Foot & Ankle

Peroneal Tendon Repair/Reconstruction

Surgical technique guide for Peroneal Tendon Repair/Reconstruction - FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

PERONEAL TENDON REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION

Direct posterolateral approach to fibula along course of peroneal tendons | advanced

Critical Danger Structures - SPECIFIC ANATOMICAL LOCATIONS

Sural Nerve

Location: Runs with lesser saphenous vein in subcutaneous tissue, 1-2cm POSTERIOR to lateral malleolus

Protection: Identify early during superficial dissection, tag with vessel loop, retract posteriorly throughout case

Lateral Calcaneal Sensory Branches

Location: Branch from sural nerve approximately 6-8cm proximal to lateral malleolus, course toward heel

Protection: Preserve during subcutaneous dissection, gentle retraction if encountered

Calcaneofibular Ligament (CFL)

Location: Deep to peroneal tendons, runs from fibular tip to lateral calcaneus at 45-degree angle

Protection: Avoid excessive dissection anterior to tendons, preserve during SPR reconstruction and groove deepening

Peroneal Artery

Location: Lies deep to peroneal tendons in posterior compartment, approximately 2-3cm anterior to fibula at proximal exposure

Protection: Limit deep dissection anterior to tendons, stay within tendon sheath plane

Fibular Posterior Cortex

Location: Thin posterior cortical wall of distal fibula - can be violated during aggressive groove deepening

Protection: Deepening to 4-5mm only, avoid penetrating anterior cortex, preserve structural integrity

Mnemonic

BREVISBREVIS - Longitudinal Split Tear Assessment

Mnemonic

SURALSURAL - Protecting the Sural Nerve

Indications

Primary Indications for Peroneal Tendon Surgery

Tendon Tears:

  • Peroneal brevis longitudinal split tears with >50% tendon involvement
  • Complete or partial rupture of peroneal brevis or longus
  • Failed conservative management (3-6 months) for symptomatic tears
  • Acute complete ruptures in young athletic patients

Peroneal Subluxation/Dislocation:

  • Symptomatic peroneal tendon subluxation/dislocation
  • Superior Peroneal Retinaculum (SPR) insufficiency or rupture
  • Shallow fibular groove (<2mm depth) with recurrent subluxation
  • Failed conservative management with bracing/physical therapy

Combined Pathology:

  • Peroneal tendinosis with >50% tendon degeneration requiring debridement
  • Concurrent lateral ankle instability requiring combined reconstruction
  • Os peroneum fracture with peroneus longus rupture
  • Revision cases after failed prior repair

Contraindications:

  • Active infection
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Inadequate soft tissue envelope
  • Medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Patient unwilling to comply with postoperative restrictions

Preoperative Planning

Clinical Assessment:

  • History: Lateral ankle pain, weakness, sensation of snapping/popping with activity
  • Mechanism: Acute dorsiflexion/eversion injury (subluxation) vs chronic repetitive microtrauma (tears)
  • Physical exam: Palpate tendons for subluxation (reproduce with active eversion/dorsiflexion), tenderness at fibular tip, lateral ankle stability testing (anterior drawer, talar tilt)

Imaging:

  • Radiographs: AP, lateral, mortise views - assess for os peroneum, shallow fibular groove, ankle arthritis
  • MRI: ESSENTIAL for surgical planning - identify tear pattern (longitudinal vs rupture), degree of tendinosis, SPR status, fibular groove morphology, measure tendon quality/cross-sectional area
  • Ultrasound: Dynamic assessment of subluxation if available

Surgical Planning:

  • Determine repair vs reconstruction based on MRI (>50% involvement = augmentation)
  • Assess for concurrent lateral ankle instability (combined procedure)
  • Identify tear location (fibular tip vs os peroneum vs cuboid tunnel)
  • Plan for FDL harvest if reconstruction likely
  • Consent for possible allograft if tissue inadequate

Patient Counseling:

  • Success rate 85-90% for repairs, 80-85% for subluxation reconstruction
  • Sural nerve numbness risk 5-15%
  • Return to sport 4-6 months
  • Immobilization and restricted weight-bearing requirements

Complications - Comprehensive Management

Major Complications: Recognition, Prevention, and Management

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 32-year-old basketball player presents with lateral ankle pain and recurrent popping sensation. Describe your diagnostic approach and how you would decide between repair versus reconstruction."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is classic for peroneal pathology with possible subluxation. My diagnostic approach would be systematic. First, history: I would ask about mechanism - acute inversion injury with pop suggests SPR rupture and subluxation, while chronic lateral pain suggests peroneal tendinopathy or tears. I'd ask if they feel snapping or popping with eversion and dorsiflexion - this is pathognomonic for subluxation. On examination, I would palpate the peroneal tendons along the fibular groove, checking for tenderness, swelling, or palpable subluxation. I would perform the peroneal subluxation test - active dorsiflexion and eversion while palpating the tendons - feeling for subluxation anterior to the fibula. I'd also assess lateral ankle stability with anterior drawer and talar tilt tests, as 30-50% have concurrent instability. For imaging, AP, lateral, and mortise radiographs to assess for os peroneum, shallow fibular groove, or ankle arthritis. MRI is essential for surgical planning - it identifies tear pattern (longitudinal split vs rupture), degree of tendon involvement (critical for determining repair vs reconstruction), tendinosis severity, SPR integrity, and fibular groove morphology. The decision between repair and reconstruction depends primarily on the extent of tendon involvement and tissue quality. Primary repair is appropriate when less than 50% of the tendon cross-section is involved and tissue quality is good - the tendon appears pink, firm, and of normal caliber. In this scenario, tubularization with side-to-side repair using running locked stitch provides excellent results. However, reconstruction with FDL transfer is required when more than 50% of the tendon is involved, when tissue quality is poor - appearing grey, friable, or attenuated - or when there is complete rupture with inadequate tissue for primary repair. The FDL transfer is the gold standard for reconstruction with 85-90% success rates. If subluxation is the primary issue, I would focus on SPR reconstruction with direct repair using suture anchors, and consider groove deepening if the fibular groove is shallow (less than 2mm depth on MRI).
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You're performing peroneal tendon repair and identify a longitudinal split tear involving 60% of the peroneus brevis. Walk me through your surgical management and technical decision-making."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
A 60% longitudinal split exceeds the threshold for primary repair and requires augmentation. First, I would fully assess the extent of the tear by opening the tendon sheath from proximal to distal, typically 10-12cm, and performing synovectomy to improve visualization. I would confirm that the tear involves more than 50% of the cross-section - measuring the width of the tear compared to the intact portion. I would assess tissue quality by inspecting color (healthy is pink, degenerate is grey), consistency (healthy is firm, degenerate is friable), and caliber. I would also check the peroneus longus for tears, as both tendons can be injured. Given the 60% involvement, I would proceed with FDL transfer for augmentation - this is the gold standard reconstruction. My technique would be: First, debride the brevis back to healthy bleeding tissue edges - removing all grey, degenerate tissue. Then, make a separate 3-4cm medial incision posterior to the medial malleolus to harvest the FDL. I would carefully identify the neurovascular bundle (posterior tibial nerve and artery) and protect it. The FDL is posterior to the FHL and anterior to the Achilles - I would identify it based on these landmarks. I would harvest the FDL with adequate length by dividing it distally and retrieving it proximally. Back on the lateral side, I would prepare for reconstruction. I have two main options for fixation: create a 5mm bone tunnel in the distal fibula posterior to the lateral malleolus, or use a 3.0-3.5mm suture anchor. I would weave the FDL through and around the remaining healthy peroneal brevis tissue to maximize contact surface area. Then pass the FDL through the bone tunnel or secure it with the suture anchor. Critical step: I would tension the FDL with the ankle in neutral position, comparing eversion strength to the contralateral side - too tight restricts motion, too loose provides weak eversion. I would tenodese the FDL to the remaining peroneal tissue with multiple interrupted sutures using 2-0 absorbable suture. Before proceeding, I would test the reconstruction intraoperatively: check that the augmented tendon glides smoothly in the fibular groove without catching, verify that eversion strength is restored, and ensure full ankle ROM. I would also assess the SPR - if torn, it would need reconstruction, and I would check the fibular groove depth - if shallow (less than 2mm), I might consider groove deepening to prevent future impingement.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"During peroneal tendon surgery, you encounter brisk bleeding from what appears to be the peroneal artery. Describe your immediate management and how you prevent this complication."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Peroneal artery injury is a serious but fortunately rare complication. My immediate management would focus on hemorrhage control and vascular assessment. First, I would apply direct pressure with a surgical sponge or laparotomy pad to achieve temporary hemostasis. I would request immediate availability of vascular instruments including vascular clamps, if not already on the table. With an assistant maintaining pressure, I would obtain proximal and distal control of the vessel. The peroneal artery lies deep to the peroneal tendons in the posterior compartment, approximately 2-3cm anterior to the fibula in the proximal exposure area. Once I have the field under control, I would assess the extent of the injury - is it a small branch vessel that can be ligated, or is it the main peroneal artery? For small perforating branches, bipolar cautery or suture ligation with 4-0 absorbable suture is typically sufficient. However, if the main peroneal artery is injured, I need to make a critical decision. I would assess the patient's vascular status preoperatively (any known PVD, diabetes, smoking history) and the status of the other vessels (posterior tibial and anterior tibial arteries). In most patients with intact tibial vessels, the peroneal artery can be ligated without consequence as there is adequate collateral flow through the posterior tibial and anterior tibial systems. I would ligate the vessel proximally and distally with 2-0 or 3-0 non-absorbable sutures (silk or prolene). However, if the patient has known PVD, the vessel is the dominant blood supply, or I have any concern about foot perfusion, I would strongly consider vascular surgery consultation for potential repair versus bypass. After achieving hemostasis, I would carefully check pedal pulses - dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial - and assess capillary refill. If there is any concern about perfusion, I would obtain intraoperative Doppler assessment and potentially angiography. Prevention is obviously preferable. The key is to stay within the correct surgical plane. The peroneal tendons are in the retrofibular space, and my dissection should remain within or immediately adjacent to the tendon sheath. The peroneal artery is deep and anterior to the tendons - I prevent injury by avoiding excessive deep dissection anterior to the tendons. During SPR reconstruction and tendon sheath opening, I work from posterior to anterior, staying in the superficial plane. When placing bone tunnels or anchors in the fibula, I direct them posteriorly, not anteriorly toward the neurovascular structures. I also limit proximal dissection to only what's necessary for the repair or reconstruction. If performing groove deepening, I stay on bone and avoid penetrating the anterior cortex which could injure deeper structures.

Peroneal Tendon Repair/Reconstruction - Gold Standard Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Dombek MF, Lamm BM, Saltrick K, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR. Peroneal tendon tears: a retrospective review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(5):250-258. doi:10.1016/S1067-2516(03)00314-7

  2. Redfern D, Myerson M. The management of concomitant tears of the peroneus longus and brevis tendons. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(10):695-707. doi:10.1177/107110070402501004

  3. Saxena A, Cassidy A. Peroneal tendon injuries: an evaluation of 49 tears in 41 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(4):215-220. doi:10.1016/S1067-2516(03)00150-1

  4. Steel MW, DeOrio JK. Peroneal tendon tears: return to sports after operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):49-54. doi:10.3113/FAI.2007.0009

  5. Philbin TM, Landis GS, Smith B. Peroneal tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(5):306-317. doi:10.5435/00124635-200905000-00005

  6. van Dijk PA, Gianakos AL, Kerkhoffs GM, Kennedy JG. Return to sports and clinical outcomes in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocation: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1155-1164. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3833-3

  7. Demetracopoulos CA, Vineyard JC, Kiesau CD, Nunley JA 2nd. Long-term results of debridement and primary repair of peroneal tendon tears. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):252-257. doi:10.1177/1071100713514565

  8. Heckman DS, Reddy S, Pedowitz D, Wapner KL, Parekh SG. Operative treatment for peroneal tendon disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):404-418. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00965

  9. Roster B, Michelier P, Giza E. Peroneal tendon disorders. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(4):625-641. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2015.06.003

  10. Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Renstrom PA. Subtalar ankle instability: a review. Sports Med. 1997;24(5):337-346. doi:10.2165/00007256-199724050-00005