Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

DRUJ Arthritis (Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthritis)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

DRUJ Arthritis (Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthritis)

Degenerative or post-traumatic arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint causing ulnar-sided wrist pain and forearm rotation limitation, managed with conservative measures or surgical procedures including DRUJ arthroplasty and salvage procedures

complete
Updated: 2025-01-24

DRUJ Arthritis (Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthritis)

High Yield Overview

DRUJ ARTHRITIS

Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain | Post-Traumatic | Salvage Procedures

80%Post-traumatic etiology
30%After DR malunion
5-7thPeak decade
SalvageSurgical options

Surgical Options by Demand

Critical Must-Knows

  • Articulation between ulnar head and sigmoid notch critical for forearm rotation
  • Post-traumatic most common cause (distal radius malunion)
  • Clinical triad: ulnar-sided pain, restricted rotation, DRUJ crepitus/instability
  • Conservative first: activity modification, NSAIDs, splinting, injection
  • Surgical: Darrach (elderly), Sauve-Kapandji (younger), hemiresection, arthroplasty

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Piano key sign - dorsal displacement of ulnar head
  • "
    CT best for sigmoid notch assessment
  • "
    Always assess for TFCC tears, Essex-Lopresti injury
  • "
    Know indications and complications for each salvage procedure

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

AP view of the wrist at presentation in the institute showing severe arthritis of the wrist joint and the proximal carpal row. Note even the distal radioulnar joint has been eroded with large cystic a
Click to expand
AP view of the wrist at presentation in the institute showing severe arthritis of the wrist joint and the proximal carpal row. Note even the distal raCredit: Soman SM et al. via J Orthop Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
(A) The preoperative lateral radiograph showed the measurement of the radioulnar distance (RU). The pisoscaphoid distance (PS) was used to define a true lateral radiograph of the wrist. (B) The postop
Click to expand
(A) The preoperative lateral radiograph showed the measurement of the radioulnar distance (RU). The pisoscaphoid distance (PS) was used to define a trCredit: Baek GH et al. via Clin Orthop Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Core Exam Knowledge

Must Know:
  • Anatomic basis: Articulation between ulnar head and sigmoid notch of radius, critical for forearm rotation
  • Common etiology: Post-traumatic (80% - distal radius malunion most common), inflammatory arthritis, primary osteoarthritis
  • Clinical triad: Ulnar-sided wrist pain, painful restricted forearm rotation, DRUJ crepitus and instability
  • Investigation essentials: PA and lateral wrist radiographs, CT for sigmoid notch assessment, bilateral comparison views
  • Conservative first-line: Activity modification, NSAIDs, splinting in neutral rotation, corticosteroid injection
  • Surgical decision-making: Darrach (elderly, low-demand), SauvĂ©-Kapandji (younger, higher-demand), hemiresection (intermediate), DRUJ arthroplasty (selective cases)
Exam Day Essentials

Clinical Examination: DRUJ tenderness, pain with pronation/supination, piano key sign (dorsal displacement of ulnar head), grind test positive

Imaging: PA radiograph shows joint space narrowing and ulnar head deformity; CT best visualizes sigmoid notch arthrosis and subluxation

Etiology Recognition: Always assess for distal radius malunion, TFCC tears, Essex-Lopresti injury, inflammatory arthropathy

Surgical Options: Know indications and complications for Darrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, hemiresection-interposition, and DRUJ prosthesis

Incidence and Causes

Incidence and Risk Factors

IV
Finding: DRUJ arthritis develops in approximately 30% of patients following distal radius fracture malunion and is a common sequela of chronic DRUJ instability

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

PA radiograph showing DRUJ arthritis with multi-compartment wrist arthritis
Click to expand
PA radiograph demonstrating DRUJ arthritis (visible at distal radioulnar joint) along with scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint arthritis and thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. Note the joint space narrowing and subchondral sclerosis at the DRUJ, characteristic features of advanced arthritis. Multi-compartment wrist arthritis is common in inflammatory and degenerative conditions.Credit: Wollstein R et al., Arthritis - CC BY
Bilateral wrist comparison showing post-traumatic DRUJ changes with joint congruency mapping
Click to expand
Post-traumatic DRUJ changes 12 years after distal radius fracture: Left panel shows injured wrist with reduced DRUJ congruency (32.8mm²) compared to non-injured contralateral wrist (51.3mm²). The 3D joint congruency proximity maps demonstrate altered contact patterns at the distal radioulnar, radioscaphoid, and radiolunate joints. This illustrates how distal radius malunion leads to abnormal DRUJ biomechanics and accelerated arthritis development.Credit: Lalone EA et al., Open Orthop J - CC BY
Axial MRI showing rheumatoid arthritis with DRUJ synovitis
Click to expand
Axial MRI (A, B) demonstrating early rheumatoid arthritis affecting the wrist. Note the synovial thickening and congestion (active inflammation) within the DRUJ and surrounding tendon sheaths. MRI is valuable for detecting early inflammatory changes before radiographic evidence of joint destruction appears, and for assessing TFCC integrity in patients with DRUJ pathology.Credit: Sudoł-Szopińska I et al., Pol J Radiol - CC BY

The condition affects adults across all age groups but is most common in the fifth through seventh decades. Male predominance is noted in post-traumatic cases (reflecting higher trauma incidence), while inflammatory arthropathy cases show female predominance. Occupational risk factors include repetitive forceful gripping with forearm rotation (mechanics, carpenters, assembly workers) and prior wrist trauma (athletes, manual laborers).

Pathophysiology

The DRUJ is a diarthrodial articulation critical for forearm rotation. The ulnar head (convex) articulates with the sigmoid notch of the radius (concave), with stability provided by the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments, interosseous membrane, and joint capsule. Normal forearm rotation requires congruent articular surfaces, intact ligamentous support, and balanced muscle forces.

High Yield Concepts

Piano Key Sign

Dorsal-volar instability of the ulnar head. Indicates DRUJ incompetence.

Darrach Risk

Ulnar Stump Instability. Avoid Darrach in young/high-demand patients. Use Sauvé-Kapandji instead.

Radiographic Trap

Ulnar Variance. Must be measured on PA view in Neutral Rotation (Pronation increases positive variance).

At a Glance

DRUJ arthritis is degenerative or post-traumatic arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint, most commonly following distal radius malunion (60-70% of cases). It presents with ulnar-sided wrist pain, crepitus, and restricted forearm pronation/supination. The piano key sign (dorsally prominent ulna) and DRUJ grind test are key examination findings. Treatment options include activity modification and NSAIDs for mild disease, progressing to surgery for refractory cases: Darrach procedure (ulnar head resection) for low-demand elderly patients, Sauvé-Kapandji (DRUJ fusion with proximal ulna pseudarthrosis) for younger active patients, or DRUJ arthroplasty in select cases.

Distal radius malunion alters DRUJ biomechanics through several mechanisms including dorsal angulation increasing load on dorsal sigmoid notch, radial shortening creating positive ulnar variance and increased DRUJ pressure, and articular step-off creating point loading and accelerated cartilage wear. Chronic DRUJ instability from TFCC insufficiency leads to abnormal kinematics with repetitive subluxation, synovitis, and progressive cartilage degeneration.

Patient Presentation

History

Patients typically present with ulnar-sided wrist pain that is activity-related and worse with forearm rotation, gripping, and loading. Specific aggravating activities include turning doorknobs, using screwdrivers, wringing towels, push-ups, and keyboard use. Pain may radiate proximally into the forearm or distally into the ulnar digits. Mechanical symptoms including clicking, catching, or popping with rotation suggest instability or loose bodies.

History of antecedent trauma (particularly distal radius fracture) should be elicited, including mechanism, treatment received (operative versus non-operative), and healing complications. P

Key Mnemonics

Mnemonic

RADIO ProblemsDRUJ Arthritis Etiologic Factors

R
Radius malunion
Distal radius fracture, most common cause
A
Articular incongruity
Intra-articular fracture extension
D
DRUJ instability
TFCC tears, ligament disruption
I
Inflammatory arthritis
Rheumatoid, psoriatic arthropathy
O
Osteoarthritis
Primary degenerative, less common

Memory Hook:RADIO problems lead to DRUJ arthritis - think of the distal RADIUS as the key player

Mnemonic

DASH SolutionsDRUJ Arthritis Surgical Procedures

D
Darrach
Ulnar head excision, elderly low-demand
A
Arthroplasty of DRUJ
Prosthetic replacement, selective cases
S
Sauvé-Kapandji
Radioulnar fusion + ulnar pseudarthrosis, younger active
H
Hemiresection-interposition
Bowers procedure, intermediate option

Memory Hook:When conservative treatment fails, use DASH Solutions for DRUJ arthritis

atients may report progressive worsening over months to years since the initial injury. In inflammatory arthropathy cases, systemic symptoms and involvement of other joints should be documented.

Physical Examination

Examiner's Tip:

Inspection: Swelling over ulnar wrist (usually mild), prominence of ulnar head (dorsal subluxation), muscle atrophy (rare unless chronic severe pain)

Palpation: DRUJ tenderness (dorsally and volarly over ulnar head), crepitus with forearm rotation, ulnar styloid tenderness (TFCC involvement)

Range of Motion: Measure active pronation and supination with elbow flexed 90 degrees, compare to contralateral side; typical loss of 30-50% motion in each direction

Provocative Tests: Piano key sign (dorsal-volar translation of ulnar head), DRUJ grind test (axial compression with pronation/supination), ulnar fovea sign (TFCC pathology)

Stability Assessment: Dorsal-volar translation compared to contralateral wrist in neutral, pronation, and supination

Neurovascular: Assess ulnar nerve function, ulnar artery (Guyon canal), dorsal sensory ulnar nerve branches

The DRUJ grind test is performed by stabilizing the distal radius with one hand while grasping the ulnar head with the other, applying axial compression and rotating through pronation and supination. Crepitus and reproduction of pain indicate DRUJ arthritis. The piano key sign assesses DRUJ stability by applying dorsal and volar directed forces to the ulnar head while stabilizing the radius, looking for excessive translation and reproduction of symptoms.

Functional Impact

Functional deficits vary with severity but commonly include difficulty with activities requiring forearm rotation (turning keys, opening jars, using screwdrivers), reduced grip strength due to pain inhibition (20-40% reduction typical), inability to bear weight on extended wrist (push-ups, yoga), and difficulty with keyboard and mouse use. Patients may develop compensatory strategies such as rotating the entire arm from the shoulder rather than forearm rotation.

Radiographic Workup

Radiographic Evaluation

Standard wrist radiographs (PA, lateral, oblique) form the initial imaging assessment. PA view demonstrates joint space narrowing at the DRUJ, subchondral sclerosis, ulnar head deformity or flattening, and cystic changes in advanced cases. Assessment of ulnar variance is critical, as positive ulnar variance (ulnar head extends beyond radial articular surface) increases DRUJ loading and accelerates arthritis. Comparison with the contralateral uninjured wrist is valuable.

IV
Finding: Radiographic assessment of DRUJ arthritis requires PA and lateral views to assess joint space and ulnar variance, plus CT scanning to evaluate sigmoid notch morphology and degree of arthrosis

Advanced Imaging

Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for detailed assessment of DRUJ arthritis. CT clearly demonstrates sigmoid notch morphology and articular surface irregularity, ulnar head shape and arthrosis, degree of subluxation or dislocation, presence of loose bodies or osteophytes, and quality of bone stock for surgical planning. Bilateral CT with forearm in pronation, neutral, and supination allows assessment of dynamic stability and subluxation patterns.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluates soft tissue structures including TFCC integrity (central perforation, peripheral detachment), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon pathology, interosseous membrane injury, and bone marrow edema indicating active arthritic process. MRI is particularly valuable when concomitant soft tissue pathology is suspected or when evaluating younger patients where TFCC repair might be considered.

Diagnostic Injection

Fluoroscopically guided DRUJ corticosteroid injection serves diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Temporary complete pain relief confirms DRUJ arthritis as the primary pain generator, which is valuable when multiple potential sources exist (ulnar impaction syndrome, TFCC tears, ECU tendinopathy). The injection typically uses corticosteroid (triamcinolone 40mg) with local anesthetic (lidocaine or bupivacaine), injected into the DRUJ space under fluoroscopic guidance.

Staging and Associated Pathology

Staging by Etiology

DRUJ arthritis is staged by etiology to guide treatment. Post-traumatic arthritis (most common) results from distal radius malunion, intra-articular fracture, chronic DRUJ instability, or Essex-Lopresti injury. Inflammatory arthritis includes rheumatoid arthritis (often bilateral with synovitis and bone erosion), psoriatic arthritis, and crystalline arthropathy. Primary osteoarthritis occurs without clear antecedent trauma and is less common. Neuromuscular causes include cerebral palsy and other spasticity disorders with chronic abnormal forces.

Severity Grading

DRUJ Arthritis Severity and Treatment Correlation

featureradiographicsymptomstreatment
Early arthritisMild joint space narrowing, minimal sclerosisIntermittent pain, mild rotation lossConservative management, activity modification
Moderate arthritisObvious joint space loss, sclerosis, osteophytesRegular pain with activities, 30-40% rotation lossConservative trial, surgical if failed
Advanced arthritisSevere space loss, cysts, deformity, instabilityConstant pain, severe rotation limitation greater than 50%Surgical reconstruction typically required
End-stage with instabilityBone-on-bone, subluxation, ulnar head destructionSevere pain and instability, minimal functionSalvage procedure essential

Management

Non-Operative Treatment

IV
Finding: Conservative management including activity modification, NSAIDs, and corticosteroid injection provides satisfactory symptom control in 40-50% of patients with early to moderate DRUJ arthritis

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide symptomatic relief. Topical NSAIDs may be preferred for patients with GI concerns. Splinting in neutral forearm rotation with a long arm splint or Muenster-type orthosis reduces symptoms by limiting rotation, worn during aggravating activities or at night. Custom thermoplastic splints can be fabricated by hand therapists.

Corticosteroid injection into the DRUJ provides temporary relief in 60-70% of patients, lasting weeks to months. Repeat injections may be performed but are generally limited to 2-3 per year. Physical therapy focuses on maintaining range of motion and strengthening forearm and wrist muscles to provide dynamic stability.

Indications for Surgery

Surgery is considered when conservative management fails to control symptoms after 3-6 months, pain significantly limits function or quality of life, progressive instability develops, or patients have high functional demands incompatible with conservative restrictions. Relative contraindications include active infection, severe osteoporosis (compromises fixation for Sauvé-Kapandji), unrealistic expectations, and significant medical comorbidities precluding surgery.

Surgical Options Overview

Darrach Procedure

The Darrach procedure involves excision of the distal ulna (typically 1.5-2.5cm of ulnar head and neck). The technique uses a dorsal or ulnar approach to the DRUJ, subperiosteal dissection to protect the TFCC remnant and ECU tendon, and transection of the ulna at an appropriate level (preserving adequate ulna for forearm function). Soft tissue stabilization with ECU tendon or TFCC remnant coverage of the ulnar stump reduces instability.

Indications for Darrach include elderly low-demand patients (age greater than 60 years), severe DRUJ arthritis with ulnar head destruction, rheumatoid arthritis with bone erosion, and revision of failed other procedures. Advantages include technical simplicity, reliable pain relief, and no implant-related complications. Disadvantages include ulnar stump instability (painful prominence of ulna with gripping), reduced grip strength (10-20% reduction), and cosmetic concerns (visible depression at DRUJ).

Postoperative management involves short arm splint for 2 weeks followed by progressive range of motion. Full activity is typically allowed at 6-8 weeks. Outcomes include good pain relief in 75-85% but with variable grip strength recovery and potential ulnar stump instability requiring subsequent soft tissue stabilization.

Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure

Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs showing Sauvé-Kapandji procedure
Click to expand
Sauvé-Kapandji procedure for DRUJ arthritis: (a) Posteroanterior radiograph showing successful radioulnar fusion at the DRUJ (black arrow) with the ulnar pseudarthrosis gap proximal to the fusion site (white arrow). (b) Lateral view demonstrating the same construct. This procedure preserves the ulnar head and TFCC attachments while allowing forearm rotation through the proximal ulnar pseudarthrosis. Ideal for younger, higher-demand patients with DRUJ arthritis who require preserved grip strength and forearm rotation.Credit: Watanabe A et al., Skeletal Radiol - CC BY 4.0

The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure creates a radioulnar fusion at the DRUJ level combined with an ulnar pseudarthrosis proximal to the fusion site. The technique involves exposure of the DRUJ, preparation of articular surfaces (radius sigmoid notch and ulnar head), fusion of radius to ulna in neutral rotation using K-wires or compression screw, and creation of a 1-1.5cm segment of ulna resection proximal to the fusion (allowing forearm rotation through the pseudarthrosis).

IV
Finding: The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure provides excellent pain relief and maintains forearm rotation while stabilizing the DRUJ in younger, higher-demand patients

Postoperative management includes long arm cast or splint for 4-6 weeks until fusion is evident, followed by protected motion for 2-4 additional weeks. Full unrestricted activity is allowed at 3-4 months. Outcomes are generally excellent with 85-90% patient satisfaction, good pain relief, and maintained rotation (80-90% of contralateral side).

Hemiresection-Interposition Arthroplasty (Bowers)

The Bowers procedure involves resection of the ulnar head articular surface (removing approximately 50% of the head) with soft tissue interposition (typically palmaris longus autograft or allograft). The technique preserves the ulnar styloid and TFCC attachments while removing the arthritic ulnar head dome. Interposition material is secured between the remaining ulna and radius to prevent bone-on-bone contact and provide cushioning.

Indications include intermediate-age patients (45-65 years), moderate DRUJ arthritis with preserved ulnar styloid and TFCC, and patients desiring stability without fusion. Advantages include preservation of TFCC attachment providing stability, less extensive than Darrach (preserves more ulna), and maintained forearm rotation. Disadvantages include technically demanding, potential for inadequate resection with recurrent pain, and interposition material attenuation over time with symptom recurrence.

Outcomes are good to excellent in 70-80% of patients at short to intermediate term (2-5 years), with some reports of declining results at longer follow-up. The procedure serves as an intermediate option between conservative management and more extensive salvage procedures.

DRUJ Prosthetic Arthroplasty

DRUJ prosthetic replacement uses implants that reconstruct the ulnar head with a metal stem and articular component. Several designs exist including constrained (linked radius and ulna components) and unconstrained (ulnar head replacement only) systems. The procedure involves DRUJ exposure, excision of arthritic ulnar head, preparation of ulnar canal for stem, and implantation of the prosthesis with secure fixation.

Indications include younger patients with isolated DRUJ arthritis and intact TFCC, failed prior DRUJ procedures requiring revision, and high functional demands requiring maximal function preservation. Advantages include maintained DRUJ anatomy and stability, good forearm rotation, and potential for improved outcomes over ulnar head excision. Disadvantages include implant cost, risk of loosening or failure (10-15% at 5-10 years), polyethylene wear, and technical challenges with revision if needed.

Long-term outcome data is limited compared to established procedures like Darrach and Sauvé-Kapandji. The procedure is reserved for carefully selected patients in centers with expertise in DRUJ arthroplasty.

Complications

Surgical Complications

Examiner's Tip:

Ulnar Stump Instability: Common after Darrach (30-40%), especially in younger patients; prevent with adequate soft tissue stabilization; treat symptomatic cases with tendon stabilization procedures

Nonunion after Sauvé-Kapandji: Occurs in 5-10%; usually at the fusion site; requires revision with bone graft and rigid fixation if symptomatic

Nerve Injury: Dorsal sensory ulnar nerve at risk with all approaches; protect during dissection; painful neuromas may require excision and burial

Stiffness: May occur after any procedure; prevent with early motion protocols; aggressive therapy if excessive

Implant-Related: Loosening, wear, breakage with DRUJ prosthesis; requires surveillance and revision surgery if symptomatic

Early complications include wound healing problems (infection, dehiscence, hematoma), nerve injury (dorsal sensory branch of ulnar nerve most common), and early instability. Late complications include ulnar stump instability after Darrach (30-40% incidence, higher in younger active patients), nonunion after Sauvé-Kapandji fusion (5-10%), persistent or recurrent pain (10-20% across all procedures), prosthesis loosening or wear (10-15% at 5-10 years for DRUJ arthroplasty), and complex regional pain syndrome (rare, less than 5%).

