Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Bioabsorbable Materials

Back to Topics
Contents
0%
Basic ScienceBiomaterials

Bioabsorbable Materials

Comprehensive guide to bioabsorbable implants for FRCS examination

complete
Updated: 2025-01-15

Bioabsorbable Materials

High Yield Overview

BIOABSORBABLE MATERIALS

PGA, PLA, and PLLA Implants

β€”Common
β€”clinical relevance
β€”blue

Material Classes

PGA
PatternPolyglycolic Acid
TreatmentFast Degradation
PLLA
PatternPoly-L-Lactic Acid
TreatmentSlow Degradation
PLGA
PatternCopolymer
TreatmentTunable Properties

Critical Must-Knows

  • Definition: Synthetic polymers (Polyesters) that degrade in the body via Hydrolysis, eliminating the need for removal surgery
  • Definition: Commonly used for interference screws, suture anchors, and pediatric fractures
  • Mechanism: Degradation via Hydrolysis (uptake of water breaks ester bonds)
  • Management: Used where metal removal would be obligatory or difficult

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Biocompatibility (Foreign body reaction is a risk)
  • "
    Strength retention profile (Must last long enough for bone healing)
  • "
    Risk of Foreign Body Reaction (Sterile abscess/cystic change) especially with PGA
  • "
    Osteoconductive composites (added TCP/HA) help bone replacement

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Hydrolytic degradation pathway of polylactic acid (PLA)
Click to expand
Hydrolytic degradation of polylactic acid (PLA), the key mechanism underlying bioabsorbable implant function. Top row: Long PLA polymer chain showing repeating lactic acid units (methyl groups CH₃, ester linkages C=O) reacts with water (H-O-H). Middle row: Chain scission via hydrolysis produces shorter polymer fragments plus cleaved oligomer units. Bottom row: Progressive degradation through multiple hydrolysis steps ultimately yields lactic acid monomers (containing CH₃, hydroxyl groups, and carboxylic acid), which enter the Krebs cycle for metabolic clearance. This non-enzymatic bulk erosion mechanism explains why PGA (hydrophilic) degrades faster than PLLA (hydrophobic), and why rapid degradation causes 'acid dump' reactions.Credit: Knixon4 via Wikimedia - CC BY-SA 4.0

Exam Warning

Degradation Mechanism

Hydrolysis: It is NOT enzymatic. Water breaks ester bonds.

The 'Acid Dump' Risk

PGA (Rapid): Fast degradation releases acid spike β†’ overwhems buffer β†’ Sterile Abscess.

PLLA Profile

Hydrophobic: Very slow degradation (years). Less reaction, but foreign body remains.

Composition & Types

Common Polymers

1. Polyglycolic Acid (PGA):

  • Hydrophilic (loves water).
  • Fast degradation: Loses strength in ~6 weeks. Absorbed by ~6 months.
  • Problem: High rate of foreign body reaction (sterile abscess) due to "acid dump".
  • Use: Rapidly healing tissues / Sutures (Vicryl is Polyglactin).

2. Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA):

  • Hydrophobic.
  • Slow degradation: Retains strength for over 12 months. Absorbed over 3-5 years.
  • Problem: Crystalline debris can cause late reactions.
  • Use: ACL screws, Meniscal arrows.

3. Co-polymers (PLGA/PLDLA):

  • Mixing L-Lactic and D-Lactic acids creates an Amorphous (non-crystalline) structure.
  • Tunable degradation rate (intermediate).

4. Bio-Composites:

  • Polymer + Bioceramic (TCP or Hydroxyapatite).
  • Benefit: The ceramic buffers the acidic byproducts (alkaline) and promotes bone ingrowth.

At a Glance

Bioabsorbable materials are synthetic polyester polymers that degrade in vivo via hydrolysis, eliminating the need for removal surgery. PGA (polyglycolic acid) degrades rapidly (weeks-months) with 5-10% risk of sterile abscess from acid byproduct accumulation, while PLLA (poly-L-lactic acid) is hydrophobic with slow degradation (3-5 years). Common applications include ACL interference screws, meniscal arrows, and paediatric transphyseal pins. Bio-composites (polymer + TCP/hydroxyapatite) buffer acidic byproducts and promote osteoconduction. Key advantages include no stress shielding and MRI compatibility, but they are weaker than metal and carry risks of tunnel widening and brittle screw breakage during insertion.

Mnemonic

G-L-Very SlowDegradation Speed

P
PGA (Glycolic): Fast (weeks)
P
PLLA (Lactic): Slow (years)
P
PLGA: Variable

Memory Hook:Glycolic Goes (Fast), Lactic Lasts (Slow)

Clinical Relevance

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages:

  • No removal surgery needed.
  • No stress shielding (load transfers gradually as implant weakens).
  • No MRI artifact.
  • Radiolucent (can see fracture healing).

Disadvantages:

  • Weaker than metal (cannot use for load bearing in adults).
  • Sterile Abscess / Osteolysis: 5-10% rate.
  • Screw breakage during insertion (Brittle).
  • "Tunnel widening" in ACL surgery.

Evidence Base

Reaction Rates

Bostman OM. β€’ JBJS Br (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Study of 2500 patients with PGA implants
  • Sterile inflammatory foreign-body reaction occurred in 8%
  • Presented as painful fluctuant swelling 2-3 months post-op
  • Required aspiration or drainage
  • Led to shift towards slower degrading polymers (PLLA)
Clinical Implication: Be vigilant for 'infection' at 3 months - it might be a sterile reaction to the screw.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

Complications

Bioabsorbable vs Metal Interference Screws

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the main types of bioabsorbable polymers used in orthopaedics?

A: (1) PLA (Poly-lactic acid): Most common, slow degradation (2-4 years), good strength. (2) PGA (Poly-glycolic acid): Fast degradation (6-12 months), high crystallinity, historic first-generation. (3) PLLA: L-isomer of PLA, slower degradation than racemic PDLLA. (4) Copolymers (PLGA): Tunable degradation by varying LA:GA ratio. All degrade via hydrolysis to lactic/glycolic acid.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the mechanism of bioabsorbable polymer degradation?

A: Bulk hydrolysis of ester bonds by water. Polymers absorb water, autocatalytic degradation occurs (acidic byproducts accelerate breakdown), molecular weight decreases, mechanical strength lost, fragments phagocytosed by macrophages. Final products (lactic acid, glycolic acid) enter Krebs cycle and are excreted as COβ‚‚ and Hβ‚‚O. Not enzymatic degradation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the clinical applications of bioabsorbable implants in orthopaedics?

A: (1) Suture anchors: Shoulder, hip labral repairs. (2) Interference screws: ACL reconstruction (tibial fixation). (3) Meniscal arrows/darts: Meniscal repair. (4) Pediatric fractures: Avoid growth plate crossing with metal. Advantages: No second surgery for removal, no stress shielding. Not suitable for load-bearing cortical fixation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the complications specific to bioabsorbable implants?

A: (1) Sterile osteolysis: Acidic degradation products cause foreign body reaction, cyst formation. (2) Inflammatory reaction: Crystalline degradation particles. (3) Premature mechanical failure: Loss of strength before healing complete. (4) Incomplete resorption: Residual material detectable years later. (5) MRI artifact: Some products create signal void for extended period.

Exam Pearl

Q: Why did early bioabsorbable implants (PGA) cause high rates of sterile abscess formation?

A: Pure PGA degrades rapidly (3-6 months), releasing high concentrations of glycolic acid in a short period. This acidic environment causes: (1) pH drop, (2) Intense foreign body reaction, (3) Sterile fluid collection/sinus formation. Modern implants use slower-degrading PLA or copolymers (PLGA 85:15) with more gradual acid release, reducing inflammatory response.

Australian Context

FRACS Examination Relevance

Basic Science Viva:

  • Bioabsorbable materials is a core biomaterials topic
  • Expect questions on hydrolysis mechanism (NOT enzymatic)
  • Know PGA vs PLLA degradation rates and clinical implications
  • Understand byproduct metabolism (Krebs cycle)

Key Examination Points:

  • Differentiate bulk erosion vs surface erosion
  • Explain why PGA causes sterile abscess (acid dump)
  • Discuss bio-composite advantages (buffering, osteoconduction)
  • Compare with metal implants for ACL fixation

Common Questions:

  • What screw would you use for ACL reconstruction?
  • Why did early PGA implants fail?
  • What are advantages of bio-composites?

Australian Practice Patterns

Common Clinical Applications:

  • ACL reconstruction: Bio-composite interference screws standard
  • Shoulder surgery: Bioabsorbable suture anchors widely used
  • Paediatric fractures: Preferred to avoid growth plate damage
  • Meniscal repair: Biodegradable arrows/darts

Product Availability:

  • Major manufacturers: Arthrex, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, DePuy
  • Bio-composite products dominate Australian market
  • Pure PLLA and PLGA products still available
  • Titanium alternatives for cost-sensitive settings

Surgeon Preferences:

  • Sports medicine surgeons favour bioabsorbables for revision benefits
  • Some prefer titanium for bone quality concerns
  • Paediatric orthopaedists routinely use bioabsorbable pins
  • Mixed practices in general trauma

TGA Regulation

Regulatory Framework:

  • Bioabsorbable implants classified as medical devices (Class III)
  • TGA approval required before Australian market entry
  • Must meet Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) requirements
  • Post-market surveillance mandatory

Quality Standards:

  • Compliance with international standards (ISO, ASTM)
  • Sterility and biocompatibility testing required
  • Mechanical testing protocols standardized
  • Degradation profile documentation essential

Adverse Event Reporting:

  • Mandatory reporting of sterile osteolysis complications
  • TGA monitors complication rates through Database of Adverse Event Notifications
  • Surgeons encouraged to report unusual reactions
  • Product recalls occur when safety concerns identified

Management Algorithm

πŸ“Š Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Bioabsorbable Materials
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Bioabsorbable MaterialsCredit: OrthoVellum

References

  1. Bostman OM. Absorbable implants for the fixation of fractures. JBJS Br. 1991.
  2. Ambrose CG, Clanton TO. Bioabsorbable implants: review of clinical experience in orthopedic surgery. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004.

Bioabsorbable Quick Facts

High-Yield Exam Summary

Science

  • β€’Polyesters (PLLA, PGA)
  • β€’Degradation: Hydrolysis
  • β€’Byproducts: Acid + Water + CO2

Comparison

  • β€’PGA: Hydrophilic, Fast, Reactive
  • β€’PLLA: Hydrophobic, Slow, Inert
  • β€’PLGA: Tunable
Quick Stats
Reading Time31 min
Related Topics

Cobalt Chrome Alloys

Titanium Alloys

Calcium Phosphate Cements

PMMA Bone Cement