Ankle Arthrodesis
Ankle arthrodesis (open and arthroscopic) for FRCS/FRACS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Tibiotalar fusion via open (anterior/lateral) or arthroscopic approach | intermediate
Surgical Imaging
Imaging Gallery



Critical Danger Structures
Danger 1: Sural Nerve
Sural nerve (lateral approach). Location: Posterior to lateral malleolus, runs with short saphenous vein approximately 1 cm posterior to fibula in the distal leg. At risk during lateral approach, posterolateral portal placement, and fibula osteotomy. Protection: Identify and protect the nerve before incision in the posterolateral quarter; retract with vein. Injury causes painful dysaesthesia over lateral foot and fifth toe.
Danger 2: Superficial Peroneal Nerve
Superficial peroneal nerve (anterolateral approach). Location: Pierces deep fascia 10–12 cm proximal to tip of lateral malleolus; dorsal branch runs anterior to fibula toward the fourth toe. At risk during anterolateral portal or lateral incision placement. Protection: Plantarflex and invert foot to make nerve taut and visible; mark and avoid. Injury causes dysaesthesia over dorsum of foot.
Danger 3: Neurovascular Bundle
Dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve (anterior approach). Location: DP artery lies between EHL and EDL tendons, deep peroneal nerve is immediately lateral to the artery on the anterior ankle. At risk during anterior plate application, aggressive retraction, and cartilage débridement. Protection: Identify and retract the bundle medially with EHL; apply anterior plate lateral to neurovascular bundle. Injury causes foot ischaemia or dorsal sensory loss.
Danger 4: Malposition — Equinus / Varus
Fusion malposition. The most common cause of poor functional outcome and revision surgery is equinus (plantarflexion) or varus fusion. Even 5° equinus translates to a 1.5 cm functional leg length discrepancy and abnormal knee stress. Prevention: Confirm position with intra-operative fluoroscopy in both AP and lateral planes before definitive screw placement. Use contralateral limb stance as reference for rotation.
Danger 5: Wound Healing — Anterior Approach
Anterior wound breakdown. The anterior ankle has sparse soft tissue coverage and a tenuous blood supply, making wound dehiscence and deep infection a serious risk, particularly in diabetic and Charcot patients. Protection: Handle soft tissues meticulously with full-thickness flaps; avoid skin tension at closure; consider staged closure or local flap in high-risk patients. Early recognition and aggressive management of wound problems prevents catastrophic deep infection.
FVERTFVERT — Ideal Fusion Position
SCANSCAN — Non-Union Risk Factors
Primary Indications
Absolute Indications
- End-stage tibiotalar osteoarthritis (primary, post-traumatic, or rheumatoid) with failed conservative management (minimum 3–6 months of NSAIDs, physiotherapy, intra-articular injection, ankle-foot orthosis)
- Tibiotalar OA following failed ORIF with retained or removed metalwork and joint destruction
- Charcot neuroarthropathy of the ankle with instability or ulcer risk
- Ankle instability with severe arthritis or after failed ligamentous reconstruction with arthritic change
- Failed total ankle replacement with inadequate bone stock for revision TAR
Relative Indications
- Avascular necrosis of the talus with joint involvement
- Septic arthritis with residual tibiotalar destruction (staged: eradicate infection, then fuse)
- Ankle tumour resection requiring reconstruction with fusion
- Severe coronal or sagittal deformity not correctable by realignment osteotomy alone
Contraindications
- Active deep infection (relative — staged approach possible)
- Severe ipsilateral hindfoot or midfoot arthritis limiting compensatory motion
- Contralateral lower limb amputation (fusion prevents compensatory gait adaptation)
- Unrealistic patient expectations regarding functional outcome
Optimal Fusion Position
The four-point position is non-negotiable and must be confirmed fluoroscopically:
Sagittal plane — 0° (neutral): Neutral dorsiflexion aligns ankle joint reaction force through the tibia. Even 5° of equinus shifts loading to the forefoot, increases knee flexion demand, and is perceived as a functional leg length shortening.
Coronal plane — 5° valgus: Slight hindfoot valgus maintains the subtalar axis of compensation. Varus fusion is poorly tolerated, causing lateral border overload, peroneal tendon stress, and sural nerve symptoms.
Axial rotation — 5–10° external rotation: Must match the contralateral limb. Assessed clinically by comparing the second-toe axis. Excess external rotation causes compensatory knee external rotation stress; internal rotation causes patellofemoral pain.
Sagittal translation — mild posterior shift: Positioning the talus slightly posterior under the tibia shortens the anterior lever arm and reduces stress on the midfoot during terminal stance. Anterior talar subluxation increases midfoot loading significantly.
Key Evidence
Arthroscopic vs Open Arthrodesis
Townshend et al. (2013): Multicentre comparative case series of 60 patients (30 arthroscopic, 30 open) followed for 2 years. The primary outcome (Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale) and SF-36 physical component improved significantly in both groups; improvement was significantly greater and hospital stay shorter in the arthroscopic group, while complications, surgical time and radiographic alignment were similar.
Zvijac et al. (2002): Retrospective series of 21 arthroscopically assisted fusions; 20 of 21 (95%) united at a mean of 8.9 weeks. The single failure had extensive talar avascular necrosis (approximately 50% of the talus), reinforcing AVN and deformity as relative contraindications to the arthroscopic technique.
Ogilvie-Harris et al. (1993): 19 arthroscopically assisted fusions in ankles with minimal/no deformity, fixed with three percutaneous cannulated screws; 17 of 19 united (2 non-unions), with excellent or good results in 16. Established arthroscopic technique as viable for non-deformed arthritic ankles.
Current Recommendation: Arthroscopic arthrodesis is preferred for end-stage ankle OA without significant deformity (generally less than 15°) or talar AVN. Open technique is required for major deformity correction, Charcot arthropathy, bone loss requiring graft, or revision procedures.
Long-term Outcomes After Fusion
Coester et al. (2001): 23 patients with isolated post-traumatic ankle arthrodesis followed a mean of 22 years (longest follow-up reported). Ipsilateral subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, naviculocuneiform, tarsometatarsal and first MTP arthritis were all significantly more severe than the contralateral side (each p less than 0.01), with significantly worse activity limitation, pain and disability — establishing accelerated adjacent-joint degeneration as the long-term cost of fusion. The knee was not significantly affected.
Hendrickx et al. (2011): Single-centre retrospective study of 60 patients (66 ankles) fused with a two-incision, three-screw technique. Primary union rate 91% (six required re-arthrodesis), mean AOFAS 67 and 91% satisfaction at a mean 9-year follow-up; significant radiographic progression of arthritis was seen in all adjacent joints.
Key Evidence
Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicentre comparative case series
Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis
Risk factors for nonunion following ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicentre study
Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"A 48-year-old construction worker presents with 3 years of right ankle pain following a pilon fracture treated with ORIF 5 years ago. He has failed 12 months of NSAIDs, physiotherapy, intra-articular steroid injections, and an ankle-foot orthosis. Weight-bearing AP and lateral radiographs show complete tibiotalar joint space loss with subchondral sclerosis and a 10° varus deformity. He smokes 20 cigarettes per day. What is your assessment and plan?"
"A 58-year-old woman had an ankle arthrodesis 8 months ago. She never became pain-free. CT scan shows no osseous bridging across the tibiotalar joint. She has fibrous union. What are the risk factors for non-union, how do you investigate this patient, and what is your management?"
"A 62-year-old retired teacher has end-stage primary ankle osteoarthritis with mild-to-moderate tibiotalar joint space loss, 5° valgus deformity, preserved subtalar motion, and no prior ankle surgery. She asks you to compare ankle arthrodesis with total ankle replacement and help her decide. What are the key differences and how would you counsel her?"
Ankle Arthrodesis — Exam Summary
Clinical summary
References
-
Townshend D, Di Silvestro M, Krause F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(2):98-102. PMID 23235956. Comparative case series (30 arthroscopic vs 30 open) showing comparable complications and alignment with greater early Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale improvement and shorter stay arthroscopically.
-
Zvijac JE, Lemak L, Schurhoff MR, Hechtman KS, Uribe JW. Analysis of arthroscopically assisted ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(1):70-75. PMID 11774145. Retrospective series of 21 arthroscopic fusions; 20/21 (95%) united at mean 8.9 weeks, the single failure having extensive talar AVN.
-
Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2):219-228. PMID 11216683. Landmark 22-year follow-up (23 patients) demonstrating significantly accelerated ipsilateral subtalar, talonavicular and midfoot arthritis after tibiotalar fusion.
-
Hendrickx RP, Stufkens SA, de Bruijn EE, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM. Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(10):940-947. PMID 22224322. Retrospective study of 60 patients (66 ankles) with a two-incision three-screw technique; 91% primary union and good function at a mean 9 years.
-
Patel S, Baker L, Perez J, Vulcano E, Kaplan J, Aiyer A. Risk factors for nonunion following ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021;16(1):60-77. PMID 33660542. Meta-analysis (13 studies, 987 patients) identifying smoking, male sex and prior infection as strong predictors of non-union.
-
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Lieberman I, Fitsialos D. Arthroscopically assisted arthrodesis for osteoarthrotic ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(8):1167-1174. PMID 8354675. Original series of 19 arthroscopic fusions with three-screw fixation; 17/19 united (2 non-unions), establishing the technique for non-deformed ankles.
-
Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):579-596. PMID 19589303. Non-randomised multicentre controlled (concurrent fusion controls) non-inferiority trial; equivalent pain relief and better function with STAR TAR at 24 months, with more secondary procedures.
-
Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M, et al. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):135-142. PMID 24430413. Prospective cohort (388 ankles) showing comparable patient-reported outcomes but higher reoperation (17% vs 7%) and major complications (19% vs 7%) after TAR than fusion.
-
Clough TM, Ring J. Total ankle arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(4):696-703. PMID 33789488. Single-centre series of 118 Zenith TAAs with 88% implant survival at 7 years, comparable to National Joint Registry data.
-
Myerson MS, Alvarez RG, Lam PW. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis for the management of severe ankle and hindfoot deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(8):643-650. Technique description and outcomes for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde intramedullary nailing for complex hindfoot pathology including Charcot arthropathy.