Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Comprehensive guide to cubital tunnel syndrome including McGowan grading, Froment's and Wartenberg's signs, and surgical treatment options.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Second Most Common Entrapment Neuropathy | Ulnar Nerve | Elbow

2ndMost common entrapment
80-90%Surgical success rate
Small + RingFingers affected (ulnar)
McGowanGrading system

McGowan Grading

Grade I
PatternMild - Paresthesias only, normal exam
TreatmentConservative management
Grade II
PatternModerate - Weakness present
TreatmentConsider surgery
Grade III
PatternSevere - Intrinsic atrophy
TreatmentSurgical decompression

Critical Must-Knows

  • Ulnar Nerve Territory: Small finger and ulnar half of ring finger (palmar and dorsal)
  • Froment's Sign: Thumb IP flexion when pinching - indicates adductor pollicis weakness
  • Wartenberg's Sign: Small finger abduction at rest - indicates weak 3rd palmar interosseous
  • Claw Hand: Ring and small finger hyperextension at MCP with IP flexion (ulnar paradox)
  • Surgery Options: In-situ decompression vs anterior transposition - similar outcomes

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Froment's positive = motor involvement = Grade II+
  • "
    Intrinsic atrophy = urgent surgery, incomplete recovery
  • "
    Elbow flexion test reproduces symptoms
  • "
    Ulnar claw is WORSE with LOW lesion (ulnar paradox)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

A 64-year-old male patient with cubital tunnel syndrome.A. The elbow anteroposterior view shows severe osteoarthritis in the elbow joint. Note multiple spur changes and loose bodies in the medial side
Click to expand
A 64-year-old male patient with cubital tunnel syndrome.A. The elbow anteroposterior view shows severe osteoarthritis in the elbow joint. Note multiplCredit: Choi SJ et al. via Ultrasonography via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
A 17-year-old patient suffered right cubital tunnel syndrome. MR arthrogram of the elbow was performed to evaluate for loose body. Axial T2-weighted with fat-saturated (a, b) images reveal swollen and
Click to expand
A 17-year-old patient suffered right cubital tunnel syndrome. MR arthrogram of the elbow was performed to evaluate for loose body. Axial T2-weighted wCredit: Dong Q et al. via Radiol Res Pract via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
With the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, an 8 to 10 cm curved skin incision above and below the elbow is made posterior to the medial epicondyl.
Click to expand
With the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, an 8 to 10 cm curved skin incision above and below the elbow is made posterior to the medial epicondyl.Credit: Gousheh J et al. via World J Plast Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
The ulnar nerve is released proximal and distal to the elbow.
Click to expand
The ulnar nerve is released proximal and distal to the elbow.Credit: Gousheh J et al. via World J Plast Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Cubital Tunnel Exam Points

Froment's Sign

Thumb IP flexion when pinching paper. Indicates adductor pollicis weakness (ulnar nerve). Uses FPL (median) to compensate.

Wartenberg's Sign

Small finger abducted at rest. Weak 3rd palmar interosseous cannot adduct small finger. "Catching on pocket" complaint.

Ulnar Paradox

Claw WORSE in low lesion. High lesion: FDP paralyzed so less IP flexion. Low lesion: FDP works so more clawing.

Motor Recovery

May be incomplete if atrophy. Intrinsic muscle recovery depends on duration. Sensory recovers better than motor.

Quick Decision Guide

PresentationMcGowan GradeTreatmentKey Pearl
Intermittent numbness only, normal examGrade IConservative: splint, activity modificationTrial for 3 months before surgery
Weakness on exam, positive Froment'sGrade IIConsider surgery if fails conservativeMotor involvement = surgical indication
Intrinsic atrophy, claw handGrade IIIUrgent surgical decompressionMotor recovery may be incomplete
Mnemonic

FWCUlnar Nerve Motor Signs

F
Froment's
Thumb IP flexion when pinching
W
Wartenberg's
Small finger abducted at rest
C
Claw
Ring and small finger clawing

Memory Hook:FWC = Froment's, Wartenberg's, Claw - the three motor signs of ulnar palsy, in order of severity!

Mnemonic

HALF PADUlnar Nerve Hand Muscles

H
Hypothenar
ADM, ODM, FDM
A
Adductor pollicis
Thumb adduction
L
Lumbricals 3,4
Ulnar two lumbricals
F
First dorsal interosseous
Index abduction
P
Palmar interossei
Finger adduction
A
All dorsal interossei
Finger abduction
D
Deep head FPB
One head of FPB

Memory Hook:HALF of the hand is paralyzed by ulnar nerve injury - remember HALF PAD!

Mnemonic

FOAMCubital Tunnel Compression Sites

F
Flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis
Osborne's ligament
O
Olecranon-epicondyle passage
Retrocondylar groove
A
Arcade of Struthers
5-10cm proximal to epicondyle
M
Medial intermuscular septum
At medial arm

Memory Hook:FOAM - Four sites of potential compression from distal to proximal!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why Cubital Tunnel Matters

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common peripheral nerve compression after CTS. Understanding ulnar nerve anatomy, McGowan grading, and surgical options is essential for the exam.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome is compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow as it passes between the medial epicondyle and olecranon.

Demographics

  • Male predominance: 2:1 ratio
  • Peak age: 30-50 years
  • Bilateral: 30% of cases
  • Occupational risk: Repetitive elbow flexion, leaning on elbows

Understanding risk factors helps identify at-risk patients.

Causes

  • Idiopathic: Most common
  • Repetitive flexion: Occupational, sleeping with bent elbow
  • Direct pressure: Leaning on elbows
  • Cubitus valgus: Tardy ulnar palsy post-fracture
  • Osteophytes: Elbow arthritis

Screen for underlying causes in all patients.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Cubital Tunnel Anatomy

The cubital tunnel is a fibro-osseous tunnel at the elbow. FLOOR is the MCL and elbow capsule. ROOF is Osborne's ligament (arcuate ligament connecting the two heads of FCU). The ulnar nerve becomes superficial and vulnerable here.

Anatomical Relationships:

  • Proximal: Arcade of Struthers (5-10cm above epicondyle)
  • At Tunnel: Between medial epicondyle and olecranon
  • Distal: Between two heads of FCU (Osborne's ligament)

Dynamic Factors:

  1. Elbow flexion: Nerve stretches 4-8mm, tunnel narrows 55%
  2. Nerve excursion: 10mm with full flexion
  3. Pressure: Increases 6x from extension to flexion
Vascular anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow
Click to expand
Three-panel cadaveric study demonstrating the vascular supply to the ulnar nerve at the elbow - critical knowledge for surgical decompression. Panel A: Cadaveric dissection with red latex-injected arteries showing the ulnar nerve and its blood supply (numbered structures 1-5). Panel B: Isolated specimen showing the harvested neurovascular structures. Panel C: Microangiogram demonstrating the intraneural vascular network. Understanding this blood supply is essential to preserve nerve perfusion during anterior transposition.Credit: Li MX et al., Neural Regen Res - CC BY 4.0

Classification Systems

McGowan Classification (Modified)

GradeSymptomsExaminationTreatment
IIntermittent paresthesiasNormal strength and sensationConservative
IIAIntermittent paresthesiasWeakness without atrophySurgery if fails conservative
IIBPersistent paresthesiasWeakness without atrophySurgery recommended
IIIPersistent symptomsIntrinsic atrophyUrgent surgery

McGowan grading guides treatment decisions.

Dellon Classification

GradeSensoryMotorTwo-Point
MildIntermittentNormalNormal
ModerateConstantMeasurable weaknessGreater than 6mm
SevereAbnormalAtrophyGreater than 10mm

Dellon provides more granular severity assessment.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Numbness: Small and ulnar ring finger
  • Timing: Worse at night, with elbow flexion
  • Dropping objects: Weakness of grip
  • Phone sign: Numbness holding phone to ear
  • Red flags: Rapid progression, severe weakness

Ask about occupation and sleeping position.

Examination

  • Tinel's: Over cubital tunnel
  • Elbow flexion test: 60 seconds sustained flexion
  • Froment's sign: IP flexion when pinching
  • Wartenberg's sign: Small finger abduction
  • Two-point discrimination: Greater than 6mm abnormal

Always compare to contralateral side.

Key Clinical Signs

SignTechniquePositive FindingIndicates
Froment'sPinch paper between thumb and indexIP flexion of thumbAdductor pollicis weakness
Wartenberg'sObserve hand at restSmall finger abducted3rd palmar interosseous weakness
Elbow FlexionSustained elbow flexion 60 secondsParesthesias reproducedUlnar nerve compression
Scratch CollapseResist shoulder external rotation while scratching nerveMomentary weaknessNerve irritability

Differential Diagnosis

Consider: C8/T1 radiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, Guyon's canal compression (ulnar tunnel), pancoast tumor. Check for double crush syndrome.

Investigations

Investigation Protocol

ClinicalFirst Line

Clinical diagnosis in typical presentations with positive Tinel's, elbow flexion test, and motor signs.

ConfirmatoryNerve Conduction Studies

Gold standard. Slowing of motor conduction velocity across elbow (less than 50 m/s). Compare to segment above and below.

SupplementaryEMG

For severity grading. Denervation potentials in intrinsics (FDI, ADM). Fibrillations indicate axonal loss.

ImagingX-ray/MRI

X-ray: Cubitus valgus, osteophytes, prior fracture. MRI: Subluxation, mass lesion, nerve changes.

Multimodal Assessment Example

Multimodal imaging assessment of cubital tunnel syndrome
Click to expand
Five-panel multimodal assessment of cubital tunnel syndrome in a 64-year-old male. Panel A: AP elbow X-ray showing severe osteoarthritis with prominent osteophytes contributing to nerve compression. Panels B-C: Transverse ultrasound showing enlarged ulnar nerve (arrows) with cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of 0.302 cm² (normal less than 0.10 cm²). Panel D: Ultrasound demonstrating nerve-to-bone distance (0.350 cm). Panel E: Intraoperative photograph confirming ulnar nerve compression (arrows) requiring decompression. This case demonstrates the complete diagnostic workup from clinical suspicion to surgical confirmation.Credit: Choi SJ et al., Ultrasonography - CC BY 4.0

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
cubital tunnel syndrome management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for cubital tunnel syndromeCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management

Conservative Treatment Steps

First LineActivity Modification

Avoid prolonged elbow flexion. Ergonomic workplace assessment. Avoid leaning on elbows.

NightElbow Extension Splint

Keep elbow extended at night. Towel wrap or commercial splint. Prevents nocturnal flexion.

ProtectionElbow Pad

Protect nerve from direct pressure. Wear during day if occupational exposure.

Conservative treatment is appropriate for McGowan Grade I with intermittent symptoms only.

Surgical Indications

Absolute:

  • Intrinsic muscle atrophy (McGowan III)
  • Failed adequate conservative trial (3 months)
  • Progressive weakness

Relative:

  • McGowan Grade II with motor involvement
  • Recurrent subluxation of nerve
  • Occupational requirements

Do not delay surgery if motor involvement is present.

Surgical Technique

In-Situ Decompression

Surgical Steps

1Positioning

Supine, arm on table. Elbow flexed 20-30 degrees. Tourniquet optional.

2Incision

Curved incision between medial epicondyle and olecranon. 6-8cm. Protect medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve.

3Dissection

Identify and protect nerve. Release Osborne's ligament (FCU aponeurosis). Release distally between FCU heads.

4Proximal Release

Release arcade of Struthers if tight. Release medial intermuscular septum.

5Closure

Layered closure. Check nerve excursion. No drain required.

In-situ decompression is technically simpler with lower complication rate.

Intraoperative photograph of cubital tunnel decompression
Click to expand
Intraoperative photograph demonstrating ulnar nerve decompression technique. The surgical exposure shows release of the intermuscular septum between triceps and brachialis muscles. Retractors maintain the wound edges while the surgeon releases the fibrous tissue overlying the nerve. The yellow iodine-stained skin indicates proper sterile preparation. This key surgical step provides proximal decompression of the ulnar nerve at the arcade of Struthers level.Credit: Gousheh J et al., World J Plast Surg - CC BY 4.0

Anterior Transposition

Types:

  • Subcutaneous: Superficial to flexor-pronator mass
  • Intramuscular: Within flexor-pronator mass
  • Submuscular: Deep to elevated flexor-pronator origin

Indications:

  • Subluxating nerve
  • Failed in-situ decompression
  • Cubitus valgus (tardy ulnar palsy)
  • Revision surgery

Transposition adds complexity but addresses subluxation.

Structures at Risk

StructureLocationConsequence if Injured
Medial antebrachial cutaneousCrosses field superficiallyPainful neuroma, numbness forearm
Ulnar nerve branchesMotor to FCU at/below tunnelWeakness of wrist flexion
MCLDeep to nerveElbow instability if damaged

Protect MABC nerve to avoid painful post-op neuroma.

Complications

Complications of Cubital Tunnel Surgery

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
MABC neuroma5-10%Careful dissection, neurolysis if symptomatic
Recurrence5-15%Revision with transposition
Elbow instabilityRareAvoid MCL injury, repair if damaged
Wound complications2-5%Standard wound care
Incomplete recovery10-20%Counsel pre-operatively especially if atrophy

MABC nerve injury causing painful neuroma is the most common complication. Careful handling and protection during dissection is essential.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Day 0-7Initial Phase

Soft dressing, sling optional. Elevate arm. Finger ROM immediately. Wound check at 1 week.

Week 2Suture Removal

Remove sutures. Begin gentle elbow ROM. Avoid resisted flexion.

Week 4-6Rehabilitation

Progressive strengthening. Full ROM by 4 weeks. Grip strengthening from week 6.

Month 3-6Recovery Assessment

Assess nerve recovery. Sensory improvement first. Motor recovery may take 6-12 months.

Return to work: Desk work 1-2 weeks. Manual work 6-8 weeks.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Success Rates:

  • In-situ decompression: 80-90% good/excellent
  • Anterior transposition: 80-90% good/excellent
  • Comparison: No significant difference in outcomes

Prognostic Factors:

FactorBetter OutcomeWorse Outcome
McGowan GradeI-IIIII with atrophy
DurationShort (under 6 months)Long (over 1 year)
AgeYoungerElderly
AtrophyAbsentPresent

Motor recovery is often incomplete if intrinsic atrophy is present pre-operatively.

Evidence Base

Systematic Review
📚 Caliandro et al
Key Findings:
  • Simple decompression vs transposition
  • No significant difference in outcomes
  • Transposition may have more complications
  • Simple decompression preferred as first-line
Clinical Implication: In-situ decompression is adequate for most cases.
Source: Cochrane 2016

Systematic Review
📚 Zlowodzki et al
Key Findings:
  • Anterior transposition vs simple decompression
  • Similar efficacy
  • Transposition has higher complication rate
  • Simple decompression recommended initially
Clinical Implication: Reserve transposition for failed decompression or nerve subluxation.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007

Systematic Review
📚 Mowlavi et al
Key Findings:
  • Submuscular transposition outcomes
  • 85% good/excellent results
  • Longer recovery than subcutaneous
  • Consider for high-demand patients
Clinical Implication: Submuscular transposition provides durable results.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2000

RCT
📚 Bartels et al
Key Findings:
  • Simple decompression vs transposition
  • 152 patients randomized
  • Similar outcomes at 1 year
  • Simpler procedure preferred
Clinical Implication: Level I evidence supports simple decompression.
Source: Neurosurgery 2005

RCT
📚 Gervasio et al
Key Findings:
  • Endoscopic vs open decompression
  • Similar outcomes
  • Faster recovery with endoscopic
  • Learning curve required
Clinical Implication: Endoscopic release is a valid alternative.
Source: Neurosurgery 2005

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classic Presentation

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old office worker presents with 6 months of numbness in the small finger. He leans on his elbows at his desk. Tinel's is positive over the elbow. Froment's is negative."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a classic presentation of cubital tunnel syndrome - ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. The history of leaning on elbows is a typical cause. Negative Froment's indicates no significant motor involvement, suggesting McGowan Grade I. My initial management would be conservative: activity modification (avoid leaning on elbows), night splinting to keep the elbow extended, and ergonomic workplace assessment. I would give this a 3-month trial. If symptoms persist or motor involvement develops, I would obtain nerve conduction studies and consider surgical decompression.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize classic occupational history
Froment's negative = no motor involvement = Grade I
Conservative trial for 3 months first
NCS to confirm if considering surgery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Jumping to surgery without conservative trial
✗Missing that Froment's negative means better prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is Wartenberg's sign?"
"What surgical options are available?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Motor Involvement

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old man has 12 months of small finger numbness and now notices weakness holding a key. On examination, Froment's sign is positive and there is early wasting of the first dorsal interosseous."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is cubital tunnel syndrome with motor involvement - positive Froment's indicates adductor pollicis weakness and FDI wasting confirms intrinsic denervation. This is McGowan Grade IIB to III. Given the motor involvement and 12-month duration, I would not recommend further conservative treatment. I would obtain NCS to confirm and grade severity. I would recommend surgical decompression - either in-situ if the nerve is stable, or anterior transposition if there is nerve subluxation. I would counsel the patient that motor recovery may be incomplete given the duration and presence of atrophy. Sensory recovery is expected but full intrinsic strength may not return.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Froment's positive = motor involvement = surgical indication
FDI wasting = McGowan III = urgent surgery
Counsel about incomplete motor recovery
12-month duration is negative prognostic factor
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending further conservative treatment with atrophy
✗Promising complete motor recovery
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the ulnar paradox?"
"What would you do if the nerve subluxates?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Failed Surgery

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 6 months after in-situ decompression with persistent symptoms and now has subluxation of the ulnar nerve with elbow flexion. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a failed cubital tunnel release with nerve subluxation. The subluxation was either missed pre-operatively or developed after release of stabilizing tissues. I would first confirm the diagnosis with repeat NCS comparing to pre-operative and post-operative studies. For revision surgery with documented subluxation, I would perform anterior transposition - likely submuscular for the best soft tissue coverage and to prevent re-subluxation. I would counsel about lower success rates in revision surgery (60-70%) and the risk of MABC nerve injury. At surgery, I would carefully identify and protect the MABC nerve, release all compression sites including the arcade of Struthers and medial intermuscular septum, and transpose the nerve anteriorly into a submuscular pocket.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Subluxation indicates need for transposition at revision
Repeat NCS before revision
Submuscular transposition for revision cases
Counsel about lower success rates in revision
COMMON TRAPS
✗Repeating in-situ decompression with subluxation
✗Not addressing all compression sites
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the types of anterior transposition?"
"How do you protect the MABC nerve?"

MCQ Practice Points

Ulnar Nerve Territory

Q: Which fingers are affected in ulnar nerve compression? A: Small finger and ulnar half of ring finger - both palmar AND dorsal surfaces (unlike CTS which is palmar only).

Froment's Sign Muscle

Q: Which muscle is tested by Froment's sign? A: Adductor pollicis - the only muscle that adducts the thumb (except for first interosseous to lesser extent). Innervated by ulnar nerve.

Ulnar Paradox

Q: Why is clawing worse in a LOW ulnar nerve lesion? A: FDP function preserved. In high lesion, FDP to ring/small is paralyzed so IP flexion is weak. In low lesion, FDP works normally, causing pronounced IP flexion with MCP hyperextension.

Decompression vs Transposition

Q: What does the evidence show regarding in-situ decompression vs anterior transposition? A: Similar outcomes. Cochrane review (Caliandro 2016) shows no significant difference. Simple decompression has lower complication rate. Reserve transposition for subluxation or revision.

Arcade of Struthers

Q: What is the Arcade of Struthers and why is it important? A: Musculofascial band 5-10cm proximal to medial epicondyle. Potential compression site that must be released during decompression to prevent recurrence.

Osborne's Ligament

Q: What is Osborne's ligament? A: The arcuate ligament connecting the two heads of FCU. Forms the roof of the cubital tunnel. Release is essential during decompression.

Australian Context

Australian Guidelines:

  • RANZCR recommends NCS for confirmation before surgical intervention
  • Medicare rebates available for NCS and surgical decompression/transposition
  • Most cubital tunnel surgery performed as day surgery

Medicolegal Considerations:

  • Document motor examination (Froment's, Wartenberg's) at each visit
  • Obtain informed consent including risk of incomplete motor recovery
  • Document pre-operative intrinsic wasting - patients must understand this may not fully recover
  • Warn of MABC nerve injury, wound complications, recurrence

Workcover/Insurance:

  • May be work-related (occupational pressure, repetitive flexion)
  • Document occupational history thoroughly
  • Workplace ergonomic assessment may be required

Australian surgeons should follow RACS guidelines and document consent thoroughly.

CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Ulnar nerve between medial epicondyle and olecranon
  • •Osborne's ligament = FCU aponeurosis (roof)
  • •Arcade of Struthers 5-10cm proximal
  • •MABC nerve at risk superficially

Clinical Signs

  • •Froment's = thumb IP flexion when pinching
  • •Wartenberg's = small finger abducted
  • •Claw hand = MCP hyperextension + IP flexion
  • •Ulnar paradox = worse claw in LOW lesion

Classification

  • •McGowan I = sensory only = conservative
  • •McGowan II = weakness = consider surgery
  • •McGowan III = atrophy = urgent surgery
  • •Modified IIA/IIB distinguishes intermittent vs persistent

Surgery Options

  • •In-situ decompression = first line
  • •Anterior transposition = subluxation/revision
  • •Submuscular = high demand/revision
  • •All have 80-90% success

Complications

  • •MABC neuroma = most common
  • •Recurrence 5-15%
  • •Incomplete motor recovery if atrophy
  • •Elbow instability if MCL injured
Quick Stats
Reading Time65 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand