Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Midcarpal Instability

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Midcarpal Instability

Carpal instability pattern characterized by abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows, presenting with painful clunking and requiring careful clinical and radiographic assessment

complete
Updated: 2025-01-24
High Yield Overview

Midcarpal Instability

Non-dissociative carpal instability with abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows

Male ratio 4Female
60-70%Associated with generalized laxity ()
5-10%of all carpal instability cases

Critical Must-Knows

  • Pathognomonic: Painful catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
  • VISI pattern (reducible) - scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees
  • Midcarpal shift test reproduces symptoms
  • Gold standard: Dynamic fluoroscopy + arthroscopy
  • Surgical treatment: Dorsal capsulodesis

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Distinguish from static VISI (lunotriquetral dissociation)
  • "
    Beighton score assesses generalized laxity
  • "
    Lichtman classification (Grade I-IV) guides treatment
  • "
    Conservative strengthening may suffice in mild cases

Exam Warning

Catch-Up Clunk is Pathognomonic: The painful clunk during ulnar deviation occurs as the proximal row suddenly shifts from VISI (palmar flexed) to neutral alignment when the lax palmar midcarpal ligaments are overcome. This is a dynamic, reducible pattern - distinguish from static VISI seen in lunotriquetral dissociation.

At a Glance

Midcarpal instability (MCI) is a non-dissociative carpal instability pattern characterised by abnormal motion between the proximal and distal carpal rows. The pathognomonic finding is a painful "catch-up clunk" during ulnar deviation, caused by sudden shift from VISI (palmar flexion) to neutral alignment as lax palmar midcarpal ligaments are overcome. It is associated with generalised ligamentous laxity (Beighton score positive in 60-70%) and predominantly affects young females. Diagnosis requires the midcarpal shift test, dynamic fluoroscopy, and arthroscopy (Lichtman classification). Treatment ranges from conservative strengthening to dorsal capsulodesis or limited arthrodesis for refractory cases.

Mnemonic

CLUNKMCI Features - CLUNK

C
C - Catch-up clunk pathognomonic
L
L - Laxity (generalized ligamentous, Beighton positive)
U
U - Ulnar deviation reproduces symptoms
N
N - Non-dissociative instability pattern
K
K - Kinematic shift from VISI to neutral

Memory Hook:The CLUNK reminds you of the catch-up clunk sound

Mnemonic

DFAMMCI Diagnosis - DFAM

D
D - Dynamic fluoroscopy shows clunk
F
F - Fluoroscopic VISI pattern (reducible)
A
A - Arthroscopy confirms laxity (Lichtman grade)
M
M - Midcarpal shift test is key clinical exam

Memory Hook:Dynamic Fluoroscopy And Midcarpal shift test

Mnemonic

CSLMCI Treatment Ladder - CSL

C
C - Conservative strengthening and splinting
S
S - Soft tissue (dorsal capsulodesis)
L
L - Limited arthrodesis for refractory cases

Memory Hook:Conservative, Soft tissue, Limited fusion

Classification

Lichtman Classification of Midcarpal Instability:

  • Grade I: Mild laxity with positive shift test, easily reducible
  • Grade II: Moderate laxity with significant subluxation, reducible
  • Grade III: Severe laxity with fixed subluxation, partially reducible
  • Grade IV: Fixed instability, not reducible, cartilage damage

Treatment Based on Classification:

  • Grade I-II: Conservative management, consider capsulodesis if refractory
  • Grade III: Capsulodesis or ligament reconstruction
  • Grade IV: Limited arthrodesis (four-corner fusion)

Core Exam Knowledge

High-Yield Facts for Viva
  • Defining feature: Painful clunk during ulnar deviation (catch-up clunk) due to sudden shift from VISI to neutral alignment
  • Classification: Non-dissociative carpal instability (both carpal rows move as units, instability occurs between the rows)
  • Anatomic basis: Palmar midcarpal ligament laxity, particularly triquetrohamate and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid ligaments
  • Associated finding: Generalized ligamentous laxity (positive Beighton score) in 60-70% of patients
  • Gold standard diagnosis: Dynamic fluoroscopy demonstrating catch-up clunk plus arthroscopic confirmation of midcarpal laxity
  • Surgical principle: Dorsal capsulodesis (limiting palmar flexion of proximal row) is most common definitive treatment
Exam Day Essentials

Clinical Test: Midcarpal shift test - examiner applies palmar-directed force on dorsal capitate while patient ulnarly deviates wrist, reproducing painful clunk

Fluoroscopic Finding: VISI alignment (volar intercalated segment instability) in neutral position that corrects with radial deviation

Arthroscopic Classification: Lichtman classification (Grade I-IV based on degree of laxity and reducibility)

Surgical Options: Dorsal capsulodesis, palmar ligament reconstruction, limited arthrodesis (4-corner fusion) for severe cases

Incidence and Demographics

Incidence and Demographics

IV
Finding: Midcarpal instability is an underdiagnosed condition that predominantly affects young females with generalized ligamentous laxity

Midcarpal instability represents approximately 5-10% of all carpal instability cases. The condition shows a strong female predominance (female to male ratio 4:1) and typically presents in the second to fourth decades of life. Many cases are initially misdiagnosed as wrist sprain, ganglia, or other wrist pathology, leading to delayed diagnosis averaging 12-24 months from symptom onset.

Risk Factors

Generalized ligamentous laxity is present in 60-70% of patients with MCI, assessed using the Beighton hypermobility score. Other risk factors include history of wrist trauma (30-40% of cases), particularly dorsiflexion and ulnar deviation injuries, repetitive loading activities (gymnastics, yoga, weight training), and connective tissue disorders (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome). A subset of patients has bilateral involvement, suggesting constitutional laxity as the primary etiology.

Natural History

Without treatment, MCI typically follows a chronic course with persistent symptoms. Pain and clunking may worsen with activities requiring forceful grip or ulnar deviation. Progressive weakness and functional limitation are common. Long-term concerns include potential development of midcarpal arthritis, though this is less common than in dissociative carpal instabilities such as scapholunate dissociation. Spontaneous resolution is rare in adults but may occur in adolescents as skeletal maturity is reached.

Carpal Kinematics

Carpal Kinematics

High Yield

Key exam topic.

At a Glance

Midcarpal instability (MCI) is a non-dissociative carpal instability pattern characterised by abnormal motion between the proximal and distal carpal rows. The pathognomonic finding is a painful "catch-up clunk" during ulnar deviation, caused by sudden shift from VISI (palmar flexion) to neutral alignment as lax palmar midcarpal ligaments are overcome. It is associated with generalised ligamentous laxity (Beighton score positive in 60-70%) and predominantly affects young females. Diagnosis requires the midcarpal shift test, dynamic fluoroscopy, and arthroscopy (Lichtman classification). Treatment ranges from conservative strengthening to dorsal capsulodesis or limited arthrodesis for refractory cases.

In MCI, the carpal alignment is typically VISI in neutral wrist position, with a scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees and capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees with palmar angulation. However, this VISI pattern is dynamic and reducible, disappearing with radial deviation or grip. This distinguishes MCI from static VISI patterns seen with lunotriquetral dissociation.

Clinical Presentation

History

Patients typically present with ulnar-sided wrist pain that is activity-related and associated with a painful clunk or snap. The clunk is often audible to others and may be accompanied by a sensation of the wrist "giving way" or feeling unstable. Symptoms are exacerbated by activities requiring forceful grip with ulnar deviation (tennis, golf, weight lifting, push-ups) or repetitive wrist motion.

Many patients report difficulty with daily activities including opening jars, lifting heavy objects, pushing up from chairs, and keyboard use. Pain is typically intermittent and mechanical in nature, rather than constant. Swelling is usually mild if present. A subset of patients can voluntarily reproduce the clunk and may have developed a habit of self-manipulation (similar to knuckle cracking).

Physical Examination

Inspection: Look for swelling (usually minimal), asymmetry, muscle atrophy (rare), and signs of generalized laxity

Palpation: Midcarpal joint tenderness (dorsal and palmar), no discrete mass, capitate prominence dorsally in VISI position

Range of Motion: Typically full or near-full ROM; document flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation

Provocative Tests: Midcarpal shift test (key test), catch-up clunk with ulnar deviation, reduction with radial deviation

Strength: Often reduced grip strength on affected side (20-40% reduction common)

Ligamentous Laxity: Beighton score assessment (thumb to forearm, finger hyperextension, elbow/knee hyperextension, spine flexion)

The midcarpal shift test is the most specific clinical maneuver for diagnosing MCI. The examiner stabilizes the patient's forearm with one hand while placing the thumb of the other hand on the dorsal capitate, applying a palmar-directed force. The patient then actively ulnarly deviates the wrist. A positive test reproduces the painful clunk and sensation of instability as the proximal row suddenly shifts from palmar flexion to neutral.

Additional provocative maneuvers include the catch-up clunk test (passive motion from radial to ulnar deviation reproduces the clunk), the supination lift test (inability to lift weight while forearm is supinated due to pain and instability), and the shear test (applying dorsal-palmar shear force across the midcarpal joint elicits pain).

Functional Impact

Functional deficits vary with activity level and symptom severity. Common limitations include reduced grip strength (typically 50-80% of contralateral side), difficulty with activities requiring wrist extension and ulnar deviation, avoidance of weight-bearing on the affected extremity, and compensatory movement patte

Key Mnemonics

Mnemonic

VISI Clunks During UlnarCarpal Row Motion in Midcarpal Instability

Memory Hook:VISI position suddenly Clunks to neutral During Ulnar deviation - that's the catch-up clunk

Normal carpal kinematics involve coordinated motion between the proximal and distal carpal rows. During radial deviation, the proximal row extends and the scaphoid extends. During ulnar deviation, the proximal row flexes (palmar flexion) and the scaphoid flexes. This motion is controlled by intrinsic and extrinsic carpal ligaments that provide constraint and stability.

Ligamentous Anatomy

The palmar midcarpal ligaments are critical stabilizers preventing excessive palmar flexion of the proximal carpal row. Key structures include the triquetrohamate-capitate ligament (strongest palmar midcarpal ligament), scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) ligament complex, and palmar scaphocapitate ligament. These ligaments originate from the distal carpal row and insert on the proximal row, providing a sling effect that prevents excessive VISI alignment.

Insufficiency or laxity of these palmar midcarpal ligaments allows the proximal row to assume a palmar flexed (VISI) position. As the wrist is moved from radial to ulnar deviation, the forces eventually overcome the lax ligaments and the proximal row suddenly snaps from palmar flexion to neutral or even slight extension. This sudden shift creates the characteristic catch-up clunk.

Carpal Alignment Patterns

VISI versus DISI Carpal Instability Patterns

featurevisidisi
Proximal row positionPalmar flexion (flexed)Dorsiflexion (extended)
Scapholunate angleLess than 30 degreesGreater than 70 degrees
Capitolunate angleGreater than 15 degrees (palmar)Greater than 15 degrees (dorsal)
Common etiologyLunotriquetral dissociation or midcarpal instabilityScapholunate dissociation
Lateral radiograph appearanceLunate tilts palmarly (cup spills palmar)Lunate tilts dorsally (cup spills dorsal)
Mnemonic

MILD MCILichtman MCI Classification

Memory Hook:Think of severity progression from MILD to severe MCI

The Lichtman classification is the most widely used system for MCI. Grade I (dynamic) shows VISI alignment only with provocative maneuvers and is often asymptomatic. Grade II (static reducible) demonstrates VISI on resting lateral radiograph but corrects with radial deviation or grip. Grade III (static irreducible) shows persistent VISI that does not fully correct with radial deviation. Grade IV (arthritic) demonstrates midcarpal degenerative changes in addition to instability.

Anatomic Subtypes

MCI can be classified anatomically based on the primary site of laxity. Palmar MCI (most common, 80-90% of cases) involves laxity of the palmar midcarpal ligaments with VISI alignment. Dorsal MCI (rare, less than 10%) involves dorsal midcarpal ligament laxity with DISI-type alignment. Combined patterns may occur, particularly in patients with severe generalized ligamentous laxity.

Extrinsic versus Intrinsic MCI

Extrinsic MCI results from radiocarpal ligament laxity (particularly palmar radiocarpal ligaments) that allows abnormal proximal row position. Intrinsic MCI results from midcarpal ligament laxity (triquetrohamate, STT complex) that fails to control proximal row position. This distinction is primarily theoretical, as most cases involve combined laxity patterns and treatment is similar.

Management

Non-Operative Treatment

IV
Finding: Conservative management with activity modification, NSAIDs, splinting, and strengthening exercises achieves satisfactory outcomes in 40-50% of patients with mild to moderate MCI

rns. Athletes may be unable to participate in their sport, particularly in gymnastics, racquet sports, golf, and weight training.

Radiographic Evaluation

Radiographic Evaluation

Standard radiographs (posteroanterior, lateral, oblique views) are often normal or show subtle findings. The lateral view may demonstrate VISI alignment in neutral position with a capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees (palmar angulation) and scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees. However, these findings may be absent on static radiographs if the patient is not relaxed or if the technologist inadvertently positions the wrist in slight radial deviation.

IV
Finding: Video fluoroscopy demonstrating the catch-up clunk during dynamic ulnar deviation is the most sensitive imaging test for midcarpal instability

Dynamic fluoroscopic examination with video recording is the gold standard radiographic study for diagnosing MCI. The examination is performed with the patient seated and the forearm resting on the fluoroscopy table. Real-time imaging captures the wrist as it moves from full radial to full ulnar deviation. The catch-up clunk is visualized as a sudden shift of the proximal carpal row from palmar flexion (VISI) to neutral or slight extension.

Stress radiographs may be helpful, including ulnar deviation views (may accentuate VISI deformity), grip compression views (assess for dynamic instability), and comparison views of the contralateral wrist. Quantitative measurements include the capitolunate angle (normal less than 15 degrees), scapholunate angle (normal 30-60 degrees), and radiolunate angle (normal 0 plus or minus 15 degrees).

Advanced Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically normal in isolated MCI, as the ligamentous laxity represents attenuation rather than complete rupture. MR arthrography may show increased capacity of the midcarpal joint or contrast extravasation into the radiocarpal joint with midcarpal injection, suggesting ligamentous communication. However, MRI is primarily useful for excluding other pathology such as triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, lunotriquetral dissociation, or occult fractures.

Computed tomography (CT) is rarely indicated for MCI evaluation unless there is concern for subtle carpal coalition, malunion, or arthritis. CT arthrography has been described but is not commonly used in current practice given the superiority of MRI and arthroscopy for soft tissue assessment.

Wrist Arthroscopy

IV
Finding: Wrist arthroscopy allows direct visualization and grading of midcarpal laxity using the trampoline test and assessment of associated pathology

Wrist arthroscopy is both diagnostic and potentially therapeutic for MCI. The examination is performed under regional or general anesthesia with the wrist in traction. Standard portals (3-4, 4-5, 6R radiocarpal; midcarpal radial and ulnar) are established. The midcarpal joint is examined for excessive laxity between the proximal and distal rows, assessed using a probe (trampoline test or bounce test). The palmar midcarpal ligaments are visualized and assessed for attenuation, thinning, or disruption.

Arthroscopic classification systems have been proposed based on the degree of laxity and reducibility. Grade I shows mild laxity with easy manual reduction, Grade II demonstrates moderate laxity with manual reduction required, Grade III exhibits severe laxity that is difficult to reduce, and Grade IV shows severe laxity with associated midcarpal arthritis or other structural damage.

Classification

Lichtman Classification of Palmar Midcarpal Instability

Conservative management is the initial treatment for most patients with MCI, particularly those with mild symptoms (Lichtman Grade I-II) and those with generalized ligamentous laxity. The mainstay of treatment is wrist strengthening and proprioceptive training, focusing on dynamic stabilizers (flexor carpi ulnaris, extensor carpi ulnaris, wrist extensors and flexors). A structured hand therapy program should include progressive resistance exercises, proprioceptive training (balance board, closed kinetic chain activities), and activity-specific training.

Splinting may provide symptom relief, particularly for acute exacerbations. Options include cock-up wrist splints maintaining the wrist in slight radial deviation and extension (prevents VISI position), custom molded splints for activities, and taping techniques to support the wrist during provocative activities. Splints are typically worn during aggravating activities and at night for 6-12 weeks during the rehabilitation program.

Activity modification involves avoiding or modifying activities that provoke symptoms, particularly those requiring forceful grip with ulnar deviation. Anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) may provide short-term pain relief but do not address the underlying instability. Corticosteroid injections are generally not recommended as they do not provide lasting benefit and may contribute to ligamentous weakening.

Indications for Surgery

Surgery is considered when conservative management fails after 3-6 months of appropriate therapy, symptoms significantly limit function or quality of life, patients are unable to participate in work or sports activities, or there is documented progression of instability on dynamic imaging. Relative contraindications include severe generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score greater than 7 out of 9), workers' compensation claims or litigation (poorer outcomes reported), psychiatric comorbidities, and unrealistic patient expectations.

Surgical Options

Surgical Treatment Options for Midcarpal Instability

featureindicationtechniqueoutcomes
Dorsal capsulodesisGrade II-III palmar MCI, most common procedureReef dorsal capsule to limit palmar flexion70-80% good/excellent, preserves motion
Palmar ligament reconstructionIsolated palmar ligament deficiencyReconstruct triquetrohamate ligament with graftLimited long-term data, technically demanding
Four-corner fusionGrade IV with arthritis, salvage procedureFuse capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrumReliable pain relief, significant motion loss
Arthroscopic thermal shrinkageGrade I-II, controversialRadiofrequency shrinkage of lax capsuleHigh recurrence rate, falling out of favor

Dorsal Capsulodesis Technique

Dorsal capsulodesis is the most commonly performed procedure for MCI. The technique involves creating a dorsal wrist incision, typically between the third and fourth extensor compartments. The extensor retinaculum is incised and the extensor tendons are retracted to expose the dorsal capsule. A distally based capsular flap is created, preserving the attachment to the distal carpal row. The flap is then advanced proximally and secured to the dorsal lip of the radius, effectively tightening the dorsal structures and limiting palmar flexion of the proximal carpal row.

Multiple capsulodesis techniques have been described, including the Ritt capsulodesis (radially based flap), the Lichtman capsulodesis (ulnarly based flap), and the dorsal radiocarpal ligament advancement. All techniques share the goal of preventing excessive palmar flexion while preserving wrist motion. The capsule is secured with suture anchors or transosseous sutures. Postoperative immobilization in a short arm cast for 6 weeks is typical, followed by progressive range of motion and strengthening.

Palmar Ligament Reconstruction

Palmar ligament reconstruction attempts to directly restore the deficient palmar midcarpal ligaments. The procedure uses tendon graft (palmaris longus, plantaris, or toe extensor) passed through bone tunnels in the capitate and triquetrum to recreate the triquetrohamate-capitate ligament. The technique is technically demanding and requires accurate tunnel placement and appropriate graft tension. Long-term outcomes are variable, with some studies reporting good results and others showing high failure rates. This procedure is less commonly performed than dorsal capsulodesis.

Limited Wrist Arthrodesis

Four-corner fusion (capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrum arthrodesis with scaphoid excision) is reserved for salvage situations, particularly Lichtman Grade IV MCI with established midcarpal arthritis. The procedure provides reliable pain relief and stability but sacrifices approximately 50% of wrist motion (particularly flexion-extension arc). The technique involves excision of the scaphoid, preparation of the articular surfaces of the four remaining bones, and fixation with a circular plate, dorsal plate, or compression screws. Scaphoid excision prevents impingement and allows settling of the carpus.

Total wrist arthrodesis is considered only for failed prior procedures or severe symptomatic arthritis affecting multiple carpal articulations. This salvage procedure eliminates all wrist motion but provides stable pain-free support for activities of daily living.

Complications

Surgical Complications

Recurrent Instability: Most common complication after capsulodesis (15-25%); consider revision versus salvage fusion

Stiffness: Expected loss of 10-20 degrees flexion-extension after capsulodesis; aggressive therapy if excessive

Pain: Persistent pain suggests inadequate stabilization, nerve injury, or unrecognized pathology; investigate thoroughly

Dorsal Ganglion: May form at capsulodesis site; often asymptomatic, excise if symptomatic

Neurovascular Injury: Rare but possible; protect terminal branches of radial and ulnar nerves during dissection

Early complications include wound infection (1-2%), hematoma formation, and iatrogenic nerve injury (dorsal sensory branch of radial nerve or ulnar nerve most vulnerable). Nerve injury typically presents as numbness or dysesthesia over the dorsal hand and may be temporary (neurapraxia) or permanent (nerve division).

Late complications include recurrent instability (most common, occurring in 15-25% after capsulodesis), wrist stiffness (expected to some degree but may be excessive), chronic pain (may indicate inadequate correction or progression to arthritis), and dorsal ganglion formation at the capsulodesis site. Hardware complications (loosening, prominence, irritation) may occur after four-corner fusion.

Outcomes and Prognosis

IV
Finding: Dorsal capsulodesis achieves 70-80% good to excellent outcomes at 2-5 year follow-up, with mean patient satisfaction of 7-8 out of 10

Outcomes after surgical treatment for MCI are generally favorable for appropriately selected patients. Dorsal capsulodesis results in resolution or significant improvement of the catch-up clunk in 75-85% of patients, with pain improvement in 70-80% and satisfaction scores of 7-8 out of 10. However, recurrence occurs in 15-25% of cases, particularly in patients with severe generalized laxity or those who return to high-demand activities prematurely.

Functional outcomes include return to work in 85-90% of patients at 3-6 months postoperatively, return to sports in 60-70% (often with some activity modification), and grip strength recovery to 80-90% of the contralateral side. Range of motion is typically reduced by 10-20 degrees in flexion-extension arc compared to the contralateral wrist, which is an expected and generally well-tolerated tradeoff for stability.

Factors associated with poorer outcomes include severe generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score greater than 7), workers' compensation or litigation involvement, late presentation with established arthritis (Grade IV), bilateral involvement, and unrealistic patient expectations. Careful patient selection and thorough preoperative counseling are critical to achieving satisfactory outcomes.

MCI Summary

Midcarpal Instability Overview

Definition:

  • Non-dissociative carpal instability
  • Abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows
  • Midcarpal joint is the site of instability

Key Features:

  • Pathognomonic finding: Catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
  • Associated with generalized ligamentous laxity (60-70%)
  • Peak incidence: Young females (20-40 years)
  • 4:1 female predominance

MCI Key Facts

FeatureDetails
Instability typeNon-dissociative (rows intact, instability between rows)
Carpal alignmentVISI pattern (volar intercalated segment instability)
Anatomic basisPalmar midcarpal ligament laxity (triquetrohamate)
Gold standard diagnosisDynamic fluoroscopy + wrist arthroscopy

Pathophysiology

Exam Viva Point

The Catch-Up Clunk Explained:

  1. VISI position at rest (proximal row palmarly flexed)
  2. Lax palmar midcarpal ligaments fail to control row position
  3. During ulnar deviation, forces eventually overcome laxity
  4. Proximal row suddenly "catches up" from VISI to neutral
  5. This sudden shift = audible/palpable clunk

Classification:

  • Palmar MCI (80-90%): Triquetrohamate laxity → VISI
  • Dorsal MCI (rare): STT laxity → DISI pattern

Anatomy

Midcarpal Ligament Anatomy

Palmar Midcarpal Ligaments (Primary Stabilizers):

  • Triquetrohamate-capitate ligament - Strongest palmar stabilizer
  • Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) ligament complex
  • Palmar scaphocapitate ligament

Function:

  • Form a "sling" from distal to proximal row
  • Prevent excessive palmar flexion of proximal row
  • Control the transition during wrist motion

Dorsal Ligaments:

  • Dorsal radiocarpal ligament
  • Dorsal intercarpal ligament
  • Provide secondary restraint to palmar flexion

Functional Anatomy

Exam Viva Point

Normal Carpal Kinematics:

  • Radial deviation: Proximal row extends
  • Ulnar deviation: Proximal row flexes
  • Palmar midcarpal ligaments control this transition smoothly
  • In MCI: Lax ligaments allow proximal row to "flop" into VISI, then suddenly correct

Two-Row Carpal System:

  • Proximal row: Scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum (intercalated segment)
  • Distal row: Trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, hamate
  • Proximal row has no direct tendon attachments - position controlled by ligaments

Classification

Lichtman Classification

Lichtman Classification of MCI

GradeDescriptionImagingTreatment
Grade I (Dynamic)VISI only with provocative maneuversNormal resting radiographConservative
Grade II (Static Reducible)VISI at rest, corrects with radial deviationVISI on lateral viewConservative → Surgery
Grade III (Static Irreducible)Persistent VISI, does not correctFixed VISI on all viewsSurgery (capsulodesis)
Grade IV (Arthritic)VISI plus midcarpal arthritisArthritis on radiographSalvage (fusion)

Classification Details

Exam Viva Point

Anatomic Subtypes:

  • Palmar MCI (80-90%): Triquetrohamate laxity → VISI alignment
  • Dorsal MCI (less than 10%): STT laxity → DISI alignment
  • Combined patterns occur with severe generalized laxity

VISI Measurements:

  • Scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees (normal 30-60 degrees)
  • Capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees (palmar angulation)
  • Radiolunate angle abnormal

Instability Type Classification:

  • Non-dissociative: Both carpal rows intact (MCI)
  • Dissociative: Intrinsic ligament tear (SL or LT dissociation)

Clinical Assessment

Clinical Examination

History:

  • Painful clunk during wrist motion (pathognomonic)
  • Ulnar-sided wrist pain, activity-related
  • Worse with forceful grip, ulnar deviation
  • Sensation of wrist "giving way"

Examination:

  • Assess Beighton score (ligamentous laxity present in 60-70%)
  • Midcarpal tenderness (dorsal and palmar)
  • Range of motion (usually preserved)
  • Grip strength (typically reduced 20-40%)

Key Provocative Test:

  • Midcarpal shift test: Examiner applies palmar force on dorsal capitate while patient ulnarly deviates → reproduces clunk

Examination Details

Exam Viva Point

Midcarpal Shift Test Technique:

  1. Patient seated, forearm on table
  2. Examiner stabilizes forearm with one hand
  3. Place thumb on dorsal capitate
  4. Apply palmar-directed force
  5. Patient actively ulnarly deviates wrist
  6. Positive: Painful clunk reproduced

Additional Tests:

  • Catch-up clunk test: Passive radial to ulnar deviation
  • Supination lift test: Inability to lift with supination
  • Shear test: Dorsal-palmar force across midcarpal joint

Differential Diagnosis:

  • Lunotriquetral dissociation (also VISI, but intrinsic ligament tear)
  • TFCC tear
  • Ulnocarpal impaction
  • ECU instability

Viva Imaging Review

Imaging for MCI

Standard Radiographs:

  • PA, lateral, oblique views
  • Often normal on static views
  • Lateral may show VISI (capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees palmar)

Gold Standard:

  • Dynamic fluoroscopy during ulnar deviation
  • Captures the catch-up clunk in real-time
  • Video recording essential for documentation

Wrist Arthroscopy:

  • Confirms midcarpal laxity (trampoline test)
  • Grades severity (Lichtman classification)
  • Excludes other pathology

Investigation Details

Exam Viva Point

VISI Radiographic Criteria:

  • Scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees (normally 30-60 degrees)
  • Capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees (palmar angulation)
  • Lunate tilts palmarly on lateral ("cup spills palmar")

Key: Static radiographs may be normal - dynamic fluoroscopy essential!

MRI Role:

  • Typically normal in isolated MCI (laxity, not rupture)
  • Useful to exclude TFCC tears, LT dissociation
  • Not primary diagnostic tool for MCI

Arthroscopic Findings:

  • Trampoline test: Excessive laxity of midcarpal ligaments when probed
  • Capitate head may sublux palmarly
  • Assess for associated pathology

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Midcarpal Instability Management Algorithm
Click to expand

Management Algorithm

Conservative Treatment (First-line):

  • Wrist strengthening (ECU, wrist extensors)
  • Proprioceptive training
  • Splinting in slight radial deviation/extension
  • Activity modification
  • Duration: 3-6 months trial
  • Success rate: 40-50% for Grade I-II

Surgical Options

ProcedureIndicationOutcomes
Dorsal capsulodesisGrade II-III, failed conservative70-80% good/excellent
Palmar ligament reconstructionIsolated TH deficiencyVariable results
Four-corner fusionGrade IV with arthritisReliable pain relief, 50% motion loss

Surgical Decision-Making

Exam Viva Point

Surgical Indications:

  • Failed conservative management (3-6 months)
  • Significant functional limitation
  • Unable to participate in work/sports
  • Progressive instability on dynamic imaging

Relative Contraindications:

  • Severe generalized laxity (Beighton greater than 7)
  • Workers' compensation/litigation
  • Unrealistic expectations

Dorsal Capsulodesis (Most Common):

  • Reef dorsal capsule to limit palmar flexion of proximal row
  • Multiple techniques (Ritt, Lichtman)
  • 70-80% success rate
  • Expect 10-20 degree motion loss (trade-off for stability)

Surgical Technique

Dorsal Capsulodesis Technique

Approach:

  • Dorsal wrist incision between 3rd and 4th extensor compartments
  • Incise extensor retinaculum
  • Retract extensor tendons

Capsulodesis Steps:

  1. Create distally based capsular flap
  2. Preserve attachment to distal carpal row
  3. Advance flap proximally
  4. Secure to dorsal lip of radius
  5. Tightens dorsal structures, limits palmar flexion

Fixation:

  • Suture anchors or transosseous sutures

Immobilization:

  • Short arm cast 6 weeks
  • Progressive ROM then strengthening

Technique Variations

Exam Viva Point

Capsulodesis Techniques:

  • Ritt capsulodesis: Radially based flap
  • Lichtman capsulodesis: Ulnarly based flap
  • DRC advancement: Dorsal radiocarpal ligament advancement
  • All share goal: Prevent excessive proximal row palmar flexion

Palmar Ligament Reconstruction:

  • Tendon graft (palmaris longus)
  • Bone tunnels in capitate and triquetrum
  • Recreates triquetrohamate-capitate ligament
  • Technically demanding, variable outcomes

Four-Corner Fusion (Salvage):

  • For Grade IV with arthritis
  • Excise scaphoid
  • Fuse capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrum
  • Circular plate or compression screws
  • Reliable pain relief but 50% motion loss

Complications

Surgical Complications

Recurrent Instability (Most Common):

  • Occurs in 15-25% after capsulodesis
  • Higher risk with severe generalized laxity
  • May require revision or salvage fusion

Stiffness:

  • Expected 10-20 degree motion loss after capsulodesis
  • Excessive stiffness requires aggressive therapy
  • Trade-off: Motion loss for stability

Other Complications:

  • Persistent pain (inadequate correction or missed pathology)
  • Dorsal ganglion at capsulodesis site
  • Nerve injury (dorsal sensory branches)
  • Wound infection (1-2%)

Complication Management

Exam Viva Point

Recurrent Instability Management:

  • Re-evaluate for missed pathology
  • Consider revision capsulodesis with larger flap
  • Augment with palmar ligament reconstruction
  • Salvage: Four-corner fusion if all else fails

Factors Predicting Complications:

  • Severe generalized laxity (Beighton greater than 7)
  • Return to high-demand activities too early
  • Workers' compensation involvement
  • Bilateral disease

Nerve Injury:

  • Dorsal sensory branch radial nerve most at risk
  • Presents as numbness/dysesthesia dorsal hand
  • Usually neurapraxia (temporary)
  • Protect branches during dissection

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Dorsal Capsulodesis:

  • Short arm cast: 6 weeks
  • Progressive ROM: 6-10 weeks
  • Strengthening: 10+ weeks
  • Return to sport: 4-6 months

Four-Corner Fusion:

  • Short arm cast: 8-10 weeks (until fusion)
  • Confirm radiographic union
  • Progressive ROM after union
  • Return to activity: 4-6 months

Rehabilitation Details

Hand Therapy Program:

  • Edema control and scar management
  • Progressive ROM (protect capsulodesis initially)
  • Grip and wrist strengthening
  • Proprioceptive training
  • Activity-specific rehabilitation

Exam Viva Point

Return to Activity Guidelines:

  • Capsulodesis: 4-6 months for sport
  • Graduated progression essential
  • Counseling about realistic expectations
  • High-demand athletes: Higher recurrence risk even after surgery

Motion Goals:

  • Expect 10-20 degree loss of flexion-extension arc
  • This is acceptable trade-off for stability
  • Grip strength: 80-90% of contralateral

Outcomes

Outcome Summary

Conservative Management:

  • 40-50% satisfactory outcomes for Grade I-II
  • Best results with structured therapy program
  • May require ongoing activity modification

Dorsal Capsulodesis:

  • 70-80% good to excellent outcomes
  • Clunk resolution: 75-85%
  • Pain improvement: 70-80%
  • Patient satisfaction: 7-8/10

Functional Recovery:

  • Return to work: 85-90% at 3-6 months
  • Return to sport: 60-70% (with some modification)
  • Grip strength: 80-90% of contralateral

Outcome Predictors

Exam Viva Point

Factors Predicting Better Outcomes:

  • Grade I-II disease
  • No generalized laxity or Beighton less than 4
  • Non-workers' compensation
  • Realistic expectations
  • Good rehabilitation compliance

Factors Predicting Poorer Outcomes:

  • Severe generalized laxity (Beighton greater than 7)
  • Workers' compensation/litigation
  • Bilateral involvement
  • High-demand activities (elite sport)
  • Unrealistic expectations

Recurrence Risk:

  • Overall: 15-25%
  • Higher with generalized laxity
  • Higher with early return to provocative activities

Evidence Base

Key Evidence

Seminal Studies:

  • Lichtman et al (1993): Original classification and capsulodesis outcomes
  • Johnson & Carrera (1986): Dynamic fluoroscopy gold standard
  • Wright et al (1994): Conservative management outcomes

Key Findings:

  • Conservative: 40-50% success for mild MCI
  • Capsulodesis: 70-80% good/excellent at 2-5 years
  • Recurrence: 15-25% even after surgery

Evidence Summary

IV
Finding: Dorsal capsulodesis achieves 70-80% good/excellent outcomes at mid-term follow-up

IV
Finding: Dynamic fluoroscopy is the most sensitive imaging test for detecting catch-up clunk

Exam Viva Point

Evidence Limitations:

  • No randomized trials comparing treatments
  • Mostly Level IV case series
  • Heterogeneous outcome measures
  • Short to medium term follow-up

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Midcarpal Instability - Initial Diagnosis

EXAMINER

"A 24-year-old female gymnast presents with painful clunking in her right wrist that has progressively worsened over the past year. She reports the clunk occurs with certain movements and is accompanied by pain. Examination reveals a positive midcarpal shift test. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is consistent with midcarpal instability. I would perform a comprehensive assessment including detailed history about the clunk (timing, provocative activities, trauma history), examination for generalized ligamentous laxity using the Beighton score, assessment of wrist range of motion and strength, and the midcarpal shift test which is already positive. Investigations would include standard wrist radiographs (PA, lateral, oblique) looking for VISI alignment on the lateral view, dynamic fluoroscopy during ulnar deviation to capture the catch-up clunk, and possibly wrist MRI to exclude other pathology such as TFCC tears. Initial management would be conservative with a structured hand therapy program focusing on wrist strengthening and proprioceptive training, activity modification to avoid provocative positions, and trial of wrist splinting in slight radial deviation and extension during activities. I would reassess at 3 months and consider surgical options if conservative management fails.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Midcarpal shift test is the key clinical diagnostic maneuver
Assess for generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score) - present in 60-70% of MCI patients
Dynamic fluoroscopy showing catch-up clunk is gold standard imaging test
Initial treatment is conservative with strengthening, proprioception, activity modification
Surgery considered after 3-6 months of failed conservative management
Dorsal capsulodesis is the most common surgical procedure performed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ordering only static radiographs without dynamic fluoroscopy (may miss the diagnosis)
✗Proceeding directly to surgery without adequate trial of therapy (most improve with conservative care)
✗Failing to assess for generalized laxity (affects prognosis and surgical outcomes)
✗Confusing MCI with lunotriquetral dissociation (different pathology, different treatment)
✗Not counseling about realistic expectations (10-20 degree motion loss after capsulodesis is expected)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the midcarpal shift test and how do you perform it?"
"How does MCI differ from scapholunate dissociation?"
"What is VISI alignment and how is it measured on lateral radiograph?"
"Describe the technique for dorsal capsulodesis"
"What are the indications for four-corner fusion in MCI?"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Failed Conservative Management

EXAMINER

"The gymnast returns after 6 months of hand therapy and activity modification. She reports some improvement but continues to have significant clunking and pain with gymnastics, which she wants to continue. Grip strength is 60% of the contralateral side. She asks about surgical options. How would you counsel her?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
After 6 months of appropriate conservative management with persistent significant symptoms affecting her athletic participation, surgical treatment is reasonable to consider. I would review her imaging including confirmation of the diagnosis with dynamic fluoroscopy and arthroscopic evaluation if not already performed. For counseling, I would explain that the most common procedure is dorsal capsulodesis which involves tightening the dorsal wrist capsule to prevent excessive palmar flexion of the proximal carpal row that causes the clunk. I would discuss realistic expectations including 70-80% chance of good to excellent outcome, expected loss of 10-20 degrees of wrist motion (particularly flexion), recurrence rate of 15-25% especially in patients with generalized laxity, and timeline for return to gymnastics (typically 4-6 months postoperatively). I would also discuss that her young age, high athletic demands, and likely generalized laxity (given her sport) may increase the risk of recurrence. Alternative options would include continued conservative management with acceptance of current limitations, or consideration of four-corner fusion as a salvage if capsulodesis fails, though this would likely end her gymnastics career due to motion loss.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Surgical consideration appropriate after 6 months of failed conservative management
Dorsal capsulodesis is first-line surgical treatment (70-80% success rate)
Set realistic expectations about motion loss (10-20 degrees flexion-extension)
Discuss recurrence risk (15-25%, higher with generalized laxity and high-demand activities)
Return to gymnastics timeline is 4-6 months with graduated progression
Consider wrist arthroscopy for diagnosis confirmation and prognostic information
COMMON TRAPS
✗Promising complete resolution or return to pre-injury status (unrealistic in high-level athletes)
✗Not discussing the option of continuing conservative management and accepting limitations
✗Offering four-corner fusion as a primary procedure (excessive for young athlete without arthritis)
✗Failing to address the role of generalized laxity in prognosis and recurrence
✗Not involving the patient in shared decision-making about surgical risks versus benefits
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe your surgical technique for dorsal capsulodesis in detail"
"What is your postoperative rehabilitation protocol?"
"How would you manage recurrent instability after capsulodesis?"
"What arthroscopic findings would you expect in this patient?"
"How do you counsel about return to elite-level gymnastics?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the pathognomonic clinical finding in midcarpal instability?

A: Catch-up clunk or clunk test: Painful clunk during ulnar deviation with axial load as proximal carpal row suddenly shifts from VISI to neutral/DISI position. Represents sudden reduction of subluxed capitate. Reproduces patient's symptoms. Differentiates MCI from other carpal instabilities.

Exam Pearl

Q: What distinguishes palmar from dorsal midcarpal instability?

A: Palmar MCI (most common): Proximal row sits in VISI (volar intercalated segment instability), clunks into extension with ulnar deviation. Dorsal MCI (rare): Proximal row in DISI, clunks into flexion. Palmar MCI involves triquetrohamate ligament laxity; dorsal MCI involves scaphotrapezial ligament laxity.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the role of the triquetrohamate (TH) ligament in midcarpal stability?

A: The triquetrohamate ligament is the primary restraint preventing VISI deformity. Incompetence allows proximal row to flex (VISI pattern) with the head of capitate subluxing palmarly. During ulnar deviation, intact TH ligament normally controls smooth proximal row extension. Attenuation creates the "catch-up" phenomenon.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the initial treatment for midcarpal instability?

A: Conservative treatment first: Wrist strengthening (especially ECU and wrist extensors), proprioceptive training, taping, activity modification. Surgical options if conservative fails: Thermal capsulorrhaphy (controversial durability), soft tissue reconstruction, limited carpal fusion (triquetrohamate or four-corner fusion) for refractory cases.

Exam Pearl

Q: How does midcarpal instability appear on static radiographs?

A: Static radiographs often normal - hence termed "non-dissociative" instability. May show VISI pattern (scapholunate angle less than 30°, capitolunate angle greater than 15° palmar). Fluoroscopic examination during active motion essential to demonstrate clunk. Cineradiography captures dynamic instability not visible on static films.

Australian Context

Australian Practice Considerations

Healthcare Settings:

  • Hand surgeons with wrist expertise in metropolitan centres
  • Access to fluoroscopy for dynamic imaging
  • Wrist arthroscopy in major hospitals

Imaging Access:

  • Standard radiographs readily available
  • Dynamic fluoroscopy requires coordination with radiology
  • Video recording capability important for documentation

Hand Therapy:

  • Certified hand therapists (CHT) essential for conservative management
  • Public hospital hand clinics and private practices
  • Medicare rebates with appropriate referral

Healthcare System Considerations

Surgical Services:

  • Dorsal capsulodesis performed in both public and private settings
  • Day surgery or overnight stay typically
  • MBS item numbers apply for wrist stabilization procedures

Exam Viva Point

Australian-Specific Points:

  • Dynamic fluoroscopy may require advance arrangement
  • Hand therapy critical for both conservative and postoperative care
  • Workers' compensation cases may have prolonged recovery
  • Sports medicine physicians may be involved in athlete cases

Referral Pathways:

  • Often referred from sports medicine or physiotherapy
  • High index of suspicion needed (commonly missed diagnosis)
  • Average delay to diagnosis 12-24 months

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition and Pathognomonic Features

  • •Non-dissociative carpal instability with abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows
  • •Hallmark: painful catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
  • •Anatomic basis: palmar midcarpal ligament laxity (triquetrohamate, STT complex)
  • •Associated with generalized ligamentous laxity in 60-70% of cases

Clinical Diagnosis - Key Test

  • •MIDCARPAL SHIFT TEST: Stabilize forearm, apply palmar-directed force on dorsal capitate, patient ulnarly deviates wrist
  • •Positive: reproduces painful clunk and instability sensation
  • •Also perform catch-up clunk test (passive radial to ulnar deviation)
  • •Assess Beighton score for generalized laxity

Classification - Lichtman System

  • •Grade I (Dynamic): VISI only with provocative maneuvers
  • •Grade II (Static Reducible): VISI at rest, corrects with radial deviation
  • •Grade III (Static Irreducible): Persistent VISI
  • •Grade IV (Arthritic): Midcarpal arthritis present
  • •Also classify as palmar (80-90%, VISI) versus dorsal (rare, DISI) MCI

Investigation Protocol

  • •Standard radiographs (PA/lateral): Look for VISI alignment (capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees palmar, scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees)
  • •GOLD STANDARD: Dynamic fluoroscopy capturing catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
  • •Wrist arthroscopy: Confirms midcarpal laxity with trampoline test, grades severity

Conservative Management

  • •First-line for Grade I-II, 3-6 months trial
  • •Components: Wrist strengthening (dynamic stabilizers), proprioceptive training
  • •Activity modification (avoid ulnar deviation with grip), splinting in slight radial deviation/extension
  • •Success rate 40-50% in mild-moderate cases
  • •Surgery if failed conservative care

Surgical Treatment Algorithm

  • •PRIMARY: Dorsal capsulodesis (most common) - reef dorsal capsule to limit palmar flexion
  • •70-80% good/excellent outcomes; expect 10-20 degree motion loss
  • •ALTERNATIVE: Palmar ligament reconstruction (technically demanding, variable results)
  • •SALVAGE: Four-corner fusion for Grade IV with arthritis
  • •Recurrence rate 15-25% after capsulodesis

Key Complications

  • •Recurrent instability (15-25%, especially with generalized laxity)
  • •Stiffness (10-20 degree flexion-extension loss expected after capsulodesis, may be excessive)
  • •Persistent pain (inadequate stabilization or unrecognized pathology)
  • •Dorsal ganglion at capsulodesis site
  • •Nerve injury (dorsal sensory branches of radial/ulnar nerves)

Viva Talking Points

  • •Emphasize non-dissociative instability (both rows intact, instability between rows)
  • •Know midcarpal shift test technique
  • •Understand VISI alignment and measurement
  • •Dynamic fluoroscopy is gold standard imaging
  • •Conservative management first-line (3-6 months)
  • •Dorsal capsulodesis most common surgery (70-80% success)
  • •Motion loss expected tradeoff for stability; generalized laxity affects prognosis

Additional Resources and Further Reading

IV
Finding: Understanding the spectrum of carpal instability patterns, including the distinction between dissociative (SLIL, LTIL tears) and non-dissociative (midcarpal, radiocarpal) patterns, is essential for appropriate diagnosis and treatment

Midcarpal instability represents one pattern within the broader spectrum of carpal instability. Familiarity with the classification of carpal instabilities (dissociative versus non-dissociative, VISI versus DISI patterns) is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. MCI must be distinguished from lunotriquetral dissociation (which can also present with VISI), scapholunate dissociation (DISI pattern), and other wrist pathology.

Australian Specific Considerations

Midcarpal instability is managed by hand surgeons with expertise in wrist pathology, typically in metropolitan centres with access to fluoroscopy and wrist arthroscopy capabilities. Public hospital hand clinics provide assessment and treatment, with surgical procedures performed at major teaching hospitals. Private hand surgery practices offer alternative pathways for assessment and operative management.

Imaging is readily available through public and private radiology services, with dynamic fluoroscopy requiring coordination between the hand surgeon and radiologist to ensure appropriate views are captured. Wrist arthroscopy is performed in both public and private hospital settings with appropriate arthroscopic equipment and expertise.

Hand therapy is a critical component of both conservative and postoperative management, with certified hand therapists (CHT) available in major centres. Medicare rebates apply for hand therapy services with appropriate referral. Occupational therapy services may provide functional assessment and work-related rehabilitation for patients with MCI affecting employment.

Examination Techniques and Tips

Clinical examination for suspected MCI should be systematic and include comparison to the contralateral wrist. The midcarpal shift test must be performed correctly with appropriate force application and patient positioning. Video recording the provocative maneuver can be valuable for documentation and patient education.

Dynamic fluoroscopy requires clear communication with the radiology technologist regarding the specific views and maneuvers needed. Real-time video capture during the examination from radial to full ulnar deviation is essential. Side-by-side comparison with the contralateral asymptomatic wrist can be helpful in subtle cases.

Wrist arthroscopy for MCI evaluation requires familiarity with both radiocarpal and midcarpal portals and systematic examination of all carpal articulations. The trampoline test (applying pressure with the probe on the palmar midcarpal ligaments to assess laxity) should be performed in multiple locations. Comparison to the expected normal resistance is subjective and improves with experience.

Future Directions

Research into the molecular basis of ligamentous laxity may identify genetic markers or predisposing factors for MCI, potentially allowing preventive strategies. Improved arthroscopic techniques including thermal capsular modification and ligament reconstruction are being refined. Biomechanical studies using computational modeling may optimize capsulodesis techniques and predict outcomes. Long-term outcome studies with validated patient-reported measures are needed to better compare surgical techniques and guide treatment algorithms.


This topic provides comprehensive coverage of midcarpal instability aligned with FRACS examination requirements, emphasizing clinical diagnosis, dynamic imaging assessment, and evidence-based surgical management of this challenging carpal instability pattern.

Quick Stats
Reading Time130 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand