Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Posterior Pelvic Ring ORIF (Sacral and Crescent Fractures)

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Posterior Pelvic Ring ORIF (Sacral and Crescent Fractures)

Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior pelvic ring for sacral fractures, crescent iliac fractures and SI joint disruptions — posterior and anterior approaches, reduction techniques, spinopelvic fixation and complication management

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Open reduction internal fixation of sacral fractures, crescent iliac fractures and irreducible SI joint disruptions | advanced

traumaSubspecialty
6Operative steps
5Danger zones
180 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Indications for open posterior pelvic ring ORIF include irreducible displacement greater than 1 cm, comminuted sacral fractures with sacral dysmorphism precluding safe iliosacral screw placement, crescent fractures with intra-articular extension, and spinopelvic dissociation patterns (U-type, H-type, T-type) requiring lumbopelvic fixation.
  • The posterior approach to the sacrum and SI joint carries a high risk of wound breakdown (up to 15 to 20 percent in some series) because of thin soft-tissue cover over the sacrum, contamination from the perineum and the frequent presence of degloving injuries (Morel-Lavallée lesions).
  • Danger structures include the L5 nerve root (exits the L5-S1 foramen and crosses the sacral ala 2 cm medial to the SI joint), the S1 and S2 nerve roots within the sacral foramina, and the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle exiting the greater sciatic notch.
  • Fixation constructs must resist vertical shear and rotational forces: tension-band plating, transiliac internal fixators, lumbopelvic constructs with iliac screws or S2-alar-iliac screws, and supplementary iliosacral screws when the corridor is safe.
Clinical Pearls
  • “
    Crescent fractures are iliac-wing fractures that extend into the SI joint; the posterior fragment remains attached to the sacrum via the posterior SI ligaments — reduction often requires direct visualisation of the joint surface.
  • “
    Sacral dysmorphism (present in 30 to 40 percent of patients) alters the safe corridor for iliosacral screws; the upper sacral segment may be too narrow or the alar slope too steep — preoperative CT with coronal and sagittal reformats is mandatory.
  • “
    Spinopelvic dissociation (U/H/T-type sacral fractures) disconnects the lumbar spine from the pelvis; these injuries require lumbopelvic fixation (pedicle screws in L5 and/or L4 plus iliac or S2AI screws) to restore continuity.
  • “
    Wound complications are the leading cause of reoperation after posterior pelvic approaches — meticulous soft-tissue handling, layered closure over drains, and avoidance of direct pressure on the wound postoperatively are critical.

When & Why


Indication. Open posterior pelvic ring ORIF is reserved for unstable posterior ring injuries that cannot be reduced or stabilised percutaneously — irreducible displacement, fractures that defeat safe screw corridors, and dissociation patterns that disconnect the spine from the pelvis. Absolute indications for open posterior ORIF - Irreducible posterior pelvic ring displacement greater than 1 cm after attempted closed reduction

  • Comminuted sacral fractures with sacral dysmorphism that precludes safe percutaneous iliosacral screw placement
  • Crescent fractures with intra-articular SI joint extension or significant displacement
  • Spinopelvic dissociation (U-type, H-type, T-type sacral fractures) with or without neurologic deficit
  • Open pelvic fractures with posterior ring involvement requiring debridement and stabilisation
  • Associated lumbosacral plexus injury requiring direct exploration and decompression Relative indications - Failed percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation with loss of reduction
  • Delayed presentation with malreduction that cannot be corrected percutaneously
  • Poor bone quality requiring augmented fixation (osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease)
  • Concomitant acetabular fracture requiring extensile exposure Contraindications Absolute: - Haemodynamic instability precluding prolonged surgery (damage-control orthopaedics first)
  • Active infection at the surgical site
  • Severe soft-tissue degloving (Morel-Lavallée) not yet debrided and stable Relative: - Patient factors precluding prone positioning (severe pulmonary injury, spinal instability)
  • Anticipated poor wound healing (steroids, smoking, diabetes) — consider staged or percutaneous alternatives Timing and damage-control. Early stabilisation within 72 hours reduces mortality and pulmonary complications in polytrauma patients, but posterior pelvic approaches in the presence of degloving injuries carry high wound complication rates. Many centres therefore favour a staged approach: anterior external fixation or percutaneous anterior ring fixation for resuscitation, serial debridement of Morel-Lavallée lesions, and definitive posterior ORIF once the soft tissues permit — typically 5 to 14 days after injury. Consent. Counsel specifically for neurologic injury (L5 or sacral root, 3 to 8 percent), wound breakdown and infection (10 to 20 percent), hardware prominence requiring later removal (15 to 25 percent), nonunion or malunion (5 to 10 percent), and the likelihood of staged procedures if the soft tissues are compromised.

The Operation


The goal is to reduce the posterior ring under direct vision and fluoroscopy and to stabilise it with a construct matched to the injury pattern — tension-band plating for crescent and rotationally unstable injuries, a transiliac internal fixator when the soft-tissue envelope is poor, and lumbopelvic fixation for spinopelvic dissociation. The exposure below is the heart of the operation: a posterior approach that elevates the gluteus maximus as a flap, protects the sciatic notch contents, and brings the sacral ala and SI joint into view.

Posterior pelvic ring fixation
Posterior pelvic ring fixation with iliosacral screws stabilising the sacrum to the ilium.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, imaging & consent
  • Position: Prone on a radiolucent table with chest rolls and padded prominences; arms abducted less than 90 degrees; slight bilateral hip and knee flexion relaxes the sciatic nerve. A urinary catheter is placed.
  • Anaesthesia: General endotracheal with muscle relaxation for reduction. Consider neuromonitoring (somatosensory and motor evoked potentials) for spinopelvic dissociation cases with neurologic deficit. Arterial line and large-bore venous access are routine.
  • Imaging setup: High-quality C-arm fluoroscopy. Obtain anteroposterior, inlet, outlet and lateral sacral views before incision; add obturator-oblique and iliac-oblique views for iliac screw placement. Consider intraoperative CT or navigation when available.
Step 2Incision & soft-tissue handling
  • A longitudinal incision is made 2 cm lateral to the PSIS, extending from the L4 spinous process to the level of the PIIS (approximately 12 to 15 cm). For bilateral exposure use a single midline or two separate paramedian incisions.
  • The skin is incised sharply; subcutaneous fat is minimal. Identify and preserve any perforating vessels.
  • Plan the incision through viable skin; in the presence of a Morel-Lavallée lesion, avoid previous degloving planes.
Step 3Exposure of the posterior ilium & sacrum
  • Elevate the gluteus maximus from the iliac crest and sacrum in a lateral-to-medial direction and reflect it laterally to expose the posterior ilium and the SI joint.
  • Elevate the erector spinae from the sacral spinous processes and laminae. Identify the posterior SI ligaments but do not divide them unless necessary for reduction.
  • Palpate the greater sciatic notch and place a malleable retractor to protect the superior gluteal bundle and sciatic nerve. Identify the L5 nerve root on the sacral ala if anterior exposure is needed.
Step 4Reduction of the posterior ring
  • Crescent fractures: control the posterior iliac fragment with a 5 mm Schanz pin in the PSIS as a joystick; apply pointed reduction clamps across the SI joint or fracture line; reduce the joint surface under direct vision.
  • Sacral fractures: Schanz pins in the iliac wing and sacrum allow derotation and compression.
  • Spinopelvic dissociation: realign the lumbar spine with the pelvis using Schanz pins in L5 or the iliac wings; apply distraction or compression under fluoroscopic guidance.
  • Confirm reduction with inlet, outlet and lateral fluoroscopy before any fixation.
Step 5Fixation constructs
  • Tension-band plating: a 3.5 mm or 4.5 mm reconstruction plate contoured from the posterior ilium across the sacrum to the contralateral ilium, posterior to the SI joint, with at least three screws each side — resists rotation.
  • Transiliac internal fixator (TIFI): two iliac screws (7.0 to 8.0 mm diameter, 60 to 80 mm length) in each ilium connected by a transverse rod lying subcutaneously or subfascially — useful when soft-tissue cover is poor.
  • Lumbopelvic fixation: pedicle screws in L5 (and L4 if more points are needed) connected to iliac screws (7.5 to 8.5 mm, 70 to 90 mm) or S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws; rods restore spine-to-pelvis continuity and cross-connectors add rotational stability.
  • Supplementary iliosacral screws: 7.3 mm cannulated screws placed percutaneously or open across the SI joint into the S1 body to augment a plate or lumbopelvic construct, only when a safe corridor exists on preoperative CT.
Step 6Closure & soft-tissue management
  • Meticulous haemostasis; place two deep drains (one along each SI joint).
  • Reattach the gluteus maximus to the iliac crest and sacral fascia with heavy absorbable sutures. Close the subcutaneous tissue in layers; skin with staples or nylon.
  • Apply a sterile negative-pressure dressing if soft-tissue swelling is significant.
  • Patients are log-rolled only for the first 48 to 72 hours; no direct pressure is placed on the posterior wound.
Dangers during exposure
  • L5 nerve root on the sacral ala — gentle retraction only; identify it before placing retractors medially.
  • Superior gluteal neurovascular bundle at the sciatic notch — protect with a malleable retractor; it exits 2 to 3 cm inferior to the PSIS.
  • Thin subcutaneous tissue over the sacrum — avoid aggressive retraction that devascularises the skin.
Dangers during fixation
  • Screw penetration of the sacral foramina — confirm trajectory on inlet and outlet views; directly visualise the posterior foramina.
  • Iliac screw breach into the sciatic notch or acetabulum — use obturator-oblique and iliac-oblique views.
  • Over-compression of comminuted sacral fractures — can narrow the foramina and injure nerve roots.
Incision & soft-tissue handling

Make the incision 2 cm lateral to the PSIS so the final scar does not lie directly over the hardware. Raise thick subcutaneous flaps and identify the gluteus maximus fascia early, then elevate the gluteus maximus from lateral to medial as a single flap, preserving its blood supply from the superior and inferior gluteal vessels.

Sciatic notch protection

Always identify the greater sciatic notch and place a malleable retractor before any deep dissection or reduction. The superior gluteal bundle exits 2 to 3 cm inferior to the PSIS — protect it throughout. Near the notch, use a headlight and loupes.

Crescent fracture reduction

For crescent fractures, reduce the SI joint surface under direct vision first. Use a pointed reduction clamp from the sacral ala to the iliac wing and confirm the articular surface is anatomic before placing any hardware. Only then apply the tension-band plate or transiliac fixator.

Aftercare & Complications


Immediate post-operative (day 0 to 7) - Mobilisation: log-roll only for the first 48 to 72 hours with no direct pressure on the posterior wound; begin bed-to-chair transfers with assistance once drains are removed.

  • DVT prophylaxis: low-molecular-weight heparin from 12 hours post-operatively, continued for 4 to 6 weeks or until fully mobile.
  • Drains: remove when output is less than 30 mL per 24 hours (typically day 2 to 4).
  • Wound care: daily inspection; a negative-pressure dressing, if used, stays for 5 to 7 days.
  • Neurologic monitoring: serial examination of L5 and S1 root function; any deterioration prompts urgent CT. Weight-bearing and rehabilitation - Non-weight-bearing or toe-touch weight-bearing on the affected side for 6 to 12 weeks depending on fracture pattern and construct rigidity.
  • Lumbopelvic constructs allow earlier mobilisation (within 1 to 2 weeks) because of superior stability.
  • Physical therapy begins with gentle hip and knee range-of-motion once the wound is stable; progressive strengthening from 6 weeks; core stabilisation and gait training from 8 to 12 weeks.
  • Return to work: sedentary duties at 3 to 4 months, manual labour at 6 to 9 months. Follow-up schedule - 2 weeks: wound check, radiographs (AP, inlet, outlet).
  • 6 weeks: radiographs, assess for loss of reduction.
  • 3 months: CT to confirm union if radiographs are equivocal.
  • 6 to 9 months: consider hardware removal if prominence is symptomatic. Complications
Wound breakdown and infection
Incidence
10 to 20 percent
Recognition
Erythema, dehiscence, drainage, exposed hardware; positive wound cultures; raised CRP and white cell count
Prevention & management
Prevention: staged management of Morel-Lavallée lesions, meticulous soft-tissue handling, drains, log-roll protocol, stop smoking. Management: serial debridement, negative-pressure therapy, culture-directed antibiotics, hardware removal once united
L5 or sacral nerve root injury
Incidence
3 to 8 percent
Recognition
New foot drop, weak hip abduction, perineal numbness, bowel or bladder dysfunction; EMG confirmation
Prevention & management
Prevention: identify the L5 root on the sacral ala, protect the notch contents, confirm screw trajectories on multiplanar imaging. Management: immediate exploration if recognised intraoperatively; late presentation may need nerve grafting or tendon transfer
Hardware prominence and pain
Incidence
15 to 25 percent
Recognition
Palpable or visible hardware under thin posterior skin; pain sitting or lying supine; skin breakdown over hardware
Prevention & management
Prevention: low-profile plates, subfascial rod placement, counsel patients preoperatively. Management: hardware removal after radiographic union (usually greater than 9 months); wound coverage if skin breaks down
Nonunion or malunion
Incidence
5 to 10 percent
Recognition
Persistent pain, inability to mobilise, visible deformity on radiographs, CT confirming lack of bridging callus
Prevention & management
Prevention: anatomic reduction, rigid multiplanar fixation, bone grafting in comminuted fractures. Management: revision ORIF with bone graft; consider lumbopelvic fusion for recalcitrant nonunion
Loss of reduction / implant failure
Incidence
4 to 8 percent
Recognition
Progressive displacement on serial radiographs, broken screws or rods, recurrent vertical instability
Prevention & management
Prevention: adequate points of fixation (at least four screws for lumbopelvic constructs), anterior ring stabilisation in vertically unstable patterns. Management: revision fixation with larger constructs or supplementary anterior fixation
Gluteal compartment syndrome
Incidence
rare (less than 1 percent)
Recognition
Severe buttock pain, tense swelling, sciatic nerve palsy, compartment pressures greater than 30 mmHg
Prevention & management
Prevention: avoid excessive gluteus maximus retraction, release fascia if pressure is raised intraoperatively. Management: emergent gluteal fasciotomy, delayed closure
Complications of posterior pelvic ring ORIF — recognition and management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention & management
Wound breakdown and infection10 to 20 percentErythema, dehiscence, drainage, exposed hardware; positive wound cultures; raised CRP and white cell countPrevention: staged management of Morel-Lavallée lesions, meticulous soft-tissue handling, drains, log-roll protocol, stop smoking. Management: serial debridement, negative-pressure therapy, culture-directed antibiotics, hardware removal once united
L5 or sacral nerve root injury3 to 8 percentNew foot drop, weak hip abduction, perineal numbness, bowel or bladder dysfunction; EMG confirmationPrevention: identify the L5 root on the sacral ala, protect the notch contents, confirm screw trajectories on multiplanar imaging. Management: immediate exploration if recognised intraoperatively; late presentation may need nerve grafting or tendon transfer
Hardware prominence and pain15 to 25 percentPalpable or visible hardware under thin posterior skin; pain sitting or lying supine; skin breakdown over hardwarePrevention: low-profile plates, subfascial rod placement, counsel patients preoperatively. Management: hardware removal after radiographic union (usually greater than 9 months); wound coverage if skin breaks down
Nonunion or malunion5 to 10 percentPersistent pain, inability to mobilise, visible deformity on radiographs, CT confirming lack of bridging callusPrevention: anatomic reduction, rigid multiplanar fixation, bone grafting in comminuted fractures. Management: revision ORIF with bone graft; consider lumbopelvic fusion for recalcitrant nonunion
Loss of reduction / implant failure4 to 8 percentProgressive displacement on serial radiographs, broken screws or rods, recurrent vertical instabilityPrevention: adequate points of fixation (at least four screws for lumbopelvic constructs), anterior ring stabilisation in vertically unstable patterns. Management: revision fixation with larger constructs or supplementary anterior fixation
Gluteal compartment syndromerare (less than 1 percent)Severe buttock pain, tense swelling, sciatic nerve palsy, compartment pressures greater than 30 mmHgPrevention: avoid excessive gluteus maximus retraction, release fascia if pressure is raised intraoperatively. Management: emergent gluteal fasciotomy, delayed closure

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

PELVISPosterior pelvic ring — danger structures

P
Piriformis & sciatic notch contents
Superior gluteal bundle exits superior to piriformis; identify and protect with a malleable retractor
E
Exit of the L5 nerve root
Crosses the sacral ala 2 cm medial to the SI joint; gentle retraction only, confirm with imaging
L
Lumbosacral trunk & sacral plexus
Vulnerable during anterior SI plating; limit medial retraction of the iliacus
V
Vertical shear instability
Posterior constructs must resist vertical displacement; use at least two points of fixation
I
Iliac or S2AI screw trajectories
Must avoid the sciatic notch and acetabulum; confirm on obturator-outlet and iliac-oblique views
S
Sacral foramina
S1 and S2 roots exit here; avoid screw or plate penetration; map on preoperative CT
Mnemonic

CRESCENTCrescent fracture — reduction sequence

C
Crescent fragment identification
The posterior iliac fragment stays attached to the sacrum via the posterior SI ligaments; reduce the joint surface first
R
Reduction under direct vision
Pointed reduction clamps or Schanz pins in the iliac wing and sacrum to derotate and compress
E
Extra-articular vs intra-articular
Confirm the fracture line exits the SI joint; debride any intra-articular debris before reduction
S
Schanz pin joystick
Place a 5 mm Schanz pin in the PSIS as a handle to control the hemipelvis
C
Compression across the SI joint
After reduction apply a pointed clamp across the joint and confirm with fluoroscopy
E
Extra points of fixation
Supplement SI joint compression with a tension-band plate or transiliac internal fixator
N
Neurologic monitoring
Document L5 and sacral root function before and after reduction; any change prompts imaging
T
Tension-band construct
A posterior tension-band plate from ilium to ilium or ilium to sacrum resists rotational forces

Critical danger structures and exam traps

L5 nerve root on the sacral ala

Location: Exits the L5-S1 foramen and courses laterally across the sacral ala about 2 cm medial to the SI joint before entering the greater sciatic notch. Risk: During posterior or anterior SI approaches the L5 root is vulnerable to retraction injury, drill penetration or screw placement; injury causes foot drop and weak hip abduction. Protection: Identify the root early, retract gently, and confirm screw trajectories with intraoperative imaging in multiple planes.

Superior gluteal neurovascular bundle

Location: Exits the greater sciatic notch superior to the piriformis, 2 to 3 cm inferior to the PSIS along the inner table of the ilium. Risk: During posterior dissection or iliac screw placement the bundle can be lacerated or compressed, causing gluteal compartment syndrome or abductor weakness. Protection: Limit medial retraction of the gluteus maximus, identify the notch, and protect its contents with a malleable retractor when working nearby.

Sacral nerve roots in the foramina

Location: S1 and S2 roots exit through the anterior and posterior sacral foramina; the S1 foramen lies 2 to 3 cm medial to the SI joint. Risk: Trans-sacral screws or sacral plating crossing a foramen can cause permanent bowel, bladder or sexual dysfunction. Protection: Preoperative CT to map the foramina, navigated or fluoroscopically confirmed trajectories, and direct visualisation of the posterior foramina during reduction.

Wound breakdown & Morel-Lavallée lesion

Why critical: The posterior sacral skin is thin, poorly vascularised and lies directly on bone; degloving creates large dead spaces that collect haematoma and become infected. Implication: Up to 20 percent of posterior pelvic approaches develop wound complications requiring reoperation; staged debridement of Morel-Lavallée lesions before definitive fixation is often required. Prevention: Incise through viable skin, use drains liberally, close without tension, and keep patients off the wound (log-roll only) for the first 48 to 72 hours.

Spinopelvic dissociation vs stable sacral fracture

Trap: Not every sacral fracture line that looks transverse on axial CT is a spinopelvic dissociation; true dissociation needs bilateral sacral fractures or a U/H/T pattern disconnecting the spine from both hemipelves. Fix: Obtain sagittal and coronal reformats; look for L5-S1 kyphosis, anterior sacral displacement and bilateral sacral involvement — these mandate lumbopelvic rather than iliosacral fixation alone.

Dysmorphic sacrum precluding iliosacral screws

Definition: The upper sacral segment is not recessed behind the iliac wing, the alar slope is steep, the safe corridor is less than 10 mm, or there is anterior cortical indentation at the S1 body. Consequence: Percutaneous iliosacral screws in a dysmorphic sacrum risk catastrophic nerve or vascular injury; open posterior ORIF with direct reduction and plating, or a transiliac fixator, is safer. Decision: Preoperative CT assessment of the corridor is mandatory; if it is inadequate, plan an open posterior or anterior approach from the outset.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 34-year-old male polytrauma patient sustains a U-type sacral fracture with 2 cm displacement and bilateral lower-limb weakness (L5 and S1 roots). CT shows sacral dysmorphism with a narrow S1 corridor. How do you plan definitive fixation?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 42-year-old woman sustains a displaced crescent fracture of the right ilium extending into the SI joint with 15 mm displacement. The posterior soft tissues are intact. Describe your reduction and fixation strategy.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 28-year-old male with a comminuted sacral fracture and vertical shear instability undergoes posterior ORIF with tension-band plating and supplementary iliosacral screws. On the first post-operative day he develops a foot drop. What is your immediate management?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Posterior pelvic ring ORIF — exam-day essentials

Indications

  • Irreducible displacement greater than 1 cm, comminuted sacral fractures with dysmorphism, crescent fractures with intra-articular extension, spinopelvic dissociation (U/H/T-type)
  • Failed percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation or loss of reduction
  • Open pelvic fractures requiring debridement and direct stabilisation
  • Associated neurologic deficit requiring decompression

Danger structures

  • L5 nerve root crosses the sacral ala 2 cm medial to the SI joint — foot drop if injured
  • Superior gluteal neurovascular bundle exits the greater sciatic notch 2 to 3 cm inferior to the PSIS
  • S1 and S2 nerve roots in the sacral foramina — bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction if injured
  • Sciatic nerve lies anterior to the piriformis in the notch
  • Thin posterior soft-tissue envelope — high wound breakdown risk (10 to 20 percent)

Surgical approaches

  • Posterior midline or paramedian: elevate the gluteus maximus flap laterally, protect the notch contents with a malleable retractor
  • Anterior SI joint approach (lateral window of the ilioinguinal): protect the L5 root on the sacral ala and the lumbosacral trunk
  • Choice of approach is driven by soft-tissue status and fracture pattern (crescent vs sacral vs spinopelvic dissociation)

Fixation constructs

  • Tension-band plating (ilium to ilium or ilium to sacrum): resists rotation, needs good soft-tissue cover
  • Transiliac internal fixator (TIFI): useful when posterior skin is compromised, good rotational control
  • Lumbopelvic fixation (L5/L4 pedicle screws to iliac or S2AI screws): gold standard for spinopelvic dissociation, at least four points of fixation
  • Supplementary iliosacral screws only when a safe corridor is confirmed on preoperative CT

Reduction principles

  • Crescent fractures: Schanz pin joystick in the PSIS, pointed reduction clamps, direct visualisation of the SI joint surface
  • Sacral fractures: Schanz pins in the iliac wing and sacrum, derotate and compress under fluoroscopy
  • Spinopelvic dissociation: realign the lumbar spine to the pelvis, restore continuity with a lumbopelvic construct
  • Always confirm reduction with inlet, outlet and lateral sacral views before fixation

Complications

  • Wound breakdown and infection: 10 to 20 percent; staged soft-tissue management, drains, log-roll protocol
  • Neurologic injury (L5 or sacral roots): 3 to 8 percent; identify roots, confirm screw trajectories on multiplanar imaging
  • Hardware prominence: 15 to 25 percent; counsel patients, plan removal after union if symptomatic
  • Nonunion or malunion: 5 to 10 percent; anatomic reduction, rigid fixation, bone grafting when needed
  • Loss of reduction: 4 to 8 percent; ensure adequate points of fixation and anterior ring stabilisation

Post-operative protocol

  • Log-roll only for the first 48 to 72 hours; no direct pressure on the posterior wound
  • Drains until output is less than 30 mL per 24 hours
  • Touch-down weight-bearing for 6 to 12 weeks; earlier mobilisation with rigid lumbopelvic constructs
  • CT at 3 months to confirm union; consider hardware removal at 9 to 12 months if prominent

Special situations

  • Spinopelvic dissociation: lumbopelvic fixation mandatory; sacral decompression if a neurologic deficit is present
  • Crescent fracture with intra-articular extension: direct joint visualisation, tension-band plating
  • Dysmorphic sacrum: precludes iliosacral screws; plan open posterior ORIF from the outset
  • Morel-Lavallée lesion: staged debridement before definitive posterior fixation

Background & Evidence


Osseous anatomy. The posterior pelvic ring comprises the sacrum (five fused vertebrae) and the posterior ilium. The SI joint is a true synovial joint anteriorly with a fibrous posterior component. Key landmarks: the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS, palpable and the starting point for many posterior approaches), the posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS, marks the superior border of the greater sciatic notch), the sacral foramina (S1 and S2 most relevant, lying 2 to 3 cm medial to the SI joint), and the sacral ala (the lateral mass whose anterior surface is crossed by the L5 nerve root). Ligamentous restraints. The posterior SI ligaments (interosseous, short posterior, long posterior) are the strongest stabilisers of the SI joint. In crescent fractures the posterior fragment remains attached to the sacrum via these ligaments, allowing indirect reduction through manipulation of the ilium. Neurovascular structures at risk. The L5 nerve root exits the L5-S1 foramen and courses laterally across the sacral ala about 2 cm medial to the SI joint before entering the greater sciatic notch — vulnerable during anterior retraction of the iliacus or screw placement across the ala. The sacral roots (S1 to S4) exit through the anterior and posterior foramina; the S1 root carries most of the sciatic nerve contribution, so its injury causes weak foot plantarflexion and perineal sensory loss. The superior gluteal neurovascular bundle exits the greater sciatic notch superior to the piriformis, 2 to 3 cm inferior to the PSIS, supplying gluteus medius and minimus — laceration causes abductor weakness and can produce a gluteal compartment syndrome. The sciatic nerve lies anterior to the piriformis in the notch; excessive medial retraction or posterior displacement of fragments can stretch or compress it. Soft-tissue envelope. The posterior sacral skin is thin (less than 1 cm in many patients) and lies directly on bone. The gluteus maximus originates from the posterior ilium and sacrum and is elevated as a flap during the approach. Morel-Lavallée lesions (closed degloving) are common in high-energy pelvic trauma and create large dead spaces prone to infection. Comparative outcomes of fixation constructs.

Tension-band plating (ilium to ilium or ilium to sacrum)
Stability
Moderate rotational control
Indications
Crescent fractures, SI joint disruptions without vertical shear
Complication rate
Wound breakdown 10 to 15 percent
Key limitation
Limited resistance to vertical shear
Transiliac internal fixator (TIFI)
Stability
Good rotational and some vertical control
Indications
Bilateral posterior ring injuries, poor soft-tissue cover
Complication rate
Wound breakdown 8 to 12 percent, hardware prominence
Key limitation
Requires intact posterior ilium
Lumbopelvic fixation (L5/L4 to iliac or S2AI screws)
Stability
Excellent multiplanar stability
Indications
Spinopelvic dissociation, highly unstable sacral fractures
Complication rate
Hardware prominence 15 to 20 percent, wound issues 12 to 18 percent
Key limitation
Longer surgery, more extensive exposure
Supplementary iliosacral screws
Stability
Augments any construct
Indications
When a safe corridor exists on CT
Complication rate
Neurologic injury 1 to 3 percent if dysmorphic
Key limitation
Contraindicated in narrow or dysmorphic corridors
Posterior pelvic ring fixation constructs — comparative outcomes
ConstructStabilityIndicationsComplication rateKey limitation
Tension-band plating (ilium to ilium or ilium to sacrum)Moderate rotational controlCrescent fractures, SI joint disruptions without vertical shearWound breakdown 10 to 15 percentLimited resistance to vertical shear
Transiliac internal fixator (TIFI)Good rotational and some vertical controlBilateral posterior ring injuries, poor soft-tissue coverWound breakdown 8 to 12 percent, hardware prominenceRequires intact posterior ilium
Lumbopelvic fixation (L5/L4 to iliac or S2AI screws)Excellent multiplanar stabilitySpinopelvic dissociation, highly unstable sacral fracturesHardware prominence 15 to 20 percent, wound issues 12 to 18 percentLonger surgery, more extensive exposure
Supplementary iliosacral screwsAugments any constructWhen a safe corridor exists on CTNeurologic injury 1 to 3 percent if dysmorphicContraindicated in narrow or dysmorphic corridors

Special case: spinopelvic dissociation. U-type, H-type and T-type sacral fractures disconnect the lumbar spine from the pelvis; sagittal CT reformats show L5-S1 kyphosis and anterior sacral displacement, and a neurologic deficit (bowel, bladder, sexual dysfunction, lower-limb weakness) is present in 60 to 80 percent of cases. Fixation is lumbopelvic — pedicle screws in L5 (and L4 if more points are needed) connected to iliac or S2AI screws, with at least four points of fixation (two lumbar, two iliac), supplemented by iliosacral screws where corridors are safe. Sacral decompression (laminectomy) is performed when a deficit is present and imaging shows root compression. Union rates exceed 90 percent with modern constructs, neurologic recovery occurs in about 60 percent of patients with preoperative deficits, and hardware prominence requiring removal occurs in 15 to 25 percent.

References


Evidence

Decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with spino-pelvic dissociation

Level IV
Schildhauer TA, Bellabarba C, Nork SE, et al • J Orthop Trauma (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Lumbopelvic fixation achieved solid union in spinopelvic dissociation injuries, with neurologic deficit present in most cases
Clinical implication: Rigid lumbopelvic constructs are indicated for U/H/T-type sacral fractures to restore spinopelvic continuity.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16891935)
Evidence

CT-based 3-D visualisation of secure bone corridors and optimal trajectories for sacroiliac screws

Level III
Mendel T, Radetzki F, Wohlrab D, et al • Injury (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Dysmorphic sacra demonstrate significantly narrower safe corridors for iliosacral screws in over 20 percent of cases
Clinical implication: Preoperative CT assessment of sacral morphology is mandatory; open posterior ORIF when corridors are unsafe.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23246561)
Evidence

Posterior iliac crescent fracture-dislocation: is it only rotationally unstable?

Level IV
Zong Z, Chen S, Jia M, et al • Orthopedics (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Crescent fracture-dislocations require specific reduction and fixation strategies addressing both rotational and vertical instability
Clinical implication: Direct visualisation and posterior tension-band constructs provide reliable outcomes for crescent fractures.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24810819)
Evidence

Comparison of modified transiliac internal fixators: mechanical testing on pelvic models

Level III
Salášek M, Lobovský L, Hluchá J, et al • Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech (2021)
Key Findings:
  • Mechanical testing confirms the transiliac internal fixator provides effective rotational stability for posterior pelvic ring injuries
Clinical implication: TIFI is a valuable option when the soft-tissue envelope precludes extensive plating or lumbopelvic constructs.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 34738891)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Posterior Approach to Sacroiliac JointAnterior Approach to Sacroiliac Joint
Browse all procedures