ORTHOTIC PRESCRIPTION PRINCIPLES
Control | Correct | Compensate | Protect
Orthosis Nomenclature (ISO Standard)
Critical Must-Knows
- Functions: Control (motion), Correct (deformity), Compensate (weakness), Protect (healing)
- Three-point pressure = biomechanical basis of all corrective orthoses
- AFO types: Solid (blocks motion), Hinged (allows DF), Ground-reaction (extends knee)
- FRAFO = Floor Reaction AFO - uses ground reaction force to extend knee
- Spinal orthoses named by levels covered (LSO, TLSO, CTLSO)
Examiner's Pearls
- "Solid AFO for spastic equinus (blocks plantarflexion)
- "Hinged AFO allows tibial progression in stance (better gait)
- "Ground-reaction AFO for crouch gait (knee extension moment)
- "TLSO for thoracolumbar fractures (T9-L3 coverage)
- "Halo vest = only reliable cervical immobilization (greater than 90%)
Critical Orthotic Concepts for Exam
Three-Point Pressure
Foundation of all corrective orthoses. Central corrective force opposed by two counter-forces creates moment arm. Longer lever arm = greater mechanical advantage. Pressure must be distributed over large area to avoid skin breakdown.
AFO Selection
Solid AFO: Blocks all motion - for spasticity, severe instability. Hinged AFO: Allows dorsiflexion - for weak dorsiflexors with intact plantarflexors. Ground-reaction: Creates knee extension - for crouch gait, quad weakness.
TLSO Limitations
TLSO controls T9 to L3 motion effectively. Above T9 requires CTLSO (sternal and clavicular support). Below L3 requires thigh extension for pelvic control. Upper cervical requires halo vest.
Prescription Essentials
Prescription must specify: Diagnosis, joints to control, motion to allow/block, corrective forces needed, material (plastic, metal, carbon fiber), footwear requirements.
At a Glance
Orthoses are externally applied devices used to control, correct, compensate for, or protect musculoskeletal dysfunction. Understanding orthotic prescription is essential for orthopaedic surgeons managing neurological conditions, fractures, deformity correction, and rehabilitation. The fundamental biomechanical principle underlying corrective orthoses is three-point pressure - a central corrective force opposed by two counter-forces creating a moment for correction. Orthoses are named systematically by the joints they cross (AFO, KAFO, TLSO) following ISO 8549 nomenclature. AFO selection depends on the specific gait abnormality: solid AFO blocks spastic plantarflexion, hinged AFO allows controlled dorsiflexion while preventing foot drop, and ground-reaction AFO creates a knee extension moment for crouch gait. Spinal orthoses provide varying degrees of motion restriction based on their extent - LSO controls lumbosacral motion, TLSO extends to thoracolumbar junction, and halo vest provides the most reliable cervical immobilization.
4 CsFunctions of Orthoses
Memory Hook:4 Cs = Control, Correct, Compensate, Protect - the four functions of every orthosis!
Nomenclature and Classification
ISO 8549 Nomenclature
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) established a systematic naming convention for orthoses based on the anatomical region and joints crossed.
Lower Limb Orthoses:
- FO (Foot Orthosis): Insoles, arch supports, metatarsal pads
- AFO (Ankle-Foot Orthosis): Crosses ankle joint, controls foot position
- KAFO (Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis): Extends from thigh to foot, controls knee
- HKAFO (Hip-Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis): Includes hip joint control
- KO (Knee Orthosis): Braces for knee instability, unloading
Upper Limb Orthoses:
- WHO (Wrist-Hand Orthosis): Wrist splints, resting hand orthoses
- EWHO (Elbow-Wrist-Hand Orthosis): Extends to elbow
- SEWHO (Shoulder-Elbow-Wrist-Hand Orthosis): Full upper limb
Spinal Orthoses:
- CO (Cervical Orthosis): Soft/rigid collars
- CTO (Cervicothoracic Orthosis): Extends to upper thorax
- CTLSO (Cervicothoracolumbosacral Orthosis): Full spine control
- TLSO (Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis): Thoracolumbar control
- LSO (Lumbosacral Orthosis): Lower lumbar and sacral control
Functional Classification
Orthosis Classification by Function
Material Classification
Thermoplastics:
- Polypropylene: Most common, heat-moldable, durable
- Low-temperature plastics: Custom-molded at lower temperatures
- Carbon fiber composites: Lightweight, energy-storing (athletic use)
Metal:
- Aluminum: Lightweight, adjustable
- Steel: Heavy-duty, adjustable, traditional KAFOs
- Titanium: Lightweight, strong (specialty applications)
Soft Materials:
- Neoprene: Compression, warmth, proprioceptive feedback
- Foam: Padding, pressure distribution
- Leather: Traditional, breathable, adjustable
Biomechanical Principles
Three-Point Pressure System
The three-point pressure principle is the fundamental biomechanical concept underlying all corrective orthoses. It creates a bending moment to correct or control deformity.
Components:
- Central corrective force: Applied at apex of deformity
- Two counter-forces: Applied proximal and distal to central force
- Moment arm: Distance between forces determines mechanical advantage
Clinical Application:
- Longer lever arms = greater mechanical advantage
- Force distribution over large surface area prevents pressure ulcers
- Soft tissue tolerance limits maximum corrective force
Examples:
- TLSO for scoliosis: Lateral pad at curve apex, counter-pads at iliac crest and axilla
- AFO for equinus: Posterior force at calf, anterior force at tibial crest, foot plate
- Knee orthosis for valgus: Lateral force at knee, medial forces at thigh and calf
Ground Reaction Force Manipulation
Floor Reaction AFO (FRAFO) and ground-reaction orthoses manipulate the ground reaction force vector relative to joint centers.
Principles:
- Ground reaction force (GRF) passes through centre of pressure
- If GRF passes anterior to knee = knee extension moment
- If GRF passes posterior to knee = knee flexion moment
- FRAFO positions GRF anterior to knee, extending the knee in stance
Clinical Application in Crouch Gait:
- Crouch gait = excessive knee flexion in stance (common in cerebral palsy)
- Weak quadriceps cannot maintain knee extension
- FRAFO blocks ankle dorsiflexion, moves GRF anterior
- External knee extension moment compensates for weak quads
Lever Arm Considerations
Long Lever = Greater Control:
- KAFO controls knee better than short KO
- Full-length thigh cuff provides better rotational control
- Trade-off: Increased weight, reduced function
Short Lever = Greater Mobility:
- Supramalleolar AFO (SMAFO) allows more tibial motion
- Short KAFOs allow easier sitting
- Trade-off: Less control of proximal joints
SHGFAFO Selection Guide
Memory Hook:SHGF = Solid, Hinged, Ground-reaction, FRAFO - know which AFO for which gait problem!
Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFOs)
Solid Ankle AFO
Design:
- Rigid plastic shell from below knee to toes
- Blocks all ankle motion (dorsiflexion and plantarflexion)
- Foot plate extends to metatarsal heads (or toes for spasticity)
Biomechanics:
- Prevents ankle plantarflexion in swing (clears foot)
- Prevents ankle dorsiflexion in stance (may limit tibial progression)
- Provides mediolateral ankle stability
Indications:
- Spastic equinus (cerebral palsy, stroke, TBI)
- Severe ankle instability
- Complete foot drop with spasticity
- Fixed equinus contracture (blocks further progression)
Contraindications:
- Intact plantarflexors (blocks push-off power)
- Patients requiring squat or stair climbing
- Skin breakdown risk at calf/anterior tibia
Disadvantages:
- Blocks tibial progression in stance (short step length)
- Reduces push-off power (no plantarflexion for propulsion)
- Compensatory knee hyperextension in mid-stance
Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses (KAFOs)
Indications for KAFO
Knee Instability:
- Quadriceps weakness (polio, muscular dystrophy, SCI)
- Ligamentous instability with neurological impairment
- Knee hyperextension with sensation loss
Knee and Ankle Weakness:
- Combined quadriceps and dorsiflexor weakness
- Flail limb (complete paralysis below knee)
- Myelomeningocele with high-level paralysis
Deformity Control:
- Knee flexion contracture (serial casting with KAFO)
- Genu varum/valgum with weakness
- Post-surgical protection
KAFO Components
Thigh Section:
- Thigh cuff or full-contact thigh shell
- Length determines rotational control
- Medial/lateral uprights connect to knee joint
Knee Joint Options:
- Locked knee: Maximum stability, swing-through gait
- Drop-lock: Manual unlock for sitting, locks automatically
- Offset knee joint: Provides hyperextension stability
- Polycentric knee: More anatomical motion
- Stance-control (SCKAFO): Locks in stance, free in swing
Ankle-Foot Section:
- Usually solid ankle or locked dorsiflexion
- May include adjustable ankle joints
- Stirrup connects to shoe or molded foot section
Stance-Control KAFO (SCKAFO)
Concept:
- Knee joint locks automatically during stance phase
- Unlocks during swing phase for normal knee flexion
- Combines stability with more natural gait pattern
Mechanisms:
- Weight-activated locking (extends with axial load)
- Ankle-motion triggered (ankle DF triggers knee lock)
- Electronic control (sensors detect gait phase)
Benefits over Locked KAFO:
- Improved gait pattern (knee flexion in swing)
- Reduced energy expenditure (10-20% less than locked)
- Better stair climbing and sitting
- Improved cosmesis and patient acceptance
Spinal Orthoses
Cervical Orthoses
Soft Collar:
- Foam collar, minimal motion restriction
- Proprioceptive reminder, comfort, warmth
- Indications: Whiplash, minor strain, psychological support
- Does NOT immobilize - do not use for unstable injuries
Rigid Cervical Collar (Philadelphia, Aspen, Miami J):
- Two-piece (anterior/posterior) rigid plastic
- Restricts 70-80% flexion/extension, 50% rotation
- Indications: Stable cervical fractures, post-operative, transport
- Does NOT adequately immobilize C0-C2 or C7-T1
Cervicothoracic Orthosis (CTO):
- Collar with thoracic extension (sternal and posterior plates)
- Improved control of lower cervical spine (C5-T1)
- Indications: Lower cervical fractures, post-fusion
- Examples: SOMI brace, Minerva orthosis
Halo Vest:
- Ring fixed to skull with 4 pins, connected to vest
- Most restrictive cervical orthosis available
- Restricts greater than 90% of cervical motion
- Indications: Unstable cervical fractures, C1-C2 injuries, post-odontoid fixation
- Complications: Pin site infection (20%), pin loosening, respiratory compromise
Cervical Motion Restriction by Orthosis Type:
| Orthosis | Flex/Ext | Lateral Bend | Rotation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft Collar | 5-10% | 5% | 5% |
| Rigid Collar | 70-80% | 50% | 50% |
| CTO (SOMI) | 80-90% | 60% | 60% |
| Halo Vest | greater than 95% | greater than 95% | greater than 95% |
CHT LSSpinal Orthosis Levels
Memory Hook:CHT LS = Collar, Halo, TLSO, LSO, Scoliosis - know which orthosis for which spinal level!
Condition-Specific Prescriptions
Neurological Conditions
Stroke (Hemiplegia):
- Flaccid phase: Hinged AFO (prevent foot drop, allow DF)
- Spastic phase: Solid AFO if equinus, hinged if mild spasticity
- Consider tone-reducing features (contoured footplate)
- Upper limb: Resting hand splint to prevent contracture
Cerebral Palsy:
- Spastic diplegia: Ground-reaction AFO for crouch gait
- Spastic hemiplegia: Solid or hinged AFO depending on tone
- Equinus: Solid AFO, consider serial casting first
- KAFO rarely tolerated (high energy cost, poor acceptance)
Poliomyelitis/Post-Polio:
- Flaccid weakness pattern
- AFO if ankle dorsiflexors weak
- KAFO if quadriceps weak (locked or stance-control)
- Lightweight materials preferred (carbon fiber, aluminum)
Spinal Cord Injury:
- Complete paraplegia: RGO (Reciprocating Gait Orthosis) for therapeutic standing/walking
- Incomplete injury: AFO or KAFO based on muscle power
- High energy cost limits practical ambulation
Fractures
Tibial Shaft Fracture:
- PTB cast or PTB AFO for protected weight-bearing
- Functional brace (Sarmiento) after initial healing
- Allow knee and ankle motion while protecting tibia
Ankle Fracture (Post-Operative):
- CAM walker (Controlled Ankle Motion) boot
- Allows protected weight-bearing
- Removable for wound care and physiotherapy
Thoracolumbar Fracture:
- TLSO for stable burst or compression fractures
- Duration: 8-12 weeks typically
- Custom-molded for unstable patterns
- Jewett brace for anterior column only
Cervical Fracture:
- Halo vest for unstable C1-C2 injuries
- Rigid collar for stable subaxial injuries
- Duration: 8-12 weeks for halo
Paediatric Conditions
Developmental Dysplasia of Hip:
- Pavlik harness (0-6 months): Hip flexion and abduction
- Abduction orthosis (after Pavlik): Maintain hip position
- Not for exam focus but understand principles
Clubfoot (Post-Correction):
- Denis Browne boots and bar (Ponseti protocol)
- Boots set in external rotation and dorsiflexion
- Maintains correction achieved by casting
- Wear 23 hours/day for 3 months, then night-time
Blount Disease:
- KAFO with valgus force at knee
- Theoretical benefit in infantile Blount (less than 3 years)
- Limited evidence for efficacy
Evidence Base
BrACT Trial - Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- RCT of bracing vs observation for AIS curves 25-40 degrees
- Bracing significantly reduced progression to surgery (28% vs 52%, NNT=4)
- Greater wear time correlated with better outcomes (dose-response)
- Success rate 72% with bracing vs 48% observation
- Terminated early due to clear benefit of bracing
AFO Effectiveness in Stroke - Cochrane Review
- Systematic review of RCTs examining AFO use in stroke patients
- AFOs improve walking speed (mean 0.08 m/s improvement)
- Reduce energy expenditure during walking
- Improve walking independence on functional scales
- Optimal AFO type depends on individual gait pattern
Spinal Orthoses for Thoracolumbar Fractures - Systematic Review
- Review of orthosis use for thoracolumbar burst/compression fractures
- No high-quality RCTs comparing bracing vs no bracing
- TLSO reduces segmental motion by 50-70%
- Jewett brace controls flexion only, not rotation
- Custom TLSO provides better control than prefabricated
Ground-Reaction AFO for Crouch Gait in Cerebral Palsy
- Prospective study of GRAFO in CP patients with crouch gait
- Knee extension in stance improved by mean 12 degrees
- Oxygen cost of walking reduced by 15%
- Improved Gillette Gait Index scores
- Hip extension must be adequate for GRAFO to work
Cervical Orthosis Motion Restriction - Comparative Study
- In vivo radiographic study comparing cervical orthosis effectiveness
- Halo vest restricts 96% of total cervical motion (most effective)
- Rigid collars (Philadelphia, Miami J) restrict 50-70% of motion
- Soft collars provide minimal restriction (less than 15%)
- Upper cervical (C0-C2) poorly controlled by collars - requires halo or CTO
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: AFO Prescription for Stroke Patient
"A 65-year-old man is 3 months post-stroke with left hemiplegia. He has MRC grade 2 ankle dorsiflexors, grade 3 plantarflexors, and mild ankle spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale 1+). He is currently walking with a quad cane and foot drop. What orthosis would you prescribe and why?"
Scenario 2: Spinal Orthosis for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture
"A 55-year-old woman fell from a ladder and sustained an L1 burst fracture. CT shows 40% anterior height loss, 25% canal compromise, intact posterior ligamentous complex (no widening of interspinous distance), and she is neurologically intact. The spine surgeon has decided on conservative management. What orthosis would you prescribe?"
Scenario 3: Paediatric Crouch Gait - Ground-Reaction AFO
"A 10-year-old boy with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (GMFCS Level II) presents with progressive crouch gait over the past year. Examination shows bilateral knee flexion of 25 degrees in stance, ankle dorsiflexion to 15 degrees with knee extended, hip extension to neutral, and hamstring tightness (popliteal angle 45 degrees). He currently wears hinged AFOs. How would you approach his orthotic management?"
Australian Context
NDIS and Orthotic Provision
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is the primary funding source for orthoses in Australia for eligible participants with permanent and significant disability. NDIS covers the full cost of medically necessary orthoses including AFOs, KAFOs, and spinal orthoses when linked to functional goals in the participant's plan.
NDIS Orthotic Funding:
- Participants require NDIS plan with Assistive Technology funding
- Orthotist assessment and prescription included in funding
- Custom devices covered when clinically indicated
- Maintenance and replacement included over device lifespan
- Evidence of functional benefit required for funding approval
For non-NDIS patients (age-related conditions, acquired injuries), orthoses may be accessed through state-based assistive technology programs, private health insurance, or out-of-pocket payment. Many public hospitals provide orthotic services for acute fracture management.
Australian Orthotic Standards
Australian orthotists are certified through the Australian Orthotic Prosthetic Association (AOPA) with minimum Bachelor-level qualification. Custom orthoses are manufactured to ISO 8549 and ISO 22523 standards, ensuring consistent nomenclature and safety requirements. TGA registration is required for medical devices, with most orthoses classified as Class I (low risk).
Clinical Practice Patterns
In Australian orthopaedic practice, orthotic prescription typically follows collaborative multidisciplinary assessment. Major paediatric orthopaedic centres (Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Sydney Children's Hospital, Lady Cilento Brisbane) have integrated orthotic services for cerebral palsy management. Spinal orthotic prescription for trauma is standardized in major trauma centres following TSANZ (Trauma Service Australia and New Zealand) guidelines.
PBS Considerations:
- Orthoses are not PBS-listed (devices, not medications)
- Funding primarily through NDIS, state programs, or private payment
- Contrast with medications where PBS subsidises most costs
ORTHOTIC PRESCRIPTION PRINCIPLES
High-Yield Exam Summary
Nomenclature
- •AFO = Ankle-Foot Orthosis
- •KAFO = Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis
- •TLSO = Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis
- •Named by joints crossed (ISO 8549)
Functions (4 Cs)
- •Control - limit unwanted motion
- •Correct - apply corrective forces
- •Compensate - replace muscle function
- •Protect - allow healing
AFO Selection
- •Solid AFO = spastic equinus
- •Hinged AFO = foot drop, intact PF
- •Ground-reaction = crouch gait
- •FRAFO = floor reaction, extends knee
Spinal Levels
- •TLSO controls T9-L3 effectively
- •Above T9 needs CTLSO (sternal)
- •Below L3 needs thigh extension
- •Halo vest for C0-C7 (best cervical)
Biomechanics
- •Three-point pressure = all correction
- •Longer lever arm = greater control
- •GRAFO moves GRF anterior to knee
- •Force distribution prevents ulcers
Prescription Must Include
- •Diagnosis and functional goal
- •Joints to control
- •Motion to allow/block
- •Material and footwear requirements