Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Dupuytren's Disease

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Dupuytren's Disease

Comprehensive guide to Dupuytren's contracture: pathophysiology, classification, surgical indications, treatment options, and recurrence management for FRACS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

DUPUYTREN'S DISEASE

Palmar Fibromatosis | Progressive Flexion Contracture

RingMost affected finger
30°MCP threshold for surgery
PIPHarder to correct
50%5-year recurrence

Tubiana Classification

Stage 0
PatternNodules, no contracture
TreatmentObservation
Stage I
Pattern0-45° total flexion
TreatmentConsider treatment
Stage II
Pattern45-90° total flexion
TreatmentSurgery indicated
Stage III
Pattern90-135° total flexion
TreatmentSurgery
Stage IV
PatternGreater than 135° total flexion
TreatmentSurgery, may need dermofasciectomy

Critical Must-Knows

  • Myofibroblasts produce Type III collagen causing contracture
  • Ring and little fingers most commonly affected (ulnar predominance)
  • Spiral cord displaces NV bundle central and superficial - highest injury risk
  • Surgical indications: MCP greater than 30° or ANY PIP contracture
  • Diathesis features: Young onset, bilateral, ectopic fibromatosis, family history

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Northern European/Celtic/Viking ancestry 15x risk
  • "
    Diabetes: 20% prevalence (vs 4% general)
  • "
    PIP contractures harder to correct - operate early
  • "
    Recurrence vs extension: important distinction

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Dupuytren's contracture of right hand in 48-year-old patient complaint of contracture of right 4th finger and palpable nodules on palm.A. Transverse sonography scans shows hypoechoic nodular lesions (
Click to expand
Dupuytren's contracture of right hand in 48-year-old patient complaint of contracture of right 4th finger and palpable nodules on palm.A. Transverse sCredit: Park M et al. via Korean J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Classical presentation of Dupuytren's contracture. The most commonly affected digits are the ulnar digits (ring and small fingers). Surgery is indicated when joint contracture exceeds 30°, or when nod
Click to expand
Classical presentation of Dupuytren's contracture. The most commonly affected digits are the ulnar digits (ring and small fingers). Surgery is indicatCredit: Howard JC et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Dupuytren's contracture. Longitudinal US shows a hypoechoic nodule (arrows) arising from the superficial fascia of the palm, adjacent to the flexor tendon.
Click to expand
Dupuytren's contracture. Longitudinal US shows a hypoechoic nodule (arrows) arising from the superficial fascia of the palm, adjacent to the flexor teCredit: Teh J et al. via J Ultrason via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Dupuytren's Exam Points

Pathophysiology

Myofibroblast is the pathological cell - produces contractile force and Type III collagen. Three phases: Proliferative (nodules), Involutional (cord formation), Residual (mature contracture). TGF-beta pathway activation central to pathogenesis.

Spiral Cord Anatomy

Four components: Pretendinous band + Spiral band + Lateral digital sheet + Grayson ligament. Wraps around NV bundle displacing it central and superficial. Highest risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during dissection.

Surgical Indications

MCP contracture greater than 30 degrees OR ANY PIP contracture. Positive table-top test (Hueston). PIP contractures harder to correct - lower success than MCP. Operate earlier for PIP involvement.

Treatment Spectrum

Needle aponeurotomy: Percutaneous, fastest recovery, 60% recurrence at 5 years. Collagenase: Non-surgical enzyme injection. Limited fasciectomy: Gold standard surgery. Dermofasciectomy: With skin graft for aggressive recurrence or diathesis.

Mnemonic

DASHEDDupuytren's Risk Factors

D
Diabetes
20% prevalence in diabetics
A
Alcohol
Hepatic fibrosis association
S
Smoking
Microvascular changes
H
Hereditary/Northern European
Viking disease - 15x increased risk
E
Epilepsy (phenytoin)
Anti-epileptic medication effect
D
Disease (Peyronie, Ledderhose)
Ectopic fibromatoses

Memory Hook:DASHED factors accelerate the disease! Northern European ancestry is the strongest predictor.

Mnemonic

PSLGSpiral Cord Four Components

P
Pretendinous band
Longitudinal band in palm
S
Spiral band
From natatory ligament around NV bundle
L
Lateral digital sheet
Lateral to flexor sheath
G
Grayson ligament
Volar to NV bundle

Memory Hook:PSLG forms the Spiral cord - the most dangerous cord because it wraps around and displaces the neurovascular bundle!

Mnemonic

YBEFDupuytren's Diathesis Features

Y
Young onset
Less than 40 years
B
Bilateral disease
Both hands affected
E
Ectopic fibromatosis
Peyronie, Ledderhose, Garrod pads
F
Family history
Strong genetic component

Memory Hook:YBEF predicts aggressive disease with higher recurrence - consider dermofasciectomy earlier!

Mnemonic

NCFDTreatment Recurrence Rates - HIGH to LOW

N
Needle fasciotomy
60-80% recurrence (highest)
C
Collagenase
35-65% recurrence
F
Fasciectomy
20-40% recurrence
D
Dermofasciectomy
10-20% recurrence (lowest)

Memory Hook:NCFD: Needle worst, Dermo best for recurrence!

Mnemonic

BRUNERSurgical Approach - BRUNER

B
Bruner zigzag
Incision design across creases
R
Respect NVB
Identify before excision
U
Under loupe
Magnification essential
N
No longitudinal
Never cross crease with straight line
E
Excise diseased
Remove pathological tissue only
R
Release contracture
Achieve full extension if possible

Memory Hook:BRUNER incision, Respect NVB, Under magnification, No straight lines, Excise disease, Release contracture

Overview and Epidemiology

The Viking Disease

Dupuytren's disease has the highest prevalence in populations of Northern European/Celtic/Viking descent. Prevalence up to 30% in Norwegian men over 60 years. In Australia, reflects the strong European ancestry with prevalence around 4-5% overall.

Definition

Dupuytren's disease is a benign fibroproliferative disorder affecting the palmar and digital fascia, resulting in progressive nodule and cord formation with flexion contracture of the digits. Named after Baron Guillaume Dupuytren who described surgical treatment in 1831.

