Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Dorsal Approach to Midfoot

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaAdvanced

Dorsal Approach to Midfoot

Comprehensive guide to dorsal approaches to the midfoot for Lisfranc injuries, tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, midfoot fractures, and Charcot reconstruction, including multiple longitudinal incisions, deep peroneal nerve protection, and compartment-specific access to medial, middle, and lateral columns.

Procedure console
9 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Lisfranc Injuries | TMT Arthrodesis | Multiple Longitudinal Incisions | Deep Peroneal Nerve at Risk

2-3Longitudinal dorsal incisions (medial, central, lateral) - avoid a single transverse incision across the dorsum
approx 3cmRecommended minimum soft-tissue bridge between adjacent longitudinal incisions to preserve perfusion
ReductionQuality of articular reduction is the principal determinant of outcome - displacement over 2mm or talometatarsal angle over 15deg mandates open reduction (Myerson 1986)
approx 95%TMT arthrodesis union rate with rigid fixation and joint preparation (Komenda & Myerson 1996; Ly & Coetzee 2006)
PTAPost-traumatic arthritis far less common after primary arthrodesis than ORIF (2.8% vs 17.3% pooled - O'Connor 2024)
ReoperationUnplanned reoperation lower after primary arthrodesis than ORIF (14.7% vs 38.3% - O'Connor 2024); hardware prominence common on the subcutaneous dorsal foot
Critical Must-Knows
  • Multiple longitudinal incisions are the rule: the dorsal foot skin has limited cross-circulation between angiosomes, so a single transverse incision across the dorsum risks ischaemic flaps. Use 2-3 longitudinal incisions parallel to the metatarsals and preserve an adequate (approximately 3cm or more) soft-tissue bridge between them.
  • Two-incision technique (standard): a medial incision over the 1st-2nd metatarsal interval accesses the 1st TMT joint; a dorsal incision over the 2nd-3rd metatarsal interval accesses the 2nd-3rd TMT joints (the safe zone between the deep and superficial peroneal nerves). A three-incision technique adds a lateral incision over the 4th-5th interval if the lateral column is injured.
  • The deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery run together over the dorsal midfoot between the EHL and EDL tendons in the first webspace, medial to the dorsal 2nd-3rd incision. Injury causes EDB/EHB weakness and first-webspace numbness (NOT a foot drop). Identify the bundle early and protect it during 2nd-3rd TMT exposure.
  • Three-column concept: medial column (1st TMT), middle column (2nd-3rd TMT, the keystone of the midfoot arch and most critical for stability), lateral column (4th-5th TMT, mobile and usually pinned, not fused). Most Lisfranc injuries involve the medial and middle columns.
  • Primary indications: displaced Lisfranc injuries (over 2mm TMT diastasis or talometatarsal angle over 15deg mandates open reduction - Myerson 1986); reduction quality is the chief outcome determinant. TMT arthrodesis (primary for ligamentous injury, post-traumatic arthritis, Charcot collapse, inflammatory arthritis); displaced midfoot fractures.
  • Avoid transverse incisions: they cross the longitudinal angiosomes and create ischaemic skin flaps. If exposure is inadequate, extend a longitudinal incision or add a separate longitudinal incision rather than connecting incisions transversely.

When & Why


What it exposes. The dorsal approach to the midfoot is a family of longitudinal incisions on the dorsum of the foot giving access to the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints (the Lisfranc joint complex), the naviculocuneiform and intercuneiform joints, and the metatarsal bases. It is the workhorse exposure for Lisfranc injuries, primary TMT arthrodesis, displaced midfoot fractures (cuneiform, navicular, metatarsal base), and Charcot or deformity reconstruction. The anatomic principle that drives incision design. The dorsum of the foot is supplied by longitudinal angiosomes (vascular territories) with limited cross-communication. A single transverse incision across the dorsum therefore risks devascularising the intervening skin and creating ischaemic flaps, and parallel incisions placed too close together leave a narrow, poorly perfused bridge. Standard technique uses multiple longitudinal incisions (2-3) oriented parallel to the metatarsal shafts, separated by an adequate soft-tissue bridge (commonly cited as approximately 3cm or more), with full-thickness incisions straight down to bone and no undermining. Three-column concept. Incision planning follows the three midfoot columns:

  • Medial column: 1st TMT joint (1st metatarsal to medial cuneiform) and the medial naviculocuneiform joint.
  • Middle column: 2nd and 3rd TMT joints (2nd/3rd metatarsals to middle/lateral cuneiforms) - the keystone of the midfoot arch.
  • Lateral column: 4th and 5th TMT joints (4th/5th metatarsals to cuboid), plus the calcaneocuboid joint; mobile, and generally pinned rather than fused. Most Lisfranc injuries involve the medial and middle columns (Myerson Types A-C) and are managed with the two-incision technique; a third lateral incision is added only when the lateral column is injured. Primary indications.
  • Lisfranc injuries with displacement over 2mm - purely ligamentous (1st-2nd TMT diastasis) or fracture-dislocation. Myerson 1986 established that the quality of reduction is the chief determinant of outcome, and that displacement over 2mm or a talometatarsal angle over 15deg after closed reduction mandates open reduction. Modern comparative evidence (Ly & Coetzee 2006; O'Connor 2024) favours primary arthrodesis over ORIF for primarily ligamentous injuries.
  • Primary TMT arthrodesis: post-traumatic arthritis, Charcot arthropathy, inflammatory arthritis, severe progressive flatfoot deformity.
  • Displaced midfoot fractures requiring ORIF: navicular body fractures, cuneiform fractures, intra-articular metatarsal base fractures with over 2mm step-off.
  • Relative indications: non-displaced Lisfranc injuries with instability on weight-bearing or stress views; revision surgery. Contraindications. Absolute: active infection (osteomyelitis, soft-tissue abscess) until eradicated; severe vascular insufficiency (ABI less than 0.5, absent pulses, tissue loss); an insensate foot in a patient who cannot comply with offloading. Relative: significant soft-tissue injury (crush, compartment syndrome sequelae) favouring delayed surgery or external fixation; non-displaced stable injuries suitable for non-operative care; severe osteoporosis (consider primary arthrodesis rather than ORIF). Position & landmarks. Supine with a bump under the ipsilateral hip to externally rotate the leg and present the dorsum; thigh tourniquet inflated to 300-350mmHg after exsanguination (haemostasis is critical for these small midfoot structures); C-arm brought in from the contralateral side. Palpate and mark the 1st metatarsal base, the recessed 2nd metatarsal base (the keystone, sitting between the cuneiforms), the navicular tuberosity, the cuboid, and the dorsalis pedis pulse in the 1st-2nd interval (which marks the deep peroneal nerve location).

The Exposure


The midfoot is exposed through two (occasionally three) longitudinal dorsal incisions. The medial incision opens the 1st TMT joint; the dorsal incision in the 2nd-3rd metatarsal interval - the safe zone between the deep and superficial peroneal nerves - opens the 2nd and 3rd TMT joints after the neurovascular bundle is identified and protected.

Dorsal approach to midfoot
Dorsal approach to the midfoot, exposing the tarsometatarsal joints between the extensor tendons.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Exposure sequence

Step 1Position, landmarks and incision planning
  • Supine with a bump under the ipsilateral hip to externally rotate the leg and present the dorsum; thigh tourniquet at 300-350mmHg after exsanguination; C-arm from the contralateral side.
  • Palpate and mark the 1st metatarsal base, the recessed 2nd metatarsal base (keystone), the navicular tuberosity and the dorsalis pedis pulse in the 1st-2nd interval.
  • Plan two (or three) LONGITUDINAL incisions parallel to the metatarsals: medial over the 1st-2nd interval, dorsal over the 2nd-3rd interval, and lateral over the 4th-5th interval only if the lateral column is injured. Preserve a soft-tissue bridge of approximately 3cm or more between adjacent incisions.
Step 2Medial incision - skin to the extensor tendons
  • A 6-8cm longitudinal incision over the 1st-2nd metatarsal interval, from the naviculocuneiform joint level to the mid-diaphysis of the 1st metatarsal.
  • Incise straight down to bone in a single full-thickness pass - do NOT raise subcutaneous flaps, as the dorsal skin is poorly perfused.
  • Identify and protect the crossing branches of the superficial peroneal nerve (intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve); injury causes dorsal numbness or a tender neuroma.
Step 3Expose the 1st TMT joint (medial column)
  • Identify the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon - the most medial extensor - and retract it laterally off the 1st metatarsal base.
  • Incise the capsule over the 1st TMT joint longitudinally and elevate the periosteum subperiosteally from the 1st metatarsal base and medial cuneiform.
  • The 1st TMT joint is now exposed dorsally and medially; extend proximally to the naviculocuneiform joint if required.
Step 4Dorsal incision - open the 2nd-3rd interval
  • A 6-8cm longitudinal incision over the 2nd-3rd metatarsal interval (the safe zone), keeping an adequate bridge (approximately 3cm or more) from the medial incision.
  • Incise full-thickness to the extensor tendons and identify the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) tendons to the 2nd and 3rd toes.
  • Retract the EDL tendons apart (2nd-toe tendon medially, 3rd-toe tendon laterally) to approach the 2nd and 3rd TMT joints.
Step 5Identify and protect the deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery
  • The neurovascular bundle runs between EHL medially and EDL laterally in the first webspace, deep to the extensor tendons on the surface of the 2nd metatarsal base and middle cuneiform.
  • Identify the bundle early - before incising the capsule - and pass a vessel loop around it to mark and gently retract it.
  • Use gentle retraction only (traction neurapraxia is the commonest nerve injury) and avoid diathermy near the nerve.
Step 6Capsulotomy - expose the 2nd and 3rd TMT joints
  • Incise the capsule longitudinally over the 2nd and/or 3rd TMT joints and elevate the periosteum from the metatarsal bases and cuneiforms.
  • The 2nd metatarsal base is RECESSED between the cuneiforms (the keystone); slight plantar flexion of the 2nd metatarsal or a small laminar spreader opens the joint for visualisation.
  • The deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery lie medial to this interval (first webspace); the superficial peroneal branches lie lateral (4th-5th webspace) - staying in the 2nd-3rd interval avoids both.
Step 7Lateral incision (when the lateral column is injured)
  • A separate 5-7cm longitudinal incision over the 4th-5th metatarsal interval, from the calcaneocuboid joint to the mid-diaphyses, with an adequate bridge from the dorsal incision.
  • Expose the 4th and 5th TMT joints and the cuboid; the lateral column is mobile and is generally reduced and pinned (K-wires), not fused, to preserve motion.
Step 8Closure
  • Copious saline lavage; reapproximate the capsules where possible with absorbable suture (3-0 Vicryl), close the subcutaneous layer, then skin with interrupted or subcuticular nylon or monocryl.
  • Bulky compressive dressing and a posterior splint with the ankle and foot neutral; non-weight-bearing for the first six weeks.
Respect the dorsal skin perfusion - multiple longitudinal incisions, never transverse

The dorsal foot is supplied by longitudinal angiosomes with limited cross-communication. A single transverse incision, or parallel incisions placed too close together, devascularises the intervening skin and produces ischaemic flaps. Use two or three longitudinal incisions parallel to the metatarsals, keep a soft-tissue bridge of approximately 3cm or more between them, and make every incision full-thickness down to bone without undermining.

The 2nd-3rd metatarsal interval is the safe zone

The deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery run medially in the first webspace; the superficial peroneal branches run laterally toward the 4th-5th webspace. The 2nd-3rd metatarsal interval lies between the two, so a dorsal incision here minimises nerve injury - but the deep peroneal bundle must still be identified and looped before the capsule is opened.

Dangers & Extensions


Structures at risk, by layer

Skin / subcutaneous
Structure at risk
Superficial peroneal nerve branches (cross the dorsum obliquely)
Protection
Longitudinal full-thickness incisions; identify and protect, or sharply divide and bury the end to avoid a symptomatic neuroma
Dorsal incision (2nd-3rd interval)
Structure at risk
Deep peroneal nerve + dorsalis pedis artery (first webspace, medial to the incision)
Protection
Identify early after retracting EDL; vessel loop around the bundle; gentle retraction; no diathermy near the nerve
Joint (2nd TMT)
Structure at risk
Recessed 2nd metatarsal base (keystone) with the neurovascular bundle nearby
Protection
Slight plantar flexion of the 2nd metatarsal or a laminar spreader to open the joint; drill under fluoroscopy when placing screws
Skin bridge
Structure at risk
Perfusion of the intervening skin between parallel incisions
Protection
Keep a bridge of approximately 3cm or more; never connect incisions transversely; no undermining
Danger structures and how to protect them
Layer / locationStructure at riskProtection
Skin / subcutaneousSuperficial peroneal nerve branches (cross the dorsum obliquely)Longitudinal full-thickness incisions; identify and protect, or sharply divide and bury the end to avoid a symptomatic neuroma
Dorsal incision (2nd-3rd interval)Deep peroneal nerve + dorsalis pedis artery (first webspace, medial to the incision)Identify early after retracting EDL; vessel loop around the bundle; gentle retraction; no diathermy near the nerve
Joint (2nd TMT)Recessed 2nd metatarsal base (keystone) with the neurovascular bundle nearbySlight plantar flexion of the 2nd metatarsal or a laminar spreader to open the joint; drill under fluoroscopy when placing screws
Skin bridgePerfusion of the intervening skin between parallel incisionsKeep a bridge of approximately 3cm or more; never connect incisions transversely; no undermining

Neurovascular anatomy. The deep peroneal nerve supplies the short toe extensors (EHB, EDB) through its terminal lateral branch and the first-webspace skin through its medial branch; the long extensors and tibialis anterior are supplied in the anterior compartment of the leg and are NOT at risk at the foot. An injury at the foot therefore gives only mild EDB/EHB weakness (NOT a foot drop) and first-webspace numbness - usually a traction neurapraxia recovering over weeks to months, with less reliable recovery after sharp transection. The dorsalis pedis artery is the continuation of the anterior tibial artery; if injured it can usually be ligated because the plantar collateral circulation is adequate, but a cold, pale foot post-operatively needs urgent vascular review. The superficial peroneal branches (medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerves) frequently cross the incisions and cause dorsal numbness or a tender neuroma if injured. Extensile options. Each longitudinal incision can be extended proximally to the naviculocuneiform or calcaneocuboid joint, or distally along the metatarsal shafts. If more exposure is needed, extend an existing incision or add a SEPARATE longitudinal incision (with an adequate bridge) - never convert two parallel incisions into a single transverse incision. Closure. Irrigate, reapproximate capsules where possible, close the subcutaneous tissue and skin, and apply a bulky dressing with a posterior splint holding the foot neutral. Hardware prominence is common on the subcutaneous dorsum, so use low-profile implants and warn the patient that elective removal may be needed.

Procedures Through This Approach


  • ORIF of Lisfranc injury / TMT fracture-dislocation - the principal indication for the trauma exposure.
  • TMT arthrodesis (isolated or multi-ray) and Lapidus / 1st TMT arthrodesis for hallux valgus - primary fusion for ligamentous injury, post-traumatic arthritis, Charcot collapse and inflammatory arthritis.
  • ORIF of displaced midfoot fractures (navicular body, cuneiform, intra-articular metatarsal base) and Charcot midfoot reconstruction. Reduction sequence (medial to lateral). Reduce the 1st TMT first (the medial column is foundational): plantar pressure on the 1st metatarsal head with a medial and plantar pull on the base restores the articulation with the medial cuneiform, held on two 2.0mm K-wires. Reduce the 2nd TMT next (the keystone): elevate and disimpact the recessed 2nd metatarsal base until its medial border is flush with the middle cuneiform on the AP view, then pin it. The 3rd TMT usually follows the 2nd indirectly. Reduce the lateral column (4th-5th TMT) last and pin it. Confirm on multiple fluoroscopic views that the 1st-2nd diastasis is less than 2mm before definitive fixation; if it persists, add an intercuneiform screw. Fixation options

Best suited to
ORIF (screws / bridge plate)
Bony fracture-dislocations; younger, high-demand patients wanting motion
Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
Primarily ligamentous injuries; severe cartilage damage, comminution, Charcot, failed ORIF
Mean AOFAS (pooled)
ORIF (screws / bridge plate)
75.7
Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
84.4 (favoured, p = 0.004)
Post-traumatic arthritis
ORIF (screws / bridge plate)
around 17.3%
Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
around 2.8% (fused levels cannot arthrose)
Unplanned reoperation
ORIF (screws / bridge plate)
38.3%
Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
14.7% (p less than 0.001)
Hardware removal
ORIF (screws / bridge plate)
Much more common (RR 0.23 vs fusion, Smith 2016)
Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
Less common
Motion
ORIF (screws / bridge plate)
TMT motion preserved
Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
Lost at fused levels (minimal functional cost - the medial/middle TMT joints are nearly immobile)
ORIF vs primary arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries
FeatureORIF (screws / bridge plate)Primary arthrodesis (medial 2-3 rays)
Best suited toBony fracture-dislocations; younger, high-demand patients wanting motionPrimarily ligamentous injuries; severe cartilage damage, comminution, Charcot, failed ORIF
Mean AOFAS (pooled)75.784.4 (favoured, p = 0.004)
Post-traumatic arthritisaround 17.3%around 2.8% (fused levels cannot arthrose)
Unplanned reoperation38.3%14.7% (p less than 0.001)
Hardware removalMuch more common (RR 0.23 vs fusion, Smith 2016)Less common
MotionTMT motion preservedLost at fused levels (minimal functional cost - the medial/middle TMT joints are nearly immobile)
- Transarticular screws (most common for ORIF): 4.0-4.5mm cannulated screws across each TMT joint - two for the 1st TMT (one dorsal, one plantar), one to two for the 2nd TMT, one for the 3rd if unstable, and an optional intercuneiform screw for medial-arch stability. Temporary screws (removed around 12 weeks once ligaments heal) versus retained screws is debated; there is no high-quality evidence favouring one strategy, but any screw strategy carries the ORIF hardware burden.

  • Bridge / dorsal plating: a low-profile 2.7mm or 3.5mm plate along the metatarsal bases avoids transarticular cartilage violation and suits comminuted or osteoporotic bone - an AO-Foundation-favoured alternative.
  • Primary arthrodesis: remove cartilage to bleeding subchondral bone, compress with screws and/or dorsal plates, and bone-graft large defects; union is high (around 95%, Komenda & Myerson 1996; Ly & Coetzee 2006). For ligamentous injuries the RCT reported AOFAS 88 after arthrodesis versus 68.6 after ORIF (p less than 0.005). Global practice. The indication for surgery (over 2mm diastasis, or a talometatarsal angle over 15deg after closed reduction) is universal across AAOS, BOA/BOAST and AO Foundation teaching. The genuine divergence is the threshold for primary arthrodesis: Level I evidence and pooled meta-analyses increasingly favour primary fusion of the medial 2-3 rays for primarily ligamentous injuries, while ORIF remains standard for bony fracture-dislocations and in younger patients prioritising motion. Implant choice varies by resource setting (cannulated screws are universal; dedicated low-profile Lisfranc plates and suture-button devices are used where available). No country-specific billing or coding applies. Post-operative protocol. Non-weight-bearing for 0-6 weeks with suture removal at 2-3 weeks; partial weight-bearing in a boot from 6-12 weeks as radiographic healing permits; full weight-bearing and boot weaning around 12 weeks. Remove lateral-column K-wires at 6-8 weeks; remove temporary transarticular screws around 12 weeks if planned.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

LONGITUDINALLONGITUDINAL - dorsal midfoot incision principles

L
Longitudinal
Parallel to the metatarsal shafts - follows the angiosome direction and preserves dorsal blood supply
O
One is not enough
Need 2-3 longitudinal incisions for the medial, middle and lateral columns
N
Never transverse
A transverse incision crosses the longitudinal angiosomes and risks ischaemic skin flaps
G
Gap (skin bridge)
Keep an adequate soft-tissue bridge (approximately 3cm or more) between parallel incisions
I
Internervous interval
The 2nd-3rd metatarsal interval is the safe zone between the deep and superficial peroneal nerves
T
Three-incision option
Add a lateral (4th-5th interval) incision when the lateral column is injured
U
No undermining
Full-thickness incisions straight down to bone; do not raise subcutaneous flaps
D
Deep peroneal nerve
Runs between EHL and EDL with the dorsalis pedis artery in the first webspace - identify early
I
Incision length
6-8cm each gives adequate exposure without excessive skin tension at closure
N
Necrosis minimised
Longitudinal incisions, preserved skin bridges and no undermining minimise wound complications
A
Angiosomes preserved
Longitudinal blood supply to the dorsal foot is maintained
L
Location standard
Medial (1st-2nd interval), Dorsal (2nd-3rd interval), Lateral (4th-5th interval)
Mnemonic

MEDIAL-KEY-LATERALMEDIAL-KEY-LATERAL - Lisfranc reduction sequence

M
Medial first
Reduce the 1st TMT first - the medial column is foundational and sets the arch reference
E
Evaluate alignment
Confirm the 1st TMT is anatomic on fluoroscopy before proceeding
D
Direct pressure
Plantar pressure on the 1st metatarsal head plus a medial/plantar pull on the base reduces the 1st TMT
I
Insert K-wires
Two K-wires across the 1st TMT hold the reduction temporarily
A
Assess diastasis
The 1st-2nd diastasis should narrow toward normal (less than 2mm) once the 1st TMT is reduced
L
Look for the nerve
Identify the deep peroneal nerve in the dorsal incision before working on the 2nd TMT
K
Keystone next
The 2nd TMT is the most critical joint for midfoot arch stability
E
Elevate the base
Disimpact and elevate the dorsally subluxated 2nd metatarsal base with an elevator or laminar spreader
Y
Yield anatomic alignment
The medial border of the 2nd metatarsal must align flush with the middle cuneiform on the AP view
L
Lateral last
The 4th-5th TMT often reduces indirectly; fixate the lateral column last and pin it (do not fuse)
A
All joints checked
Confirm less than 2mm diastasis and no step-off on AP, lateral and oblique fluoroscopy
T
Transarticular screws
Place definitive cannulated screws once anatomic reduction is confirmed
E
Expect arthritis
Post-traumatic arthritis occurs in 25-40% long-term even with anatomic reduction - cartilage damage is irreversible
R
Re-check diastasis
Final check of the 1st-2nd distance (less than 2mm); add an intercuneiform screw if it persists
A
Arthrodesis primary
Consider primary fusion for ligamentous or severe injuries (Ly & Coetzee 2006: AOFAS 88 vs ORIF 68.6)
L
Long-term follow-up
Serial radiographs; offer salvage TMT arthrodesis if symptomatic arthritis develops

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 32-year-old motorcyclist sustained a Lisfranc fracture-dislocation in a high-speed collision. Imaging shows a Type C divergent pattern (1st metatarsal displaced medially, 4th-5th metatarsals displaced laterally), 1st-2nd TMT diastasis of 8mm, and a 2nd metatarsal base fracture with dorsal subluxation. There is dorsal foot swelling with plantar ecchymosis, a palpable dorsalis pedis pulse and intact sensation, and no compartment syndrome. You plan ORIF via dorsal midfoot approaches. Describe your incision planning, reduction sequence and fixation strategy.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“Three years after anatomical ORIF for his Type C Lisfranc injury, your patient returns with moderate midfoot pain (VAS 6/10), worse on uneven ground, and radiographic TMT joint-space narrowing with subchondral sclerosis - despite maintained anatomic reduction. He asks why he has arthritis when the operation went perfectly. How do you explain this, and what are his options?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Dorsal midfoot approach - exam-day essentials

Critical anatomy

  • Deep peroneal nerve: runs in the first webspace between EHL (medially) and EDL (laterally) with the dorsalis pedis artery; supplies EDB/EHB and first-webspace sensation - injury at the foot is NOT a foot drop
  • 2nd metatarsal base (keystone): recessed dorsally between the cuneiforms, bears the greatest load, and is the most critical joint for midfoot arch stability
  • Dorsal foot blood supply: longitudinal angiosomes with limited cross-communication, so a transverse incision risks ischaemic flaps
  • Standard incisions: medial (1st-2nd interval), dorsal (2nd-3rd interval, the safe zone), lateral (4th-5th interval); keep a skin bridge of approximately 3cm or more

Primary indications

  • Lisfranc injuries displaced over 2mm (ligamentous or fracture-dislocation - Myerson Types A/B/C)
  • Myerson 1986: reduction quality is the chief determinant of outcome; over 2mm diastasis or talometatarsal angle over 15deg after closed reduction mandates open reduction
  • Primary TMT arthrodesis: post-traumatic arthritis, Charcot arthropathy, inflammatory arthritis, severe flatfoot deformity
  • Displaced midfoot fractures: navicular body, cuneiform, intra-articular metatarsal base (over 2mm step-off)

Surgical steps

  • Two-incision standard (medial 1st-2nd interval, dorsal 2nd-3rd interval); add a lateral incision if the lateral column is injured; keep an adequate (approximately 3cm or more) skin bridge
  • Deep peroneal nerve: identify early in the dorsal incision (after retracting EDL), loop the neurovascular bundle, retract gently
  • Reduction medial-to-lateral: 1st TMT first (foundational), 2nd TMT second (keystone, most critical), 3rd TMT follows the 2nd, lateral column last
  • Fluoroscopy: AP view - medial border of the 2nd metatarsal flush with the middle cuneiform; 1st-2nd diastasis less than 2mm
  • Fixation: transarticular screws (1st TMT two screws, 2nd TMT one to two) or bridge plate; primary arthrodesis for ligamentous/severe injuries

Complications

  • Wound complications are the characteristic risk of dorsal midfoot surgery - longitudinal incisions with preserved skin bridges and no undermining minimise them
  • Deep peroneal nerve injury - usually a traction neurapraxia; mild EDB/EHB weakness (NOT a foot drop) and first-webspace numbness
  • Post-traumatic arthritis even with anatomic reduction - pooled around 17% after ORIF vs around 3% after primary arthrodesis (O'Connor 2024); malreduction is the strongest modifiable risk factor
  • Loss of reduction - inadequate fixation, early weight-bearing, hardware failure - revise/augment if early or observe and plan arthrodesis if late
  • Hardware prominence and removal - common on the subcutaneous dorsum; much higher after ORIF than fusion (Smith 2016)

Evidence

  • Myerson 1986: reduction quality determines outcome; only 49% good/excellent overall
  • Ly & Coetzee 2006 (RCT, primarily ligamentous): primary arthrodesis AOFAS 88 vs ORIF 68.6 (p less than 0.005); activity 92% vs 65%
  • O'Connor 2024 (18 studies): AOFAS 84.4 vs 75.7; PTA 2.8% vs 17.3%; unplanned reoperation 14.7% vs 38.3%
  • Smith 2016 (CORR): hardware removal much more common after ORIF than fusion (RR 0.23)
  • Komenda & Myerson 1996: salvage TMT arthrodesis improved AOFAS from 44 to 78 (p = 0.02)

Exam-day power phrases

  • Multiple longitudinal incisions are the rule for the dorsal midfoot - avoid a single transverse incision, which crosses the longitudinal angiosomes and risks ischaemic flaps, and keep a skin bridge of approximately 3cm or more
  • The deep peroneal nerve runs between EHL and EDL with the dorsalis pedis artery - identify it early, loop the bundle, retract gently; injury gives mild EDB/EHB weakness and first-webspace numbness, not a foot drop
  • Reduce medial-to-lateral: 1st TMT first (foundational), 2nd TMT second (keystone - its medial border must align flush with the middle cuneiform on the AP view), then 3rd TMT, then the lateral column
  • Displacement over 2mm or a talometatarsal angle over 15deg after closed reduction requires operative reduction - Myerson 1986 established that reduction quality is the chief determinant of outcome
  • Post-traumatic arthritis occurs even with anatomic reduction - around 17% after ORIF vs around 3% after primary arthrodesis (O'Connor 2024); salvage fusion improves AOFAS from 44 to 78 (Komenda & Myerson 1996)
  • For primarily ligamentous injuries, consider primary arthrodesis of the medial 2-3 rays - Ly & Coetzee 2006 AOFAS 88 vs ORIF 68.6
  • ORIF commits many patients to later hardware removal on the subcutaneous dorsum (RR 0.23 vs fusion, Smith 2016) - a key consent point

References


Evidence

Fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints: reduction quality determines outcome

Level IV - Long-term case series (foundational classification paper)
Myerson MS, Fisher RT, Burgess AR, Kenzora JE • Foot & Ankle (1986)
Key Findings:
  • 72 patients with 76 Lisfranc fracture-dislocations; 52 patients (55 injuries) available for long-term analysis at a mean 4.2 years - the source of the widely used Myerson A/B/C classification.
  • Only 49% achieved an excellent or good result and 51% a fair or poor result on the Painful Foot Center scoring system - underscoring how serious these injuries are.
  • The major determinant of an unacceptable result was the quality of the initial reduction; tarsal instability and late degenerative joint disease caused most symptoms.
  • Direct crush injuries did poorly (only 1 of 8 good or excellent). 44% of patients had, or were judged to need, further midfoot surgery.
  • Operative criterion established: displacement over 2mm or a talometatarsal angle over 15deg following closed reduction mandates open reduction with internal fixation.
Clinical implication: This landmark series defined the Myerson classification and established the enduring principle that anatomic reduction is the single most important controllable determinant of outcome in Lisfranc injuries. It justifies operative reduction for displacement over 2mm (or talometatarsal angle over 15deg) and explains why even well-treated injuries carry a substantial risk of late post-traumatic arthritis from the initial cartilage insult.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 3710321)
Evidence

Primary arthrodesis vs ORIF for primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries

Level I - Prospective randomised controlled trial
Ly TV, Coetzee JC • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2006)
Key Findings:
  • 41 patients with an isolated acute or subacute primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injury randomised to primary arthrodesis of the medial 2-3 rays (n=21) versus traditional open reduction and screw fixation (n=20); mean follow-up 42.5 months.
  • Anatomic initial reduction was achieved in 20/21 arthrodesis and 18/20 ORIF patients - both techniques reduced the joint well.
  • At 2 years the mean AOFAS Midfoot score was 88 after primary arthrodesis versus 68.6 after ORIF (p less than 0.005).
  • Patients estimated their postoperative activity level at 92% of pre-injury after arthrodesis versus only 65% after ORIF (p less than 0.005).
  • 5 of the ORIF patients developed persistent pain with deformity or osteoarthrosis and were ultimately treated with arthrodesis.
Clinical implication: For primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries, primary arthrodesis of the medial two or three rays gives better short- and medium-term function and return to activity than ORIF, and avoids a high rate of secondary salvage fusion. ORIF remains appropriate for bony fracture-dislocations; arthrodesis is particularly favoured for ligamentous disruption, severe articular damage, and comminution.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16510816)
Evidence

TMT arthrodesis as salvage for post-traumatic midfoot pain

Level IV - Retrospective case series (salvage arthrodesis)
Komenda GA, Myerson MS, Biddinger KR • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (1996)
Key Findings:
  • 32 patients underwent TMT arthrodesis for intractable pain a mean of 35 months after a traumatic midfoot injury, all with rigid internal fixation; 24 needed autogenous bone graft for debridement defects.
  • Mean AOFAS midfoot score improved from 44 pre-operatively to 78 post-operatively (p = 0.02) at a mean 50-month follow-up.
  • Complications were modest: neuritis in 3, metatarsalgia in 2, malunion in 2, and single cases of asymptomatic non-union, wound slough, superficial infection and complex regional pain syndrome.
  • Extent of fusion, involvement of other hindfoot/forefoot joints, mechanism of injury and work-relatedness did not significantly affect the functional result.
Clinical implication: TMT arthrodesis is a reliable salvage procedure for symptomatic post-traumatic midfoot arthritis or malunion, giving a large and durable improvement in function with an acceptable complication profile. It is the definitive option when conservative measures fail after a Lisfranc injury, and supports primary fusion as the index procedure when severe articular damage makes a good ORIF result unlikely.
Verify source (DOI)
Evidence

Primary arthrodesis vs ORIF for acute Lisfranc injuries (2024 meta-analysis)

Level I/II - Systematic review and meta-analysis (current best synthesis)
O'Connor KP, Tackett LB, Riehl JT • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2024)
Key Findings:
  • 18 comparative studies of acute Lisfranc injuries pooling primary arthrodesis (PA) versus ORIF.
  • Mean AOFAS was 84.4 after PA versus 75.7 after ORIF, with PA favoured on meta-analysis (effect size 0.41, p = 0.004) and lower VAS pain (p = 0.006).
  • Return to pre-injury activity 79.2% (PA) versus 65.7% (ORIF); midfoot post-traumatic arthritis 2.8% (PA) versus 17.3% (ORIF).
  • Unplanned reoperation (excluding planned hardware removal) 14.7% after PA versus 38.3% after ORIF (p less than 0.001); arthritis (OR 0.29) and reoperation (OR 0.16) both favoured PA.
  • Authors caution that long-term effects of PA - including possible adjacent-joint arthritis in young active patients - remain under-studied.
Clinical implication: The current best-available synthesis favours primary arthrodesis over ORIF for acute Lisfranc injuries on short- to medium-term function, pain, post-traumatic arthritis and unplanned reoperation. ORIF remains reasonable - particularly for bony fracture patterns and in younger patients where preserving motion and avoiding adjacent-joint load are priorities - but the trade-offs must be discussed explicitly during consent.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 39680239)
Evidence

ORIF vs primary fusion for Lisfranc trauma - hardware burden

Level I - Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials
Smith N, Stone C, Furey A • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of three randomised/comparative trials addressing whether ORIF or primary fusion improves outcomes for Lisfranc injuries.
  • The risk ratio for hardware removal was 0.23 (95% CI 0.11-0.45, p less than 0.001) - substantially MORE hardware removal after ORIF than after fusion.
  • No significant difference was found between groups for other revision surgery (RR 0.36, p = 0.18), patient-reported outcomes (SMD 0.50, p = 0.71), or risk of non-anatomic alignment (RR 1.48, p = 0.60).
  • Authors emphasise that the increased burden of hardware removal with ORIF, and its associated morbidity, should be discussed with patients pre-operatively.
Clinical implication: Even where functional outcomes appear comparable, ORIF commits a substantial proportion of patients to a further operation for hardware removal - a key counselling point and a recurring theme on the subcutaneous dorsal foot. This reinforces shared decision-making between ORIF and primary arthrodesis rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26022112)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
9 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Updated
2026-06-20
PROCEDURES USING THIS APPROACH
Lapidus Procedure (1st TMT Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus)ORIF Lisfranc Injury (Tarsometatarsal Fracture-Dislocation)Tarsometatarsal (TMT) Arthrodesis - Isolated or Multi-Ray
Browse all procedures