Terminal extensor tendon disruption at the DIP joint — splinting first, fixation only when the joint has subluxated | intermediate
Surgical Imaging

The trap: Operating on a bony mallet purely because the dorsal fragment looks large. Fragment size on its own does not predict outcome.
The fix: On a true lateral DIP radiograph, look specifically for volar (palmar) subluxation of the distal phalanx. It is the disordered, subluxated joint — together with a large dorsal fragment — that drives the decision to operate, not the fragment in isolation.
The rule: Splintage must be CONTINUOUS, day and night. If the patient removes the splint and the DIP flexes even once — including during washing — the entire 6 to 8 week count starts over.
The fix: Teach skin care with the finger held flat and the DIP supported on a table so the tip never drops. Audit concordance at every clinic visit; a single break means restarting.
The risk: Holding the DIP in marked hyperextension, or a splint that is too tight, can devascularise the thin dorsal skin over the DIP, producing blistering and full-thickness necrosis.
The fix: Splint in SLIGHT hyperextension only; pad bony prominences; review the skin within the first week and at each splint change. Skin blanching on extension means the angle is too great.
The risk: A longitudinal K-wire crossing the DIP can injure the germinal or sterile nail matrix, producing a deformed nail. A tight dorsal splint can pressure the eponychial fold.
The fix: When transfixing the DIP, pass the wire along the axis that avoids the nail matrix and keep the entry point clear of the eponychium. Keep splints off the proximal nail fold.
Why it happens: A chronic mallet leaves the terminal tendon lax; extensor force is transmitted proximally to the central slip through the lateral bands, producing PIP hyperextension and a DIP flexion lag.
The fix: Prevent it by achieving and maintaining DIP extension early. An established swan-neck may be managed with a figure-of-eight splint, or in severe symptomatic cases with PIP stabilisation such as a superficialis tenodesis.
The trap: Treating an open (laceration) mallet as a routine closed Type I injury with splintage alone.
The fix: An open injury is a different problem. It needs wound lavage and debridement, direct terminal-tendon repair, and usually a longitudinal K-wire across the DIP to hold extension for about 6 weeks while the tendon heals.
M.A.L.L.E.TMALLET — Assessment and Management
S.P.L.I.N.TSPLINT — Principles of Extension Splinting
Definition and Mechanism
A mallet finger is a disruption of the terminal extensor tendon at its insertion on the dorsal base of the distal phalanx, at the DIP joint. The hallmark is loss of active DIP extension with preserved passive extension. The classic mechanism is a sudden forced flexion force applied to an actively extended fingertip — the ball-strike injury that gives it the nickname baseball finger. A direct blow to the dorsum of the DIP or a laceration can also produce it.
The lesion may be:
- Tendinous (soft-tissue) mallet — rupture of the terminal tendon itself
- Bony mallet — avulsion of a fragment of the dorsal base of the distal phalanx with the tendon still attached to it
Doyle Classification
- Description
- Closed, soft-tissue (tendinous), with or without a tiny avulsion fragment
- Typical Management
- Continuous extension splinting
- Description
- Laceration, tendon continuity preserved or lost
- Typical Management
- Surgical repair
- Description
- Deep abrasion with loss of skin, subcutaneous tissue and tendon substance
- Typical Management
- Surgical repair, often soft-tissue cover
- Description
- Paediatric — transepiphyseal fracture (Salter-Harris pattern)
- Typical Management
- Closed reduction and splinting if displaced
- Description
- Bony fragment of intermediate size, NO volar subluxation
- Typical Management
- Trial of continuous splinting
- Description
- Large bony fragment WITH volar (palmar) subluxation of the distal phalanx
- Typical Management
- Operative fixation
Indications for Treatment
Non-operative (the mainstay)
- All closed soft-tissue (tendinous) mallets — Doyle Type I
- Most bony mallets, including those with a substantial fragment, provided the joint is congruent (no volar subluxation)
- Delayed presentation — even weeks to months old — still warrants a trial of continuous splinting
Operative indications (selective)
- A large bony fragment involving more than approximately one third of the articular surface WITH volar (palmar) subluxation of the distal phalanx — the subluxated, unstable joint is the real indication
- Open injuries — Doyle Types II and III (laceration or tissue loss)
- A subset of failures of a genuine, concordant trial of splinting
- Selected paediatric transepiphyseal fractures that are significantly displaced
Relative / cautious indications
- A fragment involving approximately one third or more of the surface WITHOUT subluxation is increasingly managed non-operatively, because the evidence shows fragment size alone does not dictate outcome
- Avoid operating simply for cosmesis of a dorsally prominent fragment
Continuous Splinting versus Operative Fixation
Evidence Base
- Cochrane systematic review: randomised trial evidence for treating mallet finger is limited and insufficient to determine the single best treatment; no trial has shown surgery to be superior to conservative splinting for the typical closed injury.
- Wehbe and Schneider (1984): in a landmark review of mallet fractures, the size of the fracture fragment did not correlate with the clinical result, supporting conservative management of most bony mallets.
- Crawford (1984): the molded polyethylene splint (the basis of the Stack-type splint) holds the DIP in extension while allowing skin care, improving patient concordance — the principle that underpins modern non-operative management.
- Operative series: extension-block (Ishiguro) pinning and ORIF are reported to give good reduction and outcome in bony mallets with volar subluxation, but they are reserved for the minority with an unstable joint.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 28-year-old cricketer was struck on the tip of his right ring finger by a ball two days ago. He cannot straighten the end of his finger, but he can bend it normally and passive extension of the DIP is full. A true lateral radiograph shows no fracture and a congruent DIP joint. What is your management?”
“A 42-year-old labourer injured his middle finger a week ago. He cannot extend the DIP. A true lateral radiograph shows a bony mallet with a dorsal fragment involving approximately half of the articular surface and clear volar (palmar) subluxation of the distal phalanx. How do you manage him, and what operation would you offer?”
“A 60-year-old man presents with a mallet deformity of his index finger that he thinks happened about three months ago. He never sought treatment. He now has a DIP extension lag with early PIP hyperextension — a developing swan-neck posture. The joint is congruent on radiograph. What is your management?”