Morcellised allograft impaction with a polished tapered cemented stem for contained femoral defects · advanced
- The indication is contained cavitary femoral bone loss (Paprosky II–IIIA) in a younger patient where bone-stock restoration is the priority; uncontained segmental defects require mesh or strut containment before grafting, and Type IIIB/IV defects usually need a structural allograft, distal-fixation stem or custom implant.
- The principle is to restore bone stock by impacting fresh-frozen morcellised allograft around a collarless polished tapered cemented stem (Exeter/Slooff technique); the graft incorporates by creeping substitution and the polished stem subsides 1–3 mm within the cement mantle to achieve a self-locking wedge — this is the opposite philosophy to a roughened or precoated stem that must achieve immediate cement interlock.
- Critical technical steps: defect containment with mesh if needed, distal cement restrictor 2 cm beyond the planned stem tip, sequential impaction with increasing-diameter trials until the trial is axially and rotationally stable, then cementing the definitive polished tapered stem; intraoperative periprosthetic fracture risk is 5–15 percent and requires cerclage or plate fixation.
- Outcomes: 85–95 percent survivorship free of aseptic loosening at 10–15 years with radiographic incorporation in experienced centres; subsidence greater than 5 mm, or progressive migration after 12 months, predicts failure and requires early revision.
When & Why
Indication. Femoral impaction bone grafting is a biological reconstruction for contained cavitary femoral bone loss — a loose stem sitting in an expanded, brittle-walled canal where the surrounding cortices still form a closed envelope. The goal is not just a stable stem today but restored proximal bone stock for the patient's future revisions. It is the operation of choice for the physiologically young revision candidate. Absolute indications - Contained cavitary femoral bone loss (Paprosky Type II or IIIA) in a patient younger than 65 years where restoration of bone stock is a priority for future revisions.
- Failed primary or revision stem with contained osteolysis and adequate proximal femoral support for impaction.
- Need for biological reconstruction rather than mechanical distal fixation in a physiologically young patient. Relative indications - Paprosky Type IIIA defects with greater than 4 cm of intact isthmus, when combined with mesh containment of any segmental component.
- Patient preference for bone-stock restoration over an extensively porous-coated stem that sacrifices proximal bone.
- Revision of a cemented stem where the cement mantle has failed but the surrounding bone is cavitary rather than segmental. Contraindications - Absolute: uncontained segmental defects (Paprosky IIIB or IV) that cannot be converted into a contained cavity with mesh or strut allograft; active periprosthetic joint infection; inadequate distal femoral isthmus (less than 4 cm) for stable trial impaction.
- Relative: elderly low-demand patient where an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem offers faster recovery; severe osteoporosis with cortical thickness less than 2 mm (high fracture risk); previous pelvic radiation or a poor soft-tissue envelope increasing infection risk. The one decision that matters — which femoral reconstruction? Impaction grafting is one of three established strategies for the revision femur; the choice turns on whether the defect can be contained, how much isthmus remains, and whether the patient's priority is restored bone stock or early mobilisation.
- Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
- Contained cavitary (Paprosky II–IIIA)
- Extensively porous-coated stem
- Paprosky II–IIIA with adequate isthmus
- Modular fluted tapered stem
- Paprosky IIIB–IV or severe bone loss
- Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
- Yes — biological reconstruction
- Extensively porous-coated stem
- No — proximal stress shielding
- Modular fluted tapered stem
- No — distal fixation only
- Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
- 1–3 mm expected; greater than 5 mm = failure
- Extensively porous-coated stem
- Minimal if diaphyseal fit achieved
- Modular fluted tapered stem
- 1–5 mm common; greater than 10 mm concerning
- Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
- 5–15 percent (impaction trauma)
- Extensively porous-coated stem
- 3–8 percent (reaming)
- Modular fluted tapered stem
- 2–6 percent (broaching)
- Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
- 85–95 percent (contained defects)
- Extensively porous-coated stem
- 90–95 percent (adequate isthmus)
- Modular fluted tapered stem
- 85–92 percent (severe defects)
- Impaction grafting + polished tapered stem
- Excellent — restored bone stock
- Extensively porous-coated stem
- Difficult — stress-shielded bone
- Modular fluted tapered stem
- Moderate — distal bone often preserved
Consent specifically for intraoperative fracture (5–15 percent), subsidence (acceptable 1–3 mm; concerning greater than 5 mm), dislocation (5–10 percent), infection (2–5 percent), sciatic nerve injury (1–3 percent), leg-length discrepancy, and the possibility of converting intraoperatively to an alternative reconstruction if impaction grafting proves unstable. Setup. Lateral decubitus on a radiolucent table with the operative hip uppermost, pelvis stabilised with pubic and sacral supports so the limb moves freely and leg length can be assessed. Regional (spinal/epidural) plus general anaesthesia for muscle relaxation and controlled hypotension; invasive arterial monitoring for lengthy revisions. Tranexamic acid (1 g IV at induction and 1 g at closure) reduces blood loss. Have on the back table a full revision hip set, cerclage wires/cables, titanium or tantalum mesh, fresh-frozen morcellised allograft (minimum 4–6 femoral heads), distal cement restrictors, a polished tapered cemented stem system (Exeter or equivalent), and a backup modular fluted tapered stem.
The Operation
The goal is to convert an uncontained, defect-laden canal into a contained cavity, pack it densely with morcellised allograft, and cement a polished tapered stem into that restored envelope so the stem subsides 1–3 mm into a self-locking wedge while the graft revascularises by creeping substitution. The exposure is the posterior (Moore-Southern) approach — chosen because it gives extensile access to both femur and acetabulum and allows direct visualisation and protection of the sciatic nerve, which lies immediately posterior to the greater trochanter and is tethered by scar in revision surgery. An extended trochanteric osteotomy is added when distal cement removal or deformity correction is required. Neurovascular structures at risk through the case: the sciatic nerve posteriorly (traction or lengthening greater than 4 cm); the femoral nerve and profunda femoris artery anteriorly (during anterior-column exposure or mesh placement); and the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle (during an extended trochanteric osteotomy or abductor reconstruction). The abductor mechanism is frequently deficient or detached in revision surgery, so plan for a constrained liner or dual-mobility construct from the outset.

Operative sequence
- Lateral decubitus, entire leg prepped and draped free for full range of motion and traction; re-confirm leg length and stability landmarks.
- Develop the posterior approach through the previous incision where possible; the sciatic nerve is identified and protected with a vessel loop or Penrose drain throughout — it is tethered by scar in revision surgery and at risk from traction or lengthening greater than 4 cm.
- Tag and preserve the posterior capsule and short external rotators for later repair.
- Address the acetabulum first if both components are being revised.
- Deliver the femur into the wound with gentle traction and external rotation; remove the stem and all cement using a cement extraction system, ultrasonic cement removal, or an extended trochanteric osteotomy if distal cement or deformity demands it.
- Meticulously curette and burr every remnant of cement, membrane and osteolytic debris down to bleeding bone — residual membrane blocks graft incorporation. Send tissue for frozen section and culture to exclude occult infection before grafting.
- Classify the femoral defect by Paprosky type (see Background & Evidence). Impaction grafting is suited to Type II and IIIA contained defects.
- Contain any segmental or uncontained defect — anterior, medial or posterior wall — with titanium mesh or strut allograft secured by cerclage wires/cables. The mesh must be stable and must convert the defect into a closed cavity before any graft is introduced.
- Reconstruct or preserve the greater trochanter — abductor function determines stability and gait.
- Place a distal cement restrictor 2 cm beyond the planned tip of the definitive stem.
- This prevents graft escaping distally and allows pressurisation of the cement column. Too proximal and the reconstruction is hollow below the stem tip; too distal and unnecessary bone is sacrificed.
- Morsellise fresh-frozen femoral heads into 5–8 mm chips using a bone mill or rongeurs.
- Lightly pack the chips; do not wash excessively — over-washing strips the osteoinductive factors the graft needs to incorporate.
- Introduce the graft into the contained defect in layers beginning distally, impacting each layer firmly before adding the next.
- Perform sequential impaction with increasing-diameter trial stems. Advance each trial with firm axial blows until it seats at the planned level and demonstrates both axial and rotational stability, then move to the next larger trial until the final trial is stable.
- In osteopenic bone or cortex thinner than 3 mm, place two or three prophylactic cerclage wires before impaction begins.
- Remove the final trial and inspect the canal for any area of inadequate graft density; re-impact hollow zones until the graft bed is uniformly dense.
- Palpate the femoral shaft continuously during every impaction pass — a sudden give or audible crack is a fracture until proven otherwise.
- Irrigate and dry the canal once more. Mix polymethylmethacrylate and introduce it retrograde with a cement gun; pressurise thoroughly so it interdigitates with the impacted graft.
- Insert the definitive collarless polished tapered stem (Exeter-type) to the predetermined depth and hold it until the cement has fully polymerised.
- The stem is deliberately not bonded to the cement — it will subside 1–3 mm within the mantle over the first year to achieve its self-locking wedge. This subsidence is expected and desirable.
- Apply a trial head and reduce the hip; assess leg length, offset and stability through a full arc.
- Evaluate abductor tension — if deficient, use a constrained liner or dual-mobility construct (often needed in revision given the long stem and previously violated posterior capsule).
- Repair the posterior capsule and short external rotators to the greater trochanter, place drains, and close in layers.
Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture occurs at the tip of the impaction trials or during cement pressurisation in 5–15 percent of cases. Palpate the shaft on every impaction pass, place prophylactic cerclage when the cortex is less than 3 mm, and have wires and a locking plate open on the back table for every case. The second danger is graft escape: an uncontained medial or anterior wall defect lets graft leak into soft tissue and produces a hollow reconstruction. Mesh or strut allograft must convert every defect into a closed cavity before the first chip is impacted.
Impact in roughly 1 cm layers from distal to proximal, advancing each trial until it no longer moves with firm blows. Keep one hand on the femoral shaft throughout — any sudden give or crack mandates immediate exposure and cerclage before continuing. A low threshold for prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic bone is the single best fracture-prevention habit.
The Exeter polished tapered stem is deliberately non-bonded to the cement. Under load it tapers further into the mantle and subsides 1–3 mm over the first 6–12 months, wedging itself into a self-locking position while maintaining compressive cement stresses. This is the fixation philosophy — the opposite of a roughened or precoated stem, which depends on immediate mechanical interlock and is more prone to cement-mantle fracture if it debonds. Normal subsidence is 1–3 mm and stabilises by a year; greater than 5 mm, or progressive migration after 12 months, means the construct has failed.
After cement polymerisation, attempt to rotate and axially load the stem. Any movement means the cement mantle or graft construct is inadequate — revise immediately rather than accept a compromised reconstruction. Likewise, never cement over a trial that is not both axially and rotationally stable; if stability cannot be achieved, convert to the backup modular fluted tapered stem.
Aftercare & Complications
Rehabilitation — protected weight-bearing is mandatory; early full weight-bearing increases fracture and subsidence risk even with a stable reconstruction. | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing | Precautions & milestones | |------|--------|----------------|--------------------------| | 1 | 0–6 weeks | Touch or 20 kg partial weight-bearing | Posterior hip precautions; drain out at 24–48 h; wound review at 14–16 days | | 2 | 6–12 weeks | Progress to full weight-bearing by 12 weeks | Posterior precautions continue to 12 weeks; DVT prophylaxis for 35 days | | 3 | 3–6 months | Full, light activity | Driving once an emergency stop is safe (about 6–8 weeks); sedentary work | | 4 | 6 months onward | Full | Low-impact sport only; avoid running or jumping indefinitely; manual work from 6 months | Radiographic surveillance. Films at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, then annually for 5 years and every 2 years thereafter. Assess graft incorporation (hazy interface at 3 months becoming trabecular continuity by 6–12 months, with remodelling to normal density by 2–3 years), stem subsidence (acceptable 1–3 mm; concerning greater than 5 mm), cement-mantle integrity, and any lucent lines. Long-term outcomes. 85–95 percent survivorship free of aseptic loosening at 10–15 years in contained defects performed in high-volume centres. Outcomes are inferior when mesh is required for segmental defects or when an intraoperative fracture occurs. The defining advantage over distal-fixation stems is that successful impaction grafting restores proximal bone stock, making the patient's next revision technically easier. Complications
- Incidence
- 5–15 percent
- Recognition
- Sudden loss of resistance during impaction; audible crack; visible cortical split on inspection or fluoroscopy
- Prevention and management
- Prevention: prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic or less-than-3 mm cortex; continuous shaft palpation; low threshold for extended trochanteric osteotomy if deformity. Management: expose, reduce and cerclage or locking-plate fixation; continue impaction only if the fracture is stable after fixation
- Incidence
- 3–8 percent
- Recognition
- Fall or minor trauma in the first 3 months; thigh pain and inability to bear weight; radiographic cortical discontinuity
- Prevention and management
- Prevention: protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks. Management: Vancouver B1 or C treated with locking plate; B2 or B3 usually revised to a longer stem or modular fluted tapered stem
- Incidence
- 4–10 percent
- Recognition
- Progressive distal migration on serial radiographs; thigh pain; leg-length discrepancy
- Prevention and management
- Prevention: adequate graft density and trial stability before cementing; protected weight-bearing. Management: if progressive after 12 months or with cement-mantle fracture, early revision before catastrophic failure
- Incidence
- 5–10 percent
- Recognition
- Posterior dislocation most common; patient reports a pop and cannot bear weight; radiographic confirmation
- Prevention and management
- Prevention: large-diameter head (36–40 mm); adequate abductor tension; posterior capsule repair; constrained liner or dual-mobility in abductor-deficient hips. Management: closed reduction if stable; revision to constrained liner or dual-mobility if recurrent
- Incidence
- 2–5 percent
- Recognition
- Persistent wound drainage; elevated CRP and ESR; sinus tract; positive aspiration culture
- Prevention and management
- Prevention: meticulous debridement; antibiotic-loaded cement in high-risk cases; tranexamic acid to reduce haematoma. Management: debridement, antibiotics and implant retention if early; two-stage revision if chronic or loose
- Incidence
- 3–7 percent
- Recognition
- Progressive lucency at the graft–host interface greater than 2 mm; loss of graft density; stem migration
- Prevention and management
- Prevention: fresh-frozen (not irradiated) morcellised allograft; contained defect; adequate impaction density. Management: observe if the stem is stable; revise with an alternative reconstruction if the stem is migrating
Viva & Exam Focus
IMPACTIMPACT — femoral impaction bone grafting sequence
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 62-year-old man with a loose cemented femoral stem and a Paprosky Type IIIA femoral defect presents for revision. He is otherwise fit and wishes to preserve bone stock for potential future revisions. Discuss your choice of reconstruction and the key technical steps of femoral impaction bone grafting.”
“Six months after femoral impaction bone grafting the patient reports new thigh pain and radiographs show 7 mm of stem subsidence with a cement mantle fracture. What is your diagnosis and management plan?”
“You are planning revision THA in a 58-year-old woman with Paprosky Type II femoral bone loss. She has a history of multiple previous operations and a poor soft-tissue envelope. Compare impaction bone grafting with a modular fluted tapered stem and justify your choice.”
Key indications
- Contained cavitary defects (Paprosky II–IIIA) in younger patients where bone-stock restoration is the priority
- Failed cemented stem with osteolysis but intact proximal support and isthmus greater than 4 cm
- Uncontained segmental defects require mesh or strut containment before impaction grafting is feasible
- Paprosky IIIB (less than 4 cm isthmus) or IV defects are not suitable for impaction grafting alone
Defect classification
- Paprosky Type II: contained cavitary loss, intact isthmus greater than 4 cm — ideal for impaction grafting
- Type IIIA: greater than 4 cm isthmus with contained loss; mesh for any segmental component
- Type IIIB: less than 4 cm isthmus — the trial stem cannot achieve rotational stability; modular fluted tapered stem preferred
- The medial calcar and metaphyseal cortices form the contained envelope; any breach requires mesh containment
Operative technique — critical steps
- Meticulous removal of all cement and membrane to bleeding bone — residual membrane blocks incorporation
- Mesh containment of any uncontained defect before any graft is introduced
- Distal cement restrictor placed 2 cm beyond the planned stem tip
- Sequential impaction with increasing-diameter trials until axial and rotational stability is achieved
- Prophylactic cerclage in osteopenic bone or cortex less than 3 mm thick
- Polished tapered stem (Exeter philosophy) cemented after thorough pressurisation; subsidence of 1–3 mm is expected
Danger zones
- Intraoperative fracture (5–15 percent): continuous shaft palpation; low threshold for prophylactic cerclage
- Graft escape through an uncontained defect: mesh must be secure before impaction begins
- Sciatic nerve injury: identify and protect throughout the posterior approach revision
- Excessive subsidence (greater than 5 mm): indicates failed incorporation or inadequate impaction density
Complications
- Intraoperative fracture 5–15 percent: cerclage or plate fixation, then continue or convert the reconstruction
- Postoperative fracture 3–8 percent: protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks reduces the risk
- Stem subsidence greater than 5 mm, or progressive after 12 months: early revision indicated
- Dislocation 5–10 percent: large head, abductor repair, consider constrained or dual-mobility liner
- Infection 2–5 percent: meticulous debridement and antibiotic-loaded cement in high-risk cases
Post-operative protocol and outcomes
- Touch weight-bearing for 6 weeks, then progressive to full by 12 weeks; posterior precautions for 12 weeks
- Radiographic surveillance at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, then annually; graft incorporation by 6–12 months
- 85–95 percent survivorship at 10–15 years for contained defects in experienced centres
- Successful impaction grafting restores bone stock for future revisions — the primary long-term advantage
Evidence and landmark studies
- Slooff 1996: original Nijmegen description; 92 percent survivorship at 5 years
- Schreurs 2004: 85 percent survivorship at 10 years; fracture and subsidence as predictors of failure
- Halliday 2003 (Exeter): deliberate subsidence of the polished stem is part of the fixation philosophy
- van der Donk 2009: pooled data 87 percent survivorship; better outcomes with contained defects
Background & Evidence
Principle and rationale. Fresh-frozen morcellised allograft impacted densely around a polished tapered cemented stem restores proximal femoral bone stock by creeping substitution — the graft is progressively revascularised and remodelled by host osteoclasts and osteoblasts until it is replaced by living bone, while maintaining structural support to the stem during incorporation. The polished stem is deliberately non-bonded to the cement and subsides within the mantle to achieve a self-locking wedge; this is the opposite philosophy to a roughened or precoated stem that depends on immediate cement interlock. The Exeter and Nijmegen (Slooff) groups pioneered the technique, reporting greater than 85 percent survivorship at 10–15 years for contained defects. Why the defect must be contained. The medial calcar and the anterior and posterior metaphyseal cortices form the envelope that holds the graft under load. In revision surgery the calcar is often deficient or sclerotic, so mesh or strut augmentation is required to restore containment before any graft is introduced. The isthmus — the narrowest point of the diaphysis — provides the distal anchor for the trial during impaction; a minimum of 4 cm of intact isthmus is required for stable trial seating, and the anterior femoral bow must be respected when selecting stem length to avoid anterior cortical perforation. Paprosky femoral defect classification — the map that drives reconstruction choice.
- Defect and isthmus
- Minimal bone loss; intact metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone
- Implication for impaction grafting
- Primary stem or simple cementless revision suffices; impaction grafting not indicated
- Defect and isthmus
- Contained cavitary loss; intact proximal support; isthmus greater than 4 cm
- Implication for impaction grafting
- Classic indication for impaction bone grafting
- Defect and isthmus
- Greater than 4 cm of intact isthmus with contained loss
- Implication for impaction grafting
- Impaction grafting feasible; mesh-contain any segmental component
- Defect and isthmus
- Less than 4 cm of intact isthmus
- Implication for impaction grafting
- Trial stem cannot achieve rotational stability; modular fluted tapered stem or structural allograft preferred
- Defect and isthmus
- Complete loss of the proximal femur with no supportive isthmus
- Implication for impaction grafting
- Custom tumour prosthesis, allograft-prosthetic composite or proximal femoral replacement required; impaction grafting contraindicated
References
Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement
- Exeter series of 57 impaction grafting revisions with mean 10-year follow-up
- 88 percent survivorship free of aseptic loosening; mean subsidence 2.1 mm at 10 years
- Confirmed that deliberate subsidence of the polished stem within the cement mantle is part of the fixation philosophy and does not equate to failure
The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty
- Long cemented stems with impaction grafting provide reliable fixation in revision THA with severe proximal bone loss
- Low rate of subsidence and good incorporation when technique is meticulous
Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem: fifteen to twenty years follow-up
- 15–20 year follow-up of femoral impaction grafting with a polished cemented stem shows durable results
- Survivorship remains high with proper patient selection and technique; graft incorporation is maintained long-term
Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem
- Step-by-step technique description and outcomes of impaction grafting with a polished tapered stem
- Emphasises the importance of graft preparation, sequential impaction and protected weight-bearing