Boutonnière Deformity — Reconstruction

Hand & WristAdvancedCore Procedure

Boutonnière Deformity — Reconstruction

Surgical technique guide for reconstruction of chronic boutonnière deformity — central-slip repair and reconstruction, lateral-band relocation, terminal-tendon tenotomy, and post-operative rehabilitation

High-yield overview

Central-slip repair, lateral-band relocation, terminal tenotomy, and extensor rebalancing | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Decision Points and Exam Traps
Closed Splinting Failure — The DIP Must Be Free

The trap: Placing the finger in a single straight splint that blocks BOTH the PIP and DIP joints — this prevents the lateral bands from being drawn dorsally during DIP flexion and fails to correct the deformity.

The fix: Use a PIP extension splint (Stack, Goldfinger, or custom thermoplastic) that holds the PIP in full extension but leaves the DIP free to flex and extend. The patient must actively flex the DIP against resistance (or passively stretch it) to pull the lateral bands dorsally over the PIP joint. The DIP is the engine of reduction in closed treatment.

PIP Fixed Contracture — Do Not Operate

The pathology: If the PIP joint cannot be passively extended to 0 degrees, the volar plate and accessory collateral ligaments have contracted. Any active extensor reconstruction will fail because the central slip cannot generate enough force to overcome the fixed flexion.

The fix: Serial extension casting or dynamic PIP extension splinting until passive extension is at least 0 degrees. This typically takes 4-8 weeks. Only then is the patient a candidate for central-slip reconstruction. Operating through a fixed contracture produces a stiff, flexed finger.

Swan-Neck Conversion — Overcorrection

Mechanism: Over-tensioning the central slip reconstruction or over-dorsalising the lateral bands (particularly in a Matev-type transfer) can convert the deformity from boutonnière to swan-neck (PIP hyperextension, DIP flexion).

Prevention: Tension the repair in about 20 degrees of PIP flexion, not in full extension. The lateral bands should lie dorsal to the PIP axis but not so far dorsally that they become extensors. Check full passive PIP flexion before closing to ensure the repair does not tether flexion.

Traumatic vs Rheumatoid — Different Treatments

Traumatic pattern: A discrete central-slip rupture (avulsion from dorsal base of middle phalanx, laceration, or closed rupture). Repairable directly in most acute cases. Surgery aims to restore anatomy.

Rheumatoid pattern: Synovitis causes gradual attenuation of the central slip and dorsal capsule without a clean rupture. The lateral bands are displaced volarly by synovial hypertrophy. Direct repair of the attenuated tissue is futile. Treatment is synovectomy plus lateral-band relocation (Matev-type). Managing the synovitis (DMARDs, synovectomy) takes priority.

DIP Hyperextension — Don't Ignore It

Why it matters: The DIP hyperextension component of the boutonnière is cosmetically and functionally disabling — the fingertip cannot flex to grasp small objects. Ignoring it in the reconstruction plan leaves the patient with an incomplete correction.

Options: (1) If the DIP hyperextension is passively correctable and mild (less than 20 degrees), it often resolves spontaneously once the PIP is extended and the lateral bands relocate dorsally. (2) For fixed or severe hyperextension, add a Fowler terminal tenotomy (divide the terminal tendon just distal to the DIP joint). (3) For ORL tightness causing the DIP extension, consider Littler ORL reconstruction.

Hand Therapy Is the Surgery — Rehab Defines Outcome

The principle: In boutonnière reconstruction, the surgical repair is only as good as the post-operative rehabilitation. A technically perfect central-slip repair that is immobilised incorrectly or too briefly will stretch out and recur.

The programme: 6 weeks of continuous PIP extension splinting (removed only for supervised active DIP exercises), followed by 4-6 weeks of night splinting and progressive active PIP flexion. The patient must understand this commitment before surgery. Loss to therapy follow-up is a relative contraindication to complex reconstruction.

Mnemonic

B.O.U.T.O.N.N.I.E.R.EBOUTONNIERE — Systematic Assessment and Treatment

Mnemonic

C.E.N.T.R.A.LCENTRAL — Central-Slip Reconstruction Principles

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Open Zone III extensor tendon injury with loss of active PIP extension — primary repair within 24 hours
  • Bony avulsion of central slip with greater than 2 mm fragment displacement and articular incongruity — ORIF or reattachment
  • Failed non-operative management — persistent or recurrent deformity after 6-8 weeks of compliant full-time PIP extension splinting
  • Chronic boutonnière (greater than 12 weeks) with supple PIP (passive extension to 0 degrees) and functional disability

Relative Indications

  • Patient dissatisfaction with functional or cosmetic appearance after closed treatment
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (rheumatoid, psoriatic) with persistent deformity despite optimal medical management
  • Recurrent deformity after previous surgical reconstruction
  • Concomitant nerve or vascular injury requiring exploration

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Fixed PIP flexion contracture (passive extension cannot reach 0 degrees) — must be corrected first
  • Active infection, poorly controlled wound
  • Non-compliant patient or inability to participate in structured hand therapy (relative absolute)

Relative:

  • Mild deformity (less than 30 degrees PIP flexion) with minimal functional limitation — try closed treatment
  • Elderly or low-demand patient with comfortable, functional range — may choose observation
  • Severe rheumatoid synovitis not medically optimised — treat the synovitis first

Evidence for Non-Operative Treatment

PIP Extension Splinting for Acute Closed Injuries

  • Full-time PIP extension splinting for 6 consecutive weeks, with the DIP left completely free, is the standard of care for acute closed central-slip injuries
  • The splint is removed only for wound care and supervised active DIP flexion exercises
  • The mechanism of action is mechanical: DIP flexion pulls the lateral bands dorsally across the PIP joint, stretching the ORL and allowing the extensor mechanism to heal with the central slip in correct anatomical position
  • Reported success rates in compliant patients: 80-90% excellent/good outcomes for acute (less than 2 week) closed injuries treated with full-time splinting (Evans, Green)

Key Evidence (Closed Treatment)

  • Evans (2006) — detailed the "splint the PIP, mobilise the DIP" protocol; approximately 90% good results in acute closed boutonnière when compliance is assured
  • Coons and Green (2001) — retrospective series confirming that early full-time PIP extension splinting with DIP exercises is the most reliable closed treatment; outcomes deteriorate if initiation of splinting is delayed beyond 2 weeks

Evidence for Surgery

Timing and Case Selection

  • For established chronic boutonnière (greater than 12 weeks) with failed closed treatment, multiple surgical options exist but the evidence base is largely Level IV (case series) with no high-quality comparative trials
  • The key principle consistent across all series: the outcome of reconstruction is determined more by patient selection and post-operative rehabilitation than by the specific surgical technique chosen
  • A supple PIP with passive extension to 0 degrees is the single most important predictor of a successful outcome

Reconstructive Options — Advantages and Limitations


Key Evidence

Evidence

Extensor tendon: anatomy, injury, and reconstruction

Level V
Rockwell WB, Butler PN, Byrne BA
Clinical implication: One of the most frequently cited references for the non-operative management of acute closed boutonnière deformity; reinforced the critical role of the DIP being free during splinting.
Source: Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106(7):1592-1603
Evidence

Results of the Matev operation for correction of Boutonnière deformity

Level IV
Gama C
Clinical implication: The Matev lateral-band transfer remains a workhorse procedure for chronic boutonnière when the central slip is irreparable and the PIP is supple.
Source: Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;64(3):319-324
Evidence

Correction of the severe nonrheumatoid chronic boutonnière deformity with a modified Matev procedure

Level IV
Terrill RQ, Groves RJ
Clinical implication: A refined version of the classic Matev technique for severe nonrheumatoid boutonnière that can guide contemporary reconstruction planning.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1992;17(5):874-880
Evidence

Anatomic repair of the central slip with anchor suture augmentation for treatment of established boutonnière deformity

Level IV
Lee JK, Lee S, Kim M, Jo S
Clinical implication: Suture anchor fixation provides a biomechanically stronger and technically simpler alternative to transosseous tunnels for central-slip reattachment.
Source: Clin Orthop Surg 2021;13(2):243-251
Evidence

Managing swan neck and boutonnière deformities

Level V
Elzinga K, Chung KC
Clinical implication: A useful modern reference that integrates both deformities into a single decision framework, reinforcing the importance of aetiology-specific treatment.
Source: Clin Plast Surg 2019;46(3):329-337

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 34-year-old electrician presents 4 weeks after a closed jam injury to his right ring finger PIP joint while playing cricket. He has a boutonnière posture of the finger. The PIP can be passively extended to 0 degrees and Elson test is positive. How do you manage him?

Practical approach
This is an acute (less than 6 weeks) closed central-slip disruption with a fully supple PIP — the ideal candidate for closed non-operative management. I would treat him with full-time PIP extension splinting for 6 continuous weeks with the DIP joint left completely free to flex.\n\n**Splinting protocol**: I would fit a custom thermoplastic PIP extension splint (or a Stack-type splint) that holds the PIP in full extension. The DIP must be free. The patient must flex the DIP actively 10-15 times every waking hour — each DIP flexion pulls the lateral bands dorsally across the PIP joint and stretches the oblique retinacular ligament, which is the mechanism by which the deformity corrects.\n\n**Monitoring**: I would review him at 2 weeks to check skin condition and compliance, then at 6 weeks to remove the splint and assess active PIP extension. At 6 weeks, if he has active PIP extension to within 10 degrees of full extension, I would transition to night splinting for another 4 weeks and begin gentle active PIP flexion. If the deformity persists or recurs after 6 weeks of compliant splinting, I would consider central-slip reconstruction.\n\n**Return to work**: As an electrician, he cannot return to work until the splinting phase is complete (6 weeks) and then gradually over the next 4-6 weeks with light duties. Heavy manual work is typically at 12-16 weeks. I would counsel him on this timeline at the first visit to set realistic occupational expectations.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 58-year-old woman with well-controlled seropositive rheumatoid arthritis has a chronic boutonnière deformity of her right long finger. The PIP can be passively extended to 0 degrees. There is 25 degrees of DIP hyperextension that is fixed in this position. Radiographs show preserved PIP joint space. How would you reconstruct this finger?

Practical approach
This is a classic rheumatoid boutonnière pattern — synovitis has attenuated the central slip without a discrete rupture, and the lateral bands are displaced volarly. The preserved joint space on radiographs and controlled synovitis are favourable. The fixed DIP hyperextension (25 degrees) suggests the oblique retinacular ligament is tight.\n\n**Pre-operative**: I would confirm that her rheumatoid disease is medically optimised (rheumatologist review, stable DMARD regimen, no active synovitis in the PIP joint). I would re-examine the PIP to confirm passive extension to 0 degrees — if there is any residual contracture, I would treat it with serial extension casting or dynamic splinting first.\n\n**Operative plan**: Through a dorsal curvilinear approach over the PIP joint:\n1. **Dorsal synovectomy** first — excise the hypertrophic synovium to decompress the joint and reduce the inflammatory load\n2. **Do NOT attempt direct central-slip repair** — in rheumatoid disease the attenuated central-slip tissue does not hold sutures. Instead, I will perform a lateral-band relocation (Matev-type reconstruction)\n3. **Matev lateral-band transfer**: I would identify both lateral bands, select the ulnar band for transfer (more robust), transect it at the proximal phalanx level, and transfer the proximal end to a transosseous tunnel at the dorsal base of the middle phalanx. I would tension the transfer with the PIP in 20 degrees of flexion\n4. **Address the DIP hyperextension**: Because the 25 degrees of DIP hyperextension is fixed (not passively correctable), the DIP will not resolve with PIP correction alone. I would add a **Fowler terminal tenotomy** — divide the terminal tendon 3-5 mm distal to the DIP joint through the same incision or percutaneously. This will release the ORL tether and allow the DIP to flex\n5. **Post-operative**: PIP extension splint with DIP free for 6 weeks; then transition to night splinting and gentle active flexion\n\n**Outcome expectation**: I would counsel her that results in rheumatoid disease are less predictable than traumatic cases — approximately 60-70% chance of satisfactory correction. She should expect some residual PIP stiffness (10-20 degrees flexion loss) and a permanent 10-15 degree DIP extension lag from the Fowler tenotomy. The tenotomy trade-off is acceptable: she gains the ability to flex her fingertip to grasp small objects, which is functionally more important than full DIP extension.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 22-year-old university student underwent a Matev lateral-band transfer for a chronic boutonnière deformity of the left index finger 4 months ago. She has been compliant with therapy. The PIP is now 15 degrees into hyperextension (swan-neck posture) with the DIP resting in 20 degrees of flexion. She is distressed about the appearance and has difficulty picking up small objects. How do you manage this complication?

Practical approach
This is a swan-neck deformity resulting from overcorrection of the boutonnière — the lateral-band transfer was tensioned too tightly or the transferred band has been positioned too far dorsally, converting the PIP from flexion to hyperextension.\n\n**Assessment**: First, I would determine whether the deformity is passively correctable (supple) or fixed. I would examine: (1) passive PIP hyperextension — can it be reduced to neutral? (2) DIP passive flexion — is the terminal tendon tight? (3) active flexion arc of both PIP and DIP — what is the total active motion? (4) stability of the PIP in the lateral plane — are the collateral ligaments intact? (5) X-rays to exclude bony changes, joint destruction, or arthritis from the surgery.\n\n**Initial management (non-operative)**: If the deformity is mild (less than 20 degrees of PIP hyperextension) and the PIP is supple, I would start with a hand-therapy programme: (1) PIP flexion blocking exercises — strengthen the FDS to actively resist hyperextension, (2) DIP flexion stretching to overcome any terminal tendon tightness, (3) a PIP flexion-assist splint or figure-of-eight splint that prevents full PIP extension, (4) buddy-taping to the adjacent index PIP to encourage flexion.\n\n**Surgical options if non-operative management fails**:\n1. **If the deformity is fixed** (less than 30 degrees passive PIP flexion): Check-rein ligament release (volar PIP capsulotomy) plus terminal-tendon tenolysis\n2. **If the deformity is supple** (passive flexion greater than 70 degrees): The least invasive option is a **Fowler tenotomy** of the terminal tendon — this converts the DIP from flexion back to a more extended posture and reduces the hyperextension force on the PIP via the lateral bands. Alternatively, the lateral-band transfer can be taken down and re-tensioned more loosely\n3. **If all else fails or the patient is unwilling to accept additional recovery time**: The easiest salvage is a **PIP arthrodesis** in 20 degrees of flexion — a stable, pain-free finger with excellent function for grasp and pinch\n\n**Management in this patient**: Given she is 4 months post-operative and the deformity is moderate (15 degrees hyperextension, supple), I would begin with 4-6 weeks of hand therapy (FDS strengthening, flexion splinting). If there is no improvement, I would offer a Fowler tenotomy under local anaesthetic as a 15-minute procedure, which would correct the DIP flexion component and indirectly reduce the PIP hyperextension. I would counsel her that tenotomy creates a permanent DIP extension lag of 10-15 degrees (she already has 20 degrees of DIP flexion, so the lag will change from a flexed to a neutral or slightly lagging posture — functionally better).
Exam day cheat sheet
Boutonnière Deformity — Reconstruction: Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Surgical treatment of the boutonniere deformity in rheumatoid arthritis

Level IV
Nalebuff EA, Millender LH
Clinical implication: Rheumatoid boutonnière requires a fundamentally different approach to traumatic boutonnière.
Source: Orthop Clin North Am 1975;6(3):753-63
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.