Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Proximal Humerus ORIF with Locking Plate

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Proximal Humerus ORIF with Locking Plate

Surgical technique guide for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures using precontoured locking plates — deltopectoral approach, tuberosity reduction, calcar support, axillary nerve protection, and post-operative rehabilitation

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures using precontoured locking plates | advanced

traumaSubspecialty
8Operative steps
6Danger zones
90-120 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Indications centre on displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures in physiologically young patients with reconstructable bone stock — the Neer criteria of greater than 1 cm displacement or greater than 45 degrees angulation remain the practical thresholds that shift management from non-operative care to surgery.
  • The deltopectoral approach protects the axillary nerve by staying lateral to the coracoid and identifying the nerve at the inferior border of subscapularis or on the deep surface of deltoid; the cephalic vein is preserved medially or laterally depending on surgeon preference but must be protected throughout.
  • Medial calcar support and inferomedial screw placement are critical to prevent varus collapse — a single well-placed calcar or inferomedial support screw reduces failure rates dramatically in biomechanical studies.
  • Greater and lesser tuberosity reduction must be anatomic before plate application; non-absorbable suture augmentation through the rotator cuff insertions provides additional stability and allows early motion even when bone quality is poor.
Clinical Pearls
  • “
    The Neer classification remains the language of communication: 2-part, 3-part, 4-part, valgus-impacted — the number of parts equals the number of displaced segments that require independent reduction.
  • “
    The axillary nerve lies 5-7 cm distal to the acromion on the deep surface of deltoid; it is at risk during distal plate placement and during aggressive retraction of the deltoid.
  • “
    Valgus-impacted 4-part fractures have a better prognosis for head vascularity than classic 4-part fractures because the medial periosteal sleeve remains intact — this pattern is often amenable to percutaneous or limited open techniques.
  • “
    Locking plates allow fixed-angle constructs that tolerate early motion even in osteoporotic bone, but they do not replace the need for anatomic reduction and calcar support.

When & Why


The decision. Most proximal humerus fractures are minimally displaced and do well without surgery. ORIF with a locking plate is reserved for displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures in physiologically young patients with reconstructable bone stock, where preserving the native head gives the best long-term function. The Neer criteria — a segment displaced greater than 1 cm or angulated greater than 45 degrees — are the practical thresholds that move a fracture from non-operative care to surgery.

Non-operative

Minimally displaced fractures (less than 1 cm, less than 45 degrees) achieve good to excellent outcomes with early mobilisation in 80-90% of patients. A valgus-impacted 4-part fracture with an intact medial hinge does surprisingly well non-operatively — roughly 70% achieve satisfactory function without surgery. Requires disciplined physiotherapy and radiographic surveillance; loss of reduction occurs in up to 30% of displaced fractures treated non-operatively.

ORIF with locking plate

The reconstructive option for displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures in younger patients with good bone. Locking plates give fixed-angle stability that tolerates early motion even in osteoporotic bone; with anatomic reduction and calcar support, union rates of 85-95% are reported. Complications remain significant: screw cut-out 5-15%, avascular necrosis 5-20%, reoperation 10-25%.

Arthroplasty

Reserved for head-split fractures with greater than 40% articular involvement, severe osteoporosis with comminution that precludes stable fixation, or low-demand elderly patients with 4-part fractures. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasingly favoured over hemiarthroplasty in the elderly because it bypasses tuberosity healing and gives more predictable function.

Indications — absolute

  • Displaced 3-part proximal humerus fracture in a physiologically young patient with reconstructible bone stock.
  • Displaced 4-part fracture with an intact medial periosteal sleeve (valgus-impacted pattern) in a patient under 60-65 years.
  • 2-part surgical neck fracture with greater than 50% displacement or angulation greater than 45 degrees that fails closed reduction.
  • Associated greater tuberosity displacement greater than 5 mm in a young active patient (risk of rotator cuff dysfunction and impingement). Indications — relative
  • Valgus-impacted 4-part fracture in a patient over 65 with good bone quality and no head-split component.
  • 3-part fracture with significant medial comminution where a locking plate can restore calcar support.
  • Patient preference for anatomic reconstruction over non-operative care or arthroplasty after informed discussion. Contraindications — absolute
  • Head-split fracture with greater than 40% articular surface involvement (consider hemiarthroplasty or reverse).
  • Severe osteoporosis with comminution that precludes stable fixation (consider reverse shoulder arthroplasty).
  • Active infection or open fracture with gross contamination. Contraindications — relative
  • Age greater than 75 with low functional demand and acceptable alignment after closed reduction.
  • Significant medical comorbidities that increase perioperative risk.
  • Pre-existing rotator cuff tear arthropathy or glenohumeral arthritis favouring arthroplasty. What the evidence says. The PROFHER randomised trial is the key tempering study: in patients over 65 with displaced 2- and 3-part fractures, locking-plate fixation was no better than non-operative care in Oxford Shoulder Score at two years and carried more complications. This makes ORIF selective — strong for displaced 3- and 4-part fractures in physiologically young, reconstructible bone; non-operative care or arthroplasty for the low-demand elderly.

The Operation


The goal is to anatomically reduce the tuberosities and humeral head, restore the medial calcar, and stabilise the construct with a precontoured locking plate augmented by rotator-cuff sutures — all while protecting the axillary nerve and the blood supply to the head. The exposure is the deltopectoral approach, laid out step by step below.

Proximal humerus fracture fixed with a locking plate
Proximal humerus fracture fixed with a locking plate (PHILOS-type) and divergent locking screws supporting the humeral head.Credit: Thomas Zimmermann (THWZ) via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0 de)

Operative sequence — deltopectoral approach

Step 1Position, preparation & imaging
  • Beach-chair position, head secured, arm free or on a radiolucent arm board; support the scapula so the glenoid is perpendicular to the floor, with a bump under the ipsilateral scapula to improve access.
  • Bring the C-arm in from the contralateral side so true AP, axillary and scapular-Y views can be obtained without moving the arm excessively; confirm the entire proximal humerus including the shaft is visible before draping.
  • General anaesthesia with an interscalene block for postoperative analgesia. Hypotensive anaesthesia reduces bleeding but must be balanced against cerebral hypoperfusion risk in the beach-chair position.
  • Prep the entire arm including the hand so the elbow can be flexed and extended to assess reduction and nerve function; drape so the coracoid, acromion and lateral humerus are accessible.
Step 2Deltopectoral incision & superficial dissection
  • Make a 12-15 cm incision from the coracoid process distally along the deltopectoral groove, curving slightly laterally toward the deltoid insertion if more exposure is needed.
  • Identify the cephalic vein in the groove and develop the interval on either side; retract the vein laterally with the deltoid (most surgeons' preference) or medially with pectoralis.
  • Divide the clavipectoral fascia lateral to the coracoid; identify the coracoid and the conjoined tendon, and place a self-retaining or Hohmann retractor under the deltoid laterally.
  • The deltoid insertion on the humerus is released only 1-2 cm if additional exposure is required; the majority of the insertion is preserved.
Step 3Identify & protect the axillary nerve
  • With the arm abducted 30-40 degrees, palpate the inferior border of subscapularis — the axillary nerve can be felt or seen crossing from medial to lateral at this level.
  • Alternatively, palpate the deep surface of the deltoid 5-7 cm distal to the acromion.
  • Place a vessel loop around the nerve or mark its position mentally; all subsequent distal dissection and plate placement must remain proximal to this landmark.
Step 4Expose the fracture & rotator cuff
  • Incise the rotator interval between supraspinatus and subscapularis.
  • Tag the long head of biceps tendon with a stay suture — it is the landmark for the bicipital groove and the junction between the greater and lesser tuberosities.
  • Identify the fracture lines: the greater tuberosity is usually displaced posterolaterally by supraspinatus and infraspinatus; the lesser tuberosity is displaced medially by subscapularis; the head fragment sits in varus or valgus depending on the pattern.
  • Place heavy non-absorbable sutures through the supraspinatus/infraspinatus insertions on the greater tuberosity and through the subscapularis insertion on the lesser tuberosity — these are the reduction handles.
Step 5Reduce the tuberosities & humeral head
  • Reduce the greater tuberosity first to the head fragment using the tagged sutures — the reduction must be anatomic, as even 5 mm of displacement blocks rotation. Hold it temporarily with a pointed reduction clamp or K-wires.
  • Reduce the lesser tuberosity to the anterior aspect of the head.
  • In 4-part fractures, reduce the head to the shaft while preserving the medial periosteal hinge. For valgus-impacted fractures the head is often already in acceptable valgus and the tuberosities are rotated around it and must be brought down to the shaft.
  • The head should sit in slight valgus relative to the shaft — never over-reduce into varus to achieve calcar contact.
Step 6Apply the locking plate
  • Select a precontoured proximal humerus locking plate of appropriate length; it should sit 5-8 mm distal to the summit of the greater tuberosity and slightly posterior to the bicipital groove to avoid impingement.
  • Secure the plate provisionally with K-wires through the proximal holes and confirm position on AP and axillary fluoroscopy.
  • Place the inferomedial calcar screw first — this is the critical screw that supports the head and resists varus collapse; it is a locking screw directed inferomedially into the calcar region.
  • Place the remaining proximal locking screws, ensuring none penetrate the articular surface — image in multiple planes after each screw.
  • Place the distal shaft screws (usually 3-4 bicortical non-locking or locking screws) to secure the plate to the shaft.
Step 7Augment with rotator cuff sutures
  • Pass the previously placed rotator cuff sutures through the suture holes (eyelets) in the plate or around the plate and tie them securely.
  • This augments fixation and converts the deforming pull of the cuff into compressive forces across the fracture — especially important in osteoporotic bone where screw purchase in the head may be marginal.
Step 8Verify reduction & close
  • Obtain final fluoroscopy in true AP (Grashey), axillary and scapular-Y views; confirm anatomic reduction of both tuberosities, no intra-articular screw penetration (look for the 'light-bulb' sign on the axillary view), restoration of the medial calcar, and a head-shaft angle of approximately 130-140 degrees.
  • Test stability by gently ranging the shoulder — the construct should allow at least 30-40 degrees of passive external rotation and 90 degrees of abduction without displacement.
  • Close in layers; a drain is optional. Apply a sling with an abduction pillow.
Dangers — superficial dissection

Injury to the cephalic vein causes troublesome bleeding and postoperative swelling. Inadvertent division of the deltoid insertion too far distally weakens abduction, and dissecting through deltoid or pectoralis muscle means the interval has been missed. Identify the cephalic vein early and develop the deltopectoral interval cleanly before any deep work.

Dangers — reduction & the calcar

Accepting malreduction of the greater tuberosity because the plate appears to hold the head is a serious error — the tuberosity must be anatomic. Disrupting the medial periosteal sleeve during aggressive reduction manoeuvres increases the risk of avascular necrosis. Over-reducing into varus to achieve calcar contact is wrong; the head must sit in slight valgus relative to the shaft.

Cephalic vein — identify it first

Identify the cephalic vein first and protect it with a vessel loop. Develop the interval bluntly with scissors and finger dissection. If the vein is adherent to deltoid take it laterally; if it mobilises more easily medially, take it medially. Avoid tearing it — bleeding from a torn cephalic vein is difficult to control and obscures the field.

Find the axillary nerve before any distal work

Before placing any retractor or beginning distal exposure, find the axillary nerve. Pass a finger along the inferior border of subscapularis and feel the cord-like structure. Once its position is known, extending the exposure is safe. Never place a plate that extends more than 1 cm distal to the nerve without visualising and protecting it.

Reduce the greater tuberosity first

Reduce the greater tuberosity first using the cuff sutures as traction, aiming for it to sit exactly on the lateral aspect of the head with no gap and no step. Then reduce the lesser tuberosity to the anterior aspect. Only when both tuberosities are reduced should the head-to-shaft relationship be addressed. If the calcar is comminuted, use a small bone graft or the tip of the greater tuberosity as structural support.

Always augment with cuff sutures

After the plate is fixed, always augment with the rotator cuff sutures. Pass the supraspinatus and infraspinatus sutures through the plate eyelets or around the plate and tie them under tension. This converts the deforming forces of the cuff into compressive forces across the fracture, allows earlier motion and protects screw fixation in poor bone.

The axillary view catches the screw in the joint

Relying on the AP view alone misses central screw penetration. Obtain a true axillary view after each proximal screw and look for the 'light-bulb' sign — the spherical head outline with no screw protruding. In osteoporotic bone tactile feedback is unreliable; if there is any doubt, shorten the screw rather than risk chondrolysis.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation

Phase 1 — Protection
Timing
Week 0-4
Focus & therapy
Sling with abduction pillow; pendulum exercises and passive forward flexion to 90 degrees from day 3-5; active-assisted external rotation to 30 degrees (protected by suture augmentation); no active elevation against gravity; wound review at 10-14 days; radiographs at 2 and 4 weeks
Phase 2 — Active motion
Timing
Week 4-8
Focus & therapy
Discontinue sling if radiographs satisfactory; active-assisted to active range of motion in all planes; begin rotator cuff and deltoid isometrics; progressive resistance with theraband from week 6; radiographs at 6 and 8 weeks
Phase 3 — Strengthening
Timing
Week 8-16
Focus & therapy
Full active range of motion expected by 8-10 weeks; progressive resistance of rotator cuff, deltoid and scapular stabilisers; functional and proprioceptive training; return to light work at 8-12 weeks, heavy manual work or sport at 4-6 months
Post-operative rehabilitation protocol
PhaseTimingFocus & therapy
Phase 1 — ProtectionWeek 0-4Sling with abduction pillow; pendulum exercises and passive forward flexion to 90 degrees from day 3-5; active-assisted external rotation to 30 degrees (protected by suture augmentation); no active elevation against gravity; wound review at 10-14 days; radiographs at 2 and 4 weeks
Phase 2 — Active motionWeek 4-8Discontinue sling if radiographs satisfactory; active-assisted to active range of motion in all planes; begin rotator cuff and deltoid isometrics; progressive resistance with theraband from week 6; radiographs at 6 and 8 weeks
Phase 3 — StrengtheningWeek 8-16Full active range of motion expected by 8-10 weeks; progressive resistance of rotator cuff, deltoid and scapular stabilisers; functional and proprioceptive training; return to light work at 8-12 weeks, heavy manual work or sport at 4-6 months

Expected outcomes. With anatomic reduction and calcar support the union rate is 85-95%. Typical motion at one year is forward flexion 120-150 degrees and external rotation 30-50 degrees, with a Constant score of 60-80 points — better for 2- and 3-part fractures than for 4-part. Special situations

  • Osteoporotic bone: use longer plates with more distal screw options, consider cement augmentation of screw holes, be more aggressive with rotator cuff suture augmentation, and keep a lower threshold for conversion to reverse arthroplasty if fixation is tenuous.
  • Valgus-impacted 4-part fractures: the medial periosteal hinge is often intact — preserve it; percutaneous or limited open reduction may suffice, and the locking plate still allows early motion.
  • Associated greater tuberosity fracture: anatomic reduction is mandatory — even 5 mm of displacement causes impingement and weakness — and suture augmentation is especially valuable. Complications
Screw cut-out / intra-articular penetration
Incidence
5-15%
Recognition
Progressive pain, loss of motion, crepitus; screw tip visible within the joint on axillary or AP radiograph
Prevention & management
Confirm screw position on true AP, axillary and scapular-Y views after each screw; use shorter central screws. Intraoperative — exchange for a shorter screw; postoperative — revision screw exchange or conversion to arthroplasty if chondrolysis has begun
Varus collapse
Incidence
5-20%
Recognition
Progressive loss of reduction on serial radiographs; head falls into varus; screws back out or cut superiorly
Prevention & management
Restore medial calcar continuity; place at least one inferomedial calcar support screw; augment with cuff sutures; consider graft or cement in severe osteoporosis. Early — revision ORIF; established collapse with arthritis — reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Avascular necrosis of the humeral head
Incidence
5-20% (higher in 4-part)
Recognition
Gradual collapse of the head with sclerosis and fragmentation; pain and stiffness out of proportion to early radiographs
Prevention & management
Preserve all medial soft-tissue attachments; avoid excessive stripping of the head; accept stable valgus-impacted patterns. Symptomatic treatment initially; collapse with arthritis — hemiarthroplasty or reverse depending on cuff integrity and age
Axillary nerve injury
Incidence
2-5%
Recognition
Deltoid weakness or atrophy; sensory loss over the lateral shoulder; positive deltoid extension lag sign
Prevention & management
Identify the nerve before distal dissection; protect during retraction; do not extend the plate more than 1 cm distal to the nerve without visualisation. Most neuropraxias recover over 3-6 months; persistent deficit — exploration, neurolysis or grafting
Nonunion or malunion
Incidence
3-8%
Recognition
Persistent pain and motion at the fracture site beyond 3 months; no bridging callus; varus or valgus malalignment
Prevention & management
Achieve stable anatomic reduction with calcar support; avoid excessive periosteal stripping; consider bone graft in comminuted fractures. Symptomatic nonunion — revision ORIF with graft; symptomatic malunion — corrective osteotomy or arthroplasty
Stiffness and adhesive capsulitis
Incidence
10-30%
Recognition
Progressive loss of active and passive range, particularly external rotation and abduction; pain at end range
Prevention & management
Begin passive and active-assisted motion within the first week; protect tuberosity fixation with suture augmentation; use regional anaesthesia for early physiotherapy. Formal physiotherapy; manipulation under anaesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release if no improvement by 3-4 months
Infection (deep or superficial)
Incidence
1-3%
Recognition
Erythema, warmth, drainage, elevated CRP and ESR; wound breakdown; sinus tract in chronic cases
Prevention & management
Meticulous soft-tissue handling; perioperative antibiotics; layered closure without tension. Superficial — oral antibiotics and wound care; deep — debridement with implant retention if stable and IV antibiotics; chronic — staged revision with antibiotic spacer
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention & management
Screw cut-out / intra-articular penetration5-15%Progressive pain, loss of motion, crepitus; screw tip visible within the joint on axillary or AP radiographConfirm screw position on true AP, axillary and scapular-Y views after each screw; use shorter central screws. Intraoperative — exchange for a shorter screw; postoperative — revision screw exchange or conversion to arthroplasty if chondrolysis has begun
Varus collapse5-20%Progressive loss of reduction on serial radiographs; head falls into varus; screws back out or cut superiorlyRestore medial calcar continuity; place at least one inferomedial calcar support screw; augment with cuff sutures; consider graft or cement in severe osteoporosis. Early — revision ORIF; established collapse with arthritis — reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Avascular necrosis of the humeral head5-20% (higher in 4-part)Gradual collapse of the head with sclerosis and fragmentation; pain and stiffness out of proportion to early radiographsPreserve all medial soft-tissue attachments; avoid excessive stripping of the head; accept stable valgus-impacted patterns. Symptomatic treatment initially; collapse with arthritis — hemiarthroplasty or reverse depending on cuff integrity and age
Axillary nerve injury2-5%Deltoid weakness or atrophy; sensory loss over the lateral shoulder; positive deltoid extension lag signIdentify the nerve before distal dissection; protect during retraction; do not extend the plate more than 1 cm distal to the nerve without visualisation. Most neuropraxias recover over 3-6 months; persistent deficit — exploration, neurolysis or grafting
Nonunion or malunion3-8%Persistent pain and motion at the fracture site beyond 3 months; no bridging callus; varus or valgus malalignmentAchieve stable anatomic reduction with calcar support; avoid excessive periosteal stripping; consider bone graft in comminuted fractures. Symptomatic nonunion — revision ORIF with graft; symptomatic malunion — corrective osteotomy or arthroplasty
Stiffness and adhesive capsulitis10-30%Progressive loss of active and passive range, particularly external rotation and abduction; pain at end rangeBegin passive and active-assisted motion within the first week; protect tuberosity fixation with suture augmentation; use regional anaesthesia for early physiotherapy. Formal physiotherapy; manipulation under anaesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release if no improvement by 3-4 months
Infection (deep or superficial)1-3%Erythema, warmth, drainage, elevated CRP and ESR; wound breakdown; sinus tract in chronic casesMeticulous soft-tissue handling; perioperative antibiotics; layered closure without tension. Superficial — oral antibiotics and wound care; deep — debridement with implant retention if stable and IV antibiotics; chronic — staged revision with antibiotic spacer

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

CALCARCALCAR — medial support and reduction priorities

C
Calcar continuity
The inferomedial cortical hinge is the key to head vascularity and mechanical stability
A
Axillary nerve
Identified and protected before any distal plate placement — 5-7 cm distal to the acromion on the deep deltoid surface
L
Locking screws after reduction
Never use the plate to reduce the fracture — anatomic reduction first
C
Cephalic vein preserved
Develop the deltopectoral interval on either side and retract gently
A
Augmentation
Rotator cuff sutures through the tuberosity insertions add stability when bone is poor
R
Reduction of tuberosities
Greater and lesser tuberosities must be anatomic before plate application — confirm with the image intensifier
Mnemonic

NEERNEER — classification and surgical thresholds

N
Number of parts
2-part (surgical neck or tuberosity), 3-part (head plus one tuberosity), 4-part (head plus both tuberosities)
E
Each part displaced
Greater than 1 cm displacement or greater than 45 degrees angulation counts as a separate part
E
Evidence for surgery
Strongest in displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures in younger patients with good bone stock
R
Reconstructible head
An intact medial periosteal sleeve favours ORIF; head-split or impression fractures may favour arthroplasty
Axillary nerve — the deltoid danger

Location: the axillary nerve exits the quadrilateral space and courses transversely on the deep surface of the deltoid approximately 5-7 cm distal to the acromion. Risk: during the deltopectoral approach it is protected if dissection stays anterior, but extending the approach or placing a plate distally puts it at direct risk, as does aggressive deltoid retraction. The fix: identify it at the inferior border of subscapularis or by palpation on the deep deltoid surface before any distal dissection, mark its position, and keep all retractors and the distal plate proximal to it.

Cephalic vein — deltopectoral interval

Location: the cephalic vein lies in the deltopectoral groove, separating the deltoid (lateral) from pectoralis major (medial). Risk: easily injured during incision or deep dissection, causing troublesome bleeding and postoperative swelling. Lateral retraction with the deltoid is preferred by many as it preserves medial drainage. The fix: identify the vein early, develop the interval on either side, and protect it with a vessel loop or gentle retraction throughout.

Medial calcar & periosteal sleeve

Location: the inferomedial calcar carries the ascending branch of the anterior circumflex humeral artery and the critical periosteal supply to the head. Risk: aggressive medial dissection, excessive varus reduction, or failure to restore calcar support leads to varus collapse, screw cut-out and avascular necrosis. The fix: preserve all medial soft-tissue attachments, reduce the head to restore medial cortical continuity, and place at least one inferomedial calcar screw.

Greater tuberosity malreduction

Trap: accepting posterior or superior displacement of the greater tuberosity because the plate appears to hold the head. Consequence: even 5 mm of posterior displacement blocks external rotation and causes impingement; superior displacement blocks abduction. The fix: reduce the tuberosity under direct vision before plate application, hold it with suture augmentation through the supraspinatus and infraspinatus insertions, and confirm position with the image intensifier in multiple planes.

Intra-articular screw penetration

Trap: placing locking screws that penetrate the articular surface, especially in osteoporotic bone where tactile feedback is poor. Consequence: rapid chondrolysis, pain and early arthritis — the central and superior screws are most at risk. The fix: image in true AP, axillary and scapular-Y views after each screw; the 'light-bulb' sign on the axillary view confirms screws are extra-articular; use shorter screws if in any doubt.

Varus collapse in osteoporotic bone

Trap: relying on the locking plate alone in poor bone without calcar support or structural augmentation. Consequence: progressive varus, screw cut-out through the head and loss of reduction within weeks. The fix: always restore the medial calcar, use inferomedial support screws, consider bone graft or cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis, and plan for possible revision to arthroplasty if reduction cannot be maintained.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 62-year-old active man sustains a displaced 3-part proximal humerus fracture involving the surgical neck and greater tuberosity after a fall from standing height. The greater tuberosity is displaced 12 mm posteriorly and the head is in 30 degrees of varus. How do you decide between non-operative care, ORIF and arthroplasty?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“You have just applied a proximal humerus locking plate to a 4-part valgus-impacted fracture in a 58-year-old woman. After placing the inferomedial calcar screw and three proximal locking screws, the image intensifier shows one screw tip appearing intra-articular on the axillary view. What do you do?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 68-year-old woman with a 4-part proximal humerus fracture undergoes ORIF. At 3 months she has persistent pain and radiographs show progressive varus collapse with the head in 30 degrees of varus and the greater tuberosity displaced superiorly. What went wrong and what are the options now?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Proximal Humerus ORIF with Locking Plate — exam-day essentials

Indications — Neer criteria

  • Greater than 1 cm displacement or greater than 45 degrees angulation of any part defines a displaced fracture
  • Displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures in physiologically young patients with reconstructible bone are the primary indications for ORIF
  • Valgus-impacted 4-part fractures have a better vascular prognosis because the medial periosteal sleeve remains intact
  • Head-split fractures with greater than 40% articular involvement favour arthroplasty over ORIF
  • Patient age less than 65-70, good bone stock and high functional demand shift the balance toward reconstruction

Critical anatomy

  • Axillary nerve: 5-7 cm distal to the acromion on the deep deltoid surface — identify before distal dissection or plate placement
  • Cephalic vein: lies in the deltopectoral groove — preserve by developing the interval on either side
  • Medial calcar: carries the ascending branch of the anterior circumflex humeral artery — preserve all medial soft-tissue attachments
  • Greater tuberosity: supraspinatus and infraspinatus insertions — anatomic reduction mandatory (less than 5 mm displacement acceptable)
  • Rotator interval: between supraspinatus and subscapularis — the long head of biceps is the landmark for the bicipital groove

Operative sequence

  • Beach-chair position with the image intensifier from the contralateral side — confirm all views before incision
  • Deltopectoral approach, protect the cephalic vein, identify the axillary nerve at the inferior subscapularis border
  • Tag the rotator cuff insertions with non-absorbable sutures — these are the reduction handles
  • Reduce the greater tuberosity anatomically first, then the lesser tuberosity, then the head to the shaft while preserving the medial hinge
  • Apply the precontoured locking plate 5-8 mm distal to the greater tuberosity summit, slightly posterior to the bicipital groove
  • Place the inferomedial calcar screw first — the critical screw preventing varus collapse
  • Confirm all screws are extra-articular on true AP, axillary and scapular-Y views
  • Augment with rotator cuff sutures through the plate eyelets — converts deforming forces into compression

Danger zones

  • Axillary nerve: never place a plate or retractor distal to the nerve without visualisation
  • Medial calcar: aggressive dissection or varus reduction disrupts the periosteal blood supply — increases AVN risk
  • Greater tuberosity: accepting 5 mm of posterior or superior displacement blocks rotation and causes impingement
  • Intra-articular penetration: central and superior screws most at risk — confirm on the axillary view after each screw
  • Varus collapse: occurs when the calcar is not restored or the inferomedial support screw is omitted

Complications & prevention

  • Screw cut-out: 5-15% — confirm position on multiple fluoroscopic views; shorten central screws if in doubt
  • Varus collapse: 5-20% — restore the calcar, place an inferomedial screw, augment with sutures, consider graft in osteoporosis
  • Avascular necrosis: 5-20% — preserve the medial periosteal sleeve, avoid excessive stripping, accept stable valgus-impacted patterns
  • Axillary nerve injury: 2-5% — identify the nerve early, protect during retraction, limit distal plate extension
  • Stiffness: 10-30% — begin passive motion within the first week, protect tuberosity fixation with suture augmentation

Rehabilitation

  • Week 0-4: sling with abduction pillow, pendulum exercises, passive forward flexion to 90 degrees, active-assisted external rotation to 30 degrees
  • Week 4-8: discontinue sling, active-assisted to active motion, begin rotator cuff and deltoid isometrics
  • Week 8-16: progressive resistance strengthening, functional training, return to light work at 8-12 weeks
  • Expected outcomes: union 85-95%, forward flexion 120-150 degrees, external rotation 30-50 degrees
  • In osteoporosis: longer plate, cement augmentation, lower threshold for reverse arthroplasty if fixation is tenuous

Background & Evidence


Classification. The Neer system remains the working language for these fractures. A "part" is any segment displaced greater than 1 cm or angulated greater than 45 degrees; the number of parts drives both prognosis and the operative decision.

1-part
Definition
No segment displaced greater than 1 cm or angulated greater than 45 degrees
Typical management
Non-operative — sling and early mobilisation; 80-90% good to excellent outcomes
2-part
Definition
Surgical neck or a single tuberosity displaced; a surgical neck fracture with greater than 50% displacement or angulation greater than 45 degrees that fails closed reduction
Typical management
ORIF if displaced and unstable; a greater tuberosity displaced greater than 5 mm in a young active patient is fixed to avoid rotator cuff dysfunction
3-part
Definition
Head plus one displaced tuberosity
Typical management
ORIF with a locking plate in a physiologically young patient with reconstructible bone
4-part
Definition
Head plus both tuberosities displaced
Typical management
ORIF if reconstructible and young; arthroplasty for head-split, severe comminution or a low-demand elderly patient
Valgus-impacted 4-part
Definition
Head impacted into valgus with an intact medial periosteal sleeve
Typical management
Better vascular prognosis — often amenable to percutaneous or limited open fixation; non-operative care gives roughly 70% satisfactory function when the medial hinge is intact
Neer classification of proximal humerus fractures
PatternDefinitionTypical management
1-partNo segment displaced greater than 1 cm or angulated greater than 45 degreesNon-operative — sling and early mobilisation; 80-90% good to excellent outcomes
2-partSurgical neck or a single tuberosity displaced; a surgical neck fracture with greater than 50% displacement or angulation greater than 45 degrees that fails closed reductionORIF if displaced and unstable; a greater tuberosity displaced greater than 5 mm in a young active patient is fixed to avoid rotator cuff dysfunction
3-partHead plus one displaced tuberosityORIF with a locking plate in a physiologically young patient with reconstructible bone
4-partHead plus both tuberosities displacedORIF if reconstructible and young; arthroplasty for head-split, severe comminution or a low-demand elderly patient
Valgus-impacted 4-partHead impacted into valgus with an intact medial periosteal sleeveBetter vascular prognosis — often amenable to percutaneous or limited open fixation; non-operative care gives roughly 70% satisfactory function when the medial hinge is intact

Surgical anatomy relevant to fixation

  • Deltopectoral interval: the cephalic vein lies in the groove between deltoid (lateral) and pectoralis major (medial); the deltoid insertion is released only 1-2 cm if extra exposure is needed.
  • Axillary nerve: exits the quadrilateral space and wraps around the surgical neck on the deep surface of deltoid, lying 5-7 cm distal to the acromion; motor branches supply the anterior and middle deltoid, with a sensory branch to the lateral shoulder.
  • Blood supply to the head: the anterior circumflex humeral artery ascends in the bicipital groove and gives the arcuate artery that enters the head; the ascending branch runs along the medial calcar and provides critical perfusion through the periosteal sleeve. In 4-part fractures the head may be perfused solely through the medial periosteal attachments — aggressive medial dissection risks avascular necrosis.
  • Rotator cuff insertions: supraspinatus on the superior facet of the greater tuberosity, infraspinatus on the posterior facet, and subscapularis on the lesser tuberosity; non-absorbable sutures through these insertions are powerful reduction aids and augment plate fixation. Why locking plates, and what the trials say. Locking plates provide fixed-angle stability that tolerates early motion even in osteoporotic bone. Biomechanical work shows an inferomedial calcar screw reduces varus collapse by more than 50%, and clinical series report union rates of 85-95% when anatomic reduction and calcar support are achieved — though complications remain significant (screw cut-out 5-15%, avascular necrosis 5-20%, reoperation 10-25%). The PROFHER trial tempers enthusiasm for surgery across the board: in patients over 65 with displaced 2- and 3-part fractures, locking-plate fixation was no better than non-operative care in Oxford Shoulder Score at two years and carried more complications. The take-home is selective — ORIF for displaced 3- and 4-part fractures in physiologically young patients with reconstructible bone; non-operative care or arthroplasty for the low-demand elderly.

References


Evidence

Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial

Level I
Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, et al • JAMA (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Multicentre randomised controlled trial of 250 patients over 65 years with displaced 2-part or 3-part proximal humerus fractures.
  • No significant difference in Oxford Shoulder Score at 2 years between locking plate fixation and non-operative treatment.
  • Surgery was associated with more complications and reoperations; non-operative care is a reasonable option in lower-demand elderly patients.
Source: JAMA 2015;313(10):1037-47
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25756440)
Evidence

Proximal humeral fractures: a prospective multicenter study of 452 cases treated with locking plates

Level II
Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, et al • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective multicentre cohort of 452 patients treated with locking plates for proximal humerus fractures.
  • Union rate 95%, complication rate 19% (screw cut-out 5%, avascular necrosis 5%, infection 2%).
  • Calcar support and anatomic tuberosity reduction were the strongest predictors of good outcome.
Evidence

The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures

Level III
Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, et al • J Orthop Trauma (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Biomechanical and clinical study demonstrating that inferomedial screw placement reduces varus collapse by greater than 50%.
  • Absence of a calcar support screw was the strongest predictor of early failure in clinical series.
  • Medial comminution and loss of calcar continuity dramatically increase the risk of mechanical failure.
Evidence

Avascular necrosis after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures

Level II
Bastian JD, Hertel R • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 98 patients treated with ORIF for 3- and 4-part fractures.
  • Avascular necrosis developed in 14% of 3-part and 28% of 4-part fractures; risk was strongly associated with disruption of the medial periosteal hinge.
  • Preservation of the medial soft tissue attachments is the key modifiable factor in preventing head necrosis.
Evidence

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients

Level III
Cuff DJ, Pupello DR • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Comparative cohort study of 53 patients over 70 years with 3- or 4-part fractures treated with reverse versus hemiarthroplasty.
  • Reverse arthroplasty provided superior forward flexion, external rotation and patient satisfaction at 2 years.
  • Reverse arthroplasty is increasingly favoured in elderly patients with displaced 4-part fractures and poor bone quality.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Deltopectoral Approach to ShoulderAnterosuperior (Deltoid-Split) Approach to the Shoulder
Browse all procedures