Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis (Hindfoot Nail)

Operative SurgeryFoot & Ankle
Foot & AnkleAdvancedCore Procedure

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis (Hindfoot Nail)

Surgical technique guide for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis using a retrograde hindfoot intramedullary nail for combined tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis, failed total ankle replacement, Charcot hindfoot, avascular talus and severe hindfoot deformity

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Simultaneous fusion of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints using a retrograde intramedullary nail | advanced

foot-ankleSubspecialty
11 stepsOperative sequence
4Danger zones
120 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis fuses BOTH the tibiotalar (ankle) AND subtalar (talocalcaneal) joints through a single retrograde intramedullary nail inserted from the plantar heel. Because the nail crosses both joints it is distinct from isolated ankle or subtalar fusion, and is reserved as a salvage procedure for combined end-stage disease when isolated fusion is insufficient.
  • The plantar entry portal is the danger zone. The lateral plantar neurovascular bundle runs from the medial heel pad toward the lateral midfoot and lies just medial to the entry trajectory β€” place the incision slightly LATERAL to the heel-pad midline, identify the bundle medially, and retract it before reaming.
  • Joint preparation combines an anterior ankle arthrotomy (or a lateral transfibular approach) with a sinus tarsi approach to the subtalar joint: denude cartilage, fish-scale the subchondral plate to bleeding bone, and correct alignment to a plantigrade hindfoot (5 degrees of valgus, neutral forefoot, tibial axis through the central hindfoot) BEFORE nail insertion.
  • Union runs 70-90 percent in primary TTC fusion but falls to 50-70 percent in Charcot, avascular talus and failed total ankle replacement. Use a LONG nail (180-300 mm) to the tibial metaphysis β€” short nails ending in the diaphysis invite a stress fracture at the tip within 1-2 years.
  • Varus malunion is the worst-tolerated alignment error: the patient loads the lateral border, develops fifth-metatarsal overload and may ulcerate. Small degrees of residual valgus are well tolerated; varus is not.

When & Why


The operation in one line. A retrograde intramedullary nail is driven from the plantar calcaneus across the subtalar and ankle joints into the tibial metaphysis, simultaneously arthrodesing both joints and bypassing global hindfoot pathology. It is a salvage procedure β€” the patient trades all ankle and hindfoot motion for a stable, pain-free, plantigrade foot. Primary indications. Reserve TTC arthrodesis for disease that isolated ankle or subtalar fusion cannot address:

  • Combined tibiotalar AND subtalar arthritis β€” the most common indication; isolated fusion will not relieve the patient's pain.
  • Failed total ankle replacement (TAR) with subtalar arthritis, talar component subsidence or aseptic loosening where revision TAR is not feasible.
  • Charcot neuroarthropathy (Eichenholtz stage 2-3) of the hindfoot with instability, deformity or ulceration β€” a load-sharing construct that bypasses both joints.
  • Avascular necrosis of the talus with collapse β€” either preserve the talus with structural graft bridging to the calcaneus, or perform talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis.
  • Severe hindfoot deformity (post-traumatic varus, equinocavovarus, equinus contracture) requiring correction across both joints.
  • Failed prior ankle or subtalar arthrodesis with nonunion, malunion or symptomatic adjacent joint disease.
  • Tumour resection of the talus requiring intercalary reconstruction. Relative indications include salvage of a failed TAR in a lower-demand patient (where conversion to a TTC nail is definitive), a talar body fracture too comminuted for ORIF, and severe post-traumatic hindfoot bone loss needing a bridging graft. Contraindications.
  • Absolute: active infection (osteomyelitis of the tibia, talus or calcaneus) β€” clear it first with staged debridement; uncorrectable vascular insufficiency β€” check the ankle-brachial pressure index and revascularise first; severe peripheral neuropathy with open ulceration through the planned incision β€” heal the wound first.
  • Relative: a young, high-demand patient β€” consider staged ankle and subtalar fusion to preserve whatever hindfoot motion is possible; active Charcot with severe fragmentation (Brodsky 3B) β€” consider external fixation or staged management; a smoker (nonunion risk up to 2-3 times higher β€” counsel and use graft adjuncts); severe osteoporosis (T-score less than minus 3) β€” consider a plate-augmented construct or external fixation. The one decision: TTC versus isolated or staged fusion.
  • Fuse both joints when there is documented arthritis of both, a failed isolated fusion with symptomatic adjacent joint disease, a Charcot hindfoot, severe deformity across both joints, or AVN of the talus.
  • Consider isolated or staged fusion when only one joint is diseased (isolated tibiotalar arthritis with a normal subtalar joint β†’ ankle arthrodesis alone; isolated subtalar arthritis β†’ subtalar arthrodesis alone), or in a young high-demand patient with combined disease where staged fusions preserve some hindfoot motion. In a young patient with a TAR and subtalar arthritis, TAR plus an isolated subtalar fusion retains ankle sagittal motion. Functional trade-off. TTC fusion sacrifices ALL ankle and subtalar motion for a stiff but functional gait. Staged ankle-plus-subtalar fusion ultimately loses both motions too β€” the practical difference is the order of surgery, not the final motion. A young patient undergoing TTC fusion is committed to a stiff hindfoot for life, so counsel carefully. Special-case decisions.
  • Avascular talus: options are core decompression (early AVN without collapse), TTC arthrodesis with structural graft (talus preserved as a scaffold), talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis (higher union, lower hindfoot height), and total talar replacement (emerging, limited long-term data).
  • Failed TAR: when revision arthroplasty is not feasible (bone loss, infection, severe deformity), TTC nailing is the gold-standard salvage β€” there is no further revision option afterwards.
  • Charcot: stage by Eichenholtz. Stage 1 (development) is managed conservatively in a total contact cast; stage 2 (coalescence) and stage 3 (reconstruction with residual deformity) are when TTC nailing is considered. Pre-operative work-up. Examine the foot in stance and gait β€” identify the deformity apex, skin status, ulceration and the soft-tissue envelope, and check the contralateral foot for reference alignment. Assess the Achilles with the Silfverskiold test (knee flexed and extended) to decide between gastrocnemius recession and formal Achilles lengthening. Document neurovascular status (posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis pulses, capillary refill, sensation). Image with weight-bearing AP, mortise and lateral ankle radiographs, a Saltzman hindfoot alignment view, CT for joint destruction and bone loss, and MRI (sagittal STIR/T1) for suspected AVN or Charcot. In diabetics, optimise hard before surgery: HbA1c less than 7.5 percent, fasting glucose controlled, albumin greater than 30 g/L, lymphocytes greater than 1500, and screen for Charcot with bilateral weight-bearing radiographs. If infection is suspected, check inflammatory markers, review the wound and aspirate. Consent. Quote specific risks: nonunion (10-30 percent overall, up to 40-50 percent in AVN and Charcot), malunion, infection (5-10 percent), nerve injury, plantar wound problems, stress fracture at the nail tip (3-8 percent), DVT/PE, complex regional pain syndrome, and the need for revision. Set realistic expectations: pain relief and a plantigrade foot, but loss of ALL ankle and hindfoot motion (inversion/eversion and dorsiflexion/plantarflexion) β€” the gait will be stiff but functional.

The Operation


The goal is a stable, pain-free, plantigrade hindfoot. The exposure is the heart of the operation: prepare both joints through an anterior (or lateral transfibular) approach and a sinus tarsi approach, then establish the plantar entry portal while protecting the lateral plantar neurovascular bundle, correct alignment, and lock a long nail across both joints.

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde nail
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde hindfoot nail fusing the ankle and subtalar joints β€” for combined tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis or failed ankle reconstruction.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Positioning, preparation & anaesthesia
  • Supine on a radiolucent table with a bump under the ipsilateral hip to bring the foot into neutral rotation; thigh tourniquet inflated after exsanguination; leg prepped and draped free from the knee distally.
  • A foot-rest or towel stack under the calf lifts the heel off the table and improves access to the plantar entry portal.
  • Image intensifier on the contralateral side β€” confirm AP and lateral views of the tibia, ankle and calcaneus are obtainable and the C-arm swings freely before draping.
  • General or regional anaesthesia; pre-operative antibiotics (e.g. cefazolin 2 g IV) within 60 minutes of incision; tranexamic acid per local protocol.
  • Prepare the iliac crest or proximal tibia if structural graft is anticipated β€” otherwise tibial reamings will provide sufficient cancellous autograft.
Step 2Achilles lengthening (if equinus)
  • Perform this FIRST. A percutaneous triple hemisection or a formal open Z-lengthening; aim for 5-10 degrees of dorsiflexion with the foot plantigrade.
  • If the Silfverskiold test shows gastrocnemius-only contracture (dorsiflexion improves with knee flexion), a Strayer recession suffices and avoids the calcaneal gait of an over-lengthened Achilles.
  • Danger of over-lengthening: calcaneal gait, push-off weakness, plantar heel ulceration. Danger of under-lengthening: residual equinus, rocker-bottom deformity, lateral forefoot overload. Confirm dorsiflexion with the knee in both extension and flexion.
Step 3Exposure β€” ankle joint (anterior or lateral transfibular)
  • Anterior approach (most common): a longitudinal incision over the ankle just lateral to the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon. The deep peroneal nerve and anterior tibial artery lie between EHL and extensor digitorum longus β€” identify and protect them. Open the extensor retinaculum, retract the tendons, and capsulotomise to expose the tibiotalar joint. The mortise-shaped tibiotalar articulation (distal tibial plafond and malleoli around the talar dome) moves primarily in the sagittal plane; the anterior capsule is thin and accessible, the posterior capsule thicker.
  • Remove anterior osteophytes and cartilage with osteotomes, curettes and a burr; use a lamina spreader to reach the posterior cartilage. Fish-scale the subchondral plate to bleeding bone β€” sclerotic bone will not unite, and burr heat necrosis without irrigation causes bone death and nonunion.
  • Lateral transfibular approach (Charcot, revision, severe deformity, or when anterior access is contraindicated): an oblique incision over the distal fibula continuing distally toward the sinus tarsi. Osteotomise the fibula 6-8 cm proximal to its tip and reflect it distally with the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments intact (or detach and reattach through bone tunnels later). It gives a single broad view of both joints and the deformity, and the fibrectomy decompresses the lateral soft tissues β€” at the cost of the sural nerve and peroneal tendons in the field.
Step 4Exposure β€” subtalar joint (sinus tarsi)
  • A 3-4 cm incision over the sinus tarsi from the tip of the lateral malleolus toward the fourth metatarsal base. The sinus tarsi is the soft-tissue corridor between the talar neck and the posterior facet of the calcaneus β€” the key lateral route to the subtalar joint, whose posterior facet is the principal weight-bearing surface and whose oblique axis (posteromedial to anterolateral) governs inversion-eversion.
  • Excise the sinus tarsi fat pad, open the posterior facet capsule, and denude cartilage with curettes and a high-speed burr; clear the middle and anterior facets through the same incision or a separate medial approach. Fish-scale both sides to punctate bleeding bone; pack any large cyst with cancellous graft from the tibial reamings.
  • Dangers: the sural nerve (lateral border of the foot) and the peroneal tendons (peroneus longus beneath the cuboid, peroneus brevis at the fifth metatarsal base) posterior to the lateral malleolus; the flexor hallucis longus medially (it runs in a fibro-osseous tunnel along the posteromedial talus and beneath the sustentaculum tali, passing between the medial and lateral tubercles of the posterior talar process).
Step 5Plantar entry portal β€” the critical step
  • Palpate the weight-bearing heel pad and make a 3-4 cm transverse or short oblique incision slightly LATERAL to the midline of the heel pad, centred over the calcaneal tuberosity.
  • Dissect bluntly through subcutaneous fat. Identify the lateral plantar neurovascular bundle β€” it arises from the posterior tibial bundle beneath the flexor retinaculum and courses from the medial heel pad distally and laterally, deep to abductor hallucis and superficial to flexor digitorum brevis, toward the base of the fifth metatarsal. It lies MEDIAL to a correctly placed lateral entry β€” identify it, place a Senn or right-angle retractor medially to keep it out of the field, and never let it be the lateral-most structure in the wound.
  • Incise the plantar fascia in line with its fibres, split flexor digitorum brevis in line with the incision, and identify the calcaneal tuberosity and posterior facet.
  • Place the guide wire at the junction of the posterior and middle calcaneal facets, in line with the tibial canal. On AP it should lie in the centre of the tibial plafond; on lateral, in line with the tibial shaft axis, slightly posterior to the centre of the talar body. Do NOT start reaming until both views are perfect.
  • Neighbouring anatomy to respect: the medial plantar nerve runs along the medial border of the plantar fascia toward the great toe (spared by a lateralised entry, at risk with extensive medial dissection); the posterior tibial bundle lies in the tarsal tunnel behind the medial malleolus; the sural nerve runs along the lateral foot; the saphenous nerve and vein run anteromedially.
Step 6Reaming & nail selection
  • Ream sequentially over the guide wire from 8 mm, increasing in 0.5-1 mm increments, to 1 mm greater than the chosen nail diameter; collect cancellous autograft in the bone-sieve. Confirm trajectory on AP and lateral at each step.
  • Select a nail length so the proximal tip rests in the tibial metaphysis β€” long nails of 180-300 mm reduce the risk of a stress fracture at the tip. Diameter is typically 10-13 mm, matched to the reamed canal.
  • Dangers: reaming beyond the anterior tibial cortex (anterior cortical perforation); eccentric reaming (varus/valgus malalignment); inadequate reaming (nail incarceration or fracture); heat necrosis without irrigation.
Step 7Correction of alignment (before the nail)
  • Before nail insertion, correct the hindfoot to a plantigrade position: 5 degrees of hindfoot valgus, neutral forefoot, tibial axis through the central hindfoot, 0-5 degrees of tibial torsion.
  • Address residual equinus (the Achilles has already been lengthened); translate the calcaneus medially or laterally relative to the tibia as needed; hold the position with the guide wire and provisional K-wires during reaming.
  • Check rotation by the position of the second metatarsal relative to the tibial crest. Confirm alignment on AP and lateral with the leg hanging free (no force) before final nail insertion.
  • Varus is the worst-tolerated error (lateral border overload, fifth-metatarsal pain and ulceration); over-correction into valgus greater than 10 degrees causes lateral ankle pain and shoe difficulty; residual equinus produces a rocker-bottom and forefoot overload.
Step 8Bone grafting (before the nail)
  • Pack cancellous autograft (tibial reamings or iliac crest) into the tibiotalar and subtalar joints BEFORE nail insertion β€” it is far harder to do afterwards.
  • For AVN, severe bone loss or Charcot, add a structural graft bridging the tibial plafond to the calcaneus: a tricortical iliac crest autograft (anterior crest preferred β€” less nerve injury than posterior) or a femoral-head allograft (no donor morbidity, slower incorporation). Consider a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) adjunct in Charcot, AVN or revision.
  • Distribute graft circumferentially around the nail after insertion. The graft is the biology; the nail is the stability β€” both are required.
Step 9Nail insertion
  • Insert the chosen nail over the guide wire under fluoroscopic control, watching depth and trajectory. Stop if there is resistance and re-check alignment β€” a nail that will not advance usually means a malalignment to correct, not more force.
  • On lateral, confirm the proximal tip sits in the tibial metaphysis; on AP, that the nail is centred in the canal. Remove the guide wire and confirm rotational alignment before locking.
Step 10Locking screws
  • Place proximal locking screws in the tibia through the targeting guide β€” typically two screws in different planes.
  • Place distal locking screws in the calcaneus and talus. Use at least two calcaneal screws in different planes for rotational control (a single screw cannot provide it); add a talar screw if bone quality permits.
  • Confirm all screw lengths on fluoroscopy β€” bicortical purchase in the calcaneus, and avoid a tip protruding into the plantar or medial soft tissues. In osteoporotic bone, consider longer screws or PMMA cement augmentation.
  • Dangers: a screw breaching the subtalar or Chopart joint (measure carefully); a tip irritating a nerve or causing screw-head pain; loss of rotational control.
Step 11Wound closure & dressing
  • Irrigate all wounds copiously. Close the anterior or lateral approach in layers β€” joint capsule, extensor retinaculum (if divided), subcutaneous tissue, skin; close the sinus tarsi incision in layers.
  • Close the plantar incision meticulously in layers β€” the deep intrinsic muscle layer, the plantar fascia, subcutaneous tissue, then skin with interrupted non-absorbable sutures (nylon or Prolene). The plantar skin is a weight-bearing surface and any dehiscence is catastrophic.
  • Apply a sterile non-adherent dressing and a well-padded posterior splint in neutral position. Do NOT apply a circumferential cast in theatre because of post-operative swelling.
  • Dangers: plantar dehiscence (deep infection, nail exposure, potential loss of the construct); haematoma; suture under tension (skin necrosis); compartment syndrome from tight closure or a circumferential cast.
Lateral plantar neurovascular bundle β€” the critical safety step

Before any reaming, identify the lateral plantar neurovascular bundle in the plantar wound. It courses from the medial heel pad toward the lateral midfoot, deep to abductor hallucis and superficial to flexor digitorum brevis, and lies just medial to a correctly sited entry trajectory. Place the incision slightly lateral to the heel-pad midline, stay lateral to the medial band of the plantar fascia, dissect bluntly, identify the bundle medially, retract it medially, and enter the calcaneus under direct vision. The bundle must never be the lateral-most structure in the wound. Injury (1-5 percent) presents as medial-sole/lateral-midfoot numbness or a painful plantar neuroma.

Anterior versus lateral transfibular β€” choose by pathology

Use the anterior approach for most primary cases: it is direct and reliable, and it preserves the fibula for any future revision. Reserve the lateral transfibular approach for Charcot and revision cases with severe deformity β€” it gives a single broad view of both joints and the deformity, and the fibrectomy decompresses the lateral soft tissues, at the cost of the sural nerve and peroneal tendons in the field.

Use a long nail β€” short nails stress-fracture the tibia

Select a long hindfoot nail of 180-300 mm so the proximal tip rests in the tibial metaphysis. A short nail ending in the tibial diaphysis concentrates stress at the tip and is a set-up for a transverse anterior tibial stress fracture 1-3 years post-operatively (an incidence of 3-8 percent). Ream to 1 mm greater than the nail diameter, sequentially, and collect the reamings for graft.

Alignment is everything β€” varus is the worst error

The single most important technical variable is a plantigrade foot. Check alignment with the leg hanging free and the foot plantigrade before finalising the nail: 5 degrees of hindfoot valgus, neutral forefoot, tibial axis through the central hindfoot. If the heel sits in varus, translate the calcaneus laterally or apply a medial closing-wedge correction at the ankle. Do not finalise the nail until the foot is plantigrade β€” small degrees of residual valgus are tolerated, varus is not.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation / weight-bearing | Milestones | |-------|--------|----------------------------------|------------| | Early | Day 0-14 | Posterior splint, well-padded; strict elevation 48-72 h; strict non-weight-bearing | Wound review at 48-72 h; multimodal analgesia; VTE prophylaxis | | Intermediate | Weeks 2-12 | Sutures out at 10-14 days; removable boot or short-leg cast once healed; progressive weight-bearing in a boot from 6-8 weeks in primary cases | Radiographs at 6 and 12 weeks for early bridging | | Consolidation | Weeks 12-24 | Boot weaning; custom-moulded foot orthosis | CT at 3-6 months if union is uncertain | | Return to function | 3-6 months+ | Long-term custom-moulded orthosis | Office work 8-12 weeks; manual work 4-6 months; low-impact sport from 6 months | Charcot and AVN cases remain strictly non-weight-bearing for 3 months and progress only when CT confirms union. Driving: right foot 8-12 weeks minimum; left foot in an automatic 4-6 weeks. High-impact sport is often not advisable after TTC fusion. Long-term follow-up monitors for a stress fracture at the nail tip (years 1-3) and adjacent-joint arthritis (years 3 and beyond). Complications

Nonunion
Incidence
10-30 percent overall; up to 40-50 percent in AVN and Charcot
Recognition
Persistent pain greater than 6-9 months; no progressive bridging trabeculae on CT; lucency at the joint lines on serial radiographs
Prevention & management
Prevention: meticulous fish-scaling, structural graft in high-risk cases, BMP adjunct, prolonged non-weight-bearing (3 months) in Charcot/AVN. Management: CT at 6 months; revision with bone graft, nail exchange or addition of plate fixation at 9-12 months if symptomatic
Malunion (especially varus)
Incidence
5-15 percent
Recognition
Weight-bearing hindfoot view shows varus greater than 5 degrees; lateral border foot pain; fifth-metatarsal overload; lateral ulceration
Prevention & management
Prevention: aim for a plantigrade foot with 5 degrees of valgus intra-operatively; check alignment with the leg hanging free before final nail insertion. Management: custom-moulded orthosis for mild varus; revision osteotomy for symptomatic varus greater than 5 degrees
Stress fracture at the nail tip
Incidence
3-8 percent
Recognition
New anterior tibial pain 1-3 years post-operatively; transverse fracture line at the proximal nail tip on radiograph
Prevention & management
Prevention: use a long nail (180-300 mm) to the tibial metaphysis; avoid short nails ending in the diaphysis. Management: long-leg cast or brace; revision with a longer nail if symptomatic nonunion
Lateral plantar nerve injury
Incidence
1-5 percent
Recognition
Numbness or burning on the medial sole and lateral midfoot; positive Tinel sign; plantar neuroma
Prevention & management
Prevention: lateralised plantar incision; identify the lateral plantar bundle medially and retract; do not transect subcutaneous tissue blindly. Management: expectant for numbness; neuroma excision or burial for a painful neuroma
Plantar wound breakdown / infection
Incidence
3-10 percent
Recognition
Plantar incision dehiscence; purulent discharge; exposed nail; deep infection
Prevention & management
Prevention: meticulous layered closure; non-weight-bearing on the plantar heel until healed (3-6 weeks); strict glucose control in diabetics. Management: wound care, oral or IV antibiotics; debridement and vacuum-assisted closure; nail removal only as a last resort
Deep infection (osteomyelitis)
Incidence
2-7 percent
Recognition
Persistent pain, fever, elevated CRP/ESR; deep wound drainage; bone lucency around the implant
Prevention & management
Prevention: sterile technique; peri-operative antibiotics; minimise operating time; avoid prolonged tourniquet. Management: two-stage revision β€” implant removal, debridement, antibiotic cement spacer, 6-8 weeks IV antibiotics, then revision nail
Screw malposition / soft-tissue irritation
Incidence
2-5 percent
Recognition
Pain over a screw head; Tinel sign from a screw irritating a nerve; CT shows a screw outside bone
Prevention & management
Prevention: measure screw lengths on fluoroscopy; bicortical purchase in the calcaneus; avoid medial screw protrusion. Management: remove the symptomatic screw once arthrodesis is healed (6-12 months)
DVT / PE
Incidence
1-3 percent
Recognition
Calf swelling and pain; PE: pleuritic chest pain, hypoxia, tachycardia; CTPA is definitive
Prevention & management
Prevention: mechanical prophylaxis (foot pumps, TED stockings); chemical prophylaxis per local protocol (enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 4-6 weeks in high-risk patients). Management: treat per haematology guidelines
Complex regional pain syndrome
Incidence
1-3 percent
Recognition
Disproportionate pain; allodynia; hyperaesthesia; stiffness; trophic changes; bone demineralisation
Prevention & management
Prevention: gentle tissue handling; early mobilisation; vitamin C 500 mg daily for 6 weeks. Management: multidisciplinary pain clinic; gabapentinoids, bisphosphonates, sympathetic blocks; physiotherapy
Adjacent joint arthritis (Chopart, midfoot)
Incidence
Up to 30 percent at 10 years
Recognition
Progressive midfoot pain; collapse of the medial longitudinal arch; midfoot swelling
Prevention & management
Prevention: plantigrade alignment at the index fusion; avoid overloading adjacent joints. Management: orthosis; midfoot fusion in late cases
Complications β€” recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention & management
Nonunion10-30 percent overall; up to 40-50 percent in AVN and CharcotPersistent pain greater than 6-9 months; no progressive bridging trabeculae on CT; lucency at the joint lines on serial radiographsPrevention: meticulous fish-scaling, structural graft in high-risk cases, BMP adjunct, prolonged non-weight-bearing (3 months) in Charcot/AVN. Management: CT at 6 months; revision with bone graft, nail exchange or addition of plate fixation at 9-12 months if symptomatic
Malunion (especially varus)5-15 percentWeight-bearing hindfoot view shows varus greater than 5 degrees; lateral border foot pain; fifth-metatarsal overload; lateral ulcerationPrevention: aim for a plantigrade foot with 5 degrees of valgus intra-operatively; check alignment with the leg hanging free before final nail insertion. Management: custom-moulded orthosis for mild varus; revision osteotomy for symptomatic varus greater than 5 degrees
Stress fracture at the nail tip3-8 percentNew anterior tibial pain 1-3 years post-operatively; transverse fracture line at the proximal nail tip on radiographPrevention: use a long nail (180-300 mm) to the tibial metaphysis; avoid short nails ending in the diaphysis. Management: long-leg cast or brace; revision with a longer nail if symptomatic nonunion
Lateral plantar nerve injury1-5 percentNumbness or burning on the medial sole and lateral midfoot; positive Tinel sign; plantar neuromaPrevention: lateralised plantar incision; identify the lateral plantar bundle medially and retract; do not transect subcutaneous tissue blindly. Management: expectant for numbness; neuroma excision or burial for a painful neuroma
Plantar wound breakdown / infection3-10 percentPlantar incision dehiscence; purulent discharge; exposed nail; deep infectionPrevention: meticulous layered closure; non-weight-bearing on the plantar heel until healed (3-6 weeks); strict glucose control in diabetics. Management: wound care, oral or IV antibiotics; debridement and vacuum-assisted closure; nail removal only as a last resort
Deep infection (osteomyelitis)2-7 percentPersistent pain, fever, elevated CRP/ESR; deep wound drainage; bone lucency around the implantPrevention: sterile technique; peri-operative antibiotics; minimise operating time; avoid prolonged tourniquet. Management: two-stage revision β€” implant removal, debridement, antibiotic cement spacer, 6-8 weeks IV antibiotics, then revision nail
Screw malposition / soft-tissue irritation2-5 percentPain over a screw head; Tinel sign from a screw irritating a nerve; CT shows a screw outside bonePrevention: measure screw lengths on fluoroscopy; bicortical purchase in the calcaneus; avoid medial screw protrusion. Management: remove the symptomatic screw once arthrodesis is healed (6-12 months)
DVT / PE1-3 percentCalf swelling and pain; PE: pleuritic chest pain, hypoxia, tachycardia; CTPA is definitivePrevention: mechanical prophylaxis (foot pumps, TED stockings); chemical prophylaxis per local protocol (enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 4-6 weeks in high-risk patients). Management: treat per haematology guidelines
Complex regional pain syndrome1-3 percentDisproportionate pain; allodynia; hyperaesthesia; stiffness; trophic changes; bone demineralisationPrevention: gentle tissue handling; early mobilisation; vitamin C 500 mg daily for 6 weeks. Management: multidisciplinary pain clinic; gabapentinoids, bisphosphonates, sympathetic blocks; physiotherapy
Adjacent joint arthritis (Chopart, midfoot)Up to 30 percent at 10 yearsProgressive midfoot pain; collapse of the medial longitudinal arch; midfoot swellingPrevention: plantigrade alignment at the index fusion; avoid overloading adjacent joints. Management: orthosis; midfoot fusion in late cases

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

PLANTARPLANTAR β€” the entry portal: anatomy and dangers

P
Plantar incision (lateralised)
Slightly LATERAL to the midline of the heel pad, over the lateral half, to keep the lateral plantar bundle medial and protected
L
Lateral plantar bundle
The principal danger; runs from the medial heel toward the lateral midfoot β€” stay lateral to the medial band of plantar fascia
A
Align in both planes
Confirm entry with the tibial canal on BOTH AP and lateral fluoroscopy before reaming
N
Nail trajectory
90 degrees to the plantar foot, or with 5-10 degrees of valgus, in line with the tibial mechanical axis
T
Tendons at risk
FHL (medial), peroneus longus (lateral), Achilles (posterior) β€” keep the guide wire and reamer centred
A
Achilles (assess equinus)
Lengthen first if equinus β€” percutaneous triple hemisection or Z-lengthening β€” to achieve a plantigrade foot
R
Ream sequentially
Over a guide wire confirmed on AP and lateral; ream to 1 mm greater than the chosen nail diameter
Mnemonic

HINDFOOTHINDFOOT β€” indications and decision-making

H
Hindfoot arthritis (both joints)
Post-traumatic OA or inflammatory arthritis with global hindfoot disease
I
Indication: failed TAR
With subtalar arthritis or talar component subsidence where revision arthroplasty is not feasible
N
Neuropathic (Charcot)
Eichenholtz stage 2-3 with hindfoot instability, ulceration or deformity
D
Dead talus
Avascular necrosis with collapse; consider talectomy and tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis
F
Failed prior fusion
Nonunion of an ankle or subtalar arthrodesis, or symptomatic adjacent joint disease
O
Osteotomy for deformity
Post-traumatic varus, equinus or cavus needing correction across both joints
O
Older / lower-demand patient
High-activity patients should be considered for staged fusion to preserve motion
T
Tumour / bony defect
Large defect requiring intercalary reconstruction across the hindfoot
Lateral plantar neurovascular bundle

The trap: A plantar midline entry or a medialised nail transits directly through the bundle as it courses from the medial heel toward the lateral midfoot. The fix: Place the incision lateral to the heel-pad midline, stay lateral to the medial band of plantar fascia, dissect bluntly, identify the bundle medially and retract it. It must never be the lateral-most structure in the wound.

Medial plantar nerve

Location: Runs along the medial border of the plantar fascia from the medial heel toward the great toe; spared by a lateralised entry but at risk with extensive medial dissection or correction of severe valgus. Risk: Numbness and a painful neuroma of the medial sole and great toe. Identify and protect it during any medial dissection for tibial preparation or graft harvest.

Posterior tibial neurovascular bundle

Location: The posterior tibial artery, tibial nerve and veins lie behind the medial malleolus and enter the foot beneath the flexor retinaculum (tarsal tunnel), branching into medial and lateral plantar nerves. Risk: In a posterior approach to the ankle and subtalar joint, posterior retractors can injure or stretch the bundle. Identify it before any posterior capsular or subtalar work and keep retractors anterior to it.

Talar AVN β€” nonunion risk

The trap: In osteonecrosis of the talus the talar body is largely avascular, so standard tibiotalar coaptation has a nonunion rate up to 40-50 percent. The fix: Recognise AVN pre-operatively (MRI, or CT with sclerosis/crescent sign). Plan STRUCTURAL bone graft (tricortical iliac crest or femoral-head allograft) bridging the plafond to the calcaneus, or a tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis after talectomy. Warn the patient about the high nonunion rate and possible revision.

Charcot β€” bone quality and alignment

Why different: Charcot bone is hyperaemic, osteopenic and fragmented with poor screw purchase; the construct is load-bearing from day 1 and union runs 50-70 percent. Implications: Use a long nail to the tibial metaphysis, supplement with autogenous graft (tibial reamings, iliac crest or proximal tibia), consider adjunctive plating of the tibiotalar or subtalar joints, and accept prolonged non-weight-bearing (often 3 months) until union. Correct the rocker-bottom deformity and restore a plantigrade foot.

Varus malalignment β€” worst outcome

The trap: Leaving the hindfoot in varus loads the lateral border, causing fifth-metatarsal overload, lateral foot pain and lateral ulceration. The fix: Aim for a plantigrade foot with 5 degrees of valgus, neutral forefoot and the tibial axis through the central hindfoot. Small degrees of residual valgus are tolerated; varus is not.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 62-year-old man with Type 2 diabetes and 6 months of midfoot and ankle swelling presents with a rocker-bottom deformity of the right foot and a non-healing plantar ulcer under the cuboid. The foot is warm, swollen and erythematous; protective sensation is absent on 10 g monofilament testing. What is your assessment and management plan?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 58-year-old woman had a total ankle replacement 8 years ago for post-traumatic ankle arthritis. She now has progressive hindfoot pain, swelling and difficulty weight-bearing. Radiographs show talar component subsidence, polyethylene wear and subtalar joint-space narrowing, and conservative measures have failed. What are the options and which do you recommend?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 45-year-old labourer presents 2 years after a talar neck fracture with collapse of the talar body and severe hindfoot pain. He is otherwise healthy and active. MRI shows extensive avascular necrosis of the talar body. What are the surgical options, and which do you recommend?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (hindfoot nail) β€” exam-day essentials

Indication

  • Fuses BOTH the tibiotalar and subtalar joints through one retrograde nail β€” distinct from isolated ankle or subtalar fusion
  • Primary triggers: combined ankle and subtalar arthritis; failed TAR with subtalar arthritis; Charcot (Eichenholtz 2-3); talar AVN; severe deformity; failed prior fusion
  • Absolute contraindications: active infection, uncorrectable ischaemia, open ulceration at the incision; relative: young high-demand, severe osteoporosis, smoker

Critical anatomy at the entry portal

  • Plantar entry slightly LATERAL to the heel-pad midline, over the lateral half, in line with the tibial canal on AP and lateral
  • Lateral plantar neurovascular bundle β€” the principal danger; lies medial to a lateral entry; identify and retract medially
  • Medial plantar nerve β€” at risk with extensive medial dissection; posterior tibial bundle β€” at risk in a posterior approach
  • Sural nerve at risk laterally; assess the Achilles with the Silfverskiold test and lengthen if equinus greater than 5 degrees

Pre-operative planning

  • Clinical: alignment, soft-tissue envelope, ulceration, neurovascular status, Achilles contracture, the contralateral foot for reference
  • Imaging: weight-bearing AP/mortise/lateral, Saltzman view, CT for bone loss, MRI for AVN or Charcot
  • Optimise: HbA1c less than 7.5 percent, albumin greater than 30 g/L, no active infection
  • Plan graft: tibial reamings for primary cases; structural iliac crest or femoral-head allograft for AVN/Charcot; BMP adjunct in revision

Operative sequence

  • 1. Position supine on a radiolucent table, C-arm contralateral; 2. Lengthen the Achilles first if equinus
  • 3. Prepare the ankle (anterior or lateral transfibular) and the subtalar joint (sinus tarsi) β€” fish-scale to bleeding bone
  • 4. Plantar entry lateral to the heel-pad midline; guide wire confirmed on AP and lateral; 5. Ream to 1 mm greater than the nail, collect reamings
  • 6. Correct to a plantigrade foot (5 degrees valgus); 7. Pack graft into both joints; 8. Insert a long nail (180-300 mm) to the metaphysis; 9. Multiplanar locking; 10-11. Meticulous layered closure, posterior splint

Danger zones

  • Lateral plantar bundle β€” lateralise the incision, identify and retract medially
  • Varus malalignment β€” the worst-tolerated error; aim for 5 degrees of valgus
  • Short nail in the diaphysis β€” stress fracture at the tip; use a long nail to the metaphysis
  • Eccentric entry β€” varus/valgus malalignment or tibial cortical perforation; confirm fluoroscopy at each step
  • Achilles over-lengthening β€” calcaneal gait, push-off weakness, plantar heel ulceration

Implants and fixation

  • Long hindfoot nail (180-300 mm) to the tibial metaphysis β€” preferred over short nails
  • Diameter 10-13 mm, reamed 1 mm greater than the nail
  • At least two calcaneal locking screws in different planes for rotational control; add a talar screw if bone permits
  • Two proximal tibial screws in different planes via the targeting guide
  • Graft: cancellous autograft for primary cases; structural allograft or iliac crest for AVN/Charcot; BMP in revision

Complications

  • Nonunion 10-30 percent (up to 40-50 percent in AVN/Charcot); revision with graft, nail exchange or plate
  • Varus malunion 5-15 percent β€” the worst-tolerated error; revision osteotomy if greater than 5 degrees
  • Stress fracture at the nail tip 3-8 percent β€” prevented by a long nail
  • Lateral plantar nerve injury 1-5 percent; plantar wound breakdown 3-10 percent; deep infection 2-7 percent
  • DVT/PE 1-3 percent; CRPS 1-3 percent; adjacent joint arthritis up to 30 percent at 10 years

Post-operative protocol

  • Strict non-weight-bearing for 6-12 weeks (3 months in Charcot and AVN)
  • Posterior splint for 2 weeks, then a removable boot or short-leg cast
  • CT at 6 months to confirm union if uncertain on radiographs
  • Progressive weight-bearing in a boot from 6-8 weeks (12 weeks in Charcot/AVN)
  • Long-term custom-moulded orthosis; driving 8-12 weeks (right foot); manual work 4-6 months

Special cases

  • Failed TAR: TTC nail is the gold-standard salvage; structural graft for talar bone loss; long nail to the metaphysis; satisfaction 75-85 percent
  • Charcot: long nail, graft and BMP, strict 3-month non-weight-bearing; limb salvage 85-90 percent at 5 years; union 50-70 percent
  • Talar AVN: structural graft improves union; consider talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis for severe collapse; union 50-70 percent
  • Severe deformity: Achilles lengthening, soft-tissue release, osteotomy as needed; correct to plantigrade with 5 degrees of valgus
  • Young high-demand patient: consider staged ankle and subtalar fusion to preserve motion; counsel on stiffness and irreversibility

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology of the indications. TTC arthrodesis is a salvage operation, so its epidemiology tracks its indications. Combined tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis most often follows intra-articular ankle fractures or inflammatory arthritis. Failed total ankle replacement is a growing indication: modern TAR has a 10-year survivorship of 80-90 percent in most series, but a proportion fail by talar component subsidence, polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, deep infection or progression of subtalar arthritis. Charcot neuroarthropathy is increasing with the global diabetes pandemic and is a primary indication for the TTC nail. Classifications that guide decision-making.

Eichenholtz
Stage / type
Stage 1 (development)
Features
Swelling, erythema, warmth; no deformity; fragmentation on imaging
Implication for TTC nailing
Conservative β€” total contact cast; do not operate
Eichenholtz
Stage / type
Stage 2 (coalescence)
Features
Fragmentation and subluxation; reducing warmth
Implication for TTC nailing
Consider TTC nailing if deformity progresses
Eichenholtz
Stage / type
Stage 3 (reconstruction)
Features
Consolidation with residual deformity
Implication for TTC nailing
TTC nailing is the primary reconstruction
Brodsky
Stage / type
Type 1
Features
Midfoot (most common)
Implication for TTC nailing
Often managed with offloading/orthoses; TTC if hindfoot involved
Brodsky
Stage / type
Type 2
Features
Subtalar and Chopart joints
Implication for TTC nailing
TTC nailing when unstable or ulcerated
Brodsky
Stage / type
Type 3A / 3B
Features
Ankle (3A); ankle with calcaneal involvement (3B)
Implication for TTC nailing
TTC nailing for 3A; consider external fixation or staging for 3B
Charcot neuroarthropathy β€” staging and localisation
SystemStage / typeFeaturesImplication for TTC nailing
EichenholtzStage 1 (development)Swelling, erythema, warmth; no deformity; fragmentation on imagingConservative β€” total contact cast; do not operate
EichenholtzStage 2 (coalescence)Fragmentation and subluxation; reducing warmthConsider TTC nailing if deformity progresses
EichenholtzStage 3 (reconstruction)Consolidation with residual deformityTTC nailing is the primary reconstruction
BrodskyType 1Midfoot (most common)Often managed with offloading/orthoses; TTC if hindfoot involved
BrodskyType 2Subtalar and Chopart jointsTTC nailing when unstable or ulcerated
BrodskyType 3A / 3BAnkle (3A); ankle with calcaneal involvement (3B)TTC nailing for 3A; consider external fixation or staging for 3B

For talar avascular necrosis, the Ficat-Arlet classification (originally for the hip) can be applied to the talus, and MRI (sagittal STIR/T1) is the investigation of choice to define the extent of necrosis and talar-body viability. Outcomes by indication. Union and satisfaction differ markedly by pathology, which is why pre-operative counselling must be indication-specific.

Primary combined arthritis
Union rate
70-90 percent
Special considerations
Standard technique; correct alignment carefully
Adjuncts often required
Cancellous autograft; BMP occasionally
Failed TAR
Union rate
75-85 percent
Special considerations
Talar bone loss; use a long nail; prepare the tibia to host bone
Adjuncts often required
Structural allograft; antibiotic cement spacer if infected
Charcot neuroarthropathy
Union rate
50-70 percent
Special considerations
Poor bone quality; long nail to the metaphysis; staged offloading
Adjuncts often required
Autograft; BMP; sometimes an adjunctive plate
Avascular necrosis of the talus
Union rate
50-70 percent
Special considerations
Talar collapse; consider talectomy with structural graft
Adjuncts often required
Tricortical iliac crest or femoral-head allograft
Severe deformity
Union rate
70-85 percent
Special considerations
Soft-tissue release, Achilles lengthening, osteotomy correction
Adjuncts often required
Autograft; internal bone stimulator
Indication-specific outcomes and technical nuances
IndicationUnion rateSpecial considerationsAdjuncts often required
Primary combined arthritis70-90 percentStandard technique; correct alignment carefullyCancellous autograft; BMP occasionally
Failed TAR75-85 percentTalar bone loss; use a long nail; prepare the tibia to host boneStructural allograft; antibiotic cement spacer if infected
Charcot neuroarthropathy50-70 percentPoor bone quality; long nail to the metaphysis; staged offloadingAutograft; BMP; sometimes an adjunctive plate
Avascular necrosis of the talus50-70 percentTalar collapse; consider talectomy with structural graftTricortical iliac crest or femoral-head allograft
Severe deformity70-85 percentSoft-tissue release, Achilles lengthening, osteotomy correctionAutograft; internal bone stimulator

Primary TTC arthrodesis. A systematic review of retrograde hindfoot nailing reports union rates of 70-90 percent with modern compression and angle-stable nail designs. Patient satisfaction exceeds 75 percent, with substantial pain relief and improved function; gait analysis shows near-normal ankle power but loss of hindfoot inversion and eversion. AOFAS scores improve from a mean of 30-40 pre-operatively to 70-80 post-operatively. Time to union is 3-6 months in primary cases and up to 9-12 months in Charcot, AVN and revision. Failed total ankle replacement. A meta-analysis of TAR failures converted to a TTC nail reports union of 75-85 percent with satisfaction approaching that of primary TTC. The TTC nail is now considered the gold-standard salvage for failed TAR with subtalar arthritis; bone loss from the explanted talar component often requires structural graft or bone-substitute augmentation. Charcot neuroarthropathy. A multi-centre review of TTC nailing for Charcot reports union of 50-70 percent with limb salvage exceeding 85 percent at 5 years; correction of rocker-bottom deformity permits ulcer healing in 70-90 percent. Solid intramedullary constructs have largely replaced external fixation, and a long nail extending to the tibial metaphysis is preferred for stable load-sharing. Avascular necrosis of the talus. AVN is a high-risk subset with union of 50-70 percent; structural bone graft (autogenous iliac crest or femoral-head allograft) bridging the plafond to the calcaneus is often required, and talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis (around 70 percent union) is the salvage option for severe AVN with collapse.

References


Evidence

Risk factors for nonunion following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Level I
Patel S, Baker L, Perez J, Vulcano E, Kaplan J, Aiyer A β€’ Foot Ankle Surg (2022)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for nonunion after TTC arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail
  • Diabetes, smoking, Charcot neuroarthropathy and avascular necrosis of the talus were the most consistently reported risk factors for nonunion
  • Overall pooled nonunion rate was approximately 20-30 percent across studies, with Charcot and AVN subgroups having the highest rates
Clinical implication: Pre-operative counselling must address modifiable risk factors (smoking cessation, glycaemic control) and set realistic expectations for Charcot and AVN patients where nonunion rates are highest.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33685828)
Evidence

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a prospective cohort study at a minimum five year follow-up

Level II
Perez-Aznar A, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Bello-Tejeda LL, Alonso-Montero C, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Lopez-Prats FA β€’ Int Orthop (2021)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort study of TTC arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail with minimum five-year follow-up
  • Union achieved in the majority of patients; AOFAS and VAS pain scores improved significantly from pre-operative values
  • Complications included nonunion, stress fracture at the nail tip and superficial wound infection; long nails to the tibial metaphysis were associated with lower stress-fracture rates
Clinical implication: TTC arthrodesis with a retrograde nail gives durable pain relief and functional improvement at five years; use a long nail extending to the tibial metaphysis to reduce stress-fracture risk.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33443596)
Evidence

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with structural allograft for management of large osseous defects of the hindfoot and ankle: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Level I
Cifaldi A, Thompson M, Abicht B β€’ J Foot Ankle Surg (2022)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of TTC arthrodesis with structural allograft for large osseous defects
  • Union rates were acceptable with structural allograft supplementation, though lower than in primary arthrodesis without bone loss
  • Femoral-head and tibial allograft were the most commonly used structural grafts; bulk allograft was required for failed TAR conversion and talar AVN
Clinical implication: Structural allograft is effective for bridging large bone defects in TTC arthrodesis, particularly in failed TAR and talar AVN; counsel about lower union rates than primary cases.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 35585002)
Evidence

Comparison of dynamic versus static locked retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation: evaluation of the RAIN database

Level III
Dujela MD, Berlet GC, Houng BE, Hyer CF β€’ J Foot Ankle Surg (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Multi-centre RAIN database study comparing dynamic compression versus static locked TTC arthrodesis
  • Both fixation techniques achieved satisfactory union, with dynamic compression showing a trend toward faster time to radiographic union
  • Complication profiles were similar between groups; nail-related complications were driven by stress fracture at the nail tip in short nails
Clinical implication: Both dynamic and static locking achieve reliable union; nail length to the tibial metaphysis is the more important technical variable than locking mode.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 36941141)
Evidence

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde intramedullary nail fixation: comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Level III
Wukich DK, Mallory BR, Suder NC, Rosario BL β€’ J Foot Ankle Surg (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Comparative study of TTC arthrodesis with a retrograde nail in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients
  • Non-diabetic patients had higher union rates and lower complication rates than diabetic patients
  • Diabetic patients with well-controlled disease had outcomes approaching those of non-diabetics; glycaemic control was a key modifiable factor
Clinical implication: Diabetes is a significant risk factor for nonunion and complications after TTC arthrodesis; optimise glycaemic control pre-operatively and counsel about higher risk.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26015305)
Evidence

Mid-term follow-up of patients with hindfoot arthrodesis with retrograde compression intramedullary nail in Charcot neuroarthropathy of the hindfoot

Level III
Chraim M, Krenn S, Alrabai HM, Trnka HJ, Bock P β€’ Bone Joint J (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective multi-centre series of Charcot hindfoot patients treated with a retrograde compression TTC nail with minimum two-year follow-up
  • Union rates in the Charcot cohort were lower than primary TTC arthrodesis, consistent with the published literature; limb salvage remained high
  • Long nail constructs extending to the tibial metaphysis and adjunctive bone grafting were associated with improved union
Clinical implication: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a recognised indication for the TTC nail with lower union rates than primary fusion; use long nails and supplementary bone graft to maximise limb salvage.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 29437061)
Evidence

Tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde compression intramedullary nail fixation for salvage of failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review

Level IV
Donnenwerth MP, Roukis TS β€’ Clin Podiatr Med Surg (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of TTC arthrodesis with a retrograde compression nail for salvage of failed total ankle replacement
  • The TTC nail is an effective salvage strategy for failed TAR with satisfactory union rates and functional improvement in most reported series
  • Talar bone loss from the explanted component frequently required structural graft augmentation; a long nail to the tibial metaphysis was recommended
Clinical implication: The TTC nail is the gold-standard salvage for failed TAR with subtalar arthritis or talar component subsidence where revision arthroplasty is not feasible; anticipate talar bone loss and plan for structural graft.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23465809)
Evidence

Salvage of avascular necrosis of the talus by combined ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis without structural bone graft

Level IV
Tenenbaum S, Stockton KG, Bariteau JT, Brodsky JW β€’ Foot Ankle Int (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Case series of patients with AVN of the talus treated with TTC arthrodesis without structural bone graft
  • Combined ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis can salvage the AVN talus even without structural grafting, though union rates are lower than primary TTC
  • Pre-operative staging of talar AVN severity guides the choice between in-situ fusion and talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis
Clinical implication: Talar AVN is a high-risk indication for TTC arthrodesis; structural bone graft improves union and should be used when collapse is present. Talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis is the salvage option for advanced cases.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25377390)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Posterolateral Approach to the AnkleLateral Extensile Approach to Calcaneus
Browse all procedures