Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Charcot Neuroarthropathy — Foot Reconstruction

Operative SurgeryFoot & Ankle
Foot & AnkleAdvancedCore Procedure

Charcot Neuroarthropathy — Foot Reconstruction

Surgical reconstruction of the Charcot (neuropathic) foot — Eichenholtz staging, superconstruct arthrodesis principles, midfoot and hindfoot deformity correction, exostectomy, fixation strategies, and total-contact casting for the insensate diabetic foot

Procedure console
35 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Deformity correction and arthrodesis of the Charcot foot using superconstruct principles · advanced

Eichenholtz II–IIIWhen to operate
SuperconstructFixation principle
Sanders Type 2Most common pattern
2–5 hrDuration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Eichenholtz staging determines surgical timing: Stage I (fragmentation, active inflammation) is a relative contraindication to reconstructive arthrodesis — operate during Stage II-III (coalescence and consolidation) when the inflammatory process has settled and bone has some healing capacity. Stage 0 (clinical inflammation with normal radiographs) requires immobilisation and offloading, not surgery, unless there is acute instability or impending ulceration over a displaced fragment.
  • Superconstruct principles (Sammarco and Conti): (1) extend the arthrodesis beyond the zone of Charcot injury to include uninvolved joints, (2) use the strongest possible fixation — intramedullary beams, large-diameter screws, plantar plates, bolts, (3) accept prolonged immobilisation with non-weight-bearing for 8 to 12 weeks minimum in most cases, (4) resect enough bone to fully correct the deformity and eliminate the plantar prominence. These principles are essential because Charcot bone is osteopenic, mechanically poor, and biologically unforgiving.
  • The rocker-bottom deformity from midfoot (Lisfranc and tarsometatarsal) Charcot collapse creates a plantar bony prominence that ulcerates in the insensate foot — this is the single most common indication for surgery. A plantar ulcer over a bony prominence will not heal with antibiotics or dressings alone while the underlying mechanical cause persists; either exostectomy (simple prominence resection) or formal arthrodesis with deformity correction is required.
  • Intramedullary beaming (rods or nails placed retrograde through the calcaneus and up the tibia) provides axial load-sharing fixation that is biomechanically stronger than plate-and-screw constructs alone — it is the preferred strategy for hindfoot and ankle Charcot reconstructions where bone quality is severely compromised.
Clinical Pearls
  • “
    The most common Charcot pattern is Sanders Type 2 — tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joint involvement producing the classic rocker-bottom midfoot deformity. Know the five Sanders patterns for the viva: forefoot, TMT, midtarsal, hindfoot, and calcaneus.
  • “
    Total-contact casting (TCC) is the gold-standard non-operative management for acute Charcot (Eichenholtz Stage 0 to I) and for offloading plantar ulcers. Surgery is reserved for deformity that cannot be accommodated in a brace or cast, or for ulcers that fail to heal despite adequate offloading.
  • “
    Surgery in active Charcot (Eichenholtz Stage I) carries catastrophic risk of worsening fragmentation, nonunion, and deep infection. Wait until the foot cools clinically and radiographs show coalescence or consolidation (Stage II to III) before elective reconstruction. The exception is acute Charcot with instability or fracture-dislocation threatening the skin, which may need urgent external fixation.
  • “
    Amputation (below-knee or above-knee) remains the final common pathway for failed reconstruction, uncontrollable infection, or a non-salvageable foot. Up to a quarter of patients with Charcot foot may eventually require some level of amputation — this must be part of the consent discussion.

When & Why


Timing is everything. The Eichenholtz stage sets the clock for surgery. Acute Charcot (Stage 0 to I) is a medical, not a surgical, problem — immobilise and offload in a total-contact cast until the foot cools. Elective reconstructive arthrodesis is deferred to Stage II to III (coalescence and consolidation), when the inflammatory cascade has settled and the bone has regained enough biology to hold fixation and fuse. Operating on a hot, actively fragmenting Stage I foot converts a manageable collapse into an infected nonunion with hardware failure. Absolute indications for reconstruction - Unbraceable deformity — a fixed rocker-bottom or hindfoot deformity that cannot be accommodated in a CROW boot, custom AFO, or total-contact cast.

  • Recurrent or non-healing plantar ulcer over a bony prominence despite adequate offloading (at least 3 months of TCC or a CROW boot).
  • Deep infection with osteomyelitis in the Charcot foot — debridement with or without concurrent stabilisation.
  • Acute instability or fracture-dislocation threatening the soft tissues — urgent external fixation even in Eichenholtz Stage I. Relative indications: a patient declining prolonged offloading, recurrent ulceration despite brace compliance, progressive deformity on serial radiographs despite immobilisation, or inability to wear any footwear. Contraindications (elective reconstruction) - Absolute: Eichenholtz Stage I (active fragmentation) — catastrophic fixation failure and worsening deformity; uncontrolled infection with systemic sepsis; critical ischaemia (ABI less than 0.45 or absolute toe pressure less than 30 mmHg) without planned revascularisation.
  • Relative: Eichenholtz Stage 0 with no instability (treat non-operatively first); HbA1c greater than 10 percent; active smoking; end-stage renal disease on dialysis; limited or no ambulatory potential (amputation may be more appropriate). Which operation, and why. Every reconstruction begins from the same logic — remove the plantar prominence and realign the foot to plantigrade. The choice is how much you fuse:
Exostectomy

Resection of the plantar bony prominence alone, without arthrodesis. Quick and low-morbidity, it preserves joint mobility — for an isolated prominence with a non-healing ulcer in a braceable foot. It recurs in 30 to 50 percent at 2 to 3 years if the underlying deformity is left uncorrected.

Midfoot arthrodesis

The definitive procedure for an unbraceable Sanders Type 2 rocker-bottom foot: correct the deformity, eliminate the plantar prominence, and build a stable plantigrade foot with plates, large screws and a medial column bolt, extended beyond the Charcot zone.

Hindfoot (TTC) nail

A retrograde tibiotalocalcanear intramedullary nail — the ultimate superconstruct — for Sanders Type 4 ankle and subtalar destruction with valgus collapse, or salvage after a failed midfoot fusion.

Deformity correctable?
Exostectomy
No — removes the prominence only; the underlying deformity persists
Arthrodesis
Yes — corrects alignment and eliminates the prominence
Ulcer healing rate
Exostectomy
60 to 80 percent initially
Arthrodesis
80 to 90 percent when the deformity is corrected
Ulcer recurrence
Exostectomy
30 to 50 percent at 2 to 3 years
Arthrodesis
10 to 20 percent if fusion is solid
Joint mobility
Exostectomy
Preserved
Arthrodesis
Sacrificed at the fused joints
Bone quality required
Exostectomy
Minimal (local resection only)
Arthrodesis
Adequate for fixation (Stage II to III)
Recovery time
Exostectomy
4 to 6 weeks (partial weight-bearing)
Arthrodesis
12 to 16 weeks (non-weight-bearing)
Reoperation rate
Exostectomy
30 to 50 percent (recurrent prominence)
Arthrodesis
10 to 20 percent (nonunion, infection)
Best indication
Exostectomy
Isolated prominence, braceable foot, compliant patient
Arthrodesis
Unbraceable deformity, recurrent ulcer, instability
Exostectomy vs arthrodesis — the operative decision
FactorExostectomyArthrodesis
Deformity correctable?No — removes the prominence only; the underlying deformity persistsYes — corrects alignment and eliminates the prominence
Ulcer healing rate60 to 80 percent initially80 to 90 percent when the deformity is corrected
Ulcer recurrence30 to 50 percent at 2 to 3 years10 to 20 percent if fusion is solid
Joint mobilityPreservedSacrificed at the fused joints
Bone quality requiredMinimal (local resection only)Adequate for fixation (Stage II to III)
Recovery time4 to 6 weeks (partial weight-bearing)12 to 16 weeks (non-weight-bearing)
Reoperation rate30 to 50 percent (recurrent prominence)10 to 20 percent (nonunion, infection)
Best indicationIsolated prominence, braceable foot, compliant patientUnbraceable deformity, recurrent ulcer, instability

Pre-operative optimisation. The Charcot patient is a high-risk host — optimise before you cut. Target HbA1c below 8 to 9 percent, confirm perfusion with ABI and toe pressures (revascularise first if ABI less than 0.45 or toe pressure less than 30 to 40 mmHg), correct nutrition (albumin above 3.0 g/dL, pre-albumin above 15 mg/dL), mandate smoking cessation, and screen for infection. If an ulcer is present, take deep cultures and image for osteomyelitis before planning a definitive fusion — infected bone must be cleared first, often in a staged (debridement then delayed fusion) sequence. Imaging. Weight-bearing radiographs of both feet (AP, lateral, oblique) measure the deformity; CT maps fragmentation, bone stock and joint involvement for hardware planning; MRI separates Charcot from osteomyelitis (both show marrow oedema) and identifies abscess or sinus tracts; a labelled white-cell scan distinguishes infection from Charcot when MRI is equivocal. Consent. Be honest about magnitude: deep infection up to 30 percent, nonunion 10 to 40 percent, wound breakdown 15 to 25 percent, and a real possibility that the reconstruction fails and amputation is ultimately required — up to a quarter of Charcot patients come to some level of amputation. Recovery is prolonged: non-weight-bearing for months, and six months or more before full function. Setup. Supine with a sandbag under the ipsilateral buttock to internally rotate the leg and bring the dorsum of the foot into the field; a bump under the knee relaxes the popliteal structures if a posterior approach is needed. Thigh tourniquet at 250 to 300 mmHg, kept under 90 to 120 minutes in the diabetic, vasculopathic limb. General or spinal anaesthesia with a popliteal sciatic and saphenous block for post-operative analgesia. C-arm from the contralateral side for lateral views and from the foot end for AP — fluoroscopy is used throughout.

The Operation


The goal is to remove the plantar prominence, realign the medial column to a plantigrade foot, and stabilise it with fixation strong enough to survive months of protected loading in osteopenic bone. The dominant technique is the dorsal approach to the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints for a Sanders Type 2 rocker-bottom reconstruction — laid out step by step below, with the exposure as the opening moves. The approach is chosen by Sanders pattern: | Pattern | Primary approach | Joints exposed | |---------|------------------|----------------| | Type 2 (TMT) | Dorsal longitudinal over the TMT joints (1st and 2nd interspace) | First, second and often third TMT joints; naviculocuneiform | | Type 3 (midtarsal) | Dorsal or combined dorsomedial | Talonavicular, naviculocuneiform, calcaneocuboid | | Type 4 (hindfoot) | Lateral (for a TTC nail) with posterior or medial approaches | Subtalar, ankle, tibiotalocalcaneal | | Type 1 (forefoot) | Plantar or dorsal | MTP joints, metatarsal heads |

Charcot midfoot beaming reconstruction
Charcot midfoot reconstruction with intramedullary beaming screws, realigning and stabilising the collapsed arch.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence — midfoot (Sanders Type 2) reconstruction

Step 1Position & setup
  • Supine, sandbag under the ipsilateral buttock, thigh tourniquet, C-arm available throughout.
  • Confirm the deformity and the planned incision with the foot held in the position of deformity.
Step 2Plan the incision — find the apex
  • Mark a longitudinal dorsal incision over the second TMT joint, centred on the apex of the rocker-bottom deformity as seen on the lateral radiograph.
  • Extend proximally to the naviculocuneiform joint and distally to the second metatarsal base as needed.
  • For extensive exposure across multiple TMT joints, use two separate dorsal incisions (one over the first TMT, one over the second to fourth TMT) rather than a single long incision with compromised wound edges.
Step 3Skin incision — full thickness, no undermining
  • Carry the incision full-thickness straight down to the extensor retinaculum in the diabetic foot — the dorsal skin is thin and atrophic and must not be undermined.
  • Plan around previous ulceration or scar.
Dangers at the skin incision
  • Thin atrophic dorsal skin in the diabetic foot — keep incisions full-thickness and avoid undermining.
  • Previous ulceration or scar — plan incisions to avoid compromised skin.
  • The dorsalis pedis artery runs in the field between EHL and EDL — identify it before deepening.
  • Excessive swelling distorts anatomy — deflate the tourniquet and reassess if needed.
Step 4Deep dissection & joint exposure — the exposure
  • Deepen through subcutaneous tissue to the extensor retinaculum. Identify and protect the EHL and EDL tendons.
  • Locate the dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve running between EHL and EDL — tag them with vessel loops and keep them under direct vision throughout.
  • Retract EHL medially and EDL laterally. Incise the dorsal joint capsules of the TMT joints longitudinally.
  • Clear soft tissue and Charcot debris from the joint surfaces with curettes and rongeurs.
Protect the dorsal neurovascular bundle

Find the deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery between EHL and EDL early, tag them, and keep them under direct vision throughout. Charcot tissue is inflamed and friable — use blunt dissection around the neurovascular structures and sharp dissection only at the joint capsule.

Step 5Deformity assessment & bone resection
  • Before any resection, place a K-wire into the medial cuneiform and another into the talus and check alignment under fluoroscopy to understand the deformity apex and the correction needed.
  • Resect the Charcot debris and sclerotic bone from the TMT surfaces with an oscillating saw and osteotomes to create bleeding cancellous bone surfaces that will fuse.
  • Remove enough bone to realign the medial column — typically 5 to 15 mm of resection at the apex — and correct the dorsal angulation to bring the forefoot into a plantigrade position relative to the hindfoot.
  • Confirm under fluoroscopy that the plantar midfoot prominence has been eliminated.
Dangers at bone resection
  • Inadequate resection leaves a residual plantar prominence that will re-ulcerate — check from the lateral fluoroscopic view.
  • Over-resection destabilises the midfoot and makes length and alignment hard to restore.
  • Penetration of the plantar cortex creates a new prominence or weakens the remaining bone.
  • The tarsal tunnel structures (tibial nerve and vessels) lie plantar to the resection — protect with a retractor.
Step 6Temporary reduction & fluoroscopic check
  • Reduce the TMT joints anatomically and hold with temporary K-wires placed dorsal-to-plantar across each TMT joint.
  • Confirm in AP, lateral and oblique views: AP shows TMT alignment and a restored medial column with no residual subluxation; lateral shows a plantigrade foot with no plantar prominence and a corrected Meary angle; oblique confirms the second TMT (the keystone) is reduced.
Step 7Definitive fixation — the superconstruct
  • Dorsal plates across the second and third TMT joints, and a medial plate along the first TMT joint (medial cuneiform to first metatarsal).
  • Large-diameter (4.0 to 6.5 mm) partially threaded cannulated screws across each TMT joint in lag technique, from dorsal-to-plantar or medial-to-lateral depending on trajectory.
  • A medial column bolt from the first metatarsal head through the medial cuneiform and into the navicular gives powerful compression across the entire medial column — especially useful when the Charcot zone reaches the naviculocuneiform joint.
  • Extend the fixation at least one joint beyond the Charcot zone in both directions (the superconstruct spanning principle).
Dangers at fixation
  • Screws penetrating the plantar cortex create new prominences — check length on lateral fluoroscopy.
  • Dorsal plates beneath thin skin — use low-profile plates and consider removing them at 9 to 12 months if symptomatic.
  • Inadequate purchase in osteopenic Charcot bone — use large-diameter screws, locked constructs and supplementary bolt fixation.
  • Failure to span beyond the Charcot zone invites adjacent-joint collapse.
Step 8Bone grafting
  • Fill the arthrodesis bed with autograft (iliac crest or local calcaneal graft).
  • In extensive defects, supplement with allograft cancellous chips or BMP-2 on an absorbable collagen sponge, packed into all resection gaps and between the joint surfaces.
Step 9Wound closure & immobilisation
  • Release the tourniquet, achieve haemostasis, and close in layers.
  • Apply a well-padded below-knee posterior splint or cast with the foot in neutral dorsiflexion and slight hindfoot valgus.

Exostectomy — the simpler alternative When the foot is otherwise braceable and the problem is a single plantar prominence with a non-healing ulcer, resect the prominence alone. 1. Approach through a plantar incision directly over the ulcer or prominence. Excise the ulcer en bloc with the underlying bony prominence.

  1. Resect the plantar bony prominence flush with the surrounding plantar cortex using a rongeur or oscillating saw.
  2. Confirm fluoroscopically that no residual plantar prominence remains.
  3. Obtain deep cultures and histology of the resected bone — if osteomyelitis is found, extend the debridement and plan subsequent arthrodesis.
  4. Close over a drain and apply a total-contact cast.
Send every exostectomy specimen for culture

Always take the specimen for histology and deep cultures. If the bone shows osteomyelitis, exostectomy alone has a high failure rate — plan a staged approach: TCC to heal the wound, then definitive arthrodesis once the infection has cleared.

Hindfoot reconstruction — tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail For Sanders Type 4 ankle and subtalar destruction, or salvage of a failed midfoot fusion, a retrograde TTC nail is the definitive superconstruct. - Approach: lateral trans-fibular. The fibula is osteotomised and the proximal fragment removed (fibular subtraction) to expose the ankle and subtalar joints; a posterolateral incision gives access to the calcaneal tuber nail entry point.

  • Joint preparation: resect the tibial plafond, talar dome and subtalar joint surfaces to bleeding bone; correct the hindfoot to neutral or slight valgus.
  • Fixation: insert a retrograde nail from the calcaneal tuber, across the subtalar joint, through the talar body and into the tibial medullary canal — spanning calcaneus to tibia. Add anterior locking screws into the talar neck and calcaneus for rotational control.
  • Graft: fill the resection defects with autograft and allograft.
Dangers at the TTC nail
  • Nail malalignment — the entry point must be central on the calcaneal tuber on both AP and lateral views.
  • Talar body penetration or fracture — the Charcot talus is osteopenic and may fracture during reaming.
  • Anterior tibial cortex penetration by the nail tip — confirm fluoroscopically.
  • Residual plantar prominence after correction — confirm on lateral fluoroscopy before closure.

Intramedullary beaming — protecting the construct Beyond plate-and-screw fixation, intramedullary beaming — smooth or threaded K-wires or small-diameter nails run along the metatarsal canals from dorsal to plantar, crossing the TMT arthrodesis and seating into the cuneiforms or tarsal bones — adds axial load-sharing that protects the construct from bending failure in cyclic loading. It is low-profile (no added hardware prominence) and can be removed in clinic once fusion is confirmed at 6 to 12 months.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Management | |-------|--------|----------------|------------| | 1 | Weeks 0 to 2 | Non-weight-bearing below-knee cast or rigid posterior splint; elevate 48 to 72 hours | Wound check at 5 to 7 days then weekly; multimodal analgesia; continue targeted antibiotics 4 to 6 weeks if a pre-operative ulcer was present | | 2 | Weeks 2 to 8 | Strict non-weight-bearing below-knee cast; cast changes every 2 weeks | Touch-down only (less than 15 kg) from 6 to 8 weeks if early consolidation is seen | | 3 | Weeks 8 to 12 | CROW boot or total-contact cast | Progressive weight-bearing as tolerated, guided by serial radiographs | | 4 | Weeks 12 to 16 plus | Diabetic shoe with custom-moulded insole once fusion is confirmed; CROW boot or orthotics long-term in many | Consider hardware removal of prominent implants at 9 to 12 months once fused | Fusion is confirmed radiographically when bridging trabeculae cross the arthrodesis on three views with no hardware loosening. The fused Charcot foot remains at lifelong risk of ulceration from abnormal pressure distribution, so custom moulded orthotics or a CROW boot continue indefinitely in many patients. ### Total-contact casting — the non-operative gold standard Indications: acute Charcot (Stage 0 to I), plantar ulcer offloading, post-exostectomy protection, and protected weight-bearing after arthrodesis. Technique 1. Apply a thin layer of stockinette over the foot and lower leg — keep the toes visible for monitoring, do not fold back over them. 2. Place felt padding over bony prominences (malleoli, tibial crest, heel), avoiding the ulcerated area. 3. Wrap the foot and leg in two layers of cast padding, moulding the plantar surface to the corrected foot shape. 4. Apply plaster or fibreglass in a below-knee configuration, moulding the cast against the plantar surface to redistribute pressure away from the ulcer or prominence. 5. Change the cast every 1 to 2 weeks for inspection. Complications of TCC: new pressure ulceration (inspect skin at every change), ankle equinus contracture from prolonged immobilisation, and patient non-compliance (difficult for obese patients or those with limited hand function). ### Special situations

Charcot with active osteomyelitis

Osteomyelitis and Charcot coexist and are hard to separate on MRI alone — both show marrow oedema. If deep bone biopsy or a labelled white-cell scan confirms infection, infection is the primary pathology. Treat with aggressive debridement of infected bone, culture-directed antibiotics for 6 to 8 weeks, and delayed reconstruction after clearance. Never fuse through infected bone — it will fail. If the foot is unstable after debridement, temporary external fixation holds it while the infection is controlled.

Charcot with critical ischaemia

ABI less than 0.45 or toe pressure less than 30 to 40 mmHg indicates critical limb ischaemia. Revascularise (angioplasty or bypass) before elective reconstruction, then allow a 2 to 4 week reperfusion period before fusion. In patients who cannot be revascularised, amputation may be the most appropriate option — reconstruction in an ischaemic foot carries catastrophic wound complication rates.

Bilateral Charcot foot

Up to 25 percent of patients develop contralateral involvement. If one foot has been reconstructed and the other becomes active, immobilise the new side in TCC while protecting the reconstructed side in a CROW boot. Bilateral reconstruction is staged — let one side fuse and resume weight-bearing before operating the other. Bilateral non-weight-bearing creates major nursing and mobility challenges, so plan for inpatient rehabilitation.

Complications

Deep infection and osteomyelitis
Incidence
Up to 30 percent
Recognition
Wound dehiscence, purulent drainage, fever, rising inflammatory markers; MRI shows marrow signal change around hardware. May present insidiously in the insensate patient.
Prevention and management
Prevention: optimise glycaemic control, treat active ulcers before elective fusion, consider staged procedures, perioperative antibiotics. Management: urgent washout and debridement, deep cultures, IV antibiotics; remove hardware if fusion is solid, otherwise convert to external fixation or amputation.
Nonunion
Incidence
10 to 40 percent (site dependent)
Recognition
Persistent pain on weight-bearing, hardware loosening or breakage on serial radiographs, no bridging trabeculae across the arthrodesis at 6 months.
Prevention and management
Prevention: superconstruct fixation, bone grafting, prolonged non-weight-bearing. Management: revise with a stronger construct, add bone graft or BMP, extend immobilisation; consider amputation if revision fails.
Hardware failure
Incidence
5 to 20 percent
Recognition
Broken screws, fractured plate or bent nail on radiographs. May be asymptomatic if fusion has occurred, or painful if nonunion is present.
Prevention and management
Prevention: strongest fixation from the outset, prolonged non-weight-bearing. Management: if fused, remove broken hardware; if not fused, revise with a more robust construct.
Wound breakdown and dehiscence
Incidence
15 to 25 percent
Recognition
Skin necrosis, wound separation, exposed hardware or bone. Often delayed (2 to 4 weeks post-operatively); insensate patients may not report symptoms.
Prevention and management
Prevention: meticulous soft-tissue handling, limit tourniquet time, avoid long single incisions, generous postoperative padding. Management: wound care, negative-pressure therapy, soft-tissue coverage (rotational or free flap) if hardware is exposed.
Recurrent ulcer over a prominence
Incidence
10 to 20 percent after arthrodesis
Recognition
Return of plantar ulceration at a new or incompletely corrected site, often from residual deformity or hardware prominence.
Prevention and management
Prevention: fluoroscopic confirmation that no plantar prominence remains; remove plantar-sided hardware once fused. Management: TCC, consider revision arthrodesis or exostectomy.
Recurrent Charcot collapse
Incidence
5 to 15 percent
Recognition
Progressive deformity at a new site adjacent to the fusion mass — a new rocker-bottom or hindfoot valgus as the process activates at adjacent joints.
Prevention and management
Prevention: extend fusion beyond the Charcot zone (superconstruct principle). Management: repeat immobilisation (TCC), consider extending the fusion.
Amputation
Incidence
Up to 25 percent overall
Recognition
End-stage salvage failure — a non-salvageable foot with uncontrollable infection, nonunion or non-ambulatory status.
Prevention and management
Prevention: careful patient selection, optimisation, timely reconstruction before deformity is irrecoverable. Management: below-knee (transtibial) amputation preferred for ambulatory patients; above-knee if knee extension is deficient or thigh involvement is extensive.
Complications — recognition, prevention and management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention and management
Deep infection and osteomyelitisUp to 30 percentWound dehiscence, purulent drainage, fever, rising inflammatory markers; MRI shows marrow signal change around hardware. May present insidiously in the insensate patient.Prevention: optimise glycaemic control, treat active ulcers before elective fusion, consider staged procedures, perioperative antibiotics. Management: urgent washout and debridement, deep cultures, IV antibiotics; remove hardware if fusion is solid, otherwise convert to external fixation or amputation.
Nonunion10 to 40 percent (site dependent)Persistent pain on weight-bearing, hardware loosening or breakage on serial radiographs, no bridging trabeculae across the arthrodesis at 6 months.Prevention: superconstruct fixation, bone grafting, prolonged non-weight-bearing. Management: revise with a stronger construct, add bone graft or BMP, extend immobilisation; consider amputation if revision fails.
Hardware failure5 to 20 percentBroken screws, fractured plate or bent nail on radiographs. May be asymptomatic if fusion has occurred, or painful if nonunion is present.Prevention: strongest fixation from the outset, prolonged non-weight-bearing. Management: if fused, remove broken hardware; if not fused, revise with a more robust construct.
Wound breakdown and dehiscence15 to 25 percentSkin necrosis, wound separation, exposed hardware or bone. Often delayed (2 to 4 weeks post-operatively); insensate patients may not report symptoms.Prevention: meticulous soft-tissue handling, limit tourniquet time, avoid long single incisions, generous postoperative padding. Management: wound care, negative-pressure therapy, soft-tissue coverage (rotational or free flap) if hardware is exposed.
Recurrent ulcer over a prominence10 to 20 percent after arthrodesisReturn of plantar ulceration at a new or incompletely corrected site, often from residual deformity or hardware prominence.Prevention: fluoroscopic confirmation that no plantar prominence remains; remove plantar-sided hardware once fused. Management: TCC, consider revision arthrodesis or exostectomy.
Recurrent Charcot collapse5 to 15 percentProgressive deformity at a new site adjacent to the fusion mass — a new rocker-bottom or hindfoot valgus as the process activates at adjacent joints.Prevention: extend fusion beyond the Charcot zone (superconstruct principle). Management: repeat immobilisation (TCC), consider extending the fusion.
AmputationUp to 25 percent overallEnd-stage salvage failure — a non-salvageable foot with uncontrollable infection, nonunion or non-ambulatory status.Prevention: careful patient selection, optimisation, timely reconstruction before deformity is irrecoverable. Management: below-knee (transtibial) amputation preferred for ambulatory patients; above-knee if knee extension is deficient or thigh involvement is extensive.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

CHARCOTCHARCOT — assessment and staging

C
Cool or warm?
A temperature difference of greater than 2 degrees from the contralateral foot signals active inflammation.
H
Hot foot
Use an infrared dermal thermometer — active Charcot produces measurable temperature asymmetry.
A
Assess the stage
Eichenholtz 0 clinical with normal X-rays, I fragmentation, II coalescence, III consolidation.
R
Rocker-bottom
Midfoot collapse with a plantar bony prominence — the classic Sanders Type 2 (TMT/Lisfranc) pattern.
C
Charcot vs cellulitis
Charcot is painless in an insensate foot; cellulitis is painful. If unsure, immobilise and image.
O
Offloading
Total-contact cast for acute Charcot; CROW boot for quiescent deformity; surgery only if unbraceable.
T
Timing
Wait for Eichenholtz Stage II to III before elective arthrodesis; Stage I surgery risks nonunion and infection.
Mnemonic

SUPERSUPER — superconstruct principles (Sammarco)

S
Span beyond
Extend the arthrodesis into adjacent uninvolved joints where bone stock is better and fixation purchase is reliable.
U
Use strongest fixation
Intramedullary nails, large-diameter screws, medial and dorsal plates, bolts — not standard small-fragment fixation.
P
Prolonged immobilisation
Non-weight-bearing for 8 to 12 weeks minimum, often 12 to 16 weeks or longer.
E
Excise enough bone
Resect sufficient bone to fully correct the deformity and eliminate the plantar prominence.
R
Reinforce with graft
Autograft (iliac crest or local calcaneal), allograft or BMP to supplement the arthrodesis bed.
Eichenholtz Stage I — do not fuse

The trap is operating on a hot, swollen, actively fragmenting foot believing early fixation will prevent progression. The reality is that bone is actively resorbing — fixation pulls out, the arthrodesis bed has no healing capacity, and surgery turns a manageable collapse into an infected nonunion with hardware failure. Wait for Stage II to III (clinical cooling, coalescence or consolidation on imaging) before elective reconstruction.

Insensate wound breakdown

The Charcot patient has peripheral neuropathy and cannot feel wound problems. A dehiscence that in a sensate foot would hurt and prompt early review can progress silently to deep infection and osteomyelitis. Prevention is meticulous soft-tissue handling, avoiding extensive dorsal dissection where skin is thin, considering staged procedures (external fixation first) in high-risk cases, and weekly wound inspection for the first 4 to 6 weeks.

Hardware prominence and recurrent ulcer

Fixation on the plantar surface — plantar plates or protruding screw tips — creates a new prominence in the insensate foot that ulcerates post-operatively, the very problem the surgery meant to eliminate. Place hardware dorsally or laterally wherever possible; if a plantar plate is required, countersink fully and confirm on fluoroscopy that nothing protrudes below the plantar cortex. Plan to remove plantar-sided hardware once fusion is confirmed, often at 6 to 9 months.

Nonunion with hardware failure

Charcot bone is osteopenic and biologically poor — standard screws cut through cancellous bone and plates break under cyclic loading before fusion is achieved. Apply superconstruct principles: extend the fusion beyond the Charcot zone, use intramedullary nails or beaming for axial load-sharing, supplement plate fixation with multiple points of fixation, accept prolonged non-weight-bearing for 8 to 12 weeks minimum, and bone-graft the arthrodesis bed.

Deep infection and osteomyelitis

Charcot patients often have pre-existing or recent plantar ulceration with bacterial colonisation of bone, diabetes with impaired immunity and wound healing, and co-existing vascular disease. Deep infection rates after reconstruction reach up to 30 percent across series; hardware removal may be required and the fusion is lost. Two-stage procedures (external fixation to stabilise, then delayed fusion after infection control) may be needed, and some cases end in amputation.

Misdiagnosis — cellulitis vs acute Charcot

A hot, swollen, erythematous diabetic foot is treated as cellulitis with antibiotics when the true diagnosis is acute Charcot (Stage 0 to I). The distinguishing feature is that Charcot is painless or only mildly uncomfortable in an insensate patient, often with prior Charcot episodes, while cellulitis is typically painful. Maintain a high index of suspicion, compare skin temperature with the contralateral foot, obtain MRI (marrow oedema and microfractures), and immobilise promptly — do not just prescribe antibiotics.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 56-year-old man with Type 2 diabetes presents with a 3-month history of a non-healing plantar midfoot ulcer. He has a rocker-bottom deformity of the left foot with a 2 cm ulcer directly beneath the midfoot prominence. Radiographs show collapsed TMT joints with debris and early coalescence. Temperature measurement shows a 0.5-degree difference from the right foot. He has been in a CROW boot for 10 weeks with no improvement. How do you manage him?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 62-year-old woman with Type 2 diabetes presents with a 4-week history of a hot, swollen left foot after walking through an airport in sandals. She has had diabetes for 18 years with peripheral neuropathy. The left foot is erythematous, swollen and warm to touch, but she says it is not particularly painful. Her GP started oral antibiotics for cellulitis 10 days ago with no improvement. How do you manage this?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 60-year-old man with Type 2 diabetes had a midfoot Charcot reconstruction with TMT arthrodesis 14 months ago at another hospital. Radiographs show solid fusion, but there is a new ulcer on the plantar aspect of the foot just distal to the arthrodesis site, with a bony prominence on the lateral view that was not present on the immediate post-operative films. How do you explain this and manage him?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Charcot Foot Reconstruction — exam-day essentials

Diagnosis and staging

  • Eichenholtz Stage 0: clinical inflammation, normal X-rays. Stage I: fragmentation. Stage II: coalescence. Stage III: consolidation.
  • A painless warm swollen foot in an insensate diabetic is acute Charcot until proven otherwise.
  • Charcot vs cellulitis: Charcot is painless (neuropathy), cellulitis is painful. Both cause erythema and swelling. If in doubt, immobilise and image.
  • MRI is the investigation of choice — marrow oedema, microfractures, subluxation. A labelled white-cell scan helps distinguish Charcot from osteomyelitis.
  • Sanders patterns: Type 1 forefoot, Type 2 TMT (most common, rocker-bottom), Type 3 midtarsal, Type 4 hindfoot, Type 5 calcaneus.

Non-operative management

  • Total-contact casting (TCC) is the gold standard for acute Charcot (Stage 0 to I) and ulcer offloading.
  • Cast changes every 1 to 2 weeks. Continue until the foot cools (8 to 12 weeks).
  • CROW boot for quiescent Stage III deformity that is stable and braceable.
  • Do NOT operate during Eichenholtz Stage I (active fragmentation) — catastrophic fixation failure.
  • Ulcer healing requires offloading the mechanical cause. Antibiotics alone do not heal ulcers over bony prominences.

Indications for surgery

  • Unbraceable deformity that cannot be accommodated in a CROW boot or AFO.
  • Recurrent or non-healing plantar ulcer over a bony prominence despite adequate offloading.
  • Deep infection with osteomyelitis in the Charcot foot.
  • Acute instability or fracture-dislocation threatening the soft tissues.
  • Contraindications: Eichenholtz Stage I, uncontrolled infection, critical ischaemia without revascularisation.

Superconstruct principles (Sammarco)

  • Extend the fusion beyond the zone of Charcot injury to include uninvolved joints.
  • Use the strongest possible fixation — IM nails, large screws, plates, bolts.
  • Accept prolonged immobilisation — non-weight-bearing 8 to 12 weeks minimum.
  • Resect sufficient bone to fully correct the deformity and eliminate the plantar prominence.
  • Reinforce with bone graft (autograft, allograft or BMP).

Surgical anatomy

  • TMT (Lisfranc) complex: medial, middle and lateral columns. The second TMT is the keystone.
  • Lisfranc ligament: medial cuneiform to second metatarsal base — destroyed in Type 2 Charcot, producing medial column collapse.
  • Dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve run between EHL and EDL on the dorsal midfoot — identify and protect during the dorsal approach.
  • Sanders Type 2 (TMT) is the most common pattern — rocker-bottom midfoot with a plantar ulcer.
  • Hindfoot Charcot (Type 4): tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an IM nail — retrograde nail from calcaneus through talus into tibia.

Operative technique — key steps

  • Pre-op: optimise HbA1c, assess vascular status (ABI, toe pressures), rule out osteomyelitis with MRI.
  • Position: supine, sandbag under the buttock, C-arm fluoroscopy available throughout.
  • Approach: dorsal longitudinal over the TMT joints for midfoot; lateral trans-fibular for a hindfoot TTC nail.
  • Resect Charcot debris and the plantar prominence — check fluoroscopically that no residual bump remains.
  • Reduce to plantigrade alignment, hold with temporary K-wires, confirm under fluoroscopy.
  • Definitive fixation: plates, large screws, medial column bolt, intramedullary beaming. Extend beyond the Charcot zone.
  • Bone graft into all arthrodesis beds. Close in layers. Below-knee non-weight-bearing cast.

Complications

  • Deep infection and osteomyelitis: up to 30 percent. Treat with washout, debridement, culture-directed antibiotics, hardware removal if fused.
  • Nonunion: 10 to 40 percent. Revise with stronger fixation and bone graft; amputation if revision fails.
  • Hardware failure: 5 to 20 percent. Remove if fused, revise if not.
  • Wound breakdown: 15 to 25 percent. Insensate patients need weekly visual wound checks.
  • Recurrent Charcot at adjacent joints: 5 to 15 percent. May need to extend the fusion.
  • Amputation: up to 25 percent overall. Below-knee amputation preferred for ambulatory patients.

Post-operative protocol

  • Weeks 0 to 2: non-weight-bearing below-knee cast. Weekly wound inspection.
  • Weeks 2 to 8: non-weight-bearing cast. Cast changes every 2 weeks.
  • Weeks 8 to 12: transition to a CROW boot with progressive weight-bearing if consolidation is visible on radiographs.
  • Weeks 12 to 16 plus: custom diabetic shoe with a moulded insole once fusion is confirmed.
  • Hardware removal: consider at 9 to 12 months for prominent dorsal plates or plantar-sided fixation.

Background & Evidence


The disease. Charcot neuroarthropathy is a progressive destruction of bone and joint in an insensate foot, most often in the setting of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Repeated, unperceived microtrauma in a foot that cannot protect itself drives an inflammatory cycle of bone resorption, fragmentation and collapse. The structural end-point is a deformed, unstable foot — classically the rocker-bottom midfoot (Sanders Type 2, the most common pattern) — whose plantar bony prominence ulcerates under body weight. Up to a quarter of patients develop contralateral involvement, and up to a quarter eventually come to some level of amputation. Surgical anatomy of the midfoot. The tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) complex — the most common site of Charcot collapse — has three functional columns: the medial (first metatarsal, medial cuneiform, navicular) supporting the medial arch; the middle (second metatarsal keystone, recessed 1 to 2 mm and anchored by the Lisfranc ligament); and the lateral (third to fifth metatarsals, lateral cuneiform, cuboid), the more mobile column. The Lisfranc ligament runs from the plantar medial cuneiform to the base of the second metatarsal; when it is destroyed the medial column drops into rocker-bottom. On the dorsum, the EHL and EDL tendons run superficially and the dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve pass between them — the structures identified and protected in the dorsal approach. The blood supply comes from the dorsalis pedis (dorsal midfoot), the medial plantar artery (plantar midfoot and heel), and the perforating branches that connect the two and must be preserved to avoid devascularising bone fragments during correction. Deformity patterns and their consequences. In a Sanders Type 2 rocker-bottom, the medial column collapses through the first and second TMT joints and the navicular and medial cuneiform drop plantarly, producing a convex plantar midfoot prominence that ulcerates beneath the plantar fat pad — loss of the longitudinal arch transfers load from heel to midfoot prominence. A Type 3 midtarsal pattern collapses through the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints, producing forefoot abduction and a lateral column ulcer. A Type 4 hindfoot pattern gives progressive hindfoot valgus, talar dome collapse and fibular impingement, with medial malleolar ulceration.

0 (prodromal)
Clinical features
Warm, swollen, erythematous foot; pain absent or mild; early inflammation
Radiographic features
Normal radiographs or subtle subluxation; bone scan or MRI shows early marrow oedema
Treatment priority
Immobilise immediately — total-contact cast. Do NOT operate unless acute instability threatens the skin.
I (fragmentation)
Clinical features
Hot, swollen foot; temperature greater than 2 degrees above the contralateral side; joint effusion
Radiographic features
Bony fragmentation, subluxation, dislocation; debris and osseous destruction at involved joints
Treatment priority
Non-operative — continue TCC. Elective reconstruction is contraindicated. Exception: fracture-dislocation threatening the skin — urgent external fixation.
II (coalescence)
Clinical features
Cooling of the foot; reduced swelling; temperature difference diminishing
Radiographic features
Absorption of debris; new bone formation; coalescence of fragments; joint surfaces beginning to fuse
Treatment priority
Consider surgery — the foot is cooling and bone is consolidating; elective arthrodesis can be planned once the temperature normalises.
III (consolidation)
Clinical features
Normal temperature; minimal or no swelling; fixed deformity
Radiographic features
Consolidated bone; remodelled deformity; stable but malaligned architecture
Treatment priority
Surgery indicated if the deformity is unbraceable, there is an ulcer over a prominence, or instability is present.
Eichenholtz staging — the timing framework
StageClinical featuresRadiographic featuresTreatment priority
0 (prodromal)Warm, swollen, erythematous foot; pain absent or mild; early inflammationNormal radiographs or subtle subluxation; bone scan or MRI shows early marrow oedemaImmobilise immediately — total-contact cast. Do NOT operate unless acute instability threatens the skin.
I (fragmentation)Hot, swollen foot; temperature greater than 2 degrees above the contralateral side; joint effusionBony fragmentation, subluxation, dislocation; debris and osseous destruction at involved jointsNon-operative — continue TCC. Elective reconstruction is contraindicated. Exception: fracture-dislocation threatening the skin — urgent external fixation.
II (coalescence)Cooling of the foot; reduced swelling; temperature difference diminishingAbsorption of debris; new bone formation; coalescence of fragments; joint surfaces beginning to fuseConsider surgery — the foot is cooling and bone is consolidating; elective arthrodesis can be planned once the temperature normalises.
III (consolidation)Normal temperature; minimal or no swelling; fixed deformityConsolidated bone; remodelled deformity; stable but malaligned architectureSurgery indicated if the deformity is unbraceable, there is an ulcer over a prominence, or instability is present.
1
Location
Forefoot (MTP joints)
Typical deformity
Dislocated toes, plantar metatarsal heads
Common presentation
Metatarsal head ulceration, transfer metatarsalgia
2
Location
Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc)
Typical deformity
Rocker-bottom midfoot, medial column collapse
Common presentation
Plantar midfoot ulcer over the bony prominence (most common pattern)
3
Location
Midtarsal (talonavicular, naviculocuneiform)
Typical deformity
Lateral column collapse, forefoot abduction
Common presentation
Lateral foot ulcer, peritalar subluxation
4
Location
Ankle and subtalar
Typical deformity
Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency, hindfoot valgus, ankle instability
Common presentation
Medial malleolar or lateral hindfoot ulcer
5
Location
Calcaneus
Typical deformity
Posterior calcaneal fragmentation, loss of heel height
Common presentation
Posterior heel ulcer, Achilles tendon dysfunction
Sanders anatomic classification — the pattern determines the approach
TypeLocationTypical deformityCommon presentation
1Forefoot (MTP joints)Dislocated toes, plantar metatarsal headsMetatarsal head ulceration, transfer metatarsalgia
2Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc)Rocker-bottom midfoot, medial column collapsePlantar midfoot ulcer over the bony prominence (most common pattern)
3Midtarsal (talonavicular, naviculocuneiform)Lateral column collapse, forefoot abductionLateral foot ulcer, peritalar subluxation
4Ankle and subtalarPosterior tibial tendon insufficiency, hindfoot valgus, ankle instabilityMedial malleolar or lateral hindfoot ulcer
5CalcaneusPosterior calcaneal fragmentation, loss of heel heightPosterior heel ulcer, Achilles tendon dysfunction

Key evidence. Total-contact casting remains the first-line treatment for acute Charcot, supported by long-term cohort data (Fabrin) showing most feet stabilise conservatively, with surgery reserved for unbraceable deformity or recurrent ulceration. The case for operative reconstruction rests on the superconstruct concept (Sammarco): standard small-fragment fixation is biomechanically inadequate in osteopenic neuropathic bone, so the arthrodesis must be extended beyond the zone of injury and reinforced with the strongest available fixation, prolonged immobilisation, bone resection to full correction, and bone graft. Contemporary systematic review (Ha) confirms that reconstruction achieves reasonable fusion and limb-salvage rates but carries substantial complication rates — deep infection, wound breakdown, nonunion and amputation — making careful patient selection and pre-operative optimisation essential.

References


Evidence

Is the Eichenholtz classification still valid for the diabetic Charcot foot?

Level IV
Chantelau EA, Grützner G • Swiss Med Wkly (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Re-examined Eichenholtz's three-stage classification (development/fragmentation, coalescence, consolidation) and confirmed its continued clinical validity for staging diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy
  • Confirmed that natural history progresses from acute inflammatory destruction with hyperaemia and bone resorption to a quiescent stage with consolidation and fixed deformity
  • Staging remains the most widely used system for timing surgical intervention — operative reconstruction is deferred until coalescence/consolidation when bone has regained healing capacity
Clinical implication: Eichenholtz staging is the primary guide for surgical timing — reconstructive arthrodesis should be deferred until Stage II to III.
Source: Swiss Med Wkly 2014;144:w13948
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24764120)
Evidence

Superconstructs in the treatment of Charcot foot deformity: plantar plating, locked plating, and axial screw fixation

Level IV
Sammarco VJ • Foot Ankle Clin (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Defined the superconstruct principles for Charcot arthrodesis: extend fusion well beyond the zone of injury into adjacent uninvolved joints, use the strongest possible fixation (intramedullary nails, large-diameter screws, medial and dorsal plates, plantar plates, bolts), accept prolonged non-weight-bearing immobilisation
  • Described surgical technique for Charcot midfoot and hindfoot reconstruction using plantar plating, locked plating and axial screw fixation in poor-quality neuropathic bone
  • Emphasised that standard small-fragment fixation is biomechanically inadequate for the osteopenic, mechanically poor Charcot foot
Clinical implication: Superconstruct principles are the foundation of modern Charcot reconstruction — extend fixation beyond the zone of injury and use the strongest available constructs.
Source: Foot Ankle Clin 2009;14(3):393-407
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19712882)
Evidence

Long-term follow-up in diabetic Charcot feet with spontaneous onset

Level III
Fabrin J, Larsen K, Holstein PE • Diabetes Care (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term cohort follow-up of diabetic patients with Charcot feet of spontaneous onset managed with non-operative treatment (total-contact casting and Charcot-restraint-orthotic walker)
  • Most feet stabilised with conservative treatment; recurrence of ulceration was the main late complication, especially over residual bony prominences
  • Surgery (exostectomy or arthrodesis) was reserved for patients with unbraceable deformity or recurrent ulceration over a prominence — supporting TCC as the first-line treatment for acute Charcot
Clinical implication: TCC remains first-line for acute Charcot; surgery is indicated only for selected patients whose deformity cannot be managed non-operatively.
Source: Diabetes Care 2000;23(6):796-800
Verify on PubMed (PMID 10840999)
Evidence

Are the Sanders-Frykberg and Brodsky-Trepman Classifications Reliable in Diabetic Charcot Neuroarthropathy?

Level III
Wukich DK, Raspovic K, Liu GT, Van Pelt MD, Lalli T, Chhabra A, Nakonezny P, La Fontaine J, Lavery L, Kim PJ • J Foot Ankle Surg (2021)
Key Findings:
  • Validated the Sanders-Frykberg five-pattern anatomic classification of Charcot foot (forefoot, tarsometatarsal, midtarsal, hindfoot, calcaneus) and the Brodsky-Trepman scheme
  • Confirmed inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of both classifications in contemporary practice, with the Sanders-Frykberg pattern dictating surgical approach and extent of arthrodesis
  • Type 2 (TMT/Lisfranc) is the most common pattern, producing the classic rocker-bottom midfoot deformity
Clinical implication: Sanders classification guides surgical planning — the pattern of Charcot involvement determines the approach, fixation, and extent of arthrodesis.
Source: J Foot Ankle Surg 2021;60(3):432-435
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33549422)
Evidence

Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review

Level III
Ha J, Hester T, Foley R, Reichert ILH, Vas PRJ, Ahluwalia R, Kavarthapu V • J Clin Orthop Trauma (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of contemporary Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes across reconstructive techniques (internal fixation, external fixation, and combined constructs)
  • Achieved limb salvage in the majority of patients; fusion rates and ulcer healing rates vary with fixation method, anatomic site, and Eichenholtz stage at surgery
  • Complication rates are substantial — deep infection, wound breakdown, nonunion, hardware failure and amputation are all reported; careful patient selection and pre-operative optimisation are essential
Clinical implication: Charcot reconstruction achieves reasonable fusion and limb-salvage rates but complication rates are substantial — careful patient selection and preoperative optimisation are essential.
Source: J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;11(3):357-368
Verify on PubMed (PMID 32405193)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
35 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
35 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Dorsal Approach to MidfootMedial Approach to the Talus and Navicular
Browse all procedures