Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Osgood-Schlatter Disease

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Osgood-Schlatter Disease

Comprehensive guide to Osgood-Schlatter disease - tibial tubercle apophysitis, diagnosis, treatment, return to sport, and differentiation from other causes of anterior knee pain in adolescents

complete
Updated: 2024-12-19
High Yield Overview

OSGOOD-SCHLATTER DISEASE

Tibial Tubercle Apophysitis | Adolescent Athletes | Activity Modification | Self-Limiting

10-15Peak age (years)
3:1Male to female ratio
25%Bilateral cases
90%Resolve with growth

SEVERITY GRADING

Mild
PatternPain after activity only
TreatmentActivity modification, ice, stretching
Moderate
PatternPain during AND after activity
TreatmentReduce activity, patellar strap, physio
Severe
PatternPain limits daily activities
TreatmentRest from sport, possible immobilization

Critical Must-Knows

  • Traction apophysitis: Repetitive stress on tibial tubercle from patellar tendon during growth spurt
  • Self-limiting condition: Resolves when physis closes (typically 1-2 years), may leave painless bump
  • Clinical diagnosis: Point tenderness over tibial tubercle, worsened by resisted knee extension
  • Treatment is conservative: Activity modification, ice, stretching - rarely any surgery needed
  • X-rays not routine: Reserve for atypical features or to rule out other pathology

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Most common cause of anterior knee pain in athletic adolescents
  • "
    Bilateral in 20-30% but usually asymmetric
  • "
    Persistent bump over tibial tubercle after resolution is normal - not a complication
  • "
    Rarely, a loose ossicle may require excision if symptomatic in adulthood

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Osgood-Schlatter disease. Lateral radiograph of the knee demonstrating fragmentation of the tibial tubercle with overlying soft tissue swelling. (Radiograph courtesy of BC Children's Hospital)
Click to expand
Osgood-Schlatter disease. Lateral radiograph of the knee demonstrating fragmentation of the tibial tubercle with overlying soft tissue swelling. (RadiCredit: Houghton KM et al. via Pediatr Rheumatol Online J via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Osgood-Schlatter Exam Points

Mechanism and Timing

Traction apophysitis during growth spurt. Repetitive contraction of quadriceps pulls on tibial tubercle via patellar tendon. Peak age 10-15 years (earlier in girls due to earlier growth spurt). More common in jumping/running sports (basketball, soccer, gymnastics).

Clinical Features

Point tenderness over tibial tubercle is pathognomonic. Palpable bump (enlarged tubercle). Pain worsened by running, jumping, kneeling, squatting, stairs. Reproduced by resisted knee extension and passive flexion. No effusion, no instability.

Imaging Role

X-rays NOT required for diagnosis - clinical diagnosis. If obtained, may show soft tissue swelling, fragmentation, or irregular ossification of tubercle. Reserve X-rays for: atypical presentation, ruling out tumor/infection, failed treatment, suspected avulsion fracture.

When to Refer

Most cases managed in primary care. Refer if: symptoms persist beyond skeletal maturity, complete avulsion fracture suspected, concern for other diagnoses (tumor, infection), severe symptoms not responding to conservative care after 6 months.

Quick Decision Guide - Anterior Knee Pain in Adolescents

ConditionKey FeaturesTenderness LocationManagement
Osgood-Schlatter10-15y athletes, activity-related pain, bumpTibial tubercle (anterior, distal to patella)Activity modification, stretching, ice
Sinding-Larsen-JohanssonSimilar age/mechanism, pain at inferior poleInterior pole of patellaSame conservative treatment as OSD
Patellofemoral pain syndromeAnterior knee pain, worse sitting/stairsDiffuse peripatellar, retropatellarVMO strengthening, patellar taping
Patellar tendinopathy (jumper's knee)Older athletes (16+), jumping sportsInferior pole patella to tendon insertionEccentric exercises, load management
Tibial tubercle avulsion fractureAcute traumatic event, swelling, unable to extendTibial tubercle with deformityURGENT - surgical fixation usually needed
Mnemonic

OSGOODOSGOOD - Clinical Features

O
Overuse
Repetitive traction injury during growth spurt
S
Sports-related
Running, jumping, kicking sports increase risk
G
Growth plates affected
Tibial tubercle apophysis not yet fused
O
On tibial tubercle
Point tenderness at patellar tendon insertion
O
Obvious bump
Palpable, visible enlargement of tubercle
D
Disappears with maturity
Self-limiting when physis closes

Memory Hook:OSGOOD disease has all the Good features - obvious on exam, self-limiting, no surgery needed.

Mnemonic

TENDERTENDER - Treatment Approach

T
Time off intense activity
Modify not stop all activity
E
Educate patient and parents
Self-limiting, bump may persist
N
NSAIDs for acute flares
Short-term, not long-term
D
Dynamic stretching
Quadriceps and hamstring flexibility
E
Exercise modification
Continue sport at reduced level
R
Return when pain-free
Gradual return to full activity

Memory Hook:Be TENDER with treatment - this is self-limiting, don't over-treat.

Mnemonic

SCHLATTERSCHLATTER - Differential Diagnosis

S
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson
Same mechanism at inferior patella pole
C
Chondromalacia patellae
Articular cartilage softening
H
Hoffa fat pad syndrome
Inflammation of infrapatellar fat pad
L
Lateral patellar compression
Patellofemoral syndrome
A
Avulsion fracture
Acute tibial tubercle avulsion
T
Tumor (rare)
Bone tumors, osteoid osteoma
T
Tendinopathy
Patellar tendinopathy (older patients)
E
Effusion suggests other pathology
OSD rarely causes effusion
R
Referred hip pain
SCFE, Perthes in younger

Memory Hook:Think through SCHLATTER differentials - especially rule out SCFE with hip exam in any pediatric knee pain.

Overview and Epidemiology

Osgood-Schlatter Disease (OSD) is a common traction apophysitis affecting the tibial tubercle in active adolescents. It is characterized by localized pain, swelling, and tenderness at the insertion of the patellar tendon on the tibial tubercle.

Epidemiology:

  • Most common cause of knee pain in athletic adolescents
  • Peak incidence: males 12-15 years, females 10-13 years (earlier due to earlier puberty)
  • Male to female ratio approximately 3:1 (historical), but increasing in females with sports participation
  • 20-30% bilateral (often asymmetric in severity)
  • Most common in running, jumping, kicking sports (soccer, basketball, gymnastics, volleyball)

Why During Growth Spurt?

The tibial tubercle apophysis (secondary ossification center) is biomechanically weaker than mature bone or the patellar tendon. During the adolescent growth spurt, rapid bone growth increases muscle-tendon tension while the apophysis has not yet fused. Repetitive traction from the powerful quadriceps causes microtrauma, inflammation, and sometimes fragmentation of the apophysis.

Etiology and Risk Factors:

Intrinsic Factors

  • Age: Skeletal immaturity with open tibial tubercle physis
  • Sex: Male more common (puberty timing, sports participation)
  • Rapid growth: Growth spurt increases tension
  • Quadriceps tightness: Tight quads increase traction force
  • Hamstring tightness: Adds load to extensor mechanism

Extrinsic Factors

  • High-impact sports: Running, jumping, kicking
  • Training volume: Intense practice schedules during growth
  • Poor conditioning: Sudden increase in activity level
  • Hard playing surfaces: Increase impact loading
  • Inadequate rest periods: No recovery time between training

Natural History:

  • Most cases resolve spontaneously when the tibial tubercle apophysis fuses (typically 1-2 years)
  • Residual bony prominence (bump) persists in most patients - this is NORMAL, not a complication
  • 5-10% have persistent symptoms into adulthood, usually from ossicle within tendon
  • Rare complications: tibial tubercle avulsion fracture, persistent ossicle requiring excision

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Tibial Tubercle Anatomy

The tibial tubercle is the bony prominence on the anterior proximal tibia where the patellar tendon inserts. It originates from a secondary ossification center (apophysis) that appears around age 8-12.

Tibial Tubercle Apophysis Development

StageAge (years)DescriptionClinical Relevance
Cartilaginous0-8Entirely cartilage, no ossificationRarely symptomatic at this age
Apophyseal8-12Secondary ossification center appearsBeginning of vulnerability period
Epiphyseal12-14Ossification extends proximally from apophysisPeak vulnerability - highest OSD incidence
Fusion14-18Apophysis fuses to tibial epiphysisOSD symptoms resolve with fusion

Tibial Tubercle Avulsion

The cartilaginous apophysis is the weak link. During the epiphyseal stage, the apophysis may avulse as a whole with acute trauma (jumping sports, landing). Unlike OSD, avulsion is an ACUTE injury with sudden pain, inability to extend knee, and visible/palpable deformity. Treat as a fracture - usually requires surgical fixation.

Extensor Mechanism Biomechanics

Quadriceps Force Transmission

Quadriceps muscle generates force that is transmitted through:

  • Quadriceps tendon → inserts on patella
  • Patella → acts as sesamoid/pulley
  • Patellar tendon → inserts on tibial tubercle

In growing adolescents, the tibial tubercle apophysis experiences HIGH tensile stress at the tendon-bone junction.

Why Tibial Tubercle?

  • Fulcrum effect: Patella increases quadriceps moment arm 30-50%
  • Peak stress at insertion: Tendon-bone junction concentrates force
  • Weak link: Cartilaginous apophysis weaker than tendon or bone
  • Growth-related tension: Rapid femoral growth increases quad tightness

Quadriceps Angle (Q-Angle)

Increased Q-angle (greater than 15 degrees in males, greater than 18 degrees in females) may increase lateral patellar tracking and contribute to patellofemoral symptoms. However, the relationship between Q-angle and OSD specifically is less clear. Q-angle is more relevant to patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Classification Systems

Clinical Severity Grading

GradeSymptomsImpact on ActivityTreatment Approach
MildPain only after activity, no swelling at restCan complete training sessionsIce after activity, stretching, continue sports
ModeratePain during AND after activity, mild swellingPerformance affected, some activity limitationModify activity level, patellar strap, formal physio
SeverePain at rest, limits daily activities, walking painfulUnable to participate in sportRest from sport, possible short immobilization, physio

Severity Guides Duration

Mild OSD may improve in 6-8 weeks with basic activity modification. Moderate OSD typically requires 3-6 months of modified activity. Severe OSD may need 6-12 months, possibly with periods of complete rest. All grades typically resolve when the physis closes, but symptom duration is proportional to severity.

Ehrenborg Radiographic Classification

Based on lateral knee radiograph appearance (historical, less commonly used clinically):

StageRadiographic AppearanceClinical Significance
1Soft tissue swellingNormal bone, clinical diagnosis
2Irregularity of apophysisFragmentation pattern
3Separate ossicleMay persist into adulthood
4FusionResolution of acute phase

Note: Radiographic changes don't always correlate with symptom severity. Many asymptomatic adolescents have irregular ossification centers. Treat the patient, not the X-ray.

Clinical Assessment

History:

Key Questions

  • Age and sex: Peak 10-15 years, more common in males
  • Sports participation: Type, frequency, intensity
  • Training changes: Recent increase in volume or intensity?
  • Pain characteristics: Location, timing, aggravating factors
  • Bilateral symptoms: 20-30% bilateral
  • Previous injury: Rule out acute trauma

Red Flags

  • Night pain or rest pain: Consider tumor, infection
  • Acute traumatic onset: Avulsion fracture
  • Knee effusion: Unusual for OSD - suggests other pathology
  • Systemic symptoms: Fever, weight loss - infection, malignancy
  • Very young child: Under age 8 - OSD rare, investigate
  • Hip symptoms: SCFE, Perthes - examine hip in all knee pain

Physical Examination:

Systematic Examination

Step 1Inspection
  • Visible bump over tibial tubercle (enlarged, prominent)
  • Compare bilateral - may be asymmetric if bilateral OSD
  • Look for effusion (unusual for OSD - suggests other diagnosis)
  • Assess overall limb alignment, muscle bulk
Step 2Palpation
  • Point tenderness over tibial tubercle - pathognomonic
  • Palpate entire patellar tendon (rule out tendinopathy)
  • Palpate inferior pole of patella (Sinding-Larsen-Johansson)
  • Palpate medial and lateral joint lines (meniscal pathology)
  • Palpate patella and peripatellar tissues
Step 3Range of Motion
  • Knee ROM: Usually full, may have slight flexion discomfort
  • Passive flexion: May be painful at end range (compresses tubercle)
  • Quadriceps and hamstring flexibility: Often reduced
  • Hip ROM: Must examine hip to rule out referred pain (SCFE)
Step 4Special Tests
  • Resisted knee extension: Reproduces pain over tibial tubercle
  • Active knee extension: May be painful against resistance
  • Patellar mobility: Normal in OSD (unlike patellofemoral syndrome)
  • Ligament stability: Should be normal
  • Meniscal tests: Should be negative

Always Examine the Hip

SCFE and Perthes disease commonly present as knee pain in children due to referred pain along the obturator nerve. In ANY child presenting with knee pain, especially if obesity or limited hip ROM is present, you MUST examine the hip. Missing SCFE can lead to avascular necrosis and hip destruction.

Investigations

Clinical Diagnosis

Osgood-Schlatter is a CLINICAL diagnosis. Imaging is NOT required in typical cases. Key clinical features (point tenderness over tibial tubercle in athletic adolescent during growth spurt) are sufficient for diagnosis. Reserve imaging for atypical presentations or to exclude other pathology.

When to Order Imaging:

Indications for X-ray

  • Acute traumatic event (rule out avulsion fracture)
  • Atypical age (too young or too old for OSD)
  • Night pain or rest pain (rule out tumor)
  • Effusion (unusual for OSD)
  • Failure to improve with 3-6 months conservative treatment
  • Suspected loose ossicle in symptomatic adult

What X-rays Show

  • Soft tissue swelling anterior to tibial tubercle
  • Fragmentation of tubercle ossification center
  • Irregular ossification of apophysis
  • Separate ossicle in patellar tendon (may persist)
  • Prominent tibial tubercle post-fusion

Other Imaging:

ModalityIndicationFindingsClinical Use
Lateral X-rayFirst-line if imaging neededSoft tissue swelling, fragmentation, ossicleConfirm diagnosis, rule out fracture
UltrasoundAssess patellar tendon, soft tissuesTendon thickening, fragmentation, bursaUseful if tendinopathy suspected
MRIRule out tumor, stress fracture, infectionEdema at tubercle, soft tissue changesRarely needed - reserve for red flags

Management Algorithm

Non-Operative Management (First-Line for ALL Cases)

95%+ of OSD resolves with conservative treatment alone.

Conservative Treatment Protocol

ImmediateActivity Modification
  • Do NOT stop all activity - reduce intensity and volume
  • Avoid painful activities (deep squats, jumping, kneeling)
  • Continue sport at reduced level if tolerable
  • Cross-train with low-impact activities (swimming, cycling)
  • Ice after activity (15-20 minutes) for symptom relief
OngoingFlexibility Program
  • Quadriceps stretching: Reduces traction force on tubercle
  • Hamstring stretching: Decreases quadriceps demand
  • Hip flexor stretching: Improves mechanics
  • Hold stretches 30 seconds, 3-4 times daily
  • Dynamic warm-up before activity
GradualStrengthening
  • Eccentric quadriceps: Once acute pain settles
  • Core stability: Reduce load on knee during activity
  • Hip strengthening: Improve biomechanics
  • Progress gradually as symptoms allow
As NeededAdjuncts
  • Patellar strap/brace: Reduces traction on tubercle
  • Knee pad: Protects tubercle when kneeling
  • NSAIDs: Short-term for acute flares (not long-term)
  • Ice/heat: Symptom relief

Avoid Complete Rest

Prolonged complete rest is NOT recommended. It weakens muscles, detrains the athlete, and delays return to sport. Modify activity to a tolerable level rather than stopping entirely. The exception is severe cases with rest pain, which may need a short period of immobilization.

Return to Sport Protocol

PhaseCriteria to ProgressActivities AllowedDuration
1. Pain ControlPain-free daily activitiesStretching, non-impact exerciseUntil pain-free walking
2. StrengtheningPain-free exercises, full ROMEccentric exercises, light jogging2-4 weeks
3. Sport-SpecificPain-free jogging, 75% strengthDrills, non-contact practice2-4 weeks
4. Full ReturnFull training without symptomsFull competitionGradual return

Key Points for Return:

  • Return when pain-free during sport-specific activities
  • Gradual progression - increase volume before intensity
  • Expect ongoing mild symptoms during growth spurt
  • Patellar strap may be used during sport for protection
  • Condition fully resolves when tubercle physis closes

Follow these principles for a safe and successful return to full activity.

Management of Severe or Refractory OSD

For cases that don't respond to 3-6 months of conservative treatment:

Extended Conservative

  • Period of complete rest (2-4 weeks immobilization if needed)
  • Formal physiotherapy program
  • Address biomechanical contributing factors
  • Continued stretching and strengthening
  • May need to reduce sport intensity for entire season

Referral Indications

  • Symptoms persist beyond skeletal maturity
  • Failure of 6+ months conservative treatment
  • Suspected avulsion fracture
  • Concern for other pathology (tumor, infection)
  • Symptomatic ossicle in tendon (adults)

Surgical Excision - Rare

Surgery is almost never needed for OSD in adolescents. In rare adults with persistent symptoms from a loose ossicle within the patellar tendon, excision of the ossicle may be performed. This is typically arthroscopic or open with excellent outcomes. Surgery for acute symptoms in adolescents is NOT recommended.

Surgical Technique

Ossicle Excision (Adults Only)

Surgery Rarely Needed

Surgery for Osgood-Schlatter disease is extremely rare and reserved for symptomatic ossicle in adults (post-skeletal maturity) or cosmetic removal of prominent tibial tubercle. Surgery is NOT indicated for active OSD in adolescents.

Indications:

  • Skeletal maturity (closed tibial tubercle physis)
  • Persistent focal pain over ossicle
  • Failed conservative management (6+ months)
  • Imaging confirms symptomatic ossicle within tendon

Technique:

  • Longitudinal or transverse incision over tibial tubercle
  • Identify ossicle within patellar tendon substance
  • Excise ossicle, debride tendon edges
  • Repair tendon if needed
  • Some surgeons also smooth prominent tibial tubercle

This is a straightforward procedure with excellent outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Surgical Outcomes

Results of Ossicle Excision:

  • 90%+ good/excellent results with pain relief
  • Return to sport typically 3-4 months postoperatively
  • Main complication: recurrent pain, rare extensor weakness

Patient Selection is Key:

  • Must be skeletally mature
  • Must have failed prolonged conservative management
  • Must have imaging-confirmed symptomatic ossicle

Most adolescents with OSD do NOT require surgery and will resolve with conservative management alone.

Complications

Complications and Long-Term Sequelae of OSD

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Persistent bony prominenceVery common (50%+)Part of natural historyReassurance - cosmetic only, does not affect function
Tibial tubercle avulsion fractureRare (less than 1%)Acute trauma in severe OSDSurgical ORIF if displaced, cast if non-displaced
Symptomatic ossicle in adult5-10%Large initial ossicle, non-complianceOssicle excision if failed conservative treatment
Patellar tendinopathyUncommonReturn to sport too early, ongoing overuseEccentric loading program, activity modification
Pain with kneeling10-20%Prominent tubercle persistsKnee pads, reassurance, rarely surgical reduction

Avulsion Fracture Not Same as OSD

Tibial tubercle avulsion fracture is DIFFERENT from OSD. Avulsion is acute, traumatic, with sudden pain and inability to extend knee. It requires urgent orthopaedic referral. OSD is chronic, overuse, with gradual onset and preserved extension. Do not confuse these conditions.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation for Ossicle Excision (Adults)

Post-Ossicle Excision Protocol

Protection PhaseWeek 0-2
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated
  • ROM exercises as comfort allows
  • Ice, elevation for swelling
  • Gentle quadriceps sets
Early RehabWeek 2-6
  • Full ROM expected by 6 weeks
  • Progressive strengthening
  • Bike, swimming for cardio
  • Avoid deep squats, jumping
Advanced RehabWeek 6-12
  • Sport-specific training
  • Plyometrics progression
  • Jogging, running progression
Return to SportWeek 12+
  • Full return based on strength testing
  • Typically 3-4 months for full competition
  • Ongoing maintenance stretching

Rehabilitation for Conservative OSD (Adolescents)

This is the main patient population - structured rehab program while continuing modified activity:

  • Daily stretching: Quadriceps, hamstrings, hip flexors (30 sec × 3)
  • Eccentric strengthening: When acute pain settles
  • Core stability exercises
  • Sport modification: Continue at reduced level
  • Ice after activity
  • Gradual progression as symptoms allow

Outcomes

Long-Term Outcomes:

  • Excellent prognosis - most cases resolve completely with skeletal maturity
  • Symptoms typically improve within 1-2 years (when tubercle physis fuses)
  • Persistent tibial tubercle prominence is common but NOT a functional problem
  • Most athletes return to full sport without long-term issues
  • 5-10% have some adult symptoms, usually mild or related to ossicle

Predictors of Prolonged Course:

  • Severe initial presentation
  • Delay in activity modification
  • Ongoing intense sports participation without modification
  • Bilateral involvement

The Bump is Normal

Parents often worry about the residual bump over the tibial tubercle. Reassure them this is part of the normal healing process - the prominence represents bone that formed during the inflammatory phase and is now incorporated into the mature tubercle. It is cosmetic only and does not affect function or sports performance.

Evidence Base

Natural History of Osgood-Schlatter Disease

4
Krause BL et al • J Pediatr Orthop (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term follow-up study of 69 patients with OSD
  • 95% had good outcomes at skeletal maturity
  • 76% had residual tibial tubercle prominence
  • 10% had difficulty kneeling in adulthood - mainly cosmetic concern
Clinical Implication: OSD is a self-limiting condition with excellent long-term outcomes. Residual prominence is common but not functionally limiting.
Limitation: Retrospective case series without control group.

Conservative Management Outcomes

5
Gholve PA et al • Curr Opin Pediatr (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of OSD management
  • Activity modification and stretching are mainstays of treatment
  • Complete rest not recommended - modify activity level
  • Surgery rarely indicated in adolescents
Clinical Implication: Conservative management with activity modification is effective. Avoid over-treatment - this is a self-limiting condition.
Limitation: Narrative review, not systematic review.

Patellar Strap Effectiveness

2
Çelik A et al • J Pediatr Orthop B (2019)
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing patellar strap vs no strap in OSD
  • Patellar strap group had faster symptom resolution
  • Significant improvement in pain scores with strap use
  • Strap may reduce traction force on tibial tubercle
Clinical Implication: Patellar straps are a reasonable adjunct to activity modification. May accelerate symptom resolution.
Limitation: Single-center RCT with relatively short follow-up.

Ossicle Excision in Adults

4
Pihlajamaki HK et al • Am J Sports Med (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective study of ossicle excision in military personnel
  • 89% good/excellent results at mean 10-year follow-up
  • Mean return to duty 3.4 months postoperatively
  • Low complication rate
Clinical Implication: Ossicle excision is effective for symptomatic adults who have failed conservative management.
Limitation: Military population may not generalize to all patients.

Risk Factors for Osgood-Schlatter Disease

3
Rathleff MS et al • Br J Sports Med (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort study of 1854 adolescents
  • High sports participation volume associated with OSD
  • Quadriceps tightness was a significant risk factor
  • Rapid growth was associated with increased incidence
Clinical Implication: Prevention strategies should target flexibility and training load management during growth spurts.
Limitation: Association does not prove causation.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 13-year-old boy who plays soccer presents with 3 months of anterior knee pain. The pain is worse after training and he has noticed a bump at the front of his knee."

VIVA Q&A
Q1:What is the most likely diagnosis and how would you confirm it?
The most likely diagnosis is Osgood-Schlatter disease, a traction apophysitis of the tibial tubercle. This is a clinical diagnosis based on: age (peak 10-15 years), sport participation (soccer involves running and kicking), activity-related pain, and visible/palpable bump. I would confirm by examining for point tenderness directly over the tibial tubercle, which is pathognomonic. Pain should be reproduced by resisted knee extension. X-rays are not required for typical presentations but can show soft tissue swelling or tubercle fragmentation if obtained.
Q2:How would you manage this patient?
Management is conservative for all cases of OSD. I would: (1) Educate the patient and parents that this is self-limiting and will resolve when he stops growing, but the bump may persist as a cosmetic issue only. (2) Recommend activity modification - not complete rest, but reduce training intensity to a tolerable level. (3) Prescribe a stretching program targeting the quadriceps and hamstrings - 30 second holds, 3-4 times daily. (4) Apply ice after activity for 15-20 minutes. (5) Consider a patellar strap during sport to reduce tubercle loading. (6) NSAIDs short-term for acute flares if needed.
Q3:His parents ask if he needs to stop playing soccer. What is your advice?
I would advise against stopping soccer entirely. Complete rest is actually not recommended - it weakens muscles and delays return to sport. Instead, I recommend modifying his participation: reduce training frequency or duration to a level where pain is tolerable, avoid painful activities like deep squats or kneeling, and use ice after training. He can continue to play matches at reduced intensity if symptoms allow. Cross-training with low-impact activities like swimming or cycling maintains fitness. The goal is to stay active while managing symptoms until the condition resolves with skeletal maturity over the next 1-2 years.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
OSD is a clinical diagnosis - point tenderness over tibial tubercle
Self-limiting condition, resolves with skeletal maturity
Activity modification, NOT complete rest
Stretching and ice are mainstays of treatment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ordering unnecessary imaging for typical presentation
✗Recommending complete rest from sport
✗Missing hip pathology - always examine hip in pediatric knee pain
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if he had acute traumatic onset?"
"When would you order X-rays?"
"What is the long-term prognosis?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"An 11-year-old female gymnast presents with bilateral anterior knee pain. She trains 20 hours per week and has competition in 6 weeks. Parents want a solution so she can compete."

VIVA Q&A
Q1:What are your concerns with this presentation?
I have several concerns: (1) Bilateral symptoms in a young female athlete during growth spurt is consistent with OSD but represents significant load on both extensor mechanisms. (2) High training volume (20 hours/week) is a major risk factor and likely contributing to symptoms. (3) Gymnastics involves repetitive jumping, landing, and squatting - high-load activities for the tibial tubercle. (4) Pressure to compete in 6 weeks may lead to insufficient recovery time. I would also need to examine her hips to rule out referred pain from SCFE or Perthes, and consider other causes of bilateral knee pain like patellofemoral syndrome.
Q2:How would you approach the discussion about training and competition?
I would have an honest conversation with the family about balancing short-term goals against long-term health. First, I would explain that OSD is self-limiting and not damaging the joint, but competing through significant pain can prolong symptoms. I would recommend: (1) Immediate reduction in training volume and intensity - focus only on essential competition skills. (2) Eliminate or reduce repetitive jumping and landing activities. (3) Aggressive stretching program and ice after training. (4) Patellar straps during Training. (5) Whether to compete depends on symptom severity - if moderate/severe pain, I would recommend against competition or significant training reduction. Pushing through severe OSD symptoms can prolong recovery by months.
Q3:She competes despite your advice and now presents 3 months later with worsening symptoms. What now?
The worsening symptoms likely reflect ongoing overuse without adequate recovery. My approach now would include: (1) More structured rest - mandatory reduction in training volume, possibly complete break from gymnastics for 2-4 weeks. (2) Formal physiotherapy program for flexibility and eccentric strengthening once acute pain settles. (3) Consider short-term immobilization if symptoms are very severe. (4) Address the training environment - she may need to communicate with coaches about a modified practice program. (5) If symptoms truly not improving after 6 months of appropriate conservative management, I would arrange imaging to confirm diagnosis and rule out other pathology like stress fracture.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
High training volume is a modifiable risk factor
Discussing short-term vs long-term goals with families
Cannot always meet parental/athlete expectations
Formal physio for refractory cases
COMMON TRAPS
✗Caving to pressure for quick fixes
✗Not addressing the underlying cause (training load)
✗Missing other causes of bilateral knee pain
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if she had night pain?"
"When would you refer to a specialist?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

EXAMINER

"A 14-year-old basketball player jumps for a rebound and lands with sudden severe knee pain. He cannot extend his knee and you notice a visible deformity over the tibial tubercle."

VIVA Q&A
Q1:What is your main concern and how is this different from Osgood-Schlatter disease?
My main concern is a tibial tubercle AVULSION FRACTURE, which is a surgical emergency. This is DIFFERENT from OSD in several key ways: (1) Mechanism is ACUTE traumatic (jumping/landing) vs insidious overuse in OSD. (2) Sudden severe pain vs gradual activity-related pain. (3) Inability to extend the knee suggests disruption of the extensor mechanism - this does NOT occur in OSD. (4) Visible deformity suggests displaced bone fragment. While OSD can weaken the tibial tubercle apophysis and predispose to avulsion, the avulsion itself is a distinct injury requiring urgent management.
Q2:How would you manage this acutely?
This is an acute orthopaedic emergency. Immediate management includes: (1) Immobilize the leg in extension with a splint - do not attempt to flex. (2) Ice and elevation for pain and swelling. (3) Urgent X-rays - lateral view will show a displaced tibial tubercle fragment. (4) Urgent orthopaedic referral - this patient needs operative fixation. I would call the on-call orthopaedic registrar immediately. Do not allow weight-bearing. Assess neurovascular status of the leg and document. Provide analgesia while awaiting transfer or orthopaedic review.
Q3:What is the typical surgical management and what complications should you warn about?
Surgical management is typically open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The tibial tubercle fragment is reduced and fixed with screws or tension band wiring to restore the extensor mechanism. Complications to warn about include: (1) Growth disturbance - the physis may be injured, risking leg length discrepancy or angular deformity particularly genu recurvatum. (2) Hardware prominence - may need removal after healing. (3) Stiffness and loss of knee flexion. (4) Re-fracture. (5) Extensor weakness if repair fails or is inadequate. (6) Compartment syndrome is rare but possible especially if associated vascular injury. Long-term outcome is generally good with appropriate fixation, but growth monitoring is important in skeletally immature patients.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Avulsion fracture is ACUTE traumatic, different from chronic OSD
Inability to extend knee suggests extensor mechanism disruption
Urgent orthopaedic referral for surgical fixation
Warn about growth disturbance in skeletally immature patients
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing acute avulsion with chronic OSD
✗Delaying orthopaedic referral
✗Missing neurovascular injury
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you classify tibial tubercle avulsion fractures?"
"What is genu recurvatum and why does it occur?"

MCQ Practice Points

Distinguishing OSD from Avulsion

Q: An adolescent presents with knee pain after jumping. How do you distinguish OSD from avulsion fracture? A: OSD has GRADUAL onset, pain during/after activity, ability to extend knee, and no visible deformity. Avulsion has ACUTE onset after trauma, inability to extend knee, visible/palpable deformity, and severe pain. X-ray shows displaced fragment in avulsion vs fragmentation in OSD.

When to Image

Q: Which of the following is an indication for X-ray in suspected OSD? A: Night pain (rule out tumor), acute traumatic onset (rule out avulsion), failure to improve after 6 months conservative treatment, atypical age (less than 8 or after skeletal maturity). Routine OSD does NOT require imaging.

Treatment Approach

Q: What is the recommended activity level for adolescent with OSD? A: Activity MODIFICATION, not complete rest. Continue sport at reduced level if tolerable. Avoid painful activities (deep squats, kneeling, jumping). Cross-train with low-impact activities. Complete rest weakens muscles and delays return.

Natural History

Q: What happens to the bump after OSD resolves? A: The tibial tubercle prominence typically persists as a painless, cosmetic bump in 50-75% of patients. This represents ossification that occurred during the healing process and is now incorporated into the mature tubercle. It is NOT a complication and does not affect function.

Differential Diagnosis

Q: A 12-year-old with knee pain has point tenderness at the INFERIOR POLE of patella. What is the diagnosis? A: Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome - traction apophysitis at the inferior pole of patella (where central patellar tendon originates). Same mechanism as OSD but at the proximal end of the patellar tendon. Treatment is identical - activity modification, stretching, ice.

Medicolegal Considerations

Key Documentation Points:

  • Clear history of gradual onset and activity-related symptoms
  • Documentation of point tenderness specifically over tibial tubercle
  • Hip examination performed (to exclude SCFE/Perthes)
  • Discussion of self-limiting nature and expected timeline
  • Activity modification advice given (not complete rest)

Consent Considerations (if rare surgery needed):

  • Risk of persistent symptoms
  • Hardware removal may be needed
  • Scar
  • Stiffness

Don't Miss SCFE

SCFE commonly presents as knee pain in obese adolescent males. Missing SCFE diagnosis causes significant morbidity from AVN. Document hip examination in ALL adolescents presenting with knee pain. This is a frequent source of litigation in pediatric orthopaedics.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Common in Australian adolescents, particularly in popular sports (AFL, soccer, basketball, netball)
  • Equal or increasing incidence in females with increased sports participation
  • Managed primarily in general practice and sports medicine clinics

Access to Care:

  • Most cases managed in primary care without specialist referral
  • Physiotherapy widely available through Medicare (5 sessions under Chronic Disease Management plan) or private
  • Sports medicine physicians manage more complex cases
  • Orthopaedic referral rare - mainly for suspected avulsion or refractory adult symptoms

Prevention Strategies:

  • Sports Medicine Australia guidelines emphasize load management
  • School and club sports programs increasingly aware of growth spurt risks
  • Pre-season screening programs may identify at-risk athletes

High-Yield Exam Summary

Diagnosis

  • •Clinical diagnosis - imaging not required
  • •Point tenderness over tibial tubercle
  • •Pain with resisted knee extension
  • •10-15 years, athletic, growth spurt

Treatment

  • •Activity MODIFICATION not complete rest
  • •Stretching: quads, hamstrings, hip flexors
  • •Ice after activity (15-20 min)
  • •Patellar strap during sport
  • •NSAIDs short-term for flares only

Imaging Indications

  • •Acute traumatic onset (avulsion)
  • •Night pain (tumor)
  • •Failure after 6 months conservative
  • •Atypical age or presentation

Red Flags

  • •Acute trauma with inability to extend = AVULSION
  • •Night/rest pain = tumor, infection
  • •Knee effusion = not typical for OSD
  • •Hip symptoms = SCFE, Perthes

Prognosis

  • •90%+ resolve with skeletal maturity
  • •Duration 1-2 years (until physis closes)
  • •Bump persists but is painless
  • •5-10% adult symptoms (usually ossicle)
Quick Stats
Reading Time99 min
Related Topics

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Atlantoaxial Instability

Blount Disease (Tibia Vara)

Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy