Posterolateral Corner (PLC) Reconstruction of the Knee

Sports MedicineAdvancedCore Procedure

Posterolateral Corner (PLC) Reconstruction of the Knee

Surgical technique guide for anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction — LaPrade fibular-and-tibial-based technique, common peroneal nerve protection, combined cruciate and osteotomy considerations, graft selection and fixation

High-yield overview

Anatomic reconstruction of LCL, popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Common Peroneal Nerve — Identification and Decompression

Location: The common peroneal nerve lies posterior to the biceps femoris tendon, approximately 2 cm distal to the fibular head, and courses around the fibular neck before entering the peroneal compartment.

Risk: Nerve injury or palsy occurs in 15-25 percent of acute PLC injuries and is the most common major complication of reconstruction. In chronic cases the nerve may be encased in scar and require neurolysis.

The fix: Always identify the nerve at the posterior border of the biceps femoris, decompress it from the fibular neck to the peroneal tunnel, and protect it with a vessel loop throughout the procedure. Intraoperative nerve stimulation confirms continuity.

Fibular Head Tunnel Placement — Fracture Risk

Location: The fibular head is small (average width 18-22 mm). A tunnel placed too anterior, too distal or too large risks fracture or blow-out of the anterior or posterior cortex.

Risk: Fibular head fracture during tunnel reaming or fixation compromises the reconstruction and may require conversion to tibial-based fixation or staged bone grafting.

The fix: Use a 6-7 mm tunnel centred in the fibular head, directed from anterolateral to posteromedial, exiting 1 cm distal to the tip of the fibular styloid. Confirm position with fluoroscopy in two planes before reaming.

Tunnel Convergence — Femoral ACL and PLC

Location: The femoral attachment of the LCL is 3-4 mm proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle; the popliteus tendon attaches 11 mm anterior and distal to the LCL origin. ACL femoral tunnel is typically 6-7 mm from the lateral condyle wall.

Risk: Divergent tunnel angles can cause the ACL and PLC tunnels to intersect within the lateral femoral condyle, weakening both reconstructions and risking graft failure.

The fix: Aim the PLC femoral tunnels 35-40 degrees anterior and proximal relative to the lateral epicondyle axis. Use fluoroscopy or navigation to confirm divergence before reaming. In combined cases, drill the ACL tunnel last.

Missed Chronic Varus Alignment

Location: Long-standing PLC insufficiency produces lateral joint opening and medial compartment overload, resulting in varus malalignment greater than 5 degrees on standing hip-knee-ankle radiograph.

Risk: Ligament reconstruction alone in the presence of uncorrected varus leads to rapid graft stretch-out and recurrent instability. Osteotomy is mandatory when mechanical axis falls medial to the medial tibial spine.

The fix: Obtain full-length standing radiographs in all chronic cases. Correct varus greater than 5 degrees with medial opening-wedge or lateral closing-wedge biplanar osteotomy before or concurrent with ligament reconstruction.

Popliteal Artery and Vein Proximity

Location: The popliteal vessels lie immediately medial to the popliteus tendon insertion on the posterior tibia. Aggressive tibial tunnel reaming or guide-pin advancement risks vascular injury.

Risk: Posterior tibial tunnel penetration can cause life-threatening haemorrhage or arteriovenous fistula. The safe zone is limited.

The fix: Use a posteromedial tibial tunnel starting 1 cm distal and medial to Gerdy's tubercle, aimed 60 degrees distal and 20 degrees medial. Confirm guide-pin position with lateral fluoroscopy before reaming. Have vascular instruments available.

Combined Cruciate Injury — Order of Reconstruction

Location: In combined ACL-PLC or PCL-PLC injuries the sequence of graft tensioning determines final stability. Tensioning the cruciate first in varus can overconstrain or underconstrain the knee.

Risk: Incorrect tensioning order produces residual varus or rotational laxity and accelerates graft failure.

The fix: Reduce the knee in neutral rotation and slight valgus before fixing the PLC. Tension and fix the cruciate grafts last, after PLC fixation. In combined PCL-PLC, fix the PCL at 90 degrees flexion first, then the PLC at 20-30 degrees.

Mnemonic

L.P.P.PLC — Three Static Stabilisers and Their Functions

Mnemonic

D.I.A.L.DIAL — Diagnostic Algorithm for PLC Injury

Mnemonic

S.A.F.E.SAFE — Tunnel Placement Principles

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Grade III PLC injury with symptomatic varus instability or thrust gait
  • Combined cruciate and PLC injury requiring multi-ligament reconstruction
  • Failed cruciate reconstruction secondary to untreated PLC insufficiency
  • Chronic PLC injury with greater than 10 degrees side-to-side external rotation difference on dial test

Relative Indications

  • Grade II PLC injury with persistent functional instability after 3-6 months of rehabilitation
  • Varus alignment greater than 5 degrees with medial compartment overload symptoms
  • Patient with high-demand pivoting or cutting sports and documented grade III laxity

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active knee infection or septic arthritis
  • Uncontrolled medical comorbidities precluding major surgery
  • Non-ambulatory patient with minimal functional demand

Relative:

  • Acute grade I-II PLC injury (trial of non-operative management first)
  • Isolated grade II injury without thrust or giving-way symptoms
  • Severe arthrofibrosis or limited range of motion less than 90 degrees flexion

Evidence for Anatomic Reconstruction

Why Anatomic Reconstruction Matters

  • Non-anatomic fibular-based techniques (Larson figure-of-8) restore only two of the three static stabilisers and do not address the popliteofibular ligament contribution to external rotation control at 60-90 degrees.
  • LaPrade anatomic technique with separate femoral tunnels for LCL and popliteus plus fibular and tibial tunnels restores near-native varus and rotational stability in biomechanical studies.
  • In combined ACL-PLC injuries, anatomic PLC reconstruction reduces ACL graft forces by 30-40 percent compared with non-anatomic techniques.

Combined Osteotomy Evidence

  • Chronic varus greater than 5 degrees produces medial compartment overload and accelerates graft failure. Opening-wedge or closing-wedge biplanar osteotomy normalises the mechanical axis and improves ligament reconstruction survival.
  • In series of combined osteotomy plus ligament reconstruction, 85-90 percent of patients achieve good or excellent outcomes at 5 years with low revision rates.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 28-year-old rugby player sustains a combined ACL and grade III PLC injury during a tackle. Standing radiographs show 6 degrees of varus alignment. Describe your surgical plan, including the sequence of procedures and the rationale for any osteotomy.

Practical approach
I would perform anatomic ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft combined with LaPrade anatomic PLC reconstruction using Achilles allograft. Because of the 6-degree varus alignment, I would first perform a biplanar medial opening-wedge osteotomy to neutralise the mechanical axis before ligament reconstruction. The sequence is: (1) diagnostic arthroscopy and meniscal work, (2) posterolateral exposure with common peroneal nerve identification and decompression, (3) fibular and tibial tunnel creation, (4) femoral tunnel creation with fluoroscopic confirmation of divergence from the ACL tunnel, (5) graft passage and PLC fixation at 20 degrees (LCL) and 60 degrees (popliteus/PFL), and (6) ACL fixation last under valgus load. The osteotomy addresses the chronic varus that would otherwise cause rapid graft stretch-out.
Further questions
How would your plan change if the patient had a chronic isolated PLC injury with a previous failed ACL reconstruction and now presents with a varus thrust gait?
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

During a LaPrade PLC reconstruction, after drilling the fibular tunnel you notice loss of pin purchase and a small cortical breach on the anterior fibular head. What is your intraoperative decision-making process and how do you salvage the reconstruction?

Practical approach
I would immediately stop and assess the extent of the fracture with fluoroscopy. If the breach is small and the fibular head remains structurally intact, I would downsize the tunnel to 5 mm and use a smaller graft limb or convert the fibular-based limb to a tibial-based fixation using the existing tibial tunnel. If the fibular head is fractured and unstable, I would abandon the fibular tunnel, use a purely tibial-based reconstruction with two tibial tunnels (one for LCL and one for PFL), and consider staged bone grafting if bone stock is insufficient. I would document the complication, discuss with the patient postoperatively, and plan for protected weight bearing and delayed return to sport.
Further questions
What is the long-term functional consequence if you had proceeded with a non-anatomic fibular-based reconstruction instead of salvaging the anatomic technique?
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 35-year-old patient with a chronic combined PCL and PLC injury undergoes reconstruction. At 6 months postoperatively the dial test shows persistent 12-degree side-to-side difference at 30 degrees. What are the possible causes and your diagnostic work-up?

Practical approach
Possible causes include technical error (non-anatomic tunnel placement, inadequate tensioning, missed varus alignment), graft failure or stretch-out, tunnel convergence, or inadequate postoperative protection. My work-up would include: (1) full-length standing hip-knee-ankle radiograph to assess alignment, (2) varus and posterior stress radiographs to quantify laxity, (3) MRI to assess graft continuity and tunnel position, and (4) CT to evaluate tunnel convergence or malposition. If alignment is neutral and tunnels are anatomic but grafts are attenuated, I would plan revision reconstruction with fresh allograft and consider a more robust rehabilitation protocol. If varus is present, I would perform corrective osteotomy first.
Further questions
If imaging confirms neutral alignment, anatomic tunnels and intact grafts, what rehabilitation or bracing strategy would you employ before considering revision?
Exam day cheat sheet
Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction — Exam Quick Reference

References

Evidence

The posterolateral attachments of the knee: a qualitative and quantitative morphologic analysis of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, and lateral gastrocnemius tendon

Level IV
LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen LAm J Sports Med
Source: Am J Sports Med 2003;31(6):854-60
Evidence

An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique

Level III
LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen LAm J Sports Med
Source: Am J Sports Med 2004;32(6):1405-14
Evidence

Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy as the initial treatment for chronic posterolateral corner deficiency in the varus knee: a prospective clinical study

Level IV
Arthur A, LaPrade RF, Agel JAm J Sports Med
Source: Am J Sports Med 2007;35(11):1844-50
Evidence

Posterolateral corner injuries of the knee: anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment

Level IV
Cooper JM, McAndrews PT, LaPrade RFSports Med Arthrosc Rev
Source: Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2006;14(4):213-20
Evidence

Current concepts in the recognition and treatment of posterolateral corner injuries of the knee

Level IV
Lunden JB, Bzdusek PJ, Monson JK, Malcomson KW, LaPrade RFJ Orthop Sports Phys Ther
Source: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(8):502-16

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.