Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Ankle Fracture ORIF - Weber B/C Fibula with Medial Malleolus

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaIntermediateCore Procedure

Ankle Fracture ORIF - Weber B/C Fibula with Medial Malleolus

How to perform ORIF of a Weber B/C fibula fracture with a medial malleolus fracture — the lateral fibular and medial malleolar exposures laid out step by step, fibular length and rotation, syndesmotic assessment (Cotton and Hook tests), and the medial malleolar fixation decision. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
24
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Bimalleolar ankle fracture · Fix the fibula first, then the medial malleolus, then confirm the mortise

traumaSubspecialty
Fibula firstCore principle
5Danger structures
90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Fibular length restoration is paramount — even 2mm of shortening causes talar shift, medial clear space widening, and accelerated arthritis.
  • Assess the syndesmosis after fibular fixation with the Cotton test (external rotation stress) and the Hook test (lateral stress) under fluoroscopy.
  • On the mortise view (15-20 degrees internal rotation) the medial clear space must be less than 4mm, the tibiofibular overlap greater than 6mm, and the joint space symmetric 360 degrees.
  • The soft tissue envelope dictates timing — delay surgery for the wrinkle sign (7-14 days) if there is severe swelling or fracture blisters.

When & Why


Indications for surgery. Operate when the ankle mortise is, or is at risk of becoming, incongruent: - Talar shift on weight-bearing or stress radiographs — a medial clear space greater than 4mm.

  • A bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture pattern (inherently unstable).
  • A bimalleolar equivalent injury — a lateral malleolar fracture with a deltoid rupture and a medial clear space greater than 4mm.
  • Weber B with a medial injury (malleolar fracture or deltoid rupture) or a syndesmotic injury.
  • Weber C (fracture above the syndesmosis) — typically unstable, almost always needing surgery.
  • A posterior malleolar fragment involving greater than 25 percent of the plafond, or with greater than 2mm of articular step-off.
  • An isolated, displaced Weber B in a young active patient where anatomic reduction is the goal. Weber type alone does not define stability. A Weber B can be stable or unstable depending on the medial structures and the syndesmosis, and even a Weber A is unstable if there is an associated medial injury. Assess stability systematically across four axes — the lateral fibula, the medial structures (malleolus versus deltoid), the syndesmosis, and the posterior malleolus. Soft tissue timing is as important as technique. If the soft tissue envelope is compromised (severe swelling, fracture blisters, skin compromise), delay definitive fixation until the wrinkle sign appears — typically 7-14 days — while holding the fracture reduced in a well-padded posterior splint with strict elevation. Exceptions requiring urgent surgery are an open fracture, compartment syndrome, skin tenting or vascular compromise. Operating through compromised soft tissues drives wound complications up to 10-30 percent, especially over the medial malleolus in diabetics and peripheral vascular disease. Consent specifically for wound complications and infection (highest over the medial malleolus), sensory nerve injury (saphenous, sural, superficial peroneal) and painful neuroma, hardware prominence and the possible need for removal, post-traumatic arthritis developing in 15-30 percent at 10-20 years despite anatomic reduction, and the small risk of deep venous thrombosis. Setup. Supine on a radiolucent table with a bump under the ipsilateral hip to internally rotate the leg 15-20 degrees (bringing the posterolateral fibula anterior for exposure), the knee flexed 30-45 degrees over a triangle or the break in the table, and the C-arm brought in from the contralateral side for AP, mortise and lateral views. A thigh tourniquet improves visualization but should be released before closure; consider a tourniquet-free technique when the soft tissues are marginal. Have the contralateral ankle images available — they are the template for fibular length.

The Operation


The goal is anatomic restoration of the ankle mortise. The fibula determines mortise alignment, so the sequence is: expose and fix the fibula first, then assess and fix the syndesmosis, then expose and fix the medial malleolus, address the posterior malleolus if indicated, and confirm a perfect mortise on fluoroscopy. The exposures are laid out as the first steps of each side.

