Iliosacral (Sacroiliac) Screw Fixation

TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Iliosacral (Sacroiliac) Screw Fixation

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries — sacral fractures and sacroiliac joint disruptions; fluoroscopic corridor anatomy, dysmorphic sacrum recognition, nerve-root and vascular danger zones, step-by-step percutaneous technique, trans-sacral screws, and post-operative rehabilitation

High-yield overview

Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries via S1/S2 osseous corridors | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
L5 Nerve Root — Anterior S1 Breach

Location: The L5 root exits the L5-S1 foramen and lies immediately anterior to the sacral ala in the region of the sacroiliac joint.

Risk: Any screw that breaches the anterior cortex of S1 will strike the L5 root before any other structure. This produces immediate ipsilateral foot-drop and numbness in the L5 dermatome. The root is most vulnerable on the true lateral view when the screw tip is advanced beyond the anterior sacral cortex.

Prevention: On the true lateral view confirm that the screw tip stops at or just short of the anterior cortex of the S1 body; never advance beyond this landmark.

S1 Nerve Root — Medial or Inferior Breach

Location: The S1 root travels within the S1 foramen and exits anteriorly through the first sacral foramen.

Risk: A screw that is placed too medially or too inferiorly will enter the S1 foramen and compress or transect the S1 root. This produces ipsilateral plantar-flexion weakness, loss of ankle jerk and perineal numbness if bilateral.

Prevention: On the outlet view the screw must remain lateral to the S1 foramen; on the inlet view it must remain posterior to the anterior sacral cortex.

Dysmorphic Sacrum — Narrowed S1 Corridor

Location: The upper sacral segment is dysmorphic in approximately 30 percent of patients; the anterior ala lies posterior to the sacral promontory and the superior endplate is steeply inclined.

Risk: Attempting a standard S1 screw in a dysmorphic sacrum places the screw either into the L5-S1 disc or directly into the L5 nerve root. The safe corridor may be less than 10 mm wide.

Prevention: Always obtain a true lateral view first. If the anterior cortex of the ala lies posterior to the promontory, abandon the S1 corridor and use S2 or a trans-sacral construct instead.

Cauda Equina — Midline Breach

Location: The thecal sac and cauda equina lie within the sacral canal immediately medial to the S1 and S2 bodies.

Risk: A screw that crosses the midline or is placed too medially will breach the sacral canal and cause cauda equina syndrome with bilateral leg weakness, saddle anaesthesia and bowel/bladder dysfunction.

Prevention: On the inlet view the screw trajectory must remain lateral to the midline sacral canal; bilateral screws must be planned so that their paths do not converge into the canal.

Iliac Vessels — Anterior Cortical Penetration

Location: The common iliac vessels and their branches lie immediately anterior to the sacroiliac joint and the sacral ala.

Risk: A screw that penetrates the anterior cortex of the ilium or sacrum can lacerate the iliac vein or artery, producing life-threatening retroperitoneal haemorrhage.

Prevention: On the true lateral view the screw tip must never advance beyond the anterior cortex of the sacral body; any further advancement risks immediate vascular injury.

Iliac Cortex Penetration Without Washer

Location: The outer table of the ilium is thin (2-4 mm) at the screw entry point.

Risk: Without a washer the screw head can sink through the thin iliac cortex under load, losing fixation and allowing late displacement of the posterior ring.

Prevention: Every iliosacral screw must be inserted with a large washer (minimum 10-12 mm diameter) to distribute load over a wider surface area on the outer ilium.

Mnemonic

C.O.R.R.I.D.O.RCORRIDOR — S1 and S2 Osseous Corridors

Mnemonic

D.A.N.G.E.RDANGER — Nerve-Root and Vascular Risk Zones

Mnemonic

R.E.D.U.C.EREDUCE — Reduction and Fixation Principles

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Vertically unstable posterior pelvic ring injury (Tile C, Young-Burgess APC III or LC III) with greater than 1 cm displacement of the hemipelvis
  • Sacroiliac joint dislocation with greater than 1 cm displacement after closed reduction
  • Unstable sacral fracture (Denis zone I or II) with greater than 1 cm displacement or comminution that precludes non-operative management
  • Bilateral posterior-ring instability or sacral insufficiency fracture with spinopelvic dissociation

Relative Indications

  • Rotationally unstable posterior-ring injury (Tile B, APC II, LC II) in a polytraumatised patient when early mobilisation is required
  • Sacral fracture or SI joint injury with associated neurological deficit that may benefit from decompression and stabilisation
  • Elderly patient with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fracture causing intractable pain and inability to mobilise

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection at the planned screw entry site or within the pelvis
  • Inadequate fluoroscopic visualisation (obesity, bowel gas, spinal hardware) without access to navigation or CT guidance
  • Patient unable to tolerate prone or lateral positioning due to associated injuries

Relative:

  • Dysmorphic sacrum with inadequate S1 or S2 corridor (less than 10 mm width) — consider trans-sacral or alternative fixation
  • Severe comminution of the sacral body that precludes reliable screw purchase
  • Open pelvic fracture with contaminated wound at the planned percutaneous entry site

Evidence for Percutaneous Iliosacral Fixation

Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes

  • Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation provides immediate biomechanical stability equivalent to open posterior approaches when the screw is placed accurately within the osseous corridor
  • Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation reduces surgical time, blood loss and wound complications compared with open posterior approaches in the acute trauma setting
  • Navigation-assisted or 3D-fluoroscopy-guided placement improves screw accuracy and reduces radiation exposure to the surgeon compared with conventional 2D fluoroscopy alone

Trans-sacral versus Unilateral Iliosacral Screws

  • Trans-sacral screws crossing the midline into the contralateral ilium provide superior torsional and axial stability for bilateral posterior-ring injuries and sacral insufficiency fractures
  • A single trans-sacral S1 screw combined with a unilateral S2 screw offers equivalent stability to two unilateral iliosacral screws in biomechanical models
  • Clinical series report lower rates of screw loosening and loss of reduction when trans-sacral constructs are used in osteoporotic or bilateral injuries

Supplementary Anterior Fixation

  • Rotationally unstable injuries (APC II-III) require anterior-ring stabilisation in addition to posterior screws; isolated posterior fixation allows late rotational displacement
  • Symphysis pubis plating or external fixation combined with accurate iliosacral screws restores pelvic-ring stability and permits earlier mobilisation than posterior screws alone

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 42-year-old polytrauma patient sustains an APC III pelvic-ring injury with a left sacroiliac joint dislocation and pubic symphysis diastasis greater than 3 cm. The posterior ring is displaced 1.5 cm superiorly. Outline your operative plan for stabilisation.

Practical approach
This is a rotationally and vertically unstable (Tile C, APC III) pelvic-ring injury that requires both anterior and posterior stabilisation. My plan is closed reduction of the posterior ring, percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of the left SI joint, and open reduction and internal fixation of the symphysis pubis. **Pre-operative planning**: I would review the CT to confirm the SI joint dislocation, assess for sacral dysmorphism on the true lateral reconstruction, and plan the S1 corridor. I would ensure the patient is physiologically stable for prone positioning and that a radiolucent table and large C-arm are available. **Reduction and posterior fixation**: Under general anaesthesia I would perform closed reduction of the hemipelvis using traction and percutaneous Schanz-pin manipulation. I would confirm anatomic reduction on the three critical fluoroscopic views (true lateral, inlet, outlet). A single 7.3 mm iliosacral screw with washer would be placed percutaneously into the S1 corridor under fluoroscopic guidance. I would confirm the screw tip lies at the anterior cortex of S1 without breach on the true lateral view and remains lateral to the midline on the inlet view. **Anterior fixation**: I would then turn the patient supine and perform open reduction and plating of the symphysis pubis with a 3.5 mm reconstruction plate and six cortical screws. This restores the anterior tension band and prevents late rotational displacement. **Post-operative care**: Touchdown weight-bearing for 8 weeks, then progressive weight-bearing. I would obtain post-operative CT to confirm screw position and reduction quality.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are planning percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for a vertically unstable sacral fracture. On the true lateral fluoroscopic view the anterior cortex of the sacral ala lies posterior to the sacral promontory. What is your interpretation and how does this change your operative plan?

Practical approach
This radiographic finding indicates a dysmorphic upper sacrum. The safe S1 osseous corridor is narrowed or absent and a standard iliosacral screw placed in the usual trajectory will either enter the L5-S1 disc or injure the L5 nerve root. **Interpretation**: In a dysmorphic sacrum the anterior cortex of the ala lies posterior to the promontory on the true lateral view. The superior S1 endplate is steeply inclined (greater than 30 degrees) and the S1 foramen appears anterior to the promontory on the inlet view. The safe corridor width may be less than 10 mm. **Change in operative plan**: I would abandon the S1 corridor. Instead I would plan an S2 screw or, more commonly in vertically unstable injuries, a trans-sacral construct. A trans-sacral S1 screw that crosses the midline into the contralateral ilium provides excellent stability for this pattern. I would use navigation or 3D fluoroscopy if available to confirm the trajectory. If percutaneous corridors remain inadequate I would convert to an open posterior approach with direct visualisation of the fracture and neural elements. **Rationale**: Attempting a standard S1 screw in a dysmorphic sacrum carries an unacceptably high risk of L5 nerve-root injury. Recognition on the true lateral view before any guide-wire insertion is mandatory.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 68-year-old woman with osteoporosis sustains a low-energy fall and presents with an H-shaped sacral insufficiency fracture and spinopelvic dissociation. She has severe low-back pain and is unable to mobilise. Describe your fixation strategy.

Practical approach
This is a fragility fracture of the sacrum with spinopelvic dissociation. The goal is immediate stabilisation to allow early mobilisation and prevent the complications of prolonged recumbency in an elderly patient. **Fixation strategy**: I would use a percutaneous trans-sacral construct. A single trans-sacral S1 screw crossing the midline into the contralateral ilium, combined with a unilateral S2 screw on the more displaced side, provides excellent biomechanical stability with minimal surgical morbidity. **Technique**: Under general anaesthesia I would position the patient prone and obtain perfect true lateral, inlet and outlet views. Because the sacrum is often dysmorphic in the elderly, I would pay particular attention to the true lateral view before guide-wire insertion. I would place a 7.3 mm trans-sacral S1 screw with washers on both iliac cortices. A second 7.3 mm S2 screw would be placed on the side of greater displacement. Both screws would be confirmed on all three fluoroscopic views. **Post-operative care**: Touchdown weight-bearing for 6 weeks, then progressive weight-bearing as tolerated. I would involve the osteoporosis team for bone-protection therapy and falls assessment. Early mobilisation with a walking frame reduces the risk of pneumonia, pressure sores and venous thromboembolism. **Rationale**: Trans-sacral screws are particularly effective in osteoporotic bone because they engage both iliac cortices and the sacral body, providing load-sharing fixation. The percutaneous technique minimises blood loss and wound complications in a frail patient.
Exam day cheat sheet
Iliosacral (Sacroiliac) Screw Fixation — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries

Level III
Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Agnew SG, Mann FAJ Trauma
Clinical implication: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a safe and effective technique for posterior pelvic ring stabilisation when performed with meticulous fluoroscopic technique.
Evidence

Iliosacral screw fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries: a biomechanical study

Level III
Yinger K, Scalise J, Olson SA, Bay BK, Finkemeier CGJ Orthop Trauma
Clinical implication: Bilateral or trans-sacral constructs should be considered for vertically unstable or bilateral posterior-ring injuries to maximise biomechanical stability.
Evidence

Dysmorphic upper sacrum and its effect on iliosacral screw placement

Level IV
Miller AN, Routt ML JrJ Orthop Trauma
Clinical implication: The true lateral fluoroscopic view must be obtained and interpreted before guide-wire insertion; dysmorphic anatomy requires abandonment of the S1 corridor in favour of S2 or trans-sacral fixation.
Evidence

Navigation-assisted iliosacral screw placement versus conventional fluoroscopy

Level III
Zwingmann J, Hauschild O, Bode G, Sudkamp NP, Schmal HInjury
Clinical implication: Navigation or 3D fluoroscopy should be used when available, particularly in obese patients or those with dysmorphic sacral anatomy.
Evidence

Trans-sacral screw fixation for sacral insufficiency fractures

Level IV
Mehling I, Hessmann MH, Rommens PMJ Orthop Trauma
Clinical implication: Trans-sacral screw fixation is an effective, minimally invasive option for fragility fractures of the sacrum and spinopelvic dissociation in the elderly.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.