Antegrade intramedullary nailing via anterosuperior deltoid-split approach for surgical neck and proximal humeral fractures | advanced
Surgical Imaging
The trap: Using an older bent-nail entry point through the greater tuberosity and supraspinatus tendon footprint causes iatrogenic rotator cuff injury and persistent shoulder pain.
The fix: Modern straight nails permit a medial entry at the apex of the humeral head articular cartilage, completely sparing the rotator cuff insertion. Confirm the entry point on the AP and axillary views before reaming.
Location: The axillary nerve exits the quadrilateral space and courses transversely 5-7 cm distal to the acromion on the deep surface of the deltoid.
Risk: Extending the deltoid split beyond 5 cm without identifying the nerve risks transection or stretch injury. Always identify the nerve with a vessel loop before distal extension.
The trap: Accepting a varus reduction (head-shaft angle less than 120 degrees) leads to poor functional outcome, screw cut-out, and nonunion.
The fix: Achieve anatomic reduction before guide-wire placement. The medial entry point plus provisional K-wire stabilisation in valgus prevents varus collapse. Confirm 130-140 degrees on the true AP view before locking.
Location: The radial nerve lies in the spiral groove on the posterior humerus, approximately 10-12 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle.
Risk: A laterally directed distal interlocking screw or drill bit can injure the nerve when the arm is in neutral rotation. Place the arm in slight abduction and external rotation; use the image intensifier to confirm drill trajectory.
The trap: Treating a 2-part surgical neck fracture as isolated when the greater tuberosity is displaced greater than 5 mm leads to rotator cuff dysfunction and impingement.
The fix: Always assess tuberosity position on the AP, scapular-Y and axillary views. Displaced tuberosities require separate fixation (suture or screw) through the proximal nail locking options or additional mini-open approach.
Why different: Severe osteoporosis reduces proximal screw purchase and increases risk of screw back-out and secondary varus collapse.
Implications: Consider PMMA augmentation of the proximal locking screws or use of a nail with larger diameter proximal screws. Post-operative protected weight-bearing and delayed active abduction reduce early failure.
E.N.T.R.YENTRY — Straight Nail Entry Biomechanics
N.A.I.LNAIL — Proximal Humerus Nailing Checklist
A.V.O.I.DAVOID — Common Technical Errors
Surgical Indications
Absolute Indications
- Displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture with greater than 50% translation or greater than 30 degrees angulation in a physiologically young or active patient
- Segmental proximal humerus fractures extending into the diaphysis where a load-sharing implant is biomechanically advantageous
- Pathological fractures through metastatic lesions in the proximal humerus where immediate stability is required for palliation
- Failed non-operative treatment of a surgical neck fracture with ongoing pain and loss of function at 6-8 weeks
Relative Indications
- Osteoporotic 2-part or 3-part fractures in elderly patients where locking-plate fixation carries high risk of screw cut-out
- Bilateral proximal humerus fractures where a single implant allows earlier mobilisation
- Patients with poor soft-tissue envelope or comorbidities precluding extensive open reduction and plate fixation
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Active infection at the surgical site or systemic sepsis
- Severe pre-existing rotator cuff arthropathy or irreparable cuff tear that would render nailing ineffective
- Open proximal humerus fracture with extensive soft-tissue loss requiring flap coverage
Relative:
- Greater tuberosity displacement greater than 1 cm that cannot be adequately reduced and fixed through the nail (consider plate or combined approach)
- Severe varus deformity with medial comminution where anatomic reduction cannot be achieved closed (consider open reduction or plate)
- Patient non-compliance with protected weight-bearing in the early post-operative period
Evidence for Intramedullary Nailing versus Locking Plate
Biomechanical and Clinical Rationale
- Modern straight intramedullary nails provide a load-sharing construct that is particularly advantageous in osteoporotic bone and segmental fracture patterns
- The medial entry point completely spares the rotator cuff footprint, eliminating the iatrogenic cuff injury inherent in older bent-nail designs
- A systematic review of randomised trials comparing nailing versus locking-plate fixation found no significant difference in functional scores or complication rates at 1 year, but nailing was associated with shorter operative time and lower blood loss
- Nonunion rates are low (less than 5%) with both techniques when reduction is anatomic; varus malunion remains the most common technical error with nailing and strongly predicts poorer outcome
Comparison of Outcomes
Intramedullary Nail versus Locking Plate — Evidence Summary
Key Evidence
Effect of intramedullary nail and locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update systematic review and meta-analysis
The female geriatric proximal humeral fracture: protagonist for straight antegrade nailing?
Biomechanical evaluation of straight antegrade nailing in proximal humeral fractures: the rationale of the proximal anchoring point
Different treatments for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 68-year-old woman with osteoporosis (T-score -3.2) sustains a displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture of the proximal humerus after a fall from standing height. The head-shaft angle measures 95 degrees on the AP radiograph. Discuss your operative plan and the specific technical modifications required for osteoporotic bone.”
“You are planning antegrade nailing for a 45-year-old man with a segmental proximal humerus fracture extending into the diaphysis. The greater tuberosity is displaced 8 mm laterally. Walk me through the critical technical steps to address the tuberosity and ensure stable fixation.”
“A 72-year-old woman underwent antegrade nailing of a 2-part surgical neck fracture 8 weeks ago. She presents with increasing shoulder pain and radiographs show 15 degrees of varus collapse with one proximal screw backing out. Discuss your assessment and management options.”