Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Nerve Sheath Tumors of the Spine

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Nerve Sheath Tumors of the Spine

Comprehensive guide to schwannomas and neurofibromas of the spine including diagnosis, surgical resection techniques, and management of neurofibromatosis for FRACS examination

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25

Nerve Sheath Tumors of the Spine

Visual One-Pager

Nerve sheath tumors represent 25-30% of all intradural spinal tumors, arising from Schwann cells (schwannomas, 70-80%) or nerve sheath fibroblasts (neurofibromas, 20-30%). These benign tumors present with radicular pain and progressive myelopathy. Schwannomas are typically solitary, encapsulated, and amenable to complete resection with nerve preservation, while neurofibromas are more infiltrative and associated with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Key Recognition Features:

  • Radicular pain as initial symptom (80-90% of cases)
  • Intradural extramedullary mass on MRI with contrast enhancement
  • CSF protein elevation
  • Dumbbell configuration in 15-30% (intraspinal plus paraspinal extension)

Critical Diagnostic Pathway:

  1. MRI whole spine with gadolinium (gold standard imaging)
  2. Screen for neurofibromatosis (café-au-lait spots, family history)
  3. Assess dumbbell extension with CT for bony anatomy
  4. Pre-operative neurophysiology if motor nerve root involvement

High-Yield Exam Points:

  • Schwannomas: encapsulated, eccentric to nerve root, complete resection without nerve sacrifice in 95%
  • Neurofibromas: infiltrative, involve nerve fascicles, nerve sacrifice often required, NF1 association
  • Dumbbell tumors require combined posterior laminectomy plus lateral approach (sometimes staged)
  • Intraoperative neuromonitoring for motor root identification
  • Recurrence rate less than 5% for schwannomas after gross total resection

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Spinal Nerve Root Anatomy

Understanding nerve root anatomy is critical for surgical planning and minimizing post-operative deficits:

Nerve Root Organization:

  • Dorsal (sensory) root: enters posterolateral cord
  • Ventral (motor) root: exits anterolateral cord
  • Dorsal root ganglion: sensory cell bodies, common schwannoma origin site
  • Fusion of roots forms mixed spinal nerve in foramen

Schwann Cell Distribution:

  • Schwann cells myelinate peripheral nerves
  • Present on dorsal and ventral roots distal to root entry/exit zone
  • Most schwannomas arise from dorsal (sensory) roots (90%)
  • Motor root schwannomas rare but clinically significant (10%)

Anatomical Compartments:

  • Intradural: within dural sac, most common location (65%)
  • Foraminal: within neural foramen (20%)
  • Dumbbell: both intradural and foraminal/paraspinal (15%)
  • Paraspinal: entirely extraforaminal (rare, 5%)

Regional Nerve Root Function:

Mnemonic

SAFESAFE Roots - Sacrificable vs Essential Nerve Roots

S
Sensory roots (dorsal)
Generally sacrificable with minimal morbidity - causes dermatomal numbness only
A
Arm roots C5-T1
Essential motor function - sacrifice causes significant upper limb weakness
F
Foot/leg roots L2-S1
Essential for ambulation - L5 (foot dorsiflexion), S1 (plantarflexion) critical
E
Expendable sensory roots
Above C5, T2-T12, S2 and below - can sacrifice with acceptable morbidity

Memory Hook:Keep motor roots SAFE during nerve sheath tumor resection

Cervical Roots:

  • C1-C4: neck and upper shoulder, sacrifice tolerable
  • C5: shoulder abduction (deltoid) - preserve if possible
  • C6: elbow flexion (biceps), wrist extension - preserve
  • C7: elbow extension (triceps), wrist flexion - preserve
  • C8: hand intrinsics, finger flexion - preserve
  • T1: hand intrinsics - preserve

Thoracic Roots:

  • T2-T12: intercostal muscles and dermatomal sensation
  • Generally sacrificable with minimal morbidity
  • Bilateral sacrifice can cause truncal instability
  • Unilateral sacrifice causes numbness only

Lumbar and Sacral Roots:

  • L2-L4: hip flexion, knee extension, thigh sensation - preserve
  • L5: foot dorsiflexion, great toe extension - critical for gait, preserve
  • S1: foot plantarflexion, ankle reflex - critical for gait, preserve
  • S2-S5: bladder, bowel, sexual function - preserve if possible

Tumor Pathology

Schwannoma Characteristics:

  • Origin: Schwann cells, typically from dorsal root ganglion
  • WHO Grade: I (benign)
  • Macroscopic: well-encapsulated, yellow-tan, eccentric to nerve
  • Microscopic: Antoni A (compact spindle cells) and Antoni B (loose myxoid) areas
  • Verocay bodies: palisading nuclei in Antoni A regions
  • S100 immunostaining: diffusely positive
  • Growth pattern: slow-growing, displaces nerve fascicles

Neurofibroma Characteristics:

  • Origin: nerve sheath fibroblasts and Schwann cells
  • WHO Grade: I (benign), but potential for malignant transformation (5-10% in NF1)
  • Macroscopic: fusiform enlargement of nerve, not encapsulated
  • Microscopic: mix of Schwann cells, fibroblasts, perineural cells
  • S100 immunostaining: focally positive
  • Growth pattern: infiltrative within nerve fascicles
  • Association: neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) in 40-50% of spinal neurofibromas

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST):

  • Rare (less than 5% of nerve sheath tumors)
  • WHO Grade: III-IV
  • High association with NF1 (50-70% of cases)
  • Rapid growth, pain, neurological deficit
  • Poor prognosis even with aggressive treatment
  • Wide en bloc resection required

Pathophysiology of Clinical Presentation

Radicular Pain Mechanism:

  • Tumor compression and traction on nerve root
  • Inflammation and chemical mediators
  • Worse with Valsalva, coughing, bending
  • Often nocturnal (recumbent position increases intraspinal pressure)

Myelopathy Development:

  • Progressive cord compression from ventral or lateral tumor
  • Vascular compromise of spinal cord
  • Late manifestation (tumor often large by this stage)
  • Indicates urgent surgical intervention

Natural History:

  • Schwannomas: slow growth (1-2 mm per year), may remain asymptomatic for years
  • Neurofibromas: variable growth, faster in NF1 patients
  • Malignant transformation: rare in schwannomas (less than 1%), higher in NF1 neurofibromas (5-10%)

Clinical Presentation

Symptom Progression

Early Stage (Radicular Pain Predominant):

  • Unilateral dermatomal pain in 80-90% of patients
  • Lancinating or burning character
  • Worse with movement, Valsalva, recumbency
  • Partial relief with specific positions
  • May precede imaging findings by months to years

Intermediate Stage (Motor and Sensory Deficits):

  • Dermatomal paresthesias and numbness
  • Progressive motor weakness in myotomal distribution
  • Atrophy of affected muscles
  • Reflex asymmetry or loss
  • Gait disturbance if lower limb involvement

Late Stage (Myelopathy):

  • Bilateral weakness below tumor level
  • Spasticity and hyperreflexia
  • Sensory level
  • Bladder and bowel dysfunction
  • Indicates significant cord compression requiring urgent surgery

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • CafĂ©-au-lait spots (6 or more, greater than 5 mm prepubertal, greater than 15 mm postpubertal): NF1
  • Axillary or inguinal freckling: NF1
  • Subcutaneous neurofibromas: NF1
  • Lisch nodules (iris hamartomas): NF1
  • Skeletal abnormalities: scoliosis (NF1-associated dystrophic curve)

Motor Examination:

  • Myotomal weakness pattern
  • Muscle atrophy (chronic denervation)
  • Fasciculations (lower motor neuron)
  • Pyramidal signs if myelopathy (hyperreflexia, spasticity, Babinski)

Sensory Examination:

  • Dermatomal sensory loss (pinprick and light touch)
  • Posterior column dysfunction (vibration, proprioception) if cord compression
  • Sensory level if myelopathy present

Special Tests:

  • Straight leg raise: positive if lumbar or sacral root involvement
  • Spurling test: positive if cervical root compression
  • Hoffman and Babinski signs: if myelopathy present

Neurofibromatosis Screening

Mnemonic

CRISPNF1 CRISP Diagnostic Criteria (NIH Consensus)

C
Café-au-lait macules
6 or more, greater than 5 mm prepubertal or greater than 15 mm postpubertal
R
Relative with NF1
First-degree relative (parent, sibling, child) with NF1
I
Iris hamartomas (Lisch nodules)
2 or more Lisch nodules on slit-lamp examination
S
Skinfold freckling
Axillary or inguinal freckling
P
Plexiform neurofibroma or 2+ neurofibromas
One plexiform neurofibroma or 2 or more neurofibromas of any type

Memory Hook:NF1 diagnosis requires 2 or more CRISP criteria

Additional NF1 Features:

  • Optic pathway glioma
  • Distinctive osseous lesion: sphenoid dysplasia, long bone cortical thinning
  • Learning disabilities and attention deficit
  • Increased risk of malignancy: MPNST, pheochromocytoma, breast cancer

NF1 and Spinal Tumors:

  • Multiple nerve sheath tumors (schwannomas and neurofibromas)
  • Paraspinal plexiform neurofibromas
  • Dystrophic scoliosis (short segment, severe angulation)
  • Dural ectasia
  • 5-10% risk of malignant transformation (MPNST)

Investigations

MRI Imaging (Gold Standard)

Standard Protocol:

  • Whole spine sagittal and axial sequences
  • T1-weighted pre- and post-gadolinium
  • T2-weighted for cord signal
  • STIR sequences for edema and bone involvement
  • Thin cuts (3 mm) through tumor

Schwannoma MRI Characteristics:

  • Location: intradural extramedullary (65%), foraminal (20%), dumbbell (15%)
  • Shape: ovoid or round, well-defined margins
  • T1 signal: iso to hypointense relative to cord
  • T2 signal: hyperintense (may have hypointense areas if fibrosis)
  • Enhancement: intense homogeneous enhancement (small tumors) or heterogeneous (large tumors with cystic degeneration)
  • Target sign: central low T2 signal with peripheral high signal (specific but uncommon)
  • CSF cap: crescent of CSF around tumor (extramedullary location)

Neurofibroma MRI Characteristics:

  • Location: often foraminal or paraspinal
  • Shape: fusiform nerve enlargement
  • T1 signal: isointense
  • T2 signal: very hyperintense (myxoid matrix)
  • Enhancement: heterogeneous enhancement
  • Central low signal on T2: target sign (more common than schwannoma)
  • Often multiple tumors if NF1

Dumbbell Tumor Features:

  • Intraspinal component: intradural extramedullary mass
  • Foraminal component: widened neural foramen (best seen on axial CT)
  • Paraspinal component: soft tissue mass lateral to spine
  • Hourglass configuration at foramen
  • May cause bony erosion and facet destruction

CT Imaging

Indications:

  • Assessment of bony anatomy in dumbbell tumors
  • Surgical planning for foraminal enlargement
  • Evaluation of facet joint involvement
  • Detection of bony erosion or scalloping

CT Findings:

  • Widened neural foramen
  • Facet erosion or destruction
  • Vertebral body scalloping
  • Paraspinal soft tissue mass
  • Calcification rare (if present, consider meningioma)

Differential Diagnosis Imaging

MRI Differentiation of Intradural Extramedullary Tumors

FeatureSchwannomaNeurofibromaMeningiomaEpendymoma (Filum)

Laboratory and Additional Tests

Pre-Operative Workup:

  • Full blood count, renal and liver function
  • Coagulation profile
  • Group and screen (blood products rarely needed)
  • ECG and anesthesia assessment

CSF Analysis (rarely needed):

  • Elevated protein (60-80% of cases)
  • Normal glucose and cell count
  • Froin syndrome: very high protein (greater than 1000 mg/dL), xanthochromia, coagulation
  • Indicates complete CSF block from large tumor

Neurophysiology:

  • EMG and nerve conduction studies: localize root involvement
  • Pre-operative motor and sensory nerve conduction baselines
  • Intraoperative monitoring: SSEP for sensory roots, triggered EMG for motor roots

Management

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications:

  • Progressive neurological deficit
  • Myelopathy (cord compression)
  • Intractable radicular pain affecting quality of life
  • Suspicion of malignancy (rapid growth, NF1 patient)

Relative Indications:

  • Asymptomatic tumor with radiological progression
  • Large tumor (greater than 2 cm) even if minimally symptomatic
  • Dumbbell tumor with foraminal widening
  • Patient preference after discussion of natural history

Observation Criteria:

  • Small asymptomatic tumor (less than 1 cm)
  • Elderly or medically unfit patient
  • Multiple tumors in NF1 (prioritize symptomatic lesions)
  • Serial MRI every 6-12 months to assess growth

Surgical Approaches and Techniques

Nerve Root Preservation Strategies

Pre-Operative Planning:

  • Review MRI to determine root of origin
  • Predict motor versus sensory based on location
  • Discuss potential for root sacrifice and expected deficit

Intraoperative Root Identification:

  • Triggered EMG stimulation of proximal root
  • Low threshold response (less than 0.5 mA) indicates motor root
  • High threshold or no response indicates sensory root
  • Stimulate distal root after tumor resection to confirm function

Nerve Preservation Techniques:

  • Schwannoma: eccentric nerve displacement, fascicles preserved on capsule
  • Sharp dissection along capsule preserving fascicles
  • If motor root origin, attempt intracapsular debulking to preserve root
  • Accept subtotal resection if nerve preservation critical

Root Sacrifice Decision Algorithm:

  • Sensory root (C1-C4, T2-T12, S3-S5): safe to sacrifice for GTR
  • Motor root (C5-T1, L2-S2): attempt preservation
  • If motor root completely non-functional (no EMG, severe atrophy), sacrifice acceptable
  • Bilateral motor root sacrifice never acceptable

Complications and Management

Mnemonic

DEFICITSDEFICITS After Nerve Sheath Tumor Resection

D
Dermatomal numbness
Expected if sensory root sacrificed, usually well tolerated
E
Epidural hematoma
Rare (1-2%), presents with acute neurological deterioration
F
Fistula (CSF)
Leak from dural closure: 2-5%, manage with bed rest or re-exploration
I
Infection
Wound infection 2-3%, meningitis rare (less than 1%)
C
Chronic radicular pain
Persistent or new radicular pain: 5-10%, usually improves over months
I
Instability
Spinal instability if greater than 50% bilateral facet resection
T
Tumor recurrence
Schwannoma less than 5%, neurofibroma 10-15%, MPNST high
S
Sensorimotor deficit
Weakness or numbness from nerve injury: depends on root sacrificed

Memory Hook:Monitor for DEFICITS after nerve sheath tumor surgery

Early Complications:

CSF Leak:

  • Incidence: 2-5% of cases
  • Presents with wound drainage or positional headache
  • Conservative management: bed rest, acetazolamide, pressure dressing
  • Surgical repair if persistent beyond 5-7 days or large volume leak

Epidural Hematoma:

  • Incidence: 1-2%
  • Presents with acute neurological deterioration, severe pain
  • Urgent MRI confirms diagnosis
  • Emergency surgical evacuation if cord compression

Infection:

  • Superficial wound infection: 2-3%, treated with antibiotics and local wound care
  • Deep infection or meningitis: less than 1%, requires surgical washout and IV antibiotics

New Neurological Deficit:

  • Expected deficit from planned root sacrifice
  • Unexpected deficit: motor weakness, suggests nerve injury during dissection
  • Management: high-dose steroids, close observation, rehabilitation

Late Complications:

Spinal Instability:

  • Risk factors: bilateral facetectomy greater than 50%, multilevel laminectomy, pre-existing scoliosis
  • Presents with mechanical back pain, progressive deformity
  • Prevention: prophylactic fusion if high-risk facet resection
  • Management: posterior instrumented fusion if symptomatic

Tumor Recurrence:

  • Schwannoma: less than 5% after GTR, higher if subtotal resection
  • Neurofibroma: 10-15% recurrence, higher in NF1 patients
  • MPNST: high recurrence even after GTR, poor prognosis
  • Surveillance: MRI at 3 months, 1 year, then every 2 years for schwannoma; annually for neurofibroma and NF1

Chronic Pain:

  • Persistent or new radicular pain: 5-10% of patients
  • Mechanisms: nerve injury, epidural scarring, arachnoiditis
  • Management: multimodal analgesia, neuropathic pain medications, pain clinic referral

Evidence Base

Surgical Outcomes and Nerve Preservation in Spinal Schwannomas

III
Key Findings:
  • Gross total resection (GTR) achieved in 94% of cases
  • Nerve root preservation: 85% overall, higher for motor roots (92%) vs sensory roots (78%)
  • Post-operative neurological improvement: 68% of patients
  • New permanent neurological deficit: 8% (mostly from planned root sacrifice)
  • Recurrence rate: 4.3% at mean 6.8-year follow-up
  • Factors predicting GTR: non-dumbbell configuration, schwannoma vs neurofibroma
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Dumbbell Tumor Management and Outcomes

III
Key Findings:
  • Single-stage posterior approach feasible for 62% of dumbbell tumors
  • Combined or staged approach required for 38% (large extraforaminal component greater than 3 cm)
  • GTR achieved in 87% overall, 91% for posterior alone, 82% for combined approach
  • Spinal instability requiring fusion: 12% overall, 24% if bilateral facetectomy
  • Neurological complications: 15% transient, 6% permanent
  • Recurrence rate: 5.8% at mean 4.2 years
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Neurofibromas vs Schwannomas: Surgical Outcomes

III
Key Findings:
  • GTR rate: 95% schwannomas vs 74% neurofibromas (p less than 0.01)
  • Nerve preservation: 86% schwannomas vs 58% neurofibromas (p less than 0.01)
  • Recurrence: 3.1% schwannomas vs 14% neurofibromas at 5 years
  • NF1-associated neurofibromas: higher recurrence (21%) and malignant transformation (7%)
  • Functional outcomes: better for schwannomas due to higher nerve preservation
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

III
Key Findings:
  • NF1 association in 54% of cases
  • 5-year overall survival: 34%
  • Wide en bloc resection: 48% achieved, improved survival vs intralesional (5-year OS 52% vs 18%, p=0.01)
  • Adjuvant radiotherapy: improved local control (73% vs 41% at 2 years)
  • Chemotherapy: no significant survival benefit
  • Adverse prognostic factors: NF1, size greater than 5 cm, high grade, positive margins
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Nerve Sheath Tumor Surgery

III
Key Findings:
  • Motor root identification: 98% sensitivity using stimulation threshold less than 0.5 mA
  • Nerve preservation guided by EMG: 89% vs 78% without monitoring (p=0.04)
  • False positive rate (sensory root identified as motor): 4%
  • Post-operative motor deficit: 6% with monitoring vs 15% without (p=0.03)
  • EMG mapping changed surgical plan in 23% of cases
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Scenario 1: Lumbar Schwannoma with Radicular Pain

EXAMINER

""

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a symptomatic nerve sheath tumor, most likely schwannoma based on imaging characteristics, causing L5 radiculopathy with motor deficit. Surgical resection is indicated given progressive neurological deficit. The goal is gross total resection with attempted nerve root preservation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnosis: Intradural extramedullary tumor, schwannoma most likely (well-defined, homogeneous enhancement)
L5 root involvement: critical for ambulation (foot dorsiflexion), attempt preservation if feasible
Surgical approach: posterior midline, left hemilaminectomy L4-L5, preserve facet joints
Intraoperative neuromonitoring: triggered EMG to confirm L5 motor root, guide preservation
Resection strategy: circumferential dissection around tumor capsule, identify nerve root displaced over tumor, preserve fascicles, stimulate root to confirm motor function
If root is origin: schwannomas are usually eccentric, nerve fascicles on capsule surface can be preserved in 90% of cases
If root non-functional (confirmed by EMG): may sacrifice for GTR
Post-operative expectations: existing foot drop may improve (68% improvement rate), slight increase in numbness expected
Recurrence risk: less than 5% with GTR, surveillance MRI at 3 months and 1 year
COMMON TRAPS
âś—Sacrificing L5 root without functional assessment - critical for gait, attempt preservation even if partial function
âś—Aggressive dissection without nerve monitoring - risks converting partial to complete deficit
âś—Inadequate consent discussion - must warn about potential worsening of foot drop
âś—Over-resecting facet joint - L4-L5 instability, may require fusion
âś—Assuming all nerve sheath tumors are schwannomas - neurofibromas more infiltrative, lower GTR rate
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if triggered EMG shows low threshold response (motor root) but root is severely thinned over tumor? (Attempt nerve preservation with subtotal resection or intracapsular debulking; functional root preservation preferable to GTR with deficit)"
"How would your approach differ if this were a dumbbell tumor with 4 cm paraspinal extension? (Consider combined approach or staged procedure; posterior with facetectomy and fusion for moderate, retroperitoneal approach for large paraspinal component)"
"What if histology returned as neurofibroma instead? (Screen for NF1, closer surveillance for recurrence, discuss higher recurrence risk 10-15% vs 5% for schwannoma)"
"If patient had multiple café-au-lait spots and family history of NF1, how does this change management? (Diagnose NF1, expect multiple tumors, prioritize symptomatic lesions, annual surveillance, genetic counseling, warn about malignant transformation risk 5-10%)"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Scenario 2: Cervical Dumbbell Schwannoma

EXAMINER

""

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a cervical dumbbell schwannoma causing C5 radiculopathy. The C5 root is critical for shoulder function (deltoid, biceps), making nerve preservation a priority. The large paraspinal component and facet erosion require careful surgical planning, likely posterior approach with facetectomy and possible fusion.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Dumbbell configuration: intraspinal plus paraspinal components connected through foramen
C5 root: essential motor function (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion), must attempt preservation
Pre-operative imaging: review CT for bony anatomy, assess facet involvement and pedicle integrity
Surgical approach: posterior midline, right hemilaminectomy C4-C5, medial facetectomy to access foramen
Foraminal widening: high-speed drill to enlarge foramen, visualize entire tumor
Resection sequence: remove intraspinal component first, then deliver paraspinal component through widened foramen
Nerve monitoring: triggered EMG to identify C5 root, assess function after resection
Facet resection: if greater than 50% of facet joint removed, consider prophylactic lateral mass screw fixation C4-C6
Post-operative care: hard cervical collar for 6 weeks if fusion performed
COMMON TRAPS
âś—Attempting resection without adequate foraminal widening - incomplete resection, nerve injury
âś—Excessive facet resection without fusion - risks cervical kyphosis and instability
âś—Sacrificing C5 root - causes significant disability (cannot abduct shoulder, weak elbow flexion)
âś—Not reviewing CT pre-operatively - unprepared for bony work, inadequate instrumentation
âś—Damage to vertebral artery - lies anterior to foramen, at risk during foraminal work; must identify and protect
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If the paraspinal component was 6 cm extending to carotid sheath, how would you approach it? (Consider combined or staged approach: anterolateral Henry approach for paraspinal component first, mobilize carotid sheath and vertebral artery; then posterior approach for intraspinal)"
"What are the indications for prophylactic fusion after facetectomy? (Greater than 50% unilateral facet, any bilateral facet resection, pre-existing instability, multilevel laminectomy)"
"How do you protect the vertebral artery during foraminal work? (Identify V2 segment in foramen on CT pre-op, use ultrasonic bone scalpel or fine Kerrison for foraminal bone removal, micro-Doppler to locate vessel, stay posterior and inferior)"
"What would you do if nerve root stimulation showed no motor response (non-functional C5)? (May sacrifice root for GTR, but counsel patient about expected permanent shoulder and elbow weakness; consider nerve transfer for deltoid reinnervation post-operatively)"

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Nerve Sheath Tumors
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Nerve Sheath TumorsCredit: OrthoVellum

High-Yield Exam Summary

Quick Recognition

  • •Radicular pain + intradural extramedullary enhancing mass on MRI = nerve sheath tumor
  • •Schwannoma 70-80% (well-defined, homogeneous enhancement)
  • •Neurofibroma 20-30% (infiltrative, very hyperintense T2, NF1 association)
  • •Dumbbell 15-30% (widened foramen on CT)

Schwannoma vs Neurofibroma

  • •Schwannoma: encapsulated, eccentric to nerve, nerve fascicles on capsule surface
  • •Schwannoma: GTR 95%, nerve preservation 85%, recurrence less than 5%
  • •Neurofibroma: infiltrative, within fascicles
  • •Neurofibroma: GTR 74%, nerve preservation 58%, recurrence 10-15%, NF1 association 40-50%

Critical Nerve Roots

  • •MUST preserve: C5-T1 (arm function), L2-S1 (leg function especially L5 foot dorsiflexion, S1 plantarflexion)
  • •Can sacrifice: C1-C4 (neck sensation), T2-T12 (intercostal, truncal sensation), S3-S5 (if unilateral)
  • •Never sacrifice bilateral motor roots

Surgical Approach

  • •Standard: posterior hemilaminectomy on tumor side, preserve facets less than 50%
  • •Dumbbell less than 3 cm: posterior with medial facetectomy, widen foramen
  • •Dumbbell greater than 3 cm: combined anterior (paraspinal) + posterior (intraspinal) or single-stage with facetectomy + fusion

Resection Technique

  • •Schwannoma: circumferential dissection along capsule, nerve fascicles displaced on surface
  • •Preserve fascicles, en bloc removal, GTR achievable 95%
  • •Neurofibroma: infiltrative, attempt intracapsular debulking, nerve preservation priority
  • •Accept STR if motor root involved

Neuromonitoring

  • •Triggered EMG essential for root identification
  • •Stimulation threshold less than 0.5 mA = motor root (preserve)
  • •High threshold or no response = sensory root (sacrificable if non-essential)
  • •Stimulate proximal and distal to tumor
  • •Changes surgical plan in 23% of cases

Dumbbell Tumor Keys

  • •CT for bony anatomy (widened foramen, facet erosion)
  • •Widen foramen with high-speed drill
  • •Remove intraspinal component first, deliver paraspinal through foramen
  • •If large paraspinal (greater than 3 cm), consider anterior approach
  • •Fusion if greater than 50% facet resection

NF1 Screening

  • •NIH criteria (need 2+): 6+ cafĂ©-au-lait macules, axillary/inguinal freckling, 2+ Lisch nodules (iris)
  • •First-degree relative with NF1, plexiform neurofibroma or 2+ neurofibromas
  • •NF1: multiple tumors, prioritize symptomatic, annual surveillance
  • •5-10% MPNST risk

Expected Outcomes

  • •GTR 94% overall
  • •Neurological improvement 68%
  • •New deficit 8% (mostly planned root sacrifice)
  • •Recurrence: schwannoma less than 5%, neurofibroma 10-15%, MPNST high
  • •Surveillance: MRI 3 months, 1 year, then every 2 years (annually for NF1)

Viva Talking Points

  • •Intraoperative EMG improves nerve preservation (89% vs 78%)
  • •Schwannoma nerve preservation achievable in 85-90% due to eccentric location
  • •Dumbbell tumors: posterior approach for most, anterior/combined if large paraspinal
  • •NF1 changes prognosis: higher recurrence, malignant transformation risk
  • •MPNST: wide en bloc resection + XRT, poor prognosis (5-year OS 34%)

References

  1. Seppälä MT, Haltia MJ, Sankila RJ, et al. Long-term outcome after removal of spinal schwannoma: a clinicopathological study of 187 cases. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(4):621-626.

  2. Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H, et al. Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2004;61(1):34-43.

  3. Jeon JH, Hwang HS, Jeong JH, et al. Spinal schwannoma; analysis of 40 cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;43(3):135-138.

  4. Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer. 1986;57(10):2006-2021.

  5. Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(2):248-264.

  6. Klekamp J, Samii M. Surgery of Spinal Tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007.

  7. Kim P, Ebersold MJ, Onofrio BM, Quast LM. Surgery of spinal nerve schwannoma. Risk of neurological deficit after resection of involved root. J Neurosurg. 1989;71(6):810-814.

This comprehensive topic provides Gold Standard coverage of nerve sheath tumors for FRACS examination preparation, emphasizing surgical decision-making, technique, and nerve preservation strategies.

Quick Stats
Reading Time81 min
Related Topics

Atlantoaxial Arthritis

Baastrup Disease (Kissing Spine Syndrome)

Bertolotti Syndrome (Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra)

Cervical Facet Arthropathy