal approach, aggressive retractionObservation (most improve), neuroma excision if painful
Hardware prominence5-10%Thin soft tissues, dorsal plate, patient thin habitusObservation if asymptomatic, removal after union (12+ months)
IP joint arthritis5-15% long-termIncreased demand on IP joint, pre-existing changesActivity modification, IP fusion if severe (rare)

Nonunion Management

Diagnosis: Persistent pain, motion at fusion site, lucency on radiograph at 3+ months. Treatment requires revision surgery - debride nonunion site to bleeding bone, add autograft or allograft, rigid fixation with plate. Success rate of revision 85-90%. Consider bone stimulator as adjunct in high-risk patients (smokers, diabetics) but NOT as primary treatment.

Transfer Metatarsalgia Prevention

The two main preventable causes are malposition and excessive shortening. Prevention strategies: (1) Intra-operative position testing with simulated weightbearing, (2) Limit total bone resection to under 5mm, (3) Preserve sesamoids when possible, (4) Consider prophylactic lesser metatarsal osteotomy if first metatarsal already short, (5) Patient education pre-operatively about adaptive footwear. If it occurs: Orthotic with first ray cutout and metatarsal pad first-line. Persistent symptoms may need lesser metatarsal Weil osteotomy.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Timeline

Immediate PeriodPost-op Days 0-14

Protected weightbearing: Heel-touch only or non-weightbearing depending on bone quality and fixation stability

Immobilization: Posterior splint, foot elevated above heart level

DVT prophylaxis: Chemical (enoxaparin 40mg daily) and mechanical (foot pumps)

Pain management: Multimodal (acetaminophen, NSAIDs after 6 weeks, opioids limited)

Wound care: Keep splint dry and clean, no bathing (shower with leg out)

Early HealingWeeks 2-6

Suture removal at 2 weeks, transition to removable walking boot

Weightbearing: Advance to full weightbearing in boot as tolerated (usually by week 4)

Radiographs: At 2 weeks (baseline), 6 weeks (assess early healing)

DVT prophylaxis: Continue until fully mobile

Exercises: Ankle ROM, quad sets, no hallux motion

Progressive LoadingWeeks 6-12

Clinical union assessment: No tenderness at fusion site, stable to stress

Radiographic union: Bridging callus on at least 3 cortices

Transition to stiff-soled shoe with wide toe box at 8-10 weeks if uniting well

Activity: Walking for exercise, stationary bike, swimming (avoid push-off)

Return to work: Sedentary at 2-4 weeks, standing at 6-8 weeks, manual labor at 10-12 weeks

Final Healing3 Months and Beyond

Full union expected: Radiographs show solid bridging callus, no lucency

Unrestricted weightbearing: Full activities permitted when united

Return to impact sports: 4-6 months, when fully united and strength restored

Footwear modifications: Rocker-bottom sole helpful, avoid high heels, tight toe boxes

Hardware removal: Consider if prominent after 12+ months of solid union

Modified Protocol for Nonunion Risk

Risk factors: Smoking, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, revision surgery

Extended Protection

  • Non-weightbearing: Extended to 6 weeks (vs 2-4 weeks standard)
  • Immobilization: 8-10 weeks in boot (vs 6-8 weeks)
  • Radiographic monitoring: Every 4 weeks until union confirmed
  • Consider bone stimulator: Pulsed electromagnetic field or capacitive coupling

Optimization Measures

  • Smoking cessation: Mandatory 4 weeks pre-op and 12 weeks post-op
  • Glycemic control: HbA1c under 7% target for diabetics
  • Nutritional support: Vitamin D, calcium supplementation
  • Infection prevention: Extended antibiotics if PVD (24-48h post-op)

Delayed Union vs Nonunion

Delayed union: Healing slower than expected but progressing. Radiographs show some callus formation. Management: Continue protected weightbearing, consider bone stimulator, re-assess at 4-6 months. Nonunion: No progression of healing after 6 months, persistent lucency, motion at fusion site. Management: Requires surgical revision with bone graft and rigid fixation.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes

Outcome MeasurePre-operativePost-operative (12 months)Clinical Significance
AOFAS Hallux Score45-55 (poor)85-95 (excellent)40-point improvement typical
VAS Pain Score7-8 out of 101-2 out of 10Dramatic pain relief in 95%
Patient SatisfactionN/A85-90% very satisfiedWould undergo surgery again
Return to SportsUnable70-80% return to activitiesLow-impact better than high-impact

Predictors of Outcome

Good Outcome Predictors

  • Appropriate patient selection: End-stage disease, failed conservative treatment
  • Optimal fusion position: 5-15° dorsiflexion, 10-15° valgus
  • Rigid fixation: Plate and screw construct
  • Adequate bone preparation: Bleeding subchondral bone
  • Patient compliance: Protected weightbearing protocol

Poor Outcome Predictors

  • Malposition: Too much or too little dorsiflexion
  • Excessive shortening: Over 5mm bone resection
  • Nonunion: Especially if painful
  • Active smoking: Doubles nonunion risk
  • Unrealistic expectations: Expecting normal foot function

Long-Term Durability

First MTP arthrodesis has excellent long-term results: 20-year survivorship over 90% (fusion remains solid and pain-free). Compare to first MTP arthroplasty: 10-year survivorship 60-80%, with revision rates 10-20%. Patient counseling point: Arthrodesis is a one-time procedure with predictable, durable results. Arthroplasty offers motion but may require revision surgery within 10-15 years.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

DeFrino et al: First MTP Arthrodesis Fixation Comparison

3
DeFrino PF, Brodsky JW, Pollo FE, et al • Foot Ankle Int (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Biomechanical study comparing 6 fixation methods
  • Dorsal plate + lag screw: highest failure load (560N)
  • Crossed lag screws: 320N failure load (43% weaker)
  • Staple fixation: lowest strength (210N)
  • Clinical correlation: plate fixation had lowest nonunion rate (8% vs 18%)
Clinical Implication: Dorsal plate with interfragmentary lag screw is biomechanically superior and should be preferred fixation method for first MTP arthrodesis.
Limitation: Cadaveric study may not reflect clinical loading conditions; no long-term clinical outcomes.

Coughlin and Shurnas: Hallux Rigidus Grading and Treatment

4
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 110 feet with hallux rigidus
  • Established 5-grade classification system (0-4)
  • Cheilectomy: 90% success for grades 1-2, 30% for grade 3
  • Arthrodesis: 97% union rate, 90% satisfaction for grade 3-4
  • Grade 4 (IP arthritis): arthrodesis mandatory
Clinical Implication: Coughlin-Shurnas classification guides treatment selection. Arthrodesis is treatment of choice for grades 3-4 hallux rigidus.
Limitation: Retrospective study with heterogeneous patient population and surgeon techniques.

Goucher and Coughlin: Hallux MTP Arthrodesis Fusion Position

4
Goucher NR, Coughlin MJ • Foot Ankle Int (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Review of 58 first MTP arthrodeses with minimum 2-year follow-up
  • Optimal dorsiflexion: 10-15° relative to floor (not metatarsal)
  • Excessive dorsiflexion (over 20°): 50% transfer metatarsalgia
  • Insufficient dorsiflexion (under 5°): impaired push-off, abnormal gait
  • Valgus 10-15°: matched contralateral side, best cosmesis
Clinical Implication: Position relative to weightbearing surface is critical. 10-15° dorsiflexion, 10-15° valgus provides optimal functional outcome.
Limitation: Retrospective review with subjective position assessment; no gait analysis data.

Roukis: Nonunion After First MTP Arthrodesis

4
Roukis TS • J Foot Ankle Surg (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 35 studies, 2,312 arthrodeses
  • Overall nonunion rate: 7.9% (range 0-30%)
  • Plate fixation: 5.3% nonunion rate
  • Crossed screws: 15.4% nonunion rate
  • Smoking increased nonunion risk 3-fold
  • Revision fusion success rate: 85%
Clinical Implication: Plate fixation significantly reduces nonunion risk compared to screw-only constructs. Smoking cessation critical for union.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies with variable follow-up and outcome measures; publication bias likely.

Gibson and Thomson: Arthrodesis vs Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus

2
Gibson JN, Thomson CE • Foot Ankle Int (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review comparing arthrodesis and arthroplasty
  • Arthrodesis: 96% union rate, 85% satisfaction, 8% revision rate at 10 years
  • Arthroplasty (implant): 78% survival at 10 years, 18% revision rate
  • Arthroplasty (excisional): 30% transfer metatarsalgia, poor functional outcomes
  • Arthrodesis preferred for young, active patients and grades 3-4
Clinical Implication: Arthrodesis provides more predictable pain relief and durability than arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus.
Limitation: Systematic review limited by heterogeneous studies; newer implants may have better outcomes than historical data.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classification and Treatment Selection

