Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Revision THA — Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Revision THA — Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting

Operative technique for femoral impaction bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty for cavitary femoral bone loss — indications, defect containment, sequential graft impaction, polished tapered cemented stem, Exeter/Slooff technique, complications and outcomes

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Morcellised allograft impaction with a polished tapered cemented stem for contained femoral defects · advanced

Paprosky II–IIIAThe indication
Polished taperedThe implant philosophy
5–15 percentIntraoperative fracture risk
180 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • The indication is contained cavitary femoral bone loss (Paprosky II–IIIA) in a younger patient where bone-stock restoration is the priority; uncontained segmental defects require mesh or strut containment before grafting, and Type IIIB/IV defects usually need a structural allograft, distal-fixation stem or custom implant.
  • The principle is to restore bone stock by impacting fresh-frozen morcellised allograft around a collarless polished tapered cemented stem (Exeter/Slooff technique); the graft incorporates by creeping substitution and the polished stem subsides 1–3 mm within the cement mantle to achieve a self-locking wedge — this is the opposite philosophy to a roughened or precoated stem that must achieve immediate cement interlock.
  • Critical technical steps: defect containment with mesh if needed, distal cement restrictor 2 cm beyond the planned stem tip, sequential impaction with increasing-diameter trials until the trial is axially and rotationally stable, then cementing the definitive polished tapered stem; intraoperative periprosthetic fracture risk is 5–15 percent and requires cerclage or plate fixation.
  • Outcomes: 85–95 percent survivorship free of aseptic loosening at 10–15 years with radiographic incorporation in experienced centres; subsidence greater than 5 mm, or progressive migration after 12 months, predicts failure and requires early revision.

When & Why


Indication. Femoral impaction bone grafting is a biological reconstruction for contained cavitary femoral bone loss — a loose stem sitting in an expanded, brittle-walled canal where the surrounding cortices still form a closed envelope. The goal is not just a stable stem today but restored proximal bone stock for the patient's future revisions. It is the operation of choice for the physiologically young revision candidate. Absolute indications - Contained cavitary femoral bone loss (Paprosky Type II or IIIA) in a patient younger than 65 years where restoration of bone stock is a priority for future revisions.

  • Failed primary or revision stem with contained osteolysis and adequate proximal femoral support for impaction.
  • Need for biological reconstruction rather than mechanical distal fixation in a physiologically young patient. Relative indications - Paprosky Type IIIA defects with greater than 4 cm of intact isthmus, when combined with mesh containment of any segmental component.
  • Patient preference for bone-stock restoration over an extensively porous-coated stem that sacrifices proximal bone.
  • Revision of a cemented stem where the cement mantle has failed but the surrounding bone is cavitary rather than segmental. Contraindications - Absolute: uncontained segmental defects (Paprosky IIIB or IV) that cannot be converted into a contained cavity with mesh or strut allograft; active periprosthetic joint infection; inadequate distal femoral isthmus (less than 4 cm) for stable trial impaction.
  • Relative: elderly low-demand patient where an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem offers faster recovery; severe osteoporosis with cortical thickness less than 2 mm (high fracture risk); previous pelvic radiation or a poor soft-tissue envelope increasing infection risk. The one decision that matters — which femoral reconstruction? Impaction grafting is one of three established strategies for the revision femur; the choice turns on whether the defect can be contained, how much isthmus remains, and whether the patient's priority is restored bone stock or early mobilisation.
Best defect type
Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
Contained cavitary (Paprosky II–IIIA)
Extensively porous-coated stem
Paprosky II–IIIA with adequate isthmus
Modular fluted tapered stem
Paprosky IIIB–IV or severe bone loss
Bone stock restoration
Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
Yes — biological reconstruction
Extensively porous-coated stem
No — proximal stress shielding
Modular fluted tapered stem
No — distal fixation only
Subsidence behaviour
Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
1–3 mm expected; greater than 5 mm = failure
Extensively porous-coated stem
Minimal if diaphyseal fit achieved
Modular fluted tapered stem
1–5 mm common; greater than 10 mm concerning
Intraoperative fracture
Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
5–15 percent (impaction trauma)
Extensively porous-coated stem
3–8 percent (reaming)
Modular fluted tapered stem
2–6 percent (broaching)
10-year survivorship
Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
85–95 percent (contained defects)
Extensively porous-coated stem
90–95 percent (adequate isthmus)
Modular fluted tapered stem
85–92 percent (severe defects)
Future revision ease
Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
Excellent — restored bone stock
Extensively porous-coated stem
Difficult — stress-shielded bone
Modular fluted tapered stem
Moderate — distal bone often preserved
Femoral reconstruction options in revision THA — how to choose
ParameterImpaction grafting + polished tapered stemExtensively porous-coated stemModular fluted tapered stem
Best defect typeContained cavitary (Paprosky II–IIIA)Paprosky II–IIIA with adequate isthmusPaprosky IIIB–IV or severe bone loss
Bone stock restorationYes — biological reconstructionNo — proximal stress shieldingNo — distal fixation only
Subsidence behaviour1–3 mm expected; greater than 5 mm = failureMinimal if diaphyseal fit achieved1–5 mm common; greater than 10 mm concerning
Intraoperative fracture5–15 percent (impaction trauma)3–8 percent (reaming)2–6 percent (broaching)
10-year survivorship85–95 percent (contained defects)90–95 percent (adequate isthmus)85–92 percent (severe defects)
Future revision easeExcellent — restored bone stockDifficult — stress-shielded boneModerate — distal bone often preserved

Consent specifically for intraoperative fracture (5–15 percent), subsidence (acceptable 1–3 mm; concerning greater than 5 mm), dislocation (5–10 percent), infection (2–5 percent), sciatic nerve injury (1–3 percent), leg-length discrepancy, and the possibility of converting intraoperatively to an alternative reconstruction if impaction grafting proves unstable. Setup. Lateral decubitus on a radiolucent table with the operative hip uppermost, pelvis stabilised with pubic and sacral supports so the limb moves freely and leg length can be assessed. Regional (spinal/epidural) plus general anaesthesia for muscle relaxation and controlled hypotension; invasive arterial monitoring for lengthy revisions. Tranexamic acid (1 g IV at induction and 1 g at closure) reduces blood loss. Have on the back table a full revision hip set, cerclage wires/cables, titanium or tantalum mesh, fresh-frozen morcellised allograft (minimum 4–6 femoral heads), distal cement restrictors, a polished tapered cemented stem system (Exeter or equivalent), and a backup modular fluted tapered stem.

The Operation


The goal is to convert an uncontained, defect-laden canal into a contained cavity, pack it densely with morcellised allograft, and cement a polished tapered stem into that restored envelope so the stem subsides 1–3 mm into a self-locking wedge while the graft revascularises by creeping substitution. The exposure is the posterior (Moore-Southern) approach — chosen because it gives extensile access to both femur and acetabulum and allows direct visualisation and protection of the sciatic nerve, which lies immediately posterior to the greater trochanter and is tethered by scar in revision surgery. An extended trochanteric osteotomy is added when distal cement removal or deformity correction is required. Neurovascular structures at risk through the case: the sciatic nerve posteriorly (traction or lengthening greater than 4 cm); the femoral nerve and profunda femoris artery anteriorly (during anterior-column exposure or mesh placement); and the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle (during an extended trochanteric osteotomy or abductor reconstruction). The abductor mechanism is frequently deficient or detached in revision surgery, so plan for a constrained liner or dual-mobility construct from the outset.

Femoral impaction grafting revision
Femoral revision total hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting and cerclage cables.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, exposure & sciatic nerve protection
  • Lateral decubitus, entire leg prepped and draped free for full range of motion and traction; re-confirm leg length and stability landmarks.
  • Develop the posterior approach through the previous incision where possible; the sciatic nerve is identified and protected with a vessel loop or Penrose drain throughout — it is tethered by scar in revision surgery and at risk from traction or lengthening greater than 4 cm.
  • Tag and preserve the posterior capsule and short external rotators for later repair.
Step 2Component & cement removal; canal debridement
  • Address the acetabulum first if both components are being revised.
  • Deliver the femur into the wound with gentle traction and external rotation; remove the stem and all cement using a cement extraction system, ultrasonic cement removal, or an extended trochanteric osteotomy if distal cement or deformity demands it.
  • Meticulously curette and burr every remnant of cement, membrane and osteolytic debris down to bleeding bone — residual membrane blocks graft incorporation. Send tissue for frozen section and culture to exclude occult infection before grafting.
Step 3Defect assessment (Paprosky) & containment
  • Classify the femoral defect by Paprosky type (see Background & Evidence). Impaction grafting is suited to Type II and IIIA contained defects.
  • Contain any segmental or uncontained defect — anterior, medial or posterior wall — with titanium mesh or strut allograft secured by cerclage wires/cables. The mesh must be stable and must convert the defect into a closed cavity before any graft is introduced.
  • Reconstruct or preserve the greater trochanter — abductor function determines stability and gait.
Step 4Distal cement restrictor
  • Place a distal cement restrictor 2 cm beyond the planned tip of the definitive stem.
  • This prevents graft escaping distally and allows pressurisation of the cement column. Too proximal and the reconstruction is hollow below the stem tip; too distal and unnecessary bone is sacrificed.
Step 5Graft preparation
  • Morsellise fresh-frozen femoral heads into 5–8 mm chips using a bone mill or rongeurs.
  • Lightly pack the chips; do not wash excessively — over-washing strips the osteoinductive factors the graft needs to incorporate.
Step 6Sequential impaction with trials — the core step
  • Introduce the graft into the contained defect in layers beginning distally, impacting each layer firmly before adding the next.
  • Perform sequential impaction with increasing-diameter trial stems. Advance each trial with firm axial blows until it seats at the planned level and demonstrates both axial and rotational stability, then move to the next larger trial until the final trial is stable.
  • In osteopenic bone or cortex thinner than 3 mm, place two or three prophylactic cerclage wires before impaction begins.
Step 7Confirm graft density
  • Remove the final trial and inspect the canal for any area of inadequate graft density; re-impact hollow zones until the graft bed is uniformly dense.
  • Palpate the femoral shaft continuously during every impaction pass — a sudden give or audible crack is a fracture until proven otherwise.
Step 8Cement the polished tapered stem
  • Irrigate and dry the canal once more. Mix polymethylmethacrylate and introduce it retrograde with a cement gun; pressurise thoroughly so it interdigitates with the impacted graft.
  • Insert the definitive collarless polished tapered stem (Exeter-type) to the predetermined depth and hold it until the cement has fully polymerised.
  • The stem is deliberately not bonded to the cement — it will subside 1–3 mm within the mantle over the first year to achieve its self-locking wedge. This subsidence is expected and desirable.
Step 9Trial reduction, stability & closure
  • Apply a trial head and reduce the hip; assess leg length, offset and stability through a full arc.
  • Evaluate abductor tension — if deficient, use a constrained liner or dual-mobility construct (often needed in revision given the long stem and previously violated posterior capsule).
  • Repair the posterior capsule and short external rotators to the greater trochanter, place drains, and close in layers.
The two dangers of impaction — fracture and the uncontained defect

Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture occurs at the tip of the impaction trials or during cement pressurisation in 5–15 percent of cases. Palpate the shaft on every impaction pass, place prophylactic cerclage when the cortex is less than 3 mm, and have wires and a locking plate open on the back table for every case. The second danger is graft escape: an uncontained medial or anterior wall defect lets graft leak into soft tissue and produces a hollow reconstruction. Mesh or strut allograft must convert every defect into a closed cavity before the first chip is impacted.

Continuous shaft palpation is the fracture early-warning system

Impact in roughly 1 cm layers from distal to proximal, advancing each trial until it no longer moves with firm blows. Keep one hand on the femoral shaft throughout — any sudden give or crack mandates immediate exposure and cerclage before continuing. A low threshold for prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic bone is the single best fracture-prevention habit.

Why the polished tapered stem subsides — and why that is success, not failure

The Exeter polished tapered stem is deliberately non-bonded to the cement. Under load it tapers further into the mantle and subsides 1–3 mm over the first 6–12 months, wedging itself into a self-locking position while maintaining compressive cement stresses. This is the fixation philosophy — the opposite of a roughened or precoated stem, which depends on immediate mechanical interlock and is more prone to cement-mantle fracture if it debonds. Normal subsidence is 1–3 mm and stabilises by a year; greater than 5 mm, or progressive migration after 12 months, means the construct has failed.

Accept no unstable construct

After cement polymerisation, attempt to rotate and axially load the stem. Any movement means the cement mantle or graft construct is inadequate — revise immediately rather than accept a compromised reconstruction. Likewise, never cement over a trial that is not both axially and rotationally stable; if stability cannot be achieved, convert to the backup modular fluted tapered stem.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation — protected weight-bearing is mandatory; early full weight-bearing increases fracture and subsidence risk even with a stable reconstruction. | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing | Precautions & milestones | |------|--------|----------------|--------------------------| | 1 | 0–6 weeks | Touch or 20 kg partial weight-bearing | Posterior hip precautions; drain out at 24–48 h; wound review at 14–16 days | | 2 | 6–12 weeks | Progress to full weight-bearing by 12 weeks | Posterior precautions continue to 12 weeks; DVT prophylaxis for 35 days | | 3 | 3–6 months | Full, light activity | Driving once an emergency stop is safe (about 6–8 weeks); sedentary work | | 4 | 6 months onward | Full | Low-impact sport only; avoid running or jumping indefinitely; manual work from 6 months | Radiographic surveillance. Films at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, then annually for 5 years and every 2 years thereafter. Assess graft incorporation (hazy interface at 3 months becoming trabecular continuity by 6–12 months, with remodelling to normal density by 2–3 years), stem subsidence (acceptable 1–3 mm; concerning greater than 5 mm), cement-mantle integrity, and any lucent lines. Long-term outcomes. 85–95 percent survivorship free of aseptic loosening at 10–15 years in contained defects performed in high-volume centres. Outcomes are inferior when mesh is required for segmental defects or when an intraoperative fracture occurs. The defining advantage over distal-fixation stems is that successful impaction grafting restores proximal bone stock, making the patient's next revision technically easier. Complications

Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture
Incidence
5–15 percent
Recognition
Sudden loss of resistance during impaction; audible crack; visible cortical split on inspection or fluoroscopy
Prevention and management
Prevention: prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic or less-than-3 mm cortex; continuous shaft palpation; low threshold for extended trochanteric osteotomy if deformity. Management: expose, reduce and cerclage or locking-plate fixation; continue impaction only if the fracture is stable after fixation
Postoperative periprosthetic fracture
Incidence
3–8 percent
Recognition
Fall or minor trauma in the first 3 months; thigh pain and inability to bear weight; radiographic cortical discontinuity
Prevention and management
Prevention: protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks. Management: Vancouver B1 or C treated with locking plate; B2 or B3 usually revised to a longer stem or modular fluted tapered stem
Stem subsidence greater than 5 mm
Incidence
4–10 percent
Recognition
Progressive distal migration on serial radiographs; thigh pain; leg-length discrepancy
Prevention and management
Prevention: adequate graft density and trial stability before cementing; protected weight-bearing. Management: if progressive after 12 months or with cement-mantle fracture, early revision before catastrophic failure
Dislocation
Incidence
5–10 percent
Recognition
Posterior dislocation most common; patient reports a pop and cannot bear weight; radiographic confirmation
Prevention and management
Prevention: large-diameter head (36–40 mm); adequate abductor tension; posterior capsule repair; constrained liner or dual-mobility in abductor-deficient hips. Management: closed reduction if stable; revision to constrained liner or dual-mobility if recurrent
Infection
Incidence
2–5 percent
Recognition
Persistent wound drainage; elevated CRP and ESR; sinus tract; positive aspiration culture
Prevention and management
Prevention: meticulous debridement; antibiotic-loaded cement in high-risk cases; tranexamic acid to reduce haematoma. Management: debridement, antibiotics and implant retention if early; two-stage revision if chronic or loose
Graft resorption without incorporation
Incidence
3–7 percent
Recognition
Progressive lucency at the graft–host interface greater than 2 mm; loss of graft density; stem migration
Prevention and management
Prevention: fresh-frozen (not irradiated) morcellised allograft; contained defect; adequate impaction density. Management: observe if the stem is stable; revise with an alternative reconstruction if the stem is migrating
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention and management
Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture5–15 percentSudden loss of resistance during impaction; audible crack; visible cortical split on inspection or fluoroscopyPrevention: prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic or less-than-3 mm cortex; continuous shaft palpation; low threshold for extended trochanteric osteotomy if deformity. Management: expose, reduce and cerclage or locking-plate fixation; continue impaction only if the fracture is stable after fixation
Postoperative periprosthetic fracture3–8 percentFall or minor trauma in the first 3 months; thigh pain and inability to bear weight; radiographic cortical discontinuityPrevention: protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks. Management: Vancouver B1 or C treated with locking plate; B2 or B3 usually revised to a longer stem or modular fluted tapered stem
Stem subsidence greater than 5 mm4–10 percentProgressive distal migration on serial radiographs; thigh pain; leg-length discrepancyPrevention: adequate graft density and trial stability before cementing; protected weight-bearing. Management: if progressive after 12 months or with cement-mantle fracture, early revision before catastrophic failure
Dislocation5–10 percentPosterior dislocation most common; patient reports a pop and cannot bear weight; radiographic confirmationPrevention: large-diameter head (36–40 mm); adequate abductor tension; posterior capsule repair; constrained liner or dual-mobility in abductor-deficient hips. Management: closed reduction if stable; revision to constrained liner or dual-mobility if recurrent
Infection2–5 percentPersistent wound drainage; elevated CRP and ESR; sinus tract; positive aspiration culturePrevention: meticulous debridement; antibiotic-loaded cement in high-risk cases; tranexamic acid to reduce haematoma. Management: debridement, antibiotics and implant retention if early; two-stage revision if chronic or loose
Graft resorption without incorporation3–7 percentProgressive lucency at the graft–host interface greater than 2 mm; loss of graft density; stem migrationPrevention: fresh-frozen (not irradiated) morcellised allograft; contained defect; adequate impaction density. Management: observe if the stem is stable; revise with an alternative reconstruction if the stem is migrating

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

IMPACTIMPACT — femoral impaction bone grafting sequence

I
Indications
Contained cavitary defects Paprosky II–IIIA in younger patients where bone-stock restoration is desired; uncontained defects require mesh first
M
Mesh containment
Contain any segmental or uncontained defect with mesh before graft insertion; place the distal cement restrictor 2 cm beyond the planned stem tip
P
Prepare graft
Fresh-frozen morcellised allograft as 5–8 mm chips; avoid excessive washing that removes osteoinductive factors
A
Augment the wall
Augment any anterior or medial wall with strut allograft or mesh; prophylactic cerclage in thin cortices before impaction
C
Cement the stem
Cement the polished tapered stem (Exeter philosophy) after sequential impaction until the trial is axially and rotationally stable; pressurise cement thoroughly
T
Three months protected
Three-month protected weight-bearing; serial radiographs to confirm graft incorporation and acceptable subsidence less than 5 mm

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 62-year-old man with a loose cemented femoral stem and a Paprosky Type IIIA femoral defect presents for revision. He is otherwise fit and wishes to preserve bone stock for potential future revisions. Discuss your choice of reconstruction and the key technical steps of femoral impaction bone grafting.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“Six months after femoral impaction bone grafting the patient reports new thigh pain and radiographs show 7 mm of stem subsidence with a cement mantle fracture. What is your diagnosis and management plan?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“You are planning revision THA in a 58-year-old woman with Paprosky Type II femoral bone loss. She has a history of multiple previous operations and a poor soft-tissue envelope. Compare impaction bone grafting with a modular fluted tapered stem and justify your choice.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Revision THA — femoral impaction bone grafting — exam-day essentials

Key indications

  • Contained cavitary defects (Paprosky II–IIIA) in younger patients where bone-stock restoration is the priority
  • Failed cemented stem with osteolysis but intact proximal support and isthmus greater than 4 cm
  • Uncontained segmental defects require mesh or strut containment before impaction grafting is feasible
  • Paprosky IIIB (less than 4 cm isthmus) or IV defects are not suitable for impaction grafting alone

Defect classification

  • Paprosky Type II: contained cavitary loss, intact isthmus greater than 4 cm — ideal for impaction grafting
  • Type IIIA: greater than 4 cm isthmus with contained loss; mesh for any segmental component
  • Type IIIB: less than 4 cm isthmus — the trial stem cannot achieve rotational stability; modular fluted tapered stem preferred
  • The medial calcar and metaphyseal cortices form the contained envelope; any breach requires mesh containment

Operative technique — critical steps

  • Meticulous removal of all cement and membrane to bleeding bone — residual membrane blocks incorporation
  • Mesh containment of any uncontained defect before any graft is introduced
  • Distal cement restrictor placed 2 cm beyond the planned stem tip
  • Sequential impaction with increasing-diameter trials until axial and rotational stability is achieved
  • Prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic bone or cortex less than 3 mm thick
  • Polished tapered stem (Exeter philosophy) cemented after thorough pressurisation; subsidence of 1–3 mm is expected

Danger zones

  • Intraoperative fracture (5–15 percent): continuous shaft palpation; low threshold for prophylactic cerclage
  • Graft escape through an uncontained defect: mesh must be secure before impaction begins
  • Sciatic nerve injury: identify and protect throughout the posterior approach revision
  • Excessive subsidence (greater than 5 mm): indicates failed incorporation or inadequate impaction density

Complications

  • Intraoperative fracture 5–15 percent: cerclage or plate fixation, then continue or convert the reconstruction
  • Postoperative fracture 3–8 percent: protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks reduces the risk
  • Stem subsidence greater than 5 mm, or progressive after 12 months: early revision indicated
  • Dislocation 5–10 percent: large head, abductor repair, consider constrained or dual-mobility liner
  • Infection 2–5 percent: meticulous debridement and antibiotic-loaded cement in high-risk cases

Post-operative protocol and outcomes

  • Touch weight-bearing for 6 weeks, then progressive to full by 12 weeks; posterior precautions for 12 weeks
  • Radiographic surveillance at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, then annually; graft incorporation by 6–12 months
  • 85–95 percent survivorship at 10–15 years for contained defects in experienced centres
  • Successful impaction grafting restores bone stock for future revisions — the primary long-term advantage

Evidence and landmark studies

  • Slooff 1996: original Nijmegen description; 92 percent survivorship at 5 years
  • Schreurs 2004: 85 percent survivorship at 10 years; fracture and subsidence as predictors of failure
  • Halliday 2003 (Exeter): deliberate subsidence of the polished stem is part of the fixation philosophy
  • van der Donk 2009: pooled data 87 percent survivorship; better outcomes with contained defects

Background & Evidence


Principle and rationale. Fresh-frozen morcellised allograft impacted densely around a polished tapered cemented stem restores proximal femoral bone stock by creeping substitution — the graft is progressively revascularised and remodelled by host osteoclasts and osteoblasts until it is replaced by living bone, while maintaining structural support to the stem during incorporation. The polished stem is deliberately non-bonded to the cement and subsides within the mantle to achieve a self-locking wedge; this is the opposite philosophy to a roughened or precoated stem that depends on immediate cement interlock. The Exeter and Nijmegen (Slooff) groups pioneered the technique, reporting greater than 85 percent survivorship at 10–15 years for contained defects. Why the defect must be contained. The medial calcar and the anterior and posterior metaphyseal cortices form the envelope that holds the graft under load. In revision surgery the calcar is often deficient or sclerotic, so mesh or strut augmentation is required to restore containment before any graft is introduced. The isthmus — the narrowest point of the diaphysis — provides the distal anchor for the trial during impaction; a minimum of 4 cm of intact isthmus is required for stable trial seating, and the anterior femoral bow must be respected when selecting stem length to avoid anterior cortical perforation. Paprosky femoral defect classification — the map that drives reconstruction choice.

I
Defect and isthmus
Minimal bone loss; intact metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone
Implication for impaction grafting
Primary stem or simple cementless revision suffices; impaction grafting not indicated
II
Defect and isthmus
Contained cavitary loss; intact proximal support; isthmus greater than 4 cm
Implication for impaction grafting
Classic indication for impaction bone grafting
IIIA
Defect and isthmus
Greater than 4 cm of intact isthmus with contained loss
Implication for impaction grafting
Impaction grafting feasible; mesh-contain any segmental component
IIIB
Defect and isthmus
Less than 4 cm of intact isthmus
Implication for impaction grafting
Trial stem cannot achieve rotational stability; modular fluted tapered stem or structural allograft preferred
IV
Defect and isthmus
Complete loss of the proximal femur with no supportive isthmus
Implication for impaction grafting
Custom tumour prosthesis, allograft-prosthetic composite or proximal femoral replacement required; impaction grafting contraindicated
Paprosky femoral defect classification
TypeDefect and isthmusImplication for impaction grafting
IMinimal bone loss; intact metaphyseal and diaphyseal bonePrimary stem or simple cementless revision suffices; impaction grafting not indicated
IIContained cavitary loss; intact proximal support; isthmus greater than 4 cmClassic indication for impaction bone grafting
IIIAGreater than 4 cm of intact isthmus with contained lossImpaction grafting feasible; mesh-contain any segmental component
IIIBLess than 4 cm of intact isthmusTrial stem cannot achieve rotational stability; modular fluted tapered stem or structural allograft preferred
IVComplete loss of the proximal femur with no supportive isthmusCustom tumour prosthesis, allograft-prosthetic composite or proximal femoral replacement required; impaction grafting contraindicated

References


Evidence

Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement

Level IV
Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RSM • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Exeter series of 57 impaction grafting revisions with mean 10-year follow-up
  • 88 percent survivorship free of aseptic loosening; mean subsidence 2.1 mm at 10 years
  • Confirmed that deliberate subsidence of the polished stem within the cement mantle is part of the fixation philosophy and does not equate to failure
Clinical implication: The Exeter polished tapered stem is the implant of choice for impaction grafting; subsidence of 1–3 mm is expected and desirable for long-term stability.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Aug;85(6):809-17
Verify on PubMed (PMID 12931796)
Evidence

The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty

Level IV
Sierra RJ, Charity J, Tsiridis E, Timperley JA, Gie GA • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Long cemented stems with impaction grafting provide reliable fixation in revision THA with severe proximal bone loss
  • Low rate of subsidence and good incorporation when technique is meticulous
Clinical implication: Longer stems can be used safely with impaction grafting when proximal bone stock is deficient but the distal isthmus is adequate.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1330-6
Verify on PubMed (PMID 18519328)
Evidence

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem: fifteen to twenty years follow-up

Level IV
te Stroet MA, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Rijnen WH, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012)
Key Findings:
  • 15–20 year follow-up of femoral impaction grafting with a polished cemented stem shows durable results
  • Survivorship remains high with proper patient selection and technique; graft incorporation is maintained long-term
Clinical implication: Impaction grafting provides lasting bone-stock restoration; long-term data support its use in younger patients.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 5;94(23):e1731-4
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23224393)
Evidence

Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem

Level IV
Heyligers IC, Schreurs BW, van Haaren EH • Oper Orthop Traumatol (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Step-by-step technique description and outcomes of impaction grafting with a polished tapered stem
  • Emphasises the importance of graft preparation, sequential impaction and protected weight-bearing
Clinical implication: A standardised technique with fresh-frozen allograft and a polished stem yields reproducible results in contained defects.
Source: Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Apr;26(2):156-61
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24699925)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Hip Posterior Approach (Moore/Southern)Extended Iliofemoral Approach to the Acetabulum
Browse all procedures