Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Kienböck's Disease

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Kienböck's Disease

Comprehensive guide to Kienböck's disease including staging, pathophysiology, investigation with MRI, and treatment options from immobilization to salvage procedures.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

KIENBÖCK'S DISEASE

Avascular Necrosis of Lunate | Progressive Wrist Arthritis | Ulnar Variance Key

20-40Peak age (years)
2:1Male predominance
78%Negative ulnar variance
Stage IIIB+Poor prognosis

Lichtman Staging (Modified)

Stage I
PatternNormal X-ray, MRI shows AVN
TreatmentImmobilization or observation
Stage II
PatternSclerosis on X-ray, lunate intact
TreatmentJoint leveling, revascularization
Stage IIIA
PatternCollapse without scaphoid rotation
TreatmentJoint leveling if viable
Stage IIIB
PatternCollapse WITH scaphoid rotation
TreatmentSalvage: PRC or fusion
Stage IV
PatternGeneralized wrist arthritis
TreatmentFusion or wrist arthroplasty

Critical Must-Knows

  • Negative Ulnar Variance: Present in 78% - ulna shorter than radius increases lunate loading
  • Lichtman Stage IIIB: Scaphoid rotation = critical prognostic divider - salvage surgery required
  • MRI Gold Standard: Detects Stage I disease before X-ray changes appear
  • Joint Leveling: Radial shortening or ulnar lengthening for Stage II-IIIA with negative variance
  • PRC: Proximal row carpectomy - motion-preserving salvage for Stage IIIB-IV without arthritis

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Negative ulnar variance = lunate takes excessive load
  • "
    Stage IIIB (scaphoid rotation) = point of no return
  • "
    MRI shows bone marrow edema before X-ray changes
  • "
    Radial shortening decreases lunate loading by 45%

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

(A) MRI, T2-weighted image. (B) MRI arthrogram, T 1-weighted image. (C) CT arthrogram.
Click to expand
(A) MRI, T2-weighted image. (B) MRI arthrogram, T 1-weighted image. (C) CT arthrogram.Credit: Kulhawik D et al. via Pol J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
The Ni–Ti memory alloy scapho-trapezio-trapezoeid arthrodesis concentrator (top view).
Click to expand
The Ni–Ti memory alloy scapho-trapezio-trapezoeid arthrodesis concentrator (top view).Credit: Xu Y et al. via Medicine (Baltimore) via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Intraoperative view of the Ni–Ti memory alloy concentrator after insertion into the scaphoid, trapezium, and trapezoid.
Click to expand
Intraoperative view of the Ni–Ti memory alloy concentrator after insertion into the scaphoid, trapezium, and trapezoid.Credit: Xu Y et al. via Medicine (Baltimore) via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Kienböck's Disease Exam Points

Staging is Treatment

Lichtman Stage IIIB is the critical divider. Scaphoid rotation indicates lunate collapse severe enough to destabilize the carpus. Stages I-IIIA may benefit from joint leveling; IIIB-IV require salvage procedures.

Ulnar Variance Matters

Negative ulnar variance in 78% of cases. Ulna 2-4mm shorter than radius increases lunate loading. Radial shortening osteotomy decreases lunate force by 45%.

MRI for Early Diagnosis

Stage I disease is MRI-only. Bone marrow edema and low T1 signal precede X-ray sclerosis by months. Early detection may allow non-operative treatment.

Salvage Options

PRC vs Fusion trade-offs. Proximal row carpectomy preserves 50% motion but requires intact capitolunate articulation. Fusion eliminates motion but relieves pain reliably.

Quick Decision Guide

StageX-ray FindingsTreatmentKey Pearl
INormal X-ray, MRI positiveImmobilization 3-6 monthsMay arrest progression if caught early
IISclerosis, no collapseRadial shortening or revascularizationJoint leveling decreases lunate loading
IIIACollapse, NO scaphoid rotationConsider joint leveling if lunate viableLast chance for joint-preserving surgery
IIIBCollapse WITH scaphoid rotationPRC or limited fusionScaphoid rotation = carpal instability
IVGeneralized arthritisTotal wrist fusion or arthroplastyEnd-stage disease
Mnemonic

I See Carpal ArthritisLichtman Staging Progression

I
Intact
Normal X-ray, MRI shows AVN
S
Sclerosis
Stage II - density increased on X-ray
C
Collapse
Stage IIIA/B - lunate height loss
A
Arthritis
Stage IV - degenerative changes throughout wrist

Memory Hook:I See Carpal Arthritis = the natural progression of untreated Kienböck's disease from invisible to end-stage!

Mnemonic

LUNATERisk Factors for Kienböck's Disease

L
Loading (repetitive)
Repetitive wrist use, manual labor
U
Ulnar variance (negative)
Short ulna = excess lunate load
N
Necrosis risk anatomy
Single vessel supply to lunate
A
Autoimmune/steroids
Corticosteroids, SLE, vasculitis
T
Trauma history
Prior wrist fracture or injury
E
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism, diabetes

Memory Hook:LUNATE = the bone that dies! Remember the risk factors that predispose to AVN.

Mnemonic

PRC-FSalvage Surgery Options

P
Proximal row carpectomy
Remove scaphoid-lunate-triquetrum, preserve motion
R
Radiolunate fusion
Fuse radius to lunate, preserve some motion
C
Capitolunate fusion
Fuse capitate to lunate
F
Four-corner fusion
Fuse capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrum, excise scaphoid

Memory Hook:PRC-F = Proximal Row and Carpal Fusions - the salvage spectrum from motion-preserving to stable fusion!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why Kienböck's Matters

Kienböck's disease is a rare but disabling condition affecting young, active patients. Understanding staging and treatment algorithms is essential for hand surgery exams and clinical practice.

Kienböck's Disease is avascular necrosis (AVN) of the lunate bone, leading to progressive collapse, carpal instability, and wrist arthritis.

Demographics

  • Age: 20-40 years (peak incidence)
  • Gender: Male predominance 2:1
  • Occupation: Manual laborers, athletes
  • Bilateral: Rare (less than 5%)

Typically affects dominant hand of young workers.

Natural History

  • Early (I-II): May stabilize with treatment
  • Mid (IIIA): Progressive collapse likely
  • Advanced (IIIB-IV): Irreversible arthritis
  • Timeline: Years to decades of progression

Early diagnosis is critical to prevent collapse.

Pathophysiology and Etiology

Lunate Vascular Anatomy

The lunate has tenuous blood supply with two main patterns: Type I (Y-pattern from radial and ulnar arteries, 80%) and Type II (single vessel, 20%). Interruption leads to AVN, particularly in Type II anatomy.

Etiology is multifactorial:

Risk Factors

  1. Negative Ulnar Variance (78% of cases)

    • Ulna 2-4mm shorter than radius
    • Increases lunate loading by transmitting more force
    • Present in normal population at only 23%
  2. Repetitive Microtrauma

    • Manual labor, jackhammer use
    • Gymnastics, racquet sports
    • Cumulative stress to lunate
  3. Vascular Anatomy

    • Single vessel supply (Type II) at higher risk
    • Intraosseous anastomoses limited
    • Watershed areas vulnerable
  4. Systemic Associations

    • Corticosteroid use
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus
    • Gout, sickle cell disease
    • Hypothyroidism

Pathophysiology Cascade:

  1. Vascular insult or repetitive trauma
  2. Ischemia and bone marrow edema
  3. Osteocyte death and sclerosis
  4. Structural collapse of lunate
  5. Scaphoid rotation and carpal instability
  6. Progressive radiocarpal and midcarpal arthritis

Biomechanics of Negative Variance

Negative ulnar variance increases lunate loading. In a neutral wrist, 60% of axial load transmits through radius and 40% through ulna. With 2mm negative variance, lunate bears 95% of radiocarpal load.

Radial shortening osteotomy redistributes load to ulna.

Collapse Mechanism

AVN weakens subchondral bone. Repeated loading causes microfractures, progressive height loss, and eventual fragmentation. Once collapse begins (Stage III), progression is difficult to arrest.

Early intervention aims to prevent collapse.

Classification Systems

Lichtman Classification (Modified 2010)

The gold standard staging system, based on radiographic appearance and treatment implications.

StageRadiographic FindingsLunate StatusTreatment Approach
INormal X-ray; MRI shows AVNStructurally intactImmobilization, observation
IISclerosis on X-rayIntact, no collapseJoint leveling, revascularization
IIIACollapse, no scaphoid rotationCollapsed, some viabilityJoint leveling if viable, or PRC
IIIBCollapse WITH scaphoid rotationCollapsed, carpal instabilityPRC, partial fusion
IVGeneralized carpal arthritisFragmented, arthriticTotal wrist fusion or arthroplasty

Stage IIIB is the critical prognostic divider: scaphoid rotation indicates fixed carpal collapse beyond salvage with joint-preserving techniques.

Staging determines treatment strategy and prognosis.

Bain-Begg Classification

MRI-based staging for early disease detection.

StageMRI FindingsClinical Correlation
1NormalNo AVN
2Bone marrow edema onlyReversible ischemia
3Subchondral fractureEarly AVN
4Lunate collapseEstablished collapse
5Carpal arthritisEnd-stage

More sensitive than Lichtman for detecting early disease (Stages 2-3) before X-ray changes.

MRI staging guides early intervention decisions.

Stahl Classification

Vascular pattern classification based on angiography.

  • Type A: Y-pattern, vessels from radial and ulnar arteries (80%)
  • Type B: Single vessel supply (20%) - higher AVN risk

Anatomical classification explains individual susceptibility.

Type B anatomy predisposes to AVN with any vascular insult.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain: Dorsal wrist pain, worse with activity
  • Weakness: Grip strength reduced 30-50%
  • Stiffness: Progressive loss of motion
  • Occupation: Manual labor, repetitive wrist use
  • Trauma: History of wrist injury in 30%
  • Dominant hand: Usually affected

Insidious onset over months is typical.

Examination

  • Inspection: Dorsal swelling over lunate
  • Palpation: Tenderness over lunate fossa
  • ROM: Decreased flexion and extension (50% of normal)
  • Strength: Grip weakness (30-50% reduction)
  • Provocative: Pain with axial loading of 3rd metacarpal
  • Watson test: May be positive (scaphoid instability)

Physical findings are non-specific; imaging confirms diagnosis.

Clinical Findings by Stage

StagePainMotion LossGrip Strength
I-IIMild, activity-relatedMinimal (10-20%)Near normal
IIIAModerate, constantModerate (30-50%)Reduced 30-40%
IIIB-IVSevere, rest painSevere (over 50%)Reduced over 50%

Differential Diagnosis

Consider: Scapholunate ligament injury, triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear, ulnocarpal impaction, carpal boss, occult fracture. MRI differentiates AVN from ligamentous pathology.

Investigations

Investigation Protocol

First LinePlain Radiographs

PA, lateral, and clenched-fist views. Look for: lunate sclerosis (Stage II), collapse with decreased height (Stage III), scaphoid rotation on lateral (IIIB), carpal arthritis (IV). Measure ulnar variance on neutral rotation PA view.

Gold StandardMRI

T1 and T2 sequences. T1 shows low signal (bone marrow replacement), T2 shows variable signal depending on stage. Detects Stage I disease before X-ray changes. Also assesses lunate viability and cartilage integrity.

AdvancedCT Scan

For surgical planning. Defines extent of collapse, fracture lines, and articular involvement. Useful before salvage procedures to assess capitate head (for PRC) or plan fusion surfaces.

OptionalBone Scan

Rarely used. Increased uptake in lunate. Less specific than MRI. Historical interest; MRI has replaced it.

Key Radiographic Measurements

MeasurementTechniqueNormal ValueKienböck's Finding
Ulnar variancePA view, neutral rotation, difference in radial-ulnar heights0 to +2mmNegative variance in 78%
Carpal height ratioLateral view, capitate to radius distance / lunate to 3rd MC length0.54 ± 0.03Decreased in Stage III+
Scapholunate angleLateral view, angle between scaphoid and lunate30-60 degreesOver 60° in Stage IIIB (DISI)

Radiographic Stages

Stage I: Normal X-ray (diagnosis requires MRI)

Stage II: Increased density (sclerosis) of lunate, normal shape and height

Stage IIIA: Lunate collapse with height loss, scapholunate angle normal (less than 60°)

Stage IIIB: Lunate collapse PLUS scaphoid rotation - scapholunate angle over 60° (DISI pattern)

Stage IV: Generalized carpal arthritis - radiocarpal, midcarpal, or both

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
kienbocks disease management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for kienbocks diseaseCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management

Indications: Stage I disease, patient refuses surgery, medical comorbidities

Conservative Treatment Steps

First LineImmobilization

Short-arm cast or splint for 3-6 months. Aim is to unload lunate and allow revascularization. Success rate 30-50% in Stage I. Monitor with serial MRI every 3-4 months.

AdjunctsActivity Modification

Avoid heavy manual work. Reduce impact loading. Ergonomic assessment. Consider job modification or retraining.

MedicalPharmacologic Adjuncts

Bisphosphonates (experimental). Limited evidence. Iloprost (prostacyclin analog) may improve vascularity. NSAIDs for pain control.

Outcomes: Conservative treatment rarely effective beyond Stage I. Progression common without surgical intervention.

Conservative management is temporizing in most cases.

Joint Leveling Procedures

Indications: Stage II-IIIA with negative ulnar variance, viable lunate

Radial Shortening Osteotomy

Most common joint leveling procedure.

  • Biomechanics: Shortens radius 2-4mm, decreases lunate loading by 45%, redistributes load to ulnocarpal joint
  • Technique: Distal radius osteotomy, remove bone wedge, plate fixation
  • Outcomes: Pain relief 60-80%, may slow progression, works best in Stage II
  • Complications: Nonunion (5%), radial shortening greater than planned, DRUJ symptoms

Ulnar Lengthening

  • Alternative approach: Lengthen ulna instead of shorten radius
  • Advantage: Preserves radial length
  • Disadvantage: Ulnar nonunion risk higher, DRUJ stiffness

Joint leveling aims to unload lunate before irreversible collapse.

Revascularization Procedures

Indications: Stage II-IIIA, particularly in young patients, viable lunate on MRI

Vascularized Bone Grafts

4+5 ECA Pedicle Graft (most common):

  • Source: Dorsal distal radius based on 4th and 5th extensor compartment artery (4+5 ECA)
  • Technique: Harvest vascularized bone from distal radius, inset into drilled lunate core
  • Outcomes: Pain relief 70%, may restore lunate vascularity, best in Stage II
  • Evidence: Moderate quality, success rates vary 40-80%

Other Options:

  • Pisiform vascularized graft
  • Medial femoral condyle free flap (microsurgery)

Revascularization is technically demanding with variable results.

Salvage Procedures

Indications: Stage IIIB-IV, failed joint-preserving surgery, painful wrist

Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC)

Motion-preserving salvage for Stage IIIB without arthritis.

  • Technique: Excise scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum; create capitolunate articulation
  • Requirements: Intact capitate head cartilage, no radiocarpal arthritis
  • Outcomes: Pain relief 80%, preserves 50% wrist motion, grip strength 70% of normal
  • Durability: Good 10-year results, eventual arthritis in 20%

Four-Corner Fusion

  • Technique: Fuse capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrum, excise scaphoid
  • Outcomes: Reliable pain relief, preserves 50% motion
  • Complications: Nonunion 5-10%, hardware prominence

Total Wrist Fusion

  • Indication: Stage IV with generalized arthritis, salvage of failed PRC/fusion
  • Technique: Fuse radius-carpus-metacarpals, plate fixation
  • Outcomes: Excellent pain relief, no motion, strong grip
  • Functional loss: Significant ADL limitations

Wrist Arthroplasty

  • Indication: Low-demand patients, bilateral disease (preserve one wrist motion)
  • Outcomes: Preserves motion but loosening/instability risk
  • Limited role: Young, high-demand Kienböck's patients not ideal

Salvage surgery trades motion for pain relief and stability.

Treatment Algorithm by Lichtman Stage

StagePreferred TreatmentAlternativeOutcomes
IImmobilization 3-6 monthsObservation50% arrest progression
IIRadial shortening (if -UV)Revascularization60-80% pain relief
IIIAJoint leveling or revascularizationConsider PRCVariable, 40-70% success
IIIBPRC or four-corner fusionSTT fusion80% pain relief, limited motion
IVTotal wrist fusionWrist arthroplasty (selected)Excellent pain relief, no motion

Surgical Technique

Radial Shortening Osteotomy

Surgical Steps

1Positioning and Approach

Supine, arm table, tourniquet. Volar approach to distal radius: longitudinal incision between FCR and radial artery. Protect superficial radial nerve branches.

2Exposure

Retract FCR ulnarly, radial artery radially. Expose pronator quadratus and incise longitudinally. Subperiosteal elevation of distal radius.

3Osteotomy

Mark osteotomy 2-3cm proximal to radial articular surface. Perform transverse osteotomy with oscillating saw. Remove 2-4mm bone wedge (based on pre-op ulnar variance measurement). Shorten radius.

4Fixation

Compress osteotomy and apply dorsal locking plate. Ensure stable fixation. Check DRUJ stability and rotation.

5Closure

Repair pronator quadratus (protects plate). Skin closure, splint in neutral.

Technical Pearls:

  • Pre-op planning: measure exact ulnar variance and plan shortening amount
  • Avoid excessive shortening (over 4mm) - causes DRUJ symptoms
  • Compress osteotomy fully to minimize nonunion risk
  • Use locking plate for secure fixation in osteopenic bone

Pitfalls:

  • Inadequate shortening - fails to unload lunate
  • Excessive shortening - DRUJ pain and stiffness
  • Nonunion if inadequate fixation or bone contact

Radial shortening decreases lunate loading biomechanically.

4+5 ECA Vascularized Bone Graft

Surgical Steps

1Dorsal Approach

Dorsal longitudinal incision over lunate. Raise skin flaps, identify extensor retinaculum.

2Harvest Pedicle Graft

Raise 4th extensor compartment (EDC to ring/small). Identify 4+5 extensor compartment artery (branch of anterior interosseous artery). Harvest corticoperiosteal graft from distal radius based on 4+5 ECA pedicle.

3Lunate Core Decompression

Expose lunate, create dorsal window. Curette necrotic bone. Create cavity for graft inset.

4Graft Inset

Rotate vascularized graft into lunate cavity on pedicle. Secure with K-wires or small screws. Preserve vascular pedicle.

5Closure

Close capsule, retinaculum, skin. Splint for 6 weeks.

Technical Pearls:

  • Preserve 4+5 ECA pedicle carefully - very small vessel
  • Adequate debridement of necrotic lunate bone
  • Secure graft fixation without pedicle compression
  • Consider combining with joint leveling for negative UV

Outcomes: Variable success, best in Stage II with MRI evidence of viability.

Revascularization is technically challenging with mixed results.

Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC)

Surgical Steps

1Dorsal Approach

Dorsal longitudinal incision centered over carpus. Retract EPL radially, EDC ulnarly. Capsulotomy preserving dorsal radiocarpal ligaments if possible.

2Scaphoid Excision

Excise scaphoid. Divide radial attachments, deliver scaphoid dorsally, excise completely. Preserve radial styloid.

3Lunate and Triquetrum Excision

Remove lunate and triquetrum. Protect ulnar neurovascular bundle. Ensure complete excision - retained fragments cause impingement.

4Inspect Articulation

Assess capitate head and lunate fossa of radius. Must have intact cartilage for PRC to succeed. Any arthritis is contraindication - consider fusion instead.

5Closure

Repair capsule loosely (avoid overtightening). Skin closure, splint in neutral.

Key Requirements:

  • Intact capitate head cartilage (assess pre-op on CT/MRI)
  • Intact lunate fossa cartilage (radiocarpal joint)
  • No midcarpal arthritis

Contraindications to PRC:

  • Capitate head arthritis
  • Radiocarpal arthritis
  • Inflammatory arthritis

Outcomes: 80% good pain relief, 50% wrist motion preserved, durable 10+ years.

PRC is the workhorse salvage for Stage IIIB without arthritis.

Complications

Complications by Treatment

TreatmentEarly ComplicationsLate ComplicationsManagement
Radial shorteningInfection, CRPSNonunion (5%), DRUJ painBone graft, revision fixation
RevascularizationPedicle injury, hematomaGraft failure, lunate collapseConsider salvage procedure
PRCStiffness, CRPSCapitate-radius arthritis (20% at 10 years)Convert to fusion
Four-corner fusionNonunion (5-10%), hardware irritationAdjacent joint arthritisHardware removal, convert to total fusion

General Complications

Progression of Disease (untreated):

  • Stage I to IV over 3-10 years
  • Inevitable without intervention in most cases
  • Collapse and arthritis are endpoint

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS):

  • Occurs after 2-5% of wrist surgeries
  • Risk factors: female, prolonged immobilization
  • Prevention: early motion, vitamin C supplementation
  • Management: multidisciplinary pain team

Stiffness:

  • Common after any wrist surgery
  • Worse with prolonged immobilization
  • Prevention: early therapy, limit casting to 6 weeks max

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol by Procedure

Radial ShorteningWeeks 0-6

Short-arm splint. Finger and elbow ROM immediately. X-ray at 2, 6 weeks to assess union.

Radial ShorteningWeeks 6-12

Wean splint, begin wrist ROM. Therapy for strengthening. Full activities at 12 weeks if healed.

RevascularizationWeeks 0-6

Short-arm cast. Strict immobilization to allow graft incorporation. No motion.

RevascularizationWeeks 6-12

Removable splint, begin ROM. Protected strengthening. Full activities 12-16 weeks.

PRCWeeks 0-2

Bulky dressing. Finger ROM immediately. Wound check, transition to removable splint at 2 weeks.

PRCWeeks 2-6

Removable splint, begin wrist ROM at week 3. Early motion prevents stiffness. Strengthen grip.

PRCWeeks 6-12

Wean splint, progressive strengthening. Return to normal activities by 3 months.

Return to Work:

  • Desk work: 2-4 weeks (depending on procedure)
  • Light manual work: 8-12 weeks
  • Heavy manual labor: 12-16 weeks or job modification

Long-term Monitoring:

  • Annual X-rays for first 3 years to detect progression
  • MRI if symptoms worsen or new pain
  • Salvage planning if joint-preserving procedure fails

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes by Treatment

TreatmentPain ReliefMotion PreservationDurability
Conservative (Stage I)50% improvementMaintained if stableVariable, monitoring needed
Radial shortening (Stage II)60-80% good outcomeMaintainedGood 5-10 years
Revascularization (Stage II-IIIA)40-70% improvementMaintained if successfulVariable, graft-dependent
PRC (Stage IIIB)80% good pain relief50% motion vs normalDurable 10+ years
Four-corner fusion (Stage IIIB-IV)85% pain relief40-50% motionGood 5-10 years
Total fusion (Stage IV)95% pain relief0% motionExcellent long-term

Prognostic Factors:

FactorBetter OutcomeWorse Outcome
Stage at diagnosisI-IIIIIB-IV
AgeUnder 30Over 50
OccupationSedentaryHeavy manual labor
Ulnar varianceNegative (correctable)Neutral/positive

Natural History (Untreated):

  • Stage I: 50% progress to Stage II within 2 years
  • Stage II: 80% progress to Stage III within 3-5 years
  • Stage IIIB: 100% progress to Stage IV without treatment
  • Timeline: Variable, 3-15 years from onset to end-stage

Early diagnosis and intervention improve outcomes substantially.

Evidence Base

Systematic Review
📚 Lutsky et al
Key Findings:
  • Review of radial shortening for Kienböck's disease
  • 60-80% good outcomes in Stage II-IIIA
  • Best results with negative ulnar variance
  • Decreases lunate loading by 45%
Clinical Implication: Radial shortening is effective for early-stage disease with negative ulnar variance.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2012

Cohort Study
📚 Moran et al
Key Findings:
  • PRC for Stage IIIB-IV Kienböck's disease
  • 80% pain relief, 50% motion preservation
  • Good 10-year durability
  • Capitate-radius arthritis in 20% at 10 years
Clinical Implication: PRC provides durable motion-preserving salvage for advanced disease.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2006

Cohort Study
📚 Bain and Begg
Key Findings:
  • MRI classification of Kienböck's disease
  • Detects AVN before X-ray changes (Stage I)
  • Bone marrow edema precedes sclerosis
  • Guides early intervention
Clinical Implication: MRI is essential for early diagnosis and staging.
Source: Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006

Classification Study
📚 Lichtman et al
Key Findings:
  • Modified Lichtman classification (4 stages)
  • Stage IIIB (scaphoid rotation) = critical divider
  • Guides treatment algorithm
  • Widely accepted staging system
Clinical Implication: Lichtman staging is the gold standard for treatment decisions.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2010

Cohort Study
📚 Kalb et al
Key Findings:
  • 4+5 ECA vascularized bone graft for Kienböck's
  • Variable outcomes: 40-80% success
  • Best results in Stage II with viable lunate on MRI
  • Technically demanding procedure
Clinical Implication: Vascularized grafts have variable success; reserved for young patients with early disease.
Source: Plast Reconstr Surg 1998

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Early Kienböck's Disease

EXAMINER

"A 32-year-old male manual laborer presents with 6 months of wrist pain. X-rays show lunate sclerosis with no collapse. MRI confirms AVN with intact lunate architecture. Ulnar variance is negative 3mm."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Lichtman Stage II Kienböck's disease - lunate sclerosis without collapse. The key finding is negative ulnar variance of 3mm, which predisposes to excessive lunate loading. Given the patient's young age, manual occupation, and Stage II disease, I would recommend radial shortening osteotomy to unload the lunate and potentially arrest progression. This involves shortening the radius by 3-4mm to achieve neutral or slightly positive ulnar variance, redistributing load to the ulnocarpal articulation and decreasing lunate stress by approximately 45%. Alternative options include vascularized bone grafting, though results are variable. I would counsel that without treatment, progression to collapse (Stage III) is likely, with 60-80% success rate for radial shortening in halting disease at this stage.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stage II = sclerosis without collapse = window for joint-preserving surgery
Negative ulnar variance = key modifiable risk factor
Radial shortening decreases lunate loading biomechanically
Alternative is vascularized grafting but variable results
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending conservative management for Stage II - progression is likely
✗Missing the negative ulnar variance measurement
✗Not counseling about progression risk without treatment
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform radial shortening osteotomy?"
"What are the biomechanics of ulnar variance?"
"What is the 4+5 ECA vascularized graft?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Advanced Kienböck's with Scaphoid Rotation

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old presents with chronic wrist pain and stiffness. X-rays show lunate collapse with scapholunate angle of 70 degrees. CT shows intact capitate head cartilage. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Lichtman Stage IIIB Kienböck's disease - the critical finding is the scapholunate angle of 70 degrees, indicating scaphoid rotation and DISI deformity. This signifies fixed carpal collapse and instability beyond the scope of joint-leveling procedures. Given the intact capitate head cartilage on CT, I would recommend proximal row carpectomy as the best salvage option. This involves excising the scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum, creating a new articulation between the capitate head and lunate fossa of the radius. PRC preserves approximately 50% of wrist motion while providing 80% pain relief. The key requirement is intact articular cartilage at both the capitate head and radiocarpal joint. Alternative would be four-corner fusion, which provides similar pain relief but potentially less motion. I would counsel that without treatment, progression to generalized wrist arthritis (Stage IV) is inevitable.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stage IIIB = scaphoid rotation = critical prognostic divider
Scapholunate angle over 60° indicates DISI and carpal instability
PRC requires intact capitate head and radiocarpal cartilage
PRC provides motion-preserving salvage vs fusion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting joint leveling for Stage IIIB - scaphoid rotation indicates this has failed
✗Recommending PRC without assessing cartilage integrity
✗Not recognizing Stage IIIB as the 'point of no return'
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform proximal row carpectomy?"
"What are contraindications to PRC?"
"What is four-corner fusion?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Stage I Kienböck's - Management Debate

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old woman has wrist pain for 3 months. X-rays are normal but MRI shows low T1 signal in the lunate with bone marrow edema. Ulnar variance is neutral. How do you manage this Stage I disease, and what does the evidence say about early intervention?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Lichtman Stage I Kienböck's disease - MRI-positive with normal radiographs. This represents the earliest detectable stage. Management is controversial as evidence is limited. Conservative options include immobilization for 3-6 months with serial MRI monitoring to assess progression or stabilization; approximately 50% may arrest at this stage with rest alone. However, given the patient's young age and neutral ulnar variance (not protective), there is argument for early surgical intervention. Options would include radial shortening to create positive ulnar variance (prophylactic unloading) or vascularized bone grafting to enhance lunate vascularity before structural damage occurs. The challenge is that we cannot predict which Stage I cases will progress versus stabilize. My approach would be shared decision-making: offer conservative management with close MRI surveillance every 3-4 months, progressing to surgery if MRI shows worsening (increased edema, subchondral fracture) or symptoms persist. I would counsel that progression to Stage II occurs in approximately 50% within 2 years without intervention.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stage I = MRI-only disease = earliest detection
Conservative management may succeed in 50% but requires close monitoring
Neutral ulnar variance = no protective factor
Prophylactic surgery is controversial - cannot predict who will progress
Serial MRI guides decision-making
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending observation without serial imaging - may miss progression
✗Rushing to surgery for Stage I without trial of conservative management
✗Not counseling about uncertainty in Stage I prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What MRI findings indicate progression?"
"Would you consider prophylactic radial shortening?"
"What is the natural history of untreated Stage I?"

MCQ Practice Points

Most Important Prognostic Factor

Q: What Lichtman stage represents the critical prognostic divider in Kienböck's disease? A: Stage IIIB - scaphoid rotation (scapholunate angle over 60°) indicates fixed carpal collapse and instability. Joint-preserving surgery (leveling, revascularization) is ineffective beyond this point; salvage procedures required.

Ulnar Variance Significance

Q: What percentage of Kienböck's disease patients have negative ulnar variance? A: 78% - compared to 23% in the general population. Negative variance increases lunate loading by shifting axial load away from the ulnocarpal joint.

Gold Standard Investigation

Q: What is the investigation of choice for detecting Stage I Kienböck's disease? A: MRI - detects bone marrow edema and low T1 signal before radiographic changes appear. X-rays are normal in Stage I.

Radial Shortening Biomechanics

Q: By what percentage does radial shortening osteotomy decrease lunate loading? A: 45% - shortening the radius 2-4mm redistributes axial load from radiocarpal (lunate) to ulnocarpal articulation, unloading the lunate.

PRC Requirements

Q: What are the key requirements for successful proximal row carpectomy in Kienböck's disease? A: Intact capitate head cartilage AND intact lunate fossa (radiocarpal) cartilage. Any arthritis at these articulation sites is a contraindication; fusion would be preferred.

Most Common Salvage Procedure

Q: What is the most common motion-preserving salvage procedure for Stage IIIB Kienböck's disease? A: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) - provides 80% pain relief and preserves 50% wrist motion. Durable for 10+ years if cartilage is intact.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia: Kienböck's disease is uncommon in Australia with most hand surgeons encountering fewer than 5 cases per year. The condition is more frequently seen in males aged 20-40 engaged in manual labor, particularly in industries involving vibration exposure such as construction and mining. Referral to specialist hand surgery units is recommended for surgical management given the rarity and complexity of treatment options.

Management Considerations: Australian hand surgeons typically follow the Lichtman staging system for treatment decisions. MRI is readily accessible and recommended by RACS for early diagnosis in suspected AVN. Joint leveling procedures (radial shortening) are performed for Stage II disease with negative ulnar variance, while PRC remains the preferred salvage option for Stage IIIB in appropriately selected patients. WorkCover claims may be relevant for patients in high-vibration occupations (jackhammer operators, power tool users), requiring documentation of occupational history.

Medicolegal Considerations: Informed consent for salvage procedures should address the trade-off between motion preservation and pain relief, particularly for PRC versus fusion decisions. Counseling about progression risk is essential if conservative management is chosen for early-stage disease. Documentation of ulnar variance measurement on all wrist radiographs is recommended. Consider seeking second opinion for young patients before proceeding to irreversible total wrist fusion.

KIENBÖCK'S DISEASE

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Lunate = keystone of proximal carpal row
  • •Vascular supply: Y-pattern (80%) or single vessel (20%)
  • •Type II anatomy (single vessel) = higher AVN risk
  • •Ulnar variance: negative in 78% vs 23% normal population

Lichtman Staging (Modified)

  • •Stage I: Normal X-ray, MRI shows AVN
  • •Stage II: Sclerosis, no collapse
  • •Stage IIIA: Collapse, scaphoid angle less than 60°
  • •Stage IIIB: Collapse + scaphoid rotation over 60° (CRITICAL)
  • •Stage IV: Generalized carpal arthritis

Investigations

  • •MRI: Gold standard, detects Stage I before X-ray
  • •X-ray: Measure ulnar variance on neutral PA view
  • •CT: Surgical planning, assess capitate head for PRC
  • •Scapholunate angle: over 60° = Stage IIIB (DISI)

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Stage I: Immobilization 3-6 months, serial MRI
  • •Stage II: Radial shortening if negative UV (60-80% success)
  • •Stage IIIA: Joint leveling or consider PRC
  • •Stage IIIB: PRC (if intact cartilage) or four-corner fusion
  • •Stage IV: Total wrist fusion (gold standard for pain)

Surgical Pearls

  • •Radial shortening: Decrease lunate loading 45%
  • •4+5 ECA graft: Vascularized from distal radius
  • •PRC: Requires intact capitate and radiocarpal cartilage
  • •PRC outcomes: 80% pain relief, 50% motion, durable 10+ years
Quick Stats
Reading Time93 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand