Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Elbow Arthritis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Elbow Arthritis

Comprehensive guide to elbow osteoarthritis including post-traumatic etiology, rheumatoid arthritis, conservative management, surgical options, and outcomes

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

ELBOW ARTHRITIS

Post-traumatic vs Inflammatory | Conservative First | TEA for End-Stage | Ulnar Nerve

RAPrimary inflammatory cause
Post-traumaticCommon after fractures
90%TEA 10-yr survival RA
10-15%Ulnar nerve complications

ELBOW ARTHRITIS TYPES

Rheumatoid Arthritis
PatternInflammatory, bilateral, systemic
TreatmentMedical management, TEA if failed
Post-traumatic
PatternAfter fractures, dislocations, instability
TreatmentConservative, debridement, TEA
Primary OA
PatternRare, usually manual laborers
TreatmentConservative, debridement
Hemophilic
PatternBleeding arthropathy
TreatmentFactor replacement, synovectomy, TEA

Critical Must-Knows

  • RA is most common inflammatory cause - bilateral involvement, systemic disease
  • Post-traumatic follows fractures, dislocations, or chronic instability
  • Conservative management first - NSAIDs, injections, activity modification
  • TEA indicated when conservative fails, age over 60, low demand
  • Ulnar nerve commonly affected - cubital tunnel syndrome in 30-50%

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    RA elbow arthritis: bilateral, systemic, medical management first
  • "
    Post-traumatic: history of fracture/dislocation, may have instability
  • "
    TEA best outcomes in RA (90% 10-year survival) vs trauma (75%)
  • "
    Ulnar nerve must be assessed and protected in all elbow procedures
Lateral X-ray of elbow showing osteoarthritis with osteophytes
Click to expand
Lateral elbow radiograph demonstrating advanced osteoarthritis with osteophytes at the olecranon fossa and coronoid process. Joint space narrowing and articular surface irregularity are characteristic findings of elbow OA.Credit: Biswas D et al., Arthritis 2013 (PMC3678412) - CC-BY

Critical Elbow Arthritis Exam Points

RA vs Post-traumatic

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common inflammatory cause, typically bilateral with systemic features. Post-traumatic follows fractures, dislocations, or chronic instability. Always assess for instability and ulnar nerve involvement.

Conservative First

Medical management is first-line for RA (DMARDs, biologics). Activity modification and injections for post-traumatic. Surgery reserved for failed conservative management in appropriate patients.

TEA Indications

Total elbow arthroplasty indicated when conservative fails, age over 60, low demand. RA patients have best outcomes (90% 10-year survival). Trauma patients have higher failure rates (75% 10-year survival).

Ulnar Nerve

Ulnar nerve commonly affected in elbow arthritis (30-50% cubital tunnel syndrome). Must assess preoperatively and protect during surgery. Nerve complications occur in 10-15% of TEA procedures.

Quick Decision Guide - Elbow Arthritis Management

Patient ScenarioEtiologyTreatmentKey Consideration
RA, bilateral, age 65, failed medical managementInflammatory (RA)TEA both sides (staged)Best outcomes - 90% 10-year survival
Post-traumatic, age 55, moderate symptomsPost-traumatic OAConservative, debridement if neededTEA too young - wait until over 60 if possible
Post-traumatic, age 75, unreconstructible fractureAcute fracturePrimary TEA75% 10-year survival, faster rehab than ORIF
Young, high demand, post-traumaticPost-traumatic OAAvoid TEA, consider interposition or fusionTEA contraindicated - high failure risk
Mnemonic

RAPIDElbow Arthritis Causes

R
Rheumatoid arthritis
Most common inflammatory cause, bilateral
A
After trauma
Post-traumatic after fractures, dislocations
P
Primary OA
Rare, usually manual laborers
I
Instability chronic
Recurrent dislocations, ligament deficiency
D
Degenerative
Hemophilic, crystalline, neuropathic

Memory Hook:RAPID progression of elbow arthritis - RA and post-traumatic are most common.

Mnemonic

FRAILTEA Indications

F
Failed conservative
Medical management, injections, activity modification
R
Rheumatoid arthritis
Primary indication, best outcomes
A
Age over 60
Lower demand, better outcomes
I
Inflammatory arthropathy
RA, SLE, psoriatic arthritis
L
Low demand
Weight restrictions: under 5 kg single, under 2 kg repetitive

Memory Hook:FRAIL patients are ideal for TEA - elderly, low demand, inflammatory causes.

Mnemonic

CUBITALUlnar Nerve Assessment

C
Cubital tunnel
Posterior to medial epicondyle
U
Ulnar nerve
30-50% affected in elbow arthritis
B
Before surgery
Must assess preoperatively
I
Identify early
Protect during approach
T
Transposition
May be needed if symptomatic
A
Avoid injury
10-15% complication rate
L
Loss of function
Sensory and motor deficits

Memory Hook:CUBITAL tunnel syndrome is common - assess and protect the ulnar nerve.

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition: Elbow arthritis encompasses inflammatory and degenerative conditions affecting the elbow joint, leading to pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. Unlike hip and knee arthritis where primary osteoarthritis predominates, elbow arthritis is most commonly post-traumatic or inflammatory (rheumatoid arthritis).

Epidemiology:

  • Prevalence: Less than 1% of population (much less common than hip/knee)
  • Primary OA: Rare, usually in manual laborers with repetitive stress
  • RA: Most common inflammatory cause, typically bilateral
  • Post-traumatic: Common after fractures, dislocations, or chronic instability
  • Age: Peak 50-70 years
  • Gender: RA more common in females, post-traumatic equal distribution

Clinical Significance: Elbow arthritis significantly impacts activities of daily living including eating, personal hygiene, and work. Unlike lower extremity arthritis, elbow involvement affects both dominant and non-dominant arms, with bilateral RA causing severe functional impairment.

Why Elbow Arthritis is Different

Elbow arthritis differs from hip/knee arthritis: primary OA is rare (usually post-traumatic or inflammatory), the joint tolerates less cartilage loss before symptoms, and treatment options are more limited. TEA is less common than hip/knee replacement due to higher complication rates and stricter patient selection criteria.

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Elbow Joint Anatomy:

Three Articulations:

  • Ulnohumeral joint: Primary hinge (flexion-extension 0-150°)
  • Radiocapitellar joint: Valgus stability, load transmission
  • Proximal radioulnar joint: Forearm rotation (pronation-supination)

Stabilizing Structures:

  • Medial collateral ligament (MCL): Primary valgus stabilizer
  • Lateral collateral ligament (LCL): Primary varus stabilizer
  • Capsule: Anterior and posterior capsular constraints
  • Muscles: Dynamic stabilizers (biceps, triceps, brachialis)

Pathophysiology:

Rheumatoid Arthritis:

  • Synovial inflammation → cartilage destruction
  • Pannus formation erodes articular surfaces
  • Ligamentous laxity → instability
  • Bilateral involvement common

Post-traumatic:

  • Cartilage damage from initial injury
  • Malalignment → abnormal load distribution
  • Instability → recurrent trauma
  • Osteochondral defects → progressive degeneration

Primary OA:

  • Rare, usually manual laborers
  • Repetitive stress → cartilage wear
  • Loose bodies common
  • Usually unilateral

Classification Systems

Classification by Cause

Type I: Inflammatory

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (most common)
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • Features: Bilateral, systemic, synovial inflammation

Type II: Post-traumatic

  • After fractures (distal humerus, radial head, olecranon)
  • After dislocations (simple or complex)
  • Chronic instability
  • Features: Unilateral, history of trauma, may have malalignment

Type III: Primary Degenerative

  • Primary osteoarthritis (rare)
  • Hemophilic arthropathy
  • Neuropathic (Charcot)
  • Features: Usually unilateral, specific risk factors

Understanding etiology guides treatment approach and predicts outcomes.

Modified Outerbridge Classification (Elbow)

Grade 0: Normal joint Grade I: Softening, swelling of cartilage Grade II: Fragmentation and fissuring (under 1.5cm) Grade III: Fragmentation and fissuring (over 1.5cm) Grade IV: Erosion to subchondral bone

Clinical Correlation:

  • Grade I-II: Conservative management
  • Grade III: Consider debridement
  • Grade IV: Consider TEA if symptomatic

Radiographic staging helps guide treatment decisions and predict outcomes.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Pain: Location, character, timing (activity-related vs rest)
  • Stiffness: Loss of flexion-extension, pronation-supination
  • Instability: Feeling of giving way, recurrent dislocations
  • Trauma history: Previous fractures, dislocations
  • Systemic symptoms: RA features (morning stiffness, bilateral, systemic)

Physical Examination:

Inspection:

  • Swelling, deformity, scars
  • Muscle atrophy (especially triceps)
  • Carrying angle (cubitus valgus/varus)

Palpation:

  • Joint line tenderness
  • Ulnar nerve (cubital tunnel)
  • Loose bodies
  • Synovial thickening (RA)

Range of Motion:

  • Flexion-extension: Normal 0-150°, functional arc 30-130°
  • Pronation-supination: Normal 80° each direction
  • Stiffness pattern: Capsular vs mechanical block

Special Tests:

  • Valgus stress: MCL integrity
  • Varus stress: LCL integrity
  • Tinel's sign: Ulnar nerve at cubital tunnel
  • Instability: Apprehension, pivot shift

Neurological Assessment:

  • Ulnar nerve: Sensation (ulnar 1.5 digits), motor (interossei, FDP)
  • Median nerve: Sensation, motor (thenar muscles)
  • Radial nerve: Sensation, motor (wrist/finger extension)

Investigations

Plain Radiographs:

  • AP and lateral views: Joint space narrowing, osteophytes, loose bodies
  • Stress views: Instability assessment
  • Comparison views: Contralateral elbow for reference

CT Scan:

  • 3D reconstruction: Bone stock assessment, version analysis
  • Loose body detection: More sensitive than X-ray
  • Preoperative planning: For TEA or debridement

MRI:

  • Cartilage assessment: Early changes, osteochondral defects
  • Synovial evaluation: RA pannus, synovitis
  • Ligament integrity: MCL, LCL assessment
  • Ulnar nerve: Cubital tunnel evaluation

Laboratory Studies:

  • RA workup: RF, anti-CCP, ESR, CRP
  • Infection markers: If concern for septic arthritis
  • Bone health: If considering TEA

Electrodiagnostic Studies:

  • EMG/NCS: Ulnar nerve function if symptomatic
  • Brachial plexus: If neurological symptoms

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Elbow Arthritis Treatment Algorithm - Illustrated medical sketchnote style
Click to expand
Treatment decision flowchart for elbow arthritis showing conservative vs surgical management pathway.Credit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Decision Framework

The key decision is conservative vs surgical management. Conservative management is first-line for all patients. Surgery (debridement, TEA) is reserved for failed conservative management in appropriate patients (age over 60, low demand for TEA).

First-Line Treatment

Medical Management (RA):

  • DMARDs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine)
  • Biologics (anti-TNF, anti-IL6)
  • Corticosteroids (oral or intra-articular)
  • Continue until pain uncontrolled or function severely limited

Non-Pharmacological:

  • Activity modification
  • Physiotherapy (maintain ROM, strengthen)
  • Bracing (elbow brace for support)
  • Weight management

Injections:

  • Corticosteroid injection (temporary relief, 3-6 months)
  • Hyaluronic acid (limited evidence)
  • Maximum 2-3 lifetime injections

Expected Outcomes:

  • RA: 60-70% achieve adequate control with medical management
  • Post-traumatic: 40-50% improve with conservative measures
  • Primary OA: 50-60% respond to conservative treatment

Conservative management should be exhausted before considering surgery.

Surgical Treatment Indications

Arthroscopic Debridement:

  • Loose body removal
  • Osteophyte excision
  • Capsular release for stiffness
  • Indication: Mechanical symptoms, early disease
  • Outcomes: 60-70% improvement, temporary

Open Debridement:

  • Outerbridge procedure
  • Radial head excision if arthritic
  • Capsular release
  • Indication: Advanced disease, need for extensive debridement

Total Elbow Arthroplasty:

  • Semi-constrained linked hinge
  • Indication: Failed conservative, age over 60, low demand
  • Outcomes: 90% 10-year survival (RA), 75% (trauma)
AP and lateral X-rays showing total elbow arthroplasty
Click to expand
AP and lateral radiographs demonstrating total elbow arthroplasty with a linked semi-constrained prosthesis. The humeral and ulnar components are cemented in place, with satisfactory alignment and joint articulation.Credit: Biswas D et al., Arthritis 2013 (PMC3678412) - CC-BY

Interposition Arthroplasty:

  • Fascia lata, allograft
  • Indication: Young patients, avoid TEA
  • Outcomes: Variable, limited evidence
AP and lateral X-rays showing radial head arthroplasty at 19 months follow-up
Click to expand
AP and lateral elbow radiographs 19 months after radial head arthroplasty. The metallic radial head prosthesis demonstrates satisfactory position with minor radiolucency around the stem, which is commonly observed but typically non-progressive.Credit: Moghaddam A et al., Trauma Mon 2016 (PMC4869438) - CC-BY

Surgical options depend on patient age, demand, and disease severity.

Surgical Technique

Arthroscopic Elbow Debridement

Indications:

  • Loose bodies
  • Osteophytes causing impingement
  • Early arthritis with mechanical symptoms
  • Capsular contracture

Technique:

  • Standard arthroscopic portals (anteromedial, anterolateral, posterolateral)
  • Remove loose bodies
  • Debride osteophytes (coronoid, olecranon)
  • Capsular release if stiff
  • Radial head excision if arthritic

Outcomes:

  • 60-70% improvement
  • Temporary benefit (2-5 years)
  • May delay need for TEA

Arthroscopic debridement provides temporary relief and may delay definitive surgery.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Indications:

  • Failed conservative management
  • Age over 60 (preferred)
  • Low demand (under 5 kg single lift, under 2 kg repetitive)
  • End-stage arthritis

Contraindications:

  • Active infection
  • Young age under 60 (relative)
  • High demand
  • Poor bone stock (absolute)
  • Non-compliant patient

Technique:

  • Posterior approach (triceps-reflecting or -sparing)
  • Identify and protect ulnar nerve
  • Prepare humerus and ulna
  • Cement components
  • Repair triceps

Outcomes:

  • RA: 90% 10-year survival, 90% pain relief
  • Trauma: 75% 10-year survival, 85% pain relief
  • Functional arc: 30-130° flexion

TEA provides reliable pain relief and functional improvement in appropriate patients.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Ulnar nerve injury10-15% (TEA)Cubital tunnel disease, previous surgery, transpositionObservation if neuropraxia, exploration if transection, may need transposition
Aseptic loosening15% at 10 yearsHigh demand, trauma indication, young ageRevision TEA with longer stems, bone graft
Triceps insufficiency5-10%Triceps-reflecting approach, inadequate repairExtension lag, may need revision repair or tendon transfer
Infection2-3%Previous surgery, RA, immunosuppressionDebridement, antibiotics, may need explant
Instability2-4%Unlinked designs, ligament deficiencyRevision to linked design or ligament reconstruction
Heterotopic ossification5-10%Trauma history, extensive dissectionProphylaxis with indomethacin, may need excision

Ulnar Nerve Complications

Ulnar nerve complications occur in 10-15% of TEA procedures. The nerve must be identified and protected at the start of surgery. Transposition is not always required and may increase complications. If symptomatic preoperatively, transposition should be considered. Postoperative neuropraxia usually resolves but may be permanent.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Total Elbow Arthroplasty Rehabilitation

Immediate (0-48 hours):

  • Splint at 90° flexion
  • Elevation to reduce swelling
  • Pain control
  • Ulnar nerve monitoring

Early (2-6 weeks):

  • Remove splint at 2 weeks
  • Gentle passive motion (avoid forced extension)
  • Active-assisted motion
  • No active extension until 6 weeks (protect triceps)

Intermediate (6-12 weeks):

  • Active extension strengthening
  • Progressive ROM exercises
  • Light activities (under 2 kg)
  • Return to ADLs

Long-term:

  • Lifelong weight restrictions (under 5 kg single, under 2 kg repetitive)
  • Avoid impact activities
  • Regular follow-up for loosening

Proper rehabilitation optimizes outcomes and prevents complications.

Arthroscopic Debridement Rehabilitation

Early (0-2 weeks):

  • Sling for comfort
  • Early motion to prevent stiffness
  • Ice and elevation

Intermediate (2-6 weeks):

  • Progressive ROM
  • Strengthening
  • Return to activities

Long-term:

  • Maintain ROM
  • Activity modification if needed
  • May need repeat debridement or TEA

Debridement rehabilitation is less restrictive than TEA.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Conservative Management Outcomes:

  • RA: 60-70% achieve adequate control with medical management
  • Post-traumatic: 40-50% improve with conservative measures
  • Duration: Variable, may delay surgery for years

Surgical Outcomes:

Arthroscopic Debridement:

  • Improvement: 60-70% of patients
  • Duration: 2-5 years of benefit
  • May delay: Need for TEA

Total Elbow Arthroplasty:

  • RA patients: 90% 10-year survival, 90% pain relief, 100° functional arc
  • Trauma patients: 75% 10-year survival, 85% pain relief
  • Satisfaction: 85-90% satisfied at 10 years
  • Functional: 30-130° flexion arc for ADLs

Long-term Considerations:

  • Aseptic loosening: Most common long-term failure (15% at 10 years)
  • Revision: 15% revision rate at 10 years
  • Weight restrictions: Lifelong (under 5 kg single, under 2 kg repetitive)

Predictors of Success

Good outcomes are associated with: RA etiology (better than trauma), age over 60, low demand, compliant with restrictions, and optimal surgical technique. Poor outcomes are associated with: young age, high demand, trauma indication, non-compliance, and complications.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

Total Elbow Arthroplasty Outcomes

Level IV
Little et al • JBJS Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • RA patients: 90% 10-year survival with semi-constrained TEA
  • Trauma patients: 75% 10-year survival
  • Aseptic loosening most common failure (15% at 10 years)
  • Ulnar nerve complications in 10-15%
Clinical Implication: TEA provides reliable outcomes in RA patients, but trauma patients have higher failure rates.

Conservative Management RA

Level I
Smolen et al • Ann Rheum Dis (2017)
Key Findings:
  • DMARDs and biologics control RA effectively
  • 60-70% achieve adequate elbow control without surgery
  • Early aggressive treatment prevents joint destruction
Clinical Implication: Medical management should be optimized before considering TEA in RA patients.

Arthroscopic Debridement

Level IV
Kelly et al • Arthroscopy (2001)
Key Findings:
  • 60-70% improvement in symptoms
  • Temporary benefit (2-5 years)
  • May delay need for TEA in young patients
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic debridement provides temporary relief and may delay definitive surgery.

Ulnar Nerve in Elbow Arthritis

Level IV
O'Driscoll et al • JBJS Am (1991)
Key Findings:
  • 30-50% of elbow arthritis patients have cubital tunnel syndrome
  • Must assess preoperatively
  • Transposition not always required but consider if symptomatic
Clinical Implication: Ulnar nerve assessment and protection are critical in all elbow procedures.

TEA in Trauma

Level III
McKee et al • JBJS Am (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Primary TEA for unreconstructible distal humerus fractures in elderly
  • 75% 10-year survival vs 90% in RA
  • Faster rehabilitation than ORIF
  • Higher complication rate than RA patients
Clinical Implication: TEA is viable option for elderly trauma patients but has higher failure rates than RA.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: RA vs Post-traumatic (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 65-year-old patient presents with bilateral elbow pain and stiffness. Examination shows synovial thickening, limited ROM, and ulnar nerve symptoms. How do you differentiate between rheumatoid arthritis and post-traumatic arthritis, and what is your management approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation with bilateral involvement and synovial thickening is highly suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis rather than post-traumatic arthritis. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would take a detailed history focusing on systemic symptoms (morning stiffness, other joint involvement, RA features) and trauma history. Second, I would examine both elbows and other joints for symmetrical involvement typical of RA. Third, I would investigate with serological tests (RF, anti-CCP, ESR, CRP) and imaging (X-rays of both elbows, hands, feet for RA pattern). Fourth, if RA is confirmed, my management would be medical optimization first (DMARDs, biologics) before considering surgery. If medical management fails and patient is appropriate (age over 60, low demand), I would consider total elbow arthroplasty. I would counsel about TEA outcomes (90% 10-year survival in RA), weight restrictions, and the need for bilateral procedures. For post-traumatic arthritis, the approach would be different - usually unilateral, history of trauma, and may respond better to conservative measures or debridement.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bilateral involvement suggests RA rather than post-traumatic
Synovial thickening is characteristic of inflammatory arthritis
Medical management first for RA before considering surgery
TEA outcomes better in RA (90%) than trauma (75%)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not considering RA in bilateral elbow arthritis
✗Rushing to surgery without medical management trial
✗Not assessing ulnar nerve in all elbow arthritis patients
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you manage bilateral RA elbow arthritis?"
"What are the indications for TEA in RA?"
"How does management differ for post-traumatic arthritis?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: TEA Indications and Technique (~3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old patient with rheumatoid arthritis presents with severe elbow pain and stiffness despite optimal medical management. Walk me through your decision-making for total elbow arthroplasty, including patient selection, surgical approach, and key technical points."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient is an appropriate candidate for total elbow arthroplasty given age over 60, failed medical management, and low demand. My decision-making: First, I would confirm RA diagnosis and ensure medical management has been optimized. Second, I would assess patient factors: age (72 is ideal), demand level (must accept weight restrictions), bone stock (adequate for fixation), and compliance. Third, I would discuss alternatives: continued medical management, arthroscopic debridement (temporary), or TEA (definitive). Fourth, if proceeding with TEA, my surgical approach would be posterior triceps-reflecting approach. Key technical points: identify and protect ulnar nerve first (vessel loop), prepare humerus and ulna surfaces, cement humeral component first then ulnar, assemble hinge last, and repair triceps meticulously with transosseous tunnels. Postoperatively, I would immobilize at 90° for 48 hours, then begin gentle motion protecting triceps repair for 6 weeks. I would counsel about lifelong weight restrictions (under 5 kg single lift, under 2 kg repetitive) and expected outcomes (90% 10-year survival, 90% pain relief, 100° functional arc).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Patient selection: age over 60, low demand, failed conservative
Ulnar nerve protection is critical first step
Triceps repair must be secure (5-10% failure rate)
Lifelong weight restrictions essential
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not protecting ulnar nerve early in procedure
✗Inadequate triceps repair leading to extension lag
✗Not discussing weight restrictions preoperatively
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient is 55 years old?"
"How do you protect the ulnar nerve?"
"What are the weight restrictions and why?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Ulnar Nerve Complication (~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A patient presents 3 months after total elbow arthroplasty with numbness and weakness in the ulnar distribution. How do you assess and manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for ulnar nerve injury after TEA. My management: First, I would assess the nerve function clinically - sensory distribution (ulnar 1.5 digits), motor function (interossei, FDP to ring and small finger), and Tinel's sign at cubital tunnel. Second, I would investigate with EMG/NCS at 6-12 weeks to assess nerve function and determine if neuropraxia (temporary) or axonal injury (permanent). Third, I would review the operative report to understand if nerve was transposed and how it was handled. Fourth, my management depends on findings: if neuropraxia (most common), I would observe for 3-6 months as most recover. If no recovery by 6 months, I would consider exploration and possible transposition. If transection was identified, I would consider early exploration and repair. Fifth, I would counsel the patient about likely recovery timeline and potential permanent deficits. Prevention is key - identify and protect the nerve at the start of surgery, avoid aggressive retraction, and consider transposition if nerve is symptomatic preoperatively.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Ulnar nerve complications occur in 10-15% of TEA
Most are neuropraxias that recover with observation
EMG/NCS helps determine prognosis
Exploration if no recovery by 6 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to surgery without observation period
✗Not investigating with EMG/NCS
✗Missing that most neuropraxias recover
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When would you explore the nerve?"
"What is the recovery timeline for neuropraxia?"
"How do you prevent ulnar nerve injury?"

MCQ Practice Points

Etiology Question

Q: What is the most common cause of inflammatory elbow arthritis? A: Rheumatoid arthritis. Unlike hip and knee where primary OA predominates, elbow arthritis is most commonly inflammatory (RA) or post-traumatic. Primary OA of the elbow is rare.

Treatment Question

Q: What is the first-line treatment for rheumatoid elbow arthritis? A: Medical management with DMARDs and biologics. Surgery (TEA) is reserved for failed medical management in appropriate patients (age over 60, low demand).

Surgical Technique Question

Q: What is the 10-year survival rate of total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A: 90% 10-year survival in RA patients. This is better than trauma patients (75% 10-year survival). RA is the primary indication with best outcomes.

Complications Question

Q: What is the most common complication after total elbow arthroplasty? A: Ulnar nerve complications occur in 10-15% of procedures. Most are neuropraxias that recover, but some may be permanent. The nerve must be identified and protected at the start of surgery.

Indications Question

Q: What are the weight restrictions after total elbow arthroplasty? A: Lifelong restrictions: under 5 kg for single lift, under 2 kg for repetitive activities. These restrictions are essential to prevent aseptic loosening, which is the most common long-term failure (15% at 10 years).

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Practice Patterns

  • Elbow arthritis less common than hip/knee (under 1% prevalence)
  • RA management follows Australian Rheumatology Association guidelines
  • TEA performed in major centers (1-2 per year per surgeon)
  • Medical management optimized before surgical referral

Medicolegal Considerations

  • Informed consent: Must discuss weight restrictions extensively
  • Ulnar nerve: High risk of complications - must document assessment and protection
  • Alternatives: Must discuss conservative management and debridement before TEA
  • Outcomes: RA vs trauma outcomes differ - must counsel appropriately

Medicolegal Risk Factors

Key documentation requirements:

  • Preoperative ulnar nerve assessment and documentation
  • Discussion of weight restrictions and patient acceptance
  • Alternative treatments discussed (conservative, debridement)
  • RA vs trauma outcome differences explained
  • Informed consent for lifelong restrictions

Common litigation issues:

  • Ulnar nerve injury without proper documentation of protection
  • Aseptic loosening in non-compliant patients
  • Failure to discuss alternatives
  • Inadequate informed consent for restrictions

Proper documentation and comprehensive informed consent minimize medicolegal risk.

Elbow Arthritis

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Etiology

  • •RA: most common inflammatory, bilateral, systemic
  • •Post-traumatic: after fractures/dislocations, unilateral
  • •Primary OA: rare, manual laborers
  • •Hemophilic: bleeding arthropathy

Management Algorithm

  • •Conservative first: medical management (RA), activity modification, injections
  • •Surgical: debridement (temporary), TEA (definitive)
  • •TEA indications: failed conservative, age over 60, low demand
  • •Weight restrictions: under 5 kg single, under 2 kg repetitive (lifelong)

TEA Outcomes

  • •RA: 90% 10-year survival, 90% pain relief
  • •Trauma: 75% 10-year survival, 85% pain relief
  • •Functional arc: 30-130° flexion for ADLs
  • •Aseptic loosening: 15% at 10 years (most common failure)

Ulnar Nerve

  • •30-50% of elbow arthritis patients have cubital tunnel syndrome
  • •Must assess preoperatively in all cases
  • •10-15% complication rate in TEA
  • •Protect at start of surgery, transposition if symptomatic
Quick Stats
Reading Time76 min
Related Topics

Ankle Arthrodesis

Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head

Hip Arthrodesis

Knee Arthrodesis