Stages of Dupuytren's disease progression
Click to expand
Three-stage illustration of Dupuytren's disease progression. Stage A: Initial palmar nodule with skin dimpling - the nodule is firm and tethered to overlying skin. Stage B: Cord development extending from the nodule along the pretendinous band toward the affected finger. Stage C: Established flexion contracture with cord tightening and fingers drawn into the palm (positive tabletop test). Understanding disease progression guides timing of intervention.Credit: Rehman S et al., Arthritis Res Ther - CC BY 4.0

Epidemiology

Population Prevalence:

  • General population: 4-6% (varies by ancestry)
  • Northern European descent: 15-30% (over age 60)
  • Australian context: 4-5% reflecting European ancestry
  • Increases dramatically with age after 50 years

Demographics:

  • Gender: Male to female ratio 7:1 in younger patients, equalizes after age 70
  • Age: Peak presentation 50-60 years, can occur younger with diathesis
  • Laterality: Right hand slightly more common, 40-60% bilateral
  • Digit distribution: Ring greater than little greater than middle greater than index greater than thumb

Associated Risk Factors (DASHED):

  • Diabetes mellitus: 20% prevalence (vs 4% general population)
  • Alcohol consumption: Dose-dependent association, hepatic fibrosis link
  • Smoking: 2-3x increased risk via microvascular effects
  • Hereditary/Northern European: Strongest predictor, autosomal dominant pattern
  • Epilepsy medications: Phenytoin, phenobarbital association
  • Disease associations: Peyronie (penile), Ledderhose (plantar), Garrod pads (knuckles)

Dupuytren's Diathesis

Describes aggressive disease phenotype with poor prognosis:

  • Young onset (less than 40 years)
  • Bilateral hand involvement
  • Ectopic fibromatoses (Peyronie, Ledderhose)
  • Strong family history
  • Radial side involvement (index, middle, thumb)
  • Dorsal Garrod pads

Diathesis patients have higher recurrence rates (up to 70% at 5 years) and may benefit from more aggressive initial surgery (dermofasciectomy).

Pathophysiology

Cellular and Molecular Basis

The Myofibroblast is the central pathological cell in Dupuytren's disease:

  • Modified fibroblast with smooth muscle-like contractile apparatus
  • Contains alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) stress fibers
  • Produces excessive Type III collagen (vs Type I in normal fascia)
  • Generates contractile force via actin-myosin interaction
  • Responds to TGF-beta and mechanical stress signals

Molecular Pathways:

  • TGF-beta signaling: Central driver of myofibroblast differentiation
  • Wnt pathway: Promotes fibroblast to myofibroblast transformation
  • Mechanical stress: Tension induces myofibroblast activation
  • Hypoxia: Local tissue hypoxia may trigger fibrogenesis
  • Free radicals: Oxidative stress in pathological tissue

Three Phase Disease Progression

Phase 1 - Proliferative:

  • Active myofibroblast proliferation
  • High cellularity with immature fibroblasts
  • Nodule formation in palm and digits
  • Type III collagen predominates
  • May be painful, progressive

Phase 2 - Involutional:

  • Myofibroblast alignment along stress lines
  • Cord formation from palmar nodules extending to digits
  • Contracture begins and progresses
  • Transition from Type III to Type I collagen
  • Less cellular, more organized collagen

Phase 3 - Residual:

  • Mature, relatively acellular cord
  • Dense Type I collagen bundles
  • Established fixed contracture
  • Minimal active disease
  • Low recurrence risk if excised

Normal Palmar Fascial Anatomy

Longitudinal Components:

  • Pretendinous bands: Four bands from palmaris longus to digits (ring and little most prominent)
  • Natatory ligament: Connects pretendinous bands distally
  • Spiral band: From natatory to lateral digital sheet

Transverse Components:

  • Transverse palmar ligament: At MCP level
  • Natatory ligament: Distal palm between web spaces

Vertical Components:

  • Septa of Legueu and Juvara: Anchor fascia to skeleton
  • Eight vertical septa create palmar compartments

Digital Fascia:

  • Lateral digital sheet: Lateral to flexor sheath
  • Grayson ligament: Volar to neurovascular bundle
  • Cleland ligament: Dorsal to neurovascular bundle (not involved in Dupuytren's)

Cord Anatomy and Types

Spiral Cord and Neurovascular Bundle

The spiral cord is the most dangerous anatomically because it displaces the neurovascular bundle central and superficial. During dissection, the NV bundle is at high risk of injury as it lies in an abnormal position. Always identify the NV bundle before dividing any cords.

Four Major Cord Types

1. Pretendinous Cord (Most Common)

  • From pretendinous band in palm
  • Extends from distal palmar crease to base of digit
  • Causes MCP joint contracture
  • Neurovascular bundle remains in normal position
  • Relatively safe to excise

2. Central Cord

  • Continuation of pretendinous cord into digit
  • Lies central in digit over flexor sheath
  • Causes PIP joint contracture
  • Neurovascular bundle in normal position
  • Common in ring and little fingers

3. Spiral Cord (Most Dangerous)

  • Four components (PSLG):
    1. Pretendinous band (palm)
    2. Spiral band (from natatory ligament)
    3. Lateral digital sheet (lateral to flexor sheath)
    4. Grayson ligament (volar to NV bundle)
  • Spirals around and displaces NV bundle centrally and superficially
  • NV bundle can be displaced up to 1cm from normal position
  • Highest risk of iatrogenic nerve injury
  • Requires careful dissection under loupe magnification

4. Lateral Cord

  • From lateral digital sheet alone
  • Causes PIP joint contracture
  • Less common than other types
  • NV bundle usually in normal position