Weber B/C ankle ORIF
Weber B/C ankle fracture: the fibula is plated and the medial malleolus fixed with screws to restore the mortise.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, plan and landmarks
  • Supine, bump under the ipsilateral hip for 15-20 degrees internal rotation, knee flexed 30-45 degrees, thigh tourniquet, C-arm from the contralateral side.
  • Systematic pre-operative imaging review: Weber type; the medial injury (malleolar fracture versus deltoid rupture — a medial clear space greater than 4mm suggests the deltoid); syndesmotic indicators (tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm, reduced overlap, medial clear space widening); and posterior malleolar size and displacement (fix if greater than 25 percent of the plafond or greater than 2mm step-off).
  • A CT scan is invaluable for surgical planning when the posterior malleolus is involved — it defines fragment size, rotation, comminution and the incisura.
Step 2Lateral fibular exposure (the exposure)
  • An 8-12cm longitudinal incision centered 1cm posterior to the posterolateral border of the fibula, from the mid-shaft to the lateral malleolar tip.
  • Identify and protect the superficial peroneal nerve (emerges about 10cm proximal to the tip between peroneus tertius and extensor digitorum longus) and the sural nerve (running along the lateral Achilles border) — placing the incision 1cm posterior to the posterolateral border keeps you anterior to the sural nerve.
  • Deepen to the fibular periosteum and elevate it as a single continuous sleeve anteriorly and posteriorly to preserve the fracture biology; expose 4-6cm proximal and 2-3cm distal for the plate and protect the peroneal tendons posteriorly.
  • Clear the fracture of hematoma and debris and characterize the pattern — simple oblique (most Weber B SER) versus comminuted (Weber C or high-energy Weber B) — as this dictates the fixation strategy.
Step 3Fibular reduction — length, rotation, alignment
  • Anatomic fibular reduction determines the entire mortise. Restore all three planes: length (compare with the contralateral ankle — measure from the lateral malleolar tip to the joint line, typically about 1cm; even 2mm of shortening is unacceptable); rotation (the lateral malleolus must point anteriorly toward the first toe — external rotation malreduction is the common error); and sagittal alignment (restore the anteroposterior bow).
  • Reduce with pointed reduction clamps or a Weber clamp, applying longitudinal traction if shortened, and hold provisionally with a small pointed clamp or a 2.0mm K-wire.
  • Confirm on fluoroscopy: AP for length and alignment, mortise for the medial clear space (less than 4mm if the medial structures are intact), and lateral for sagittal alignment.
Step 4Fibular fixation — posterolateral plate
  • Apply a one-third tubular plate (3.5mm system) to the posterolateral fibula (preferred) or the lateral surface. Posterolateral placement is biomechanically optimal — it resists the external rotation forces and avoids the peroneal tendons. Use 6-8 holes for a simple Weber B and 8-10 for a Weber C or comminuted fracture.
  • For a simple oblique fracture: place a lag screw perpendicular to the fracture line through the plate (3.5mm glide hole in the near cortex, 2.5mm thread hole in the far cortex) for interfragmentary compression, then add the plate as a neutralization — a minimum of 3 bicortical screws (6 cortices) proximal and 2 (4 cortices) distal to the fracture.
  • For a comminuted fracture: use a bridge plate — do not compress the comminuted zone; use unicortical or locking screws across it and bicortical screws in intact bone proximal and distal, the plate acting as a buttress to hold length.
  • Confirm the final reduction on AP, mortise and lateral fluoroscopy.
Step 5Syndesmotic assessment — Cotton and Hook tests
  • A critical step after anatomic fibular fixation. Under fluoroscopy on the mortise view, perform the Cotton test (external rotation stress) and the Hook test (lateral stress on the fibula with a bone hook or clamp).
  • The syndesmosis is unstable if the medial clear space widens beyond 4mm or the tibiofibular clear space widens beyond 6mm, or if there is greater than 2mm of lateral fibular translation.
  • Fix the syndesmosis for a Weber C (typically disrupted), a Weber B with a positive stress test, a medial clear space that remains greater than 4mm after anatomic fibular fixation despite an intact medial malleolus, a fracture more than 4.5cm proximal to the plafond, or a posterior malleolar fracture with a PITFL avulsion. When in doubt, fix — a missed syndesmotic injury is worse than over-treatment.
Step 6Syndesmotic fixation (if unstable)
  • Anatomic reduction is paramount — malreduction is worse than no fixation. Reduce the fibula anatomically into the incisura, apply a pointed clamp from the medial tibia to the lateral fibula 2-3cm proximal to the joint line parallel to the joint and slightly anterior (a clamp placed too posterior externally rotates the fibula), and dorsiflex the ankle to neutral to lock the wider anterior talus.
  • Confirm reduction on AP and mortise views — tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm and overlap greater than 6mm (or greater than 42 percent of fibular width) — before fixation.
  • Tricortical screw (preferred): one or two 3.5mm cortical screws 2-3cm proximal to the plafond, inserted 25-30 degrees from lateral to posteromedial, engaging three cortices — it allows micro-motion, has a lower breakage rate, and may not need removal. The suture button (TightRope) is the alternative — flexible, allowing physiologic motion with no routine removal and equivalent outcomes to screws in RCTs. A traditional quadricortical screw is rigid but must be removed at 10-12 weeks to avoid breakage.
Step 7Medial malleolar exposure (the exposure)
  • A 6-8cm curvilinear incision starting 1cm posterior to the medial malleolar tip, extending proximally along the posterior border of the tibia.
  • Identify and protect the greater saphenous vein and saphenous nerve anteriorly (visualize and retract them gently) — placing the incision 1cm posterior to the tip protects them.
  • Deepen to the periosteum and stay anterior to the posterior tibial tendon — the tendon marks the posterior extent of safe dissection and protects the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle in the tarsal tunnel.
  • Expose the fracture and the proximal tibia for screw placement, clear the hematoma, and assess the pattern: transverse or oblique (most common, an avulsion from deltoid tension), vertical shear (a supination-adduction mechanism — unstable), or comminuted. A vertical shear pattern must be planned for an anti-glide plate, as screws alone are insufficient.
Step 8Medial malleolar fixation
  • The medial malleolus is articular — anatomic reduction is mandatory with zero tolerance for step-off. Reduce with pointed clamps and hold with a 1.6-2.0mm K-wire, confirming a flush articular surface on AP, mortise and lateral fluoroscopy.
  • For a transverse or oblique fracture: two 3.5mm or 4.0mm partially threaded cancellous screws from the malleolar tip into the proximal metaphysis, parallel to each other and parallel to the tibial plafond (check the lateral view to confirm the screws do not enter the joint). For an oblique fracture, aim perpendicular to the fracture line for compression.
  • For a vertical shear fracture: a medial anti-glide buttress plate (one-third tubular) on the medial tibial surface — screws alone will fail. For a comminuted or very distal fragment, use a buttress or hook plate.
Step 9Posterior malleolus (if indicated)
  • Fix a posterior malleolar fragment when it involves greater than 25 percent of the plafond, has greater than 2mm of articular step-off, or indicates syndesmotic instability (the PITFL is attached to it). Small fragments often reduce indirectly once the fibula and syndesmosis are fixed — verify on the lateral view.
  • For a minimally displaced fragment, place percutaneous anterior-to-posterior lag screws (2.7mm or 3.5mm) from the anterior tibia 3-4cm proximal to the joint and 1-2cm medial to the tibial crest, aiming posterolaterally — palpate the anterior tibial pulse and stay medial to avoid the anterior neurovascular bundle.
  • For a large displaced fragment, use a posterolateral approach (between the peroneal tendons and Achilles) with direct reduction and a buttress plate, or a posteromedial approach for a Haraguchi Type II fragment with medial extension.
Step 10Deltoid assessment and final mortise confirmation
  • If there is no malleolar fracture but a deltoid rupture is suspected (a bimalleolar equivalent), and the medial clear space remains greater than 4mm despite anatomic fibular and syndesmotic fixation, the deep deltoid is incompetent — repair it directly or with suture anchors to the medial malleolar footprint.
  • Perform a systematic final fluoroscopic check. AP: symmetric joint space, tibiofibular overlap 6-10mm, tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm, medial clear space less than 4mm and equal to the superior clear space within 1mm. Mortise: symmetric medial and lateral clear space (both less than 4mm), congruent joint 360 degrees, no talar shift. Lateral: posterior malleolar step-off less than 2mm if fixed, no talar subluxation, and screws parallel to the plafond.
  • Range the ankle — smooth dorsiflexion and plantarflexion without crepitus or mechanical block — and remove all provisional K-wires.
Step 11Irrigation, hemostasis and layered closure
  • Irrigate every wound with a minimum of 3 liters of pulsatile lavage, remove non-viable fragments and clot, release the tourniquet and achieve meticulous hemostasis with bipolar cautery (avoid monopolar near the nerves).
  • Close in layers without tension — deep fascia with interrupted 2-0 absorbable suture (avoid tight closure), subcutaneous 3-0 absorbable suture to eliminate dead space, and skin with interrupted 3-0 or 4-0 nylon (or staples), removed at 14 days.
  • Apply a well-padded below-knee posterior splint (not a circumferential cast) with the ankle in neutral dorsiflexion, and elevate the limb above the heart.
Five structures at risk — know where each lives

The superficial peroneal nerve emerges about 10cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and crosses the fibular exposure — stay posterior to the posterolateral fibular border. The sural nerve runs along the lateral Achilles border and crosses laterally about 10cm proximal to the tip — the 1cm-posterior incision protects it. The saphenous nerve and vein run anterior to the medial malleolus — identify them early in the medial exposure and retract gently. The posterior tibial neurovascular bundle sits in the tarsal tunnel posterior to the medial malleolus — stay anterior to the posterior tibial tendon. The deep peroneal nerve and anterior tibial vessels run anteriorly between tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus — they are at risk with anterior-to-posterior posterior-malleolar screws, so insert them 3-4cm proximal and 1-2cm medial to the crest and palpate the anterior tibial pulse.

Fibular length is the whole game

Even 2mm of fibular shortening increases tibiotalar contact stress by about 42 percent and shifts load medially, accelerating arthritis. Always compare with the contralateral ankle (measure from the lateral malleolar tip to the joint line), confirm rotation (the tip points to the first toe, not externally rotated), and confirm the medial clear space is less than 4mm on the mortise view after fixation.

Stress-test the syndesmosis every time

Syndesmotic malreduction is common — about 39 percent on postoperative CT, and substantially higher after closed or indirect reduction than after open reduction. Always perform the Cotton and Hook tests after fibular fixation, reduce under direct vision, and consider a postoperative CT versus the contralateral side if the reduction is in doubt.

Fixation choices at a glance

Posterolateral plate (preferred)
Indications
Most Weber B/C fractures, standard approach
Advantages
Biomechanically optimal; resists external rotation; avoids peroneal tendons
Disadvantages
Slightly more demanding plate contouring
Lateral plate (one-third tubular)
Indications
Simple Weber B/C, adequate soft tissue
Advantages
Easy application, low profile
Disadvantages
Peroneal tendon irritation possible; may need removal
Lag screw plus plate (neutralization)
Indications
Simple oblique fracture (SER mechanism)
Advantages
Interfragmentary compression; biomechanically optimal
Disadvantages
Requires a simple pattern; lag screw must be perpendicular to the fracture
Bridge plate (locking/unicortical)
Indications
Comminuted fracture, poor bone, impaired soft tissues
Advantages
Preserves blood supply to the comminuted zone; maintains length
Disadvantages
No direct compression; relies on bridging fixation
Intramedullary fibular rod
Indications
Compromised soft tissues, minimally invasive option
Advantages
Smaller incisions, reduced stripping
Disadvantages
Cannot control rotation well; limited indications
Fibular fixation options
TechniqueIndicationsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Posterolateral plate (preferred)Most Weber B/C fractures, standard approachBiomechanically optimal; resists external rotation; avoids peroneal tendonsSlightly more demanding plate contouring
Lateral plate (one-third tubular)Simple Weber B/C, adequate soft tissueEasy application, low profilePeroneal tendon irritation possible; may need removal
Lag screw plus plate (neutralization)Simple oblique fracture (SER mechanism)Interfragmentary compression; biomechanically optimalRequires a simple pattern; lag screw must be perpendicular to the fracture
Bridge plate (locking/unicortical)Comminuted fracture, poor bone, impaired soft tissuesPreserves blood supply to the comminuted zone; maintains lengthNo direct compression; relies on bridging fixation
Intramedullary fibular rodCompromised soft tissues, minimally invasive optionSmaller incisions, reduced strippingCannot control rotation well; limited indications
Tricortical screw (preferred)
Technique
3.5mm cortical screw stopping in the medial tibial cortex, 2-3cm proximal to the plafond
Advantages
Allows micro-motion; lower breakage; may not need removal
Disadvantages
Slightly less rigid than quadricortical
Suture button (TightRope)
Technique
Flexible suture with buttons on the medial tibia and lateral fibula
Advantages
Allows physiologic motion; no routine removal; equivalent outcomes to screws in RCTs
Disadvantages
More expensive; learning curve
Quadricortical screw (traditional)
Technique
3.5mm cortical screw engaging all four cortices
Advantages
Rigid; strong immediate stability
Disadvantages
Restricts motion; 5-20 percent breakage if not removed; must remove at 10-12 weeks
One versus two screws
Technique
Single screw 2cm proximal versus two at 2cm and 3.5cm
Advantages
Two screws theoretically more stable in rotation
Disadvantages
No clear clinical benefit; one screw is biomechanically sufficient
Syndesmotic fixation options
MethodTechniqueAdvantagesDisadvantages
Tricortical screw (preferred)3.5mm cortical screw stopping in the medial tibial cortex, 2-3cm proximal to the plafondAllows micro-motion; lower breakage; may not need removalSlightly less rigid than quadricortical
Suture button (TightRope)Flexible suture with buttons on the medial tibia and lateral fibulaAllows physiologic motion; no routine removal; equivalent outcomes to screws in RCTsMore expensive; learning curve
Quadricortical screw (traditional)3.5mm cortical screw engaging all four corticesRigid; strong immediate stabilityRestricts motion; 5-20 percent breakage if not removed; must remove at 10-12 weeks
One versus two screwsSingle screw 2cm proximal versus two at 2cm and 3.5cmTwo screws theoretically more stable in rotationNo clear clinical benefit; one screw is biomechanically sufficient
Two parallel screws (standard)
Pattern
Transverse or oblique
Technique
3.5-4.0mm partially threaded cancellous screws parallel to the plafond
Notes
Most common; ensure screws are parallel to avoid joint penetration
Medial anti-glide plate
Pattern
Vertical shear (supination-adduction)
Technique
One-third tubular plate on the medial surface as a buttress
Notes
Essential for vertical fractures; screws alone fail
Divergent screws
Pattern
Vertical fracture pattern
Technique
Screws slightly divergent to capture both fragments
Notes
Improves stability; still parallel to the plafond
Tension band
Pattern
Small fragment or osteoporotic bone
Technique
Two parallel K-wires with a figure-of-8 wire
Notes
Converts distraction to compression; wire irritation common
Hook plate
Pattern
Comminuted or very distal
Technique
Specialized plate with hooks engaging the distal fragment
Notes
For distal fractures where screws cannot gain purchase
Medial malleolar fixation options
OptionPatternTechniqueNotes
Two parallel screws (standard)Transverse or oblique3.5-4.0mm partially threaded cancellous screws parallel to the plafondMost common; ensure screws are parallel to avoid joint penetration
Medial anti-glide plateVertical shear (supination-adduction)One-third tubular plate on the medial surface as a buttressEssential for vertical fractures; screws alone fail
Divergent screwsVertical fracture patternScrews slightly divergent to capture both fragmentsImproves stability; still parallel to the plafond
Tension bandSmall fragment or osteoporotic boneTwo parallel K-wires with a figure-of-8 wireConverts distraction to compression; wire irritation common
Hook plateComminuted or very distalSpecialized plate with hooks engaging the distal fragmentFor distal fractures where screws cannot gain purchase

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation / weight-bearing | Therapy focus | |-------|--------|--------------------------------|---------------| | 1 | 0-2 weeks | Posterior splint, strict non-weight-bearing, strict elevation | Finger and toe active range of motion only; DVT prophylaxis per protocol | | 2 | 2-6 weeks | Removable CAM boot or short-leg cast, still non-weight-bearing | Wound check and suture removal at 14 days; begin ankle range-of-motion out of the boot | | 3 | 6-10 weeks | Weight-bearing as tolerated in the boot if callus forms | Progressive weight-bearing, physiotherapy for ROM and strengthening | | 4 | 10-12 weeks+ | Wean from the boot into a supportive shoe | Remove quadricortical syndesmotic screws if used (tricortical and suture buttons stay) | | 5 | 4-6 months | Normal footwear | Return to impact activity and sport when strength and ROM are adequate | Most patients return to desk work around 6 weeks and to heavy manual work by 4-6 months. Around 75-85 percent report good-to-excellent outcomes when anatomic reduction is achieved; roughly 20-30 percent have some residual pain or stiffness, and post-traumatic arthritis develops in 15-30 percent at 10-20 years despite an anatomic reduction. Monitor with annual radiographs for the first 2-3 years. Complications

Wound complications (5-10%)
Recognition
Dehiscence, skin necrosis (especially medial), superficial infection
Prevention
Delay for the wrinkle sign; minimize stripping; careful skin handling; perioperative antibiotics
Management
Local care and oral antibiotics for minor; debridement, negative-pressure therapy and delayed closure or skin graft for major dehiscence
Malunion with talar shift (5-10%)
Recognition
Persistent medial clear space greater than 4mm; asymmetric joint; progressive pain. Most common error: fibular shortening greater than 2mm
Prevention
Anatomic fibular length (compare contralateral); mortise confirmation of medial clear space less than 4mm; syndesmotic assessment
Management
Early (less than 8 weeks): revision ORIF with lengthening, bone graft, syndesmotic revision. Late: supramalleolar osteotomy or arthrodesis/arthroplasty
Syndesmotic malreduction (5-15%)
Recognition
Widened tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm; external rotation of the fibula in the incisura on CT; chronic pain
Prevention
Systematic Cotton and Hook testing; clamp parallel and slightly anterior; ankle in neutral dorsiflexion; confirm fluoroscopically
Management
Acute: revision fixation within 2-3 weeks. Chronic: reconstruction with a free graft, possible fibular osteotomy, arthroscopic debridement
Post-traumatic arthritis (15-30% at 10+ years)
Recognition
Progressive pain, stiffness, swelling; joint-space narrowing, osteophytes, sclerosis
Prevention
Anatomic reduction (most important); minimize cartilage damage; early mobilization
Management
NSAIDs, bracing, injections; arthroscopy, supramalleolar osteotomy, ankle arthrodesis (gold standard) or total ankle replacement
Hardware prominence/irritation (10-20%)
Recognition
Painful palpable hardware, overlying bursa; syndesmotic screw breakage (5-20% if quadricortical and not removed)
Prevention
Low-profile implants; posterolateral plating; bury screw heads; remove quadricortical screws at 10-12 weeks
Management
Hardware removal after union (12+ months); tricortical screws and suture buttons can stay
Sensory nerve injury (2-5%)
Recognition
Saphenous (medial foot), sural (lateral foot/5th toe) or superficial peroneal (dorsal foot) numbness; painful neuroma
Prevention
Meticulous handling; identify nerves; correct incision placement
Management
Most improve over 6-12 months; desensitization and gabapentin; persistent neuroma — excision with burial
Deep infection (1-3%)
Recognition
Persistent drainage, erythema, fever, raised inflammatory markers
Prevention
Perioperative antibiotics; delay for soft tissue recovery; meticulous hemostasis
Management
Early with stable fixation: irrigation and debridement, polyexchange, 6 weeks suppressive antibiotics. Late or loose: remove after union, debridement, possible free flap
CRPS (2-5%)
Recognition
Disproportionate pain, allodynia, temperature/color and sudomotor changes (Budapest criteria)
Prevention
Minimize trauma; early mobilization; multimodal pain control; Vitamin C 500mg daily
Management
Early diagnosis; physiotherapy (graded motor imagery, desensitization), gabapentinoids, sympathetic blocks; better prognosis if treated early
Venous thromboembolism (1-3%)
Recognition
Calf pain and swelling (DVT); dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, tachycardia (PE)
Prevention
Early mobilization; chemical prophylaxis (LMWH or aspirin 100mg) for high-risk patients; mechanical prophylaxis if bleeding risk
Management
Therapeutic anticoagulation for 3-6 months; IVC filter if anticoagulation is contraindicated
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Wound complications (5-10%)Dehiscence, skin necrosis (especially medial), superficial infectionDelay for the wrinkle sign; minimize stripping; careful skin handling; perioperative antibioticsLocal care and oral antibiotics for minor; debridement, negative-pressure therapy and delayed closure or skin graft for major dehiscence
Malunion with talar shift (5-10%)Persistent medial clear space greater than 4mm; asymmetric joint; progressive pain. Most common error: fibular shortening greater than 2mmAnatomic fibular length (compare contralateral); mortise confirmation of medial clear space less than 4mm; syndesmotic assessmentEarly (less than 8 weeks): revision ORIF with lengthening, bone graft, syndesmotic revision. Late: supramalleolar osteotomy or arthrodesis/arthroplasty
Syndesmotic malreduction (5-15%)Widened tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm; external rotation of the fibula in the incisura on CT; chronic painSystematic Cotton and Hook testing; clamp parallel and slightly anterior; ankle in neutral dorsiflexion; confirm fluoroscopicallyAcute: revision fixation within 2-3 weeks. Chronic: reconstruction with a free graft, possible fibular osteotomy, arthroscopic debridement
Post-traumatic arthritis (15-30% at 10+ years)Progressive pain, stiffness, swelling; joint-space narrowing, osteophytes, sclerosisAnatomic reduction (most important); minimize cartilage damage; early mobilizationNSAIDs, bracing, injections; arthroscopy, supramalleolar osteotomy, ankle arthrodesis (gold standard) or total ankle replacement
Hardware prominence/irritation (10-20%)Painful palpable hardware, overlying bursa; syndesmotic screw breakage (5-20% if quadricortical and not removed)Low-profile implants; posterolateral plating; bury screw heads; remove quadricortical screws at 10-12 weeksHardware removal after union (12+ months); tricortical screws and suture buttons can stay
Sensory nerve injury (2-5%)Saphenous (medial foot), sural (lateral foot/5th toe) or superficial peroneal (dorsal foot) numbness; painful neuromaMeticulous handling; identify nerves; correct incision placementMost improve over 6-12 months; desensitization and gabapentin; persistent neuroma — excision with burial
Deep infection (1-3%)Persistent drainage, erythema, fever, raised inflammatory markersPerioperative antibiotics; delay for soft tissue recovery; meticulous hemostasisEarly with stable fixation: irrigation and debridement, polyexchange, 6 weeks suppressive antibiotics. Late or loose: remove after union, debridement, possible free flap
CRPS (2-5%)Disproportionate pain, allodynia, temperature/color and sudomotor changes (Budapest criteria)Minimize trauma; early mobilization; multimodal pain control; Vitamin C 500mg dailyEarly diagnosis; physiotherapy (graded motor imagery, desensitization), gabapentinoids, sympathetic blocks; better prognosis if treated early
Venous thromboembolism (1-3%)Calf pain and swelling (DVT); dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, tachycardia (PE)Early mobilization; chemical prophylaxis (LMWH or aspirin 100mg) for high-risk patients; mechanical prophylaxis if bleeding riskTherapeutic anticoagulation for 3-6 months; IVC filter if anticoagulation is contraindicated

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

STABLESTABLE — operative indications

S
Syndesmotic injury
Widened tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm or a positive stress test
T
Talar shift
Medial clear space greater than 4mm on weight-bearing or stress views
A
Associated medial injury
A malleolar fracture or deltoid rupture with the lateral fracture
B
Bimalleolar / trimalleolar
Inherently unstable pattern
L
Large posterior malleolus
Greater than 25 percent of the plafond or greater than 2mm step-off
E
External rotation stress positive
The Cotton test demonstrates widening
Mnemonic

FIBULAFIBULA — reduction checklist

F
Fragment identification
Assess the pattern — simple oblique versus comminuted
I
Incisura positioning
Reduce the fibula anatomically in the fibular notch of the tibia
B
Both sides measured
Compare length with the contralateral ankle (tip to joint line, about 1cm)
U
Under fluoroscopy
Confirm medial clear space less than 4mm on the mortise view
L
Lateral malleolus rotation
The tip points anteriorly toward the first toe, not externally rotated
A
Alignment tri-planar
Length, rotation and sagittal bow all anatomic

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 45-year-old presents with an ankle fracture after a twisting injury playing football. X-rays show a Weber B fibular fracture with a transverse medial malleolar fracture and a 6mm medial clear space on the mortise view. How would you assess stability and plan surgical management?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“You have completed ORIF of a trimalleolar ankle fracture with a fibular plate, medial malleolar screws and percutaneous posterior malleolar screws. Your final mortise view shows a medial clear space of 5mm compared with 3mm on the contralateral ankle. What is your systematic approach to identifying and correcting this?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“Describe your technique for syndesmotic reduction and fixation in detail, including how you confirm anatomic reduction and your choice of fixation. What are the common errors and how do you avoid them?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Ankle ORIF — Weber B/C with medial malleolus — exam summary

Indications

  • Talar shift: medial clear space greater than 4mm on weight-bearing or stress views
  • Bimalleolar, trimalleolar, or bimalleolar-equivalent patterns
  • Weber C, or Weber B with a medial or syndesmotic injury
  • Posterior malleolus greater than 25 percent of the plafond or greater than 2mm step-off

Sequence

  • Fix the fibula first to restore length, rotation and alignment
  • Stress-test the syndesmosis (Cotton and Hook tests) and fix if unstable
  • Expose and fix the medial malleolus, then the posterior malleolus if indicated
  • Confirm a perfect mortise: medial clear space less than 4mm, symmetric joint 360 degrees

Fibula

  • Posterolateral one-third tubular plate — biomechanically optimal
  • Lag screw perpendicular to a simple oblique fracture; bridge plate if comminuted
  • Compare length with the contralateral ankle — even 2mm of shortening matters
  • Rotation: the lateral malleolus points to the first toe

Syndesmosis

  • Reduce with a clamp parallel to the joint and slightly anterior, ankle in neutral dorsiflexion
  • Tricortical screw or suture button preferred over quadricortical
  • Confirm tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm and overlap greater than 6mm
  • Malreduction is common (about 39 percent on CT) — reduce under direct vision

Medial malleolus

  • Two 3.5-4.0mm partially threaded screws parallel to the plafond
  • Vertical shear needs a medial anti-glide plate — screws alone fail
  • Stay anterior to the posterior tibial tendon; protect the saphenous nerve and vein
  • Anatomic reduction — zero tolerance for articular step-off

Danger structures

  • Superficial peroneal nerve: stay posterior to the posterolateral fibular border
  • Sural nerve: incision 1cm posterior to the border protects it
  • Saphenous nerve and vein: identify early in the medial exposure
  • Posterior tibial bundle: stay anterior to the PT tendon
  • Anterior bundle: A-P screws 3-4cm proximal and 1-2cm medial to the crest

Complications

  • Wound complications 5-10 percent (highest over the medial malleolus)
  • Malunion with talar shift 5-10 percent — most common error is fibular shortening
  • Syndesmotic malreduction 5-15 percent
  • Post-traumatic arthritis 15-30 percent at 10+ years despite anatomic reduction
  • Hardware prominence 10-20 percent; deep infection 1-3 percent

Aftercare

  • Strict non-weight-bearing and elevation for the first 2 weeks
  • CAM boot at 2 weeks, weight-bearing as tolerated from 6 weeks if callus forms
  • Remove quadricortical syndesmotic screws at 10-12 weeks; tricortical and suture buttons stay
  • Return to impact sport at 4-6 months; monitor radiographs for 2-3 years

Background & Evidence


Ankle mortise anatomy. The tibiotalar joint is a highly congruent modified hinge. The tibial plafond (with its medial malleolus and anterior and posterior lips), the distal fibula forming the lateral wall, and the trapezoidal talus — wider anteriorly by 10-15 percent, which stabilizes the mortise in dorsiflexion — together define the mortise. The critical radiographic measurements are the medial clear space (normal less than 4mm, equal to the superior clear space within 1mm), the tibiofibular clear space (normal less than 6mm on the AP view), the tibiofibular overlap (greater than 6mm, or greater than 42 percent of fibular width), and the talocrural angle (83 plus or minus 4 degrees on the mortise view). Syndesmotic complex. Four components resist external rotation and lateral translation: the AITFL (from the Chaput tubercle to the Wagstaffe tubercle), the stronger PITFL (whose avulsion produces the Volkmann fragment), the distal interosseous tibiofibular ligament, and the interosseous membrane (disrupted extensively in a high Maisonneuve injury). The syndesmosis widens 1-2mm in dorsiflexion; disruption increases external rotation and lateral talar shift. Deltoid ligament. The superficial layer (tibiospring, tibionavicular, tibiocalcaneal, superficial tibiotalar) resists valgus; the deep layer (deep posterior tibiotalar, from the posterior colliculus) resists external rotation and lateral talar shift and is the most critical for mortise stability. A deep deltoid rupture allows lateral talar shift even with an intact superficial layer — the basis of the bimalleolar-equivalent injury. Fibular biomechanics. The fibula is a lateral buttress, maintains syndesmotic width, and bears 10-15 percent of the axial load. Length restoration is paramount — 2mm of shortening increases tibiotalar contact stress by about 42 percent — and rotation and sagittal alignment must both be restored. The blood supply comes from the peroneal artery (preserve the periosteal sleeve); the medial malleolus is supplied by branches of the posterior and anterior tibial arteries. Classification. The Weber system levels the fibular fracture against the syndesmosis and predicts stability; the Lauge-Hansen system describes the mechanism (foot position then deforming force) and the staged injury pattern, with supination-external rotation (SER) the most common mechanism at 40-75 percent.

A
Fracture level
Below the syndesmosis (transverse)
Typical mechanism
Supination-adduction (inversion)
Syndesmosis
Intact — usually stable
Management
Conservative if isolated; ORIF if there is a medial injury or instability
B
Fracture level
At the syndesmosis (spiral/oblique)
Typical mechanism
Supination-external rotation (most common, 40-75%)
Syndesmosis
Variable — may be partially torn
Management
ORIF if displaced, if there is a medial injury, or if there is talar shift
C
Fracture level
Above the syndesmosis (proximal fibula)
Typical mechanism
Pronation-external rotation (high energy)
Syndesmosis
Disrupted — typically unstable
Management
ORIF with syndesmotic fixation almost always required
Weber classification
Weber typeFracture levelTypical mechanismSyndesmosisManagement
ABelow the syndesmosis (transverse)Supination-adduction (inversion)Intact — usually stableConservative if isolated; ORIF if there is a medial injury or instability
BAt the syndesmosis (spiral/oblique)Supination-external rotation (most common, 40-75%)Variable — may be partially tornORIF if displaced, if there is a medial injury, or if there is talar shift
CAbove the syndesmosis (proximal fibula)Pronation-external rotation (high energy)Disrupted — typically unstableORIF with syndesmotic fixation almost always required
SER (40-75%)
Stage I
AITFL disruption or anterior tibial tubercle avulsion
Stage II
Spiral oblique distal fibula fracture (Weber B)
Stage III
PITFL rupture or posterior malleolar fracture
Stage IV
Transverse medial malleolus fracture or deltoid rupture
SA (10-20%)
Stage I
Transverse lateral malleolus (Weber A) or lateral ligament tear
Stage II
Vertical shear medial malleolus fracture
Stage III
—
Stage IV
—
PER (7-20%)
Stage I
Transverse medial malleolus or deltoid rupture
Stage II
AITFL disruption
Stage III
High fibula fracture above the syndesmosis (Weber C)
Stage IV
PITFL rupture or posterior malleolar avulsion
PA (5-20%)
Stage I
Transverse medial malleolus or deltoid rupture
Stage II
AITFL and interosseous membrane disruption
Stage III
Transverse/oblique fibula at or above the plafond with comminution
Stage IV
PITFL rupture or posterior malleolar fracture
Lauge-Hansen classification
Pattern (frequency)Stage IStage IIStage IIIStage IV
SER (40-75%)AITFL disruption or anterior tibial tubercle avulsionSpiral oblique distal fibula fracture (Weber B)PITFL rupture or posterior malleolar fractureTransverse medial malleolus fracture or deltoid rupture
SA (10-20%)Transverse lateral malleolus (Weber A) or lateral ligament tearVertical shear medial malleolus fracture——
PER (7-20%)Transverse medial malleolus or deltoid ruptureAITFL disruptionHigh fibula fracture above the syndesmosis (Weber C)PITFL rupture or posterior malleolar avulsion
PA (5-20%)Transverse medial malleolus or deltoid ruptureAITFL and interosseous membrane disruptionTransverse/oblique fibula at or above the plafond with comminutionPITFL rupture or posterior malleolar fracture
Transverse/oblique
Mechanism
Avulsion from deltoid tension (SER, PER)
Fixation
Two 3.5-4.0mm partially threaded screws perpendicular to the fracture
Pearl
Most common; screws parallel to the plafond
Vertical shear
Mechanism
Axial load with talar impaction (supination-adduction)
Fixation
Medial anti-glide buttress plate, or lag screws plus a separate anti-glide screw
Pearl
Unstable — screws alone are insufficient; a plate is required
Comminuted
Mechanism
High energy or osteoporotic bone
Fixation
Medial buttress plate with multiple screws proximal and distal
Pearl
Bridge-plate technique for severe comminution
Medial malleolar fracture patterns
PatternMechanismFixationPearl
Transverse/obliqueAvulsion from deltoid tension (SER, PER)Two 3.5-4.0mm partially threaded screws perpendicular to the fractureMost common; screws parallel to the plafond
Vertical shearAxial load with talar impaction (supination-adduction)Medial anti-glide buttress plate, or lag screws plus a separate anti-glide screwUnstable — screws alone are insufficient; a plate is required
ComminutedHigh energy or osteoporotic boneMedial buttress plate with multiple screws proximal and distalBridge-plate technique for severe comminution

I
Fragment
Posterolateral triangular fragment (PITFL attached)
Typical size
Variable — measure the percent of plafond on the lateral view
Fixation
A-P lag screws, or a posterolateral plate if large
II
Fragment
Medial extension — a larger fragment extending medially
Typical size
Typically greater than 25 percent of the plafond
Fixation
Posterolateral or posteromedial plate required
III
Fragment
Small shell fragment of the posterior tibial lip
Typical size
Usually less than 10 percent of the plafond
Fixation
Often reduces indirectly; A-P screws if needed
Haraguchi classification of the posterior malleolus
TypeFragmentTypical sizeFixation
IPosterolateral triangular fragment (PITFL attached)Variable — measure the percent of plafond on the lateral viewA-P lag screws, or a posterolateral plate if large
IIMedial extension — a larger fragment extending mediallyTypically greater than 25 percent of the plafondPosterolateral or posteromedial plate required
IIISmall shell fragment of the posterior tibial lipUsually less than 10 percent of the plafondOften reduces indirectly; A-P screws if needed
The fixation threshold for a posterior malleolar fragment is greater than 25 percent of the plafond on the lateral view, or greater than 2mm of articular step-off. Key evidence. The classic cadaveric work of Ramsey and Hamilton (1976) showed that as little as 1mm of lateral talar shift markedly reduces tibiotalar contact area, concentrating load and predisposing to arthritis — the basis for the central technical goal of restoring fibular length and rotation. Residual talar shift greater than 1mm is the strongest radiographic predictor of poor outcome. The long-term follow-up of operatively treated ankle fractures (Stufkens, 2011) confirms good-to-excellent outcomes in the majority with anatomic reduction, but post-traumatic arthritis in a substantial minority even so. Syndesmotic malreduction (Sagi, 2012) is the single strongest surgeon-controllable predictor of poor outcome, and a prospective RCT (Laflamme, 2015) showed a suture button had zero implant failure versus 36 percent with a quadricortical screw, with better functional scores. Global guidelines and practice | Source / society | Region | Relevance to ankle ORIF | | --- | --- | --- | | AO Foundation principles | Global | Anatomic reduction of fibular length and rotation; lag screw plus neutralization for simple patterns; bridge plating for comminution | | AAOS / OTA | US | Emphasize direct syndesmotic reduction and CT confirmation when malreduction is suspected | | BOA / BOAST (open fractures) | UK | Combined ortho-plastic care, early IV antibiotics and definitive soft-tissue cover for open ankle fractures | | AOANJRR / NJR (ankle arthroplasty) | Australia / UK | Inform the salvage pathway: total ankle replacement is an option for end-stage post-traumatic arthritis, with registry-tracked revision rates | Antibiotic prophylaxis (global principle). A first-generation cephalosporin (for example cefazolin) given within 60 minutes of incision is standard for closed-fracture ORIF, with re-dosing for prolonged procedures and a glycopeptide or clindamycin for beta-lactam allergy. Open fractures require urgent IV antibiotics per local open-fracture protocols (BOAST / EAST), with added Gram-negative and anaerobic cover for heavily contaminated wounds. Specific national drug-funding schemes are intentionally omitted as they are not exam-relevant and vary by country.

References


Evidence

The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up

Level II
Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective bilateral-CT study of 68 operatively treated syndesmotic injuries at a minimum 2-year follow-up
  • 27 of 68 (39%) syndesmoses were malreduced (rotational or translational) compared with the uninjured contralateral ankle
  • Closed (indirect) reduction was malreduced in 44% of cases versus only 15% after open (direct) reduction
  • Malreduced patients had significantly worse SMFA and Olerud-Molander functional scores (P less than 0.05)
Clinical implication: Syndesmotic malreduction is common and is the single strongest surgeon-controllable predictor of poor outcome. Favour direct open visualisation of the incisura during reduction, and consider postoperative CT versus the contralateral side, revising fixation if malreduced.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 22357084)
Evidence

Prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture

Level I
Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bedard L, van den Bekerom MPJ, Glazebrook M, Pelet S • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Double-blind RCT of 70 patients: suture-button (TightRope, n=34) versus quadricortical 3.5mm screw (n=36)
  • Dynamic fixation gave higher Olerud-Molander scores at 12 months (93.3 vs 87.6, P=0.046)
  • Implant failure occurred in 36.1% of the screw group versus 0% of the suture-button group
  • Loss of reduction seen in 4 screw patients (11.1%) versus 0 suture-button patients
Clinical implication: Dynamic suture-button fixation provides reliable syndesmotic stabilisation with markedly lower implant failure, loss of reduction and reoperation than rigid screws, and requires no routine removal. It is a strong default where the construct is available.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25260059)
Evidence

No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation

Level II
Wikeroy AKB, Hoiness PR, Andreassen GS, Hellund JC, Madsen JE • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term (8.4-year) follow-up of an RCT: one quadricortical screw (n=23) versus two tricortical screws (n=25)
  • No significant difference in Olerud-Molander, OTA score, or osteoarthritis between fixation constructs
  • Residual tibiofibular width difference of 1.5mm or more between ankles trended toward worse function (P=0.056)
  • A retained posterior malleolar fragment was an important negative prognostic factor
Clinical implication: Cortical-count of a syndesmotic screw matters less than anatomic reduction. Quality of reduction (within 1.5mm of the contralateral side) drives outcome far more than whether the screw is tri- or quadricortical.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 20035173)
Evidence

Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability

Level IV
Gardner MJ, Brodsky A, Briggs SM, Nielson JH, Lorich DG • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Cadaveric PER-pattern model with random posterior-malleolar versus syndesmotic-screw fixation
  • Posterior malleolar fixation restored stiffness to 70% of the intact specimen
  • Syndesmotic screw fixation alone restored only 40% of intact stiffness
  • In the clinical cohort the PITFL remained intact and attached to the posterior fragment (no complete tears)
Clinical implication: Because the PITFL typically stays attached to the posterior malleolus, directly fixing a significant posterior fragment can restore syndesmotic stability more effectively than a transsyndesmotic screw and may obviate separate syndesmotic fixation in selected cases.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16467626)
Evidence

Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures

Level IV
Bartonicek J, Rammelt S, Kostlivy K, Vanecek V, Klika D, Tresl I • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2015)
Key Findings:
  • CT-based analysis (with 3D reconstruction) of 141 Weber B/C ankle fractures with a posterior fragment
  • Defined a four-type CT classification by fragment size, shape, incisura involvement and medial malleolar extension
  • Plain radiographs cannot reliably assess fragment shape, incisura involvement, or medial extension
  • Classification informs the need for surgery and the optimal posterior approach
Clinical implication: CT is required to characterise the posterior malleolus accurately; fragment morphology (incisura and medial involvement) — not just the lateral-view percentage — dictates approach and fixation strategy. This complements the simpler Haraguchi system.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25708027)
Evidence

Long-term outcome after 1822 operatively treated ankle fractures: a systematic review

Level III
Stufkens SAS, van den Bekerom MPJ, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Hintermann B, van Dijk CN • Injury (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 1822 operatively treated ankle fractures with long-term follow-up
  • Good-to-excellent outcomes are achievable in the majority when anatomic reduction is obtained
  • Post-traumatic osteoarthritis develops in a substantial minority even after anatomic reduction
  • Quality of articular and mortise reduction is the dominant determinant of long-term function
Clinical implication: Anatomic restoration of the mortise is the principal modifiable predictor of long-term outcome, but patients should be counselled that post-traumatic arthritis can still develop despite a technically perfect reduction.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 20444447)
Evidence

Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift

Ramsey PL, Hamilton W • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (1976)

Classic cadaveric study demonstrating that as little as 1mm of lateral talar shift markedly reduces tibiotalar contact area (about 42 percent), concentrating load and predisposing to arthritis — the biomechanical foundation for restoring fibular length and rotation.

Evidence

Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle

Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, Kato F • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2006)

Three-type CT classification of the posterior malleolus (posterolateral-oblique, medial-extension, small-shell) — the simpler Haraguchi system referenced in the classification table.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
24
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
24
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Approach to the Fibula (Lateral, Peroneal-Protecting)Medial Approach to Ankle (Medial Malleolus)
Browse all procedures