Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Girdlestone Procedure (Excision Arthroplasty)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Girdlestone Procedure (Excision Arthroplasty)

Comprehensive Orthopaedic exam guide to Girdlestone procedure including indications, surgical technique, and outcomes for hip excision arthroplasty

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

GIRDLESTONE PROCEDURE

Excision Arthroplasty | Salvage Procedure | Definitive or Staging

70-80%infection eradication
4-6cmleg length discrepancy
50-60%able to walk (with aids)
6-8 wksminimum antibiotic course

Indications

Definitive
PatternNot a reimplantation candidate
TreatmentPermanent excision
Staging (2-stage)
PatternInfected THA, fit for revision
TreatmentInterim before reimplantation
Native Hip
PatternSevere septic arthritis, TB
TreatmentPrimary excision

Critical Must-Knows

  • Primary indication: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) not suitable for DAIR
  • Named after Gathorne Robert Girdlestone (1881-1950)
  • Results in significant LLD (4-6cm) and functional limitation
  • Can be definitive or interim (2-stage revision)
  • Harris hip score improves with reimplantation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Trendelenburg gait expected post-procedure
  • "
    Hip abductors critical for stability of pseudarthrosis
  • "
    Spacer preferred for interim if reimplantation planned
  • "
    Higher success rate when combined with adequate antibiotics

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Two-panel AP radiograph showing post-Girdlestone excision arthroplasty (left) and pre-operative tubercular hip arthritis (right)
Click to expand
Two-panel AP radiograph showing post-Girdlestone excision arthroplasty (left) and pre-operative tubercular hip arthritis (right)Credit: Saraf SK et al. via Indian J Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY)

Critical Girdlestone Exam Points

Core Indication

Periprosthetic joint infection where DAIR has failed or is contraindicated. Patient must be medically fit for surgery and able to tolerate prolonged antibiotics. Can be definitive (permanent) or interim (before reimplantation).

Functional Outcome

Significant disability expected: 4-6cm limb length discrepancy, Trendelenburg gait, need for walking aids. Pain relief usually achieved. 50-60% ambulatory with aids. Better than ongoing sepsis or repeated failed surgery.

Surgical Goal

Complete removal of infected prosthesis, cement, and devitalized tissue. Aggressive debridement is key to infection eradication. Preserve abductor mechanism when possible for pseudarthrosis stability.

Alternative Options

Antibiotic-loaded articulating spacer preferred for staging if reimplantation planned. Spacer maintains soft tissue tension and improves functional outcome during treatment. Static spacer or excision for definitive cases.

Quick Decision Guide

Clinical ScenarioFitness for RevisionMicroorganismRecommendation
Infected THA, medically fitYesSensitive, identifiable2-stage with spacer preferred
Infected THA, multiple surgeriesLimitedResistant/fungalGirdlestone (possibly definitive)
Failed 2-stage, ongoing infectionExhausted optionsAnyDefinitive Girdlestone
Medical comorbidities prohibit revisionNoAnyDefinitive Girdlestone + suppression
Mnemonic

RESCUEIndications for Girdlestone

R
Resistant organism
MDR pathogens or fungi
E
Exhausted surgical options
Multiple failed revisions
S
Sepsis ongoing
Persistent infection despite treatment
C
Comorbidities preclude revision
Not medically fit
U
Unable to comply with antibiotic regimen
Non-compliance risk
E
Extreme bone loss
Insufficient acetabular/femoral stock

Memory Hook:When patient needs RESCUE from failed hip, consider Girdlestone!

Mnemonic

RECLAIMKey Steps

R
Remove prosthesis
All components including cement
E
Excise infected tissue
Aggressive debridement
C
Collect samples
Multiple tissue samples for microbiology
L
Lavage thoroughly
Copious irrigation (9L)
A
Abductors preserve
Maintain hip stability
I
IV antibiotics
Prolonged course (6-12 weeks)
M
Mobilize cautiously
Protected weight bearing

Memory Hook:RECLAIM the hip from infection!

Mnemonic

SPACEGirdlestone vs Spacer

S
Soft tissue tension
Spacer maintains, Girdlestone loses
P
Planning for reimplantation
Spacer if revision likely
A
Ambulatory status
Better function with spacer
C
Cost consideration
Spacer adds cost, Girdlestone simpler
E
Eradication goal
Both effective if adequate debridement

Memory Hook:Use SPACE (spacer) if reimplantation planned!

Overview and Epidemiology

The Girdlestone procedure (excision arthroplasty) involves resection of the femoral head and neck without replacement. Originally described by Gathorne Robert Girdlestone for tuberculosis of the hip, it is now primarily used as a salvage procedure for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) when other options have failed or are contraindicated.

Historical Context

G.R. Girdlestone (1881-1950) described excision arthroplasty in 1943 for tuberculosis of the hip. Pre-antibiotic era, it was the primary treatment for septic hip. Now reserved for salvage of infected arthroplasty or when patient is not a candidate for replacement.

Current Applications

  • PJI: Failed DAIR or 2-stage
  • Recurrent deep infection
  • Not fit for revision surgery
  • Resistant/difficult organisms
  • Severe bone loss precluding reimplantation

Rare Indications

  • Native hip septic arthritis (failed treatment)
  • Tuberculosis (historical, rare now)
  • Severe avascular necrosis (not suitable for THR)
  • Certain malignancies (palliation)

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Key Anatomical Considerations

The abductor mechanism (gluteus medius/minimus inserting on greater trochanter) must be preserved for pseudarthrosis stability. Excessive bone resection results in proximal migration and worse function. The sciatic nerve is at risk and must be protected during posterior dissection.

Structures to Preserve vs Remove

StructurePreserve/RemoveRationale
Greater trochanter (if viable)PRESERVEAbductor attachment crucial for stability
Femoral head/neckREMOVESource of infection, resect to healthy bone
All implants and cementREMOVEBiofilm eradication requires complete removal
Abductor complexPRESERVETrendelenburg gait worsens if lost
Hip capsule remnantsVARIABLEMay help contain pseudarthrosis

Biomechanics of Pseudarthrosis

After Girdlestone, a fibrous pseudarthrosis develops. The proximal femur migrates superiorly until it articulates with the ischium/ilium. Abductor function determines stability - if preserved, patient may achieve limited ambulation. LLD of 4-6cm is typical.

Post-Resection Anatomy

  • Proximal femoral stump
  • Fibrous pseudarthrosis
  • Proximal migration (4-6cm)
  • Acetabulum becomes defunctioned
  • Weight bearing through ischium

Functional Implications

  • Positive Trendelenburg sign
  • Marked limp
  • Need for walking aids (cane or walker)
  • Sitting tolerance usually preserved
  • Severe restriction of activity

Classification Systems

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Classification

TypeTimingTypical OrganismManagement
Acute postoperativeLess than 4 weeks post-opS. aureus, gram-negativesDAIR often successful
Late chronicGreater than 4 weeks, less than 12 monthsS. epidermidis, low virulenceDAIR may work, often 2-stage
Acute hematogenousAny time, acute onsetS. aureus, streptococcusDAIR if less than 3 weeks symptoms
Chronic (greater than 12 months)Established infectionAny organism2-stage or Girdlestone

DAIR vs Excision

DAIR success factors: Acute infection (less than 4 weeks), sensitive organism, well-fixed prosthesis, healthy host. Girdlestone indications: Failed DAIR, chronic infection, resistant organisms, poor host status.

Classification helps predict treatment success and guides surgical planning.

Girdlestone Procedure Classification

TypeIntentTypical PatientOutcome Goal
Interim (2-stage)Temporary before reimplantationFit patient, good bone stockInfection control, then revise
DefinitivePermanent solutionUnfit for revision, failed 2-stagePain relief, infection control
With spacerMaintains soft tissue tensionPlanned reimplantationBetter interim function
Without spacerMaximum debridementDefinitive or complex infectionFocus on eradication

Understanding the classification helps determine approach and counsel patients appropriately.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Presenting symptoms: Pain, swelling, sinus drainage
  • Timeline: Acute vs chronic symptoms
  • Previous surgeries: Number of revisions, organisms
  • Antibiotic history: Previous treatments, allergies
  • Comorbidities: Diabetes, immunosuppression

Physical Examination

  • Wound inspection: Sinus tract, drainage, erythema
  • Joint assessment: Warmth, effusion, ROM
  • Neurovascular: Sciatic nerve function
  • Limb length: Current discrepancy
  • Gait: Ambulatory status

Clinical Indicators of PJI

FindingSignificanceAction Required
Sinus tract communicating with prosthesisDefinitive for PJINo further testing needed for diagnosis
Persistent wound drainage greater than 4 weeksHighly suspiciousAspiration and imaging
Pain with previously well-functioning jointSuggestiveFull workup needed
Elevated inflammatory markers (CRP/ESR)Supportive evidenceCorrelate with clinical picture

Sinus Tract = PJI

A sinus tract communicating with the prosthesis is pathognomonic for periprosthetic joint infection. No further diagnostic tests are required - proceed directly to treatment planning.

Investigations

Diagnostic Workup

First LineLaboratory

Inflammatory markers: CRP (most sensitive), ESR. Serial values help monitor treatment response. WCC often normal in chronic infection.

Second LineAspiration

Synovial fluid analysis: WCC (greater than 3000/μL), PMN% (greater than 80%), culture (hold 14 days). Alpha-defensin if available.

Third LineImaging

Radiographs: Component loosening, periosteal reaction. CT: Bone loss assessment, cement location. Nuclear medicine: If diagnosis uncertain.

MSIS Criteria for PJI Diagnosis

CategoryCriteriaInterpretation
Major (1 = positive)Sinus tract OR 2+ cultures same organismDefinitive diagnosis
Minor (3+ = positive)Elevated ESR/CRPSupportive evidence
MinorElevated synovial WCC (greater than 3000)Supportive evidence
MinorElevated synovial PMN% (greater than 80%)Supportive evidence
MinorPositive histology (greater than 5 PMN/HPF)Supportive evidence
MinorPositive single cultureSupportive evidence

Culture Protocol

Extended culture (14 days) improves detection of slow-growing organisms like Propionibacterium acnes. Take samples BEFORE antibiotics. Minimum 5 tissue samples from different locations for optimal sensitivity.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
girdlestone procedure management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for girdlestone procedureCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Confirm PJI Diagnosis

  • Apply MSIS criteria
  • Identify organism if possible

Step 2: Assess Patient Factors

  • Medical fitness for surgery
  • Bone stock quality
  • Social support and compliance
  • Functional expectations

Step 3: Treatment Selection

Clinical ScenarioRecommended TreatmentRationale
Acute PJI, fit patient, sensitive organismDAIR firstHigh success rate, preserves function
Failed DAIR, fit patient, reconstructable2-stage with spacerGood outcomes, aims for reimplantation
Failed 2-stage OR unfit for revisionGirdlestone (definitive)Prioritizes infection control
Unfit for any surgeryChronic suppressionPalliative approach

Spacer vs No Spacer

Articulating spacer if reimplantation planned - maintains soft tissue tension, improves interim function. No spacer (Girdlestone) for definitive cases or when spacer stability is not achievable.

Multidisciplinary discussion with ID, microbiology, and patient is essential.

Indications and Contraindications

When to Consider Girdlestone

IndicationContextType
Failed DAIR for PJIEarly infection, debridement insufficientStaging or definitive
Failed 2-stage revisionRecurrent infection despite reimplantationDefinitive
Resistant/difficult organismsFungal, MDR bacteriaDefinitive or long-term antibiotic
Medical comorbiditiesHigh surgical risk, poor functional reserveDefinitive
Severe bone lossInsufficient stock for reconstructionDefinitive
Non-compliant patientUnable to complete antibiotic courseDefinitive with suppression

DAIR Failure Criteria

DAIR (Debridement, Antibiotics, Implant Retention) failure is an indication. Failure criteria include: persistent positive cultures, sinus tract persistence, ongoing clinical infection, or CRP/ESR non-normalization despite adequate course.

Patient selection is critical - discuss functional expectations thoroughly.

When to Consider Alternatives

SituationWhy Not GirdlestoneAlternative
Fit patient with good bone stockUnacceptable functional outcome2-stage revision
Sensitive organism, early infectionDAIR may succeedDAIR first
Severe sepsis requiring source controlMay still need immediate resectionGirdlestone may be indicated
Uncontrolled diabetes, malnutritionWound healing concernsOptimize first, then decide

Relative Contraindications

No absolute contraindication to Girdlestone per se - it is often the "last resort." Relative considerations: Patient unwilling to accept disability, medically unstable for any surgery. Sometimes palliative suppression is the only option for severely ill patients.

Always consider the patient's overall goals and expectations before deciding.

Preoperative Planning

Preoperative Workup

Step 1Infection Confirmation

Confirm diagnosis: Aspiration with culture (extend hold time for slow-growing organisms), inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), imaging (XR, CT for bone loss). Apply MSIS criteria for PJI diagnosis.

Step 2Organism Identification

ID the pathogen: Determines antibiotic selection and duration. Consider resistant organisms, fungi, or mycobacteria in refractory cases. Liaise with microbiology/ID early.

Step 3Medical Optimization

Optimize patient: Nutrition (albumin greater than 3g/dL, total lymphocyte count), glycemic control (HbA1c under 8%), smoking cessation. Address cardiac, renal comorbidities.

Step 4Surgical Planning

Plan approach: Review previous incisions. Assess bone loss on imaging. Discuss with patient: realistic functional expectations, need for aids, LLD. Consider if spacer or definitive.

MSIS Criteria for PJI

Major criteria (1 = positive): Sinus communicating with prosthesis, OR same organism on 2 separate cultures. Minor criteria (3+ = positive): Elevated ESR/CRP, elevated synovial WCC, elevated synovial PMN%, positive histology, positive single culture. Be familiar with these criteria for diagnosis.

Laboratory Workup

  • CRP and ESR: Baseline, follow response
  • Synovial fluid: WCC, differential, culture
  • Blood cultures: If systemic symptoms
  • Albumin/prealbumin: Nutrition status
  • HbA1c: Glycemic control

Imaging Workup

  • XR: Component loosening, bone loss
  • CT: Bone defects, cement location
  • MRI: Soft tissue collection (rare)
  • Nuclear medicine: If diagnosis uncertain

Surgical Technique

Setup and Approach

Positioning Steps

Step 1Anesthesia

General or regional anesthesia. Prepare for potentially lengthy procedure. Adequate IV access and invasive monitoring if indicated. Administer antibiotics AFTER intraoperative cultures taken.

Step 2Position

Lateral decubitus position is most common. Allows access to acetabulum and femur. Alternative: supine on fracture table if combined procedure. Secure pelvis with supports.

Step 3Preparation

Standard prep and drape. Expose entire limb for length assessment. Mark previous incisions. Plan extensile approach if needed for cement removal.

Antibiotic Timing

Do not give antibiotics until intraoperative cultures taken. Collect minimum 5 tissue samples from different areas (synovium, capsule, bone-implant interface). Send for aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal cultures. Extended culture (14 days) for slow-growing organisms.

Prepare for extensile approach if cemented prosthesis with aggressive cement removal needed.

Approach and Exposure

Surgical Steps

Step 1Incision

Use previous incision if suitable - avoids skin bridge necrosis. Posterior approach most common. Anterolateral if previous or abductor preservation critical. Extend as needed for access.

Step 2Deep Dissection

Develop tissue planes to hip capsule. Identify and protect sciatic nerve (posterior approach). Excise sinus tracts completely. Release hip capsule circumferentially.

Step 3Collect Samples

Before debridement: Collect 5+ tissue samples for culture from different locations. Avoid contamination. Label separately. Hold antibiotics until samples obtained.

Tissue Sample Protocol

Minimum 5 tissue samples from: (1) periprosthetic membrane, (2) capsule, (3) acetabular tissue, (4) femoral canal tissue, (5) any obvious collection. Send for aerobic, anaerobic, extended culture (14 days), and consider fungal/AFB if indicated.

Full exposure is critical for complete debridement.

Implant and Cement Removal

Removal Steps

Step 1Femoral Component

Dislocate hip if still located. Remove femoral head. Remove femoral stem - may require osteotomes, high-speed burr for cemented stems. Remove ALL cement meticulously. Consider ETO (extended trochanteric osteotomy) if needed.

Step 2Acetabular Component

Remove acetabular cup - use curved osteotomes at bone-implant interface. Remove screws. Remove all cement including medial cement. Curettage of sclerotic bone to bleeding surface.

Step 3Debridement

Aggressive debridement of all necrotic and infected tissue. Debride to healthy, bleeding bone. Remove all biofilm-containing surfaces. Debride greater rather than less - can always add more tissue later, cannot un-infect.

Complete Cement Removal

All cement must be removed for infection eradication. Cement is porous and harbors biofilm. Use high-speed burr, cement splitters, ultrasonic devices as needed. Radiographic confirmation at end of case.

If bone stock extremely deficient, consider mega-prosthesis reconstruction in the future versus accepting permanent Girdlestone.

Lavage and Closure

Completion Steps

Step 1Lavage

Copious irrigation - minimum 9L of normal saline. Pulsed lavage system. Some surgeons add antiseptic (dilute betadine). Irrigate all recesses of wound and canals.

Step 2Abductor Management

Preserve abductor complex on greater trochanter if viable. If trochanter infected or non-viable, will need to sacrifice. Consider soft tissue coverage of proximal femur.

Step 3Closure

Layered closure over suction drains. Close dead space to prevent seroma/hematoma. Skin closure with staples or monofilament. Drain management protocol (remove when under 30mL/24hrs).

Drain Management

Suction drains reduce hematoma/seroma formation. Remove when output less than 30mL per 24 hours, typically day 2-4. Prolonged drainage may indicate ongoing infection or joint fluid production.

Wound healing is critical - optimize nutrition and avoid tension.

Complications

Potential Complications

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Persistent infection10-30%Adequate debridement, appropriate antibiotics, suppression if needed
Wound complications15-25%Optimize nutrition, meticulous closure, manage dead space
Instability/dislocationCommon (inherent)Expected outcome - brace/abduction pillow initially
Periprosthetic fracture (during removal)5-10%Careful technique, prophylactic fixation if needed
Nerve injury (sciatic)1-3%Careful dissection, identify and protect nerve
DVT/PEVariableChemical and mechanical prophylaxis

Persistent Infection

10-30% may have persistent infection despite adequate surgery. Risk factors: resistant organisms, inadequate debridement, retained cement/foreign material, immunocompromise. Options: repeat debridement, long-term suppression, or accept chronic wound.

Managing Persistent Infection

If infection persists: (1) Confirm adequate initial debridement, (2) Review antibiotic sensitivity and compliance, (3) Consider repeat surgery for retained material, (4) Long-term oral antibiotic suppression may control but not eradicate infection.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Day 0-2Immediate

Ward care: Pain management, wound monitoring. Begin DVT prophylaxis. Drain management. Hip abduction pillow or brace for comfort. IV antibiotics continue (based on cultures).

Week 1-2Early

Mobilization: Sit out of bed day 1-2. Protected weight bearing with frame/crutches. Physiotherapy - maintain muscle function. Wound inspection. Staple removal 2 weeks.

Week 2-6Intermediate

Ongoing care: Continue IV antibiotics (typically 6 weeks minimum). Transition to oral antibiotics if appropriate. Progressive mobilization. Address LLD with shoe raise.

Month 2-6Late

Recovery phase: Complete antibiotic course. Monitor inflammatory markers (CRP should normalize). Consider reimplantation if staged procedure. Finalize walking aids, orthotics.

Antibiotic Duration

Minimum 6 weeks IV antibiotics followed by oral therapy. Duration depends on organism, response, and whether reimplantation planned. Consult infectious diseases for regimen. Monitor for drug toxicity (aminoglycosides - renal/ototoxicity, rifampicin - hepatic).

Mobilization Protocol

  • WBAT with aids - walker or crutches
  • Hip abduction strengthening
  • Gait training for LLD
  • Shoe raise 3-5cm for LLD
  • Progress to single cane over months

Monitoring

  • CRP weekly initially, then monthly
  • Wound assessment at each visit
  • Imaging if concern for retained material
  • Monitor antibiotic side effects
  • Assess function and pain

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes Summary

Outcome MeasureGirdlestone (Definitive)2-Stage with Reimplantation
Infection eradication70-80%75-85%
Harris Hip Score40-5070-85
Ambulatory status50-60% (with aids)85-95%
Patient satisfactionVariableHigher
Leg length discrepancy4-6cm1-2cm (correctable)

Functional Expectations

Definitive Girdlestone = significant disability. Most patients need walking aids permanently, have marked limp (Trendelenburg), and 4-6cm LLD. Pain relief is usually achieved. Sitting tolerance preserved. Better than ongoing sepsis but substantially worse than successful reimplantation.

Good Outcomes

  • Pain control achieved
  • Infection eradicated
  • Independent in ADLs
  • Ambulatory with aids
  • Satisfied with outcome given alternatives

Poor Outcomes

  • Persistent infection
  • Chronic wound/sinus
  • Non-ambulatory
  • Intractable pain
  • Poor quality of life

Evidence Base

Level V (Review)
📚 Sharma H et al. Girdlestone Excision Arthroplasty: Current Perspectives
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of Girdlestone procedure. Infection eradication 70-80%. Significant functional limitation but acceptable for salvage. Reimplantation improves outcomes but not always feasible.
Clinical Implication: Girdlestone remains a valid salvage option when reimplantation is not possible.
Source: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019

Level IV
📚 Oussedik S et al. Is Definitive Girdlestone Arthroplasty Still Justified?
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of definitive Girdlestone patients. 50% ambulatory with aids. Significant LLD (mean 5cm). Pain relief in majority. Recommended only when reimplantation not feasible.
Clinical Implication: Definitive Girdlestone is last resort - consider reimplantation whenever possible.
Source: J Arthroplasty 2011

Level IV
📚 Garvin KL et al. Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected Hip Arthroplasty
Key Findings:
  • Two-stage exchange with interim spacer achieves higher reimplantation rates and better function than resection arthroplasty alone. Infection control rates similar.
Clinical Implication: If reimplantation candidate, use spacer to maintain soft tissue tension during staging.
Source: JBJS Am 1995

Level IV
📚 Castellanos J et al. Antibiotic Spacer in Two-Stage Exchange
Key Findings:
  • Articulating antibiotic spacer improves interim function, maintains soft tissue tension, and facilitates reimplantation compared to static spacer or Girdlestone.
Clinical Implication: Articulating spacer preferred for 2-stage if patient fit for reimplantation.
Source: J Arthroplasty 2006

Level V (Consensus)
📚 Parvizi J et al. MSIS Workgroup - Definition of PJI
Key Findings:
  • Established standardized criteria for PJI diagnosis. Major criteria: sinus tract, 2+ positive cultures. Minor criteria: elevated ESR/CRP, synovial WCC/PMN%, histology, single positive culture.
Clinical Implication: Use MSIS criteria for standardized PJI diagnosis and treatment decisions.
Source: Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 1: Failed 2-Stage Revision

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old diabetic man has had 2 previous revisions for infected THA over 5 years. He now presents with recurrent infection (MRSA), draining sinus, and HbA1c of 9.5%. He is a widower living alone with minimal family support."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a challenging case of multiply recurrent PJI in a comorbid patient with social limitations. The key issues are: (1) Recurrent infection after multiple surgical attempts, (2) Resistant organism (MRSA), (3) Poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c 9.5%), (4) Limited social support. My approach would be: **Initial management**: 1. Optimize diabetes (HbA1c target under 8%) 2. Current wound management (dressings, suppressive antibiotics) 3. Nutritional assessment (albumin, prealbumin) 4. Multidisciplinary discussion: ID, geriatrics, social work **Decision making**: Given multiple failed revisions, resistant organism, and medical/social factors, options are: 1. **Another 2-stage revision** - low probability of success after 2 failures 2. **Definitive Girdlestone** - infection control priority 3. **Chronic suppression** - if not fit for surgery I would recommend **definitive Girdlestone excision arthroplasty**: - Goal: eradicate infection and provide pain relief - Accept permanent functional limitation - Extensive counseling about LLD (4-6cm), need for aids, Trendelenburg gait **Surgical approach**: - Lateral decubitus, posterior approach through previous incision - Complete removal of all components, cement, infected tissue - 5+ tissue samples before antibiotics - Copious lavage (9L+), preserve abductors if viable - IV vancomycin for 6 weeks, then long-term oral suppression given MRSA **Postoperative**: - Walking aids permanently, shoe raise - May need support for living situation
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Multiple failed revisions favor definitive excision
Diabetes and MRSA are risk factors for recurrence
Thorough counseling about significant functional limitation
Consider chronic suppression as part of management
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting another 2-stage with low success probability
✗Not optimizing diabetes preoperatively
✗Forgetting social circumstances in discharge planning
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you manage if he refuses surgery?"
"What antibiotics would you use for MRSA?"
"What if infection persists after Girdlestone?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Staging for Reimplantation

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old otherwise healthy woman presents with infected THA (Staphylococcus epidermidis, susceptible) 2 years post primary. DAIR failed after 6 weeks. She is motivated for best functional outcome and wants to return to golf."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a favorable scenario for 2-stage revision with good likelihood of reimplantation. She is young, healthy, has a susceptible organism, and high functional expectations. My approach: **First stage**: 1. **Remove all components and cement** via previous posterior approach 2. **Aggressive debridement** of infected and necrotic tissue 3. **5+ tissue samples** before starting antibiotics 4. **Antibiotic-loaded articulating spacer** (vancomycin + tobramycin in PMMA) rather than Girdlestone: - Maintains soft tissue tension - Better interim function - Facilitates reimplantation 5. **Copious lavage** (9L+) **Antibiotic protocol**: - IV vancomycin for 6 weeks (organism susceptible) - Monitor CRP/ESR weekly - Transition to oral as directed by ID **Timing of second stage**: - Minimum 6-8 weeks antibiotic course - CRP normalized - Wound healed - No clinical signs of infection - Some surgeons do repeat aspiration **Second stage**: - Revision THA with appropriate reconstruction - Fresh tissue samples at reimplantation - Continue antibiotics until cultures negative **Expected outcome**: - 75-85% success for infection eradication - Harris Hip Score 70-85 expected - Return to golf is realistic goal
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Articulating spacer preferred for 2-stage if reimplantation planned
Susceptible organism and healthy patient favor good outcome
Minimum 6 weeks antibiotics between stages
CRP normalization before second stage
COMMON TRAPS
✗Doing definitive Girdlestone in a young, fit patient
✗Using static spacer when articulating would be better
✗Rushing to second stage before infection controlled
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if CRP remains elevated after 6 weeks?"
"How do you decide articulating vs static spacer?"
"What if cultures are positive at second stage?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Intraoperative Finding

EXAMINER

"During first stage of 2-stage revision for PJI, you encounter severe acetabular bone loss with a cavitary defect and pelvic discontinuity. The femur has reasonable stock. What do you do?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a challenging intraoperative finding that significantly affects the reconstruction plan. Pelvic discontinuity with cavitary defect means acetabular reconstruction for reimplantation will be extremely difficult. **Immediate intraoperative management**: 1. Complete the planned debridement and implant removal 2. Take thorough tissue samples 3. Assess if discontinuity is infected vs mechanical 4. Document bone loss with photographs, consider intraop XR/fluoroscopy **Decision at first stage**: Options: 1. **Antibiotic spacer** - custom static spacer to fill dead space, but may not provide stability 2. **Girdlestone (no spacer)** - may be more practical if discontinuity prevents stable spacer I would likely proceed with **static antibiotic spacer** if it can be placed stably, or a **custom spacer bridging the defect**. **Planning for second stage**: This patient needs complex reconstruction. Options include: 1. **Cup-cage construct** with augments 2. **Triflange custom implant** (requires CT planning, 6+ week lead time) 3. **Acetabular distraction** with cage 4. **Definitive Girdlestone** if reconstruction not feasible **Discussion with patient** before second stage: - Very complex reconstruction with higher failure risk - May need multiple surgeries - Definitive Girdlestone remains an option if patient declines complexity - Consider referral to specialized revision center This case requires careful staged planning with appropriate patient counseling.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Complete first-stage debridement as planned
Document bone loss thoroughly
Pelvic discontinuity requires complex reconstruction
May need custom implant or cup-cage for second stage
COMMON TRAPS
✗Trying to do definitive reconstruction at first stage
✗Not documenting bone loss for second-stage planning
✗Not discussing complexity and alternatives with patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is pelvic discontinuity?"
"How would you reconstruct this at second stage?"
"What is a cup-cage construct?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 4: Fungal PJI

EXAMINER

"Culture from hip aspiration grows Candida albicans in a 65-year-old immunocompetent patient with painful THA. No previous surgery. What is your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Fungal PJI is rare but challenging. Candida albicans in an immunocompetent patient is unusual and requires confirmation and appropriate treatment. **Confirmation**: 1. Repeat aspiration to confirm - fungi can be contaminant 2. If confirmed on 2+ samples, this is true fungal PJI 3. Investigate for source: UTI, GI colonization, central lines 4. Consider underlying immunocompromise (undiagnosed diabetes, malignancy, HIV) **Treatment approach for confirmed fungal PJI**: Fungal PJI has poor outcomes with DAIR. I would recommend **2-stage exchange**: **First stage**: 1. Complete explantation - remove all components and cement 2. Aggressive debridement 3. **Antifungal-loaded spacer** or no spacer (Girdlestone) - Amphotericin B-loaded cement (heat stable) - Some evidence for fluconazole in cement 4. Copious lavage **Antifungal therapy**: - IV antifungals (amphotericin B or echinocandin) initially - Oral fluconazole for prolonged course (6-12 months) - ID consultation essential - Monitor for toxicity (nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity) **Second stage**: - Extended interval (minimum 6-12 weeks) - Inflammatory markers normalized - Negative aspiration if possible - Reimplantation with vigilance **Outcomes**: Fungal PJI has higher failure rates than bacterial PJI. May need prolonged/lifelong suppression. Consider definitive Girdlestone if reimplantation fails.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm fungal PJI with repeat culture - can be contaminant
DAIR not effective for fungal PJI - need 2-stage
Antifungal-loaded cement (amphotericin B) for spacer
Prolonged antifungal course (6-12 months)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming single positive culture is true infection
✗Attempting DAIR for fungal PJI
✗Not consulting ID for complex antifungal management
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What antifungals can be used in cement?"
"What is the success rate for fungal PJI?"
"Would you manage Aspergillus PJI differently?"

MCQ Practice Points

Primary Indication

Q: What is the most common indication for Girdlestone excision arthroplasty today? A: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where DAIR has failed or is contraindicated, or as interim/definitive salvage for multiply recurrent infection. It was originally described for tuberculosis of the hip.

Expected Leg Length Discrepancy

Q: What leg length discrepancy is typically expected after Girdlestone procedure? A: 4-6cm shortening - The proximal femur migrates superiorly until it articulates with the pelvis at a pseudarthrosis. This results in significant shortening requiring shoe raise and walking aids.

Tissue Samples

Q: How many tissue samples should be obtained during revision for PJI? A: Minimum 5 tissue samples from different locations (membrane, capsule, acetabulum, femoral canal, collections). Take BEFORE antibiotics. Send for aerobic, anaerobic, and extended culture.

Spacer Benefit

Q: What is the main advantage of an articulating antibiotic spacer over Girdlestone as interim procedure? A: Maintains soft tissue tension - Preserves abductor length, improves interim function, and facilitates subsequent reimplantation by keeping soft tissues at appropriate tension and length.

MSIS Criteria

Q: What are the major criteria for PJI diagnosis according to MSIS? A: Two major criteria: (1) Sinus tract communicating with the prosthesis, OR (2) Same organism isolated on 2 or more separate tissue/fluid samples. Either one confirms PJI.

Australian Context

Clinical Practice

  • Complex PJI managed at specialized arthroplasty units
  • Multidisciplinary approach (ortho, ID, micro, geriatrics)
  • National joint registry tracks outcomes
  • PBS subsidized antibiotics for PJI treatment

Healthcare Setting

  • Public tertiary hospitals for complex revision
  • OPAT (outpatient parenteral antibiotics) available
  • Rehabilitation facilities for extended recovery
  • Private sector for suitable cases

Orthopaedic Exam Focus

Australian examiners will expect: Clear understanding of PJI diagnosis (MSIS criteria), indications for Girdlestone vs 2-stage with spacer, surgical steps including tissue sampling protocol, antibiotic management principles, and realistic counseling of functional outcomes.

GIRDLESTONE PROCEDURE

High-Yield Exam Summary

Core Concepts

  • •Excision arthroplasty = SALVAGE for infected THA
  • •Named after GR Girdlestone (TB of hip, 1943)
  • •Can be DEFINITIVE or INTERIM (2-stage)
  • •Spacer preferred if reimplantation planned

Indications (RESCUE)

  • •Failed DAIR or 2-stage revision
  • •Resistant/difficult organisms (MDR, fungal)
  • •Medical comorbidities precluding revision
  • •Severe bone loss preventing reconstruction

Surgical Pearls

  • •5+ tissue samples BEFORE antibiotics
  • •Remove ALL cement (biofilm reservoir)
  • •Preserve ABDUCTORS (stability of pseudarthrosis)
  • •Copious lavage (minimum 9L)

Outcomes

  • •Infection eradication: 70-80%
  • •LLD: 4-6cm (need shoe raise)
  • •50-60% ambulatory with aids
  • •Harris Hip Score ~40-50 (vs 70-85 with reimplantation)

Exam Pearls

  • •MSIS criteria for PJI diagnosis
  • •Minimum 6 weeks IV antibiotics
  • •Trendelenburg gait expected
  • •Better than ongoing sepsis
Quick Stats
Reading Time98 min
Related Topics

TKA Aseptic Loosening

TKA Extensor Mechanism Failure

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Labelled White Cell Scanning for Infection