Girdlestone-Taylor Flexor-to-Extensor Transfer (Claw Toe)

Foot & AnkleIntermediateCore Procedure

Girdlestone-Taylor Flexor-to-Extensor Transfer (Claw Toe)

Surgical technique guide for the Girdlestone-Taylor flexor digitorum longus to extensor transfer for flexible clawed lesser toes - intrinsic-minus pathomechanics, indications, step-by-step transfer, MTP balancing, K-wire fixation, complications and rehabilitation

High-yield overview

Rerouting the flexor digitorum longus to the extensor expansion to restore intrinsic balance in a flexible clawed lesser toe | intermediate

Surgical Imaging

Toe flexor and extensor tendon anatomy
Toe flexor and extensor tendon anatomy — in the Girdlestone-Taylor transfer the flexor digitorum longus is rerouted dorsally onto the extensor to correct a flexible claw toe.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Flexible vs Fixed - The Cardinal Decision

The trap: Applying a dynamic flexor-to-extensor transfer to a toe with a RIGID PIP flexion contracture. A fixed deformity will not correct and the transfer will either fail outright or recurrently deform.

The fix: Confirm the deformity is PASSIVELY correctable before surgery (manipulate the toe into neutral under anaesthetic). If the PIP contracture does not reduce, convert to PIP arthrodesis or resection arthroplasty, adding the transfer only for any remaining flexible component.

Intrinsic-Minus Pathomechanics

The concept: A claw toe hyperextends at the MTP and flexes at the PIP and DIP because the lumbricals and interossei (which flex the MTP and extend the IP joints via the extensor expansion) have been overwhelmed or lost.

The implication: The Girdlestone-Taylor transfer is designed precisely to replace that lost intrinsic function - rerouting the FDL converts it into an MTP flexor and an IP extensor through the expansion. Recognising intrinsic-minus aetiology (cavus, Charcot-Marie-Tooth, neuromuscular) confirms the transfer is the right operation.

Digital Neurovascular Bundles at Risk

Location: The radial and ulnar digital nerves and arteries run along the sides of the toe, immediately adjacent to the path along which the split FDL slips are passed dorsally around the proximal phalanx.

Risk: A heavy clamp or tendon passer can injure a digital nerve or, worse, devascularise the toe when combined with swelling and an axial K-wire. Dissect and pass the slips strictly on the phalanx, deep but clear of the bundles, and recheck capillary refill throughout.

Over-correction and the Floating Toe

The trap: Tensioning the transfer too tightly, or over-lengthening the extensor, lifts the toe into hyperextension so it sits up off the ground - a FLOATING TOE that is cosmetically poor and functionally useless in push-off.

The fix: Tension the slips with the MTP held in slight flexion and the PIP neutral, secure the toe over a K-wire in the corrected position, and verify the toe rests flat against the adjacent toe intra-operatively. Slight under-tension is safer than over-tension.

Balance the MTP - Transfer Alone Is Not Enough

The trap: Expecting the FDL transfer alone to reduce a dorsally subluxed or dislocated MTP. The unopposed EDL and a contracted dorsal capsule remain the dominant deforming force.

The fix: Combine the transfer with EDL Z-lengthening, a dorsal MTP capsulotomy, and a plantar-plate release when the MTP is tight or subluxed. The transfer maintains correction; the soft-tissue release creates it.

Claw vs Hammer vs Mallet Toe

Claw toe: MTP hyperextension with PIP and DIP flexion (multi-level) - the intrinsic-minus deformity the Girdlestone-Taylor transfer addresses.

Hammer toe: PIP flexion (often with mild MTP hyperextension) but a relatively neutral DIP. Mallet toe: isolated DIP flexion. The transfer is NOT the primary procedure for an isolated mallet toe, which is treated by flexor tenotomy or DIP fusion.

Mnemonic

C.L.A.W.E.DCLAWED - Assessment and Indications

Mnemonic

T.R.A.N.S.F.E.RTRANSFER - Operative Steps and Principles

Mnemonic

F.L.O.A.TFLOAT - Recognising and Avoiding the Failed Toe

Mechanism of Disease - Why the Toe Claws

A clawed lesser toe is the visible result of an intrinsic-minus imbalance. The lumbricals and interossei normally act through the extensor (dorsal) expansion to flex the MTP joint and extend the interphalangeal joints. When these intrinsic muscles are weak, paralysed or mechanically overpowered:

  • The extensor digitorum longus (EDL), unopposed at the MTP, hyperextends the metatarsophalangeal joint and may dorsally sublux or dislocate it.
  • The flexor digitorum longus (FDL), unopposed distally, flexes the PIP and DIP joints.
  • The plantar plate and plantar capsule at the MTP attenuate dorsally, allowing progressive dorsal subluxation.

The net result is the classic claw posture: MTP hyperextension with PIP and DIP flexion. The Girdlestone-Taylor transfer directly reverses this by converting the FDL - the deforming flexor of the IP joints - into an intrinsic-substitute that flexes the MTP and helps extend the IP joints through the extensor expansion.

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Flexible (passively correctable) claw toe with a functional disability - pain, callosity over the dorsal PIP or under the metatarsal head, shoe-fitting difficulty, or skin breakdown
  • Symptomatic clawing in an intrinsic-plus-minus / intrinsic-minus foot (idiopathic, neuromuscular, post-compartment-syndrome, inflammatory arthropathy) where the deformity reduces under anaesthetic

Relative Indications

  • Flexible claw toes as part of a cavus or Charcot-Marie-Tooth foot reconstruction, combined with the appropriate bony and soft-tissue procedures
  • Flexible claw second toe associated with hallux valgus, addressed at the same time as the first-ray correction
  • Recurrent clawing after isolated soft-tissue release where residual flexibility remains

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Fixed (rigid) PIP deformity that does not passively correct - the transfer alone will fail; PIP arthrodesis or resection arthroplasty is the primary procedure
  • Active forefoot or toe sepsis or critical digital ischaemia
  • A non-correctable dislocated MTP that cannot be reduced even with extensive soft-tissue release (may require metatarsal shortening / Weil osteotomy or MTP resection)

Relative:

  • Peripheral vascular disease or significant neuropathy that compromises healing and the viability of the transferred tendon and toe
  • Untreated severe cavus or first-ray driven deformity - correcting the toes without addressing the driver invites rapid recurrence
  • Limited skin envelope on the dorsum of the toe that cannot accommodate the extensor lengthening and capsular work

Decision: Transfer vs PIP Fusion

The choice between a dynamic flexor-to-extensor transfer and a static PIP procedure is the central planning decision, and it rests on whether the deformity is flexible or fixed.

Girdlestone-Taylor Transfer vs PIP Arthrodesis

A flexible deformity with intrinsic-minus aetiology is the ideal indication for the transfer, whereas a fixed deformity is better served by PIP fusion - the two are complementary rather than competing, and many reconstructive cases combine elements of both.

Role of Associated Procedures

  • EDL Z-lengthening and dorsal MTP capsular release: essential whenever the MTP is hyperextended or dorsally subluxed; the transfer maintains what the release creates
  • Plantar-plate / plantar capsular release: needed for a subluxed or dislocated MTP that will not reduce with dorsal release alone
  • Weil osteotomy: shortens and/or elevates a metatarsal when metatarsalgia, overload or a long metatarsal coexists; often combined with the transfer for the second toe
  • Hallux valgus correction: addressed first when clawing of the second toe is secondary to hallux crowding
  • Cavus correction (Dwyer calcaneal osteotomy, first-ray plantarflexion correction, tendon transfers): the primary procedure in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth foot, with the lesser-toe work as a secondary stage

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 24-year-old woman presents with increasingly painful, flexible clawing of all four lateral toes of both feet. She has a cavus foot posture and reports her mother has similar feet. Walk me through your assessment and surgical plan.

Practical approach
This picture is classic for an intrinsic-minus claw-toe deformity in a cavus foot, with a strong family history raising Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease as the underlying diagnosis. I would approach her systematically: confirm the diagnosis, establish the cause, and plan the whole foot - not just the toes. **Assessment**: I confirm the toes are flexible and passively correctable, document callosities and any MTP subluxation, and examine the hindfoot. I perform a **Coleman block test**: if the hindfoot corrects to neutral on the block, the cavus is driven by a plantarflexed first ray (forefoot-driven) and the hindfoot is flexible; if it stays in varus, the hindfoot itself is fixed. I check for sensory loss, muscle imbalance (peroneus brevis weakness, Tibialis posterior preserved - the classic CMT pattern), and arrange neurophysiology and a neurology opinion to confirm Charcot-Marie-Tooth. **Principle**: The lesser-toe clawing here is a SECONDARY feature of the cavus. Operating on the toes in isolation will rapidly recur. The cavus must be addressed first. **Cavus surgery**: For a flexible, forefoot-driven cavus I would correct the plantarflexed first ray (a first metatarsal dorsiflexion osteotomy) plus a Dwyer lateralising calcaneal osteotomy for the hindfoot varus, and consider tendon balancing (for example a peroneus longus to peroneus brevis transfer). **The lesser toes**: Once the cavus is corrected, for these FLEXIBLE claw toes I would perform a **Girdlestone-Taylor flexor-to-extensor transfer** for each symptomatic toe, combined in every case with EDL Z-lengthening and a dorsal MTP capsular release to balance the subluxed MTP joints. Because they are flexible, dynamic correction is appropriate and preferable to PIP fusion, preserving some motion in a young, active patient. I would protect each transfer with an axial K-wire for four to six weeks. **Counselling**: I would be honest that the toes will be stiffer and swollen for months, that the transfer can over-correct into a floating toe or recur if the MTP is not balanced, and that the underlying Charcot-Marie-Tooth means her feet will need long-term surveillance.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

You performed a Girdlestone-Taylor transfer for a flexible claw second toe six months ago. The patient returns reporting that the toe now sits up off the ground, no longer touches the floor in barefoot gait, and rubbes painfully in shoes. What is the problem and how will you manage it?

Practical approach
This is an over-corrected FLOATING TOE - the transfer has been tensioned too tightly (or the extensor over-lengthened), so the toe is held in hyperextension and lifted off the ground, failing to load in gait. It is one of the two classic failure modes of lesser-toe tendon transfer, sitting at the opposite end of the spectrum from recurrence. **Assessment**: I confirm the toe rests in hyperextension and does not reach the ground in standing and gait, check the MTP and IP joints for flexibility versus fixed hyperextension, assess for a callosity or wound over the dorsum from shoe rub, and look at the neighbouring toes for crowding or secondary deformity. I review the pre-operative and post-operative photographs if available to gauge the change. Importantly I distinguish a flexible floating toe (will passively plantarflex to the ground) from a fixed one. **Why it happens**: The FDL slips were sutured too tight, or the EDL was over-lengthened, pulling (or failing to resist) the MTP into hyperextension. The principle error was tensioning the toe into extension rather than holding it in slight MTP flexion. **Non-operative**: If early and flexible, I would trial conservative measures first - a toe-strap or taping to encourage the toe down, accommodative footwear with a deep toe box, and a podiatry review for offloading - because some early over-correction settles as the transfer stretches slightly over the first year. **Operative**: If the toe is fixed in hyperextension, painful, or has not settled with conservative measures, I would revise. Revision options include releasing or lengthening the transfer to reduce the dorsiflexion force, converting to a phalangeal shortening or a flexor-based softening procedure, or - where the deformity is rigid - a formal correction with the understanding that the toe may need to be re-tensioned and re-pinned. I would set realistic expectations: a second toe that loads normally again is the goal, but it will remain a surgically managed, somewhat atypical toe. **Prevention (the real lesson)**: I tension the transfer with the MTP in slight flexion and verify intra-operatively that the corrected toe rests flat against its neighbour, accepting minor under-tension over any over-tension.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 68-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis has painful, fixed clawing of the second to fourth toes with dislocation of the second MTP and forefoot metatarsalgia. She asks whether the 'tendon transfer operation' you mentioned is right for her. How do you decide?

Practical approach
This patient is the WRONG candidate for an isolated Girdlestone-Taylor transfer, and I would explain clearly why. Her deformities are FIXED, with a dislocated second MTP and structural metatarsalgia - the cardinal prerequisites for a dynamic flexor-to-extensor transfer (a flexible, passively correctable toe and a reducible MTP) are absent. A transfer alone would fail to correct a rigid PIP and could not reduce a dislocated MTP. **The decision rests on flexibility**: I re-examine the toes under the office assessment (and would re-confirm under anaesthetic) to document that the PIP deformities do not passively correct and that the second MTP is dislocated and not reducible. This is a structural, fixed forefoot - the domain of static, bony and resection surgery rather than dynamic tendon transfer. **My surgical plan** for this rheumatoid forefoot is a resection arthroplasty / forefoot reconstruction approach: for the lesser toes I would perform **PIP arthrodesis (or PIP resection arthroplasty)** to correct the fixed PIP flexion, combined with **extensor lengthening and MTP soft-tissue release**. For the dislocated and overloaded metatarsals I would perform **metatarsal head resection (the classic rheumatoid forefoot arthroplasty) or Weil osteotomies** to shorten and offload the metatarsals and reduce the metatarsalgia. The hallux is usually addressed at the same sitting. **Where the transfer fits**: I might ADD a flexor-to-extensor transfer to a flexible component of a lesser toe if, after the static correction, residual flexibility and MTP instability remain - but it is an adjunct here, not the primary operation. The primary correction is static and bony. **Counselling**: I would set expectations for a rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction - prolonged swelling, the trade-off of stiffness for a straight, painless, shoeable foot, and the need to address the disease activity with her rheumatologist, since uncontrolled synovitis compromises the result. The 'tendon transfer operation' she has heard of is excellent for the flexible, intrinsic-minus toes of a younger cavus foot - but it is not the operation her fixed rheumatoid forefoot needs.
Exam day cheat sheet
Girdlestone-Taylor Flexor-to-Extensor Transfer (Claw Toe) - Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

The treatment of claw toes by multiple transfers of flexor into extensor tendons

Level V
Taylor RGJ Bone Joint Surg Br
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951;33-B(4):539-42
Evidence

The pathological anatomy of claw and hammer toes

Level IV
Myerson MS, Shereff MJJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71(1):45-9
Evidence

Mallet toes, hammer toes, claw toes, and corns. Causes and treatment of lesser-toe deformities

Level V
Coughlin MJPostgrad Med
Source: Postgrad Med 1984;75(5):191-8
Evidence

A retrospective analysis of modification of the flexor tendon transfer for correction of hammer toe

Level IV
Kuwada GTJ Foot Surg
Source: J Foot Surg 1988;27(1):57-9
Evidence

The pathogenesis and surgical management of foot deformity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Level V
Guyton GP, Mann RAFoot Ankle Clin
Source: Foot Ankle Clin 2000;5(2):317-26
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.