Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

Comprehensive guide to sinus tarsi syndrome - anatomy, post-traumatic etiology, clinical diagnosis, imaging, conservative management, and surgical debridement for FRACS exam preparation.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

SINUS TARSI SYNDROME

Post-Traumatic Lateral Hindfoot Pain | Sinus Tarsi Tenderness | Conservative First

1-2%Of all chronic ankle sprains
30-50%After severe ankle inversion
70-80%Respond to conservative treatment
20-30%Require surgical debridement

Clinical Severity Classification

Acute
PatternUnder 3 months post-injury
TreatmentRest, physiotherapy, NSAIDs
Subacute
Pattern3-6 months, persistent symptoms
TreatmentInjection therapy, orthotics
Chronic
PatternOver 6 months, failed conservative
TreatmentConsider arthroscopic debridement

Critical Must-Knows

  • Sinus Tarsi Anatomy: Conical tunnel between talus and calcaneus, contains interosseous talocalcaneal ligament, cervical ligament, fat, and mechanoreceptors
  • Post-Traumatic Etiology: 90% follow ankle inversion injury - disrupts ligaments and fat pad
  • Clinical Triad: Lateral hindfoot pain, sinus tarsi tenderness, sensation of hindfoot instability
  • MRI Findings: High signal in sinus tarsi on T2, ligament disruption, fat pad edema
  • Conservative First: 70-80% respond to physiotherapy, injections, and proprioceptive training

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Sinus tarsi is anterior and lateral to lateral malleolus
  • "
    Pain worse on uneven ground and lateral movements
  • "
    Single-leg stance reveals hindfoot instability
  • "
    Diagnostic injection provides immediate but temporary relief

Critical Sinus Tarsi Syndrome Exam Points

Anatomy Location

Sinus tarsi is a cone-shaped tunnel located between the talus superiorly and calcaneus inferiorly, opening laterally anterior to the lateral malleolus. Contains the interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL), cervical ligament, inferior extensor retinaculum, fat pad, and rich mechanoreceptors. Injury disrupts proprioception.

Post-Traumatic Origin

90% follow ankle inversion injury. The mechanism is forceful inversion that crushes the lateral structures of the sinus tarsi, disrupting ligaments and fat pad. Chronic inflammation, synovitis, and adhesions develop. Often associated with lateral ankle instability.

Clinical Diagnosis

Triad: Vague lateral hindfoot pain, point tenderness over sinus tarsi, and sensation of instability on uneven ground. Pain reproduced by forced inversion and eversion. Negative anterior drawer (unless coexisting ATFL injury). MRI confirms with high T2 signal in sinus tarsi.

Conservative First

70-80% respond to non-operative treatment. Physiotherapy with proprioceptive training is key. Diagnostic and therapeutic corticosteroid injection into sinus tarsi provides temporary relief and confirms diagnosis. Surgery reserved for refractory cases after 6 months.

Quick Decision Guide - Management Based on Duration and Severity

PhaseClinical FeaturesManagementKey Pearl
Acute (under 3 months)Recent inversion injury, lateral painRest, NSAIDs, physiotherapy, ankle braceMost resolve with conservative treatment
Subacute (3-6 months)Persistent pain, sinus tarsi tendernessCorticosteroid injection, proprioceptive trainingInjection confirms diagnosis if relief obtained
Chronic (over 6 months)Failed conservative, MRI shows synovitisArthroscopic sinus tarsi debridementExclude subtalar arthritis before surgery
Mnemonic

SINUSSinus Tarsi Contents

S
Synovium
Lining of subtalar joint extension
I
Interosseous talocalcaneal ligament
Main stabilizer of subtalar joint
N
Nerve endings
Rich mechanoreceptors for proprioception
U
Underbelly - Fat pad
Adipose tissue - acts as shock absorber
S
Soft tissue - Cervical ligament
Lateral reinforcement of subtalar joint

Memory Hook:The SINUS contains five key structures - disruption causes pain and instability!

Mnemonic

TENDERClinical Features of Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

T
Tenderness over sinus tarsi
Anterior to lateral malleolus, exquisitely tender
E
Eversion and inversion pain
Forced movements reproduce symptoms
N
Negative anterior drawer
Unless coexisting lateral ankle instability
D
Deep aching pain
Vague, poorly localized lateral hindfoot pain
E
Exacerbated by uneven ground
Worse on slopes, stairs, uneven surfaces
R
Recent inversion injury
90% have history of ankle sprain

Memory Hook:The sinus tarsi is TENDER to palpation - this is the pathognomonic clinical sign!

Mnemonic

LATERALDifferential Diagnosis

L
Ligament injury (ATFL)
Lateral ankle instability - positive drawer
A
Arthritis (subtalar)
Degenerative changes - worse outcomes
T
Tarsal coalition
Congenital - rigid flat foot
E
Extensor tendonitis
EDB, peroneal tendons
R
Radiculopathy (L5-S1)
Check back, dermatomal pattern
A
Arthropathy (inflammatory)
Rheumatoid, seronegative
L
Lesion (bone tumor)
Red flags - night pain, systemic symptoms

Memory Hook:LATERAL foot pain has many causes - exclude these before diagnosing sinus tarsi syndrome!

Overview and Epidemiology

Clinical Significance

Sinus tarsi syndrome is an underdiagnosed cause of chronic lateral ankle pain following inversion injury. The syndrome was first described by O'Connor in 1958 as a clinical entity distinct from lateral ankle ligament injury. It represents chronic inflammation and scarring within the sinus tarsi following disruption of its contents. The vague nature of symptoms and lack of specific tests lead to delayed diagnosis averaging 6-12 months from injury.

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: 1-2% of all chronic ankle sprains develop sinus tarsi syndrome
  • Post-inversion: 30-50% after severe ankle inversion injury if untreated
  • Age: Peak 20-40 years (active population)
  • Sex: Equal male and female distribution
  • Athletic: Common in runners, soccer players, basketball
  • Bilateral: 10-15% have bilateral involvement

Young active individuals with history of ankle sprains are typical.

Risk Factors

Predisposing factors:

  • Previous ankle inversion injury (90% of cases)
  • Chronic lateral ankle instability
  • Repetitive microtrauma (running, jumping)
  • Hindfoot valgus alignment
  • Generalized ligamentous laxity
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (RA, seronegative)

Protective factors:

  • Proper ankle rehabilitation after sprains
  • Proprioceptive training
  • Ankle bracing during sports

History of inadequately rehabilitated ankle sprain is almost universal.

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Sinus Tarsi Anatomy

Sinus Tarsi Boundaries

The sinus tarsi is a cone-shaped tunnel between the talus and calcaneus. The wide opening faces laterally (anterior and inferior to lateral malleolus). The narrow apex points medially and becomes the tarsal canal (containing posterior tibial neurovascular bundle). Boundaries: Superior - neck and body of talus. Inferior - superior surface of calcaneus. Medial - tarsal canal. Lateral - opens between anterior process of calcaneus and talar neck.

Sinus Tarsi Contents:

StructureAnatomyFunctionInjury Effect
Interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL)Strong ligament in tarsal canal, two bandsPrimary stabilizer of subtalar jointDisruption causes subtalar instability
Cervical ligamentOblique ligament from talar neck to calcaneusRestricts inversion, secondary stabilizerInjury common in inversion sprains
Inferior extensor retinaculumCrosses lateral opening of sinus tarsiRestrains extensor tendonsThickening contributes to stenosis
Fat padAdipose tissue filling the sinusShock absorption, gliding surfaceInflammation, fibrosis after trauma
MechanoreceptorsDense proprioceptive nerve endingsProprioception for hindfoot positionLoss causes instability sensation
Synovial tissueExtension of subtalar joint synoviumJoint lubricationChronic synovitis, adhesions

Clinical Relevance:

  • The sinus tarsi is palpable anterior to the lateral malleolus
  • Depth: approximately 1-2 cm from skin surface
  • Width at lateral opening: 1-2 cm diameter
  • Rich vascular and nerve supply explains pain severity

Pathophysiology

Acute Injury Phase

Initial trauma (ankle inversion):

  • Forced inversion crushes lateral sinus tarsi structures
  • Disruption of cervical and interosseous ligaments
  • Fat pad contusion and hemorrhage
  • Synovial membrane inflammation
  • Nerve ending trauma

This acute phase lasts 2-6 weeks.

Chronic Phase

Chronic inflammation develops:

  • Persistent synovitis
  • Fibrosis and adhesions
  • Scar tissue formation
  • Fat pad degeneration
  • Loss of proprioceptive function
  • Secondary subtalar instability

Chronic changes perpetuate symptoms beyond 3-6 months.

Proposed Mechanisms:

  1. Mechanical compression: Inversion crushes lateral sinus tarsi contents between talus and calcaneus
  2. Ligamentous disruption: Cervical and ITCL partial tears lead to microinstability
  3. Proprioceptive loss: Mechanoreceptor damage causes subjective instability and poor proprioception
  4. Inflammatory cascade: Chronic synovitis perpetuates pain
  5. Scar tissue stenosis: Adhesions narrow the sinus tarsi, causing impingement

Classification Systems

Classification by Duration

Temporal Stages

StageDurationPathologyTreatment Approach
AcuteUnder 3 monthsAcute inflammation, edemaConservative - rest, NSAIDs, physio
Subacute3-6 monthsPersistent synovitis, early fibrosisInjection therapy, proprioceptive training
ChronicOver 6 monthsFibrosis, adhesions, stenosisConsider surgical debridement

Stage determines management approach and prognosis.

Etiological Classification

TypeCauseFrequencyAssociated Findings
Post-traumaticAnkle inversion injury90% of casesMay have coexisting lateral instability
InflammatoryRA, seronegative arthropathy5% of casesBilateral, systemic features
DegenerativeSubtalar arthritis3% of casesOlder age, worse prognosis
IdiopathicNo clear precipitant2% of casesDiagnosis of exclusion

Post-traumatic etiology has best prognosis with treatment.

MRI-Based Severity

Sinus tarsi inflammation grading:

GradeMRI FindingsClinical Correlation
1 (Mild)High T2 signal in fat pad onlyEarly phase, good conservative prognosis
2 (Moderate)Fat pad edema plus ligament signal changeSubacute, may require injection
3 (Severe)Complete ligament disruption, synovitis, stenosisChronic, surgical candidate

Higher MRI grade correlates with chronicity and need for surgery.

Clinical Assessment

History

Classic presentation:

  • Pain location: Vague lateral hindfoot pain anterior to lateral malleolus
  • Character: Deep, aching, poorly localized
  • Onset: Gradual after ankle inversion injury (weeks to months)
  • Aggravating factors: Uneven ground, stairs, slopes, lateral movements
  • Associated symptoms: Sensation of instability, giving way
  • Previous injury: 90% report ankle sprain 3-12 months prior

The triad of lateral pain, sinus tarsi tenderness, and instability sensation is pathognomonic.

Examination

Key findings:

  • Inspection: Usually normal, may have mild lateral swelling
  • Palpation: Exquisite point tenderness over sinus tarsi (anterior to lateral malleolus)
  • Range of motion: Subtalar motion painful at extremes of inversion and eversion
  • Forced inversion test: Reproduces pain in sinus tarsi
  • Forced eversion test: Also reproduces pain
  • Anterior drawer: Usually negative unless coexisting ATFL injury
  • Single-leg stance: Reveals proprioceptive deficit, hindfoot instability

Sinus tarsi point tenderness is the most reliable clinical sign.

Special Tests

Clinical Tests for Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

TestTechniquePositive FindingSensitivity/Specificity
Sinus tarsi palpationPress 1 cm anterior and inferior to lateral malleolusExquisite point tendernessHigh sensitivity (over 90%), moderate specificity
Forced inversionPassively invert hindfoot, apply axial pressurePain reproduced in sinus tarsiModerate sensitivity and specificity
Forced eversionPassively evert hindfootPain in sinus tarsi (compression of lateral contents)Lower sensitivity than inversion
Single-leg stanceStand on affected leg 30 secondsDifficulty maintaining balance, subjective instabilityReflects proprioceptive deficit
Diagnostic injectionInject 2 mL lidocaine into sinus tarsiImmediate pain relief confirms diagnosisHigh specificity (over 90%)

Differential Diagnosis

Must exclude:

  • Lateral ankle instability: Positive anterior drawer, talar tilt. May coexist with sinus tarsi syndrome.
  • Subtalar arthritis: Older age, crepitus, reduced subtalar motion. X-ray shows joint space narrowing.
  • Peroneal tendinopathy: Tenderness posterior to lateral malleolus, pain with resisted eversion.
  • Stress fracture: Calcaneus, talus. High index of suspicion in athletes. MRI shows bone marrow edema.
  • Tarsal coalition: Rigid flat foot, usually younger age. CT diagnostic.
  • L5-S1 radiculopathy: Back pain, dermatomal sensory loss, weakness.

Coexisting lateral ankle instability is found in 30-40% and should be addressed surgically if present.

Investigations

Investigation Algorithm

First LineClinical Diagnosis

Diagnosis is primarily clinical based on history (post-inversion lateral hindfoot pain) and examination (sinus tarsi point tenderness). No investigations required if typical presentation and good response to initial conservative treatment.

Initial ImagingPlain Radiographs

Weight-bearing AP, lateral, and mortise ankle views:

  • Usually normal in sinus tarsi syndrome
  • Exclude fractures, arthritis, tarsal coalition
  • Assess hindfoot alignment (valgus, varus)
  • Check for talar tilt (lateral instability)

Findings: Normal in isolated sinus tarsi syndrome. May show signs of chronic lateral instability.

Diagnostic ConfirmationMRI Ankle

Gold standard for diagnosis:

T2-weighted sequences show:

  • High signal intensity in sinus tarsi (edema, inflammation)
  • Fat pad signal changes
  • Disruption of cervical ligament
  • ITCL abnormalities
  • Synovitis, fluid in subtalar joint
  • Exclude subtalar arthritis

Sensitivity 80-90% for sinus tarsi pathology.

Confirmatory TestDiagnostic Injection

Ultrasound or fluoroscopy-guided injection:

  • 2 mL 1% lidocaine into sinus tarsi
  • Immediate pain relief confirms diagnosis
  • Can combine with corticosteroid for therapeutic effect

Specificity over 90% - positive response confirms sinus tarsi syndrome as pain source.

MRI Findings

Typical findings:

  • High T2 signal in sinus tarsi (greater than 90%)
  • Fat pad edema and inflammation
  • Cervical ligament disruption or thickening
  • ITCL signal abnormality
  • Subtalar joint effusion
  • Synovial thickening

Sensitivity: 80-90% for diagnosis

Ultrasound

Dynamic assessment:

  • Evaluate sinus tarsi soft tissues
  • Assess cervical ligament integrity
  • Identify fluid collections
  • Guide injection placement

Advantages: Dynamic, real-time, cost-effective. Operator-dependent.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
sinus tarsi syndrome management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for sinus tarsi syndromeCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management (First-Line)

Initial Management (Under 3 Months)

Goal: Reduce inflammation, restore proprioception, prevent chronicity

Conservative Protocol

ImmediateActivity Modification
  • Reduce impact activities
  • Avoid uneven surfaces
  • Use lateral ankle brace or taping
  • Continue non-impact exercise (swimming, cycling)

Relative rest allows acute inflammation to settle.

First 4-6 WeeksAnti-Inflammatory Measures
  • NSAIDs: Regular dosing for 3-4 weeks
  • Ice therapy: 15 minutes 3-4 times daily
  • Compression: Ankle sleeve or wrap

Controls acute inflammatory response.

Week 2-12Physiotherapy

Key interventions:

  • Range of motion: Subtalar joint mobility exercises
  • Strengthening: Peroneal and tibialis posterior strengthening
  • Proprioceptive training: Balance board, single-leg stance (critical)
  • Manual therapy: Soft tissue mobilization

Proprioceptive retraining is the most important component.

OngoingOrthotics
  • Lateral wedge: Reduces inversion stress
  • Cushioned heel: Shock absorption
  • Arch support: Controls excessive pronation

Biomechanical support reduces sinus tarsi loading.

Expected outcome: 50-60% improve with conservative treatment alone within 3 months.

Corticosteroid Injection (3-6 Months Persistent)

Indications:

  • Persistent symptoms after 3 months conservative treatment
  • MRI confirms sinus tarsi inflammation
  • Diagnostic confirmation needed
  • Bridge to surgery or definitive treatment

Technique:

Injection Protocol

SetupPreparation
  • Patient supine or lateral decubitus
  • Mark sinus tarsi (anterior and inferior to lateral malleolus)
  • Ultrasound or fluoroscopy guidance preferred
  • Sterile technique
ProcedureInjection
  • Needle: 23-25 gauge, 3-4 cm length
  • Approach: Lateral, directed posteromedially
  • Depth: 1-2 cm to sinus tarsi
  • Medication: 40 mg methylprednisolone plus 1-2 mL 1% lidocaine
  • Confirm placement by lack of resistance

Immediate pain relief with lidocaine confirms correct placement.

AftercarePost-Injection
  • Rest for 48 hours
  • Avoid impact for 2 weeks
  • Resume physiotherapy after 1 week
  • Reassess at 6 weeks

Outcomes:

  • 60-70% achieve good to excellent relief
  • Duration of effect: 3-6 months typically
  • May repeat once if good initial response
  • Limit to 2-3 injections lifetime

Positive response to injection supports diagnosis and predicts good surgical outcome if needed.

Adjunctive Therapies

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

Emerging option:

  • Growth factors stimulate healing
  • May have longer duration than steroid
  • Technique similar to steroid injection
  • Limited evidence in sinus tarsi syndrome
  • Not PBS-funded (500-800 AUD)

Case series show promising results but RCT data lacking.

Prolotherapy

Regenerative injection:

  • Dextrose or platelet lysate
  • Stimulates ligament healing
  • Multiple injections required
  • Limited evidence
  • Emerging option for refractory cases

More data needed before routine recommendation.

These conservative options complete the first-line management approach.

Surgical Technique - Arthroscopic Sinus Tarsi Debridement

Indications for Surgery

Strict Criteria for Surgical Intervention

All of the following must be met:

  • Minimum 6 months failed conservative treatment
  • Documented compliance with physiotherapy and proprioceptive training
  • Failed injection therapy (at least one corticosteroid injection)
  • MRI confirms sinus tarsi pathology (synovitis, adhesions)
  • Pain significantly limiting activities
  • Exclusion of subtalar arthritis (poor surgical outcomes)

Contraindications:

  • Active infection
  • Subtalar arthritis (consider arthrodesis instead)
  • Inadequate conservative trial
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (higher failure rate)
  • Unrealistic expectations

Arthroscopic Sinus Tarsi Debridement

Advantages over open:

  • Smaller incisions
  • Less soft tissue disruption
  • Faster recovery
  • Better visualization
  • Lower complication rate

Surgical Steps

SetupPositioning
  • Lateral decubitus position with affected side up
  • Beanbag or lateral positioning device
  • Thigh tourniquet applied
  • Ankle and foot prepped free
  • C-arm available for portal placement
Step 1Portal Placement

Anterolateral portal:

  • Just anterior to tip of lateral malleolus
  • At level of ankle joint
  • For visualization

Sinus tarsi portal:

  • 1-2 cm anterior and inferior to lateral malleolus
  • Directly into sinus tarsi opening
  • For instrumentation

Mark portals before inflation to identify landmarks.

Step 2Arthroscopic Debridement
  • Insert 2.7 mm 30-degree arthroscope via anterolateral portal
  • Navigate to sinus tarsi
  • Inspect contents: Synovitis, adhesions, scar tissue
  • Switch to sinus tarsi portal for direct access
  • Debride inflamed synovium with shaver
  • Remove scar tissue and adhesions
  • Preserve cervical and ITCL ligaments (do not excise)
  • Irrigate thoroughly

Goal is debridement of pathologic tissue while preserving ligamentous stability.

Step 3Assess Subtalar Joint
  • View subtalar joint through sinus tarsi
  • Assess for articular cartilage damage
  • If significant arthritis, reconsider surgical plan
  • May require arthrodesis instead
Step 4Closure
  • Irrigate portals
  • Close skin only with nylon suture
  • Soft compressive dressing
  • Non-weight bearing for first week in boot

Minimal closure required for arthroscopic technique.

Key technical points:

  • Preserve ligaments - debride synovium and scar only
  • Thorough debridement of all inflamed tissue
  • Assess subtalar joint for arthritis
  • Gentle technique to avoid iatrogenic damage

These steps ensure optimal outcomes while preserving stability.

Open Sinus Tarsi Debridement

Indications:

  • Failed arthroscopic debridement
  • Need for extensive debridement
  • Surgeon preference or lack of arthroscopy equipment
  • Concurrent lateral ligament reconstruction

Open Technique

Step 1Incision
  • Oblique incision over sinus tarsi
  • 3-4 cm length
  • Anterior and inferior to lateral malleolus
  • Parallel to peroneal tendons
Step 2Exposure
  • Dissect through subcutaneous tissue
  • Identify and protect superficial peroneal nerve branches
  • Retract extensor digitorum brevis
  • Identify sinus tarsi opening
Step 3Debridement
  • Explore sinus tarsi contents
  • Excise inflamed fat pad
  • Debride synovium and scar tissue
  • Preserve cervical and ITCL ligaments
  • Curettage of any bony spurs
Step 4Concurrent Procedures

If lateral ankle instability present:

  • Brostrom repair of ATFL and CFL
  • Tighten lateral structures
  • Augment with suture tape if needed
Step 5Closure
  • Irrigate wound
  • Close subcutaneous tissue with absorbable suture
  • Skin closure with nylon
  • Below-knee cast or boot, non-weight bearing

Open technique requires longer immobilization than arthroscopic.

Recovery slower than arthroscopic but allows concurrent lateral ligament reconstruction if needed.

Subtalar Arthrodesis (If Arthritis Present)

Indication: Sinus tarsi syndrome with concomitant subtalar arthritis

Consideration:

  • Debridement alone fails if arthritis present
  • Subtalar fusion addresses both pain sources
  • Higher patient satisfaction than debridement in arthritis

Technique:

  • Lateral approach to subtalar joint
  • Debride articular cartilage to subchondral bone
  • Insert two 7.0 mm cannulated screws
  • Bone graft if bone loss present

Subtalar arthrodesis is definitive treatment when arthritis coexists with sinus tarsi syndrome.

Complications

Surgical Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Persistent pain (incomplete relief)20-30%Subtalar arthritis, inflammatory arthropathy, inadequate debridementReassess for missed pathology, consider subtalar arthrodesis
Superficial peroneal nerve injury5-10%Open technique, inadequate visualizationNumbness dorsum of foot. Usually recovers 3-6 months. Desensitization if persistent
Wound complications5%Open surgery, smoking, diabetesWound care, antibiotics if infection. Delayed healing common with open technique
Subtalar stiffness10-15%Aggressive debridement, prolonged immobilizationPhysiotherapy, mobilization. Rarely clinically significant
Recurrence10-20%Incomplete debridement, untreated instabilityRevision debridement or consider arthrodesis
Iatrogenic instabilityRare (under 5%)Excessive ligament excisionPrevention: Preserve cervical and ITCL. Treatment: Lateral ligament reconstruction

Preventing Persistent Pain

Most common cause of surgical failure is unrecognized subtalar arthritis. Preoperative MRI must assess subtalar joint cartilage. If arthritis present, counsel patient that debridement alone has 40-60% failure rate, and subtalar arthrodesis may be necessary.

Other causes of persistent pain:

  • Incomplete debridement of pathologic tissue
  • Coexisting lateral ankle instability not addressed
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (RA, seronegative)
  • Wrong diagnosis (L5-S1 radiculopathy, peroneal pathology)

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Debridement

Immediate Post-opWeek 0-2
  • Below-knee boot or CAM walker
  • Non-weight bearing first week
  • Partial weight-bearing week 2 (if minimal pain)
  • Elevate, ice, analgesia
  • Ankle pumps and toe exercises
  • Sutures removed at 2 weeks
Early MobilizationWeeks 2-6
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated in boot
  • Begin gentle range of motion exercises
  • Subtalar mobilization (plantarflexion-inversion, dorsiflexion-eversion)
  • Proprioceptive training: Balance board, single-leg stance
  • Continue ice and elevation

Proprioceptive retraining is critical to prevent recurrence.

Progressive StrengtheningWeeks 6-12
  • Wean from boot to supportive shoes
  • Progressive strengthening: Peroneal, tibialis posterior
  • Advance proprioception: Unstable surfaces, eyes closed
  • Start low-impact activities (swimming, cycling)
  • Gradual return to walking, then light jogging

Most patients return to full activity by 3 months.

Return to SportMonths 3-6
  • Sport-specific training from month 3
  • Continue proprioceptive maintenance
  • May require ankle brace initially for high-risk sports
  • Full return to sport 4-6 months typically

Athletes return to competitive sport by 4-6 months in most cases.

Rehabilitation After Open Debridement

ImmobilizationWeeks 0-2
  • Below-knee cast or rigid boot
  • Non-weight bearing with crutches
  • Elevate above heart level
  • Ice therapy
  • Analgesia as needed
Protected MobilizationWeeks 2-6
  • Transition to CAM boot at 2 weeks
  • Partial weight-bearing weeks 3-4
  • Full weight-bearing weeks 5-6
  • Begin gentle range of motion
  • Proprioceptive training
StrengtheningWeeks 6-12
  • Progress to supportive shoes
  • Strengthening program
  • Advanced proprioception
  • Swimming, cycling
  • Walking program

Recovery slower than arthroscopic due to soft tissue disruption.

Return to ActivityMonths 3-6
  • Gradual return to impact activities
  • Sport-specific training
  • Full return 5-6 months (longer than arthroscopic)

Open technique typically adds 4-6 weeks to recovery compared to arthroscopic.

Expected Outcomes

Success rates:

  • Arthroscopic debridement: 70-80% good to excellent
  • Open debridement: 65-75% good to excellent
  • Best outcomes: Post-traumatic, no arthritis
  • Poorer outcomes: Inflammatory arthropathy, subtalar arthritis

Return to activity:

  • Walking: 6-8 weeks
  • Running: 3-4 months
  • Full sports: 4-6 months

Red Flags Post-op

Contact surgeon if:

  • Increasing pain after initial improvement
  • Signs of infection (fever, drainage, erythema)
  • No improvement by 3 months
  • New instability or giving way
  • Numbness or tingling (nerve injury)
  • Unable to bear weight by 6 weeks

Early identification prevents complications.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors

Predictors of Outcome

Good PrognosisPoor Prognosis
Post-traumatic etiologyInflammatory arthropathy (RA, seronegative)
Early diagnosis and treatment (under 6 months)Chronic symptoms (over 12 months)
MRI shows isolated sinus tarsi inflammationSubtalar arthritis on MRI
Good response to diagnostic injectionNo response to injection
Compliance with physiotherapyPoor compliance, inadequate rehab
Young age (under 40)Older age (over 50)

Key Prognostic Indicators

Best outcomes:

  • Post-traumatic sinus tarsi syndrome without arthritis
  • Early treatment (within 6 months of symptom onset)
  • Good compliance with proprioceptive training
  • Positive response to diagnostic injection

Worst outcomes:

  • Concomitant subtalar arthritis (consider arthrodesis instead)
  • Inflammatory arthropathy as underlying cause
  • Chronic symptoms over 12 months
  • Failed multiple injection attempts

The presence of subtalar arthritis on MRI is the single strongest predictor of poor outcome with debridement alone.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Sinus Tarsi Syndrome: MRI Findings and Clinical Correlation

3
Lektrakul N et al • Radiology (2001)
Key Findings:
  • MRI study of 50 patients with clinically diagnosed sinus tarsi syndrome
  • Sensitivity of MRI for sinus tarsi pathology: 84%
  • Commonest finding: High T2 signal in fat pad (92%)
  • Cervical ligament abnormalities in 68% of cases
  • Subtalar joint effusion in 56%
Clinical Implication: MRI has high sensitivity for diagnosing sinus tarsi syndrome. High T2 signal in sinus tarsi is the hallmark finding.
Limitation: Retrospective study. Some MRI findings may be incidental in asymptomatic individuals.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

4
Frey C et al • Foot Ankle Int (1999)
Key Findings:
  • Case series of 49 patients undergoing arthroscopic sinus tarsi debridement
  • Mean follow-up 3.2 years
  • Good to excellent results in 74% of patients
  • Best results in post-traumatic etiology (85% success)
  • Poor results if subtalar arthritis present (40% success)
  • Complication rate 8% (nerve injury, persistent pain)
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic debridement is effective for post-traumatic sinus tarsi syndrome without arthritis. Presence of arthritis predicts poor outcome.
Limitation: Case series without control group. Selection bias likely.

Conservative vs Surgical Treatment for Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

3
Niek van Dijk CN et al • Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective comparison of 30 patients conservative vs 35 surgical
  • Conservative treatment: 70% good results at 2 years
  • Surgical debridement: 77% good results at 2 years
  • No statistically significant difference in outcomes
  • Surgery recommended only after failed conservative treatment
  • Mean time to surgery: 11 months from injury
Clinical Implication: Conservative treatment should be first-line for at least 6 months. Surgery reserved for refractory cases with similar outcomes to conservative in successful cases.
Limitation: Retrospective, non-randomized. Potential selection bias.

Corticosteroid Injection for Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

4
Oloff LM et al • J Foot Ankle Surg (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective case series of 42 patients receiving corticosteroid injection
  • Ultrasound-guided injection technique
  • Good to excellent response in 64% at 6 months
  • Mean duration of symptom relief: 5.2 months
  • Positive response to injection predicted good surgical outcome (88% correlation)
  • No complications from injection
Clinical Implication: Corticosteroid injection is safe and effective in majority of patients. Provides temporary relief and helps confirm diagnosis.
Limitation: No placebo control. Natural history may account for some improvement.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Presentation and Diagnosis

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old recreational soccer player presents with 4 months of lateral ankle pain following an inversion injury. He describes vague pain anterior to the lateral malleolus, worse on uneven ground. He feels his ankle gives way occasionally. On examination, you find exquisite point tenderness over the sinus tarsi. Anterior drawer is negative. How do you diagnose and initially manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a classic presentation of sinus tarsi syndrome. The key features are: chronic lateral ankle pain following inversion injury, vague poorly localized pain anterior to the lateral malleolus, worse on uneven surfaces, sensation of instability, and exquisite sinus tarsi tenderness on examination. The negative anterior drawer helps differentiate from isolated lateral ankle instability, though these can coexist. I would make a clinical diagnosis of sinus tarsi syndrome. Initial investigations would include weight-bearing ankle X-rays to exclude fracture, arthritis, and assess alignment - these are usually normal in sinus tarsi syndrome. If symptoms persist beyond 3 months or there is diagnostic uncertainty, I would obtain an MRI which typically shows high T2 signal in the sinus tarsi fat pad, indicating inflammation and edema. My initial management would be conservative as 70-80% respond to non-operative treatment. This includes: activity modification avoiding uneven surfaces and impact, NSAIDs for 3-4 weeks, ice therapy, and most importantly a structured physiotherapy program focusing on proprioceptive retraining with balance exercises and single-leg stance work. I would also provide lateral ankle bracing during sports and consider lateral wedge orthotics. I would review at 6-8 weeks and expect gradual improvement over 3-6 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Classic triad: Lateral pain, sinus tarsi tenderness, instability sensation after inversion injury
Clinical diagnosis based on history and examination findings
X-rays to exclude other pathology but usually normal
MRI shows high T2 signal in sinus tarsi (if needed for confirmation)
Conservative first-line: Proprioceptive training is key component
70-80% respond to conservative treatment over 3-6 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing with lateral ankle instability - check anterior drawer
✗Ordering MRI immediately - clinical diagnosis is first step
✗Not emphasizing proprioceptive training as key to conservative treatment
✗Offering surgery too early - need 6 months conservative trial minimum
✗Missing coexisting lateral instability (30-40% of cases)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the contents of the sinus tarsi?"
"How would you perform a diagnostic injection?"
"When would you consider surgical intervention?"
"What if the anterior drawer was positive?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Refractory Case - Injection and Surgical Decision

EXAMINER

"The same patient returns after 5 months of comprehensive conservative treatment including physiotherapy with proprioceptive training, bracing, and orthotics. He remains significantly symptomatic with persistent sinus tarsi pain limiting his soccer. MRI shows high T2 signal in sinus tarsi with cervical ligament disruption but no subtalar arthritis. What are your next steps?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has failed adequate conservative treatment for 5 months and warrants consideration of more invasive options. Given the MRI confirmation of sinus tarsi pathology without arthritis, he is a good candidate for intervention. My next step would be a diagnostic and therapeutic corticosteroid injection into the sinus tarsi. This serves two purposes: first, immediate pain relief with local anesthetic confirms sinus tarsi as the pain source (high specificity over 90%), and second, the corticosteroid provides therapeutic benefit with 60-70% achieving good relief for 3-6 months. I would perform this under ultrasound guidance using a lateral approach, injecting 40 mg methylprednisolone with 1-2 mL 1% lidocaine approximately 1-2 cm deep into the sinus tarsi opening. If he gets immediate relief with the lidocaine, this confirms the diagnosis. I would then continue conservative measures including proprioceptive training during the period of relief from the steroid. If the injection provides good but temporary relief (3-6 months), I could repeat it once. However, if he fails injection therapy or has recurrent symptoms after two injections, I would discuss surgical options. Given his age, activity level, and MRI showing isolated sinus tarsi pathology without arthritis, he would be an excellent candidate for arthroscopic sinus tarsi debridement with 70-80% success rates. I would counsel that surgery requires 6 months minimum failed conservative treatment, recovery takes 3-6 months, and there is a 20-30% chance of incomplete relief.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Failed conservative treatment for 5 months warrants injection therapy
Corticosteroid injection is both diagnostic (immediate relief with LA) and therapeutic
Ultrasound-guided technique improves accuracy and outcomes
MRI showing no subtalar arthritis is good prognostic indicator
Limit to 2 corticosteroid injections maximum
Surgery only after minimum 6 months failed conservative including injection
Arthroscopic debridement is first-line surgical approach
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering surgery before injection trial - injection should come first
✗Not using the injection as diagnostic confirmation
✗Unlimited corticosteroid injections - limit to 2-3
✗Not checking MRI for subtalar arthritis before planning surgery
✗Not counseling realistic expectations - 20-30% have persistent pain post-op
✗Forgetting to continue physiotherapy after injection
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform the injection technique?"
"What if the MRI showed subtalar arthritis?"
"Describe the arthroscopic surgical technique"
"What is the expected timeline for return to soccer after surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Surgical Technique and Complications

EXAMINER

"You are planning arthroscopic sinus tarsi debridement for a patient who has failed 8 months of conservative treatment and two corticosteroid injections. Walk me through your surgical technique. What would you do if you encounter significant subtalar arthritis during the arthroscopy? What are the potential complications?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient meets criteria for surgical intervention: over 6 months failed conservative treatment, failed injection therapy, and presumably MRI confirms sinus tarsi pathology. My surgical technique would be arthroscopic sinus tarsi debridement under general anesthetic. Positioning is lateral decubitus with the affected side up, using a beanbag for stability, and thigh tourniquet. I would create two portals: an anterolateral portal just anterior to the lateral malleolus at the ankle joint level for visualization, and a sinus tarsi portal 1-2 cm anterior and inferior to the lateral malleolus directly into the sinus tarsi opening for instrumentation. Using a 2.7 mm 30-degree arthroscope, I would navigate from the anterolateral portal into the sinus tarsi. I would inspect for synovitis, adhesions, and scar tissue. The key technical point is to debride the inflamed synovium and scar tissue using a shaver while carefully preserving the cervical and interosseous talocalcaneal ligaments to maintain subtalar stability. I would perform thorough debridement of all pathologic tissue and irrigate copiously. If I encounter significant subtalar arthritis during arthroscopy, this significantly changes my management. Debridement alone in the presence of arthritis has only a 40-60% success rate compared to 70-80% without arthritis. I would discuss this finding with the patient postoperatively and counsel that if symptoms persist after debridement, they may require subtalar arthrodesis as definitive treatment. Some surgeons would convert to arthrodesis at the same surgery if severe arthritis is encountered. Potential complications include: persistent pain in 20-30% (most common, often due to unrecognized arthritis or inadequate debridement), superficial peroneal nerve injury causing numbness over the dorsum of the foot in 5-10%, wound complications in 5%, subtalar stiffness in 10-15%, and recurrence requiring revision surgery in 10-20%. Prevention strategies include thorough preoperative MRI assessment for arthritis, complete debridement of pathologic tissue while preserving ligaments, and protecting superficial nerves.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Lateral decubitus position with anterolateral and sinus tarsi portals
2.7 mm 30-degree arthroscope for visualization
Debride synovium and scar tissue, preserve cervical and ITCL ligaments
Subtalar arthritis encountered during arthroscopy equals poor prognostic indicator
May require subtalar arthrodesis if significant arthritis present
Most common complication is persistent pain (20-30%) often due to arthritis
Nerve injury (5-10%), recurrence (10-20%), stiffness (10-15%)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Excising the ligaments - must preserve cervical and ITCL for stability
✗Not assessing subtalar joint during arthroscopy
✗Proceeding with debridement despite severe arthritis - consider arthrodesis
✗Not mentioning preservation of ligaments as key technical point
✗Missing persistent pain as most common complication
✗Not recognizing subtalar arthritis as cause of surgical failure
✗Inadequate preoperative counseling about 20-30% incomplete relief rate
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is your postoperative rehabilitation protocol?"
"How would you perform a subtalar arthrodesis if needed?"
"What would you tell the patient about return to sport timeline?"
"If pain persists at 6 months post-op, what is your approach?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: What is the most important ligament within the sinus tarsi for subtalar joint stability?

A: The interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) is the primary stabilizer of the subtalar joint. It is located in the medial aspect of the sinus tarsi (tarsal canal) and has two bands. The cervical ligament is located more laterally in the sinus tarsi and is a secondary stabilizer. During surgical debridement, both ligaments must be preserved to maintain subtalar stability. Excessive excision of these ligaments can lead to iatrogenic subtalar instability.

Clinical Diagnosis Question

Q: What is the pathognomonic physical examination finding for sinus tarsi syndrome?

A: Exquisite point tenderness over the sinus tarsi (located anterior and inferior to the lateral malleolus) is the most reliable clinical sign. This is present in over 90% of cases. The sinus tarsi is palpable approximately 1-2 cm anterior to the lateral malleolus. Other findings include pain with forced inversion and eversion, and subjective instability, but sinus tarsi point tenderness is the hallmark finding that differentiates it from other causes of lateral ankle pain.

Imaging Question

Q: A patient with suspected sinus tarsi syndrome undergoes MRI. What is the characteristic finding?

A: High T2 signal intensity within the sinus tarsi (fat pad edema and inflammation) is seen in 80-90% of cases. Additional findings may include disruption or signal changes in the cervical ligament, interosseous talocalcaneal ligament abnormalities, synovitis, and subtalar joint effusion. Plain radiographs are usually normal. The most important MRI assessment is to exclude subtalar arthritis, which is a poor prognostic indicator for surgical debridement and may require arthrodesis instead.

Treatment Question

Q: What is the most important component of conservative treatment for sinus tarsi syndrome?

A: Proprioceptive training with balance exercises and single-leg stance work is the most critical component. The sinus tarsi contains dense mechanoreceptors that provide proprioceptive feedback for hindfoot position. Injury disrupts this proprioceptive function, leading to the sensation of instability. Rehabilitation must include balance board exercises, single-leg stance on unstable surfaces, and sport-specific proprioceptive drills. This is combined with activity modification, NSAIDs, ankle bracing, and orthotics. Approximately 70-80% of patients respond to conservative treatment over 3-6 months.

Surgical Question

Q: During arthroscopic sinus tarsi debridement, what is the most important technical point?

A: Preserve the cervical ligament and interosseous talocalcaneal ligament while debriding synovium and scar tissue. The goal of surgery is to remove inflamed synovium, scar tissue, and adhesions that are causing pain and impingement. However, the ligaments provide essential subtalar joint stability and must be preserved. Complete excision of these ligaments can lead to iatrogenic subtalar instability. The surgical principle is debridement of pathologic soft tissue while maintaining ligamentous integrity.

Prognosis Question

Q: Which MRI finding predicts the poorest outcome with arthroscopic sinus tarsi debridement?

A: Subtalar arthritis (joint space narrowing, cartilage loss, subchondral changes) is the strongest predictor of poor outcome. Debridement alone in the presence of subtalar arthritis has only a 40-60% success rate compared to 70-80% without arthritis. If significant arthritis is present, the patient should be counseled that subtalar arthrodesis may be necessary for definitive pain relief. Preoperative MRI assessment of the subtalar joint is essential to identify arthritis and set realistic expectations.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

PBS and Healthcare

Funded treatments:

  • Corticosteroid injection: PBS-funded

Not PBS-funded (out-of-pocket):

  • Platelet-rich plasma injection: 500-800 AUD
  • Custom orthotics: 300-600 AUD (some private health rebate)

Counsel patients about costs before recommending non-PBS treatments.

Australian Guidelines

Best Practice Recommendations:

  • Minimum 6 months conservative trial before surgery
  • Proprioceptive training essential component
  • Preoperative MRI to assess subtalar joint
  • Informed consent including 20-30% persistent pain risk

Workers' Compensation:

  • Common in occupations requiring walking on uneven ground
  • Document conservative compliance thoroughly
  • Early return to modified duties improves outcomes

Medicolegal Considerations

High-risk areas for litigation:

  1. Inadequate conservative trial: Document minimum 6 months comprehensive conservative treatment including physiotherapy with proprioceptive training, bracing, and injection therapy before recommending surgery.

  2. Missed subtalar arthritis: Preoperative MRI must assess subtalar joint. Performing debridement in presence of arthritis leads to high failure rate. Document discussion of findings and potential need for arthrodesis.

  3. Nerve injury: Superficial peroneal nerve at risk. Informed consent must include numbness risk (5-10%). Document protection of nerve during surgery.

  4. Persistent pain: 20-30% have incomplete relief. Set realistic expectations preoperatively. Document that surgery is not guaranteed cure.

  5. Wrong diagnosis: Exclude lateral ankle instability, peroneal pathology, subtalar arthritis, stress fracture before diagnosing sinus tarsi syndrome. Consider diagnostic injection to confirm.

Documentation requirements:

  • Timeline of conservative treatment and compliance
  • Injection response (diagnostic confirmation)
  • MRI findings especially subtalar joint assessment
  • Informed consent discussion including complications and incomplete relief risk
  • Surgical findings (presence of arthritis, extent of debridement)

Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Sinus tarsi: Cone-shaped tunnel between talus (superior) and calcaneus (inferior)
  • •Location: Opens laterally anterior to lateral malleolus, palpable 1-2 cm anterior to tip
  • •Contents: Interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL - main stabilizer), cervical ligament, fat pad, mechanoreceptors
  • •Function: Subtalar stability, proprioception for hindfoot position

Clinical Features

  • •Triad: Lateral hindfoot pain, sinus tarsi point tenderness, instability sensation
  • •History: 90% follow ankle inversion injury, pain worse on uneven ground
  • •Examination: Exquisite sinus tarsi tenderness (pathognomonic), pain with forced inversion/eversion
  • •Negative anterior drawer unless coexisting lateral ankle instability (30-40%)

Investigations

  • •Clinical diagnosis: Based on history and examination
  • •X-rays: Usually normal, exclude fracture and arthritis
  • •MRI: High T2 signal in sinus tarsi (80-90% sensitivity), assess subtalar joint for arthritis
  • •Diagnostic injection: 2 mL lidocaine, immediate relief confirms diagnosis (over 90% specificity)

Conservative Management

  • •First-line: 70-80% respond to conservative treatment over 3-6 months
  • •Proprioceptive training: Most important component - balance exercises, single-leg stance
  • •Activity modification: Avoid uneven surfaces, lateral ankle brace
  • •Injection: Corticosteroid if failed 3 months conservative, 60-70% temporary relief
  • •Limit 2 corticosteroid injections maximum

Surgical Technique

  • •Indication: Over 6 months failed conservative including injection therapy
  • •Arthroscopic debridement: Lateral decubitus, anterolateral and sinus tarsi portals
  • •Key technical point: Debride synovium and scar, PRESERVE cervical and ITCL ligaments
  • •Assess subtalar joint: If arthritis present, may require arthrodesis instead
  • •Success: 70-80% good to excellent results without arthritis, 40-60% if arthritis present

Complications and Outcomes

  • •Persistent pain: 20-30% most common, often due to unrecognized arthritis
  • •Nerve injury: 5-10% superficial peroneal nerve, numbness dorsum of foot
  • •Recurrence: 10-20%, incomplete debridement or untreated instability
  • •Best prognosis: Post-traumatic, no arthritis, good injection response
  • •Worst prognosis: Subtalar arthritis (consider arthrodesis), inflammatory arthropathy
Quick Stats
Reading Time127 min
Related Topics

Achilles Tendon Rupture

Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Calcaneal Fractures

Charcot Neuroarthropathy