Simultaneous fusion of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints using a retrograde intramedullary nail | advanced
Surgical Imaging

The trap: A plantar midline entry incision or medialised nail entry transits directly through (or immediately adjacent to) the lateral plantar nerve, artery and vein as they course from the medial heel pad distally toward the lateral midfoot.
The fix: Place the entry incision slightly LATERAL to the plantar midline, over the lateral half of the heel pad. Stay lateral to the medial band of the plantar fascia. Dissect bluntly through subcutaneous fat, identify the lateral plantar neurovascular bundle medially, retract medially, and enter the calcaneus under direct vision. The bundle should NEVER be the lateral-most structure in the wound.
Location: The medial plantar nerve runs along the medial border of the plantar fascia from the medial heel toward the great toe; it is generally spared by a lateralised entry portal but is at risk with extensive medial dissection or with correction of severe hindfoot valgus.
Risk: Injury produces numbness and painful neuroma of the medial sole and great toe β a significant functional disability. Identify and protect it during any medial dissection for tibial preparation or graft harvest.
Location: The posterior tibial artery, tibial nerve and accompanying veins lie posterior to the medial malleolus and pass into the foot beneath the flexor retinaculum (tarsal tunnel).
Risk: In a posterior approach to the ankle and subtalar joint for joint preparation, retractors placed posteriorly can injure or stretch this bundle. Identify it before any posterior capsular or subtalar work, and keep retractors anterior to the bundle under direct vision.
The trap: In osteonecrosis of the talus (post-traumatic, post-TAR, idiopathic), the talar body is largely avascular. Standard TTC techniques that rely on tibiotalar coaptation will have a high rate of nonunion (up to 40-50%).
The fix: Recognise AVN preoperatively (MRI or CT with sclerosis/crescent sign). Plan for STRUCTURAL bone graft (tricortical iliac crest or femoral head allograft) bridging the tibial plafond to the calcaneus, or a hindfoot nail with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis after talectomy. Warn the patient about the high nonunion rate and the potential need for revision.
Why different: Charcot feet have a hyperaemic, osteopenic, fragmented bone with poor screw purchase. The construct is load-bearing from day 1, and union rates are 50-70% in published series, lower than primary TTC.
Implications: Use a long hindfoot nail extending to the tibial metaphysis, supplement with autogenous bone graft (reamings from the tibia, iliac crest, or proximal tibia), consider adjunctive plate fixation of the tibiotalar or subtalar joints, and accept prolonged non-weight-bearing (often 3 months) until radiographic union. Correct the rocker-bottom deformity and restore a plantigrade foot.
The trap: Leaving the hindfoot in varus at the end of TTC fusion produces a poor outcome β the patient loads the lateral border, develops fifth MT overload, lateral foot pain, and may ulcerate over the base of the fifth metatarsal.
The fix: Aim for a plantigrade foot with hindfoot valgus of 5 degrees, neutral forefoot, and tibial axis passing through the central hindfoot. If the foot is plantigrade but in varus, the outcome is worse than in valgus β small degrees of residual valgus are well tolerated, varus is not.
P.L.A.N.T.A.RPLANTAR β Entry Portal Anatomy and Dangers
H.I.N.D.F.O.O.THINDFOOT β Indications and Decision-Making
N.A.I.LNAIL β Intraoperative Pearls
Surgical Indications
Primary Indications for TTC Arthrodesis
- Combined tibiotalar AND subtalar arthritis β most common indication; isolated ankle or subtalar fusion will not address the patient's pain
- Failed total ankle replacement (TAR) with subtalar arthritis, talar component subsidence, or aseptic loosening where revision TAR is not feasible
- Charcot neuroarthropathy (Eichenholtz stage 2-3) of the hindfoot with instability, deformity, or ulceration β a load-sharing construct that bypasses both joints
- Avascular necrosis of the talus with collapse β either preserve the talus with structural graft bridging to the calcaneus, or perform talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis
- Severe hindfoot deformity (post-traumatic varus, equinocavovarus, equinus contracture) that requires correction across both joints
- Failed prior ankle or subtalar arthrodesis with nonunion, malunion, or symptomatic adjacent joint disease
- Tumour resection of the talus requiring intercalary reconstruction
Relative Indications
- Salvage after failed TAR in a lower-demand patient where conversion to TTC nail is the definitive solution
- Talar body fracture with severe comminution not amenable to ORIF
- Severe post-traumatic hindfoot bone loss requiring bridging graft
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Active infection (osteomyelitis of the tibia, talus, or calcaneus) β must be cleared first with staged debridement
- Uncorrectable vascular insufficiency β check ankle-brachial pressure index; revascularise first
- Severe peripheral neuropathy with open ulceration through the planned incision β heal the wound first
Relative:
- Young, high-demand patient β consider staged ankle and subtalar fusion to preserve whatever hindfoot motion is possible
- Active Charcot with severe bone fragmentation (Brodsky 3B) β consider external fixation or staged management
- Smoker with poor healing β counsel about nonunion risk (up to 2-3x higher); consider bone graft adjuncts
- Severe osteoporosis (T-score less than minus 3) β consider plate-augmented construct or external fixation
Evidence for Operative Treatment
Outcomes of Primary TTC Arthrodesis
- A systematic review of retrograde hindfoot nailing for combined hindfoot pathology reports union rates of 70-90% in primary cases with modern compression/angle-stable nail designs
- Patient satisfaction exceeds 75% in most series, with substantial pain relief and improved function; gait analysis shows near-normal ankle power but loss of hindfoot inversion/eversion
- AOFAS scores improve from a mean of 30-40 preoperatively to 70-80 postoperatively in most series
- Time to union: 3-6 months in primary cases; up to 9-12 months in Charcot, AVN, and revision
Failed Total Ankle Replacement
- A meta-analysis of TAR failures converted to TTC nail reports union rates of 75-85%, with patient satisfaction approaching that of primary TTC
- Tibiotalocalcaneal nail is now considered the gold standard salvage for failed TAR with subtalar arthritis
- Bone loss from the explanted talar component often requires structural graft or bone substitute augmentation
Charcot Neuroarthropathy
- A multi-centre review of TTC nailing for Charcot reports union rates of 50-70%, with limb salvage rates exceeding 85% at 5 years
- Rocker-bottom deformity correction with the nail permits ulcer healing in 70-90% of patients
- Solid intramedullary constructs have largely replaced external fixation for Charcot hindfoot reconstruction
- A long hindfoot nail extending to the tibial metaphysis is preferred for stable load-sharing
Avascular Necrosis of the Talus
- AVN is a high-risk subset: union rates 50-70% in published series, lower than primary TTC
- Structural bone graft (autogenous iliac crest tricortical or femoral head allograft) bridging the tibial plafond to the calcaneus is often required
- Talectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis is a salvage option for severe AVN with collapse
Indication-Specific Outcomes and Technical Nuances
Key Evidence
Risk factors for nonunion following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a prospective cohort study at a minimum five year follow-up
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with structural allograft for management of large osseous defects of the hindfoot and ankle: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Comparison of dynamic versus static locked retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation: evaluation of the RAIN database
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde intramedullary nail fixation: comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
βA 62-year-old man with Type 2 diabetes and a 6-month history of midfoot and ankle swelling presents with a rocker-bottom deformity of the right foot. He has a non-healing plantar ulcer under the cuboid. Examination shows a warm, swollen, erythematous foot with intact sensation (protective sensation absent on 10 g monofilament testing). What is your assessment and management plan?β
βA 58-year-old woman underwent a total ankle replacement 8 years ago for post-traumatic ankle arthritis. She now presents with progressive hindfoot pain, swelling, and difficulty weight-bearing. Radiographs show talar component subsidence, polyethylene wear, and subtalar joint space narrowing. She has failed conservative management. What are the options and which do you recommend?β
βA 45-year-old labourer presents 2 years after a talar neck fracture with collapse of the talar body and severe hindfoot pain. He is otherwise healthy and active. MRI shows extensive avascular necrosis of the talar body. What are the surgical options, and which do you recommend?β