Camptodactyly

Imaging Gallery

Click to expand

Definition

Camptodactyly is defined as a congenital or developmental non-traumatic flexion contracture of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. The term derives from Greek: kamptos (bent) and daktylos (finger). It is distinct from trigger finger (which involves triggering or locking) and Dupuytren contracture (which is acquired and involves metacarpophalangeal joint initially).

The condition most commonly affects the small (fifth) finger PIP joint and is frequently bilateral. The contracture may be present at birth (Type 1 infantile) or develop during adolescence (Type 2 adolescent), or occur as part of a syndrome affecting multiple digits (Type 3 syndromic).

Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence:

• General population incidence approximately 1%
• Bilateral involvement in 75% of cases
• Small finger affected in over 90% of isolated cases
• Equal sex distribution (male to female ratio 1:1)
• Familial cases show autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with variable penetrance

Age Distribution:

• Type 1 (Infantile): Present at birth or develops by age 2 years
• Type 2 (Adolescent): Onset typically between 10-14 years during growth spurt
• Type 3 (Syndromic): Variable age depending on underlying syndrome

Natural History

The natural history varies significantly by type:

Type 1 (Infantile):

• May spontaneously improve or stabilize in 30-40% of cases
• Progression less common than Type 2
• Early intervention with splinting often prevents worsening
• Generally better prognosis for conservative management

Type 2 (Adolescent):

• Typically progressive during adolescent growth spurt
• Stabilizes after skeletal maturity in most cases
• Less likely to spontaneously improve than Type 1
• More likely to require prolonged conservative treatment

Type 3 (Syndromic):

• Natural history depends on underlying syndrome
• Often more severe and involves multiple digits
• May be part of broader musculoskeletal involvement
• Requires multidisciplinary management approach

Anatomical Abnormalities

Multiple anatomical structures have been implicated in camptodactyly pathogenesis:

1. Flexor Digitorum Superficialis (FDS) Abnormalities:

• Short or congenitally tight FDS tendon (most commonly cited)
• Anomalous FDS insertion (lateral rather than volar base of middle phalanx)
• Abnormal muscle belly extending distally into finger
• FDS hypoplasia or complete absence in some cases

2. Lumbrical Muscle Abnormalities:

• Anomalous origin from FDP tendon (more proximal than normal)
• Aberrant insertion onto volar plate or into digit
• Extended muscle belly causing mass effect and tethering
• Accessory lumbrical slips contributing to flexion force

3. Intrinsic Muscle and Accessory Muscle Abnormalities:

• Accessory flexor muscles arising from palm
• Anomalous interosseous muscle insertions
• Accessory bands crossing PIP joint volarly

4. Volar Soft Tissue Abnormalities:

• Volar plate thickening and contracture (secondary or primary)
• Volar skin shortage and dermal tethering
• Check-rein ligament (A3 pulley) contracture
• Collateral ligament contracture and shortening

5. Secondary Joint Changes:

• PIP joint remodeling with condylar flattening (chronic cases)
• Articular cartilage changes and early degeneration
• Joint incongruity and subluxation tendency
• Capsular fibrosis and adhesions

6. Compensatory Deformities:

• DIP joint hyperextension (swan-neck type posture)
• Metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension (in severe cases)
• Metacarpal head remodeling (long-standing deformity)

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology involves an imbalance between flexor and extensor forces at the PIP joint:

Flexion Forces (Increased):

• Tight or anomalous FDS creating constant flexion pull
• Anomalous lumbrical acting as PIP flexor rather than MCP flexor
• Accessory flexor muscles adding to flexion moment
• Volar skin shortage limiting extension

Extension Forces (Decreased or Ineffective):

• Central slip may be attenuated or stretched over time
• Lateral bands displaced volarly due to chronic flexion
• Intrinsic muscles ineffective due to mechanical disadvantage
• Joint capsule contracture preventing passive extension

Progressive Cycle:

• Initial mild contracture leads to prolonged PIP flexion positioning
• Volar structures shorten adaptively (skin, volar plate, collaterals)
• DIP compensatory hyperextension develops
• Joint remodeling occurs with condylar flattening
• Extensor mechanism becomes progressively ineffective
• Deformity becomes increasingly fixed and resistant to treatment

History

A thorough history should elicit:

Onset and Progression:

• Age of onset (infancy vs adolescence)
• Pattern of progression (stable, improving, or worsening)
• Relationship to growth spurts in adolescents
• Any previous treatment attempts and response

Functional Impact:

• Activities of daily living limitations (writing, buttoning, gripping)
• Sports or musical instrument difficulties
• Occupational or school performance impact
• Psychosocial impact (self-consciousness, social avoidance)

Family History:

• Other family members affected (autosomal dominant pattern)
• Other congenital hand anomalies in family
• Syndromic conditions in family members

Associated Features:

• Other digit involvement (suggests Type 3 syndromic)
• Other congenital anomalies (cardiac, skeletal, ocular)
• Developmental delays or medical conditions

Previous Treatment:

• Splinting attempts (type, duration, compliance, response)
• Therapy interventions
• Any surgical procedures

Physical Examination

Systematic examination should document:

Inspection:

• Which digits affected (unilateral vs bilateral, number of digits)
• Posture of affected digit(s) at rest
• DIP joint posture (compensatory hyperextension common)
• Skin condition (volar tightness, creases, scars from previous surgery)
• Associated anomalies (syndactyly, polydactyly, other)

Active Range of Motion:

• Active PIP extension (patient extends maximally)
• Active PIP flexion
• DIP and MCP joint motion
• Compare to contralateral hand

Passive Range of Motion:

• Gentle passive PIP extension (measure maximum correction)
• Document fixed versus correctable component
• Wrist position effect (test with wrist flexed and extended - FDS contribution)
• Note any joint crepitus or instability

Special Tests:

• FDS test: Isolate FDS function by blocking other fingers in extension
• Tenodesis effect: Wrist extension should extend fingers if tendon balance normal
• Skin assessment: Assess volar skin mobility and length
• Volar palpation: Palpate for thickened volar plate, tight bands, accessory structures

Measurement and Documentation:

• PIP flexion contracture angle (active and passive)
• Measure with goniometer and document precisely
• Photograph from lateral and dorsal views
• Compare to previous measurements if available

Syndromic Screening (if multiple digits or bilateral severe):

• Height, weight, body habitus (Marfan: tall, arachnodactyly)
• Facial features (Down syndrome characteristics)
• Dental examination (oculodentodigital syndrome)
• Thumb hypoplasia (Fanconi anemia)
• Other skeletal abnormalities
• Cardiac auscultation (Marfan: murmur)
• Ophthalmologic screening (lens dislocation in Marfan)

Surgical Complications

Complication Management:

Recurrence:

• Most common complication (30-50% of surgical cases)
• Often occurs during growth spurt in adolescents
• Prevention: prolonged splinting, optimal surgical technique, skeletal maturity before surgery
• Management: resume splinting program, consider revision surgery only if severe

Neurovascular Injury:

• Digital nerve injury during dissection (most at risk during volar plate release)
• Prevention: loupe magnification, careful identification of neurovascular bundles, gentle dissection
• Management: primary repair if identified intraoperatively, neuroma excision if late symptomatic

Wound Breakdown/Skin Necrosis:

• Due to inadequate skin lengthening or release
• Prevention: liberal use of Z-plasty or skin graft, avoid tension
• Management: local wound care, allow secondary healing, delayed skin grafting if needed

Stiffness:

• Loss of PIP flexion (most common) or inability to achieve full extension
• Prevention: early motion (2 weeks post-op), hand therapy, balance release with stability
• Management: aggressive therapy, dynamic splinting, rarely surgery

Swan-Neck Deformity:

• PIP hyperextension with DIP flexion from over-release of volar structures
• Prevention: do not over-release, preserve volar plate if possible, assess intraoperatively
• Management: splinting, therapy, DIP fusion or flexor tenodesis if severe

Conservative Treatment Complications

Skin Breakdown:

• From excessive pressure or prolonged splint wear
• Prevention: proper padding, skin checks, avoid excessive force
• Management: splint holiday, skin care, resume when healed

Worsening Contracture Despite Treatment:

• Indicates failure of conservative treatment
• Consider surgical intervention if meets criteria

Noncompliance:

• Leading cause of conservative treatment failure
• Address with education, simplified regimen, frequent follow-up

Immediate Post-Operative Period (0-2 Weeks)

Dressing and Splinting:

• Bulky hand dressing with dorsal extension splint
• PIP in full extension, DIP and MCP free
• Elevation above heart level for 48 hours
• Ice packs intermittently for swelling

Wound Care:

• First dressing change at 3-5 days
• Assess for hematoma, excessive swelling, circulation
• Check skin viability (especially if graft performed)
• Suture removal at 10-14 days (earlier if skin graft - 5-7 days)

Pain Management:

• Oral analgesia (acetaminophen, NSAIDs)
• Typically minimal pain after first few days
• Avoid narcotics beyond first 48 hours if possible

Early Rehabilitation Phase (2-6 Weeks)

Splinting:

• Remove dressing at 2 weeks, begin removable dorsal extension splint
• Splint off for therapy and hygiene only
• Night splinting in full extension continues

Therapy Initiation:

• Begin gentle active PIP flexion and extension exercises
• Passive extension to maintain correction
• Scar massage (after sutures out)
• Edema control (compression, elevation, retrograde massage)
• DIP and MCP active motion

Activity:

• Light activities of daily living
• No forceful gripping or heavy lifting
• Protect hand from trauma

Intermediate Phase (6 Weeks - 3 Months)

Splinting:

• Gradual weaning from day splinting
• Continue night splinting (critical for preventing recurrence)
• Use during activities that tend to cause flexion posture

Therapy Progression:

• Progressive resistive exercises for flexion and extension
• Scar remodeling and desensitization
• Functional activities and ADL training
• Splint adjustments as needed

Monitoring:

• Monthly clinic visits with measurements
• Photograph documentation
• Radiographs at 6 weeks to assess joint

Late Phase (3-12 Months)

Splinting:

• Night splinting continued for minimum 6 months, often 12 months
• Critical for preventing recurrence, especially in adolescents
• Gradual weaning only if maintaining full extension

Therapy:

• Functional strengthening
• Return to full activities
• Scar management continued

Long-Term Follow-Up:

• 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and annual visits
• Monitor for recurrence (most common in first year)
• Reinforce importance of splinting compliance
• Intervene early if recurrence developing

Return to Activities:

• Light activities: 6 weeks
• Sports: 3 months
• Full unrestricted: 3-6 months

Prolonged post-operative splinting is as important as the surgery itself for preventing the high recurrence rate.

Conservative Treatment Outcomes

Overall Success Rate: 50-70%

Factors Associated with Better Outcomes:

• Early initiation of treatment (especially Type 1 infantile)
• Mild to moderate contractures (less than 45 degrees at presentation)
• Good passive correction at baseline
• Excellent compliance with splinting and stretching program
• No radiographic joint changes
• Younger age at initiation (Type 1 vs Type 2)

Expected Outcomes by Severity:

• Mild (less than 30 degrees): 70-80% improve or stabilize
• Moderate (30-60 degrees): 50-60% improve or stabilize
• Severe (over 60 degrees): 30-40% improve, but often prevents further progression

Time to Improvement:

• Most improvement seen in first 6 months of treatment
• Continued treatment for 12-24 months if showing progress
• Plateau by 12-18 months typically

Surgical Treatment Outcomes

Overall Satisfactory Outcomes: 60-70% Recurrence Rate: 30-50%

Factors Associated with Better Surgical Outcomes:

• Good passive correction pre-operatively
• No severe joint remodeling on radiographs
• Single anatomical cause identified and addressed
• Skeletal maturity (less recurrence risk)
• Excellent post-operative compliance with therapy and splinting
• Adequate surgical release of all contributing structures

Factors Associated with Poor Surgical Outcomes:

• Severe fixed contractures (over 75 degrees)
• Marked condylar flattening and joint changes
• Multiple anatomical abnormalities
• Active skeletal growth (adolescent)
• Poor compliance with post-operative splinting
• Type 3 (syndromic) camptodactyly

Recurrence:

• Most common complication
• Typically occurs within first year post-operatively
• Higher rate in adolescents during growth spurt
• May be partial (improved but not corrected) or complete
• Revision surgery has even higher recurrence rate

Functional Outcomes:

• 60-70% achieve satisfactory function and appearance
• 20-30% unchanged or minimally improved
• 5-10% worse than pre-operative state (stiffness, loss of flexion)

Patient Satisfaction:

• Correlated more with realistic pre-operative expectations than degree of correction
• Cosmetic improvement important to many patients
• Functional improvement variable

Long-Term Prognosis

Natural History (Untreated):

• Type 1 (Infantile): 30-40% improve spontaneously, most stabilize
• Type 2 (Adolescent): Progressive during growth, stabilizes at maturity
• Type 3 (Syndromic): Depends on underlying condition

Treated Cases:

• Most mild cases do well with conservative treatment alone
• Moderate cases often require prolonged conservative treatment
• Severe cases may need surgery but outcomes unpredictable
• Recurrence after surgery common but often less severe than original

Quality of Life Impact:

• Mild cases: minimal impact on function or quality of life
• Moderate cases: some activity limitations, compensatory strategies effective
• Severe cases: significant functional limitations, psychosocial impact

Arthritis Risk:

• Long-term arthritis uncommon even in severe untreated cases
• Joint remodeling occurs but typically not symptomatic degenerative change
• Post-surgical stiffness more common than arthritis

Overall, camptodactyly has a variable prognosis depending on severity, type, and treatment response. Conservative treatment is effective for most mild to moderate cases. Surgery reserved for severe cases has unpredictable outcomes with high recurrence.

Australian Practice Considerations

Camptodactyly is managed in Australian practice with emphasis on conservative treatment as first-line therapy, consistent with international best practice guidelines. The multidisciplinary approach involving hand surgeons, hand therapists, and occupational therapists is standard across major pediatric and hand surgery centers.

Conservative Management:

• Hand therapy services widely available through public and private sectors
• Custom splint fabrication by certified hand therapists or orthotists
• PBS subsidy available for some splinting materials through occupational therapy prescriptions
• Early intervention programs include hand therapy for congenital anomalies

Surgical Services:

• Pediatric hand surgery available at major tertiary children's hospitals
• Adult hand surgery services at major teaching hospitals and private practices
• Multidisciplinary hand clinics common in metropolitan areas
• Regional patients may need metropolitan referral for complex cases

Patient Education:

• Emphasis on realistic expectations regarding treatment duration and outcomes
• Strong focus on compliance with splinting programs
• Parent education resources available through hand therapy departments
• Support groups for congenital hand differences available in some states

Evidence-Based Practice:

• Australian practice follows international evidence emphasizing conservative-first approach
• Recognition of 50-70% success rate with adequate conservative treatment
• Appropriate caution regarding surgical intervention given high recurrence rates
• Shared decision-making model incorporating patient/family preferences

Access Considerations:

• Public hospital hand clinics provide access regardless of ability to pay
• Private hand surgery services available with variable out-of-pocket costs
• Hand therapy often requires private payment or minimal public access in some regions
• Telehealth consultations increasingly used for regional patient follow-up

The conservative-first approach aligns with evidence that the majority of cases respond to splinting and stretching, avoiding surgery with its unpredictable outcomes and 30-50% recurrence rate. Surgical services remain available through specialized hand surgery units for refractory cases meeting strict criteria.