5. Other Rare Cords:

  • Retrovascular cord: Dorsal to NV bundle (very rare)
  • Natatory cord: In web space, causes web space contracture
  • Thumb cords: First web pretendinous, proximal commissural
Anatomical diagram of normal finger fascia versus Dupuytren's disease
Click to expand
Two-panel anatomical illustration showing how Dupuytren's disease alters normal digital anatomy. Panel A: Normal finger showing Grayson's ligament, Cleland's ligament, natatory ligament, lateral digital sheet, and neurovascular bundle in their normal anatomical positions. Panel B: In Dupuytren's disease, the diseased fascial bands coalesce and displace the neurovascular bundle toward the midline - critical knowledge for safe surgical dissection, particularly with spiral cord involvement.Credit: Ketchum LD et al., Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open - CC BY 4.0
Clinical and cross-sectional anatomy of Dupuytren's cord
Click to expand
Two-panel anatomical illustration of Dupuytren's cord. Panel A: Surface view showing the palpable bow-stringed cord extending from the palm to the affected finger (DD cord label). Panel B: Cross-sectional view demonstrating the relationship of the diseased cord to skin, deep fat/connective tissue, flexor tendon, MCP joint, PIP joint, and metacarpal bone. The cord lies superficial to the flexor tendon but deep to the skin and fat pad, guiding the plane of surgical dissection.Credit: Thomas A et al., Ther Clin Risk Manag - CC BY 4.0

Cord Type Comparison

Cord TypeLocationContractureNV BundleRisk Level
PretendinousPalm to finger baseMCPNormal positionLow
CentralDigit over flexor sheathPIPNormal positionLow
SpiralWraps around NV bundleMCP and PIPCentral and superficialHIGH
LateralLateral digital sheetPIPUsually normalModerate

Classification Systems

Tubiana Classification (Most Used)

Based on total passive extension deficit (TPED) - sum of MCP, PIP, DIP contractures for each digit.

StageTotal FlexionDescriptionTreatment
Stage 00°Nodules only, no contractureObservation
Stage I0-45°Mild contractureConsider treatment if progressive
Stage II45-90°Moderate contractureSurgery indicated
Stage III90-135°Severe contractureSurgery, may need skin graft
Stage IVGreater than 135°Very severe contractureSurgery, often dermofasciectomy

Utility: Prognostic - higher stages have worse outcomes and higher recurrence.

Stages III-IV have significantly worse correction rates especially for PIP joints.

Iselin Classification (Anatomical)

Based on anatomical extent of disease:

TypeDescriptionSignificance
Type IPalmar onlyNo digital contracture yet
Type IIPalmo-digitalInvolves palm and one or more digits
Type IIIDigital onlyIsolated digital disease (less common)

Less commonly used clinically but helps describe disease distribution.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History

Chief Complaint:

  • Progressive inability to fully extend fingers
  • Difficulty placing hand flat on surfaces
  • Functional impairment: hand hygiene, glove wearing, placing hand in pocket
  • Usually painless (pain suggests active proliferative phase)

Timeline:

  • Insidious onset, progressive over months to years
  • May notice palmar nodule before contracture develops
  • Periods of rapid progression alternating with stability

Functional Impact:

  • Difficulty with fine motor tasks
  • Problems with gripping tools/objects
  • Cosmetic concerns
  • Interference with occupation

Risk Factor Assessment:

  • Ancestry (Northern European/Celtic)
  • Diabetes status and control
  • Alcohol consumption history
  • Epilepsy medication use
  • Family history of Dupuytren's
  • Bilateral hand involvement
  • Ectopic fibromatoses (Peyronie, Ledderhose, Garrod pads)
Clinical photographs showing Dupuytren disease progression from nodule to cord
Click to expand
Dupuytren disease clinical presentation: (A) Early disease with palmar nodule formation at the base of the ring finger - the characteristic firm subcutaneous nodule adherent to overlying skin. (B) Progressive disease with established cord and early flexion contracture affecting the little finger. Note the skin dimpling overlying the cord, a pathognomonic finding. Nodules may remain stable for years or progress to cord formation and contracture.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

Examination

Inspection:

  • Palmar nodules: Firm, subcutaneous, adherent to skin
  • Skin pitting: Overlying involved cords
  • Cords: Palpable longitudinal bands from palm to digits
  • Contracture: Flexion deformity at MCP and/or PIP joints
  • Digit distribution: Record which rays involved
  • Skin condition: Check for previous surgical scars, skin quality

Palpation:

  • Identify nodules and cords
  • Distinguish from flexor tendons (cords don't move with finger flexion)
  • Check consistency (hard mature cord vs soft nodule)
  • Skin adherence and pitting

Contracture Measurement:

  • MCP contracture: Measure with goniometer, record separately
  • PIP contracture: Measure separately (most important for prognosis)
  • Total passive extension deficit (TPED): Sum of all joint contractures
  • Active vs passive: Document both (rule out joint pathology)

Table-Top Test (Hueston Test):

  • Patient attempts to place palm flat on table surface
  • Positive: Cannot achieve flat palm-to-table contact
  • Indicates functionally significant contracture
  • Traditional threshold for surgical intervention

Neurovascular Assessment:

  • Digital sensation (light touch, 2-point discrimination)
  • Capillary refill and color
  • Allen test if vascular concern
  • Document baseline before any intervention

Bilateral Assessment:

  • Always examine both hands
  • 40-60% have bilateral involvement
  • May be asymmetric in severity

Diathesis Features:

  • Age at onset (less than 40 years concerning)
  • Garrod pads (dorsal PIP knuckle pads)
  • Ectopic disease: Peyronie (penile), Ledderhose (plantar)
  • Family history

Investigations

Dupuytren's is a Clinical Diagnosis

No routine investigations required. Diagnosis is clinical based on characteristic palmar nodules and cords with flexion contracture. Imaging only if diagnostic uncertainty or planning complex revision surgery.

Blood Tests

Screening for Risk Factors:

  • HbA1c or fasting glucose: Screen for diabetes if not known
  • Liver function tests: If alcohol history suggests hepatic disease
  • No specific blood test for Dupuytren's disease

Imaging

Radiographs (X-rays):

  • Not routinely indicated for primary diagnosis
  • Consider if joint pathology suspected (arthritis, previous fracture)
  • Pre-operative in severe contractures to assess joint integrity
  • Fixed PIP contracture: X-ray to check for secondary joint changes

Ultrasound:

  • High-resolution ultrasound can demonstrate:
    • Thickened palmar fascia
    • Cord identification and extent
    • Relationship to neurovascular structures
  • Mainly research tool, not routine clinical practice
  • May help distinguish Dupuytren's from other masses

MRI:

  • Rarely indicated in primary disease
  • Useful for complex cases or diagnostic uncertainty
  • Can show:
    • Full extent of fascial involvement
    • Relationship to tendons, NV bundles, joints
    • Secondary joint pathology
  • T1: Low signal cords
  • T2: Variable signal depending on cellularity/phase

Histopathology

Not required for diagnosis but if tissue obtained shows:

  • Myofibroblasts with alpha-SMA immunostaining
  • Type III collagen predominance (early)
  • Transition to Type I collagen (late)
  • Variable cellularity depending on phase
  • No malignant features (benign process)

Pre-operative Assessment

Before Surgery:

  • Document baseline contractures with goniometry
  • Photograph hand
  • Assess neurovascular status
  • X-ray if severe PIP contracture or trauma history
  • Optimize diabetes control if present
  • Smoking cessation counseling

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
dupuytren management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for dupuytrenCredit: OrthoVellum
Clinical Algorithm— Dupuytren's Disease Treatment Algorithm
Loading flowchart...

Conservative Management

Observation:

  • Indications: Nodules without contracture, minimal contracture (less than 30° MCP, no PIP)
  • Monitor progression every 6-12 months
  • Patient education about disease natural history
  • No proven method to prevent progression

Intralesional Corticosteroid Injection:

  • May reduce nodule size in early disease
  • Triamcinolone 10-40mg injected directly into nodule
  • Evidence limited to case series
  • Can cause fat pad atrophy and skin depigmentation
  • Not effective for established cords
Steroid injection treatment for Dupuytren's nodules
Click to expand
Two-panel clinical photograph demonstrating intralesional corticosteroid injection for early Dupuytren's nodules. Panel A: Pre-injection showing visible palmar nodules at the base of the ring and small fingers. Panel B: 6-month follow-up after triamcinolone injection showing flattened nodules with some skin depigmentation (a known side effect). Steroid injection may be considered for painful nodules in early disease, though it does not prevent cord development or contracture progression.Credit: Ketchum LD et al., Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open - CC BY 4.0

Radiotherapy:

  • Low-dose radiation (superficial X-ray or electron beam)
  • May slow progression in early nodular phase
  • Evidence limited, not standard of care
  • Mainly used in Europe, not widely available in Australia
  • Concerns about long-term radiation effects

Splinting:

  • No role in preventing contracture progression
  • May worsen disease via mechanical stress
  • Post-operative extension splinting has role (see post-op care)

Non-Surgical Interventional Management

Collagenase Injection (Xiaflex)

Mechanism:

  • Clostridium histolyticum collagenase
  • Enzymatic breakdown of Type I and III collagen in cord
  • Weakens cord allowing manipulation and rupture

Technique:

  • Inject 0.58mg into palpable cord
  • For MCP: Inject at distal palmar crease level
  • For PIP: Inject at base/mid-proximal phalanx
  • Patient returns next day (24-48 hours)
  • Manipulation to rupture cord under local anesthetic
  • Extension splinting for 4 months post-procedure
Collagenase injection treatment outcome for Dupuytren's contracture
Click to expand
Two-panel clinical photograph showing collagenase injection treatment for small finger Dupuytren's contracture. Panel A: Immediately after injection showing typical skin tear at the injection site - a common expected complication that heals secondarily. The skin tear occurs during cord manipulation/rupture when the overlying skin is tethered to the diseased fascia. Panel B: Result after treatment showing improved finger extension. Collagenase is an alternative to surgery for palpable cords with MCP contracture.Credit: Atroshi I et al., Acta Orthop - CC BY 4.0

Indications:

  • MCP contracture with palpable cord
  • Single joint involvement preferred
  • Patient preference for non-surgical option
  • Comorbidity precluding surgery

Contraindications:

  • Allergy to collagenase
  • Anticoagulation (relative)
  • Multiple joints in same finger (can treat sequentially)

Outcomes:

  • Success rate: 60-70% achieve less than 5° contracture
  • MCP joints: Better response than PIP
  • Recurrence: Similar to needle aponeurotomy (approximately 50% at 5 years)

Complications:

  • Skin tears (common, usually heal)
  • Bruising, swelling, pain
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Tendon rupture (rare but reported - flexor tendon)
  • Allergic reaction
  • CRPS (rare)

Australian Context:

  • TGA approved
  • PBS listed with certain restrictions
  • Cost consideration vs surgery
  • Not widely available in all centers

This treatment option is appropriate for the non-surgical patient.

Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy (NA)

Technique:

  • Percutaneous division of cord using hypodermic needle (25G)
  • Multiple passes to weaken and divide cord
  • Perform under local anesthetic in office/clinic
  • Manipulation after cord division
  • Extension splinting post-procedure

Indications:

  • Elderly patients, significant comorbidity
  • MCP contractures (better than PIP)
  • Patient preference for minimally invasive
  • Recurrent disease (can repeat)

Contraindications:

  • Spiral cord (risk of NV injury)
  • Severe PIP contracture
  • Skin condition poor
  • Anticoagulation (relative)

Advantages:

  • Office procedure
  • Rapid recovery (days not weeks)
  • Can repeat if recurs
  • Low complication rate
  • Cost-effective

Disadvantages:

  • High recurrence rate: 50-60% at 3-5 years
  • Less effective for PIP than MCP
  • Cannot address skin deficiency
  • Risk of NV injury if spiral cord
  • Skin tears possible

Outcomes:

  • Immediate correction: 80-90% achieve less than 10° extension deficit
  • Long-term: Approximately 50% recurrence at 5 years
  • Better for MCP than PIP contractures
  • Satisfaction high despite recurrence (can repeat)

Complications:

  • Skin tears (5-10%)
  • Digital nerve injury (less than 1%)
  • Tendon injury (rare)
  • Infection (rare)

Excellent option for elderly with MCP disease who want quick return to function.

Surgical Management

Limited Fasciectomy (Gold Standard)

Definition: Excision of diseased fascia only, preserving normal fascia and all vital structures.

Indications:

  • MCP contracture greater than 30 degrees
  • Any PIP contracture
  • Positive table-top test
  • Failed conservative/needle/collagenase
  • Primary surgical treatment

Pre-operative Planning:

  • Document contractures, photos
  • Discuss realistic expectations (PIP harder to correct)
  • Counsel on risks: nerve injury, recurrence, stiffness, CRPS
  • Optimize medical comorbidities
  • Smoking cessation

Surgical Technique:

Anesthesia:

  • General anesthetic or regional block (axillary)
  • Local anesthetic with adrenaline (vasoconstriction)
  • Tourniquet control

Incisions:

  • Bruner zigzag: Alternating transverse and oblique limbs
  • Midlateral: For isolated cords
  • Avoid straight longitudinal (contracture risk)
  • Extend into palm as needed
  • Z-plasties to lengthen skin if deficient

Dissection:

  1. Elevate skin flaps carefully (fascia adherent to skin)
  2. Identify diseased fascia (white, firm cords and nodules)
  3. Identify neurovascular bundles (displaced by spiral cord)
  4. Trace NV bundles proximally and distally to define safe zones
  5. Use loupe magnification for digital dissection
  6. Excise diseased fascia by careful sharp dissection
  7. Trace cords to their insertion into flexor sheath, skeleton
  8. Excise completely but preserve normal structures

Critical Structures to Preserve:

  • Digital nerves (displaced by spiral cord)
  • Digital arteries
  • Flexor tendons
  • PIP joint capsule (avoid destabilizing)
  • Normal fascial bands

Closure:

  • Leave wounds open (healing by secondary intention) OR
  • Z-plasty closure if adequate skin
  • Skin graft if skin deficient (dermofasciectomy)
  • Bulky dressing with splint in extension

Post-operative:

  • Elevate hand
  • Early finger mobilization (day 1-2)
  • Extension splinting at night for 3-6 months
  • Hand therapy essential
  • Return to normal activity 6-12 weeks

Outcomes:

  • MCP correction: 90-95% success, low recurrence
  • PIP correction: 60-80% success, higher recurrence
  • Recurrence: Approximately 30-50% at 5 years (varies by diathesis)
  • Satisfaction: 80-90% despite recurrence risk

The standard surgical treatment balancing efficacy and morbidity.

Dermofasciectomy with Skin Graft

Definition: Excision of diseased fascia AND overlying skin, with immediate full-thickness skin graft reconstruction.

Indications:

  • Recurrent disease after previous fasciectomy
  • Dupuytren's diathesis (young, bilateral, family history)
  • Severe skin involvement/pitting
  • Aim to reduce recurrence in high-risk patients

Technique:

  • Excise diseased fascia and overlying skin en bloc
  • Identify and preserve neurovascular bundles
  • Full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) from:
    • Hypothenar eminence
    • Medial arm
    • Antecubital fossa
    • Groin
  • Graft sutured into defect
  • Bolster dressing for 5-7 days (immobilize graft)

Advantages:

  • Lowest recurrence rate: 10-20% at 5 years (vs 30-50% limited fasciectomy)
  • Removes all diseased tissue including skin
  • Can address severe skin deficiency
  • Best option for young patients with diathesis

Disadvantages:

  • More extensive surgery
  • Graft harvest site morbidity
  • Longer recovery
  • Scar cosmesis
  • Graft failure risk
  • Sensory changes

Outcomes:

  • Recurrence: Significantly lower than limited fasciectomy
  • Function: Comparable to limited fasciectomy once healed
  • Satisfaction: High in appropriate patients

Complications:

  • All complications of limited fasciectomy PLUS:
  • Graft failure (5-10%)
  • Donor site issues
  • Prolonged healing
  • Color/texture mismatch

Reserve for recurrent disease or high-risk young patients with diathesis features.

Other Surgical Options

Radical Fasciectomy:

  • Excision of ALL palmar fascia (diseased and normal)
  • Historical interest only
  • High complication rate, no benefit over limited
  • Not recommended in modern practice

Amputation:

  • Ray amputation for severely contracted, non-functional digit
  • Usually little finger
  • Indications:
    • Fixed contracture with secondary joint destruction
    • Non-functional, interferes with hand function
    • Patient preference over complex reconstruction
    • Failed multiple reconstructions
  • Highly functional outcome for little finger ray amputation
  • Better than persistently contracted, painful digit

Arthrodesis:

  • PIP fusion in extension after fasciectomy
  • Salvage for severe fixed PIP contracture with joint destruction
  • Converts flexion contracture to straight, stable digit
  • Loss of PIP motion but better function than contracture

Capsulotomy:

  • Release of PIP joint capsule if joint contracture persists after fasciectomy
  • Higher risk of complications
  • Limited role in primary surgery

These procedures are for complex or salvage scenarios.

Complications

Digital Nerve Injury

Most important complication to avoid. Spiral cord displaces nerve centrally and superficially. Always identify and protect neurovascular bundles throughout dissection. Use loupe magnification. If nerve injured, repair primarily or graft if gap.

Intra-operative Complications

Neurovascular Injury:

  • Incidence: 1-5% (higher with spiral cord, revision surgery)
  • Digital nerve: Most common, spiral cord anatomy
  • Digital artery: Can occur, bleeding may be only sign
  • Prevention: Identify NV bundles, loupe magnification, gentle dissection
  • Management:
    • Nerve: Primary repair with 8-0 or 9-0 nylon, nerve graft if gap
    • Artery: Repair if possible, ligate if necessary (check perfusion)

Flexor Tendon Injury:

  • Rare (less than 1%)
  • Occurs during dissection of cords from flexor sheath
  • Repair primarily if identified

Skin Flap Necrosis:

  • Skin adherent to diseased fascia
  • Thin flaps at risk
  • Handle gently, preserve blood supply

Early Post-operative Complications (Less than 6 weeks)

Hematoma:

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Prevention: Meticulous hemostasis, tourniquet deflation before closure, pressure dressing
  • Management: Small = observation, large = evacuation

Wound Healing Problems:

  • Delayed healing: Common with open palm technique (healing by secondary intention)
  • Wound breakdown: 5-10%, especially over PIP
  • Infection: 1-2% (rare with proper technique)
  • Management: Regular dressings, hand therapy, antibiotics if infected

Skin Graft Failure (Dermofasciectomy):

  • Partial loss in 5-10%
  • Complete loss rare (less than 2%)
  • Prevention: Adequate hemostasis, secure bolster dressing, immobilization
  • Management: Allow granulation, split skin graft if needed

Late Complications (Greater than 6 weeks)

Recurrence:

  • Definition: Return of disease in previously treated area
  • Incidence:
    • Limited fasciectomy: 30-50% at 5 years
    • Needle aponeurotomy: 50-60% at 5 years
    • Dermofasciectomy: 10-20% at 5 years
  • Risk factors: Diathesis features, young age, PIP involvement
  • Management: Observation if mild, repeat intervention if symptomatic

Extension:

  • Definition: New disease in previously unaffected area
  • Different from true recurrence
  • Represents disease progression
  • Managed as primary disease

Stiffness and Loss of Motion:

  • Some loss of flexion common post-operatively
  • Active mobilization and hand therapy essential
  • Pre-operative PIP contractures may not fully correct
  • Realistic expectations important

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS):

  • Incidence: 5-10% (varies by definition)
  • Risk factors: Extensive surgery, prolonged immobilization, nerve injury
  • Prevention: Early mobilization, gentle surgery
  • Management: Hand therapy, pain management, CRPS protocols

Sensory Changes:

  • Numbness in distribution of affected nerves
  • Usually improves over 6-12 months
  • Permanent if nerve injured

Scar Contracture:

  • Can occur with inadequate skin coverage
  • Z-plasty technique reduces risk
  • Skin graft for deficiency
  • Hand therapy with scar massage

Chronic Pain:

  • Neuropathic pain if nerve injured
  • Scar tenderness common initially
  • Usually resolves over time

Complication Rates by Procedure

ComplicationNeedle AponeurotomyCollagenaseLimited FasciectomyDermofasciectomy
Nerve injuryLess than 1%Less than 1%1-5%2-6%
Recurrence (5yr)50-60%50%30-50%10-20%
InfectionRareRare1-2%2-3%
CRPSRareRare5-10%5-10%

Management of Recurrent Disease

Assessment:

  • Distinguish recurrence (same area) from extension (new area)
  • Assess severity, functional impact
  • Review previous operative notes if available
  • Consider diathesis features

Treatment Options:

  • Observation: If minimal, asymptomatic
  • Needle aponeurotomy: Can repeat, useful for recurrent MCP
  • Repeat fasciectomy: Technically challenging, higher nerve injury risk
  • Dermofasciectomy: Lower recurrence, consider in young patients
  • Amputation: Salvage for repeatedly recurrent, non-functional digit

Post-operative Care and Rehabilitation

Immediate Post-operative (0-2 weeks)

Dressing:

  • Bulky dressing with extension splint
  • Elevate hand (reduce edema)
  • Monitor neurovascular status
  • Pain control (oral analgesia usually sufficient)

Wound Care:

  • Dressing change at 2-3 days if excessive drainage
  • Leave wounds open OR remove sutures at 2 weeks
  • Open palm technique: regular dressings until healed (4-6 weeks)

Early Mobilization:

  • Start day 1-2 post-operatively
  • Active flexion exercises to prevent stiffness
  • Gentle extension (don't force)
  • Critical for outcome

Rehabilitation Phase (2-12 weeks)

Hand Therapy:

  • Essential component of treatment
  • Active range of motion exercises
  • Scar massage (once wounds healed)
  • Edema control (compression, elevation)
  • Strengthening exercises (progressive)

Splinting:

  • Extension splinting at night: 3-6 months
  • Maintains correction while healing
  • Evidence for reducing recurrence unclear but commonly practiced
  • Custom thermoplastic splint

Return to Activities:

  • Light activities: 2-4 weeks
  • Heavy activities: 6-12 weeks
  • Individualize based on occupation, healing

Long-term Follow-up

Monitoring:

  • 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-op
  • Assess range of motion, scar, function
  • Monitor for recurrence (distinguish from extension)
  • Patient education about recurrence risk

Outcomes:

  • Full outcome assessment at 12 months
  • MCP contractures: Excellent correction, low recurrence
  • PIP contractures: More variable correction, higher recurrence
  • Patient satisfaction generally high despite recurrence risk

Evidence Base

Level I (RCT)
📚 CORD I (Hurst et al)
Key Findings:
  • Collagenase vs placebo for Dupuytren's contracture
  • 64% of collagenase patients achieved less than 5° residual contracture
  • Effective for MCP and PIP joints
  • Established collagenase as viable non-surgical option
Clinical Implication: Collagenase injection is an effective treatment for Dupuytren's contracture, particularly in patients preferring non-surgical management or with contraindications to surgery.
Source: N Engl J Med 2009;361:968-979

Level I (RCT)
📚 van Rijssen et al
Key Findings:
  • 5-year RCT: Needle aponeurotomy vs limited fasciectomy
  • NA: Faster recovery, higher recurrence (85% vs 21%)
  • Fasciectomy: Better long-term correction, more complications
  • Both effective depending on patient priorities
Clinical Implication: Needle aponeurotomy offers rapid recovery with higher recurrence; limited fasciectomy provides more durable correction. Treatment choice depends on patient age, comorbidity, and preference.
Source: Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:469-477

Level V (Expert Opinion)
📚 McFarlane (Classic Anatomical Description)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive description of Dupuytren's cord anatomy
  • Detailed spiral cord anatomy and NV displacement
  • Surgical approach based on anatomical understanding
  • Foundation for modern safe dissection technique
Clinical Implication: Understanding McFarlane's anatomical descriptions is essential for safe surgery, particularly identification of the spiral cord and displaced neurovascular structures.
Source: Hand Clin 1990;6:365-375

Level IV (Case Series)
📚 Hueston (Dermofasciectomy Technique)
Key Findings:
  • Dermofasciectomy with skin graft for Dupuytren's
  • Recurrence rate 10-15% vs 50% limited fasciectomy
  • Particularly effective in diathesis patients
  • Established technique for aggressive disease
Clinical Implication: Dermofasciectomy with skin grafting significantly reduces recurrence in high-risk patients with Dupuytren's diathesis and should be considered in young patients with aggressive disease.
Source: Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:224-229

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Primary Dupuytren's Contracture

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old man of Scottish ancestry presents with progressive ring finger contracture over 2 years. On examination, he has 40° MCP and 30° PIP contracture with palpable cords. Positive table-top test. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a 58-year-old man with Dupuytren's disease affecting the ring finger with significant MCP and PIP contractures meeting surgical criteria. I would take a systematic approach. First, my assessment would include full history focusing on functional impact, occupation, hand dominance, and risk factors including diabetes, alcohol use, epilepsy medications, and family history. I would examine both hands documenting contractures precisely with goniometry, identify palmar and digital cords, assess for diathesis features, and perform neurovascular examination. The surgical indications are met as he has MCP greater than 30 degrees and PIP involvement. I would counsel him about treatment options: needle aponeurotomy has fastest recovery but 50-60% recurrence at 5 years; collagenase injection is non-surgical but similar recurrence; limited fasciectomy is the gold standard with 30-50% recurrence; dermofasciectomy with skin graft has lowest recurrence but is more extensive. For this primary presentation, I would recommend limited fasciectomy with Bruner incision, excising diseased fascia while carefully identifying and protecting the neurovascular bundle which may be displaced by a spiral cord. I would counsel about realistic expectations - MCP correction is excellent but PIP may not fully correct, recurrence is possible, and nerve injury is a small but important risk. Post-operatively, early mobilization and night extension splinting for 3-6 months with hand therapy are essential.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Surgical criteria met: MCP greater than 30° AND PIP contracture
Spiral cord anatomy critical - NV bundle displaced centrally and superficially
Limited fasciectomy is gold standard for primary disease
PIP contractures harder to correct than MCP
Post-op: Early mobilization, night splinting, hand therapy essential
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing precise surgical indications (30° MCP or ANY PIP)
✗Forgetting to assess for diathesis features
✗Not mentioning spiral cord and NV injury risk
✗Unrealistic expectations about PIP correction
✗Confusing recurrence rates between procedures
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the spiral cord and why is it dangerous?"
"What are the features of Dupuytren's diathesis?"
"What would you do if you injured the digital nerve?"
"How would you manage recurrent disease?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Dupuytren's Diathesis

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents with bilateral Dupuytren's affecting multiple digits. He has a strong family history and Peyronie's disease. What features make this case high-risk and how does this influence management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This case demonstrates Dupuytren's diathesis, which predicts aggressive disease with poor prognosis. The diathesis features present are young onset (less than 40 years), bilateral involvement, ectopic fibromatosis (Peyronie's disease), and strong family history. These patients have significantly higher recurrence rates after standard surgery - up to 70% at 5 years compared to 30-50% for non-diathesis patients. This influences management in several ways. First, I would counsel extensively about the high recurrence risk with any treatment. Second, I would consider more aggressive initial surgery - specifically dermofasciectomy with full-thickness skin graft rather than limited fasciectomy, as this reduces recurrence to 10-20%. Third, I would involve the patient in shared decision-making about timing of surgery versus observation, as he will likely need multiple procedures over his lifetime. Fourth, I would ensure meticulous technique with loupe magnification as these patients often require revision surgery with scarring and altered anatomy increasing nerve injury risk. Finally, I would arrange long-term follow-up as disease progression and recurrence are expected. The presence of Peyronie's disease indicates the systemic nature of his fibroproliferative disorder.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diathesis features (YBEF): Young onset, Bilateral, Ectopic fibromatosis, Family history
Recurrence rate up to 70% in diathesis patients
Consider dermofasciectomy for lower recurrence (10-20%)
Shared decision-making essential - lifetime of procedures likely
Long-term follow-up mandatory
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing diathesis features
✗Offering standard limited fasciectomy without discussing recurrence risk
✗Not mentioning dermofasciectomy option
✗Unrealistic expectations about cure
✗Not addressing systemic nature (Peyronie's)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the recurrence rate after dermofasciectomy?"
"What other ectopic fibromatoses are associated with Dupuytren's?"
"Would you operate on his other hand if asymptomatic?"
"What is the genetic basis of Dupuytren's disease?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 3: Recurrent Dupuytren's

EXAMINER

"A 62-year-old man had limited fasciectomy 3 years ago for ring finger Dupuytren's. He now has 35° recurrent MCP contracture in the same finger. Discuss management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is recurrent Dupuytren's disease defined as return of contracture in a previously treated area, occurring in 30-50% after limited fasciectomy. My approach would be: First, confirm true recurrence rather than extension to new areas - review previous operative notes to identify what was excised. Second, assess severity and functional impact - is the 35° MCP contracture interfering with function or is it mainly cosmetic concern? Third, examine carefully for scarring, skin quality, and neurovascular status as revision surgery carries higher nerve injury risk. Fourth, discuss treatment options: observation if minimal functional impact; needle aponeurotomy which can be repeated with low morbidity though 50-60% will recur again; revision limited fasciectomy which is technically challenging due to scarring and altered anatomy with 2-6% nerve injury risk; or dermofasciectomy with full-thickness skin graft which has lowest recurrence (10-20%) but is most extensive. For this patient with isolated MCP recurrence, I would offer needle aponeurotomy as first-line given low morbidity and ability to repeat, or revision fasciectomy if he prefers more durable correction. If he had diathesis features or this was a second recurrence, I would strongly consider dermofasciectomy. I would counsel that recurrence is part of the disease's natural history and doesn't represent surgical failure.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recurrence vs extension - distinguish by reviewing previous surgery
Recurrent surgery has higher nerve injury risk (scarring, altered anatomy)
Needle aponeurotomy reasonable for recurrent MCP (low morbidity, repeatable)
Dermofasciectomy for multiple recurrences or diathesis
Recurrence is disease biology, not surgical failure
COMMON TRAPS
✗Immediately offering surgery without assessing severity
✗Not reviewing previous operative notes
✗Underestimating nerve injury risk in revision surgery
✗Not considering needle aponeurotomy
✗Not mentioning dermofasciectomy for definitive treatment
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the nerve injury risk in revision fasciectomy?"
"How would you identify the digital nerve in scarred tissue?"
"Would you consider amputation for repeatedly recurrent disease?"
"What is the dermofasciectomy technique?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pathological Cell

Q: What is the pathological cell in Dupuytren's disease and what does it produce? A: Myofibroblast - modified fibroblast with contractile apparatus containing alpha-smooth muscle actin. Produces excessive Type III collagen in early phases, transitioning to Type I in mature disease. Generates contractile force via actin-myosin interaction.

Surgical Indications

Q: What are the surgical indications for Dupuytren's disease? A: MCP contracture greater than 30 degrees OR ANY PIP contracture OR Positive table-top test. PIP contractures are harder to correct so intervene earlier. This is the most commonly tested point about Dupuytren's.

Spiral Cord Anatomy

Q: What makes the spiral cord dangerous and what are its four components? A: The spiral cord displaces the neurovascular bundle central and superficial creating high risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. Four components (PSLG): Pretendinous band, Spiral band, Lateral digital sheet, Grayson ligament. Always identify NV bundle before dividing cords.

Recurrence Rates

Q: What are the recurrence rates for different Dupuytren's treatments at 5 years? A: Needle aponeurotomy: 50-60%; Collagenase: approximately 50%; Limited fasciectomy: 30-50%; Dermofasciectomy: 10-20%. Lower recurrence comes at cost of greater surgical morbidity.

Diathesis Features

Q: What are the features of Dupuytren's diathesis and why do they matter? A: YBEF: Young onset (less than 40), Bilateral disease, Ectopic fibromatosis (Peyronie, Ledderhose, Garrod pads), Family history. These patients have recurrence rates up to 70% and may benefit from dermofasciectomy for lower recurrence.

Australian Context

Dupuytren's disease is common in Australia given the significant population of Northern European ancestry. Prevalence estimated at 4-5% overall, increasing to 15-20% in men over 60 of Celtic/Scandinavian descent.

Collagenase (Xiapex) is not PBS listed in Australia and is available through private prescription at a cost of approximately $1,500-2,000 per injection with limited availability.

Treatment Access:

  • Limited fasciectomy is standard surgical management, widely available in public and private sectors
  • Hand therapy services essential for optimal outcomes
  • Needle aponeurotomy increasingly performed in specialized hand clinics

Clinical Practice:

  • Most patients managed through hand surgery clinics
  • Multidisciplinary approach with hand therapists
  • Dermofasciectomy available in specialized hand centers
  • Revision surgery often referred to high-volume hand surgeons

Workers' Compensation:

  • Not typically work-related
  • Occupational vibration exposure may be contributory factor
  • Generally considered constitutional disease

Epidemiology:

  • Strong correlation with European ancestry patterns in Australian demographics
  • Diabetes prevalence in Australia (approximately 5% population) contributes to Dupuytren's burden
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have much lower prevalence (African ancestry protective)

DUPUYTREN'S DISEASE

High-Yield Exam Summary

Pathophysiology Essentials

  • •Myofibroblast = pathological cell (alpha-SMA positive)
  • •Type III collagen predominates (early), transitions to Type I (late)
  • •3 phases: Proliferative → Involutional → Residual
  • •TGF-beta pathway central to pathogenesis
  • •Ring and little fingers most affected (ulnar predominance)

Spiral Cord Anatomy (PSLG)

  • •P = Pretendinous band (palm)
  • •S = Spiral band (from natatory ligament)
  • •L = Lateral digital sheet
  • •G = Grayson ligament (volar to NV bundle)
  • •Displaces NV bundle CENTRAL and SUPERFICIAL
  • •Highest risk of iatrogenic nerve injury

Surgical Indications (30-ANY)

  • •MCP contracture greater than 30 degrees
  • •ANY PIP contracture (harder to correct, operate earlier)
  • •Positive table-top test (Hueston)
  • •Progressive disease with functional limitation

Treatment Options and Recurrence

  • •Needle aponeurotomy: 50-60% recurrence at 5y
  • •Collagenase injection: ~50% recurrence at 5y
  • •Limited fasciectomy: 30-50% recurrence at 5y (gold standard)
  • •Dermofasciectomy + skin graft: 10-20% recurrence at 5y

Diathesis Features (YBEF)

  • •Y = Young onset (less than 40 years)
  • •B = Bilateral hand involvement
  • •E = Ectopic fibromatosis (Peyronie, Ledderhose, Garrod)
  • •F = Family history (autosomal dominant pattern)
  • •Predicts 70% recurrence - consider dermofasciectomy

Risk Factors (DASHED)

  • •D = Diabetes (20% prevalence)
  • •A = Alcohol (dose-dependent)
  • •S = Smoking (2-3x risk)
  • •H = Hereditary/Northern European (15x risk)
  • •E = Epilepsy medications (phenytoin)
  • •D = Disease associations (Peyronie, Ledderhose)

Key Complications to Know

  • •Digital nerve injury: 1-5% (higher with spiral cord)
  • •Recurrence: Most common long-term issue
  • •CRPS: 5-10% (early mobilization reduces risk)
  • •PIP contractures: Harder to correct than MCP
  • •Distinguish recurrence (same area) from extension (new area)

Post-operative Essentials

  • •Early mobilization from day 1-2 (critical)
  • •Night extension splinting for 3-6 months
  • •Hand therapy mandatory for optimal outcome
  • •MCP correction: 90-95% success
  • •PIP correction: 60-80% success (more variable)
Quick Stats
Reading Time121 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand