Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Distraction Osteogenesis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Distraction Osteogenesis

Principles and biology of bone lengthening through gradual distraction and the tension-stress effect

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

Tension-Stress Effect | Ilizarov Principles | Bone Regeneration | Limb Lengthening

1mm/dayoptimal distraction rate
0.25mmper distraction (4x daily)
5-7 dayslatency period before distraction
3:1consolidation:distraction time ratio

Phases of Distraction Osteogenesis

Latency
Pattern5-7 days post-corticotomy
TreatmentAllow hematoma formation
Distraction
Pattern1mm/day gradual lengthening
TreatmentBone regeneration
Consolidation
Pattern3x distraction time
TreatmentMineralization
Remodeling
PatternMonths to years
TreatmentCortical maturation

Critical Must-Knows

  • Tension-stress law: gradual traction stimulates bone and soft tissue regeneration
  • Corticotomy preserves endosteal blood supply (unlike osteotomy)
  • Optimal rate is 1mm/day in 4 increments (0.25mm each)
  • Consolidation index: 30-45 days per cm lengthened
  • Premature removal causes deformity; delayed removal wastes time

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Ilizarov developed technique observing dogs with fractures in traction
  • "
    Too fast distraction: non-union; too slow: premature consolidation
  • "
    Acute nerve stretch tolerated better than gradual (adaptation)
  • "
    Blood flow increases 2-3x during distraction phase

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis for tibial bone defect - clinical and serial X-ray progression
Click to expand
Distraction osteogenesis using Ilizarov circular external fixator for tibial segmental defect. (a) Clinical photograph showing Ilizarov frame applied to the tibia. (b-j) Serial AP and lateral radiographs demonstrating progressive bone transport and regenerate bone formation over the treatment course, from initial defect through consolidation and frame removal.Credit: PMC5258734 - CC BY 4.0
Ilizarov treatment of infected tibial nonunion with gap defect
Click to expand
Treatment of infected tibial nonunion with gap defect using Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis. (a) Pre-operative AP and lateral radiographs showing infected gap nonunion of the tibial shaft. (b) Ilizarov circular fixator applied with proximal tibial corticotomy for compression-distraction treatment. (c) Post-treatment radiographs demonstrating healed tibia with consolidated regenerate bone filling the original defect.Credit: Sahu RL et al., Niger Med J - CC BY 4.0
Ilizarov circular external fixator on lower leg
Click to expand
Clinical photograph demonstrating an Ilizarov circular external fixator applied to the lower leg for distraction osteogenesis. The apparatus consists of multiple circular rings (gold/brass and carbon fiber rings visible) connected by threaded rods with transfixation wires passing through the limb. Pin site care dressings are visible at wire entry points. The design allows controlled gradual distraction at 1mm per day to stimulate bone regeneration.Credit: Viapastrengo via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Ilizarov external fixator alternate view
Click to expand
Alternate view of an Ilizarov circular external fixator during limb lengthening. The frame demonstrates the characteristic ring-and-rod construction that enables gradual bone distraction. Multiple circular rings are interconnected by threaded rods, allowing precise adjustment of the distraction rate and direction. Tensioned wires transfixing the bone segments provide stable fixation during the lengthening process.Credit: Viapastrengo via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Critical Distraction Osteogenesis Exam Points

Tension-Stress Law

Gradual controlled traction stimulates regeneration of bone, soft tissues, nerves, and vessels. Applies tension-stress effect: tension creates biological stimulus for tissue genesis.

Corticotomy Technique

Preserve endosteal blood supply via corticotomy (perforations) not osteotomy (complete cut). Medullary blood flow critical for regenerate bone formation.

Rate and Rhythm

1mm per day in 4 increments (0.25mm each). Too fast causes fibrous non-union; too slow causes premature consolidation. Frequency matters as much as rate.

Consolidation Index

30-45 days per cm lengthened for consolidation. Premature frame removal risks fracture through regenerate; delayed removal unnecessary and impacts patient.

At a Glance

Distraction osteogenesis is based on Ilizarov's tension-stress law: gradual controlled traction stimulates regeneration of bone, soft tissues, nerves, and vessels. The process follows four phases: latency (5-7 days post-corticotomy allowing hematoma formation), distraction (lengthening at 1mm/day in 4 increments of 0.25mm), consolidation (30-45 days per cm lengthened, approximately 3× distraction time), and remodeling. A corticotomy (multiple perforations) preserves the endosteal blood supply unlike a complete osteotomy. Critical principle: rate and rhythm matter—too fast causes fibrous non-union, too slow causes premature consolidation. Blood flow increases 2-3× during distraction. The technique enables limb lengthening, deformity correction, bone transport, and nonunion treatment.

Mnemonic

LDCRFour Phases of Distraction Osteogenesis

L
Latency
5-7 days - hematoma forms, inflammation begins
D
Distraction
1mm/day - bone regenerate forms in gap
C
Consolidation
3x distraction time - mineralization occurs
R
Remodeling
Months-years - cortical maturation continues

Memory Hook:Like Drawing out taffy - Latency lets it set, Distraction pulls it apart, Consolidation hardens it, Remodeling perfects it!

Mnemonic

STABLESPrinciples of Distraction Osteogenesis (Ilizarov)

S
Stable fixation
Rigid external frame prevents shear at distraction gap
T
Tension stress
Gradual controlled traction stimulates regeneration
A
Adequate blood supply
Preserve endosteal vessels via corticotomy
B
Biological respect
Low-energy surgical technique
L
Latency period
5-7 days before starting distraction
E
Exact rate and rhythm
1mm/day in 4 increments of 0.25mm
S
Sufficient consolidation
30-45 days per cm before frame removal

Memory Hook:STABLES - Like a horse in a stable, the bone needs stability and careful nurturing to grow!

Overview and Biological Principles

Distraction osteogenesis is a surgical technique that induces new bone formation between bone segments that are gradually separated by controlled traction. Gavriil Ilizarov developed the modern technique in Russia in the 1950s, establishing the biological law of tension-stress.

The tension-stress law states that gradual, controlled traction on living tissues creates mechanical stress that stimulates and maintains regeneration and active growth of certain tissues. This applies not only to bone but also to soft tissues including muscle, tendon, nerve, and blood vessels.

Historical Context

Ilizarov observed that dogs with fractures treated in traction (distracted) healed with callus formation, while those compressed did not. This led him to systematically study controlled distraction, developing principles now used worldwide for limb lengthening and deformity correction.

Indications

  • Limb length discrepancy (greater than 2-3 cm)
  • Congenital deficiencies (fibular hemimelia, PFFD)
  • Post-traumatic shortening
  • Bone defects after debridement
  • Stature lengthening (controversial)

Advantages Over Other Methods

  • No bone graft required
  • No donor site morbidity
  • Soft tissue adaptation occurs simultaneously
  • Deformity correction possible during lengthening
  • Weight-bearing often possible during treatment

Mechanisms and Biology

The Tension-Stress Effect

The tension-stress law describes how mechanical forces regulate tissue growth and regeneration. Gradual tension stimulates cellular proliferation, matrix synthesis, and differentiation in multiple tissue types.

Cellular Responses:

  • Osteoblast proliferation: Increased in distraction gap
  • Angiogenesis: Vessel formation parallels bone columns
  • Stem cell recruitment: MSCs migrate to regenerate zone
  • Growth factor release: VEGF, BMPs, FGFs upregulated
Tissue TypeResponse to Gradual TensionClinical Significance
BoneIntramembranous ossification along tension linesNew bone forms without cartilage intermediate
MuscleSarcomere addition, hyperplasiaMaintains strength during lengthening
NerveAxonal elongation 1-2mm/day toleratedGradual stretch better tolerated than acute
Blood vesselsAngiogenesis and vessel elongationBlood flow increases 2-3x

Corticotomy vs Osteotomy

The surgical technique for creating the bone division critically affects regeneration quality. Ilizarov emphasized the importance of preserving endosteal blood supply.

Corticotomy Technique:

  • Multiple drill holes through cortex
  • Thin osteotome to connect holes
  • Preserve medullary contents and endosteal vessels
  • Low-energy technique minimizes thermal necrosis

Why Corticotomy is Superior:

  • Endosteal blood supply intact (provides 70-80% of bone blood flow)
  • Medullary stem cells available for regeneration
  • Faster healing than traditional osteotomy
  • Less risk of delayed union or non-union

Technical Error

Using saw or high-speed burr creates heat necrosis and damages endosteal blood supply. This delays healing and risks poor-quality regenerate. Multiple drill holes with thin osteotome is the gold standard technique.

Clinical Application and Technique

Phase 1: Latency Period

Latency Phase (5-7 Days)

Operative DayDay 0: Surgery

Corticotomy performed using multiple drill holes connected with thin osteotome. Frame applied with wires or half-pins achieving rigid stability. Soft tissue closure.

Early LatencyDays 1-3: Inflammation

Hematoma formation in distraction gap. Inflammatory response recruits cells. Mesenchymal stem cells begin migration. Blood clot provides scaffold.

Late LatencyDays 4-7: Preparation

Fibrin network organizing. Early fibroblastic proliferation. Vascular buds forming. Tissue ready for distraction stimulus.

Optimal Duration:

  • Standard: 5-7 days
  • Younger children: 5 days (faster healing)
  • Older patients or smokers: 7-10 days
  • Revision/scarred bone: 10-14 days

Phase 2: Distraction Period

The distraction phase is when gradual lengthening occurs, stimulating bone regeneration through tension-stress effect.

Optimal Distraction Parameters

Standard Protocol:

  • Rate: 1 mm per day total
  • Rhythm: 4 increments of 0.25 mm each (every 6 hours)
  • Speed: Slow, controlled turns of frame

Why 1mm/day?

  • Faster: Fibrous tissue forms instead of bone (non-union)
  • Slower: Premature mineralization blocks lengthening
  • 1mm/day matches regeneration rate of bone columns

Why 4 Times Daily?

  • Frequency maintains biological stimulus
  • Prevents premature consolidation between distractions
  • Better quality regenerate than once-daily distraction
  • Reduces pain compared to single large increment

Rate Modification

When to modify rate:

  • Nerve traction symptoms: Slow to 0.75mm/day or pause 3-5 days
  • Poor regenerate on X-ray: Slow to 0.5mm/day
  • Premature consolidation: Increase to 1.5mm/day briefly
  • Children under 5: Can tolerate 1.5mm/day

Clinical and Radiographic Monitoring

Weekly Assessment:

  • Clinical: Pin sites, neurovascular status, pain level
  • Radiographic: Regenerate quality, bone column formation
  • Functional: Joint range of motion above and below

Regenerate Quality Grading:

  • Good: Parallel dense bone columns spanning gap
  • Fair: Bone columns present but less dense
  • Poor: Radiolucent gap or minimal bone formation

Warning Signs:

  • Absent bone formation after 2 weeks of distraction
  • Widening lucent gap (too fast)
  • Premature consolidation (too slow)
  • Progressive neurological symptoms

Adjustments must be made promptly based on radiographic appearance and clinical assessment.

Phase 3: Consolidation Period

After achieving desired length, the frame remains in place while regenerate bone mineralizes and gains strength.

Consolidation Phase

Weeks 1-4Early Consolidation

Woven bone continues forming. Mineralization begins at margins and progresses centrally. Regenerate still mechanically weak - cannot bear full loads without frame support.