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old active male presents with progressive first MTP pain over 2 years. Pain worse with activity, difficulty with golf. Examination shows 15° dorsiflexion (contralateral 70°), dorsal osteophytes, and positive grind test. Radiographs show large dorsal osteophyte, 60% joint space narrowing, and subchondral sclerosis. IP joint appears normal. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Coughlin-Shurnas Grade 3 hallux rigidus based on severe dorsiflexion restriction (under 20°), greater than 50% joint space narrowing, and large osteophytes on radiograph. I would take a systematic approach: First, confirm the diagnosis with history of progressive pain worse with activity and examination findings of limited painful dorsiflexion. Second, rule out inflammatory arthropathy with basic labs if indicated. Third, assess for IP joint compensation capacity since it will bear increased demand after any MTP procedure. My treatment recommendation is first MTP arthrodesis given: (1) Grade 3 disease beyond cheilectomy indication, (2) Active 58-year-old male wants predictable return to golf, (3) Arthrodesis provides 90-95% union rate and 85-90% satisfaction, (4) More durable than arthroplasty. I would counsel about: (1) Loss of MTP motion but IP joint compensates, (2) Optimal position critical (5-15° dorsiflexion, 10-15° valgus), (3) 6-8 weeks protected weightbearing, (4) Return to golf at 4-6 months, (5) Complications including nonunion (5-10%), transfer metatarsalgia (10-20%), and hardware prominence (5-10%).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Accurate Coughlin-Shurnas classification (Grade 3)
Systematic assessment including IP joint examination
Clear rationale for arthrodesis over arthroplasty
Detailed counseling on position, rehabilitation, and complications
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering arthroplasty without discussing durability concerns
✗Not examining IP joint for compensatory capacity
✗Suggesting cheilectomy for Grade 3 disease (inappropriate)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if this patient had Grade 4 disease with IP arthritis?"
"How would your recommendation change for a 75-year-old sedentary patient?"
"What are the key differences between arthrodesis and hemiarthroplasty outcomes?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Technique and Position

EXAMINER

"You are performing a first MTP arthrodesis for Grade 3 hallux rigidus. Walk me through your optimal fusion position, how you achieve it, and your fixation method. What is your target dorsiflexion angle and why?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For first MTP arthrodesis, position is the most critical determinant of outcome. My target position is: (1) 5-15° dorsiflexion relative to the weightbearing surface - NOT the metatarsal axis, (2) 10-15° valgus to match the contralateral side, (3) Neutral rotation with toenail facing ceiling. The key is that patients walk on the ground, not their metatarsal axis, so ground-relative position matters. I achieve this through: First, patient positioning supine with hip bump for internal rotation. Second, dorsomedial surgical approach exposing the MTP joint. Third, joint preparation with flat-cut technique removing 2-3mm from each surface (total under 5mm to prevent excessive shortening and transfer metatarsalgia). Fourth, position testing by simulating weightbearing - I have my assistant hold the ankle at 90° and apply pressure to the plantar forefoot while I position the hallux so it just clears the table at simulated toe-off. Fifth, provisional fixation with K-wires and fluoroscopic confirmation in AP, lateral, and oblique views. Sixth, definitive fixation with interfragmentary lag screw for compression followed by dorsal locking plate with minimum 3 screws in each segment. This provides highest biomechanical stability (560N failure load vs 320N for crossed screws). I avoid plantar plate placement due to wound breakdown risk and prominence.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Emphasis on position relative to ground, not metatarsal
Specific dorsiflexion range (5-15°) with rationale
Detailed position testing technique with weightbearing simulation
Biomechanically superior fixation method (plate + lag screw)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Stating dorsiflexion relative to metatarsal axis (incorrect reference)
✗Not mentioning the under 5mm shortening rule
✗Using crossed screws alone (higher nonunion rate)
✗Forgetting to simulate weightbearing for position testing
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if you cannot achieve good position due to sesamoid impingement?"
"How do you know if you have excessive dorsiflexion intra-operatively?"
"What are the biomechanical advantages of the dorsal plate over crossed screws?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication Management

EXAMINER

"A 62-year-old patient underwent first MTP arthrodesis 4 months ago. She returns with persistent medial forefoot pain, particularly during push-off. Examination shows a well-healed incision, the fusion site is non-tender and stable, but she has significant tenderness under the second and third metatarsal heads. Weightbearing radiographs show solid fusion but the hallux appears very dorsiflexed. How do you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for transfer metatarsalgia secondary to malposition with excessive dorsiflexion of the first MTP arthrodesis. My immediate assessment includes: First, quantify the dorsiflexion angle on lateral weightbearing radiograph - excessive is over 20° relative to the ground. Second, examine the lesser metatarsals for plantar calluses indicating overload. Third, assess the IP joint for hyperextension suggesting the hallux is too dorsiflexed (if IP hyperextends over 30° the MTP is likely excessively dorsiflexed). Fourth, rule out other causes of metatarsalgia (stress fracture, neuroma, plantar plate tear) with palpation and imaging if needed. The differential includes: (1) Transfer metatarsalgia from first ray unloading (most likely), (2) Excessive shortening during fusion (over 5mm), (3) Sesamoid excision if performed (reduces first ray loading). Treatment depends on severity and patient functional demands. Initial management: (1) Conservative with orthotic featuring first ray cutout and metatarsal pad to redistribute load, (2) Stiff-soled rocker-bottom shoe to reduce forefoot pressure, (3) NSAIDs and activity modification. If conservative treatment fails after 3-6 months: (1) Consider revision arthrodesis to correct position if fusion is solid (technically challenging), (2) Lesser metatarsal Weil osteotomies to shorten second and third metatarsals and reduce pressure (more commonly performed), (3) Combination approach if severe. I would counsel the patient that: (1) This is a recognized complication occurring in 10-20% of cases, (2) Conservative treatment successful in about half of patients, (3) Surgical options available if conservative measures fail, (4) Prevention strategies for contralateral foot if needed in future.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic diagnosis of transfer metatarsalgia etiology
Quantification of malposition with radiographic measurement
Stepwise management from conservative to surgical
Realistic expectations for treatment outcomes
COMMON TRAPS
✗Immediately recommending revision surgery without conservative trial
✗Missing excessive shortening as a contributing factor
✗Not examining IP joint for hyperextension clue
✗Failing to rule out other causes of forefoot pain
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What radiographic measurements would confirm excessive dorsiflexion?"
"How would you technically perform a revision arthrodesis for malposition?"
"What are the risks of Weil osteotomy for transfer metatarsalgia?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: The sesamoid bones in the first MTP joint serve what primary biomechanical function? A: Increase the mechanical advantage of the flexor hallucis brevis by displacing the tendon plantarward, creating a greater moment arm for plantarflexion. Sesamoid excision reduces hallux plantarflexion strength by approximately 50% and increases load transfer to lesser metatarsals.

Classification Question

Q: What is the key distinguishing feature between Coughlin-Shurnas Grade 3 and Grade 4 hallux rigidus? A: Grade 4 includes IP joint arthritis in addition to severe MTP joint disease. This is critical because IP joint arthritis is an absolute contraindication to first MTP arthroplasty (the IP joint must compensate with increased motion after arthroplasty, which is impossible if arthritic). Grade 4 disease mandates arthrodesis.

Position Question

Q: What is the optimal dorsiflexion angle for first MTP arthrodesis and relative to what reference point? A: 5-15° dorsiflexion relative to the weightbearing surface (ground), NOT relative to the first metatarsal axis. This is tested intra-operatively by simulating stance phase with the ankle at 90° and confirming the hallux just clears the floor during simulated toe-off. Excessive dorsiflexion (over 20°) causes transfer metatarsalgia.

Fixation Question

Q: What fixation method provides the highest biomechanical stability for first MTP arthrodesis? A: Dorsal plate with interfragmentary lag screw provides the highest failure load (560N) compared to crossed lag screws (320N) or staple fixation (210N). This correlates with clinical nonunion rates: plate fixation 5-10% vs crossed screws 15-30%. The lag screw provides compression, while the plate provides rigid stabilization.

Complication Question

Q: What is the most common complication after first MTP arthrodesis and how is it prevented? A: Transfer metatarsalgia (10-20% incidence) from malposition or excessive shortening. Prevention strategies: (1) Limit total bone resection to under 5mm, (2) Achieve optimal position (5-15° dorsiflexion, 10-15° valgus), (3) Preserve sesamoids when possible, (4) Intra-operative position testing with simulated weightbearing.

Evidence Question

Q: What is the long-term survivorship of first MTP arthrodesis compared to arthroplasty? A: Arthrodesis: over 90% survivorship at 20 years with fusion remaining solid and pain-free. Arthroplasty: 60-80% survivorship at 10 years with revision rates of 10-20%. This durability advantage makes arthrodesis the preferred option for young, active patients and end-stage disease (grades 3-4).

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Registry Data

  • AOANJRR: Limited foot and ankle registry data (primarily hip/knee)
  • State-based registries: Victoria and NSW track some foot/ankle procedures
  • Arthroplasty data: First MTP arthroplasty has higher revision rate than arthrodesis in small Australian cohorts
  • Infection surveillance: ACSQHC targets under 1% SSI for clean orthopaedic procedures

Australian Guidelines

  • ACSQHC: Antibiotic prophylaxis within 60 minutes pre-incision (cefazolin 2g IV)
  • VTE prophylaxis: Chemical prophylaxis (enoxaparin) for 10-14 days per ANZSVS guidelines
  • eTG: Antibiotic guidelines for prophylaxis and treatment
  • PBS: Subsidy for enoxaparin, rivaroxaban (VTE prophylaxis)

Informed Consent Requirements

  • Material risks: Nonunion (5-10%), transfer metatarsalgia (10-20%), infection (1-3%)
  • Alternative treatments: Arthroplasty, cheilectomy, conservative management
  • Expected outcomes: 90-95% union rate, 85-90% satisfaction
  • Recovery timeline: 6-8 weeks protected weight bearing, 4-6 months return to sports

Medicolegal Considerations

Common litigation areas: (1) Malposition causing transfer metatarsalgia - failure to achieve or maintain optimal position, (2) Nonunion - inadequate fixation or patient non-compliance with protected weightbearing, (3) Nerve injury - sensory loss from medial or dorsal nerve, (4) Informed consent failure - inadequate discussion of loss of motion and shoe wear changes. Documentation requirements: Pre-operative templating notes, intra-operative position testing and fluoroscopy images, post-operative radiographs at 2, 6, 12 weeks showing maintenance of position, complications discussed during consent, smoking cessation counseling documented.

Australian-Specific Considerations

Patient demographics: Higher prevalence of hallux rigidus in older Australians due to aging population. Beach/outdoor lifestyle encourages barefoot walking and sandal use, making rigid toe more noticeable.

Footwear culture: Australians frequently wear thongs (flip-flops) and sandals - patients must be counseled that fused MTP joint prevents effective use of toe-post footwear.

Workers compensation: First MTP arthrodesis covered under WorkCover in most states for traumatic arthritis. RTW timeline typically 12-16 weeks for manual laborers, 4-6 weeks for sedentary workers.

Private vs public: Most first MTP arthrodeses performed in private sector. Public hospital waiting times 6-12 months for category 3 (non-urgent). Category 2 if significant functional impairment (3-6 month target).

FIRST MTP JOINT ARTHRODESIS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Sesamoids = 50% plantarflexion strength, displace FHL tendon plantarward
  • •Medial digital nerve = dorsomedial approach risk, causes medial hallux numbness
  • •Normal MTP dorsiflexion = 65-75°, after fusion IP must compensate with 20-30°
  • •Plantar plate and sesamoid complex = primary plantar stabilizers

Classification (Coughlin-Shurnas)

  • •Grade 0 = Normal ROM, observation
  • •Grade 1 = 30-40° dorsiflexion, minimal osteophytes, cheilectomy 70% success
  • •Grade 2 = 10-30°, moderate changes, cheilectomy or arthroplasty
  • •Grade 3 = Under 10°, severe changes, arthrodesis or arthroplasty
  • •Grade 4 = Grade 3 + IP arthritis, arthrodesis mandatory (arthroplasty contraindicated)

Optimal Position

  • •Dorsiflexion = 5-15° relative to GROUND (not metatarsal axis)
  • •Valgus = 10-15° to match contralateral side
  • •Rotation = Neutral, toenail faces ceiling when supine
  • •Shortening = Limit to under 5mm total resection
  • •Position test = Hallux just clears floor at simulated toe-off in stance

Surgical Pearls

  • •Dorsomedial approach = preferred, protects medial digital nerve
  • •Joint prep = Bleeding subchondral bone essential, flat-cut or cup-and-cone
  • •Fixation = Dorsal plate + lag screw (560N strength vs 320N crossed screws)
  • •Sesamoid preservation = If possible, reduces transfer metatarsalgia risk
  • •Avoid plantar plate = Wound breakdown and prominence risk

Complications

  • •Nonunion = 5-10%, higher with smoking, crossed screws, revision with bone graft
  • •Malposition = 5-15%, most common complication, revision if symptomatic
  • •Transfer metatarsalgia = 10-20%, from excessive dorsiflexion or shortening over 5mm
  • •Infection = 1-3% superficial, under 1% deep
  • •Hardware prominence = 5-10%, remove after union if symptomatic
Quick Stats
Reading Time147 min
Related Topics

Achilles Tendon Rupture

Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Calcaneal Fractures

Charcot Neuroarthropathy