Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer (Whole / Split)

Foot & AnkleAdvancedCore Procedure

Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer (Whole / Split)

Surgical technique guide for whole and split anterior tibial tendon transfer — SPLATT for relapsed idiopathic clubfoot after Ponseti correction and for dynamic supination in cerebral palsy and stroke, harvest of the TA insertion, rerouting and bony fixation under tension, concurrent tendo-Achilles lengthening

High-yield overview

Transfer of the tibialis anterior tendon to correct dynamic supination deformity | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Tibialis anterior tendon anatomy for transfer
Anatomy of the tibialis anterior tendon — transferred laterally (e.g. to the lateral cuneiform) to correct dynamic supination in relapsed clubfoot.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Deep Peroneal Nerve and Dorsalis Pedis Artery

Location: The deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery run between the EHL and the TA tendon at the ankle joint level, lying deep to the extensor retinaculum.

Risk: During the anterior approach to harvest the TA tendon and during creation of the subcutaneous tunnel from the anterior incision to the lateral foot, the nerve and artery can be stretched, contused or divided. Identify them between EHL and TA before passing the tendon transfer.

Protection: The subcutaneous tunnel must pass superficial to the extensor retinaculum, NOT deep to it. Palpate the nerve pedicle before passing the tendon passer.

Growth Plate Injury — Lateral Cuneiform / Cuboid

Location: The lateral cuneiform and cuboid ossification centres are present in the skeletally immature foot. A drill hole placed too close to the physis violates growth.

Risk: In children (typically aged 3-8 years for SPLATT in clubfoot), a bony tunnel drilled eccentrically near the physis can cause growth arrest, premature physiodesis, or progressive deformity.

Protection: Preoperative planning — use intraoperative fluoroscopy to assess physeal location. Drill the tunnel in the metaphyseal bone or use a metaphyseal suture anchor instead of a transphyseal tunnel.

Extensor Retinaculum Tether

Location: The superior and inferior extensor retinacula of the ankle overlie the anterior compartment tendons. Passing the transferred tendon DEEP to these retinacula restricts excursion.

Risk: A tendon passed deep to the retinaculum will tether — the transfer works against the retinaculum rather than with the excursion of the muscle. The result is limited dorsiflexion and a stiff, ineffectual transfer.

Protection: Pass the transferred tendon superficial to the extensor retinaculum in the subcutaneous plane. The entire rerouting from the anterior incision to the dorsolateral foot should be subcutaneous.

Over-Correction into Valgus — Adverse CTEV

Mechanism: The transferred TA, especially in a whole transfer or when tensioned with the foot in excessive eversion, pulls the foot into a valgus deformity — the opposite problem.

Recognition: Post-operatively the foot sits in a pronated/everted position at rest. On active dorsiflexion the foot adopts a valgus position. The patient (if ambulatory) walks on the medial border of the foot.

Prevention: Tension with the foot in no more than 5 degrees of eversion. Prefer the split transfer (SPLATT) over whole transfer in ambulatory patients. If the peroneals are weak, even a split transfer can over-correct.

Equinus Deformity — Unrecognised Tight Tendo-Achilles

Why concurrent TAL is critical: Dynamic supination deformity frequently co-exists with equinus — especially in the relapsed clubfoot and in cerebral palsy. The TA is recruited as a secondary ankle dorsiflexor; after transfer, the equinus contribution of the TA is removed, unmasking a fixed equinus contracture.

The trap: Performing an isolated TA transfer without examining for a Silfverskiöld-positive equinus contracture. If the ankle cannot dorsiflex to neutral with the knee extended, a TAL (or gastrocnemius recession if the contracture is isolated to gastrocnemius) must be performed concurrently to achieve a plantigrade foot.

Test: Silfverskiöld test — dorsiflex the ankle with the knee extended and then flexed. Limited dorsiflexion in both positions = Achilles contracture (need TAL). Limited only with knee extension = gastrocnemius contracture (gastrocnemius recession may suffice).

Peroneal Weakness — Hidden Root of Supination

Pathophysiology: Dynamic supination is a relative imbalance between the tibialis anterior (inverter/everter in dorsiflexion) and the peroneals (evertors). Weakness of the peroneus brevis and/or longus — from nerve injury, myelomeningocoele, or cerebral palsy — unmasks the TA's supination moment.

The exam trap: A patient with what appears to be a pure dynamic supination deformity may have underlying peroneal weakness. If the peroneals are not functioning, even an anatomically perfect SPLATT may produce a stiff transfer that does not restore balanced active eversion.

Prevention: Manual muscle test the peroneals (F-s: foot eversion against resistance) before surgery. If peroneal strength is Medical Research Council grade less than 3, consider a concurrent tendon augmentation or the addition of a posterior tibial tendon transfer.

Mnemonic

T.A.T.TTATT — Key Principles of Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer

Mnemonic

S.P.L.A.T.TSPLATT — Patient Selection and Prerequisites

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Dynamic forefoot supination deformity in a relapsed idiopathic clubfoot after Ponseti correction — forefoot-driven supination during the swing phase of gait that does not respond to repeat casting or bracing
  • Spastic dynamic supination deformity of the foot in cerebral palsy (hemiplegia or diplegia) with a supple, passively correctable foot
  • Stroke-related dynamic supination with functional impairment during gait — forefoot supination in swing phase causing foot-drop and tripping
  • Failed non-operative management — bracing, AFO adjustment, botulinum toxin injection to the tibialis anterior have failed to control the deformity

Relative Indications

  • Mild-to-moderate dynamic supination in the ambulatory CP patient with a Silfverskiöld-negative ankle (no equinus)
  • Whole transfer for severe recurrent deformity after failed SPLATT
  • Dynamic supination in myelomeningocoele (lower lumbar level) with supple foot deformity
  • Combined procedure with calcaneal osteotomy for the rigid cavovarus foot after the osteotomy has corrected the fixed component

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Fixed bony deformity — a rigid hindfoot varus, fixed cavus, or fixed equinus that does not correct with passive manipulation. An isolated tendon transfer in this setting will fail. Address the bony deformity with an osteotomy (Dwyer calcaneal osteotomy, lateral column lengthening, first metatarsal dorsiflexion osteotomy) first
  • Active infection in the surgical field
  • Non-functioning peroneal musculature (MRC grade less than 3) without a plan for tendon augmentation or alternative reconstruction — the transfer will produce a stiff foot without active eversion

Relative:

  • Severe spasticity not controlled by botulinum toxin or baclofen — consider selective dorsal rhizotomy or intrathecal baclofen before isolated foot surgery
  • Non-ambulatory patient without functional goals that the transfer can address — weigh carefully against the simplicity of AFO management
  • Younger than 2 years — the TA tendon is small, the lateral cuneiform ossific nucleus is small, and the physis is at risk
  • Previous surgery in the anterior compartment — scarred planes, altered neurovascular anatomy

Evidence for Tendon Transfer

SPLATT for Relapsed Clubfoot

  • The procedure is the standard of care for dynamic forefoot supination in the Ponseti-treated clubfoot that relapses after initial correction. The incidence of dynamic supination after Ponseti casting ranges from 10% to 30% of treated feet, and SPLATT is indicated when repeat casting and bracing fail
  • The transfer converts the TA from a supinator into a dorsiflexor-evertor, rebalancing the foot in swing phase
  • Mubarak and Van Valin (2009, J Pediatr Orthop): a case series of 32 feet treated with SPLATT for relapsed clubfoot after Ponseti treatment showed complete correction in 91% of feet at mean follow-up of 3.5 years, with no recurrence of supination
  • Thompson et al. (2009, J Pediatr Orthop): retrospective review of SPLATT in 23 children with relapsed clubfoot after Ponseti management — 96% satisfactory outcome at mean 5-year follow-up

SPLATT for Cerebral Palsy

  • Hoffer et al. (1974): the original description of the split TA transfer — 26 patients with spastic hemiplegia demonstrated durable correction of varus/supination deformity during gait
  • Barnes and Herring (1991, J Bone Joint Surg Am): 28 patients with CP who underwent combined SPLATT and intramuscular lengthening of the posterior tibial tendon — 82% good-to-excellent results; concurrent TAL performed in 54% of cases
  • The procedure is most effective in ambulatory children with hemiplegic CP who have a dynamic (not fixed) deformity; the presence of an equinus contracture requiring simultaneous TAL is the rule rather than the exception

Indications and Outcomes — Whole vs Split TA Transfer


Key Evidence

Evidence

The split anterior tibial tendon transfer in the treatment of spastic varus hindfoot of childhood

Level IV
Hoffer MM, Reiswig JA, Garrett AM, Perry JOrthop Clin North Am
Clinical implication: This seminal description established the SPLATT as the definitive procedure for dynamic supination deformity in cerebral palsy and remains the most widely used tendon transfer for this indication.
Source: Orthop Clin North Am. 1974 Jan;5(1):31-8
Evidence

Combined split anterior tibial-tendon transfer and intramuscular lengthening of the posterior tibial tendon in spastic cerebral palsy

Level IV
Barnes MJ, Herring JAJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: SPLATT cannot be considered in isolation — the equinus component must be addressed concurrently. This paper established the combined procedure as the standard for the spastic supination deformity.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jun;73(5):734-8
Evidence

Normalization of Forefoot Supination After Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for Dynamic Clubfoot Recurrence

Level III
Mindler GT, Kranzl A, Radler CJ Pediatr Orthop
Clinical implication: Instrumented gait analysis confirms that TATT normalises forefoot supination in dynamic clubfoot recurrence after Ponseti treatment, approaching the kinematics of age-matched healthy children.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Sep;40(8):418-424
Evidence

How do different anterior tibial tendon transfer techniques influence forefoot and hindfoot motion?

Level IV
Knutsen AR, Avoian T, Sangiorgio SN, Borkowski SL, Ebramzadeh EClin Orthop Relat Res
Clinical implication: Biomechanical evidence supporting SPLATT over whole or medial transfer — the split technique provides the most balanced correction of forefoot supination without over-correcting the hindfoot.
Source: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1737-43
Evidence

The split anterior tibialis tendon transfer procedure for spastic equinovarus foot in children with cerebral palsy: results and factors associated with a failed outcome

Level IV
Limpaphayom N, Chantarasongsuk B, Osateerakun P, Prasongchin PInt Orthop
Clinical implication: SPLATT for CP has a high success rate (84%) when patient selection criteria are met — dynamic deformity, good selective motor control, and ambulatory status. Fixed deformity or poor motor control predicts failure.
Source: Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1593-8

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 4-year-old boy with a history of Ponseti-corrected idiopathic clubfoot presents with dynamic supination of the forefoot during the swing phase of gait. The foot is plantigrade at rest and can be passively corrected into valgus. His ankle dorsiflexes to neutral with the knee flexed but to 5 degrees of plantarflexion with the knee extended. How do you manage this child?

Practical approach
This is a classic presentation of relapsed clubfoot with dynamic supination — the foot is passively correctable but the TA produces supination during the swing phase of gait. The Silfverskiöld test is positive for a gastrocnemius-soleus contracture (more equinus with the knee extended than flexed). My management plan is as follows: **Pre-operative assessment**: I would confirm that the foot is fully supple and that there is no fixed hindfoot varus or fixed equinus — a Coleman block test to rule out forefoot-driven hindfoot varus. I would assess the peroneal strength (MRC grade 4 or greater — adequate for SPLATT). I would obtain standing foot radiographs to document bony alignment and exclude tarsal coalition or other structural deformity. **Surgical plan**: SPLATT (split anterior tibial tendon transfer to the lateral cuneiform) combined with a gastrocnemius recession (Strayer procedure) or a percutaneous TAL depending on the degree of equinus contracture. I would perform the TAL first to define the plantigrade position, then perform the SPLATT. The transfer would be tensioned with the foot in neutral dorsiflexion and 5 degrees of eversion. I would fix the transferred tendon into a 4.0 mm transosseous tunnel in the lateral cuneiform with a pull-out suture over a plantar button. **Post-operative care**: Below-knee cast in the equinus position for 3 weeks (to protect the TAL), then serial cast change to neutral at 4-5 weeks. The plantar button and pull-out suture are removed at the first or second cast change. Total cast immobilisation: 6 weeks. After cast removal, the child transitions to a walking boot for 2 weeks, then to normal footwear. Follow-up at 6 months, 1 year, and annually until skeletal maturity for gait assessment and monitoring for recurrence. **Why not whole transfer?**: The split transfer preserves the medial half of the TA, maintaining active dorsiflexion — important in an ambulatory child who needs balanced ankle motion. A whole transfer would provide more eversion moment but at the cost of losing the active inversion function and increasing the risk of over-correction.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 12-year-old boy with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (GMFCS II, independent community ambulator) presents with a dynamic supination deformity of his right foot. The foot is supple and correctable. There is also an equinus contracture of 10 degrees that is positive on Silfverskiöld testing (gastrocnemius contracture). The peroneals are graded MRC 4. The parents report that he trips frequently when walking outdoors. He has not had any previous surgery. Describe your management.

Practical approach
This is a classic presentation of the spastic supination deformity in CP hemiplegia/diplegia. The patient is a good candidate for SPLATT because: (1) the deformity is dynamic and fully correctable, (2) he is ambulatory with functional goals, (3) the peroneals are intact. The equinus contracture must be addressed concurrently. **Pre-operative workup**: I would obtain standing foot radiographs and consider instrumented gait analysis to confirm the swing-phase supination pattern and to assess for concurrent hip/knee pathology (common in CP diplegia). I would examine: (1) GMFCS level, (2) Ashworth grade for spasticity in the ankle plantarflexors and invertors, (3) Selective Motor Control (SMC) score for the TA (the child should be able to activate the TA independently), (4) presence of a hip adduction deformity or hamstring tightness that alters gait. **Surgical plan**: I would perform a Strayer gastrocnemius recession (or a percutaneous TAL if the Soleus is also contracted — the Silfverskiöld test showed gastrocnemius-only tightness so a Strayer is preferred) combined with SPLATT to the lateral cuneiform. I would use a pull-out suture over a plantar button for fixation. The tensioning principle is the same: neutral dorsiflexion, slight eversion. **The parents' question about tripping**: I would explain that the SPLATT converts the deforming force from a supinator into a dorsiflexor-evertor, allowing the foot to clear the ground in swing phase without supination. The TAL allows the foot to achieve a plantigrade position in stance. I would set expectations: the GMFCS level does not change after this surgery — the child will still have CP — but gait efficiency and safety improve, tripping frequency decreases, and shoe wear becomes more normal. **Post-operative plan**: Below-knee cast in equinus for 3-4 weeks then transition to a neutral cast. Total 6 weeks of casting. Then a walking boot for 2-3 weeks, followed by physiotherapy focused on gait retraining and active eversion-dorsiflexion. I would recommend annual follow-up through skeletal maturity to monitor for growth-related recurrence. **Late effect of the transfer**: The transferred TA continues to function in dorsiflexion — the child will be able to actively dorsiflex the ankle with a slight eversion component (the desired outcome). The preserved medial slip of the TA retains some inversion function, preventing a rigid valgus posture.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

You have just performed a SPLATT with a pull-out suture over a plantar button for a 6-year-old girl with relapsed clubfoot. The foot was positioned in neutral dorsiflexion and 5 degrees of eversion when the button was tied. At the first cast change (4 weeks), the foot is in 10 degrees of valgus. The button is intact and the wound is clean. What has gone wrong and how do you manage it?

Practical approach
The foot is 10 degrees into valgus — an over-correction complication. The most likely cause is that the TA transfer was tensioned with the foot in excessive eversion at the time of fixation, or the plantar button was tied with the foot not in the intended position (e.g. the assistant was holding the foot in too much eversion). In a split transfer, this degree of valgus is less common than in a whole transfer, but it can occur. **Assessment at 4 weeks**: I would examine the foot carefully — confirm that the valgus is passively correctable (i.e. it is a positional deformity from the tension of the transfer, not a fixed bony deformity). I would remove the plantar button and pull-out suture at this visit (as planned — the tendon is healed within the bone tunnel by 4 weeks). I would then apply a new cast with the foot in neutral (not valgus) — the goal is to hold the foot in neutral position and allow the tension to settle. I would keep the cast in neutral for the remaining 2 weeks of the 6-week protocol. **If the valgus persists at 6 weeks**: After cast removal, I would fit the child with an AFO set in neutral position (not in valgus) to support the foot during gait. I would initiate physiotherapy with a focus on active inversion and plantarflexion (to strengthen the opposing muscles) and gentle passive correction of the valgus. The valgus may improve spontaneously over the next 6-12 months as the child grows and the relative contribution of the transferred tendon decreases. **If the valgus persists beyond 12 months**: If the valgus is still 10 degrees or more and symptomatic (the child walks on the medial border of the foot, has pain, difficulty with shoe fit), revision surgery may be considered. Options: (1) release of the transferred tendon — a simple tenotomy of the transferred lateral half (the medial half is intact and can still dorsiflex the foot), (2) revision of the transfer with the foot in correct alignment, (3) a medialising calcaneal osteotomy to correct the fixed valgus if adaptive bony deformity has developed. **Why I would not do the wrong thing**: I would not re-tension the transfer at 4 weeks — removing the button and re-tensioning risks pulling the tendon out of the tunnel or damaging the healed insertion. I would not do nothing — a foot left in 10 degrees of valgus will adapt with growth and produce a fixed deformity. A cast in neutral with an AFO is the most appropriate first step.
Exam day cheat sheet
Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer (Whole / Split) — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

The split anterior tibial tendon transfer in the treatment of spastic varus hindfoot of childhood

Level IV
Hoffer MM, Reiswig JA, Garrett AM, Perry JOrthop Clin North Am
Clinical implication: Landmark paper — established SPLATT as the standard procedure for dynamic supination deformity in cerebral palsy.
Source: Orthop Clin North Am. 1974 Jan;5(1):31-8
Evidence

Combined split anterior tibial-tendon transfer and intramuscular lengthening of the posterior tibial tendon in spastic cerebral palsy

Level IV
Barnes MJ, Herring JAJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: SPLATT should not be performed in isolation — the equinus and varus components from the PTT must be addressed concurrently for optimal outcomes.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jun;73(5):734-8
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.