Weeks 4-12Mid Consolidation

Progressive mineralization visible on radiographs. Cortices forming along periphery. Three cortices rule: wait until 3 of 4 cortices visible on AP and lateral X-rays.

Weeks 12+Late Consolidation

Cortical maturation continuing. Medullary canal reestablishing. Safe for frame removal once 3 cortices mature and patient pain-free.

Consolidation Index:

  • Standard: 30-45 days per centimeter lengthened
  • Example: 5cm lengthening requires 150-225 days consolidation
  • Children: 30 days/cm (faster)
  • Adults: 40-45 days/cm
  • Smokers, diabetes: 50+ days/cm

Three Cortices Rule: Must see 3 of 4 cortices (AP and lateral views) before considering frame removal. Fourth cortex will mature after removal.

Phase 4: Remodeling

After frame removal, bone continues remodeling for months to years, gradually achieving normal architecture.

TimeframeProcessRadiographic Appearance
3-6 months post-removalCortical thickeningIncreased density, defined cortices
6-12 monthsMedullary canal formationCentral lucency developing
1-2 yearsComplete remodelingNormal bone architecture restored

Clinical Relevance and Applications

Limb Length Discrepancy

The most common indication for distraction osteogenesis is limb length discrepancy exceeding 2-3 cm. Distraction avoids need for bone graft and allows simultaneous soft tissue adaptation.

Advantages in LLD:

  • No graft harvest morbidity
  • Precise control of final length
  • Can correct angular deformity simultaneously
  • Soft tissues lengthen gradually
  • Often allows weight-bearing during treatment

Bone Defects

Large bone defects from trauma, infection, or tumor resection can be managed with distraction osteogenesis using bone transport technique.

Bone Transport:

  • Corticotomy performed proximal or distal to defect
  • Bone segment transported through defect at 1mm/day
  • Regenerate forms in transport zone
  • Segment docks with opposite end when defect filled

Stature Lengthening

Cosmetic stature lengthening is controversial but increasingly requested, particularly in countries where it's culturally valued.

Ethical Considerations

Cosmetic lengthening in normal individuals raises ethical questions:

  • Significant morbidity (9-12 months in frames)
  • Complication rates 30-40%
  • Risk of permanent nerve injury
  • Psychological assessment essential
  • Most professional societies advise caution

Only proceed after extensive counseling about risks, timeline, and functional impact.

Evidence Base

Optimal Distraction Rate: 1mm/day Superior

3
Ilizarov GA • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic study of distraction rates from 0.5 to 4 mm/day
  • 1 mm/day produced best quality regenerate bone
  • Faster rates (over 2mm/day) caused fibrous non-union
  • Slower rates (under 0.5mm/day) caused premature consolidation
  • Frequency of distraction (rhythm) affects outcome - 4x daily optimal
Clinical Implication: The standard 1mm/day distraction rate in 4 increments is evidence-based and should not be deviated from without good reason.
Limitation: Original work in Russian with limited English translation; modern studies confirm principles.

Blood Flow Increases During Distraction

2
Yasui N, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Br (1997)
Key Findings:
  • Laser Doppler measurement of blood flow during tibial lengthening
  • Blood flow increased 2-3 times baseline during distraction phase
  • Flow remained elevated during consolidation
  • Correlated with bone formation rate
  • Vessel density increased in regenerate zone
Clinical Implication: The tension-stress effect dramatically increases vascularity, explaining why avascular bone defects can be successfully treated.
Limitation: Small sample size; animal models show even greater increases.

Consolidation Index Predicts Frame Removal Safety

3
Paley D • J Pediatr Orthop (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective analysis of 111 limb lengthenings
  • Consolidation index 36 days/cm average for safe removal
  • Premature removal (under 30 days/cm) increased refracture risk to 15%
  • Three cortices rule correlates with mechanical strength
  • Children consolidate faster than adults (30 vs 40-45 days/cm)
Clinical Implication: The consolidation index provides objective criterion for frame removal timing, reducing refracture risk.
Limitation: Subjective assessment of cortical maturity on radiographs; CT may provide more objective measure.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Basic Principles and Phases

EXAMINER

"Examiner asks: Describe the biological principles of distraction osteogenesis and the phases involved."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Distraction osteogenesis is based on Ilizarov's tension-stress law, which states that gradual controlled traction on living tissues creates mechanical stress that stimulates regeneration. The technique has four phases: First, the Latency phase lasting 5-7 days after corticotomy allows hematoma formation and inflammatory response. Second, the Distraction phase at 1mm per day in 4 increments stimulates intramembranous bone formation between the separating segments. Third, the Consolidation phase lasting 30-45 days per centimeter lengthened allows mineralization and cortical maturation. Fourth, the Remodeling phase continues for months to years after frame removal. The key principles include stable fixation, preserving blood supply via corticotomy technique, respecting biology with low-energy surgery, allowing adequate latency, maintaining exact rate and rhythm during distraction, and ensuring sufficient consolidation before frame removal.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Tension-stress law: gradual traction stimulates regeneration
Four phases: Latency (5-7d), Distraction (1mm/day), Consolidation (30-45d/cm), Remodeling
Corticotomy preserves endosteal blood supply
Exact rate (1mm/day) and rhythm (4x daily) critical for success
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing osteotomy with corticotomy technique
✗Missing the importance of rhythm (frequency) in addition to rate
✗Not mentioning the consolidation index (30-45 days/cm)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What happens if you distract too fast?"
"How do you know when to remove the frame?"
"What is the difference between corticotomy and osteotomy?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Clinical Problem - Poor Regenerate

EXAMINER

"You are lengthening a 12-year-old's femur for limb length discrepancy. At 3 weeks of distraction (21mm gained), radiographs show a widening radiolucent gap with minimal bone formation. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This represents poor regenerate formation, indicating the distraction rate is too fast for this patient's biological response. The radiolucent gap suggests fibrous tissue is forming instead of bone. My immediate management would be to slow or pause distraction. I would first pause for 3-5 days to allow bone formation to catch up, then resume at a slower rate of 0.5-0.75mm per day instead of 1mm per day. I would obtain weekly radiographs to monitor regenerate quality. If bone columns appear within 1-2 weeks, I can gradually increase back toward 1mm per day. If no improvement occurs, I would consider factors affecting bone formation such as smoking exposure, nutritional deficiency, or inadequate frame stability. In severe cases with established non-union, I may need to compress the gap, allow consolidation, and restart with slower distraction. The key is early recognition and prompt adjustment before significant fibrous tissue forms.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Poor regenerate indicates distraction too fast
Pause distraction for 3-5 days initially
Resume at slower rate (0.5-0.75mm/day)
Monitor weekly with radiographs
Consider systemic factors if no improvement
COMMON TRAPS
✗Continuing at same rate hoping it will catch up (it won't)
✗Immediately compressing the gap (try slowing first)
✗Not checking for technical issues (loose frame, shear motion)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When would you consider aborting the lengthening?"
"What if neurological symptoms develop?"
"How do you counsel families about this complication?"

MCQ Practice Points

Optimal Distraction Rate Question

Q: What is the standard distraction rate in distraction osteogenesis? A: 1 mm per day in 4 increments of 0.25mm each (every 6 hours). This rate balances bone regeneration capacity with soft tissue tolerance.

Consolidation Index Question

Q: What is the consolidation index and typical value? A: 30-45 days per centimeter lengthened - the time required in frame during consolidation phase before safe removal. Children 30 days/cm, adults 40-45 days/cm.

Corticotomy Technique Question

Q: Why is corticotomy preferred over osteotomy in distraction osteogenesis? A: Preserves endosteal blood supply which provides 70-80% of bone blood flow. Multiple drill holes connected with osteotome maintains medullary contents and stem cells critical for regeneration.

Tension-Stress Law Question

Q: What is Ilizarov's tension-stress law? A: Gradual controlled traction on living tissues creates mechanical stress that stimulates and maintains regeneration of bone, soft tissues, nerves, and blood vessels. Foundation principle of distraction osteogenesis.

Three Cortices Rule Question

Q: What radiographic criterion indicates safe frame removal? A: Three of four cortices visible on AP and lateral radiographs, along with consolidation index of 30-45 days/cm. Fourth cortex matures after removal.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology and Practice

Distraction Osteogenesis in Australia:

  • Limb lengthening and deformity correction performed at tertiary paediatric and adult orthopaedic centres
  • RACS fellowship training in paediatric orthopaedics and limb reconstruction provides subspecialty expertise
  • Ilizarov and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) techniques available at major metropolitan centres

RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:

  • Distraction osteogenesis principles are core FRACS Basic Science examination content
  • Ilizarov's tension-stress law, corticotomy technique, and consolidation index frequently examined
  • Understanding rate and rhythm (1mm/day in 4 increments) is essential knowledge
  • Complications of distraction including nerve palsy, pin site infection, and regenerate failure are key viva topics

Paediatric Orthopaedic Practice:

  • Major paediatric centres (Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Children's Hospital Westmead) perform complex limb reconstruction
  • Limb length discrepancy secondary to fibular hemimelia, PFFD, and post-traumatic conditions commonly treated
  • Multidisciplinary approach involving physiotherapy, orthotists, and psychosocial support

Clinical Applications in Australia:

  • Bone transport for large segmental defects following trauma or infection
  • Deformity correction for congenital and acquired angular deformities
  • Management of post-traumatic limb length discrepancy
  • Treatment of complex non-unions with distraction and compression techniques

PBS Considerations:

  • Pain management medications including paracetamol and NSAIDs PBS-subsidised for post-operative care
  • Prophylactic antibiotics for pin site infection prevention per eTG guidelines
  • Vitamin D and calcium supplementation for bone health during consolidation phase

eTG Recommendations:

  • Pin site care protocols to prevent infection (antiseptic cleansing, early treatment of infection)
  • VTE prophylaxis during prolonged immobilisation phases
  • Antibiotic guidelines for pin site infections (flucloxacillin first-line for Staphylococcus aureus)

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Distraction Osteogenesis
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Distraction OsteogenesisCredit: OrthoVellum

DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Principles (Ilizarov)

  • •Tension-stress law = gradual traction stimulates regeneration
  • •Stable fixation with rigid external frame
  • •Corticotomy (not osteotomy) preserves endosteal blood supply
  • •Low-energy surgical technique respects biology

Four Phases Timeline

  • •Latency: 5-7 days (hematoma formation)
  • •Distraction: 1mm/day in 4 increments (bone regeneration)
  • •Consolidation: 30-45 days/cm (mineralization)
  • •Remodeling: months-years (cortical maturation)

Critical Parameters

  • •Rate: 1mm per day total
  • •Rhythm: 4 increments of 0.25mm (every 6 hours)
  • •Consolidation index: 30-45 days per cm
  • •Three cortices visible before frame removal

Troubleshooting

  • •Too fast distraction = fibrous non-union (radiolucent gap)
  • •Too slow distraction = premature consolidation
  • •Poor regenerate = pause 3-5 days, slow to 0.5mm/day
  • •Nerve symptoms = slow to 0.75mm/day or pause

Biological Responses

  • •Bone: intramembranous ossification (no cartilage)
  • •Blood flow: increases 2-3x during distraction
  • •Nerves: tolerate 1-2mm/day gradual elongation
  • •Soft tissues: muscle sarcomeres added, vessels elongate
Quick Stats
Reading Time62 min
Related Topics

Abductor Digiti Minimi - Anatomy and Clinical Relevance

Bioabsorbable Materials

Bone Grafts

Calcium Phosphate Cements