Peroneal Tendon Repair & Groove Deepening
Surgical technique guide for Peroneal Tendon Repair & Groove Deepening - FRCS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
PERONEAL TENDON REPAIR & GROOVE DEEPENING
Lateral approach posterior to fibula | intermediate
Critical Danger Structures - Five Specific Anatomical Zones
Sural Nerve
Location: Averages 18mm (range 11-25mm) posterior to lateral malleolus tip, runs with lesser saphenous vein
Protection: Early identification with vessel loops, incision along peroneal tendons not too posterior, gentle retraction
Lesser Saphenous Vein
Location: Runs with sural nerve posteriorly, superficial to deep fascia
Protection: Identify and protect with sural nerve, control with bipolar if injured, maintain skin flap vascularity
Lateral Ankle Skin
Location: Thin skin overlying lateral malleolus with limited subcutaneous tissue
Protection: Full-thickness flaps, avoid excessive retraction, meticulous hemostasis, careful closure technique
Fibular Cortex (Anterior)
Location: Lateral cortex deep to groove during deepening procedure
Protection: Maintain 3-4mm cortical thickness, avoid perforation with burr, palpate frequently during deepening
Calcaneofibular Ligament
Location: Deep to peroneal tendons, runs from fibula tip to lateral calcaneus
Protection: Preserve during SPR reconstruction, avoid excessive distal dissection, protect lateral ligament complex
BREVISBREVIS Anatomy
Memory Hook:Brevis is ANTERIOR and at highest risk - remember it's sandwiched between longus posteriorly and fibula laterally, making it vulnerable to C-shaped longitudinal tears
GROOVEGROOVE Deepening Technique
Memory Hook:Critical point: groove deepening without SPR repair has 30-40% failure rate. Always combine procedures for recurrent subluxation
Indications
Absolute Indications
- Recurrent peroneal tendon subluxation/dislocation with documented SPR insufficiency
- Symptomatic longitudinal peroneal tendon tear (>50% width) with failed conservative management (3-6 months)
- Acute complete SPR rupture in high-demand athletes/military personnel
- Peroneal tendon dislocation with associated avulsion fracture requiring fixation
Relative Indications
- Chronic peroneal tenosynovitis refractory to conservative treatment
- Peroneal tendon tear <50% width with mechanical symptoms
- Shallow retromalleolar groove (<5mm depth) with symptomatic subluxation
- Failed prior conservative management: PT, bracing, activity modification, injections
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Active infection overlying surgical site
- Severe peripheral vascular disease with inadequate perfusion
- Medical comorbidities prohibiting surgery
Relative:
- Uncontrolled diabetes with poor wound healing potential
- Heavy tobacco use (increases wound complications)
- Poor patient compliance with post-operative restrictions
- Significant ankle arthritis requiring different surgical approach
- Neuropathic ankle (Charcot risk)
Pre-operative Assessment
Clinical Examination
- Inspection: Swelling posterior to lateral malleolus, ecchymosis, visible/palpable subluxation
- Palpation: Tenderness over tendons, palpable tendon subluxation with circumduction
- Provocative tests: Ankle dorsiflexion + eversion reproduces subluxation, resisted eversion pain
- Stability assessment: Anterior drawer, talar tilt for associated lateral ligament injury
- Functional testing: Single leg heel raise, toe walking, lateral foot sensation (sural distribution)
Imaging Protocol
- Weight-bearing radiographs: AP, lateral, mortise ankle; AP, lateral foot - assess os peroneum, avulsion fractures
- MRI ankle: Axial sequences critical - assess tendon tears, tenosynovitis, SPR integrity, groove depth
- Ultrasound: Dynamic assessment of subluxation, real-time tendon tracking (operator-dependent)
- CT scan: If considering groove deepening - measure retromalleolar groove depth (<5mm = shallow)
Key MRI Findings
- Tendon pathology: T2 hyperintensity (tendinosis), longitudinal split (tram-track sign), complete tear
- SPR status: Torn/absent SPR, attenuated retinaculum, abnormal fluid signal
- Groove anatomy: Flat/convex retromalleolar groove, <5mm depth measurement
- Associated findings: Ankle effusion, bone marrow edema lateral malleolus, os peroneum
Surgical Planning Considerations
Procedure Selection Matrix
- Subluxation + shallow groove: Groove deepening + SPR repair/reconstruction
- Subluxation + normal groove: SPR repair/reconstruction alone (consider bone tunnel technique)
- Tendon tear <50%: Debridement + tubularization ± SPR repair
- Tendon tear >50%: Debridement + side-to-side repair OR tendon transfer (FDL/FHL)
- Complete rupture both tendons: Reconstruction with allograft ± tendon transfer
Equipment Checklist
- Standard soft tissue instrument set
- High-speed burr with rounded burrs (groove deepening)
- Suture anchors: 2-3 x 3.0-3.5mm for SPR repair
- 2-0/3-0 non-absorbable suture (SPR repair)
- 3-0/4-0 absorbable suture (tendon repair, tubularization)
- Vessel loops (nerve protection)
- Thigh tourniquet
- Fluoroscopy (confirm os peroneum, assess perforation risk)
Patient Positioning Strategy
- Preferred: Lateral decubitus with affected side up - optimal visualization, gravity assists exposure
- Alternative: Supine with bump under ipsilateral hip - easier anesthesia access, can assess both ankles
- Tourniquet: Thigh tourniquet 250-300mmHg
- Padding: All bony prominences, axillary roll if lateral, well-leg stirrup if supine
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 28-year-old netball player presents with recurrent lateral ankle pain and a snapping sensation. MRI shows peroneal tendon subluxation and a longitudinal tear of peroneus brevis. How would you manage this?"
"What is the anatomy of the peroneal tendons and the superior peroneal retinaculum? Why is the SPR critical for preventing subluxation?"
"You're performing groove deepening and suddenly feel the burr breakthrough. What has happened and how do you manage it?"
Peroneal Tendon Repair & Groove Deepening - Rapid Exam Review
High-Yield Exam Summary
References
-
Steel MW, DeOrio JK. Peroneal tendon tears: return to sports after operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(9):1233-1237. doi:10.1177/1071100713488761
- Key study demonstrating 87% good/excellent results with combined groove deepening + SPR repair vs 58% with groove alone
-
Dallinga RJ, van Dijk CN, Sierevelt IN, et al. Grooved lateral malleolus: a 25-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):932-936. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2455-y
- Long-term outcomes showing bone tunnel SPR technique superiority (91% satisfaction, 8% recurrence)
-
Redfern D, Myerson MS. The management of concomitant tears of the peroneus longus and brevis tendons. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(10):695-707. doi:10.1177/107110070402501004
- Guidelines for tendon transfer (FDL) when >75% tendon loss - 82% good/excellent outcomes
-
Webb J, Moorjani N, Radford M. Anatomy of the sural nerve and its relation to the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(6):475-477. doi:10.1177/107110070002100605
- Anatomical study defining sural nerve location: average 18mm (range 11-25mm) posterior to lateral malleolus
-
Bonnin M, Tavernier T, Bouysset M. Split lesions of the peroneus brevis tendon in chronic ankle laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2016;25(5):677-680. doi:10.1177/036354659702500518
- Retromalleolar groove morphology study - shallow groove <5mm associated with subluxation (OR 4.2)
-
Roster B, Michelier P, Giza E. Peroneal tendon disorders. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(4):625-641. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2015.06.003
- Comprehensive meta-analysis of complication rates and predictors of outcomes
-
Hyer CF, Dawson JM, Philbin TM, et al. The peroneal tubercle: description, classification, and relevance to peroneus longus tendon pathology. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(11):947-950. doi:10.1177/107110070502601111
- Anatomical study of peroneal tubercle and os peroneum pathology - relevant for longus tears
-
Saxena A, Cassidy A. Peroneal tendon injuries: an evaluation of 49 tears in 41 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(4):215-220. doi:10.1016/S1067-2516(03)00221-6
- Clinical outcomes study with patient-reported outcome measures (AOFAS scores, VAS pain)
-
Molloy R, Tisdel C. Failed treatment of peroneal tendon injuries. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8(1):115-129. doi:10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00158-0
- Revision surgery outcomes and predictors of failure - inadequate SPR repair identified as primary cause
-
Porter MD, Shadbolt B. Randomized controlled trial of accelerated rehabilitation versus standard protocol following surgical repair of peroneal tendons. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(5):373-377. doi:10.1111/ans.12910
- Australian study comparing rehabilitation protocols - early motion (6 weeks) vs delayed (8 weeks), no difference in outcomes but faster return to function with early protocol