Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Children

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Children

Comprehensive guide to pediatric medial epicondyle fractures - elbow dislocation association, fragment entrapment, classification, ORIF indications, and ulnar nerve considerations

complete
Updated: 2024-12-19
High Yield Overview

MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES

Pediatric Elbow | Avulsion Fracture | Elbow Dislocation | Fragment Entrapment | ORIF Indications

9-14 yrsPeak age at injury
50%Associated with elbow dislocation
15-18%Fragment incarceration rate
greater than 5mmDisplacement threshold for surgery

CLASSIFICATION BY DISPLACEMENT

Minimally displaced
PatternLess than 5mm displacement
TreatmentImmobilization, early ROM
Displaced
Pattern5-10mm displacement
TreatmentConsider ORIF, especially athletes
Incarcerated
PatternFragment in joint
TreatmentORIF mandatory

Critical Must-Knows

  • Ossification order CRITOL: Capitellum, Radial head, Internal (medial) epicondyle, Trochlea, Olecranon, Lateral (external) epicondyle
  • Association with elbow dislocation: 50% of medial epicondyle fractures occur with elbow dislocation - fragment may become entrapped in joint
  • Ulnar nerve at risk: Runs posterior to medial epicondyle - 10-16% ulnar nerve symptoms
  • Surgery indications: Intra-articular fragment, greater than 5mm displacement (relative, absolute controversial), high-level throwing athlete, ulnar nerve dysfunction

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Compare to contralateral elbow - medial epicondyle appears at age 5-7, fuses at 15-17
  • "
    If trochlea visible but NO medial epicondyle seen, it is entrapped in joint
  • "
    Stress X-rays may show valgus instability from avulsed UCL origin
  • "
    Always assess ulnar nerve function pre-operatively

Critical Medial Epicondyle Exam Points

CRITOL Ossification

Elbow ossification sequence: Capitellum (1yr), Radial head (3yr), Internal (medial) epicondyle (5yr), Trochlea (7yr), Olecranon (9yr), Lateral epicondyle (11yr). If trochlea is present but medial epicondyle is not visible, the fragment is INCARCERATED IN THE JOINT.

Fragment Incarceration

15-18% of medial epicondyle fractures have fragment entrapment. Associated with elbow dislocation when joint reduces. Look for fragment in ulnohumeral joint space on AP X-ray. Often at posteromedial aspect. Incarcerated fragment = mandatory ORIF.

Ulnar Nerve

Ulnar nerve runs posterior to medial epicondyle. 10-16% have ulnar nerve symptoms at presentation. Assess intrinsic function (first dorsal interosseous, little finger abduction) and sensation (ulnar 1.5 digits). Nerve commonly subluxates over epicondyle in throwing athletes.

Surgery Indications

Absolute: Incarcerated fragment, open fracture. Relative: Displacement greater than 5mm (controversial), high-level throwing athlete, ulnar nerve dysfunction, valgus instability. Many advocate for conservative treatment up to 10-15mm displacement with good outcomes.

Quick Decision Guide - Medial Epicondyle Fractures

FeatureConservativeConsider ORIFMandatory ORIF
DisplacementLess than 5mm5-10mmIncarcerated
Joint congruityCongruentCongruentFragment in joint
Patient factorsNon-throwing athleteHigh-level throwerAny
Nerve statusNormalSymptomsDysfunction
ManagementSplint 1-2 weeks, early ROMORIF with screw or K-wiresExtraction + ORIF
Mnemonic

CRITOLCRITOL - Elbow Ossification Order

C
Capitellum
1 year
R
Radial head
3 years
I
Internal (medial) epicondyle
5 years
T
Trochlea
7 years
O
Olecranon
9 years
L
Lateral (external) epicondyle
11 years

Memory Hook:CRITOL: Capitellum 1, Radial head 3, Internal epicondyle 5, Trochlea 7, Olecranon 9, Lateral epi 11 (odd years 1-3-5-7-9-11).

Mnemonic

TRAPTRAP - Fragment Incarceration Signs

T
Trochlea visible but no medial epicondyle
It has moved into joint
R
Reduced dislocation with missing fragment
Went into joint during reduction
A
Asymmetry on X-ray
Widened ulnohumeral joint medially
P
Pain with ROM after "reduction"
Mechanical block from fragment

Memory Hook:Don't fall into the TRAP - look for the incarcerated fragment!

Mnemonic

SPORTSPORT - Surgery Considerations

S
Significant displacement (greater than 5mm)
Relative indication
P
Pitcher / throwing athlete
UCL origin important for valgus stress
O
Open fracture
Absolute indication
R
Reduced with fragment in joint
Incarceration = mandatory ORIF
T
Traction on ulnar nerve
Nerve symptoms warrant exploration

Memory Hook:SPORT injuries in young athletes need careful assessment for surgical indications.

Mnemonic

INVUSurgical Indications

I
Incarcerated fragment
Absolute indication - fragment in joint
N
Nerve injury (ulnar)
Exploration indicated if persistent
V
Valgus instability
Unstable elbow after reduction
U
Ulnar collateral ligament disruption
Throwing athletes need stability

Memory Hook:INVU = I eNVU fixing these - clear surgical indications!

Mnemonic

MISSX-ray Signs of Incarceration

M
Missing medial epicondyle
Cannot be seen in normal position
I
Increased medial joint space
Widened clear space
S
Shadow in joint
Fragment visible in articular space
S
Soft tissue swelling medial
Associated findings

Memory Hook:Don't MISS the incarcerated fragment!

Overview and Epidemiology

Medial epicondyle fractures are avulsion injuries occurring through the apophysis of the medial epicondyle. The flexor-pronator mass and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) originate here, and traction through these structures causes the avulsion during falls or throwing.

Epidemiology:

  • Peak incidence 9-14 years (during apophyseal stage before fusion)
  • More common in males (75%)
  • 11-20% of pediatric elbow fractures
  • 50% associated with elbow dislocation
  • Common in throwing sports (baseball, cricket, javelin)

Mechanism of Injury

Two mechanisms: (1) Direct valgus stress to extended elbow with sudden muscle contraction (throwing). (2) Elbow dislocation - posterolateral force avulses epicondyle via UCL and flexor-pronator traction. During reduction of dislocation, the fragment may become trapped in the joint.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Medial Epicondyle Anatomy

Key Anatomical Relationships

StructureAttachment/CourseClinical Relevance
Flexor-pronator massOriginates from medial epicondyleTraction causes avulsion fracture
UCL (anterior bundle)Originates from medial epicondyleValgus stability, thrower's elbow
Ulnar nervePosterior to medial epicondyle in cubital tunnelAt risk in fracture and surgery
Medial epicondyle apophysisSeparate ossification centerAppears age 5-7, fuses 15-17

Ossification Centers

CRITOL Sequence

  • Capitellum: 1 year
  • Radial head: 3 years
  • Internal (medial) epicondyle: 5 years
  • Trochlea: 7 years
  • Olecranon: 9 years
  • Lateral epicondyle: 11 years
  • Ages are approximate; females earlier

Clinical Application

  • Medial epicondyle appears BEFORE trochlea
  • If trochlea visible but no medial epicondyle → fragment is in joint (incarcerated)
  • Always compare to contralateral elbow
  • Fusion occurs 15-17 years

The Phantom Medial Epicondyle

If you see trochlea ossification but cannot identify the medial epicondyle, it must be INCARCERATED IN THE JOINT. Per CRITOL, the medial epicondyle (I) appears before the trochlea (T). This is a common exam question and missed diagnosis.

Classification Systems

Classification by Displacement

There is no universally accepted classification. Commonly described by displacement:

CategoryDisplacementManagement Tendency
Type IMinimally displaced (less than 5mm)Conservative
Type IIModerately displaced (5-10mm)Controversial - varies by patient factors
Type IIISeverely displaced (greater than 10mm)Often surgical, but some advocate conservative
Type IVIncarcerated in jointMandatory ORIF

Note: The 5mm threshold has been historically used for surgical decision-making but is increasingly controversial. Many centers report good outcomes with conservative treatment up to 10-15mm.

Associated Injury Classification

Describing the clinical context is important:

  • Isolated: Medial epicondyle fracture only
  • With elbow dislocation: 50% of cases - higher risk of incarceration
  • With other elbow fracture: Olecranon, coronoid, radial head/neck
AssociationFrequencySignificance
Elbow dislocation50%Risk of fragment incarceration
Ulnar nerve symptoms10-16%Consider nerve exploration
Coronoid fractureLess commonContributes to instability

Associated elbow dislocation affects outcomes and treatment decisions.

Clinical Assessment

Systematic Examination

Step 1History
  • Mechanism: Fall on outstretched hand, elbow dislocation event, throwing injury
  • Immediate symptoms: Pain, swelling, inability to flex wrist/fingers
  • Sport involvement: Level of throwing activity (baseball, cricket)
  • Hand dominance: Affects treatment decisions
Step 2Inspection
  • Swelling: Medial elbow
  • Ecchymosis: Medial soft tissues
  • Deformity: If associated dislocation
  • Open wound: Exclude open fracture
Step 3Palpation
  • Medial epicondyle tenderness: Point tenderness over avulsed fragment
  • Gap or defect: May feel defect if displaced
  • Crepitus: Avoid excessive manipulation
Step 4Neurovascular Assessment
  • ULNAR NERVE - Critical!
  • Motor: First dorsal interosseous (finger abduction), hypothenar
  • Sensory: Little finger and ulnar half of ring finger
  • Document function BEFORE any intervention
  • Also assess median and radial nerve
  • Vascular: Pulse, capillary refill, color

Document Ulnar Nerve Function

Always document ulnar nerve function pre-operatively. The nerve lies immediately posterior to the medial epicondyle. 10-16% have ulnar nerve symptoms at presentation. Post-operative neuropraxia may be iatrogenic or from the injury - baseline documentation is medicolegally important.

Investigations

Clinical Imaging

AP and lateral elbow radiographs showing medial epicondyle fracture with elbow dislocation
Click to expand
AP and lateral elbow radiographs demonstrating a pediatric biepicondylar fracture-dislocation. Note the displaced medial epicondyle fragment and associated elbow dislocation. The lateral view shows loss of normal elbow alignment. When evaluating pediatric elbows, compare to the contralateral side and apply the CRITOL sequence - if the trochlea is visible but the medial epicondyle is not in its normal position, consider fragment incarceration in the joint.Credit: Queensland Health / PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0
Annotated elbow radiographs showing fracture fragments
Click to expand
Annotated AP and lateral elbow radiographs demonstrating biepicondylar fracture. Labels I, II, and III indicate the various fracture fragments including the medial epicondyle. This teaching image illustrates how to systematically evaluate pediatric elbow injuries and identify all ossification centers. Panel B shows the reduced position on lateral view.Credit: PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0
Complete case showing medial epicondyle fracture treatment and outcome
Click to expand
Complete pediatric medial epicondyle fracture case. Panels A-B: Preoperative AP radiographs showing displaced fracture. Panel C: Clinical appearance with elbow swelling. Panel D: Postoperative X-ray demonstrating K-wire fixation achieving anatomic reduction. Panels E-F: Clinical outcome at follow-up showing full elbow ROM including flexion and extension. This case demonstrates the excellent functional outcomes achievable with appropriate surgical management when indicated.Credit: PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0

Radiographic Assessment

Elbow X-rays in two planes are usually sufficient. Always compare to the contralateral side in children, especially if ossification status is uncertain. If the medial epicondyle is not in its normal position, look for it in the joint.

Investigation Modalities

InvestigationWhen UsedWhat to Look For
AP/Lateral elbow X-raysAll suspected fracturesFragment position, joint congruity, incarceration
Comparison viewsUncertainty about ossificationNormal appearance of contralateral elbow
Oblique viewsFurther characterizationFragment position, articular involvement
Stress X-rays (valgus)Chronic/old injury, instability assessmentWidening of medial joint space (UCL laxity)
CT scanComplex injury, fragment localizationPrecise fragment position if uncertain on X-ray
MRIChronic valgus instability, UCL injuryUCL integrity, soft tissue injury

Key Radiographic Signs of Incarceration:

  • Widening of ulnohumeral joint space on AP
  • Ossific density in the joint space (look carefully)
  • Medial epicondyle ossification center not in normal position
  • Use CRITOL - if trochlea is visible, medial epicondyle should be too

Management Algorithm

Non-Operative Management

Indications:

  • Minimally displaced fractures (less than 5mm)
  • No fragment incarceration
  • Non-throwing athlete or low-demand patient
  • Intact ulnar nerve function
  • Joint congruent

Protocol:

  1. Above-elbow splint or cast with elbow at 90°, forearm neutral
  2. Duration: 1-2 weeks immobilization
  3. Then begin progressive ROM exercises
  4. Avoid valgus stress for 6 weeks
  5. Return to throwing: 8-12 weeks, gradual progression

Expected Outcomes:

  • Good functional outcomes in most cases
  • Fibrous union common (not bony) but this is functionally acceptable
  • Low rates of symptomatic non-union

Even up to 10-15mm displacement, some centers report excellent outcomes with conservative treatment.

Operative Management

Absolute Indications:

  • Incarcerated fragment in joint (mandatory)
  • Open fracture

Relative Indications:

  • Displacement greater than 5mm (controversial - some use 10mm)
  • High-level throwing athlete
  • Ulnar nerve dysfunction
  • Valgus instability
  • Associated elbow instability

Surgical Options:

TechniqueDescriptionWhen Used
ORIF with screwCannulated screw fixation (4.0-4.5mm)Older children with adequate fragment size
ORIF with K-wiresSmooth K-wire fixationYounger children, small fragment
Suture fixationTrans-osseous suture or suture anchorSmall or comminuted fragment
Fragment excisionExcision with muscle/ligament repairChronic non-union, small fragment (rarely primary)

Post-operative:

  • Splint for 2-4 weeks
  • Progressive ROM
  • Avoid valgus stress 6-8 weeks
  • Return to throwing 3-4 months

Surgery provides anatomic restoration but has similar long-term outcomes to conservative treatment in many studies.

Surgical Technique

ORIF with Cannulated Screw

Standard technique for pediatric medial epicondyle fractures with adequate fragment size.

Surgical Steps

Step 1Positioning
  • Supine with arm on arm board
  • Shoulder externally rotated, elbow flexed
  • Tourniquet on upper arm (optional)
Step 2Approach
  • Medial incision centered over epicondyle
  • Careful dissection - identify and protect ulnar nerve
  • Ulnar nerve usually left in situ unless subluxating
Step 3Reduction
  • If incarcerated: extract fragment from joint before reduction
  • Reduce fragment anatomically to epicondyle bed
  • Hold with reduction clamp or K-wire
Step 4Fixation
  • Place guide wire for cannulated screw (4.0 or 4.5mm)
  • Measure and insert partially threaded screw
  • Achieve compression but avoid over-compression
  • Alternatively, use two divergent K-wires
Step 5Assessment
  • Check reduction and fixation with imaging
  • Test elbow ROM - no mechanical block
  • Verify ulnar nerve function if able

Technical Points:

  • Screw should be parallel or slightly posterior to avoid articular surface
  • Partially threaded screw for compression
  • Washer optional if bone is soft
  • K-wires may be preferred in younger children or small fragments

Ulnar nerve transposition is rarely needed but may be done if nerve is subluxating or injured.

Extraction of Incarcerated Fragment

Mandatory step before ORIF when fragment is trapped in joint.

Technique:

  1. Medial approach with gentle distraction of joint
  2. Identify fragment in ulnohumeral joint (usually posteromedial)
  3. Extract fragment with soft tissue attachments intact (flexor-pronator, UCL)
  4. Irrigate joint thoroughly
  5. Reduce fragment to epicondyle bed
  6. Fix with screw or K-wires as above

Key Points:

  • Fragment may have periosteal attachments to bone bed
  • Do not use lateral approach through joint - risks iatrogenic injury
  • If fragment is comminuted or very small, excision with soft tissue repair may be needed (rare)

Post-extraction, proceed to standard ORIF technique.

Complications

Complications of Medial Epicondyle Fractures

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Ulnar nerve injury10-16% (injury-related or iatrogenic)Careful identification, consider transposition if at risk
Non-union/fibrous unionVariable - often asymptomaticFibrous union usually functional; ORIF for symptoms
StiffnessCommon, usually mildEarly ROM, physical therapy
Valgus instabilityRare if healedORIF in throwing athletes to restore UCL origin
Missed incarcerationPotentially seriousApply CRITOL, comparison X-rays, high index of suspicion
Hardware prominenceIf screws usedMay need removal after healing

Non-union vs Fibrous Union

Fibrous union is common (up to 50%) and usually asymptomatic. The flexor-pronator mass and UCL origin function well despite lack of bony union. Symptomatic non-union causing pain or instability is rare and may require late ORIF or excision with soft tissue repair.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-ORIF Protocol

ImmobilizationWeek 0-2
  • Posterior splint with elbow at 90°
  • Gentle finger and wrist ROM
  • Wound care
  • Sling for comfort
Early MotionWeeks 2-4
  • Remove splint, begin elbow ROM
  • Active-assisted flexion/extension
  • Avoid valgus stress
  • Progress as tolerated
Progressive ROMWeeks 4-6
  • Aim for full ROM
  • Begin light strengthening
  • Continue avoiding valgus stress
  • May remove K-wires at 4-6 weeks if used
StrengtheningWeeks 6-12
  • Progressive resistance exercises
  • Sport-specific conditioning
  • Gradual return to non-throwing activities
Return to Throwing3-4 months
  • Begin graduated throwing program
  • Interval throwing protocol
  • Full return when painless and full strength

Conservative Treatment Rehabilitation:

  • Shorter immobilization (1-2 weeks)
  • Earlier ROM initiation
  • Progress as tolerated
  • Avoid valgus stress for 6 weeks

Outcomes

Conservative Treatment:

  • Excellent functional outcomes in most cases
  • Fibrous union common but usually asymptomatic
  • May have slight loss of extension (usually not clinically significant)
  • Return to sport in 6-12 weeks

Surgical Treatment:

  • Anatomic union achieved
  • Similar long-term outcomes to conservative in many studies
  • May be preferred for high-level throwing athletes
  • Hardware removal occasionally needed

Long-term:

  • Most patients return to full activity
  • Late valgus instability rare
  • Osteoarthritic changes uncommon

Evidence Base

Operative vs Non-operative Treatment

4
Pathy R et al • J Pediatr Orthop (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of outcomes
  • Similar functional outcomes for operative and non-operative management
  • Non-union rate higher non-operatively but rarely symptomatic
  • Surgery preferred for throwers and incarcerated fragments
Clinical Implication: Both treatments are acceptable for most fractures. Surgical indications should be individualized based on patient activity level and fragment position.
Limitation: Retrospective studies, selection bias.

Displacement Threshold for Surgery

4
Lawrence JTR et al • J Pediatr Orthop (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Traditional 5mm threshold questioned
  • Good outcomes reported with conservative treatment up to 10-15mm
  • Absolute displacement threshold not supported by literature
  • Patient factors more important than displacement alone
Clinical Implication: The 5mm rule should not be applied rigidly. Consider patient factors such as throwing athlete status and activity demands.
Limitation: Retrospective, variable follow-up.

Ulnar Nerve in Medial Epicondyle Fractures

4
Fowles JV et al • J Bone Joint Surg Br (1984)
Key Findings:
  • Ulnar nerve symptoms in 10-16%
  • Most resolve spontaneously
  • Surgical exploration if progressive or severe
  • Pre-operative documentation important
Clinical Implication: Document ulnar nerve function before any treatment. Most symptoms resolve, but persistent dysfunction may warrant exploration.
Limitation: Historical series.

Fibrous Union Outcomes

4
Farsetti P et al • J Pediatr Orthop (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term follow-up of conservative treatment
  • Fibrous union common but rarely symptomatic
  • Excellent functional outcomes despite radiographic non-union
  • Late instability rare
Clinical Implication: Fibrous union should not be considered a treatment failure. Symptomatic non-union is the concern, not radiographic appearance.
Limitation: Single center, variable follow-up.

Throwing Athletes

5
Gottschalk HP et al • Orthop Clin North Am (2016)
Key Findings:
  • UCL origin important for valgus stability
  • Throwing creates high valgus stress
  • Lower threshold for surgery in elite throwers
  • Return to throwing at 3-4 months post-op
Clinical Implication: High-level throwing athletes may benefit from surgical fixation to restore UCL origin anatomy and stability.
Limitation: Expert opinion, variable definitions of 'elite' athlete.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 12-year-old boy fell from a trampoline onto his outstretched left arm. X-rays show a 3mm displaced medial epicondyle fracture. The elbow is congruent and ulnar nerve function is intact."

VIVA Q&A
Q1:Describe your initial assessment and the key radiographic findings to evaluate.
I would assess clinically for swelling, tenderness over the medial epicondyle, and importantly perform a thorough neurovascular examination, especially the ulnar nerve - testing intrinsic muscle function (first dorsal interosseous, finger abduction) and sensation in the ulnar 1.5 digits. Radiographically, on the AP view I would assess displacement of the medial epicondyle fragment (measuring in millimeters), confirm joint congruity (ensure fragment is NOT in the joint space), and look for any other fractures. Using CRITOL, I would confirm the medial epicondyle ossification center is visible - if trochlea is visible but medial epicondyle is not, I would suspect joint incarceration. I would compare to the contralateral elbow if any uncertainty.
Q2:How would you manage this fracture?
Given the fracture is minimally displaced (3mm, less than 5mm threshold), the joint is congruent with no incarceration, and the ulnar nerve is intact, I would manage this conservatively. My treatment would be: (1) Above-elbow splint or cast with elbow at 90 degrees, forearm in neutral. (2) Immobilization for 1-2 weeks to allow initial healing and symptom control. (3) Then transition to a sling and begin progressive range of motion exercises. (4) Avoid valgus stress to the elbow for 6 weeks. (5) Return to full activities at 6-8 weeks as pain allows. I would counsel that fibrous union is common and acceptable, and that outcomes with conservative treatment are excellent for this degree of displacement.
Q3:What would change your management?
I would consider surgical intervention if: (1) Fragment incarceration in the joint - this is an absolute indication for surgery. (2) Significant displacement greater than 5mm, particularly if greater than 10mm - though this is controversial. (3) The patient is a high-level throwing athlete (baseball pitcher, cricket bowler) where restoring the UCL origin anatomy may be important for valgus stability. (4) Ulnar nerve dysfunction - I would explore the nerve and fix the fracture. (5) Associated elbow instability. (6) Open fracture. For this patient, I would ask about sporting activities - if he is an elite thrower, I would discuss the relative indications for surgery even with minimal displacement.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
3mm displacement = conservative treatment
Always document ulnar nerve function
Check joint congruity - is fragment in joint?
Apply CRITOL - medial epicondyle before trochlea
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing an incarcerated fragment
✗Not documenting ulnar nerve status
✗Rigidly applying 5mm rule without patient factors
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is CRITOL and why is it important?"
"How would you manage if the patient was a high-level pitcher?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"An 11-year-old girl had an elbow dislocation reduced in the emergency department. Post-reduction X-ray shows a congruent elbow but the 'medial epicondyle' appears smaller than expected and there is a bony density in the ulnohumeral joint space."

VIVA Q&A
Q1:What is your concern and how would you confirm the diagnosis?
My main concern is incarceration of the medial epicondyle fragment within the ulnohumeral joint. This occurs in 15-18% of medial epicondyle fractures, especially those associated with elbow dislocation. The fragment can become trapped during the reduction. To confirm: (1) I would carefully examine the AP X-ray for a bony density in the joint space, typically at the posteromedial aspect. (2) I would apply CRITOL - at age 11, the trochlea should be ossified (appears at age 7). If I can see trochlea but the medial epicondyle is not in its normal position, it is incarcerated. (3) I would obtain comparison views of the contralateral elbow. (4) If any doubt, CT scan would precisely localize the fragment. The clinical scenario - elbow dislocation with 'smaller' epicondyle and bony density in joint - is classic for incarceration.
Q2:Confirm it is incarcerated. What is your management?
An incarcerated fragment is a mandatory indication for operative management - this is an absolute surgical indication regardless of fragment size or patient activity level. My management: (1) Obtain informed consent for ORIF with fragment extraction. (2) Approach via medial incision, carefully identifying and protecting the ulnar nerve. (3) Apply gentle distraction to the joint and identify the incarcerated fragment, usually posteromedial. (4) Extract the fragment carefully, maintaining its periosteal attachments to the flexor-pronator mass and UCL. (5) Irrigate the joint thoroughly. (6) Reduce the fragment anatomically to its epicondylar bed. (7) Fix with cannulated screw (if adequate size) or K-wires. (8) Confirm reduction and joint congruity with imaging. (9) Post-op: splint 2-4 weeks, then progressive ROM.
Q3:Post-operatively the patient has weak finger abduction and numbness in the little finger. How do you proceed?
This indicates ulnar nerve dysfunction. First, I would determine if this is new or was present pre-operatively (emphasizing the importance of documentation). If new, my approach: (1) Reassure that post-operative ulnar nerve symptoms are often neuropraxic and usually recover. (2) Document the examination thoroughly - motor testing of first dorsal interosseous, hypothenar muscles, and sensory testing of ulnar 1.5 digits. (3) Observation is initial management for neuropraxia. (4) Follow-up at 2-4 weeks to assess recovery. (5) If no improvement by 6 weeks, consider EMG/NCS to assess the nerve. (6) If there is complete motor loss, dense sensory loss, or a concern that the nerve is entrapped under hardware, I would consider early re-exploration to decompress the nerve. Most cases recover spontaneously. Transposition may be considered during exploration if indicated.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Incarceration = mandatory surgery
Apply CRITOL - epicondyle before trochlea
Extract fragment via medial approach
Ulnar nerve neuropraxia often recovers
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing the incarcerated fragment on post-reduction X-ray
✗Not applying CRITOL to identify missing epicondyle
✗Panicking about post-op ulnar nerve symptoms
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the fragment is comminuted and cannot be fixed?"
"When would you do an ulnar nerve transposition?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

EXAMINER

"A 14-year-old elite baseball pitcher presents with medial elbow pain after a throwing injury. X-rays show an 8mm displaced medial epicondyle fracture. The joint is congruent and ulnar nerve is intact."

VIVA Q&A
Q1:How does the patient being a high-level throwing athlete affect your decision-making?
The patient being an elite baseball pitcher significantly influences my decision-making, lowering my threshold for surgical intervention. Key considerations: (1) The medial epicondyle is the origin of the UCL anterior bundle, which is the primary restraint to valgus stress. Pitching creates enormous valgus forces at the elbow. (2) Even though the 8mm displacement is in the 5-10mm 'controversial' zone, I would lean toward surgical fixation for this patient. (3) Fibrous union, which is acceptable for non-throwers, may not provide the valgus stability needed for high-level pitching. (4) There may be an associated UCL injury to consider. I would discuss with the patient and family that while conservative treatment often works, surgical fixation offers the best chance of restoring anatomic stability for return to elite throwing. This is a shared decision.
Q2:The family opts for surgery. Describe your operative plan.
My operative plan: (1) Positioning: Supine with arm on arm board, tourniquet optional. (2) Approach: Medial incision over epicondyle, identify and protect ulnar nerve throughout. (3) Reduction: Clear fracture bed, reduce fragment anatomically. (4) Fixation: I would use a single cannulated screw (4.0-4.5mm), as this provides good compression and stability. Partially threaded screw to achieve compression. Alternative is divergent K-wires if fragment is small. (5) Check intra-operatively: Confirm reduction on imaging, test elbow ROM for mechanical block, ensure ulnar nerve lies in its groove without subluxation. (6) Assess UCL: If there is concern about UCL integrity, I may consider MRI post-operatively or at follow-up if symptoms persist. (7) Closure and splint at 90 degrees. Post-op: Splint for 2 weeks, then ROM. Avoid valgus stress for 6-8 weeks. Return to throwing at 3-4 months with a graduated throwing program.
Q3:At 4 months post-op, he has full ROM and strength but complains of medial elbow pain with throwing. Screw is in place and healed. What now?
Persistent medial elbow pain after healed medial epicondyle fracture in a thrower raises concern for: (1) UCL insufficiency - either injury at the time of fracture or subsequent attritional injury. (2) Ulnar neuritis/nerve irritation. (3) Medial epicondylitis (flexor-pronator strain). (4) Hardware irritation. My assessment: (1) Clinical examination for UCL laxity (valgus stress test, moving valgus stress test), ulnar nerve Tinel sign, and flexor-pronator tenderness. (2) If concern for UCL injury, I would order an MRI with or without arthrogram to assess ligament integrity. (3) Manage initially with rest, anti-inflammatories, and possibly a period of no throwing. (4) If UCL injury confirmed, options include continued conservative treatment (PRP, rest) or UCL reconstruction (Tommy John surgery) if high-grade tear and elite athlete. (5) Consider hardware removal if the screw is prominent or irritating soft tissues.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Elite thrower = lower threshold for ORIF
UCL origin at medial epicondyle critical for valgus stability
Return to throwing at 3-4 months with graduated program
Persistent pain: consider UCL injury, hardware, nerve
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating elite thrower same as recreational athlete
✗Missing associated UCL injury
✗Returning to throwing too early
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is Tommy John surgery?"
"How do you distinguish UCL injury from medial epicondylitis?"

MCQ Practice Points

CRITOL Sequence

Q: In what order do the elbow ossification centers appear? A: CRITOL - Capitellum (1yr), Radial head (3yr), Internal (medial) epicondyle (5yr), Trochlea (7yr), Olecranon (9yr), Lateral epicondyle (11yr).

Incarceration Sign

Q: How can you identify an incarcerated medial epicondyle fragment on X-ray? A: If the trochlea is visible but the medial epicondyle is NOT seen in its normal position (per CRITOL, medial epicondyle ossifies before trochlea), the fragment is incarcerated in the joint.

Nerve at Risk

Q: Which nerve is at risk in medial epicondyle fractures? A: The ulnar nerve. It runs posterior to the medial epicondyle in the cubital tunnel. 10-16% have ulnar nerve symptoms at presentation.

Absolute Surgical Indication

Q: What is an absolute indication for surgery in medial epicondyle fractures? A: Incarcerated fragment in the joint. Also, open fracture.

Medicolegal Considerations

Documentation Points:

  • Pre-operative ulnar nerve examination (critical)
  • Radiographic assessment including comparison views
  • Discussion of treatment options and shared decision-making
  • For athletes: discussion of risks/benefits for throwing

Consent for Surgery:

  • Risk of ulnar nerve injury (pre-existing vs iatrogenic)
  • Non-union (rare with fixation)
  • Stiffness
  • Hardware removal
  • For athletes: timeline for return, no guarantee of return to prior level

Pre-operative Nerve Documentation

The most important medicolegal point is documenting ulnar nerve function BEFORE any intervention. If the patient has post-operative ulnar symptoms and there is no baseline documentation, it is difficult to establish whether the injury was pre-existing or iatrogenic.

Australian Context

Epidemiology:

  • Common pediatric elbow injury in Australia
  • Seen in cricket (bowling), baseball, gymnastics
  • Trampoline injuries increasingly common

Access to Care:

  • Tertiary pediatric orthopaedic services for complex cases
  • Most straightforward fractures managed at regional hospitals
  • Elite athlete management often involves sports medicine multidisciplinary teams

Sport-Specific Considerations:

  • Cricket bowling action creates valgus stress similar to baseball pitching
  • Australian Little League and junior cricket programs have pitch count guidelines
  • Return to sport protocols similar to international standards

High-Yield Exam Summary

CRITOL Sequence

  • •Capitellum 1yr
  • •Radial head 3yr
  • •Internal (medial) epicondyle 5yr
  • •Trochlea 7yr
  • •Olecranon 9yr
  • •Lateral epicondyle 11yr

Key Associations

  • •50% with elbow dislocation
  • •15-18% fragment incarceration
  • •10-16% ulnar nerve symptoms
  • •Flexor-pronator and UCL origin

Incarceration Detection

  • •Trochlea visible, epicondyle missing = in joint
  • •Bony density in ulnohumeral joint space
  • •Post-dislocation reduction - check carefully
  • •Mandates ORIF

Treatment Thresholds

  • •Less than 5mm: Conservative
  • •5-10mm: Controversial, consider patient factors
  • •Incarcerated: Mandatory surgery
  • •Elite thrower: Lower threshold for ORIF

Critical Actions

  • •Document ulnar nerve function pre-op
  • •Compare to contralateral elbow
  • •Look for fragment in joint on post-reduction films
  • •Protect ulnar nerve during surgery
Quick Stats
Reading Time90 min
Related Topics

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Atlantoaxial Instability

Blount Disease (Tibia Vara)

Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy