Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Lateral Compression Pelvic Injuries

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Lateral Compression Pelvic Injuries

Lateral compression (LC) pelvic ring injuries - Young-Burgess classification, mechanism, associated injuries, and management from hemodynamically stable to unstable patients

complete
Updated: 2025-12-16

Lateral Compression Pelvic Injuries

Lateral compression (LC) injuries are the most common pelvic ring injury pattern, accounting for 50-60% of all pelvic fractures. They result from a laterally directed force causing internal rotation of the hemipelvis, with the injury severity ranging from stable rami fractures (LC-I) to rotationally and vertically unstable patterns (LC-III).

High Yield Overview

LATERAL COMPRESSION PELVIC INJURIES

Most Common | Internal Rotation | Rami + Sacrum | LC-I Stable | LC-III Unstable

50-60%Of all pelvic ring injuries
LC-IMost common subtype (70% of LC)
InternalRotation deformity pattern
Morel-LavalleeSoft tissue degloving lesion

YOUNG-BURGESS LC CLASSIFICATION

LC-I
PatternRami fractures + ipsilateral sacral impaction
TreatmentUsually conservative - stable
LC-II
PatternLC-I + posterior iliac wing fracture (crescent)
TreatmentMay need fixation
LC-III
PatternLC-I or II + contralateral APC injury (windswept)
TreatmentUnstable - surgical fixation

Critical Must-Knows

  • LC is most common pelvic ring injury pattern (50-60%)
  • Internal rotation deformity - pelvis narrows (vs APC which opens)
  • Anterior ring: Ipsilateral pubic rami fractures
  • Posterior ring: Sacral impaction (LC-I), crescent fracture (LC-II)
  • LC-III = windswept pelvis: Contralateral APC component = unstable

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    LC injuries tend to have LESS hemorrhage than APC (pelvis closes, tamponades)
  • "
    Head injuries common with LC (lateral impact same as head impact)
  • "
    Morel-Lavallee lesion = closed degloving over trochanter
  • "
    LC-I often missed initially - look for sacral impaction line
  • "
    LC-III is rotationally unstable - don't miss contralateral injury

Exam Warning

Critical Exam Points - Lateral Compression Injuries:

  1. MOST COMMON pelvic ring injury (50-60%) - know this cold
  2. INTERNAL ROTATION deformity - pelvis narrows, hemipelvis rotates in
  3. LC-I: Rami + sacral impaction = most common, usually stable, often conservative
  4. LC-II: Adds crescent (iliac wing) fracture = may need fixation
  5. LC-III: Windswept = LC on one side + APC on contralateral = UNSTABLE
  6. Less hemorrhage than APC (pelvis closes) but DON'T be complacent
  7. Associated head injuries - same lateral mechanism

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

FeatureLC-ILC-IILC-III
Anterior InjuryIpsilateral rami fracturesIpsilateral rami fracturesBilateral rami or symphysis
Posterior InjurySacral impaction (Zone 1)Crescent fracture (iliac wing)Ipsi LC + Contra APC
Rotational StabilityStableVariableUNSTABLE
Vertical StabilityStableStablePotentially unstable
Hemorrhage RiskLowModerateHigh
ManagementConservativeConsider fixationSurgical fixation
Mnemonic

L CLC - Lateral Compression Features

L
Lateral force causes LESS bleeding
pelvis closes
C
Compression narrows pelvis
internal rotation

Memory Hook:LC = Lateral Compression = LESS bleeding, pelvis CLOSES (internal rotation)

Mnemonic

THREETHREE - LC Types

T
Type I = rami + sacral impaction
most common, stable
H
Higher energy in
Type II adds crescent fracture
R
Rotationally unstable in
Type III
E
External rotation added
contralaterally in LC-III
E
Each type progressively
more unstable

Memory Hook:LC-I = stable, LC-II = intermediate, LC-III = unstable (windswept)

Overview/Epidemiology

Epidemiology

AP pelvis X-ray showing fractures of the superior and inferior pubic rami
Click to expand
AP pelvis X-ray demonstrating pubic rami fractures - the hallmark anterior ring injury in lateral compression pelvic fractures. Note fractures through superior and inferior pubic rami on the right side.Credit: James Heilman, MD via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Incidence:

  • Most common pelvic ring injury pattern (50-60% of all pelvic fractures)
  • LC-I accounts for 70% of lateral compression injuries
  • More common in motor vehicle accidents (T-bone collisions)
  • Also common in pedestrian strikes

Demographics:

  • All age groups affected
  • Bimodal distribution: Young (high-energy MVA) and elderly (low-energy falls)
  • No significant gender predilection
  • Higher incidence in areas with higher traffic volume

Mechanism Distribution:

  • Motor vehicle accidents: 60-70%
  • Pedestrian vs vehicle: 15-20%
  • Falls from height: 10-15%
  • Other mechanisms: 5%

Associated Injuries:

  • Head injuries: 40-50% (same lateral impact)
  • Acetabular fractures: 20-30%
  • Long bone fractures: 30-40%
  • Thoracic injuries: 20-30%
  • Neurological injuries: 10-20% (sacral fractures)

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Pelvic Ring Anatomy

Pelvic Ring Concept

Osseous Ring Components:

  • Anterior ring: Pubic symphysis + superior/inferior pubic rami
  • Posterior ring: Sacrum + sacroiliac joints + posterior ilium

Key Principle: The pelvic ring cannot break in one place - if there's an anterior injury, there MUST be a posterior injury (and vice versa). Always search for the second break.

Mechanism of Injury

Lateral Compression Force:

  • Force directed laterally (side impact)
  • Common scenarios: MVA (T-bone), pedestrian struck, fall from height landing on side
  • Force causes internal rotation of the hemipelvis

Resultant Deformity:

  • Hemipelvis rotates INTERNALLY
  • Pelvis narrows (in contrast to APC which widens)
  • Creates compression anteriorly and posteriorly

Understanding the Deformity

LC = Internal Rotation = Pelvis Narrows

  • The involved hemipelvis rotates inward
  • This CLOSES the pelvic volume (less space for hemorrhage)
  • Generally less hemodynamically unstable than APC
  • But don't be complacent - severe LC can still bleed significantly

Associated Injuries - Important for LC

Head Injuries:

  • Very common with LC mechanism
  • Same lateral force that hits pelvis also hits head
  • Always assess neurological status

Morel-Lavallee Lesion:

  • Closed internal degloving injury
  • Shear between skin/fat and underlying fascia
  • Typically over greater trochanter
  • Can occur without external wound
  • Delayed presentation possible
  • MRI for diagnosis if suspected

Morel-Lavallee Lesion

A closed degloving injury over the trochanter caused by the same lateral force as the LC injury. Can create a large fluid collection that may become infected. Important to identify before surgical incisions. MRI is diagnostic - look for fluid collection between fat and fascia.

Pelvic Stability Determinants

Posterior Ring is Key:

  • 60% of pelvic stability from posterior structures
  • SI ligament complex (anterior, posterior, interosseous)
  • Posterior tension band (iliolumbar, lumbosacral, sacrospinous, sacrotuberous ligaments)

In LC Injuries:

  • LC-I: Posterior ligaments intact, sacral impaction only = STABLE
  • LC-II: Partial posterior disruption (crescent fracture) = VARIABLE stability
  • LC-III: Both SI joint disruptions (ipsi LC + contra APC) = UNSTABLE

Classification Systems

Young-Burgess Classification

LC Type I (Most Common)

AP pelvis X-ray showing open book pelvic injury with symphyseal diastasis
Click to expand
AP pelvis X-ray demonstrating an APC (open book) pelvic injury with widening of the pubic symphysis and internal fixation hardware. In LC-III injuries, this APC pattern occurs on the contralateral side to the LC injury, creating the characteristic windswept pelvis deformity.Credit: Nevit Dilmen via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Pattern:

  • Anterior: Ipsilateral pubic rami fractures (superior and/or inferior)
  • Posterior: Ipsilateral sacral impaction fracture (usually Zone 1)

Characteristics:

  • Most common LC subtype (70% of LC injuries)
  • Generally stable (both rotationally and vertically)
  • Posterior ligaments INTACT
  • Sacral impaction often subtle on X-ray (need CT)

Stability:

  • Rotationally stable
  • Vertically stable
  • Often treated conservatively

Management:

  • Usually conservative treatment
  • Analgesia and DVT prophylaxis
  • Early mobilization as tolerated
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated

LC-I injuries typically have excellent outcomes with non-operative management.

LC Type II

Pattern:

  • Anterior: Ipsilateral pubic rami fractures
  • Posterior: Crescent fracture (posterior iliac wing fracture)

Crescent Fracture:

  • Fracture through posterior ilium
  • Creates a crescent-shaped fragment attached to sacrum via intact SI joint
  • Represents higher energy than LC-I
  • May have partial SI joint disruption

Stability:

  • Variable rotational stability
  • Usually vertically stable (SI joint partially intact via crescent fragment)
  • May need surgical fixation

Management:

  • Assess stability carefully
  • Consider fixation if unstable on exam
  • May need posterior plating or SI screws

LC-II management depends on careful assessment of rotational stability.

LC Type III (Windswept Pelvis)

Pattern:

  • Ipsilateral: LC pattern (rami + sacral impaction or crescent)
  • Contralateral: APC pattern (external rotation injury)
  • Results in "windswept" appearance

Mechanism:

  • Higher energy injury
  • Continued lateral force rolls pelvis through
  • Creates internal rotation on impact side, external rotation on opposite side

Stability:

  • Rotationally UNSTABLE (bilateral rotational injuries)
  • May be vertically unstable
  • Requires surgical stabilization

Management:

  • Surgical fixation required
  • Bilateral fixation needed
  • Anterior and posterior stabilization

LC-III injuries are unstable and require operative intervention.

LC Classification Summary

TypeAnteriorPosteriorStabilityTreatment
LC-IIpsilateral ramiSacral impactionStableConservative
LC-IIIpsilateral ramiCrescent fractureVariableConsider fixation
LC-IIIBilateralIpsi LC + Contra APCUNSTABLESurgical fixation

Tile Classification Correlation

Young-BurgessTileDescription
LC-IB2.1Stable internal rotation
LC-IIB2.2Partially unstable (crescent)
LC-IIICCompletely unstable
Mnemonic

CRESCENTCRESCENT - LC-II Features

C
Crescent fracture through
posterior ilium
R
Rami fractures anteriorly
as in LC-I
E
Energy higher than
LC-I
S
SI joint partially intact
fragment attached
C
Consider fixation
variable stability
E
Evaluate carefully for
stability
N
Not as unstable
as LC-III
T
Through-and-through posterior ilium
fracture

Memory Hook:CRESCENT fracture = LC-II = posterior iliac wing fracture keeping crescent attached to sacrum

Clinical Assessment

Initial Assessment

Presentation

History:

  • Mechanism of injury (lateral impact)
  • Level of consciousness (associated head injury common)
  • Ability to ambulate
  • Pain location

Primary Survey:

  • ABC assessment
  • Hemodynamic status
  • Pelvic stability testing (ONCE only, gently)
  • Associated injuries

Examination

Inspection:

  • Leg length discrepancy
  • Rotational deformity
  • Ecchymosis over pelvis/perineum
  • Open wounds (including perineum, vagina, rectum)
  • Morel-Lavallee lesion (bruising/fluctuance over trochanter)

Palpation:

  • Tenderness over symphysis
  • Tenderness over SI joints
  • Tenderness over iliac crests
  • Crepitus (may indicate unstable fragments)

Pelvic Stability Testing

Test pelvic stability ONCE and GENTLY:

  • Performed during primary survey
  • Apply gentle AP compression and lateral compression to iliac crests
  • Do NOT repeatedly test - can disrupt clot and worsen hemorrhage
  • If unstable, apply pelvic binder immediately
  • Document findings clearly

Associated Injuries to Assess

Urogenital:

  • Blood at urethral meatus = urethral injury (do NOT catheterize)
  • Hematuria
  • High-riding prostate on DRE
  • Vaginal/scrotal hematoma

Neurological:

  • Lumbosacral plexus injury
  • L4-S1 nerve roots (sacral fractures)
  • Assess motor and sensory function

Other:

  • Head injury (very common with LC)
  • Abdominal injuries
  • Long bone fractures
  • Acetabular fractures (same mechanism)

Hemodynamic Considerations

LC Injuries Generally Bleed Less Than APC:

  • Internal rotation closes pelvis
  • Tamponades bleeding to some extent
  • But can still have significant hemorrhage

Don't Be Complacent:

  • LC-III can have substantial bleeding
  • Associated injuries may contribute
  • Assess and reassess hemodynamic status

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

Plain Radiographs

AP Pelvis (First-Line):

  • Standard in all trauma patients
  • Assess pelvic ring continuity
  • Look for rami fractures
  • Assess symphysis width
  • Assess SI joint symmetry

Inlet View:

  • AP/internal rotation assessment
  • Assess posterior displacement
  • Shows sacral impaction

Outlet View:

  • Superior/inferior displacement
  • Assess sacral fractures
  • Neural foramina assessment

CT Scan (Essential)

CT is Mandatory

CT scan is mandatory for all pelvic ring injuries to:

  • Identify sacral fractures (often occult on X-ray)
  • Classify injury accurately
  • Assess posterior ring stability
  • Identify associated injuries (acetabulum, lumbar spine)
  • Plan surgical approach if needed

CT Assessment:

  • Sacral fracture pattern (Zone 1, 2, 3)
  • SI joint integrity
  • Crescent fracture identification
  • Posterior ligamentous structures
  • Neural canal involvement
  • Associated acetabular fractures

MRI (Selected Cases)

Indications:

  • Suspected ligamentous injury without fracture
  • Neurological deficit evaluation
  • SI joint instability assessment
  • Morel-Lavallee lesion evaluation

Sacral Fracture Zones (Denis)

ZoneLocationStructures at RiskLC Association
1Sacral ala (lateral to foramina)L5 nerve rootLC-I most common
2Through foraminaS1-S4 nerve rootsLC-I, LC-II
3Central canalCauda equinaLess common in LC

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
lateral compression injuries management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for lateral compression injuriesCredit: OrthoVellum

Management Decision Tree

1. Hemodynamically Unstable:

  • Resuscitation, pelvic binder
  • Angiography/embolization vs external fixation vs preperitoneal packing
  • Definitive fixation when stable

2. Hemodynamically Stable:

  • Complete imaging (CT)
  • Classify injury
  • LC-I: Usually conservative
  • LC-II: Assess stability - may need fixation
  • LC-III: Surgical fixation required

Immediate Management

Resuscitation:

  • ATLS protocol
  • Massive transfusion protocol if needed
  • Pelvic binder application

Damage Control Options:

  • Angiography/embolization: First-line for arterial bleeding
  • Preperitoneal packing: If angio unavailable or venous bleeding
  • External fixation: Temporary stabilization

Definitive Treatment:

  • Once patient stabilized
  • Convert to internal fixation at 24-72 hours

Hemodynamically unstable patients require immediate resuscitation and hemorrhage control.

Treatment by Classification

LC-I (Conservative):

  • Analgesia (multimodal)
  • DVT prophylaxis
  • Early mobilization as tolerated
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated
  • Follow-up imaging at 6 weeks

LC-II (Assess Stability):

  • Clinical stability testing
  • Consider fixation if unstable
  • Posterior fixation if needed
  • May treat conservatively if stable

LC-III (Surgical Fixation):

  • Bilateral fixation required
  • Anterior and posterior stabilization
  • Timing: When patient optimized

Management strategy depends on injury classification and patient hemodynamic status.

Initial Stabilization

Pelvic Binder:

  • Apply in ED if instability suspected
  • Centered at level of greater trochanters (NOT iliac crests)
  • Can be improvised with sheet if commercial binder unavailable
  • Monitor skin under binder

For LC Injuries:

  • Binder less effective than APC (pelvis already closed)
  • Still apply if unstable
  • May actually worsen internal rotation - monitor carefully

Conservative Management (LC-I)

Indications:

  • Stable LC-I injuries
  • Minimal displacement
  • Patient can tolerate limited mobilization

Protocol:

  • Analgesia (multimodal)
  • DVT prophylaxis (critical)
  • Early mobilization as tolerated
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated (depends on symptoms)
  • PT assessment
  • Follow-up imaging at 6 weeks

Surgical Management

Indications for Surgery:

  • LC-II with instability
  • All LC-III injuries
  • Significant displacement
  • Associated acetabular fracture requiring fixation
  • Polytrauma requiring mobilization
Mnemonic

FIXFIX - Surgical Indications

F
Failed conservative management
or LC-III
I
Instability
rotational or vertical
X
X-ray shows significant
displacement

Memory Hook:FIX LC injuries when unstable or significantly displaced

Surgical Options

Anterior Fixation:

  • Symphyseal plating (if symphysis disrupted in LC-III)
  • Rami plating (rarely needed for LC)
  • External fixation (damage control)

Posterior Fixation:

  • Percutaneous SI screws (most common)
  • Posterior plating
  • Spinopelvic fixation (severe instability)

Timing:

  • Damage control: External fixation acutely
  • Definitive fixation: When patient optimized (24-72h typically)
  • LC-I may never need surgery

Surgical Technique

Fixation Techniques for LC Injuries

Posterior Fixation - Percutaneous SI Screws

Most Common Technique for LC-II/III

Positioning:

  • Supine on radiolucent table
  • Image intensifier with inlet and outlet views

Approach:

  • Percutaneous technique
  • Entry point: Lateral ilium, above greater sciatic notch
  • Direction: Anterior and medial toward S1 body

Technique:

  • Inlet view: Confirm anterior-posterior trajectory
  • Outlet view: Confirm superior-inferior trajectory (avoid neural foramina)
  • Guidewire placement under fluoroscopy
  • Measure screw length (typically 80-100mm)
  • Fully threaded lag screw or partially threaded compression screw
  • Place 1-2 screws into S1 (S2 if needed)

Key Pearls:

  • Inlet and outlet views mandatory throughout
  • Avoid neural foramina (outlet view)
  • Avoid anterior cortex of sacrum (inlet view)
  • Compression across SI joint improves stability

Percutaneous SI screws are the gold standard for posterior ring fixation in LC injuries.

Posterior Fixation - Open Plating

Indications:

  • Crescent fractures (LC-II)
  • Comminuted sacral fractures
  • Failed percutaneous technique

Approach:

  • Patient prone or lateral decubitus
  • Incision along posterior iliac crest
  • Expose posterior ilium and SI joint

Fixation:

  • Reconstruction plate along posterior ilium
  • Screws into ilium and sacrum
  • May combine with SI screws

Open plating provides direct visualization and is particularly useful for crescent fractures.

Anterior Fixation

Indications:

  • LC-III with symphyseal disruption
  • Bilateral rami fractures with anterior instability

Approach:

  • Pfannenstiel or lower midline
  • Expose symphysis pubis

Fixation:

  • 4-hole symphyseal plate
  • Position plate on superior aspect of symphysis
  • Two screws each side

Alternative - Rami Fixation:

  • Rarely needed for LC
  • Percutaneous or ORIF techniques
  • Consider if significant displacement

Anterior fixation is typically only needed for LC-III injuries with symphyseal disruption.

Damage Control - External Fixation

When to Use:

  • Hemodynamically unstable patient
  • Temporary stabilization
  • Bridge to definitive fixation

Technique:

  • Supine positioning
  • 5mm Schanz pins in anterior iliac crest
  • Connect with external fixator frame
  • Apply gentle compression for LC injuries

Conversion:

  • Remove at time of definitive fixation
  • Replace with internal fixation
  • Typically 24-72 hours post-injury

External fixation serves as a temporary damage control measure until definitive fixation.

Complications

Early and Late Complications

Early Complications

Hemorrhage:

  • Less than APC but still significant
  • Arterial (superior gluteal, pudendal) or venous
  • May need angioembolization or packing

Associated Injuries:

  • Urethral injury (less common in LC than APC)
  • Bladder injury
  • Neurological injury (sacral fractures)

Morel-Lavallee Lesion:

  • May need drainage or debridement
  • Can delay wound healing
  • Infection risk if not addressed

Late Complications

Malunion:

  • Leg length discrepancy
  • Pelvic obliquity
  • Gait abnormality
  • Sitting difficulty

Post-Traumatic Arthritis:

  • SI joint arthritis
  • May develop despite good reduction

Chronic Pain:

  • SI joint pain common
  • May need delayed fusion

Neurological:

  • Persistent nerve injury (L5, S1-S4)
  • More common with sacral fractures through foramina

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative Management

First 24-48 Hours:

  • Monitor neurovascular status
  • Pain control (multimodal analgesia)
  • DVT prophylaxis (critical - high risk)
  • Incentive spirometry
  • Early mobilization to chair

Weight-Bearing Status

LC-I (Conservative Treatment):

  • Weight-bearing as tolerated
  • May use walking aids initially
  • Progress based on pain

LC-II/III (Surgical Fixation):

  • First 6 weeks: Touch weight-bearing (10-15kg) with crutches or frame
  • 6-12 weeks: Progressive weight-bearing if radiographic healing
  • 12+ weeks: Full weight-bearing once healed

Special Considerations:

  • Bilateral injuries may need wheelchair initially
  • Posterior ring instability delays full weight-bearing
  • Follow serial X-rays to assess healing

DVT Prophylaxis

Critical Importance:

  • Pelvic fractures = high VTE risk
  • Combined mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis

Protocol:

  • LMWH or fondaparinux (start when safe)
  • Compression stockings/intermittent pneumatic compression
  • Early mobilization
  • Continue for 6 weeks minimum
  • Consider 3 months for high-risk patients

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1 (0-6 weeks):

  • Protected weight-bearing
  • Gentle ROM exercises (hip, knee)
  • Core strengthening (isometric)
  • Gait training with aids

Phase 2 (6-12 weeks):

  • Progressive weight-bearing
  • Strengthening exercises
  • Balance and proprioception training
  • Pool therapy if available

Phase 3 (12+ weeks):

  • Full weight-bearing
  • Sport-specific rehabilitation
  • Return to work planning
  • Address any residual deficits

Follow-Up Schedule

Timing:

  • 2 weeks: Wound check, neurovascular assessment
  • 6 weeks: X-rays, assess healing, advance weight-bearing
  • 12 weeks: X-rays, consider full weight-bearing
  • 6 months: Final X-rays, functional assessment
  • 12 months: Long-term outcome evaluation

Red Flags to Monitor:

  • Increasing pain (hardware failure, non-union)
  • Loss of reduction
  • Neurological changes
  • Wound complications
  • Signs of DVT/PE

Outcomes/Prognosis

Functional Outcomes by Injury Type

LC-I (Excellent Prognosis):

  • Over 90% return to pre-injury function
  • Most patients return to work within 3-6 months
  • Low rate of chronic pain (under 20%)
  • Minimal long-term disability
  • Conservative treatment highly successful

LC-II (Good Prognosis):

  • 70-80% return to full function
  • May have residual SI joint pain (30-40%)
  • Return to work 4-9 months typically
  • Outcomes better with appropriate surgical fixation if unstable
  • Some patients require long-term analgesia

LC-III (Fair to Good Prognosis):

  • 50-70% return to baseline function
  • Higher rate of chronic pain and disability
  • Often limited by associated injuries
  • Return to work 6-12+ months
  • May require workplace modifications
  • Psychological impact significant

Outcomes by LC Type

Outcome MeasureLC-ILC-IILC-III
Return to FunctionOver 90%70-80%50-70%
Chronic PainUnder 20%30-40%Over 50%
Need for SurgeryUnder 10%30-50%Over 90%
Return to Work3-6 months4-9 months6-12+ months
Overall PrognosisExcellentGoodFair

Prognostic Factors

Better Outcomes:

  • LC-I pattern (stable)
  • Younger age (under 50)
  • No associated injuries
  • Early mobilization
  • Appropriate treatment selection

Worse Outcomes:

  • LC-III pattern (unstable)
  • Elderly patients (over 65)
  • Multiple associated injuries
  • Delayed or inadequate treatment
  • Comorbidities (diabetes, osteoporosis)

Union and Healing

Pelvic Ring Healing:

  • Most LC injuries unite with conservative or surgical treatment
  • Healing time: 8-12 weeks typically
  • Non-union rare (under 5%)
  • Malunion more common than non-union

Factors Affecting Healing:

  • Displacement degree
  • Stability of fixation
  • Patient compliance with weight-bearing restrictions
  • Smoking (delays healing)
  • NSAIDs (may impair healing - use cautiously)

Long-Term Considerations

Post-Traumatic Arthritis:

  • SI joint arthritis develops in 20-40% of LC injuries
  • Risk higher with residual displacement
  • May require delayed SI fusion

Sexual Function:

  • May be affected, especially in LC-III
  • Discuss openly with patients
  • Referral to appropriate specialists if needed

Childbirth:

  • Most women can deliver vaginally after healed LC injury
  • Caesarean section may be needed if significant pelvic deformity
  • Discuss with obstetrics early in pregnancy

Evidence Base

Young-Burgess Classification System

Level IV
Young JW, Burgess AR • Urban and Schwarzenberg (1987)
Key Findings:
  • Landmark publication establishing the mechanism-based classification of pelvic ring injuries. Divided injuries into lateral compression (LC), anteroposterior compression (APC), vertical shear (VS), and combined mechanism. This classification remains the most widely used for pelvic ring injuries and directly guides management decisions.
  • Key point: LC injuries are most common (50-60%) and result from internal rotation force
Clinical Implication: Use Young-Burgess classification to guide treatment decisions - LC-I typically conservative, LC-II assess stability, LC-III requires surgical fixation.

Pelvic Ring Stability Assessment

Level IV
Tile M • J Am Acad Orthop Surg (1996)
Key Findings:
  • Classic review of pelvic ring injury classification and stability assessment. Divided injuries into stable (Type A), rotationally unstable/vertically stable (Type B), and rotationally and vertically unstable (Type C). LC injuries span Types A, B, and C depending on severity.
  • Key point: LC-I is typically Type A/B2 (stable), LC-III is Type C (unstable)
Clinical Implication: Posterior ring integrity determines stability - assess carefully with CT to classify and guide fixation decisions.

Conservative Management of LC-I

Level IV
Osterhoff G, et al • Injury (2019)
Key Findings:
  • Review of pelvic ring fracture management demonstrating excellent outcomes with conservative treatment for stable LC-I injuries. Early mobilization and weight-bearing as tolerated recommended. Surgical fixation reserved for unstable patterns (LC-II with instability, LC-III).
  • Key point: LC-I has excellent outcomes with conservative management
Clinical Implication: LC-I injuries can be safely managed conservatively with excellent outcomes - avoid unnecessary surgery.

Morel-Lavallee Lesion Association

Level IV
Hak DJ, et al • J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Review of closed internal degloving injuries (Morel-Lavallee lesions) associated with pelvic and acetabular fractures. Identified LC mechanism as common cause. Recommended MRI for diagnosis and early drainage/debridement to prevent complications including infection and delayed wound healing.
  • Key point: Morel-Lavallee lesions common with LC - identify before surgery
Clinical Implication: Always examine for and image suspected Morel-Lavallee lesions before surgery to prevent wound complications.

Head Injury Association with LC

Level III
Demetriades D, et al • J Trauma (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Analysis of associated injuries with pelvic fractures showing significantly higher rate of head injuries with lateral compression mechanism compared to other patterns. The same lateral force that causes the pelvic injury also impacts the head. Emphasizes importance of neurological assessment.
  • Key point: Head injuries common with LC - same lateral impact mechanism
Clinical Implication: Maintain high suspicion for head injury in LC pelvic fractures - thorough neurological assessment is essential.

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old male pedestrian struck by a car presents with lateral pelvic pain. X-ray shows left pubic rami fractures. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Initial Assessment:

  • Primary survey with hemodynamic assessment
  • Pelvic stability test (ONCE, gently)
  • Neurovascular examination of lower limbs
  • Look for associated head injury (same mechanism)
  • Examine for Morel-Lavallee lesion over trochanter
  • Check for open injury (perineum, vagina, rectum)

Imaging:

  • AP pelvis X-ray shows rami fractures - anterior ring injury confirmed
  • CT pelvis is MANDATORY to identify posterior injury
  • Look for sacral impaction (LC-I) or crescent fracture (LC-II)
  • Check for contralateral APC component (LC-III)

Classification:

  • LC-I: Rami + sacral impaction = stable, usually conservative
  • LC-II: Rami + crescent fracture = assess stability
  • LC-III: Windswept = unstable, needs surgery

Management:

  • If LC-I: Conservative - analgesia, DVT prophylaxis, mobilize as tolerated
  • If LC-II/III: Discuss surgical fixation options
  • Address associated injuries
  • Follow-up imaging at 6 weeks
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
LC injury most likely based on mechanism
Pelvic ring must have anterior AND posterior injury
CT scan mandatory to identify sacral impaction or crescent fracture
Classify as LC-I, II, or III
Assess for associated injuries (head, Morel-Lavallee)
LC-I usually conservative, LC-II/III may need surgery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing the posterior ring injury - always look for sacral impaction
✗Relying on X-ray alone - CT is mandatory
✗Not examining for Morel-Lavallee lesion
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if CT shows a crescent fracture?"
"How would you manage if hemodynamically unstable?"
"What DVT prophylaxis would you use?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"How do you differentiate LC-I, LC-II, and LC-III injuries? What determines stability?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

LC-I (Most Common, Stable):

  • Anterior: Ipsilateral pubic rami fractures
  • Posterior: Sacral impaction fracture (usually Zone 1)
  • Mechanism: Lower energy lateral compression
  • Stability: Rotationally AND vertically stable
  • Treatment: Usually conservative

LC-II (Variable Stability):

  • Anterior: Ipsilateral pubic rami fractures
  • Posterior: Crescent fracture (posterior ilium)
  • Mechanism: Higher energy than LC-I
  • Stability: Variable - SI joint partially disrupted
  • Treatment: Assess stability, consider fixation

LC-III (Windswept, Unstable):

  • Anterior: Often bilateral rami or symphysis disruption
  • Posterior: LC pattern one side, APC pattern contralateral
  • Mechanism: Continued force rolls pelvis through
  • Stability: Rotationally UNSTABLE
  • Treatment: Surgical fixation required

Key Point:

The posterior ring determines stability. In LC-I, the posterior ligaments are intact despite the sacral fracture. In LC-II, the crescent fracture partially disrupts the posterior complex. In LC-III, bilateral rotational injuries make the pelvis completely rotationally unstable.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
LC-I: Rami + sacral impaction, stable, posterior ligaments intact
LC-II: Rami + crescent fracture, variable stability
LC-III: Windswept (ipsi LC + contra APC), rotationally UNSTABLE
Posterior ring determines stability
CT essential for accurate classification
Treatment differs significantly between types
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing LC with APC - LC is internal rotation, APC is external rotation
✗Not checking the contralateral side - miss LC-III
✗Assuming all LC injuries are stable - LC-III is unstable
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How does the Tile classification correlate?"
"What fixation would you use for LC-III?"
"Why does LC bleed less than APC?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A patient with an LC injury has fluctuance and bruising over the greater trochanter. What is this and how do you manage it?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Diagnosis:

  • Clinical suspicion with bruising/fluctuance over trochanter
  • May be occult initially - can present late
  • MRI is investigation of choice
  • Shows fluid collection between subcutaneous fat and fascia

Significance:

  • Large cavity prone to hematoma formation
  • Risk of infection and delayed wound healing
  • Can compromise surgical incisions if not addressed
  • May need drainage or debridement

Management:

  • Identify before any surgical intervention
  • Avoid incisions through the lesion if possible
  • Drainage options: Percutaneous aspiration (may need repeated), open drainage
  • Consider dead space management (suction drain, quilting sutures)
  • Debride necrotic tissue if present
  • May delay definitive fixation if extensive

Key Point:

Always examine for Morel-Lavallee lesion in LC injuries. Missing it can lead to wound complications, infection, and failed surgery. MRI before surgery if suspected.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Morel-Lavallee lesion = closed internal degloving
Caused by same lateral force as LC injury
Creates fluid collection between fat and fascia
Can be occult initially - high index of suspicion
MRI is diagnostic investigation of choice
Must be addressed before/during surgical fixation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing the lesion - can be occult initially
✗Incising through the lesion during surgery
✗Not addressing before definitive fixation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you manage a large Morel-Lavallee?"
"Would you delay surgery for this lesion?"
"What are the long-term complications if missed?"

MCQ Practice Points

High-Yield Exam Facts

Classification Essentials:

  • LC injuries are the MOST COMMON pelvic ring injury pattern (50-60%)
  • LC causes INTERNAL rotation - pelvis narrows (opposite of APC)
  • LC-I = rami + sacral impaction = STABLE
  • LC-II = rami + crescent fracture = VARIABLE stability
  • LC-III = windswept pelvis = UNSTABLE (requires surgery)

Mechanism and Physics:

  • Lateral force causes internal rotation deformity
  • Pelvis volume DECREASES (vs APC which increases)
  • Generally LESS hemorrhage than APC (pelvis closes and tamponades)
  • But DON'T be complacent - can still bleed significantly

Associated Injuries:

  • Head injuries COMMON - same lateral impact mechanism
  • Morel-Lavallee lesion - closed degloving over trochanter
  • Acetabular fractures (same mechanism)
  • Neurological injury with sacral fractures (L5-S1 roots)

Diagnostic Points:

  • CT scan is MANDATORY for all pelvic ring injuries
  • Sacral impaction often OCCULT on X-ray - need CT
  • Look for crescent fracture on CT (LC-II)
  • Always check contralateral side (don't miss LC-III)
  • MRI for Morel-Lavallee lesion if suspected

Treatment Principles:

  • LC-I: Conservative in vast majority (over 90%)
  • LC-II: Assess stability - may need fixation
  • LC-III: Surgical fixation REQUIRED
  • Pelvic binder less effective for LC (pelvis already closed)
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated for LC-I
  • Protected weight-bearing 6 weeks for LC-II/III post-surgery

Complications to Know:

  • DVT/PE risk HIGH - prophylaxis critical
  • Morel-Lavallee can delay surgery or cause infection
  • Neurological injury with Zone 2/3 sacral fractures
  • SI joint arthritis long-term
  • Malunion more common than non-union

Common Exam Traps:

  • Confusing LC with APC (LC = internal rotation, APC = external rotation)
  • Missing sacral impaction on X-ray (need CT)
  • Not recognizing LC-III (check both sides)
  • Thinking pelvic binder helps LC (actually may worsen internal rotation)
  • Assuming LC injuries don't bleed (they can, just less than APC)

Key Numbers:

  • 50-60% = proportion of all pelvic ring injuries that are LC
  • 70% = proportion of LC injuries that are LC-I
  • 90% = proportion of LC-I that return to full function
  • 6 weeks = typical protected weight-bearing period post-surgery
  • 8-12 weeks = typical union time

Examiner Favorites:

  • "What is the most common pelvic ring injury?" = Lateral compression
  • "How does the pelvis deform in LC?" = Internal rotation, pelvis narrows
  • "Why do LC injuries bleed less?" = Pelvis closes, tamponades bleeding
  • "What must you look for on CT in LC?" = Sacral impaction/crescent fracture
  • "When does LC-I need surgery?" = Rarely - usually conservative

LC vs APC

Q: How do you differentiate LC from APC injuries clinically and radiologically? A: LC = Lateral force causing INTERNAL rotation with pelvis narrowing. APC = Anteroposterior force causing EXTERNAL rotation with pelvis opening. LC has LESS bleeding than APC because the pelvis closes and tamponades. On X-ray, LC shows rami fractures with sacral impaction, APC shows symphysis widening.

Sacral Fractures on Imaging

Q: Why is CT mandatory in suspected LC pelvic injuries? A: Sacral impaction fractures in LC-I are often OCCULT on plain X-rays and easily missed. CT is mandatory to identify the posterior injury, classify the pattern accurately, and guide treatment decisions. Never rely on X-ray alone for pelvic ring injuries.

LC-I Management

Q: When does LC-I require surgical fixation? A: LC-I injuries are stable and rarely need surgery (under 10%). Over 90% can be safely managed conservatively with excellent outcomes. Indications for surgery include clinical instability on examination, polytrauma requiring early mobilization, or significant displacement causing pelvic deformity.

Morel-Lavallee Recognition

Q: What is a Morel-Lavallee lesion and why is it important? A: Closed internal degloving injury over the greater trochanter caused by the same lateral shearing force as LC injury. Creates large fluid collection between subcutaneous fat and fascia. Must identify with MRI before surgery to prevent wound complications, infection, and surgical failure.

Associated Head Injury

Q: What associated injury must you screen for in LC pelvic fractures? A: Head injury is very common with LC mechanism because the same lateral impact that hits the pelvis also impacts the head. Always perform thorough neurological assessment and maintain high index of suspicion for intracranial injury. Order head CT liberally.

LC-III Diagnosis

Q: What defines an LC-III injury and why is it important? A: LC-III is "windswept pelvis" - LC pattern on one side with contralateral APC pattern. This is rotationally UNSTABLE (unlike LC-I and LC-II) and requires surgical fixation. Don't miss it by failing to check the contralateral side - always assess both hemipelves carefully.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia

Lateral compression pelvic injuries are the most common pelvic ring injury pattern in Australia, consistent with international data. Motor vehicle accidents (particularly T-bone collisions) and pedestrian strikes account for the majority of cases. Rural and remote areas have higher rates of high-energy trauma due to higher speed limits and longer transport times.

Trauma Systems

Major trauma centers in Australian capital cities have dedicated pelvic trauma protocols including 24/7 access to angiography and experienced pelvic surgeons. The Victorian State Trauma System and NSW Trauma Network have demonstrated improved outcomes through early identification and appropriate triage of pelvic injuries. Pre-hospital application of pelvic binders by ambulance services is now standard practice.

Treatment Access

Percutaneous SI screw fixation is the standard of care for unstable LC injuries in tertiary trauma centers. Regional centers may require patient transfer for definitive fixation. Telemedicine consultations allow rural surgeons to manage stable LC-I injuries conservatively with specialist oversight, avoiding unnecessary transfers.

Rehabilitation and Return to Work

Australian patients have access to comprehensive rehabilitation through public and private systems. Workers' compensation schemes in each state provide support for injured workers, including allied health and vocational rehabilitation. Rural patients may require temporary relocation for intensive rehabilitation at metropolitan centers.

DVT Prophylaxis

Australian guidelines follow international best practice for VTE prophylaxis in pelvic fractures. LMWH (enoxaparin) is most commonly used, with dosing adjusted for renal function. Extended prophylaxis (6-12 weeks) is standard for high-risk pelvic injuries. Public hospital pharmacies provide subsidized LMWH for discharge prescriptions.

Long-Term Outcomes

Australian outcome data shows similar results to international series, with excellent outcomes for LC-I injuries treated conservatively. National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) support is available for patients with permanent disability from severe pelvic injuries, providing ongoing therapy and equipment needs.

Lateral Compression Pelvic Injuries - Exam Quick Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

DEFINITION

  • •Most common pelvic ring injury (50-60%)
  • •Lateral force causes INTERNAL rotation
  • •Pelvis NARROWS (vs APC which opens)
  • •Named by direction of FORCE, not displacement

CLASSIFICATION

  • •LC-I: Rami + sacral impaction (STABLE)
  • •LC-II: Rami + crescent fracture (VARIABLE)
  • •LC-III: Ipsi LC + contra APC = UNSTABLE
  • •LC-III = windswept pelvis

KEY ASSOCIATIONS

  • •Head injuries (same lateral mechanism)
  • •Morel-Lavallee lesion (closed degloving)
  • •Sacral fractures with nerve injury
  • •Acetabular fractures

IMAGING

  • •AP pelvis first
  • •CT MANDATORY to classify
  • •Look for sacral impaction (often occult)
  • •MRI for Morel-Lavallee lesion

MANAGEMENT

  • •LC-I: Usually conservative
  • •LC-II: Assess stability, may need fixation
  • •LC-III: Surgical fixation required
  • •Less hemorrhage than APC but don't be complacent
Quick Stats
Reading Time101 min
Related Topics

Anteroposterior Compression (APC) Pelvic Injuries

Both Column Acetabular Fractures

Open Book Pelvic Injuries

Sacral Fractures