Tarsal Navicular Fracture ORIF

Foot & AnkleAdvancedCore Procedure

Tarsal Navicular Fracture ORIF

Open reduction and internal fixation of tarsal navicular fractures — Sangeorzan body fractures, tuberosity avulsions, and high-risk stress fractures in athletes — recognising the navicular as the keystone of the medial longitudinal arch and its watershed central blood supply that predisposes to avascular necrosis and nonunion

High-yield overview

Open reduction and internal fixation of navicular body, tuberosity and stress fractures | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Tarsal navicular fracture screw fixation
Tarsal navicular fracture fixed with two compression screws, restoring the medial column.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Dangers and Exam Traps — Navicular ORIF
Watershed central blood supply — AVN and nonunion

The trap: Treating the navicular like a long bone — assuming the central fragment will heal if the cortices are opposed. The central third is the relatively avascular watershed zone between the dorsal/lateral and medial (tuberosity) vascular inputs.

The fix: Minimise stripping of the dorsal and medial soft-tissue attachments during exposure; preserve the capsular attachments to the main fragments. For comminuted central defects use bone graft. Protect with strict non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks — premature loading of the central zone drives nonunion.

Dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve

Location: On the dorsum of the foot the dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve run together between the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) tendons, crossing the proximal navicular and talonavicular joint.

Risk: Any dorsal incision that strays lateral to the EHL threatens this bundle. Palpate (or use Doppler) the dorsalis pedis pre-operatively and document it; keep the dorsomedial incision between the tibialis anterior and EHL, staying medial to the bundle, and protect it with a retractor on the EHL.

Superficial peroneal nerve — medial dorsal cutaneous branch

Location: The superficial peroneal nerve divides into the medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous branches, which run subcutaneously across the dorsum of the foot. The medial dorsal cutaneous nerve crosses the navicular region.

Risk: It lies immediately deep to the skin and is easily transected when raising flaps in a dorsal or dorsomedial approach. Identify and protect it, make the skin incision sharply down to it, and develop flaps in the deep subcutaneous plane. Neuroma of this nerve is a miserable complication.

Stress fracture occult on plain X-ray

The trap: Reassuring an athlete with dorsal midfoot pain because the radiograph looks normal. Early and many established navicular stress fractures are invisible on plain films.

The fix: Maintain a high index of suspicion. The clinical clue is focal tenderness over the dorsal navicular (the N spot). When suspected, request CT to define a fracture line, or MRI to detect stress response/oedema before a frank line appears. Do not discharge on a normal radiograph alone.

Accessory navicular vs acute tuberosity avulsion

Accessory navicular (os tibiale externum): Bilateral in most cases, smooth and corticated margins, rounded, sits at the posterior tibial tendon insertion, often painless or chronically symptomatic.

Acute avulsion: Sharp, unilateral margins, acute focal tenderness, often after forced eversion against a contracting tibialis posterior. Image the contralateral foot — bilateral smooth-corticated fragments favour an accessory navicular rather than a fresh avulsion.

Medial arch keystone — malunion causes flatfoot

The trap: Accepting a reduction that looks adequate on the fracture line but has shortened the medial column or left a talonavicular/naviculocuneiform step-off.

The fix: Judge reduction by articular congruity of BOTH the talonavicular and naviculocuneiform surfaces and by restoration of medial column length and arch height, confirmed on intra-operative fluoroscopy (AP, oblique and lateral). A shortened column heals into a painful post-traumatic flatfoot that is hard to reconstruct secondarily.

Mnemonic

N.A.V.I.C.U.L.A.RNAVICULAR — anatomy, blood supply and operative principles

Mnemonic

S.T.R.E.S.SSTRESS — navicular stress fracture assessment

Mnemonic

D.O.R.S.A.LDORSAL — the operative approach and its dangers

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Displaced intra-articular body fracture with articular step-off greater than 2 mm on the talonavicular or naviculocuneiform surface
  • Open navicular fracture — urgent debridement and skeletal stabilisation
  • Fracture-dislocation of the midfoot (Chopart involvement) with navicular displacement
  • Displaced complete stress fracture (Saxena Type III) through the plantar cortex, or any complete stress fracture that has failed a trial of strict non-weight-bearing
  • Large displaced tuberosity avulsion (greater than 5 mm) with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, or symptomatic nonunion

Relative Indications

  • Sangeorzan Type II body fracture with lesser but functionally significant displacement in a high-demand patient
  • Comminuted Type III fracture where primary stable fixation is preferred over prolonged casting
  • Athlete with a complete (Saxena III) stress fracture requesting the earliest reliable return to sport, after counselling on operative versus non-operative trade-offs
  • Symptomatic painful accessory navicular (Type II) refractory to non-operative care, with or without avulsion of the accessory fragment

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Medically unfit for anaesthesia
  • Active deep infection at the surgical site (other than an open fracture requiring debridement)
  • A non-displaced stress or body fracture that will predictably unite with strict non-weight-bearing — surgery adds risk without benefit

Relative:

  • Peripheral vascular disease or diabetes with neuropathy — elevated wound and nonunion risk; optimise and counsel
  • Severe comminution where fixation is non-viable — consider external fixation or primary arthrodesis of the involved column
  • Tobacco use — elevated nonunion risk; advise cessation before elective fixation

Classification

Sangeorzan Classification — Body Fractures

The operative planning framework for displaced intra-articular navicular body fractures.

Sangeorzan body fracture classification

Saxena Classification — Stress Fractures

Stratifies navicular stress fractures by completeness and guides operative decision-making.

Saxena stress fracture classification

Evidence for Non-Operative Treatment

Non-displaced body fractures

  • Undisplaced or minimally displaced navicular body fractures unite reliably in a non-weight-bearing cast or boot for 6 weeks, followed by a graduated return to weight-bearing.
  • Serial radiographs monitor for secondary displacement and arch collapse, which mandate conversion to ORIF.

Partial stress fractures (Saxena I and II)

  • Strict non-weight-bearing in a cast or boot for 6 weeks is the foundation. Plain radiographs are frequently normal, so CT or MRI is used to confirm healing.
  • Return to sport is graduated and typically takes 4 to 6 months; premature return risks propagation to a complete fracture.

Tuberosity avulsion

  • Minimally displaced avulsions are managed symptomatically in a boot or cast for 4 to 6 weeks with the foot plantigrade.

Operative versus non-operative — by fracture type


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 22-year-old elite middle-distance runner presents with six weeks of insidious dorsal midfoot pain that is worse with running and eased by rest. Plain radiographs are normal. On examination there is focal tenderness over the dorsal central navicular. A CT confirms a complete navicular stress fracture through the central third extending to the plantar cortex, without displacement. How do you manage her?

Practical approach
This is a complete (Saxena Type III) navicular stress fracture in the central avascular watershed zone of an elite athlete. A normal radiograph is typical and does not change the diagnosis once CT has confirmed a complete fracture line. Because complete stress fractures are nonunion-prone and she is an elite athlete aiming for the earliest reliable return, I would recommend surgical fixation, after counselling her fully on operative versus non-operative options. **Non-operative option**: strict non-weight-bearing in a cast or boot for six weeks with CT surveillance, then graduated loading. This is reasonable but carries a meaningful nonunion rate and a longer, less predictable return to sport — often four to six months — in a complete fracture. **Operative option**: percutaneous or mini-open compression screw fixation across the central fracture line, with minimal dorsal soft-tissue stripping to protect the watershed blood supply. This is associated with a lower nonunion rate and a more reliable, often earlier, return to sport for complete fractures. **My recommendation**: fixation. Pre-operatively I would assess the pulses and dorsal sensation, document the neurovascular status, and image the contralateral foot to exclude bilateral stress fractures. I would also screen for and correct predisposing factors — training load, footwear, relative energy deficiency in sport, and vitamin D status — because these drive recurrence regardless of fixation. **Post-operative plan**: strict non-weight-bearing for six weeks, a CT at eight to twelve weeks to confirm bridging before unrestricted loading, and a graduated return-to-run programme over six to eight weeks after clearance. I would not allow return to sprinting or plyometrics until she is pain-free on examination AND the CT shows bridging. **Long-term**: recurrence prevention is the other half of management — load management and correction of any energy-deficiency state are as important as the fixation itself.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 40-year-old man sustains a high-energy midfoot injury in a motorcycle crash. CT shows a comminuted displaced fracture of the navicular body with disruption of the talonavicular and naviculocuneiform articular surfaces and shortening of the medial column — a Sangeorzan Type III pattern. The overlying skin is intact but badly contused. Talk me through your operative plan.

Practical approach
This is a displaced comminuted Sangeorzan Type III navicular body fracture with medial column shortening and involvement of both articular surfaces. The contused soft-tissue envelope governs timing as much as the fracture pattern. **Timing and soft-tissue management**: The dorsal skin is thin and badly contused. I would not perform definitive ORIF through swollen, blistered skin. I would apply a well-padded splint, elevate the limb, and either wait for the wrinkle sign to return or, if the column is shortened and unstable, apply a temporary spanning external fixator across the medial column to maintain length and rest the soft tissues. Definitive fixation follows once the envelope recovers, typically five to ten days later. **Approach**: A dorsomedial longitudinal incision between the tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus tendons, staying medial to the dorsalis pedis and deep peroneal nerve bundle. I would identify and protect the medial dorsal cutaneous branch of the superficial peroneal nerve, raise full-thickness flaps, and expose both the talonavicular and naviculocuneiform joints. **Reduction**: The reduction target is restoration of BOTH articular surfaces and medial column length — I reconstruct the navicular to fit the talar head proximally and the cuneiforms distally, holding each fragment with K-wires and checking arch height and column length on the lateral fluoroscan. In a comminuted pattern I accept anatomic articular reconstruction over anatomic fragment position. **Fixation**: A lag screw alone would shorten a comminuted column, so I would use a dorsomedial mini-fragment neutralisation or bridge plate, with interfragmentary lag screws where the pattern allows, and back-fill the central defect with cancellous bone graft to support the avascular zone. **When fixation is non-viable**: If the navicular is unreconstructable, I would consider a primary arthrodesis of the destroyed joint rather than leaving a collapsed, painful midfoot — but I would discuss this possibility with the patient beforehand. **Closure and aftercare**: Layered closure over the protected nerves, a posterior splint, and strict non-weight-bearing for six weeks with a CT at eight to twelve weeks to confirm union before loading. I would warn the patient that post-traumatic arthritis and hardware removal are likely in the medium term.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 16-year-old boy presents after a fall with acute medial midfoot pain. A radiograph shows a separate ossicle at the navicular tuberosity. His mother asks whether he has broken a bone. How do you decide between an acute avulsion fracture and an accessory navicular, and how does it change management?

Practical approach
The key distinction is between an acute avulsion of the navicular tuberosity by the posterior tibial tendon and a pre-existing accessory navicular (os tibiale externum), and it rests on morphology, bilaterality and the clinical context. **Acute avulsion**: a sharp, irregular, unilateral fragment at the tibialis posterior insertion, with acute focal tenderness and often a mechanism of forced eversion against a contracting tibialis posterior. There may be posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. **Accessory navicular**: a separate ossicle at the tibialis posterior insertion, present in a minority of people and bilateral in most. It has smooth, corticated, rounded margins — a chronic developmental variant rather than a fresh fracture. It may be asymptomatic or chronically symptomatic. **How I decide**: I examine the radiograph morphology (sharp versus smooth-corticated and rounded), assess the clinical story and focal tenderness, and critically I image the contralateral foot — a bilateral smooth-corticated fragment at the same site strongly favours an accessory navicular rather than a fresh avulsion. **Management**: For an acute avulsion displaced less than 5 mm, I treat symptomatically in a boot or cast for four to six weeks with the foot plantigrade; most unite or become asymptomatic. For a fragment displaced greater than 5 mm, or a symptomatic nonunion, I offer ORIF with a lag screw or tension band and repair of the tibialis posterior insertion to bone. For a painful accessory navicular that has failed a reasonable period of non-operative care (orthosis, activity modification), the operation is excision of the accessory fragment with advancement of the tibialis posterior tendon (the Kidner procedure) — not fixation of a fracture. **Counselling**: I would reassure the family that an accessory navicular is a common, normal variant and explain the difference between treating a fresh fracture and managing a symptomatic accessory ossicle.
Exam day cheat sheet
Tarsal Navicular Fracture ORIF — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Displaced intraarticular fractures of the tarsal navicular

Level IV
Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK, Mosca V, Mayo KA, Hansen STJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: The Sangeorzan classification remains the operative planning framework for navicular body fractures; ORIF is indicated for displaced fractures to restore joint congruity and medial column alignment.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(10):1504-10
Evidence

Results of treatment of 22 navicular stress fractures and a new proposed classification

Level IV
Saxena A, Fullem B, Hannaford DJ Foot Ankle Surg
Clinical implication: Use the Saxena classification to stratify navicular stress fractures: partial dorsal cortical injuries may be managed non-operatively, while complete fractures warrant surgical fixation.
Source: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39(2):96-103
Evidence

Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular: a retrospective review of twenty-one cases

Level IV
Torg JS, Pavlov H, Cooley LH, Bryant MH, Arnoczky SP, Bergfeld J, Hunter LYJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Suspect a navicular stress fracture in an athlete with dorsal midfoot pain even with normal radiographs; image with CT or MRI and protect the central avascular zone.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(5):700-12
Evidence

Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes

Level III
Khan KM, Fuller PJ, Brukner PD, Kearney C, Burry HCAm J Sports Med
Clinical implication: For complete navicular stress fractures in athletes, surgical fixation is a reasonable option to reduce time to union and accelerate return to sport; non-operative care requires strict non-weight-bearing.
Source: Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(6):657-66
Evidence

Injuries of the midtarsal joint

Level IV
Main BJ, Jowett RLJ Bone Joint Surg Br
Clinical implication: Navicular fractures are not isolated injuries — they threaten the integrity of the medial column; restoration of navicular position and arch height is central to a good outcome.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57(1):89-97
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.