Outcomes and Prognosis

Patient satisfaction and functional outcomes vary by procedure and patient selection. Darrach procedure achieves good pain relief in 75-85% but with variable grip strength (typically 80-90% of contralateral) and risk of ulnar stump instability especially in younger patients. Sauvé-Kapandji achieves excellent outcomes in 85-90% with good pain relief, maintained rotation (80-90%), and stable DRUJ, making it preferred for younger active patients.

Hemiresection-interposition achieves good to excellent outcomes in 70-80% at intermediate follow-up but may deteriorate over longer term. DRUJ prosthetic arthroplasty has promising early results but limited long-term data; preliminary reports suggest 80-85% satisfaction at 5 years with 10-15% revision rate.

Factors predicting better outcomes include appropriate procedure selection for patient age and activity level, absence of inflammatory arthropathy, good bone stock, and realistic patient expectations. Poor prognostic factors include workers' compensation or litigation, unrealistic expectations, severe osteoporosis, and active smoking (affects healing).

Quick Review Summary

DRUJ Arthritis Overview

Definition:

  • Degenerative or post-traumatic arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint
  • Ulnar head articulates with sigmoid notch of radius
  • Critical for forearm pronation/supination

Key Clinical Features:

  • Ulnar-sided wrist pain with rotation
  • Painful restricted pronation/supination
  • DRUJ tenderness and crepitus
  • Piano key sign (dorsal-volar instability)

DRUJ Arthritis Etiology

CauseFrequencyCharacteristics
Post-traumatic (distal radius malunion)60-70%Most common, assess for malunion correction
DRUJ instability/TFCC injury10-15%Chronic instability leads to arthritis
Inflammatory arthritis10-15%RA, psoriatic arthritis, bilateral
Primary osteoarthritis5-10%No clear antecedent trauma

Biomechanical Considerations

Exam Viva Point

Distal Radius Malunion Effects on DRUJ:

  • Dorsal angulation → Increased dorsal sigmoid notch loading
  • Radial shortening → Positive ulnar variance, increased DRUJ pressure
  • Articular incongruity → Point loading, accelerated wear

DRUJ Stability Factors:

  • TFCC (primary stabilizer)
  • Dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments
  • Interosseous membrane
  • Joint capsule
  • Dynamic stabilizers (ECU, pronator quadratus)

Anatomy

DRUJ Anatomy

Bony Anatomy:

  • Ulnar head (convex) articulates with sigmoid notch of radius (concave)
  • Sigmoid notch covers only 60-80 degrees of ulnar head circumference
  • Ulnar head sits slightly palmar and ulnar to radius

Key Stabilizers:

  • TFCC (Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex) - primary stabilizer
  • Dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments
  • Interosseous membrane (central band most important)
  • Joint capsule and pronator quadratus

DRUJ Anatomic Structures

StructureFunctionClinical Relevance
Sigmoid notchConcave radial surface for DRUJArthritis affects notch cartilage, assess on CT
Ulnar headConvex articulation, pivot for rotationExcision (Darrach) or replacement options
TFCCPrimary DRUJ stabilizerInjury leads to instability then arthritis
Dorsal RU ligamentResists palmar translation in supinationAssess stability preoperatively
Palmar RU ligamentResists dorsal translation in pronationKey for surgical reconstruction

Biomechanical Considerations

Exam Viva Point

DRUJ Kinematics:

  • Ulnar head remains relatively stationary during rotation
  • Radius rotates around ulna (not ulna around radius)
  • Contact area changes throughout pronation-supination arc
  • In pronation: Dorsal sigmoid contacts dorsal ulnar head
  • In supination: Palmar sigmoid contacts palmar ulnar head

Sigmoid Notch Morphology (Tolat Classification):

  • Type I (Flat face) - 42%
  • Type II (Ski slope) - 14%
  • Type III (C-type) - 30%
  • Type IV (S-type) - 14%

Clinical Significance:

  • Morphology affects load distribution
  • Ski slope type may predispose to instability
  • Important for prosthetic design and sizing

Viva Grading Review

DRUJ Arthritis Classification

By Etiology:

  • Post-traumatic (most common - 60-70%)
  • Inflammatory (RA, psoriatic)
  • Degenerative (primary osteoarthritis)
  • Secondary to instability

DRUJ Arthritis Severity Classification

GradeRadiographic FindingsClinical FeaturesTreatment Options
Grade I (Mild)Minimal joint space narrowing, preserved sigmoid notchMild pain with activity, minimal ROM lossConservative management, consider malunion correction
Grade II (Moderate)Moderate narrowing, early osteophytes, ulnar head changesModerate pain, 20-40% rotation lossAddress etiology, consider hemiresection or Sauvé-Kapandji
Grade III (Severe)Bone-on-bone, sigmoid notch erosion, ulnar head deformitySevere pain, greater than 50% rotation loss, instabilityDarrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, or prosthesis

Classification Considerations

Exam Viva Point

Treatment Selection by Classification:

  • Grade I with correctable malunion → Radius osteotomy may halt progression
  • Grade II with intact sigmoid → Hemiresection-interposition or matched resection
  • Grade II-III, young active → SauvĂ©-Kapandji or ulnar head replacement
  • Grade III, elderly/low demand → Darrach procedure
  • Grade III, inflammatory → Darrach (bone stock often poor)

Associated Pathology Assessment:

  • TFCC integrity (affects procedure selection)
  • ECU tendon status
  • Ulnocarpal impaction
  • Carpal arthritis (RA patients)
  • Radius malunion parameters

CT Classification of Sigmoid Notch:

  • Normal: Smooth, concave, good cartilage coverage
  • Eroded: Irregular surface, loss of concavity
  • Destroyed: Flat or convex, no cartilage remaining

Viva Examination Review

Clinical Examination

History:

  • Ulnar-sided wrist pain, worse with rotation
  • Difficulty with doorknobs, screwdrivers, wringing towels
  • Previous trauma (distal radius fracture most common)
  • Inflammatory arthritis history

Examination Findings:

  • DRUJ tenderness (dorsally and ulnarly)
  • Crepitus with forearm rotation
  • Reduced pronation/supination (quantify loss)
  • Piano key sign (dorsal-volar instability)
  • DRUJ grind test (axial load with rotation)

DRUJ Clinical Tests

TestTechniquePositive FindingSignificance
Piano Key SignPush ulnar head dorsally to volarlyIncreased dorsal prominence, reducibleDRUJ instability
DRUJ Grind TestAxial load through ulna with rotationPain and crepitusDRUJ arthritis
DRUJ BallottementStabilize radius, translate ulnaIncreased translation vs contralateralDRUJ instability
Foveal SignTenderness at ulnar fovea (between FCU and ulnar styloid)Point tendernessTFCC foveal tear

Advanced Assessment

Exam Viva Point

Systematic DRUJ Examination:

  1. Inspection: Ulnar head prominence, swelling, deformity
  2. Palpation: DRUJ, ulnar styloid, fovea, ECU tendon
  3. ROM: Active and passive pronation/supination (normal 80/80)
  4. Stability: Piano key, ballottement in neutral, pronation, supination
  5. Crepitus: Rotation under load
  6. Grip strength: Compare to contralateral
  7. Associated pathology: TFCC, ECU, ulnocarpal

Differential Diagnosis:

  • TFCC tear (isolated)
  • ECU tendinopathy or subluxation
  • Ulnocarpal impaction syndrome
  • Ulnar styloid impingement
  • Lunotriquetral instability

Provocative Testing:

  • Ulnocarpal stress test (ulnar deviation with axial load)
  • ECU synergy test (resisted supination/extension)
  • Press test (pushing up from chair)

Viva Imaging Review

Imaging Protocol

Plain Radiographs:

  • PA (neutral rotation) - assess ulnar variance
  • True lateral - DRUJ alignment
  • Oblique views if needed

CT Scan (Gold Standard for DRUJ):

  • Sigmoid notch morphology and integrity
  • Ulnar head changes
  • Degree of subluxation
  • Bone stock for surgical planning

DRUJ Imaging Modalities

ModalityKey FindingsWhen to Order
Plain X-rayJoint space narrowing, osteophytes, ulnar variance, subluxationAll patients, first-line
CT scanSigmoid notch detail, subluxation quantification, bone stockPreoperative planning, unclear diagnosis
MRITFCC integrity, soft tissue pathology, early arthritisTFCC suspected, soft tissue assessment
Diagnostic injectionConfirms DRUJ as pain sourceMultiple pain sources, unclear diagnosis

Advanced Imaging

Exam Viva Point

CT Assessment Protocol:

  1. Bilateral comparison essential (assess subtle subluxation)
  2. Axial cuts through DRUJ (3mm slices)
  3. Positions: Neutral, pronation, supination
  4. Assess: Sigmoid notch cartilage, ulnar head morphology, subluxation degree
  5. Measure: Radioulnar ratio for subluxation quantification

Radioulnar Ratio (Mino Method):

  • Line along dorsal radius surface
  • Measure ulnar head position relative to line
  • Normal: Ulnar head within 10% of dorsal line
  • Subluxation: Greater than 10% displacement

MRI Indications:

  • TFCC assessment (integrity affects procedure selection)
  • ECU pathology
  • Early arthritis (cartilage assessment)
  • Inflammatory arthritis staging

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Druj Arthritis Management Algorithm
Click to expand

Management Algorithm

Conservative Management:

  • Activity modification (avoid rotation under load)
  • Wrist splinting (ulnar gutter or forearm-based)
  • NSAIDs
  • Corticosteroid injection (diagnostic and therapeutic)
  • Hand therapy (ROM, strengthening)

Surgical Indications:

  • Failed conservative management (3-6 months)
  • Significant functional limitation
  • Progressive deformity or instability

Surgical Options for DRUJ Arthritis

ProcedureIndicationKey Features
Darrach (ulnar head excision)Elderly, low-demand, RA patientsSimple, reliable pain relief, risk of stump instability
Sauvé-KapandjiYounger, active patients, need ulnocarpal supportDRUJ fusion + proximal pseudarthrosis, preserves ulnar head
Hemiresection-interposition (Bowers)Moderate DRUJ arthritis, preserved sigmoidPartial ulna resection with soft tissue interposition
Ulnar head replacementYoung active, good sigmoid notchPreserves anatomy, requires good bone stock
Radius osteotomyMalunion with early arthritisCorrects underlying cause, may halt progression

Procedure Selection Algorithm

Exam Viva Point

DRUJ Arthritis Treatment Decision Tree:

Step 1 - Assess Etiology:

  • Post-traumatic with malunion → Consider corrective osteotomy if arthritis early
  • Inflammatory arthritis → Darrach preferred (poor bone precludes fusion)
  • Primary OA → Proceed to Step 2

Step 2 - Assess Patient Factors:

  • Age greater than 65, low demand → Darrach
  • Age less than 65, high demand → SauvĂ©-Kapandji or prosthesis

Step 3 - Assess Sigmoid Notch:

  • Intact sigmoid → Consider ulnar head replacement
  • Damaged sigmoid → SauvĂ©-Kapandji or Darrach

Soft Tissue Considerations:

  • TFCC intact: More options available
  • TFCC torn: Consider procedures that don't rely on TFCC
  • ECU instability: Address concurrently

Combined Procedures:

  • DRUJ procedure + ulnar shortening (positive variance)
  • DRUJ procedure + TFCC repair
  • DRUJ procedure + radius osteotomy (correct malunion)

Surgical Technique

Key Surgical Techniques

Darrach Procedure:

  • Dorsal approach between 5th and 6th compartments
  • Subperiosteal exposure of distal ulna
  • Excise 1.5-2.5 cm of distal ulna
  • Soft tissue stabilization (ECU sling or capsular interposition)
  • Close capsule and retinaculum

Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure:

  • Dorsal approach to DRUJ
  • DRUJ fusion with lag screws (2 x 3.5mm or 4.0mm)
  • Create 10mm pseudarthrosis proximal to fusion
  • Soft tissue stabilization of proximal ulna stump

Surgical Technique Comparison

ProcedureUlna ResectionKey Technical Points
DarrachDistal 1.5-2.5 cmOblique cut, soft tissue stabilization critical
Sauvé-Kapandji10mm segment proximal to DRUJFuse DRUJ, create pseudarthrosis, stabilize stump
Hemiresection (Bowers)2-4mm articular surfacePreserve ulnar styloid, interpose soft tissue
Ulnar head replacementUlnar head onlySize matching critical, preserve soft tissues

Technical Pearls

Exam Viva Point

Sauvé-Kapandji Surgical Steps:

  1. Approach: Dorsal, between 5th and 6th compartments
  2. Expose DRUJ: Preserve TFCC and dorsal capsule
  3. Prepare fusion site: Decorticate ulnar head and sigmoid notch
  4. Fuse DRUJ: 2 lag screws (3.5 or 4.0mm), 90 degrees apart
  5. Create pseudarthrosis: 10mm segment excised proximal to fusion
  6. Stabilize stump: ECU sling or pronator quadratus interposition
  7. Close: Repair capsule and retinaculum

Common Technical Errors:

  • Inadequate resection (less than 10mm) → Impingement
  • Poor soft tissue stabilization → Stump instability
  • Eccentric screw placement → Nonunion
  • Damage to TFCC → Ulnocarpal instability

Darrach Technical Tips:

  • Oblique cut (45 degrees) reduces impingement
  • Preserve ECU sheath
  • Smooth bone edges with rasp
  • Consider capsular interposition

Complications

Complications by Procedure

Darrach Procedure Complications:

  • Ulnar stump instability (most common, 20-30%)
  • Radioulnar impingement
  • ECU subluxation
  • Weakness of grip
  • Persistent pain

Sauvé-Kapandji Complications:

  • Proximal stump instability (similar to Darrach)
  • Nonunion of DRUJ fusion (5-10%)
  • ECU irritation
  • Hardware prominence

Complication Rates by Procedure

ComplicationDarrachSauvé-KapandjiUlnar Head Replacement
Instability (symptomatic)20-30%10-15%5-10%
Persistent pain10-20%10-15%10-15%
NonunionN/A5-10%N/A
Revision surgery15-20%10-15%10-15%

Complication Management

Exam Viva Point

Managing Ulnar Stump Instability:

  1. Prevention: Soft tissue stabilization at index procedure
  2. Conservative: Splinting, therapy, activity modification
  3. Surgical options:
    • ECU tenodesis
    • Pronator quadratus wrap
    • Tendon interposition (palmaris, FCR strip)
    • One-bone forearm (salvage)
  4. Salvage: Ulnar head prosthesis if bone stock adequate

Nonunion After Sauvé-Kapandji:

  • Incidence: 5-10%
  • Risk factors: Smoking, poor technique, inadequate fixation
  • Management: Revision fusion with bone graft, plate fixation

Failed DRUJ Arthroplasty:

  • Loosening, instability, sigmoid erosion
  • Revision arthroplasty or conversion to salvage procedure
  • One-bone forearm as last resort

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Darrach Procedure:

  • Short arm splint 2 weeks
  • Active ROM from 2 weeks
  • Strengthening from 6 weeks
  • Full activity 8-12 weeks

Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure:

  • Above elbow splint 2 weeks (supination)
  • Short arm splint 2-6 weeks
  • Active ROM from 6 weeks (after fusion confirmation)
  • Strengthening from 8 weeks
  • Full activity 12-16 weeks

Rehabilitation Timeline

PhaseDarrachSauvé-Kapandji
Immobilization2 weeks6 weeks
Active ROM2-4 weeks6-8 weeks
Strengthening6 weeks8-10 weeks
Full activity8-12 weeks12-16 weeks

Rehabilitation Considerations

Exam Viva Point

Key Rehabilitation Principles:

  1. Protect fusion (Sauvé-Kapandji): Avoid loading until radiographic union
  2. Early ROM (Darrach): Prevent stump adhesions
  3. Grip strengthening: Critical for functional recovery
  4. Activity-specific training: Tailor to patient occupation/hobbies

Radiographic Follow-up:

  • SauvĂ©-Kapandji: 6 weeks, 12 weeks (confirm fusion)
  • Darrach: 6 weeks (assess soft tissue healing)
  • Long-term: Annual or as needed for symptoms

Return to Work:

  • Sedentary: 2-4 weeks
  • Light manual: 6-8 weeks
  • Heavy manual: 12-16 weeks (procedure dependent)

Outcomes

Outcome Data

Darrach Procedure:

  • Pain relief: 80-85%
  • Patient satisfaction: 70-80%
  • Grip strength: 70-80% of contralateral
  • Rotation: Generally maintained or improved

Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure:

  • Fusion rate: 90-95%
  • Pain relief: 85-90%
  • Patient satisfaction: 80-85%
  • Rotation: 80-90% of preoperative (through pseudarthrosis)

Outcome Comparison by Procedure

OutcomeDarrachSauvé-KapandjiUlnar Head Replacement
Pain relief80-85%85-90%80-85%
Satisfaction70-80%80-85%80-85%
Grip strength70-80%75-85%80-90%
Revision rate15-20%10-15%10-15%

Long-term Considerations

Exam Viva Point

Factors Predicting Better Outcomes:

  • Appropriate procedure selection for patient age/demand
  • Good bone stock
  • Absence of inflammatory arthropathy
  • Non-smoker
  • Realistic patient expectations
  • Adequate soft tissue stabilization

Poor Prognostic Factors:

  • Workers' compensation/litigation
  • Unrealistic expectations
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Active smoking
  • Inflammatory arthritis (variable)

Long-term Follow-up:

  • Darrach: Stump instability may develop over time
  • SauvĂ©-Kapandji: Generally durable, pseudarthrosis rarely causes issues
  • Prosthesis: Long-term data limited, potential wear/loosening

Evidence Base

Key Evidence

Darrach Procedure:

  • Darrach WE (1913): Original description
  • High complication rates in young, active patients
  • Remains reliable for elderly, low-demand patients

Sauvé-Kapandji:

  • SauvĂ© and Kapandji (1936): Original description
  • Better outcomes in younger patients vs Darrach
  • Fusion rate 90-95%

Key Studies

StudyProcedureKey Finding
Darrach (1913)Ulnar head excisionOriginal description of procedure
Sauvé-Kapandji (1936)DRUJ fusion + pseudarthrosisPreserves ulnocarpal support
Bowers (1985)Hemiresection-interpositionAlternative for moderate arthritis
Vincent (1993)Sauvé-Kapandji vs DarrachS-K superior in younger patients

Evidence Appraisal

Exam Viva Point

Evidence Summary:

  • Most evidence is Level IV (case series)
  • No randomized controlled trials comparing procedures
  • Patient selection critical for optimal outcomes
  • Procedure choice based on patient age, demand, bone stock

Vincent (1993) - Sauvé-Kapandji vs Darrach:

  • Retrospective comparison
  • S-K better in younger, higher-demand patients
  • Darrach acceptable in elderly, low-demand patients

Current Trends:

  • Increased use of ulnar head prostheses
  • Improved soft tissue stabilization techniques
  • Better understanding of patient selection

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Post-Traumatic DRUJ Arthritis - Surgical Selection

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old carpenter presents with ulnar wrist pain 3 years after a distal radius fracture treated non-operatively. Examination reveals DRUJ tenderness, crepitus, and 50% loss of forearm rotation. Radiographs show DRUJ arthritis with dorsal malunion of the radius. Conservative management has failed. What are your surgical options and which would you recommend?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has post-traumatic DRUJ arthritis secondary to distal radius malunion. At age 55 with high functional demands as a carpenter, the surgical options include Darrach procedure, Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, hemiresection-interposition arthroplasty, or corrective osteotomy of the radius malunion if the arthritis is not too advanced. I would obtain a CT scan to assess the degree of DRUJ arthrosis, sigmoid notch morphology, and the exact deformity of the radius. Given his age (intermediate), occupation (high-demand), and post-traumatic etiology, I would favor the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure which provides excellent stability and pain relief while maintaining forearm rotation through the proximal pseudarthrosis. This is preferred over Darrach in active patients as it avoids ulnar stump instability that commonly occurs with Darrach in this population. I would counsel about the procedure including radioulnar fusion at the DRUJ with creation of a pseudarthrosis proximally, expected recovery timeline of 3-4 months to full activity, fusion rate of 90-95%, and expected outcomes of good pain relief with maintained rotation (80-90%). Alternative would be hemiresection-interposition if TFCC is well-preserved, but outcomes may be less durable long-term.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Age 55 is intermediate - too young for Darrach (risk of ulnar stump instability)
Sauvé-Kapandji preferred for younger, higher-demand patients with good bone stock
CT scan essential for assessing DRUJ arthrosis severity and sigmoid notch
Radius malunion contributes to arthritis - consider whether osteotomy indicated
Sauvé-Kapandji provides stable DRUJ with maintained rotation via proximal pseudarthrosis
Expected fusion rate 90-95%, full recovery 3-4 months, satisfaction 85-90%
COMMON TRAPS
âś—Recommending Darrach for a 55-year-old high-demand patient (high risk ulnar stump instability)
âś—Not obtaining CT to assess severity and plan surgery appropriately
âś—Failing to consider radius malunion correction if DRUJ arthritis is mild
âś—Offering DRUJ prosthesis without discussing more established procedures first
âś—Not counseling about realistic expectations for rotation recovery and timeline
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe the Sauvé-Kapandji surgical technique in detail"
"How much ulna do you resect for the proximal pseudarthrosis?"
"What are the complications of Sauvé-Kapandji and how do you manage them?"
"When would you choose Darrach over Sauvé-Kapandji?"
"What is the role of DRUJ prosthetic arthroplasty?"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Elderly Patient with DRUJ Arthritis

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old retired woman with rheumatoid arthritis presents with painful DRUJ arthritis affecting her dominant hand. She has tried NSAIDs and corticosteroid injection with temporary relief only. Radiographs show severe DRUJ arthritis with ulnar head erosion. She has low functional demands. What is your management approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This elderly patient with rheumatoid arthritis and severe DRUJ arthritis with bone erosion is an ideal candidate for the Darrach procedure (ulnar head excision). Given her age (72 years), low functional demands, and rheumatoid etiology with bone erosion, the Darrach procedure provides reliable pain relief with a technically straightforward operation. I would perform preoperative assessment including medical optimization of her rheumatoid disease, assessment of hand and wrist for other arthritic joints requiring treatment, evaluation of bone quality for surgical planning, and discussion with her rheumatologist regarding perioperative disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) management. The Darrach procedure involves excision of 1.5-2.5cm of distal ulna through a dorsal approach with soft tissue stabilization using ECU tendon or capsule to cover the ulnar stump and reduce instability. I would counsel about excellent pain relief expected (80-85%), minimal functional limitations given her low demands, risk of ulnar stump instability (less problematic in elderly low-demand patients than younger active patients), and recovery timeline of 6-8 weeks. Alternative procedures like Sauvé-Kapandji would be technically more difficult with poor bone stock and risk of nonunion, making Darrach the preferred option for this patient.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Age 72 with low demands makes Darrach procedure ideal choice
Rheumatoid arthritis with bone erosion favors Darrach over Sauvé-Kapandji (fusion difficult with poor bone)
Medical optimization and DMARD management essential perioperatively
Assess entire hand/wrist for other rheumatoid joints needing treatment
Darrach provides reliable pain relief (80-85%) with simple technique
Ulnar stump instability less problematic in elderly low-demand patients
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering Sauvé-Kapandji to elderly patient with poor bone stock (high nonunion risk)
âś—Not coordinating with rheumatologist regarding perioperative DMARD management
âś—Failing to assess other joints that may need concurrent treatment (common in RA)
âś—Offering DRUJ prosthesis to RA patient (poor bone stock, high failure risk)
âś—Not counseling about soft tissue stabilization to reduce ulnar stump instability
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe the Darrach procedure technique in detail"
"How much ulna do you excise and why?"
"How do you manage ulnar stump instability after Darrach?"
"What is the difference between Darrach and hemiresection-interposition?"
"What are perioperative considerations for rheumatoid patients undergoing hand surgery?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the causes of DRUJ arthritis and how do they affect treatment selection?

A: Causes: (1) Post-traumatic (most common) - distal radius malunion, Essex-Lopresti injury, TFCC tears; (2) Inflammatory - RA (often bilateral, involves carpal joints); (3) Degenerative - primary OA (rare, usually with positive ulnar variance). Treatment selection: Low-demand elderly: Darrach resection. High-demand/young: Matched ulnar head prosthesis, Sauvé-Kapandji, or one-bone forearm. RA with concurrent carpal disease: Consider combined procedures.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Darrach procedure and what are its indications and complications?

A: Darrach procedure: Excision of distal ulna (2-3 cm). Indications: Low-demand elderly patients, rheumatoid arthritis, failed previous DRUJ procedures. Contraindications: Young, active patients; heavy laborers; need for forearm stability. Complications: Ulnar stump instability (painful clicking, snapping - most common); Radioulnar impingement; Weakness of grip; ECU subluxation. Modifications (soft tissue stabilization, capsular interposition) reduce instability risk.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure and when is it preferred over Darrach?

A: Sauvé-Kapandji: DRUJ fusion with proximal ulnar pseudarthrosis (segment excision creates "floating" proximal ulna). Advantages over Darrach: Preserves ulnar head for ulnocarpal support; Better cosmesis (no ulnar stump); Maintains TFCC insertion. Indications: Younger, active patients; Need for ulnar-sided wrist stability. Complications: Proximal stump instability (similar to Darrach - requires soft tissue stabilization); Pseudarthrosis of fusion; ECU irritation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the options for ulnar head replacement in DRUJ arthritis?

A: Matched ulnar head arthroplasty (e.g., First Choice, Herbert): Replaces arthritic ulnar head while preserving DRUJ articulation. Advantages: Maintains forearm stability, grip strength, and ulnocarpal support. Indications: Young/active patients with isolated DRUJ arthritis and intact sigmoid notch. Requirements: Adequate sigmoid notch cartilage, stable soft tissues. Complications: Loosening, instability (requires adequate soft tissue tension), sigmoid notch erosion.

Exam Pearl

Q: How does ulnar variance affect DRUJ arthritis and treatment planning?

A: Positive ulnar variance: Ulnar impaction syndrome, increases ulnocarpal loading. May require ulnar shortening osteotomy if DRUJ preserved, or consider shortening with arthroplasty. Negative ulnar variance: Often post-traumatic (radius malunion with shortening). May require radius osteotomy to correct alignment before DRUJ procedure. Neutral variance: Isolated DRUJ procedure usually sufficient. Variance assessment on neutral rotation PA radiograph essential for surgical planning.

Australian Context

Australian Healthcare Considerations

Access to Care:

  • Public hospital hand surgery services available in major centres
  • Private hand surgeons with variable out-of-pocket costs
  • Regional patients may need travel for specialized care
  • Telehealth consultations for follow-up

Medicare and MBS:

  • DRUJ procedures covered under MBS

  • Private health insurance may cover prosthesis costs

Australian Healthcare Pathways

SettingAdvantagesConsiderations
Public hospitalNo out-of-pocket, multidisciplinary teamWait times, limited surgeon choice
Private practiceFaster access, surgeon choiceOut-of-pocket costs, insurance dependent
Regional centresLocal access for follow-upComplex cases may need referral

System Considerations

Exam Viva Point

Australian Specific Considerations:

  • Hand therapy essential for optimal outcomes
  • Workers' compensation cases require detailed documentation
  • Return-to-work planning with rehabilitation providers
  • Private prosthesis costs may have gap payments

Specialist Referral:

  • Hand surgeons (ASSH members) for complex cases
  • Rheumatologist involvement for inflammatory arthritis
  • Pain medicine specialists for complex pain

Rehabilitation:

  • Certified hand therapists available through hospitals and private practice
  • Medicare rebates for hand therapy with appropriate referral
  • Occupational rehabilitation for work-related injuries

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition and Anatomy

  • •Arthritis of distal radioulnar joint (ulnar head articulates with sigmoid notch of radius)
  • •Critical for forearm rotation (pronation/supination)
  • •Etiology: Post-traumatic 80% (distal radius malunion most common), inflammatory arthritis 10-15%, primary OA 5-10%
  • •Often associated with TFCC pathology, ECU tendinopathy

Clinical Presentation

  • •Ulnar-sided wrist pain worse with forearm rotation, gripping, loading
  • •Painful restricted pronation/supination (30-50% loss typical)
  • •DRUJ tenderness, crepitus with rotation
  • •Piano key sign (dorsal-volar instability of ulnar head)
  • •DRUJ grind test positive (axial load with rotation)
  • •Difficulty with doorknobs, screwdrivers, wringing towels

Investigation Protocol

  • •PA and lateral wrist radiographs: Joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, ulnar head deformity, assess ulnar variance
  • •GOLD STANDARD: CT scan (sigmoid notch morphology, articular surface detail, degree of subluxation, bone stock assessment)
  • •MRI: TFCC integrity, soft tissue pathology
  • •Diagnostic injection: Confirms DRUJ as pain source
  • •Bilateral comparison views valuable

Conservative Management

  • •First-line for early-moderate arthritis
  • •Activity modification (avoid forceful rotation, push-ups)
  • •NSAIDs for symptom relief
  • •Splinting in neutral rotation (Muenster-type orthosis) during activities
  • •Corticosteroid injection (60-70% temporary relief)
  • •Success rate 40-50% in early disease
  • •Surgery if 3-6 months conservative treatment fails

Surgical Options - By Patient

  • •DARRACH (ulnar head excision): Age greater than 60, low-demand, rheumatoid arthritis, severe bone erosion - Simple, reliable pain relief but ulnar stump instability and reduced grip
  • •SAUVÉ-KAPANDJI (radioulnar fusion + pseudarthrosis): Age less than 60, high-demand, good bone stock - Stable DRUJ, maintained rotation, best outcomes but technical with nonunion risk 5-10%
  • •HEMIRESECTION-INTERPOSITION (Bowers): Age 45-65, intermediate demands - Preserves TFCC, less extensive but variable long-term results

Sauvé-Kapandji Technique

  • •Create radioulnar fusion at DRUJ level (prepare articular surfaces, fix with screw/K-wires in neutral rotation)
  • •Create 1-1.5cm ulnar pseudarthrosis proximal to fusion (allows forearm rotation through this site)
  • •Advantages: Stable DRUJ, maintained rotation via pseudarthrosis, excellent pain relief, good grip strength
  • •Recovery: 3-4 months to full activity
  • •Fusion rate 90-95%, Satisfaction 85-90%

Key Complications

  • •Darrach: Ulnar stump instability (30-40%, especially younger patients), reduced grip strength (10-20%)
  • •SauvĂ©-Kapandji: Nonunion at fusion site (5-10%), ulnar stump instability if excessive proximal resection
  • •General: Nerve injury (dorsal sensory ulnar nerve), persistent pain (10-20%), wound complications, CRPS (less than 5%)

Viva Talking Points

  • •Emphasize post-traumatic etiology (distal radius malunion most common)
  • •CT scan gold standard imaging
  • •Conservative first-line (3-6 months)
  • •Surgical selection by patient age and demand: Darrach for elderly/low-demand, SauvĂ©-Kapandji for younger/high-demand
  • •Know SauvĂ©-Kapandji technique (fusion + pseudarthrosis)
  • •Ulnar stump instability main concern with Darrach
  • •Assess for associated TFCC, ECU pathology

Additional Resources and Further Reading

III
Finding: The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure provides superior stability and function compared to Darrach procedure in younger, higher-demand patients, with fusion rates of 90-95% and excellent patient satisfaction

Australian Specific Considerations

DRUJ arthritis is managed by hand and wrist surgeons in both metropolitan and regional centres across Australia. Public hospital hand services provide comprehensive assessment and treatment, with surgical procedures performed at major teaching hospitals. Private hand surgery practices offer alternative pathways with variable out-of-pocket costs depending on insurance coverage.

Imaging is readily available through public and private radiology services. CT scanning is essential for surgical planning and is accessible with appropriate referral. Medicare rebates apply for consultations, imaging, and surgical procedures (item 46441 for Darrach, 46438 for Sauvé-Kapandji, 46444 for hemiresection arthroplasty).

Hand therapy is critical for both conservative and postoperative management, provided by certified hand therapists in public hospital clinics and private practices. Customized splinting, strengthening programs, and functional retraining optimize outcomes. Medicare rebates apply for hand therapy with appropriate referral.

Workers' compensation considerations are important for occupational injuries or conditions exacerbated by work duties. Independent medical examinations, detailed causation assessment, and liaison with rehabilitation coordinators may be required. Return-to-work planning with graduated duties and ergonomic modifications facilitates successful outcomes.


This topic provides comprehensive coverage of DRUJ arthritis aligned with FRACS examination requirements, emphasizing etiology recognition, patient-specific surgical selection, and evidence-based management of this common yet challenging wrist condition.

Quick Stats
Reading Time142 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand