Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome

Comprehensive guide to Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome - inferior pole patellar apophysitis, diagnosis, treatment, return to sport, and differentiation from other causes of anterior knee pain in adolescents

complete
Updated: 2025-01-19
High Yield Overview

SINDING-LARSEN-JOHANSSON SYNDROME

Inferior Pole Patellar Apophysitis | Adolescent Athletes | Activity Modification | Self-Limiting

10-14Peak age (years)
2:1Male to female ratio
20-30%Bilateral cases
90%+Resolve with growth

SEVERITY GRADING

Mild
PatternPain after activity only
TreatmentActivity modification, ice, stretching
Moderate
PatternPain during AND after activity
TreatmentReduce activity, patellar strap, physio
Severe
PatternPain limits daily activities
TreatmentRest from sport, possible immobilization

Critical Must-Knows

  • Traction apophysitis: Repetitive stress on inferior pole of patella from patellar tendon during growth spurt
  • Self-limiting condition: Resolves when apophysis closes (typically 1-2 years), may leave painless calcification
  • Clinical diagnosis: Point tenderness over inferior pole of patella, worsened by resisted knee extension
  • Treatment is conservative: Activity modification, ice, stretching - rarely any surgery needed
  • Less common than OSD: Similar mechanism but affects proximal end of patellar tendon

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Less common than Osgood-Schlatter but same mechanism and treatment
  • "
    Bilateral in 20-30% but usually asymmetric
  • "
    Often coexists with Osgood-Schlatter disease
  • "
    Persistent calcification at inferior pole after resolution is normal

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Twelve-year-old soccer, basketball, and lacrosse player with anterior knee pain. (A) Sagittal inversion recovery and (B) proton density images demonstrate bone marrow edema about the tibial tubercle a
Click to expand
Twelve-year-old soccer, basketball, and lacrosse player with anterior knee pain. (A) Sagittal inversion recovery and (B) proton density images demonstCredit: Jawetz ST et al. via Sports Health via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Osgood-Schlatter disease. Lateral radiograph of the knee demonstrating fragmentation of the tibial tubercle with overlying soft tissue swelling. (Radiograph courtesy of BC Children's Hospital)
Click to expand
Osgood-Schlatter disease. Lateral radiograph of the knee demonstrating fragmentation of the tibial tubercle with overlying soft tissue swelling. (RadiCredit: Houghton KM et al. via Pediatr Rheumatol Online J via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Exam Points

Mechanism and Timing

Traction apophysitis at inferior pole of patella. Repetitive contraction of quadriceps pulls on inferior pole via patellar tendon origin. Peak age 10-14 years (slightly younger than OSD). More common in jumping/running sports (basketball, soccer, gymnastics, volleyball).

Clinical Features

Point tenderness over inferior pole of patella is pathognomonic. Pain worsened by running, jumping, kneeling, squatting, stairs. Reproduced by resisted knee extension and passive flexion. May have palpable calcification. No effusion, no instability.

Imaging Role

X-rays NOT required for diagnosis - clinical diagnosis. If obtained, may show soft tissue swelling, fragmentation, or irregular ossification at inferior pole. Reserve X-rays for: atypical presentation, ruling out tumor/infection, failed treatment, suspected avulsion fracture.

When to Refer

Most cases managed in primary care. Refer if: symptoms persist beyond skeletal maturity, complete avulsion fracture suspected, concern for other diagnoses (tumor, infection), severe symptoms not responding to conservative care after 6 months.

Quick Decision Guide - Anterior Knee Pain in Adolescents

ConditionKey FeaturesTenderness LocationManagement
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson10-14y athletes, activity-related painInferior pole of patellaActivity modification, stretching, ice
Osgood-Schlatter10-15y athletes, activity-related pain, bumpTibial tubercle (anterior, distal to patella)Same conservative treatment as SLJ
Patellofemoral pain syndromeAnterior knee pain, worse sitting/stairsDiffuse peripatellar, retropatellarVMO strengthening, patellar taping
Patellar tendinopathy (jumper's knee)Older athletes (16+), jumping sportsInferior pole patella to tendon insertionEccentric exercises, load management
Inferior pole avulsion fractureAcute traumatic event, swelling, unable to extendInferior pole with deformityURGENT - surgical fixation usually needed
Mnemonic

SLJSLJ - Clinical Features

S
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson
Inferior pole patellar apophysitis
L
Less common than OSD
Similar mechanism but at patella, not tibia
J
Jumping sports
Basketball, volleyball, gymnastics increase risk

Memory Hook:SLJ affects the Superior-Lower Junction of the patellar tendon - where it originates from the inferior pole of the patella.

Mnemonic

INFERIORINFERIOR - Location and Features

I
Inferior pole
Patellar tendon origin at patella
N
Not tibial tubercle
Different from Osgood-Schlatter location
F
Flexion pain
Passive flexion compresses inferior pole
E
Extension resisted
Reproduces pain at inferior pole
R
Running/jumping
Aggravating activities
I
Irregular ossification
X-ray may show fragmentation
O
Overuse during growth
Growth spurt increases risk
R
Resolves with maturity
Self-limiting when physis closes

Memory Hook:INFERIOR pole is where the patellar tendon originates - this is the proximal end of the extensor mechanism, opposite to OSD at the distal end.

Mnemonic

TREATTREAT - Treatment Approach

T
Time off intense activity
Modify not stop all activity
R
Rest from painful activities
Avoid jumping, deep squats, kneeling
E
Educate patient and parents
Self-limiting, calcification may persist
A
Activity modification
Continue sport at reduced level
T
Treat with stretching and ice
Quadriceps flexibility, ice after activity

Memory Hook:TREAT SLJ with Tender care - this is self-limiting, don't over-treat.

Overview and Epidemiology

Sinding-Larsen-Johansson (SLJ) Syndrome is a traction apophysitis affecting the inferior pole of the patella in active adolescents. It is characterized by localized pain, swelling, and tenderness at the origin of the patellar tendon on the inferior pole of the patella.

Epidemiology:

  • Less common than Osgood-Schlatter disease but same mechanism
  • Peak incidence: males 11-14 years, females 10-13 years
  • Male to female ratio approximately 2:1
  • 20-30% bilateral (often asymmetric in severity)
  • Most common in running, jumping, kicking sports (soccer, basketball, gymnastics, volleyball)
  • Often coexists with Osgood-Schlatter disease (both ends of patellar tendon affected)

Why During Growth Spurt?

The inferior pole of the patella has a secondary ossification center (apophysis) that is biomechanically weaker than mature bone or the patellar tendon. During the adolescent growth spurt, rapid bone growth increases muscle-tendon tension while the apophysis has not yet fused. Repetitive traction from the powerful quadriceps causes microtrauma, inflammation, and sometimes fragmentation of the apophysis at the patellar tendon origin.

Etiology and Risk Factors:

Intrinsic Factors

  • Age: Skeletal immaturity with open patellar apophysis
  • Sex: Male more common (puberty timing, sports participation)
  • Rapid growth: Growth spurt increases tension
  • Quadriceps tightness: Tight quads increase traction force
  • Hamstring tightness: Adds load to extensor mechanism

Extrinsic Factors

  • High-impact sports: Running, jumping, kicking
  • Training volume: Intense practice schedules during growth
  • Poor conditioning: Sudden increase in activity level
  • Hard playing surfaces: Increase impact loading
  • Inadequate rest periods: No recovery time between training

Natural History:

  • Most cases resolve spontaneously when the patellar apophysis fuses (typically 1-2 years)
  • Residual calcification at inferior pole may persist - this is NORMAL, not a complication
  • 5-10% have persistent symptoms into adulthood
  • Rare complications: inferior pole avulsion fracture, persistent symptomatic calcification

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Inferior Pole Patella Anatomy

The inferior pole of the patella is where the patellar tendon originates. The patella has a secondary ossification center at its inferior pole that appears during childhood and fuses during adolescence.

Patellar Apophysis Development

StageAge (years)DescriptionClinical Relevance
Cartilaginous0-8Entirely cartilage, no ossificationRarely symptomatic at this age
Apophyseal8-12Secondary ossification center appears at inferior poleBeginning of vulnerability period
Epiphyseal10-14Ossification extends, peak vulnerabilityPeak SLJ incidence
Fusion14-18Apophysis fuses to patellaSLJ symptoms resolve with fusion

Inferior Pole Avulsion

The cartilaginous apophysis is the weak link. During the epiphyseal stage, the inferior pole may avulse with acute trauma (jumping sports, landing). Unlike SLJ, avulsion is an ACUTE injury with sudden pain, inability to extend knee, and visible/palpable deformity. Treat as a fracture - usually requires surgical fixation.

Extensor Mechanism Biomechanics

Quadriceps Force Transmission

Quadriceps muscle generates force that is transmitted through:

  • Quadriceps tendon → inserts on superior pole of patella
  • Patella → acts as sesamoid/pulley
  • Patellar tendon → originates from inferior pole, inserts on tibial tubercle

In growing adolescents, the inferior pole apophysis experiences HIGH tensile stress at the tendon-bone junction.

Why Inferior Pole?

  • Tendon origin: Patellar tendon originates from inferior pole
  • Peak stress at origin: Tendon-bone junction concentrates force
  • Weak link: Cartilaginous apophysis weaker than tendon or bone
  • Growth-related tension: Rapid femoral growth increases quad tightness

Relationship to Osgood-Schlatter

SLJ and OSD affect opposite ends of the patellar tendon. SLJ affects the origin (inferior pole of patella) while OSD affects the insertion (tibial tubercle). Both are traction apophysitides with the same mechanism, age group, and treatment. Patients may have both conditions simultaneously, representing stress at both ends of the extensor mechanism.

Classification Systems

Clinical Severity Grading

GradeSymptomsImpact on ActivityTreatment Approach
MildPain only after activity, no swelling at restCan complete training sessionsIce after activity, stretching, continue sports
ModeratePain during AND after activity, mild swellingPerformance affected, some activity limitationModify activity level, patellar strap, formal physio
SeverePain at rest, limits daily activities, walking painfulUnable to participate in sportRest from sport, possible short immobilization, physio

Severity Guides Duration

Mild SLJ may improve in 6-8 weeks with basic activity modification. Moderate SLJ typically requires 3-6 months of modified activity. Severe SLJ may need 6-12 months, possibly with periods of complete rest. All grades typically resolve when the physis closes, but symptom duration is proportional to severity.

Radiographic Appearance

Based on lateral knee radiograph appearance (less commonly used clinically):

StageRadiographic AppearanceClinical Significance
1Soft tissue swelling anterior to inferior poleNormal bone, clinical diagnosis
2Irregularity of inferior pole ossificationFragmentation pattern
3Separate ossicle at inferior poleMay persist into adulthood
4FusionResolution of acute phase

Note: Radiographic changes don't always correlate with symptom severity. Many asymptomatic adolescents have irregular ossification. Treat the patient, not the X-ray.

Clinical Assessment

History:

Key Questions

  • Age and sex: Peak 10-14 years, more common in males
  • Sports participation: Type, frequency, intensity
  • Training changes: Recent increase in volume or intensity?
  • Pain characteristics: Location, timing, aggravating factors
  • Bilateral symptoms: 20-30% bilateral
  • Previous injury: Rule out acute trauma
  • Coexisting OSD: Check for tibial tubercle symptoms

Red Flags

  • Night pain or rest pain: Consider tumor, infection
  • Acute traumatic onset: Avulsion fracture
  • Knee effusion: Unusual for SLJ - suggests other pathology
  • Systemic symptoms: Fever, weight loss - infection, malignancy
  • Very young child: Under age 8 - SLJ rare, investigate
  • Hip symptoms: SCFE, Perthes - examine hip in all knee pain

Physical Examination:

Systematic Examination

Step 1Inspection
  • Visible swelling over inferior pole of patella (less common than OSD bump)
  • Compare bilateral - may be asymmetric if bilateral SLJ
  • Look for effusion (unusual for SLJ - suggests other diagnosis)
  • Assess overall limb alignment, muscle bulk
Step 2Palpation
  • Point tenderness over inferior pole of patella - pathognomonic
  • Palpate entire patellar tendon (rule out tendinopathy)
  • Palpate tibial tubercle (check for coexisting OSD)
  • Palpate medial and lateral joint lines (meniscal pathology)
  • Palpate patella and peripatellar tissues
Step 3Range of Motion
  • Knee ROM: Usually full, may have slight flexion discomfort
  • Passive flexion: May be painful at end range (compresses inferior pole)
  • Quadriceps and hamstring flexibility: Often reduced
  • Hip ROM: Must examine hip to rule out referred pain (SCFE)
Step 4Special Tests
  • Resisted knee extension: Reproduces pain over inferior pole
  • Active knee extension: May be painful against resistance
  • Patellar mobility: Normal in SLJ (unlike patellofemoral syndrome)
  • Ligament stability: Should be normal
  • Meniscal tests: Should be negative

Always Examine the Hip

SCFE and Perthes disease commonly present as knee pain in children due to referred pain along the obturator nerve. In ANY child presenting with knee pain, especially if obesity or limited hip ROM is present, you MUST examine the hip. Missing SCFE can lead to avascular necrosis and hip destruction.

Investigations

Clinical Diagnosis

Sinding-Larsen-Johansson is a CLINICAL diagnosis. Imaging is NOT required in typical cases. Key clinical features (point tenderness over inferior pole of patella in athletic adolescent during growth spurt) are sufficient for diagnosis. Reserve imaging for atypical presentations or to exclude other pathology.

When to Order Imaging:

Indications for X-ray

  • Acute traumatic event (rule out avulsion fracture)
  • Atypical age (too young or too old for SLJ)
  • Night pain or rest pain (rule out tumor)
  • Effusion (unusual for SLJ)
  • Failure to improve with 3-6 months conservative treatment
  • Suspected loose ossicle in symptomatic adult

What X-rays Show

  • Soft tissue swelling anterior to inferior pole
  • Fragmentation of inferior pole ossification center
  • Irregular ossification of apophysis
  • Separate ossicle at inferior pole (may persist)
  • Calcification at inferior pole post-fusion

Other Imaging:

ModalityIndicationFindingsClinical Use
Lateral X-rayFirst-line if imaging neededSoft tissue swelling, fragmentation, ossicleConfirm diagnosis, rule out fracture
UltrasoundAssess patellar tendon, soft tissuesTendon thickening, fragmentation, bursaUseful if tendinopathy suspected
MRIRule out tumor, stress fracture, infectionEdema at inferior pole, soft tissue changesRarely needed - reserve for red flags

Management Algorithm

Non-Operative Management (First-Line for ALL Cases)

95%+ of SLJ resolves with conservative treatment alone.

Conservative Treatment Protocol

ImmediateActivity Modification
  • Do NOT stop all activity - reduce intensity and volume
  • Avoid painful activities (deep squats, jumping, kneeling)
  • Continue sport at reduced level if tolerable
  • Cross-train with low-impact activities (swimming, cycling)
  • Ice after activity (15-20 minutes) for symptom relief
OngoingFlexibility Program
  • Quadriceps stretching: Reduces traction force on inferior pole
  • Hamstring stretching: Decreases quadriceps demand
  • Hip flexor stretching: Improves mechanics
  • Hold stretches 30 seconds, 3-4 times daily
  • Dynamic warm-up before activity
GradualStrengthening
  • Eccentric quadriceps: Once acute pain settles
  • Core stability: Reduce load on knee during activity
  • Hip strengthening: Improve biomechanics
  • Progress gradually as symptoms allow
As NeededAdjuncts
  • Patellar strap/brace: Reduces traction on inferior pole
  • Knee pad: Protects inferior pole when kneeling
  • NSAIDs: Short-term for acute flares (not long-term)
  • Ice/heat: Symptom relief

Avoid Complete Rest

Prolonged complete rest is NOT recommended. It weakens muscles, detrains the athlete, and delays return to sport. Modify activity to a tolerable level rather than stopping entirely. The exception is severe cases with rest pain, which may need a short period of immobilization.

Return to Sport Protocol

PhaseCriteria to ProgressActivities AllowedDuration
1. Pain ControlPain-free daily activitiesStretching, non-impact exerciseUntil pain-free walking
2. StrengtheningPain-free exercises, full ROMEccentric exercises, light jogging2-4 weeks
3. Sport-SpecificPain-free jogging, 75% strengthDrills, non-contact practice2-4 weeks
4. Full ReturnFull training without symptomsFull competitionGradual return

Key Points for Return:

  • Return when pain-free during sport-specific activities
  • Gradual progression - increase volume before intensity
  • Expect ongoing mild symptoms during growth spurt
  • Patellar strap may be used during sport for protection
  • Condition fully resolves when patellar apophysis closes

Follow these principles for a safe and successful return to full activity.

Management of Severe or Refractory SLJ

For cases that don't respond to 3-6 months of conservative treatment:

Extended Conservative

  • Period of complete rest (2-4 weeks immobilization if needed)
  • Formal physiotherapy program
  • Address biomechanical contributing factors
  • Continued stretching and strengthening
  • May need to reduce sport intensity for entire season

Referral Indications

  • Symptoms persist beyond skeletal maturity
  • Failure of 6+ months conservative treatment
  • Suspected avulsion fracture
  • Concern for other pathology (tumor, infection)
  • Symptomatic ossicle in tendon (adults)

Surgical Excision - Rare

Surgery is almost never needed for SLJ in adolescents. In rare adults with persistent symptoms from a loose ossicle at the inferior pole, excision of the ossicle may be performed. This is typically arthroscopic or open with excellent outcomes. Surgery for acute symptoms in adolescents is NOT recommended.

Surgical Technique

Ossicle Excision (Adults Only)

Surgery Rarely Needed

Surgery for Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome is extremely rare and reserved for symptomatic ossicle in adults (post-skeletal maturity) or persistent pain from calcification. Surgery is NOT indicated for active SLJ in adolescents.

Indications:

  • Skeletal maturity (closed patellar apophysis)
  • Persistent focal pain over ossicle
  • Failed conservative management (6+ months)
  • Imaging confirms symptomatic ossicle at inferior pole

Technique:

  • Longitudinal or transverse incision over inferior pole
  • Identify ossicle at patellar tendon origin
  • Excise ossicle, debride tendon edges
  • Repair tendon if needed
  • Some surgeons also smooth prominent inferior pole

This is a straightforward procedure with excellent outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Surgical Outcomes

Results of Ossicle Excision:

  • 90%+ good/excellent results with pain relief
  • Return to sport typically 3-4 months postoperatively
  • Main complication: recurrent pain, rare extensor weakness

Patient Selection is Key:

  • Must be skeletally mature
  • Must have failed prolonged conservative management
  • Must have imaging-confirmed symptomatic ossicle

Most adolescents with SLJ do NOT require surgery and will resolve with conservative management alone.

Complications

Complications and Long-Term Sequelae of SLJ

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Persistent calcificationCommon (30-50%)Part of natural historyReassurance - cosmetic only, does not affect function
Inferior pole avulsion fractureRare (less than 1%)Acute trauma in severe SLJSurgical ORIF if displaced, cast if non-displaced
Symptomatic ossicle in adult5-10%Large initial ossicle, non-complianceOssicle excision if failed conservative treatment
Patellar tendinopathyUncommonReturn to sport too early, ongoing overuseEccentric loading program, activity modification
Pain with kneeling10-20%Calcification persistsKnee pads, reassurance, rarely surgical reduction

Avulsion Fracture Not Same as SLJ

Inferior pole avulsion fracture is DIFFERENT from SLJ. Avulsion is acute, traumatic, with sudden pain and inability to extend knee. It requires urgent orthopaedic referral. SLJ is chronic, overuse, with gradual onset and preserved extension. Do not confuse these conditions.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation for Ossicle Excision (Adults)

Post-Ossicle Excision Protocol

Protection PhaseWeek 0-2
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated
  • ROM exercises as comfort allows
  • Ice, elevation for swelling
  • Gentle quadriceps sets
Early RehabWeek 2-6
  • Full ROM expected by 6 weeks
  • Progressive strengthening
  • Bike, swimming for cardio
  • Avoid deep squats, jumping
Advanced RehabWeek 6-12
  • Sport-specific training
  • Plyometrics progression
  • Jogging, running progression
Return to SportWeek 12+
  • Full return based on strength testing
  • Typically 3-4 months for full competition
  • Ongoing maintenance stretching

Rehabilitation for Conservative SLJ (Adolescents)

This is the main patient population - structured rehab program while continuing modified activity:

  • Daily stretching: Quadriceps, hamstrings, hip flexors (30 sec × 3)
  • Eccentric strengthening: When acute pain settles
  • Core stability exercises
  • Sport modification: Continue at reduced level
  • Ice after activity
  • Gradual progression as symptoms allow

Outcomes

Long-Term Outcomes:

  • Excellent prognosis - most cases resolve completely with skeletal maturity
  • Symptoms typically improve within 1-2 years (when patellar apophysis fuses)
  • Persistent calcification at inferior pole is common but NOT a functional problem
  • Most athletes return to full sport without long-term issues
  • 5-10% have some adult symptoms, usually mild or related to ossicle

Predictors of Prolonged Course:

  • Severe initial presentation
  • Delay in activity modification
  • Ongoing intense sports participation without modification
  • Bilateral involvement
  • Coexisting Osgood-Schlatter disease

The Calcification is Normal

Parents often worry about the residual calcification at the inferior pole. Reassure them this is part of the normal healing process - the calcification represents bone that formed during the inflammatory phase and is now incorporated into the mature patella. It is cosmetic only and does not affect function or sports performance.

Evidence Base

Natural History of Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome

4
Medlar RC, Lyne ED • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1978)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 42 patients with SLJ
  • All patients had resolution of symptoms with skeletal maturity
  • Residual calcification at inferior pole common but asymptomatic
  • No long-term functional limitations
Clinical Implication: SLJ is a self-limiting condition with excellent long-term outcomes. Residual calcification is common but not functionally limiting.
Limitation: Retrospective case series without control group, older study.

Conservative Management Outcomes

5
Gholve PA et al • Curr Opin Pediatr (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of apophysitis management
  • Activity modification and stretching are mainstays of treatment
  • Complete rest not recommended - modify activity level
  • Surgery rarely indicated in adolescents
Clinical Implication: Conservative management with activity modification is effective. Avoid over-treatment - this is a self-limiting condition.
Limitation: Narrative review, not systematic review.

Patellar Strap Effectiveness in Apophysitis

2
Çelik A et al • J Pediatr Orthop B (2019)
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing patellar strap vs no strap in apophysitis
  • Patellar strap group had faster symptom resolution
  • Significant improvement in pain scores with strap use
  • Strap may reduce traction force on apophysis
Clinical Implication: Patellar straps are a reasonable adjunct to activity modification. May accelerate symptom resolution.
Limitation: Single-center RCT with relatively short follow-up.

Ossicle Excision in Adults

4
Pihlajamaki HK et al • Am J Sports Med (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective study of ossicle excision in military personnel
  • 89% good/excellent results at mean 10-year follow-up
  • Mean return to duty 3.4 months postoperatively
  • Low complication rate
Clinical Implication: Ossicle excision is effective for symptomatic adults who have failed conservative management.
Limitation: Military population may not generalize to all patients.

Risk Factors for Apophysitis

3
Rathleff MS et al • Br J Sports Med (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort study of 1854 adolescents
  • High sports participation volume associated with apophysitis
  • Quadriceps tightness was a significant risk factor
  • Rapid growth was associated with increased incidence
Clinical Implication: Prevention strategies should target flexibility and training load management during growth spurts.
Limitation: Association does not prove causation.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Presentation (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 12-year-old boy who plays basketball presents with 2 months of anterior knee pain. The pain is worse after training and he has point tenderness at the front of his knee."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is likely Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome, a traction apophysitis of the inferior pole of the patella. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would take a focused history - age (12 years is peak for SLJ), sport participation (basketball involves jumping), mechanism (gradual onset, activity-related), and pain characteristics. Second, I would examine the knee - specifically looking for point tenderness over the inferior pole of the patella, which is pathognomonic. I would test resisted knee extension which should reproduce the pain. I would also examine the hip to rule out referred pain from SCFE. Third, I would confirm this is a clinical diagnosis - imaging is not required for typical presentations. My management would be conservative: activity modification (not complete rest), quadriceps and hamstring stretching, ice after activity, and possibly a patellar strap during sport. I would counsel the patient and parents that this is self-limiting and will resolve when he stops growing, typically within 1-2 years.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Clinical diagnosis based on point tenderness over inferior pole
Self-limiting condition, resolves with skeletal maturity
Activity modification, NOT complete rest
Stretching and ice are mainstays of treatment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ordering unnecessary imaging for typical presentation
✗Recommending complete rest from sport
✗Missing hip pathology - always examine hip in pediatric knee pain
✗Confusing with Osgood-Schlatter (different location)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if he had acute traumatic onset?"
"When would you order X-rays?"
"What is the long-term prognosis?"
"How does this differ from Osgood-Schlatter disease?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Coexisting Conditions (~3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 13-year-old female gymnast presents with bilateral anterior knee pain. On examination, she has tenderness at both the inferior pole of the patella and the tibial tubercle bilaterally."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has both Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome and Osgood-Schlatter disease affecting both knees. This represents traction apophysitis at both ends of the patellar tendon - the origin (inferior pole) and the insertion (tibial tubercle). I would take a systematic approach: First, I would confirm the diagnosis by examining for point tenderness at both locations, which should reproduce pain with resisted knee extension. Second, I would assess severity - bilateral involvement suggests high training load. I would ask about training volume and recent changes. Third, my management would address both conditions simultaneously with the same conservative principles: activity modification to reduce load on the entire extensor mechanism, aggressive stretching program for quadriceps and hamstrings, ice after activity, and patellar straps during training. I would also discuss with the family about training volume - 20+ hours per week may need reduction. I would counsel that both conditions are self-limiting and will resolve with skeletal maturity, but the high training load may prolong symptoms. I would arrange formal physiotherapy for a structured program.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Both SLJ and OSD can coexist - same mechanism, different locations
Bilateral involvement suggests high training load
Address both conditions with same conservative principles
May need to address training volume with family and coaches
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing one of the conditions
✗Not addressing the underlying cause (training load)
✗Recommending surgery prematurely
✗Not examining hips for referred pain
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if symptoms persist despite conservative management?"
"How would you modify her training program?"
"When would you consider imaging?"
"What is the prognosis for bilateral involvement?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Avulsion Fracture (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 14-year-old basketball player jumps for a rebound and lands with sudden severe knee pain. He cannot extend his knee and you notice tenderness and swelling over the inferior pole of the patella."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for an inferior pole patellar avulsion fracture, which is a surgical emergency. This is DIFFERENT from Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome in several key ways: First, the mechanism is ACUTE traumatic (jumping/landing) versus insidious overuse in SLJ. Second, there is sudden severe pain versus gradual activity-related pain. Third, inability to extend the knee suggests disruption of the extensor mechanism - this does NOT occur in SLJ. Fourth, the acute onset with trauma is characteristic of avulsion. My immediate management would be: immobilize the leg in extension with a splint, ice and elevation, urgent X-rays (lateral view will show displaced inferior pole fragment), and urgent orthopaedic referral for surgical fixation. I would assess neurovascular status and document. I would counsel the patient and family that this requires surgical fixation to restore the extensor mechanism, and warn about potential complications including growth disturbance if the physis is involved, stiffness, and the need for hardware removal.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Avulsion fracture is ACUTE traumatic, different from chronic SLJ
Inability to extend knee suggests extensor mechanism disruption
Urgent orthopaedic referral for surgical fixation
Warn about growth disturbance in skeletally immature patients
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing acute avulsion with chronic SLJ
✗Delaying orthopaedic referral
✗Missing neurovascular injury
✗Not immobilizing in extension
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you classify inferior pole avulsion fractures?"
"What is the typical surgical approach?"
"What are the risks of growth disturbance?"
"How would you manage post-operatively?"

MCQ Practice Points

Distinguishing SLJ from Avulsion

Q: An adolescent presents with knee pain after jumping. How do you distinguish SLJ from avulsion fracture? A: SLJ has GRADUAL onset, pain during/after activity, ability to extend knee, and no visible deformity. Avulsion has ACUTE onset after trauma, inability to extend knee, visible/palpable deformity, and severe pain. X-ray shows displaced fragment in avulsion vs fragmentation in SLJ.

When to Image

Q: Which of the following is an indication for X-ray in suspected SLJ? A: Night pain (rule out tumor), acute traumatic onset (rule out avulsion), failure to improve after 6 months conservative treatment, atypical age (less than 8 or after skeletal maturity). Routine SLJ does NOT require imaging.

Treatment Approach

Q: What is the recommended activity level for adolescent with SLJ? A: Activity MODIFICATION, not complete rest. Continue sport at reduced level if tolerable. Avoid painful activities (deep squats, kneeling, jumping). Cross-train with low-impact activities. Complete rest weakens muscles and delays return.

Natural History

Q: What happens to the calcification after SLJ resolves? A: The inferior pole calcification typically persists as a painless, cosmetic finding in 30-50% of patients. This represents ossification that occurred during the healing process and is now incorporated into the mature patella. It is NOT a complication and does not affect function.

Differential Diagnosis

Q: A 12-year-old with knee pain has point tenderness at the INFERIOR POLE of patella. What is the diagnosis? A: Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome - traction apophysitis at the inferior pole of patella (where patellar tendon originates). Same mechanism as Osgood-Schlatter but at the proximal end of the patellar tendon. Treatment is identical - activity modification, stretching, ice.

Relationship to OSD

Q: How does SLJ differ from Osgood-Schlatter disease? A: SLJ affects the inferior pole of the patella (patellar tendon origin) while OSD affects the tibial tubercle (patellar tendon insertion). Both are traction apophysitides with the same mechanism, age group, and treatment. Patients may have both conditions simultaneously.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Epidemiology in Australia

  • Common in Australian adolescents, particularly in popular sports (AFL, soccer, basketball, netball)
  • Equal or increasing incidence in females with increased sports participation
  • Managed primarily in general practice and sports medicine clinics

Access to Care

  • Most cases managed in primary care without specialist referral
  • Physiotherapy widely available through Medicare (5 sessions under Chronic Disease Management plan) or private
  • Sports medicine physicians manage more complex cases
  • Orthopaedic referral rare - mainly for suspected avulsion or refractory adult symptoms

Medicolegal Considerations:

Key Documentation Requirements

Key documentation points:

  • Clear history of gradual onset and activity-related symptoms
  • Documentation of point tenderness specifically over inferior pole of patella
  • Hip examination performed (to exclude SCFE/Perthes)
  • Discussion of self-limiting nature and expected timeline
  • Activity modification advice given (not complete rest)

Don't Miss SCFE: SCFE commonly presents as knee pain in obese adolescent males. Missing SCFE diagnosis causes significant morbidity from AVN. Document hip examination in ALL adolescents presenting with knee pain. This is a frequent source of litigation in pediatric orthopaedics.

Prevention Strategies:

  • Sports Medicine Australia guidelines emphasize load management
  • School and club sports programs increasingly aware of growth spurt risks
  • Pre-season screening programs may identify at-risk athletes

SINDING-LARSEN-JOHANSSON SYNDROME

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Inferior pole of patella = patellar tendon origin
  • •Secondary ossification center at inferior pole
  • •Apophysis fuses during adolescence (14-18 years)
  • •Opposite end of patellar tendon from Osgood-Schlatter

Diagnosis

  • •Clinical diagnosis - imaging not required
  • •Point tenderness over inferior pole of patella
  • •Pain with resisted knee extension
  • •10-14 years, athletic, growth spurt

Treatment

  • •Activity MODIFICATION not complete rest
  • •Stretching: quads, hamstrings, hip flexors
  • •Ice after activity (15-20 min)
  • •Patellar strap during sport
  • •NSAIDs short-term for flares only

Imaging Indications

  • •Acute traumatic onset (avulsion)
  • •Night pain (tumor)
  • •Failure after 6 months conservative
  • •Atypical age or presentation

Red Flags

  • •Acute trauma with inability to extend = AVULSION
  • •Night/rest pain = tumor, infection
  • •Knee effusion = not typical for SLJ
  • •Hip symptoms = SCFE, Perthes

Prognosis

  • •90%+ resolve with skeletal maturity
  • •Duration 1-2 years (until physis closes)
  • •Calcification persists but is painless
  • •5-10% adult symptoms (usually ossicle)
Quick Stats
Reading Time95 min
Related Topics

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Atlantoaxial Instability

Blount Disease (Tibia Vara)

Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy