Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Syndesmotic Instability

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Syndesmotic Instability

Comprehensive guide to syndesmotic instability - high ankle sprains, anatomy of AITFL/PITFL/IOL, West Point and Lauge-Hansen classification, clinical tests, radiographic assessment, and fixation options for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-25
High Yield Overview

SYNDESMOTIC INSTABILITY - HIGH ANKLE SPRAIN

AITFL + PITFL + IOL + ITL | External Rotation Mechanism | Subtle on Plain Films | Fix if Unstable

1-11%Of all ankle sprains
4Ligament structures (AITFL, PITFL, IOL, ITL)
6mmClear space threshold for instability
8-12Weeks return to sport vs 2-4 for lateral sprain

WEST POINT CLASSIFICATION

Latent
PatternStable with stress, no diastasis
TreatmentConservative
Subluxation
PatternUnstable with stress, reduces
TreatmentConsider fixation
Dislocation
PatternFrank diastasis, does not reduce
TreatmentOperative fixation

Critical Must-Knows

  • External rotation is the primary mechanism - AITFL tears first, then IOL, then PITFL
  • Clear space greater than 6mm on mortise view indicates instability
  • Tibiofibular overlap less than 6mm (AP) or less than 1mm (mortise) suggests diastasis
  • Clinical tests: squeeze test, external rotation stress test, Cotton test (fibular translation)
  • Surgical fixation: position ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation to avoid malreduction
  • Screw vs suture button: both effective, suture button allows physiologic motion

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    High ankle sprain = syndesmotic injury requiring 2-3x longer recovery than lateral sprain
  • "
    Always rule out syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures - Maisonneuve pattern has proximal fibula fracture
  • "
    Squeeze test compresses tibia/fibula at mid-calf - reproduces pain at syndesmosis
  • "
    External rotation stress view shows diastasis - compare to contralateral side

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

2-panel AP and lateral ankle X-ray showing syndesmotic diastasis
Click to expand
2-panel AP and lateral ankle X-ray showing syndesmotic diastasisCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY 4.0)
4-panel radiographic series showing syndesmotic fixation with suture button
Click to expand
4-panel radiographic series showing syndesmotic fixation with suture buttonCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY 4.0)
TightRope suture button device components photograph
Click to expand
TightRope suture button device components photographCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY 4.0)

Critical Syndesmotic Instability Exam Points

Mechanism: External Rotation

External rotation of the foot on a planted ankle is the key mechanism. This sequentially disrupts AITFL (first), interosseous ligament (second), and PITFL (last). Internal rotation injuries are rare and produce different patterns.

Radiographic Clear Space

Clear space greater than 6mm on mortise view is the most reliable plain film sign of diastasis. Also check tibiofibular overlap: less than 6mm on AP or less than 1mm on mortise is abnormal. Need stress views if equivocal.

Squeeze Test Gold Standard

Squeeze test (compressing tibia and fibula at mid-calf) has the highest sensitivity for syndesmotic injury. Pain at the ankle (not at the squeeze site) indicates syndesmotic disruption. External rotation stress test is also highly specific.

Dorsiflexion During Fixation

Position the ankle in dorsiflexion during syndesmotic fixation. The talus is wider anteriorly - dorsiflexion locks the talus in the mortise and prevents over-compression. Check reduction on intraoperative fluoroscopy before fixation.

Quick Decision Guide - Syndesmotic Injury Management

Injury PatternStabilityTreatmentKey Points
Isolated sprain, no diastasisStable on stress viewsConservative: boot 2-4 weeks, progressive weight bearingReturn to sport 6-8 weeks (longer than lateral sprain)
Subluxation on stressLatent instabilityConsider fixation if athletic demands high, otherwise trial conservativeMRI can confirm extent of ligament injury
Frank diastasis on static filmsUnstable (West Point dislocation)Operative fixation mandatory1-2 screws or suture button construct
Ankle fracture with syndesmotic injuryUnstable if disruptedFix fracture, then assess syndesmosis with Cotton test intraoperativelyFix if more than 2mm fibular translation or diastasis on stress
Mnemonic

PITFALL - Syndesmotic Ligament Anatomy

P
PITFL (Posterior inferior TibiوFibular Ligament)
Strongest component, last to tear
I
Interosseous ligament (IOL)
Distal extension of interosseous membrane
T
Transverse tibiofibular ligament
Deep part of PITFL, labrum-like function
F
AITFL (Anterior inferior TibiوFibular Ligament)
First to tear, most clinically important
A
Anatomic reduction essential
Even 1mm malreduction causes arthritis
L
Lateral malleolus position
Must restore length, rotation, and apposition
L
Long recovery time
8-12 weeks vs 2-4 for lateral sprain

Memory Hook:PITFALL reminds you of the ligaments (PITFL, IOL, AITFL) and the pitfalls of missing or undertreating syndesmotic injury

Mnemonic

EXTERNAL - Mechanism and Clinical Assessment

E
External rotation
Primary mechanism of injury
X
X-ray: clear space and overlap
Clear space greater than 6mm, overlap less than 6mm (AP) or less than 1mm (mortise)
T
Tests: squeeze, external rotation, Cotton
Clinical examination maneuvers
E
Examine proximal fibula
Maisonneuve fracture pattern
R
Reduction checked on fluoro
Intraoperative assessment before fixation
N
Neutral rotation during fixation
Ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation
A
Anterior tibiofibular ligament first
Sequential failure pattern
L
Longer recovery than lateral
High ankle sprain takes 8-12 weeks

Memory Hook:EXTERNAL reminds you of the external rotation mechanism and the key assessment and treatment principles

Mnemonic

SCREW vs BUTTON Decision

S
Screw: rigid fixation
3.5mm or 4.5mm cortical screw, 3-4 cortices
C
Cotton test intraop
Assess fibular translation to confirm instability
R
Remove screw at 8-12 weeks (if not bioabsorbable)
Prevents screw breakage
E
Early motion with button
Suture button allows physiologic motion
W
Weight bearing delayed with screw
Protected until screw removal or union

Memory Hook:SCREW highlights the traditional screw fixation approach and the need for removal

Mnemonic

6-1-2 Rule for Radiographic Assessment

6
6mm clear space
Greater than 6mm on mortise = diastasis
1
1mm mortise overlap
Less than 1mm tibiofibular overlap on mortise = abnormal
2
2mm fibular translation
Greater than 2mm on Cotton test = unstable

Memory Hook:Remember the critical measurements: 6-1-2 for clear space, overlap, and translation

Overview and Epidemiology

Syndesmotic instability, commonly called a high ankle sprain, refers to disruption of the ligamentous structures that bind the distal tibia and fibula together, allowing abnormal motion and widening (diastasis) of the ankle mortise.

Incidence and context:

  • Accounts for 1-11% of all ankle sprains in the general population
  • Much higher incidence in contact sports (American football, rugby, ice hockey)
  • Present in 23% of operatively treated ankle fractures
  • Associated with Maisonneuve fractures (proximal fibula fracture with syndesmotic disruption)

Clinical significance:

  • Prolonged recovery: 8-12 weeks to return to sport vs 2-4 weeks for lateral ankle sprain
  • High missed diagnosis rate: up to 20% initially missed on clinical examination
  • Post-traumatic arthritis: even 1mm of malreduction increases contact pressures by 40%
  • Chronic pain and instability if undertreated

Why 'High' Ankle Sprain?

The term "high ankle sprain" distinguishes syndesmotic injuries from the much more common lateral ankle sprain (ATFL/CFL). The syndesmotic ligaments are located above the ankle joint proper, between the tibia and fibula, rather than connecting the talus to the fibula (as in lateral sprains).

Mechanism of injury:

  • External rotation of the foot relative to the leg (most common)
  • Foot planted, body rotates over it
  • Common in cutting sports, tackles, or getting foot caught in a hole
  • Less commonly: hyperdorsiflexion or eversion

The syndesmotic ligament complex:

  1. AITFL (Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament) - tears first
  2. IOL (Interosseous Ligament) - distal extension of interosseous membrane
  3. PITFL (Posterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament) - strongest, tears last
  4. ITL (Inferior Transverse Ligament) - deep portion of PITFL

Pathophysiology

Injury mechanism and sequential failure:

Syndesmotic injuries occur through a predictable biomechanical sequence when external rotation force is applied to the foot while the leg is fixed:

Stage 1: AITFL disruption

  • External rotation force first tensions the AITFL
  • AITFL is relatively weaker than PITFL
  • Partial or complete tear occurs depending on force magnitude
  • Allows initial widening of anterior syndesmosis

Stage 2: Interosseous ligament failure

  • Continued external rotation propagates injury proximally
  • Interosseous ligament tears from distal to proximal
  • May extend several centimeters up the interosseous membrane
  • Creates potential space for fibular displacement

Stage 3: PITFL disruption

  • PITFL is the strongest component (42% of stability)
  • Last to fail in complete syndesmotic disruption
  • May avulse with posterior malleolus fracture (Volkmann fragment)
  • Complete disruption allows frank diastasis

Biomechanical consequences of instability:

Mortise widening:

  • Normal tibiofibular clear space: 2-5mm
  • Even 1mm lateral displacement of fibula reduces tibiotalar contact area by 42%
  • Contact pressure increases by 40% with 1mm malreduction
  • Creates asymmetric loading pattern on tibial plafond

Altered ankle kinematics:

  • Loss of normal syndesmotic motion during dorsiflexion
  • Fibula cannot translate laterally as talus widens anteriorly
  • Abnormal talar position in mortise during gait cycle
  • Increased shear stress on articular cartilage

Progressive cartilage degeneration:

  • Chronic overload of medial or lateral tibial plafond
  • Subchondral bone stress and microfracture
  • Cartilage breakdown over months to years
  • Post-traumatic osteoarthritis develops

The 1mm Rule - Biomechanical Basis

Cadaver studies show that 1mm of lateral fibular displacement reduces tibiotalar contact area by 42% and increases peak contact pressure by 40%. This explains why anatomic reduction is essential - even small degrees of malreduction lead to accelerated arthritis.

Factors affecting healing:

  • Ligament vascularity: syndesmotic ligaments have lower blood supply than lateral ankle ligaments
  • Constant stress: weight bearing continuously stresses the healing syndesmosis
  • Fibrous vs anatomic healing: without fixation, ligaments may heal in elongated position
  • Scar tissue formation: interposition prevents anatomic healing

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Syndesmosis

Syndesmotic ligament complex:

The distal tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) is a fibrous joint stabilized by four primary ligament structures:

1. Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (AITFL):

  • Origin: anterior tubercle of tibia (Chaput tubercle)
  • Insertion: anterior aspect of fibula
  • Most commonly injured (tears first in external rotation)
  • Oriented obliquely downward from tibia to fibula
  • Provides 35% of syndesmotic stability

2. Interosseous Ligament (IOL):

  • Distal continuation of the interosseous membrane
  • Provides 22% of syndesmotic stability
  • Disrupts after AITFL in sequential injury pattern

3. Posterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (PITFL):

  • Origin: posterior tubercle of tibia (Volkmann tubercle)
  • Insertion: posterior aspect of fibula
  • Strongest component (42% of stability)
  • Tears last in external rotation injuries
  • Superficial and deep components

4. Inferior Transverse Ligament (ITL):

  • Deep portion of PITFL
  • Creates a labrum-like extension posteriorly
  • Contacts the posterior talus

Sequential Failure Pattern

In external rotation injuries, the ligaments fail in a predictable sequence: AITFL first, then IOL, then PITFL. Complete syndesmotic disruption requires failure of all three. The PITFL is the strongest and is the key stabilizer - if intact, the syndesmosis is usually stable.

Biomechanics of the ankle mortise:

  • Talar dome is wider anteriorly by 2-3mm
  • During dorsiflexion, the wider anterior talus pushes the fibula laterally, causing physiologic widening (up to 1-2mm)
  • The syndesmotic ligaments allow this normal physiologic motion while preventing excessive separation
  • Contact area: syndesmotic ligaments contribute to tibiotalar contact mechanics

Functional anatomy:

1mm Malreduction Rule

Even 1mm of lateral fibular displacement increases tibiotalar contact pressures by 40% and significantly increases risk of post-traumatic arthritis. Anatomic reduction is essential - "close enough" is not acceptable for syndesmotic injuries.

  • Fibular length: shortening of more than 2mm causes altered ankle biomechanics
  • Fibular rotation: external rotation malreduction narrows the mortise posteriorly
  • Syndesmotic width: must restore anatomic tibiofibular relationship

Classification Systems

West Point Ankle Grading System

This is the most commonly used classification for syndesmotic instability:

GradeDescriptionStabilityTreatment
LatentLigament disruption but no diastasis on static or stress filmsStableConservative
SubluxationDiastasis only with stress testing, reduces spontaneouslyUnstableConsider fixation (depends on activity level)
DislocationFrank diastasis on static radiographsUnstableOperative fixation mandatory

Clinical Application

The West Point classification guides treatment. Latent injuries can be treated conservatively with protected weight bearing. Subluxation injuries may be managed conservatively in low-demand patients but often require fixation in athletes. Dislocation injuries always require operative fixation.

This classification is based on the clinical finding and assists in treatment decisions.

Lauge-Hansen Classification (Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Injury)

Syndesmotic injuries occur in specific fracture patterns:

Supination-External Rotation (SER):

  • Stage I: AITFL disruption
  • Stage II: Spiral oblique fibula fracture (at joint level)
  • Stage III: PITFL disruption or posterior malleolus fracture
  • Stage IV: Transverse medial malleolus fracture or deltoid rupture

Pronation-External Rotation (PER):

  • Stage I: Transverse medial malleolus fracture or deltoid rupture
  • Stage II: AITFL disruption
  • Stage III: Spiral oblique fibula fracture (above joint level)
  • Stage IV: PITFL disruption or posterior malleolus fracture

Pronation-Abduction (PAB):

  • May have syndesmotic disruption in later stages
  • Typically transverse fibula fracture at joint level

Maisonneuve Fracture

Maisonneuve fracture is a PER Stage III/IV injury: proximal fibula fracture + complete syndesmotic disruption + medial injury (deltoid or medial malleolus). The entire syndesmosis is disrupted and requires fixation even though the distal fibula appears intact.

Understanding the Lauge-Hansen mechanism helps predict associated injuries.

Edwards and DeLee Classification (Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries)

This classification focuses on isolated syndesmotic injuries without fracture:

TypeDescriptionAssociated Findings
Type IIsolated syndesmotic sprainNo fracture, stable on stress
Type IISyndesmotic disruption with medial injuryDeltoid ligament or medial malleolus involved
Type IIISyndesmotic disruption with lateral injuryFibula fracture (distal)

Implications:

  • Type I: Usually conservative management
  • Type II and III: Higher likelihood of requiring surgical stabilization

This classification emphasizes the importance of identifying associated medial or lateral injuries.

Clinical Presentation and Examination

History:

  • Mechanism: external rotation injury, twisting on planted foot, direct blow
  • Pain location: anterior ankle, just above the joint line (compared to lateral ankle sprain which is more distal)
  • Inability to bear weight immediately after injury
  • Prolonged symptoms: pain lasting weeks (vs days for typical lateral sprain)

Red flags suggesting syndesmotic injury:

  • High-energy mechanism
  • Persistent pain despite treatment for "ankle sprain"
  • Proximal fibular tenderness (Maisonneuve)
  • Pain with ambulation more than 2 weeks post-injury

Physical examination:

Squeeze Test:

  • Compress tibia and fibula together at mid-calf level
  • Positive: pain at the ankle (distal syndesmosis), not at the compression site
  • Sensitivity: 30-92%, Specificity: 88-95%
  • Most sensitive clinical test for syndesmotic injury

External Rotation Stress Test:

  • Stabilize leg, externally rotate foot with knee flexed to 90 degrees
  • Positive: pain at anterior or posterior syndesmosis
  • Sensitivity: 20-71%, Specificity: 85-97%
  • Most specific clinical test

Cotton Test (Fibular Translation Test):

  • Grasp calcaneus and talus, translate laterally
  • Positive: greater than 2mm lateral shift of fibula relative to tibia
  • More commonly performed intraoperatively under anesthesia
  • Compares to contralateral side

Dorsiflexion-External Rotation Test:

  • Dorsiflex ankle and apply external rotation force
  • Positive: pain at syndesmosis
  • May be difficult to perform acutely due to pain

Test Interpretation

No single clinical test is perfectly sensitive. If the mechanism and presentation suggest syndesmotic injury, proceed with imaging even if tests are negative. Combine clinical tests to improve diagnostic accuracy.

This section covers the examination findings used to assess syndesmotic stability.

Palpation sequence:

  1. Anterior syndesmosis: palpate just above the ankle joint, between tibia and fibula

    • Tenderness here suggests AITFL injury
  2. Posterior syndesmosis: palpate posterolateral ankle

    • Tenderness suggests PITFL injury
  3. Proximal fibula: always palpate the fibular head and neck

    • Tenderness indicates possible Maisonneuve fracture
  4. Medial structures: palpate medial malleolus and deltoid ligament

    • Often injured in combination with syndesmotic disruption
  5. Interosseous membrane: palpate along the length of the leg

    • Proximal tenderness may indicate high interosseous membrane injury

Comparison to contralateral side is essential to detect subtle abnormalities.

This systematic approach ensures you do not miss associated injuries.

Gait assessment:

  • Inability to weight bear suggests significant injury
  • Antalgic gait with external rotation of foot to avoid pain
  • Push-off weakness (due to pain with dorsiflexion)

Range of motion:

  • Pain at end-range dorsiflexion (talus widens mortise)
  • Pain with plantarflexion and external rotation
  • Compare to uninjured side

Strength testing:

  • Gastrocnemius strength: heel raise test (often painful)
  • Tibialis anterior: resisted dorsiflexion
  • Eversion and inversion strength

Single leg hop test (subacute phase):

  • Inability to hop suggests persistent instability
  • Useful for return-to-sport decisions

Functional assessment helps gauge severity and recovery progress.

Investigations and Imaging

Clinical Imaging Gallery

Syndesmotic diastasis on plain radiographs
Click to expand
Two-panel ankle radiographs demonstrating syndesmotic diastasis. Left panel (AP view): Note the widened tibiofibular clear space indicating disruption of the syndesmotic ligaments. The Chinese character (左) indicates this is the left ankle. Right panel (lateral view): Shows the distal tibia-fibula relationship from the lateral perspective. On AP view, tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm at 1cm above the plafond indicates instability. Always compare to the contralateral ankle when in doubt.Credit: PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0
Syndesmotic fixation with suture button construct
Click to expand
Four-panel radiographic series demonstrating syndesmotic fixation with suture button (TightRope) construct. Panel a: Pre-operative AP view showing syndesmotic widening. Panel b: Post-operative AP view showing suture button in place with anatomic reduction of the tibiofibular relationship. Panel c: Post-operative lateral view confirming hardware position. Panel d: Follow-up AP view demonstrating maintained reduction and healed syndesmosis. Suture button allows physiologic micromotion at the syndesmosis and avoids the need for implant removal, unlike traditional syndesmotic screws.Credit: PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0
TightRope suture button device components
Click to expand
Photograph showing the components of a TightRope (Arthrex) suture button device used for flexible syndesmotic fixation. Components include the metal buttons (endobuttons), FiberWire suture, and associated tensioning hardware. This flexible fixation construct has become popular as an alternative to rigid screw fixation, allowing 1-2mm of physiologic motion at the syndesmosis while maintaining stability. Evidence shows equivalent outcomes to screw fixation with the advantage of avoiding routine hardware removal.Credit: PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0

Standard ankle series (AP, mortise, lateral):

AP view measurements:

  • Tibiofibular overlap: should be greater than 6mm
    • Less than 6mm suggests diastasis
  • Tibiofibular clear space: measure 1cm above plafond
    • Greater than 6mm suggests instability

Mortise view measurements (most important):

  • Medial clear space: distance between medial malleolus and talus
    • Should be equal to superior clear space (ankle joint space)
    • Widening greater than 1mm compared to superior = deltoid injury
  • Tibiofibular clear space: greater than 6mm abnormal
  • Tibiofibular overlap: less than 1mm abnormal
  • Talocrural angle: should be symmetric

Lateral view:

  • Assess for posterior malleolus fracture (associated with PITFL injury)
  • Greater than 25% articular surface involvement may need fixation

The 6mm Rule

On the mortise view, a tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm is the most reliable plain radiograph sign of syndesmotic diastasis. Also check tibiofibular overlap: less than 6mm on AP or less than 1mm on mortise is abnormal.

Weight-bearing radiographs:

  • May reveal diastasis not apparent on non-weight-bearing films
  • Useful in chronic or subtle cases

Plain radiographs are the initial imaging modality and often diagnostic.

External rotation stress view:

  • Apply external rotation force to foot while taking mortise radiograph
  • Can be performed manually or with device
  • Positive: widening of medial clear space or tibiofibular clear space
  • Compare to contralateral side (bilateral views essential)

Gravity stress view:

  • Patient positioned lateral decubitus
  • Foot hangs off table, gravity provides stress
  • Less painful than manual stress

Cotton test (radiographic):

  • Apply lateral translation force to foot
  • Measure fibular displacement
  • Greater than 2mm compared to contralateral side indicates instability

Indications for stress views:

  • Equivocal findings on static radiographs
  • High clinical suspicion despite normal static films
  • Assessment of isolated syndesmotic injury (West Point latent vs subluxation)

Contralateral Comparison

Always obtain bilateral stress views for comparison. Normal syndesmotic width varies between individuals. A 1mm side-to-side difference is significant.

Stress radiographs are the gold standard for diagnosing latent syndesmotic instability.

MRI:

  • Indications:
    • Confirm extent of ligamentous injury
    • Assess for associated injuries (osteochondral lesions, deltoid, lateral ligaments)
    • Chronic syndesmotic pain with normal radiographs
  • Findings:
    • AITFL disruption: fluid signal, discontinuity
    • PITFL disruption: similar findings
    • Bone bruising in distal tibia/fibula
    • Associated deltoid or lateral ligament injuries

CT scan:

  • Indications:
    • Assess posterior malleolus fracture size
    • Evaluate syndesmotic reduction after fixation
    • Assess for malreduction (fibular malposition)
  • Axial CT at level of tibial plafond:
    • Measure fibular position in incisura
    • Assess for rotational malreduction

Ultrasound:

  • Dynamic assessment of syndesmotic stability
  • Less commonly used
  • Operator-dependent

Arthroscopy:

  • Can directly visualize syndesmotic widening
  • Greater than 2mm widening on arthroscopic visualization = instability
  • Useful intraoperatively to assess reduction

Advanced imaging is helpful for equivocal cases or surgical planning.

Imaging Modality Comparison

ModalityAdvantagesLimitationsBest Use
Plain radiographs (mortise)Fast, low cost, readily available. Clear space and overlap measurementsMay miss latent instabilityInitial screening, frank diastasis
Stress radiographsGold standard for latent instability. Bilateral comparisonRequires contralateral views, can be painfulEquivocal cases, isolated syndesmotic injury
MRIVisualizes ligaments, assesses associated injuriesExpensive, longer acquisition timeChronic pain, pre-operative planning
CT scanExcellent for bony detail, post-operative reduction assessmentRadiation, poor soft tissue detailPosterior malleolus, assess reduction quality

Management Algorithm

Indications for conservative management:

  • West Point latent (stable on stress testing)
  • Isolated AITFL sprain without diastasis
  • No associated fractures
  • Patient can bear weight without significant pain

Acute phase (0-2 weeks):

  • RICE protocol: rest, ice, compression, elevation
  • Controlled Ankle Motion (CAM) boot or below-knee cast
  • Non-weight bearing initially, progress as tolerated
  • NSAIDs for pain (short course to avoid delayed healing)
  • Crutches until comfortable single-leg standing

Intermediate phase (2-6 weeks):

  • Progress to protected weight bearing in boot
  • Begin gentle range of motion exercises
    • Alphabet exercises
    • Plantarflexion and dorsiflexion
    • Avoid inversion/eversion initially
  • Progressive resistance exercises
  • Continue boot for 4-6 weeks total

Late phase (6-12 weeks):

  • Wean from boot to lace-up ankle brace
  • Proprioceptive training: balance exercises, single leg stance
  • Strengthening: gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, peroneals
  • Sport-specific drills (if athlete)
  • Gradual return to activity

Return to sport criteria:

  • No pain with weight bearing or running
  • Full range of motion compared to contralateral
  • Single leg hop test 90% of contralateral
  • Typically 8-12 weeks (2-3x longer than lateral ankle sprain)

Why Longer Recovery?

High ankle sprains take significantly longer to heal than lateral ankle sprains because: (1) the syndesmotic ligaments are under constant stress with weight bearing; (2) the mortise must remain stable during dynamic activities; (3) incomplete healing leads to chronic instability and pain.

Follow-up radiographs at 2-4 weeks to ensure no delayed diastasis develops.

Absolute indications for surgery:

  • Frank diastasis on static radiographs (West Point dislocation)
  • Unstable ankle fracture with syndesmotic injury
  • Maisonneuve fracture with syndesmotic disruption
  • Greater than 2mm fibular translation on Cotton test

Relative indications:

  • West Point subluxation in high-demand athletes
  • Persistent instability despite 6 weeks conservative treatment
  • Chronic syndesmotic instability with pain

Intraoperative assessment (for ankle fractures):

  • After fibula fixation, perform Cotton test under fluoroscopy
  • Assess for greater than 2mm lateral translation of fibula
  • Compare to contralateral side if uncertain
  • Assess medial clear space on mortise view
  • If unstable, proceed with syndesmotic fixation

Goals of surgery:

  1. Anatomic reduction of tibiofibular relationship
  2. Maintain reduction while ligaments heal
  3. Allow early range of motion (if using suture button)
  4. Prevent post-traumatic arthritis

Anatomic Reduction Critical

The most important factor in syndesmotic surgery is anatomic reduction. Even 1mm malreduction significantly increases arthritis risk. Check reduction on AP, mortise, and lateral fluoroscopy before inserting fixation.

Surgical decision-making is based on stability assessment and fracture pattern.

Surgical Technique

Traditional syndesmotic screw fixation:

Setup:

  • Patient supine, bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Thigh tourniquet (optional)
  • Fluoroscopy available (AP, mortise, lateral views)

Step 1: Reduction of syndesmosis

  • Ensure fibular length restored (if fracture present)
  • Position ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation
    • Dorsiflexion widens anterior talus, preventing over-compression
  • Apply reduction clamp from fibula to tibia
    • Place clamp 2cm above joint line
    • Apply gentle compression (avoid over-compression)
  • Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy:
    • AP: tibiofibular overlap greater than 6mm
    • Mortise: clear space less than 6mm, overlap greater than 1mm
    • Lateral: fibula centered in incisura

Step 2: Screw insertion

  • Insert screw 2-3cm above tibial plafond
  • Direction: 30 degrees anterior to posterior (parallel to joint line)
  • Size: 3.5mm or 4.5mm cortical screw
  • Drill perpendicular to long axis of fibula
  • Purchase: 3 cortices (both fibular cortices + near tibial cortex) or 4 cortices (all four)
    • 3 cortices: allows some motion, screw less likely to break
    • 4 cortices: more rigid, higher breakage rate
  • Do not lag the screw (use non-lag technique)

Step 3: Optional second screw

  • Some surgeons place 2 screws for increased stability
  • Second screw 1-2cm proximal to first
  • Same trajectory and technique

Step 4: Confirm reduction

  • Remove clamp
  • Obtain final fluoroscopy images (AP, mortise, lateral)
  • Ensure clear space, overlap, and fibular position anatomic

Screw removal:

  • Remove at 8-12 weeks if non-bioabsorbable
  • Prevents screw breakage with weight bearing
  • Protected weight bearing until screw removed or bioabsorbable screw incorporated

Tricortical vs Quadricortical

Tricortical fixation (3 cortices) is increasingly favored because it provides adequate stability while allowing some physiologic motion and has a lower screw breakage rate. Quadricortical fixation is more rigid but requires screw removal before full weight bearing.

This is the traditional technique with proven long-term results.

Suture button (TightRope) fixation:

Advantages:

  • Allows physiologic motion of syndesmosis (1-2mm)
  • No need for implant removal
  • Early weight bearing and range of motion
  • Lower re-operation rate

Disadvantages:

  • Higher cost
  • Technically more demanding
  • Potential for over-compression if not careful

Setup:

  • Same positioning as screw fixation
  • Ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation

Step 1: Reduction

  • Reduce syndesmosis as with screw technique
  • Confirm on fluoroscopy

Step 2: Device insertion

  • Drill 4mm hole from fibula to tibia
    • Entry point 2-3cm above plafond on fibula
    • Trajectory 30 degrees anterior to posterior
  • Pass suture button device through drill hole
  • Fibular button sits on lateral fibula
  • Tibial button flips on medial tibial cortex

Step 3: Tensioning

  • Apply tension to suture (usually pre-loaded with specific tension)
  • Buttons compress fibula to tibia
  • Avoid over-compression: should restore normal anatomy, not compress excessively
  • Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy

Step 4: Final checks

  • Remove clamp if used
  • Assess stability by manually stressing ankle
  • Confirm measurements on final images

Post-operative protocol:

  • Early weight bearing as tolerated (advantage over screw)
  • Early range of motion (within days)
  • No implant removal needed

Suture Button Evidence

Multiple RCTs show equivalent outcomes between screw and suture button fixation. Suture button has lower re-operation rate (no removal needed) and allows earlier rehabilitation. Some studies suggest faster return to sport with suture button.

Suture button is increasingly popular, especially in athletic populations.

Common pitfalls in syndesmotic fixation:

1. Malreduction (most critical):

  • Over-compression: clamp applied too aggressively
    • Narrows mortise excessively
    • Prevention: gentle clamp application, check on all views
  • External rotation malreduction: fibula externally rotated
    • Narrowing of posterior mortise
    • Prevention: neutral rotation during fixation, check lateral view
  • Anterior/posterior malposition:
    • Fibula translated anteriorly or posteriorly in incisura
    • Prevention: lateral fluoroscopy view, compare to contralateral CT if needed

2. Screw placement errors:

  • Too distal: less than 2cm above plafond
    • Risk of intra-articular placement
  • Wrong trajectory: not parallel to joint
    • Causes eccentric fibular position
  • Lagging the screw:
    • Causes over-compression and malreduction

3. Inadequate assessment:

  • Failure to assess stability after fibula fixation
    • Cotton test essential in fracture cases
  • Not comparing to contralateral side
    • Normal anatomy varies; comparison is key

4. Post-operative management errors:

  • Early weight bearing with rigid screw fixation
    • Leads to screw breakage
  • Failure to remove screw
    • Screw breakage, difficulty with removal later

Recognition and management:

  • Intraoperative: check fluoroscopy on all views before final fixation
  • Post-operative: CT scan if malreduction suspected
  • Revision if more than 1mm malreduction on post-op imaging

Malreduction Revision

If post-operative imaging shows malreduction (greater than 1mm), strongly consider revision within 2 weeks. Delayed revision is more difficult and outcomes worse. Early re-operation to restore anatomy prevents arthritis.

Awareness of pitfalls and meticulous technique prevent complications.

Complications

Intraoperative complications:

1. Malreduction (20-50% incidence):

  • Over-compression of syndesmosis
  • Fibular malposition (rotation, translation)
  • Recognition: intraoperative fluoroscopy on multiple views
  • Prevention: ankle in dorsiflexion, neutral rotation, gentle clamp application

2. Intra-articular screw placement:

  • Screw placed too distal or wrong trajectory
  • Recognition: pain, limited motion, radiographic signs
  • Prevention: stay 2cm above plafond, confirm on lateral view

3. Neurovascular injury:

  • Superficial peroneal nerve (at fibular incision site)
  • Deep peroneal nerve or anterior tibial vessels (rare, with anterior approach)
  • Prevention: careful dissection, knowledge of anatomy

Early post-operative complications:

4. Wound complications:

  • Incidence: 5-10% in ankle fracture surgery
  • Risk factors: diabetes, smoking, soft tissue injury
  • Prevention: delay surgery if blisters present, careful soft tissue handling

5. Screw breakage (early):

  • If weight bearing too early with rigid fixation
  • Usually asymptomatic if syndesmosis healed
  • Prevention: protected weight bearing until screw removal or union

6. Loss of reduction:

  • Syndesmosis re-widens despite fixation
  • May indicate inadequate fixation or continued instability
  • Management: revision fixation if detected early

These complications can often be prevented with careful technique and appropriate post-operative protocols.

Chronic complications:

1. Post-traumatic arthritis (long-term most significant):

  • Incidence: 10-30% at 5-10 years
  • Malreduction is the primary risk factor
  • Even 1mm malreduction significantly increases risk
  • Presentation: pain, stiffness, crepitus
  • Management: conservative initially (activity modification, bracing, NSAIDs), ankle fusion or replacement for end-stage

2. Chronic syndesmotic instability:

  • Persistent or recurrent diastasis
  • Causes: inadequate initial fixation, premature screw removal, high-energy injury
  • Presentation: chronic pain, feeling of "giving way", difficulty with push-off
  • Diagnosis: weight-bearing radiographs, stress views, MRI
  • Management: syndesmotic reconstruction (see Chronic Instability tab)

3. Heterotopic ossification:

  • Bone formation in syndesmotic region
  • Incidence: 20-30% after syndesmotic injury
  • Usually asymptomatic, found incidentally on radiographs
  • Rarely requires excision

4. Screw-related issues:

  • Screw breakage: 25-50% if not removed by 12 weeks
    • Usually asymptomatic if syndesmosis healed
    • Remove if symptomatic
  • Difficulty removing screw: osseointegration, stripped head
  • Prevention: remove at 8-12 weeks, use bioabsorbable screws

5. Stiffness and limited dorsiflexion:

  • More common with rigid fixation and prolonged immobilization
  • Prevention: early motion (especially with suture button), aggressive PT
  • Treatment: stretching, manipulation under anesthesia if severe

6. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS):

  • Rare but can be devastating
  • Presentation: disproportionate pain, allodynia, autonomic changes
  • Management: early recognition, desensitization, pain management referral

Long-term outcomes depend primarily on achieving and maintaining anatomic reduction.

Chronic syndesmotic instability:

Definition:

  • Persistent diastasis or recurrent instability more than 6 months after injury

Causes:

  • Inadequate initial treatment (missed diagnosis)
  • Premature implant removal
  • Malreduction with initial surgery
  • High-energy injury with extensive soft tissue damage

Presentation:

  • Chronic anterolateral ankle pain
  • Pain with push-off or cutting activities
  • Feeling of ankle "giving way"
  • Difficulty returning to sport

Diagnosis:

  • Weight-bearing radiographs: diastasis on static films
  • Stress radiographs: compare to contralateral side
  • MRI: assess ligamentous healing, rule out other pathology
  • CT scan: assess arthritis, fibular position

Non-operative management (trial first):

  • Activity modification
  • Lace-up ankle brace or custom orthosis
  • Physical therapy: proprioception, strengthening
  • NSAIDs for pain
  • Consider PRP or other biologics (limited evidence)

Operative management:

1. Syndesmotic screw or suture button (if ligaments have potential to heal):

  • Reduce syndesmosis under fluoroscopy
  • Fix with screw or button as acute injury
  • Outcomes variable, better if less than 6 months from injury

2. Direct ligament repair/reconstruction:

  • Open repair of AITFL and PITFL with suture anchors
  • Augmentation with suture tape or internal brace
  • Autograft reconstruction: free tendon graft (gracilis, semitendinosus) through drill holes
  • Allograft reconstruction: similar technique with allograft

3. Arthroscopic debridement + fixation:

  • Remove scar tissue and synovitis
  • Assess reduction arthroscopically
  • Fix with screw or button

Outcomes:

  • Chronic instability surgery has less predictable results than acute fixation
  • Earlier intervention (less than 6 months) has better outcomes
  • Presence of arthritis worsens prognosis

Prevention is Key

The best treatment for chronic syndesmotic instability is prevention: accurate diagnosis acutely, anatomic reduction, appropriate fixation, and adequate healing time before return to activity. Missing the diagnosis or undertreating the injury leads to chronic problems that are difficult to treat.

Chronic syndesmotic instability is a challenging problem that is best prevented.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-operative protocol for screw fixation:

Phase 1: Protection (0-2 weeks)

  • Splint or boot with non-weight bearing
  • Elevate leg above heart level
  • Ice for swelling control
  • DVT prophylaxis if indicated
  • Suture removal at 10-14 days

Phase 2: Early mobilization (2-6 weeks)

  • Transition to CAM boot
  • Non-weight bearing continues (if quadricortical screw)
  • Partial weight bearing (if tricortical screw, some protocols)
  • Begin gentle ROM exercises (plantarflexion/dorsiflexion)
  • Avoid inversion/eversion

Phase 3: Screw removal and progressive loading (6-12 weeks)

  • Screw removal at 8-12 weeks (if not bioabsorbable)
  • After removal, progress to full weight bearing over 2 weeks
  • Wean from boot to ankle brace
  • ROM exercises progress to include inversion/eversion
  • Begin strengthening exercises

Phase 4: Return to activity (12+ weeks)

  • Progress strengthening
  • Proprioceptive training: balance board, single leg exercises
  • Sport-specific drills
  • Gradual return to sport at 12-16 weeks post-screw removal

Total timeline: 20-28 weeks (5-7 months) from surgery to full sport

Why Remove Screw?

Screws are removed to prevent breakage and allow resumption of full activity. Screw breakage rate is 25-50% if left in place beyond 12 weeks with weight bearing. Broken screws are usually asymptomatic but can be difficult to remove later if needed.

This protocol protects the syndesmosis during ligament healing.

Post-operative protocol for suture button fixation:

Phase 1: Protection (0-2 weeks)

  • Splint or boot
  • Weight bearing as tolerated (major advantage over screw)
  • Ice and elevation
  • DVT prophylaxis if indicated
  • Suture removal at 10-14 days

Phase 2: Early mobilization (2-6 weeks)

  • Continue boot
  • Full weight bearing progressed rapidly
  • Early ROM exercises (within days of surgery)
    • Ankle pumps immediately
    • ROM in all planes by 2 weeks
  • Begin resistance band exercises

Phase 3: Strengthening (6-12 weeks)

  • Wean from boot to ankle brace (by 6 weeks)
  • Progressive strengthening program
    • Gastrocnemius: heel raises (bilateral, then unilateral)
    • Tibialis anterior: resisted dorsiflexion
    • Peroneals and invertors: resistance band
  • Proprioceptive training: balance exercises

Phase 4: Return to activity (12+ weeks)

  • Sport-specific training
  • Agility drills
  • Gradual return to sport at 12-16 weeks

Total timeline: 12-16 weeks (3-4 months) from surgery to full sport

Advantages:

  • Faster return to activity (no screw removal wait)
  • Early motion reduces stiffness
  • No re-operation for implant removal

Suture Button Advantage

The primary advantage of suture button is faster rehabilitation due to allowance of physiologic motion and earlier weight bearing. This translates to earlier return to sport by approximately 2-3 months compared to screw fixation.

This accelerated protocol is a major benefit for athletes.

Detailed rehabilitation exercise progression:

Early phase exercises (0-6 weeks):

  • Ankle pumps: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion in boot
  • Alphabet exercises: trace alphabet with foot (ROM)
  • Towel scrunches: picking up towel with toes (intrinsic strengthening)
  • Isometric contractions: push against resistance without motion

Intermediate phase (6-12 weeks):

  • Resistance band exercises:
    • Dorsiflexion: band around forefoot, pull toes toward shin
    • Plantarflexion: push forefoot away against band
    • Inversion: pull foot inward against band
    • Eversion: push foot outward against band
  • Heel raises: bilateral progressing to unilateral
  • Toe raises: strengthen tibialis anterior
  • Balance exercises: single leg stance on firm surface
    • Progress to unstable surface (foam pad, balance board)

Advanced phase (12+ weeks):

  • Plyometrics: box jumps, single leg hops
  • Agility drills: ladder drills, cone drills, cutting
  • Sport-specific exercises: simulate sport movements
  • Single leg hop test: assess readiness for return to sport

Return to sport criteria:

  • No pain with running or cutting
  • Full ROM compared to contralateral (especially dorsiflexion)
  • Strength 90% of contralateral (heel raise, single leg hop)
  • Passed functional testing (hop test, agility)
  • Confidence with sport-specific movements

Brace recommendations:

  • Lace-up ankle brace for first 3-6 months of sport participation
  • Taping may be used as alternative
  • Gradual weaning from brace as confidence improves

Structured rehabilitation is essential for optimal outcomes.

Prevention and Return to Sport

Prevention strategies:

1. Neuromuscular training:

  • Proprioceptive exercises in pre-season training
  • Balance and agility drills
  • Core and hip strengthening (improves lower extremity control)

2. Ankle bracing or taping:

  • Prophylactic bracing in high-risk sports (football, basketball)
  • Reduces incidence of ankle injuries by 30-50%
  • Lace-up braces or high-top shoes provide lateral support

3. Field maintenance:

  • Avoid holes, uneven surfaces
  • Proper footwear for surface type

4. Conditioning:

  • Adequate warm-up before activity
  • Gradual increase in training intensity
  • Avoid fatigue (injury risk increases when fatigued)

Return to sport decision-making:

Objective criteria (must meet all):

  • Pain-free: no pain with weight bearing, running, cutting
  • ROM: full dorsiflexion (critical for push-off), equal to contralateral
  • Strength: 90% of contralateral on single leg heel raise, hop test
  • Functional testing: single leg hop greater than 90% of contralateral
  • Radiographic stability: no diastasis on stress views

Subjective criteria:

  • Athlete confidence with cutting and jumping
  • No apprehension or fear of re-injury

Graduated return protocol:

  1. Week 1: straight-line jogging (50% effort)
  2. Week 2: increased pace, longer distances (75% effort)
  3. Week 3: change of direction, cutting at 50% speed
  4. Week 4: sport-specific drills at increasing intensity
  5. Week 5: non-contact practice
  6. Week 6+: full contact practice, then return to competition

Timeline expectations:

  • Conservative treatment: 8-12 weeks
  • Screw fixation: 20-28 weeks (including screw removal time)
  • Suture button: 12-16 weeks

Re-injury prevention:

  • Continue proprioceptive training indefinitely
  • Use ankle brace for 6-12 months after return
  • Maintain strength and conditioning

High Re-injury Risk

Athletes who return to sport before meeting objective criteria have a significantly higher re-injury rate. The prolonged recovery time for syndesmotic injuries is frustrating for athletes but essential for proper healing. Premature return leads to chronic instability.

Evidence Base

Screw vs Suture Button: Meta-analysis

I
Lubberts et al. • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 7 RCTs comparing screw vs suture button fixation
  • No significant difference in functional outcomes (AOFAS scores, VAS pain)
  • Suture button had lower re-operation rate (no need for removal): RR 0.23
  • Screw fixation had higher malreduction rate: 16% vs 7%
  • Return to sport faster with suture button: 14 weeks vs 22 weeks
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Clear Space Measurement: Diagnostic Accuracy

III
Harper and Keller • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Analyzed normal ankle radiographs to establish syndesmotic measurements
  • Tibiofibular clear space on mortise view: mean 4.0mm (range 2-6mm)
  • Clear space greater than 6mm is abnormal (sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%)
  • Tibiofibular overlap on AP: mean 10mm (range 6-15mm)
  • Overlap less than 6mm suggests diastasis
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Cotton Test for Intraoperative Assessment

III
Beumer et al. • J Orthop Trauma (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Cadaver study assessing lateral fibular translation with syndesmotic disruption
  • Intact syndesmosis: mean translation 0.5mm
  • Complete disruption: mean translation 5.2mm
  • Greater than 2mm translation indicates instability requiring fixation
  • Side-to-side difference of 1mm is clinically significant
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Malreduction and Arthritis Risk

II
Weening and Bhandari • J Orthop Trauma (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of syndesmotic injuries with minimum 2-year follow-up
  • Malreduction (greater than 2mm diastasis post-operatively) in 52% of cases
  • Arthritis rate: 42% in malreduced group vs 14% in anatomic reduction group
  • Even 1mm malreduction increased contact pressure by 40% in biomechanical studies
  • Functional outcomes worse with malreduction (AOFAS 68 vs 88)
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Tricortical vs Quadricortical Fixation

II
Kukreti et al. • Foot Ankle Int (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Biomechanical study comparing 3-cortex vs 4-cortex screw fixation
  • Both provide adequate stability for healing
  • 4-cortex fixation more rigid but higher screw breakage rate: 46% vs 18%
  • 3-cortex allows some physiologic motion (1mm), may be more anatomic
  • Clinical outcomes equivalent between groups
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Isolated Syndesmotic Injury in Athlete

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old male rugby player presents 3 days after sustaining an external rotation injury to his ankle during a tackle. He describes immediate pain above the ankle joint and difficulty bearing weight. Ottawa ankle rules applied - radiographs show no fracture. Squeeze test is positive. Mortise view shows clear space of 5.5mm. External rotation stress views show clear space widening to 7mm, with 2mm difference compared to contralateral side. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a West Point subluxation syndesmotic injury in a high-demand athlete. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would confirm the diagnosis with a thorough history and examination. The mechanism (external rotation), location of pain (above the ankle), positive squeeze test, and stress radiographs showing diastasis all support syndesmotic injury. Second, I would assess severity using the West Point classification. The static films show borderline clear space (5.5mm), but stress views demonstrate instability (widening to 7mm). This is a subluxation pattern. Third, my management would be operative syndesmotic fixation given his athletic demands and documented instability on stress testing. I would discuss options of screw versus suture button - I favor suture button in this scenario for faster rehabilitation and no need for removal. Surgery would involve anatomic reduction under fluoroscopy (ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation) followed by suture button fixation. Post-operatively, he would have early weight bearing and motion, progressing to sport-specific training by 12 weeks. I would counsel that return to rugby would be approximately 14-16 weeks, significantly longer than a typical lateral ankle sprain, and that he should use an ankle brace for the first season back.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize West Point subluxation based on stress views showing instability
Operative fixation indicated for high-demand athlete with documented instability
Suture button allows faster return to sport (14-16 weeks vs 20-24 weeks with screw)
Emphasize anatomic reduction (ankle in dorsiflexion) to prevent malreduction
Set expectations: longer recovery than lateral sprain, need for brace on return
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating this conservatively despite athletic demands and stress instability - may lead to chronic pain
✗Using screw fixation without discussing suture button option in athlete
✗Not obtaining bilateral stress views for comparison
✗Promising early return to sport (under 12 weeks) - sets unrealistic expectations
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if stress views were equivocal? Consider MRI to assess ligament injury extent, or trial of conservative management with close follow-up"
"How would management differ if he were 55 years old and sedentary? Consider conservative management with boot for 6 weeks, reserve surgery for persistent symptoms"
"What are the risks of conservative management in this case? Risk of chronic instability, prolonged pain, difficulty returning to sport at previous level"
"Describe your surgical technique for suture button fixation. Reduce syndesmosis, drill 4mm hole from fibula to tibia 2-3cm above plafond at 30-degree anterior-posterior angle, pass device, flip tibial button, tension sutures, confirm reduction on fluoroscopy"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Ankle Fracture with Syndesmotic Injury (Maisonneuve)

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old female presents with an ankle injury after a fall. She has swelling and tenderness over the medial malleolus and proximal fibula. Ankle radiographs show a medial malleolus fracture and widened medial clear space, but the fibula appears intact distally. Proximal tibia-fibula radiographs show a proximal fibula fracture. What is your diagnosis and surgical plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Maisonneuve fracture pattern: a Lauge-Hansen pronation-external rotation Stage IV injury with proximal fibular fracture, complete syndesmotic disruption, and medial malleolus fracture or deltoid rupture. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would complete my clinical examination, palpating the entire fibula and assessing neurovascular status, particularly the common peroneal nerve at the fibular neck. Second, I would obtain stress views of the ankle to confirm syndesmotic instability if not already obvious on static films. Third, my surgical plan would be: (1) Fix the medial malleolus with two cancellous screws or tension band construct. (2) Perform intraoperative Cotton test under fluoroscopy to assess syndesmotic stability. (3) The syndesmosis will be unstable given the mechanism and radiographic findings, so I would proceed with syndesmotic fixation using either one or two screws or a suture button device. The proximal fibula fracture does not require fixation as stability is restored by syndesmotic and medial fixation. (4) Post-operatively, the patient would be non-weight bearing for 6 weeks, then progress weight bearing after screw removal at 8-12 weeks if using screws, or earlier mobilization if using suture button. I would counsel about prolonged recovery (4-6 months) and risk of post-traumatic arthritis if anatomic reduction not achieved.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize Maisonneuve fracture: proximal fibula fracture + syndesmotic disruption + medial injury
Complete syndesmotic disruption present - requires fixation even though distal fibula intact
Surgical sequence: medial fixation first, then assess syndesmosis with Cotton test, then syndesmotic fixation
Proximal fibula fracture does NOT need fixation - stability restored by distal fixation
Assess common peroneal nerve due to proximal fibula fracture
COMMON TRAPS
✗Fixing the proximal fibula fracture - not necessary and adds morbidity
✗Missing the syndesmotic injury because distal fibula looks normal on X-ray
✗Not performing Cotton test intraoperatively to confirm instability
✗Failing to mention common peroneal nerve assessment
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why doesn't the proximal fibula fracture need fixation? Ankle stability is restored by medial and syndesmotic fixation. The fibula is a non-weight-bearing bone. Proximal fracture will heal with immobilization."
"What is your threshold for syndesmotic fixation in this case? With Maisonneuve pattern, syndesmosis is always disrupted. I would fix based on mechanism alone, but would confirm with Cotton test showing greater than 2mm translation."
"How do you assess for malreduction post-operatively? Check clear space less than 6mm, overlap greater than 6mm on AP and greater than 1mm on mortise. Consider CT scan if any concern for fibular malposition or rotation."
"What if the medial malleolus is not fractured but the medial clear space is wide? This indicates deltoid ligament rupture. Controversial whether to repair deltoid. I would reduce and fix the syndesmosis, which often closes the medial clear space. If medial space remains wide despite syndesmotic fixation, consider deltoid repair."
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Post-operative Malreduction

EXAMINER

"You are asked to review a patient in clinic 2 weeks after syndesmotic screw fixation for an ankle fracture. The patient reports persistent pain and difficulty mobilizing. You obtain radiographs and notice the tibiofibular clear space is 7mm on the mortise view. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a syndesmotic malreduction, which is a significant complication that requires urgent attention. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would review the post-operative radiographs in detail - the clear space of 7mm on mortise view is abnormal (should be less than 6mm) and suggests diastasis. I would also check tibiofibular overlap and fibular position on all views. Second, I would obtain a CT scan to fully assess the fibular position in the incisura, looking for over-compression, external rotation malreduction, or anterior-posterior malposition. Even 1mm of malreduction increases contact pressures by 40% and significantly increases arthritis risk. Third, given that this is only 2 weeks post-operatively, I would strongly recommend revision surgery to restore anatomic reduction. The ligaments have not yet healed, making revision technically easier now than if delayed. Fourth, my surgical plan for revision would be: remove the existing screw, reduce the syndesmosis anatomically under fluoroscopy (ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation, gentle clamp application, confirm reduction on AP, mortise, and lateral views), and insert new fixation. I would consider suture button to allow some physiologic motion and avoid over-compression. Finally, I would counsel the patient that early revision has good outcomes but that any malreduction carries increased arthritis risk long-term, so anatomic reduction is critical. Post-operatively, protected weight bearing for 6-8 weeks.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize malreduction immediately - clear space greater than 6mm is abnormal
CT scan to fully assess fibular position and rotation
Early revision (within 2-3 weeks) is essential - outcomes worsen with delay
Even 1mm malreduction significantly increases arthritis risk
Surgical plan: remove hardware, re-reduce anatomically, confirm on all fluoroscopy views, re-fix
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting the malreduction and planning to 'watch it' - will lead to arthritis
✗Delaying revision beyond 3 weeks - becomes much more difficult as healing progresses
✗Not obtaining CT scan to fully characterize the malreduction
✗Blaming patient symptoms on 'expected post-operative pain' rather than recognizing malreduction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the common causes of malreduction? Over-compression with reduction clamp, external rotation of fibula during fixation, ankle not in dorsiflexion during fixation, lagging the screw, inadequate fluoroscopic assessment intraoperatively"
"How do you prevent malreduction? Ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation, gentle clamp application, check reduction on AP, mortise, and lateral views before inserting fixation, do not lag the screw, consider using suture button which allows physiologic motion"
"What if the patient refuses revision surgery? Counsel extensively about arthritis risk. If patient adamant, conservative management with activity modification, bracing, close monitoring. Likely will develop arthritis and may need fusion or replacement in future."
"At what point is revision no longer feasible? After 3-4 weeks, fibrous tissue and healing make revision much more difficult. After 3 months, ligaments have healed in malreduced position and revision is unlikely to improve anatomy significantly."

MCQ Practice Points

Q: Which ligament of the syndesmosis tears FIRST in external rotation injuries?

Answer: AITFL (Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament)

The sequential failure pattern is: AITFL → IOL → PITFL. The AITFL is relatively weaker and positioned anteriorly where it receives maximal tension during external rotation. The PITFL is the strongest component (42% of stability) and tears last.

Q: What is the threshold for tibiofibular clear space on mortise view that indicates syndesmotic diastasis?

Answer: Greater than 6mm

Harper and Keller (1989) established that a clear space greater than 6mm on mortise view has 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity for syndesmotic diastasis. This is measured 1cm above the tibial plafond on the mortise radiograph.

Q: A 25-year-old footballer has a proximal fibula fracture, medial malleolus fracture, and no distal fibula fracture on X-ray. What is the diagnosis and does the syndesmosis need fixation?

Answer: Maisonneuve fracture - YES, syndesmosis requires fixation

This is a Maisonneuve fracture pattern (Lauge-Hansen PER IV). The entire syndesmosis is disrupted from the proximal fibula fracture down to the ankle. The distal fibula appears intact but the syndesmotic ligaments are completely torn. Fix the medial malleolus, then perform Cotton test to confirm syndesmotic instability, then fix syndesmosis. Do NOT fix the proximal fibula fracture.

Q: During syndesmotic screw fixation, should the ankle be positioned in plantarflexion or dorsiflexion?

Answer: Dorsiflexion

The talus is wider anteriorly by 2-3mm. Positioning the ankle in dorsiflexion locks the wider anterior talus in the mortise, preventing over-compression of the syndesmosis. If the ankle is in plantarflexion during fixation, the narrower posterior talus allows over-compression, and when the patient dorsiflexes post-operatively, the ankle will be too tight.

Q: What is the Cotton test and what threshold indicates the need for syndesmotic fixation?

Answer: Lateral fibular translation test - greater than 2mm requires fixation

The Cotton test assesses lateral translation of the fibula relative to the tibia. The examiner grasps the calcaneus and talus and translates laterally while palpating the fibula. Greater than 2mm of translation (compared to contralateral side) indicates syndesmotic instability requiring fixation. This is often performed intraoperatively under anesthesia after fibula or medial malleolus fixation.

Q: What is the primary advantage of suture button fixation over screw fixation?

Answer: Allows physiologic motion and faster return to sport (no removal needed)

Suture button (TightRope) allows 1-2mm of physiologic syndesmotic motion, permits earlier weight bearing and range of motion, and does not require removal. This translates to faster return to sport: 12-16 weeks vs 20-28 weeks with screw fixation. RCTs show equivalent functional outcomes but lower re-operation rate with suture button.

Q: How much does 1mm of lateral fibular malreduction increase tibiotalar contact pressure?

Answer: 40% increase in contact pressure

Biomechanical cadaver studies show that even 1mm of lateral fibular displacement reduces tibiotalar contact area by 42% and increases peak contact pressure by 40%. This explains the high rate of post-traumatic arthritis with malreduction and why anatomic reduction is essential.

Q: Which clinical test has the highest sensitivity for syndesmotic injury?

Answer: Squeeze test (sensitivity 30-92%)

The squeeze test involves compressing the tibia and fibula together at mid-calf level. Pain at the ankle (not at the compression site) indicates syndesmotic disruption. It has the highest sensitivity of the clinical tests, though no single test is perfectly sensitive. External rotation stress test is more specific.

High-yield MCQ topics:

Anatomy:

  • AITFL tears first in external rotation injuries
  • PITFL is the strongest component (42% of stability)
  • Inferior transverse ligament is the deep portion of PITFL
  • Sequential failure: AITFL → IOL → PITFL

Clinical examination:

  • Squeeze test: most sensitive (compress at mid-calf, pain at ankle)
  • External rotation stress test: most specific
  • Cotton test: assess lateral fibular translation (greater than 2mm = unstable)
  • All tests should be compared to contralateral side

Radiographic assessment:

  • Clear space greater than 6mm on mortise view = diastasis
  • Tibiofibular overlap less than 6mm on AP or less than 1mm on mortise = abnormal
  • Medial clear space should equal superior clear space
  • Stress views needed if static films equivocal

Classification:

  • West Point: latent (stable), subluxation (unstable with stress), dislocation (frank diastasis)
  • Maisonneuve: PER IV injury - proximal fibula fracture + complete syndesmotic disruption

Surgical technique:

  • Position ankle in dorsiflexion and neutral rotation during fixation
  • Screw placed 2-3cm above plafond, 30 degrees anterior to posterior
  • Tricortical vs quadricortical: both effective, tricortical lower breakage rate
  • Suture button allows physiologic motion and faster return to sport

Outcomes:

  • 1mm malreduction increases contact pressure by 40%
  • Screw vs suture button: equivalent outcomes, suture button faster return to sport
  • Return to sport: 8-12 weeks conservative, 12-16 weeks suture button, 20-28 weeks screw
  • Arthritis risk 10-30% at 5-10 years, higher with malreduction

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Syndesmotic injuries common in Australian Rules Football (AFL) due to tackling mechanism
  • Also prevalent in rugby league, rugby union, and soccer
  • Sports medicine clinics report 5-10% of ankle injuries involve syndesmosis in contact sports

Management guidelines:

  • Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA) supports evidence-based approach to syndesmotic fixation
  • No specific Australian guidelines, but practitioners follow international evidence (screw vs suture button both accepted)

PBS medications:

  • Analgesia: Paracetamol + codeine (co-codamol) - PBS listed
  • NSAIDs: Ibuprofen, naproxen - avoid prolonged use due to bone healing concerns (limited PBS subsidy for short courses)
  • DVT prophylaxis: Enoxaparin (Clexane) - PBS listed for post-operative prophylaxis in lower limb surgery

Australian injury compensation:

  • WorkCover (varies by state): syndesmotic injuries eligible for compensation if work-related
  • Transport Accident Commission (TAC) in Victoria: covers syndesmotic injuries from motor vehicle accidents
  • Return to work timelines: sedentary work 6-8 weeks, manual labor 12-16 weeks, contact sport athletes 14-28 weeks depending on fixation method

Sports insurance:

  • AFL players' insurance typically covers syndesmotic surgery and rehabilitation
  • Private health insurance usually covers syndesmotic surgery as it's considered medically necessary (not cosmetic)

Research contributions:

  • Australian centres have contributed to biomechanical research on syndesmotic fixation
  • Ongoing studies on suture button vs screw fixation outcomes in AFL players

SYNDESMOTIC INSTABILITY - EXAM CHEAT SHEET

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •AITFL: tears first, 35% of stability
  • •IOL: interosseous ligament, 22% stability
  • •PITFL: strongest, 42% stability, tears last
  • •ITL: deep PITFL, labrum-like function
  • •Sequential failure: AITFL → IOL → PITFL

Mechanism and Epidemiology

  • •External rotation of foot on planted ankle
  • •1-11% of all ankle sprains, 23% of ankle fractures
  • •Common in contact sports: rugby, AFL, football
  • •Maisonneuve: proximal fibula fracture + complete syndesmotic disruption

Clinical Tests (Compare to Contralateral)

  • •Squeeze test: most sensitive (compress mid-calf, pain at ankle)
  • •External rotation stress: most specific
  • •Cotton test: greater than 2mm fibular translation = unstable
  • •Palpate entire fibula (rule out Maisonneuve)

Radiographic Assessment

  • •Mortise view: clear space greater than 6mm = diastasis (MOST IMPORTANT)
  • •AP: tibiofibular overlap less than 6mm abnormal
  • •Mortise: overlap less than 1mm abnormal
  • •Stress views if equivocal (bilateral for comparison)
  • •Medial clear space = superior clear space (if wider = deltoid injury)

West Point Classification

  • •Latent: stable on stress → conservative
  • •Subluxation: unstable on stress → consider fixation (athlete)
  • •Dislocation: frank diastasis → operative mandatory

Surgical Technique Principles

  • •Ankle in DORSIFLEXION and NEUTRAL rotation (critical)
  • •Screw 2-3cm above plafond, 30° anterior-posterior
  • •Tricortical (3 cortices) vs quadricortical (4 cortices) - both work, tricortical less breakage
  • •Cotton test intraop: greater than 2mm translation = fix
  • •Check reduction: AP, mortise, lateral fluoroscopy

Screw vs Suture Button

  • •Screw: rigid, remove at 8-12 weeks, RTP 20-28 weeks
  • •Button: allows motion, no removal, RTP 12-16 weeks
  • •Both equivalent outcomes, button faster rehab
  • •Button higher cost but lower re-operation rate

Complications

  • •Malreduction (20-50%): even 1mm → 40% increased contact pressure
  • •Screw breakage: 25-50% if not removed by 12 weeks
  • •Post-traumatic arthritis: 10-30% at 5-10 years (higher with malreduction)
  • •Chronic instability: inadequate initial fixation, premature removal

Return to Sport

  • •Conservative: 8-12 weeks (latent injuries)
  • •Suture button: 12-16 weeks
  • •Screw: 20-28 weeks (includes removal time)
  • •Criteria: pain-free, full ROM, 90% strength, functional testing
  • •Use ankle brace for 6-12 months after return

Critical Numbers to Remember

  • •6mm: clear space threshold on mortise view
  • •1mm: malreduction increases pressure by 40%
  • •2mm: Cotton test translation threshold
  • •2-3cm: screw distance above plafond
  • •30°: screw trajectory (anterior-posterior)
  • •8-12 weeks: screw removal timing

References

  1. Hermans JJ, Beumer A, de Jong TA, Kleinrensink GJ. Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach. J Anat. 2010;217(6):633-645. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01302.x

  2. Waterman BR, Belmont PJ, Cameron KL, Deberardino TM, Owens BD. Epidemiology of ankle sprain at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):797-803. doi:10.1177/0363546509350757

  3. Nussbaum ED, Hosea TM, Sieler SD, Incremona BR, Kessler DE. Prospective evaluation of syndesmotic ankle sprains without diastasis. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(1):31-35. doi:10.1177/03635465010290010301

  4. Hunt KJ, Phisitkul P, Pirolo J, Amendola A. High ankle sprains and syndesmotic injuries in athletes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(11):661-673. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-13-00135

  5. van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, Florio P, Maltese L, Ciuffreda M, Denaro V. Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1200-1216. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3942-8

  6. Harper MC, Keller TS. A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(3):156-160. doi:10.1177/107110078901000308

  7. Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Swierstra BA, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM. A biomechanical evaluation of the tibiofibular and tibiotalar ligaments of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):426-429. doi:10.1177/107110070302400509

  8. Alonso A, Khoury L, Adams R. Clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury: reliability and prediction of return to function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(4):276-284. doi:10.2519/jospt.1998.27.4.276

  9. Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae K, Linklater J, Black DA, Nicholson LL, Refshauge KM. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):323-329. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092787

  10. Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, Wright RW, Fritts H, Boyd JL, Fischer DA. Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(5):371-378. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.0371

  11. Lubberts B, Verhaven E, D'Hooghe P, Vereecke E, van Dijk CN. Epidemiology and return to play following isolated syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: a prospective cohort study of 3677 male professional footballers in the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(15):959-964. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097710

  12. Weening B, Bhandari M. Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(2):102-108. doi:10.1097/00005131-200502000-00006

  13. Kukreti S, Faraj A, Miles JN. Does position of syndesmotic screw affect functional and radiological outcome in ankle fractures? Injury. 2005;36(9):1121-1124. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.02.015

  14. Lubberts B, Vopat BG, Wolf JC, Linn MS, Guss D, Nahed R, DiGiovanni CW. Arthroscopically assisted syndesmotic reduction: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(8):1585-1594. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.005

  15. Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, Zwipp H. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):392-397. doi:10.1177/107110070302400504

  16. Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, de Vries MR, Van der Elst M. Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures. Injury. 2011;42(10):1125-1129. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.009

  17. Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, MacLeod MD. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):2-6. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a9f7a5

  18. Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L, van den Bekerom MP, Glazebrook M, Pelet S. A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(5):216-223. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000245

  19. Andersen MR, Frihagen F, Hellund JC, Madsen JE, Figved W. Randomized trial comparing suture button with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(1):2-12. doi:10.2106/JBJS.16.01011

  20. Kortekangas TH, Flinkkilä T, Niinimäki J, Leskelä HV, Savolainen V, Pakarinen H, Ohtonen P, Ristiniemi J. A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-1126. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004

Quick Stats
Reading Time174 min
Related Topics

Achilles Tendon Rupture

Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Calcaneal Fractures

Charcot Neuroarthropathy