Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Paediatric Imaging: Special Considerations

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Paediatric Imaging: Special Considerations

Comprehensive guide to paediatric musculoskeletal imaging including ossification centres, growth plate injuries, normal variants, and radiation safety considerations for fellowship exam preparation.

High Yield
complete
Updated: 2026-01-16
High Yield Overview

Paediatric Imaging: Special Considerations

—Growth Plate Closure
14-16Girls y, Boys 16-18y
—Bone Age Assessment
3Greulich-Pyle or TW
—Paediatric CT Dose
50-75%Reduce vs adult
—MRI Sedation Age
6Typically < years

Salter-Harris Classification

Type I: Through physis (SALTER)

Type II: Above physis (metaphysis) - most common

Type III: Lower (epiphysis)

Type IV: Through all (metaphysis + physis + epiphysis)

Type V: Crush/compression of physis

Key: Higher types = worse prognosis for growth disturbance

Critical Must-Knows

  • Ossification centres appear and fuse in predictable sequences
  • CRITOE mnemonic for elbow ossification (ages 1,3,5,7,9,11)
  • Salter-Harris classification for physeal injuries (Types I-V)
  • ALARA principle - minimise radiation especially in children
  • Normal variants mimic pathology: accessory ossicles, growth plates

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Always compare with contralateral side when uncertain
  • "
    Growth plate injuries may be radiographically occult - suspect clinically
  • "
    Toddler's fracture: spiral tibial fracture, often subtle
  • "
    Plastic deformity unique to paediatric bone
  • "
    MRI preferred for suspected physeal bar or AVN

Exam Warning

Paediatric imaging questions commonly test: ossification centre sequences (especially elbow), Salter-Harris classification interpretation, and distinguishing normal variants from pathology. Always mention radiation safety and ALARA when discussing paediatric CT.

Ossification Centre Development

Understanding the sequence and timing of ossification centre appearance is fundamental to interpreting paediatric radiographs. Secondary ossification centres appear at predictable ages and their absence or premature appearance may indicate pathology.

Mnemonic

C-R-I-T-O-ECRITOE - Elbow Ossification Centres

C
C = Capitellum (1 year)
R
R = Radial head (3 years)
I
I = Internal (medial) epicondyle (5 years)
T
T = Trochlea (7 years)
O
O = Olecranon (9 years)
E
E = External (lateral) epicondyle (11 years)

Memory Hook:Medial epicondyle ALWAYS ossifies before trochlea - if medial epicondyle appears 'absent' with visible trochlea, suspect avulsed fragment trapped in joint

Pelvic Ossification Centres

StructureAge of AppearanceClinical Relevance
Femoral head4-6 monthsAbsent in DDH screen
Greater trochanter4 yearsMay mimic fracture
Lesser trochanter11-12 yearsAvulsion in athletes
Triradiate cartilageCloses 12-14 yearsAcetabular development
Iliac crest apophysis13-15 yearsRisser staging for scoliosis

Knee Ossification Centres

StructureAppearanceFusion
Distal femoral epiphysis36 weeks gestation16-18 years
Proximal tibial epiphysisBirth16-18 years
Patella3-5 yearsBipartite in 2%
Tibial tubercle10-12 yearsOsgood-Schlatter site

Salter-Harris Classification

Salter-Harris Classification of Physeal Injuries

TypeDescriptionFrequencyGrowth Disturbance RiskMnemonic
Type ISeparation through physis only6%Rare (unless blood supply)SALTER = Slip Along
Type IIThrough physis + metaphyseal fragment75%RareAbove (metaphysis)
Type IIIThrough physis + epiphyseal fragment8%Moderate - involves jointLower (epiphysis)
Type IVThrough metaphysis, physis, and epiphysis10%High - disrupts germinal layerThrough Everything
Type VCrush injury to physis1%Very High - often missed initiallyERasure (compression)

Type V Characteristics

Often normal initial X-ray. Diagnosed retrospectively when growth arrest occurs. Mechanism: axial loading. Common sites: ankle, knee. MRI may show physeal widening/signal change acutely.

Rang Type VI

Added classification: peripheral physeal injury (e.g., lawnmower injury). Causes localised growth disturbance and angular deformity due to peripheral bridge formation.

Normal Variants vs Pathology

Common Normal Variants Mimicking Pathology

VariantLocationKey FeaturesDifferentiation from Pathology
Bipartite patellaSuperolateral patellaSmooth, well-corticated marginsBilateral in 50%, no oedema on MRI
Os trigonumPosterior talusRound, smooth accessory ossicleFused by 15y; if symptomatic = os trigonum syndrome
Accessory navicularMedial footType II most symptomaticSynchondrosis may be painful with overuse
Irregular ossificationDistal femoral epiphysisIrregular, sclerotic appearanceNormal finding age 2-8, no treatment needed
Sinding-Larsen-JohanssonInferior patella poleFragmentation of poleTraction apophysitis, not avulsion

Rule of Twos

If in doubt, get comparison views of the contralateral side. Bilateral symmetry suggests normal variant; unilateral findings warrant further investigation.

Radiation Safety in Children

Children have 10-15x higher lifetime radiation-induced cancer risk compared to adults due to longer life expectancy and actively dividing cells. ALARA principle is paramount.

Paediatric Radiation Dose Reduction Strategies

StrategyImplementationDose Reduction
Size-based protocolsReduce mAs/kVp based on weight50-75%
Reduce number of phasesSingle phase CT rather than multiphasic60-70%
Limit scan coverageScan only area of interestVariable
Shield radiosensitive organsGonadal/thyroid shields when possible90% to shielded area
Consider alternativesMRI or ultrasound instead of CT100% (no radiation)
Mnemonic

A-L-A-R-AALARA Principle

A
A = As
L
L = Low
A
A = As
R
R = Reasonably
A
A = Achievable

Memory Hook:Document justification for any CT in children. Consider if ultrasound or MRI could answer the clinical question.

MRI Considerations in Children

Preferred Over CT

Physeal/epiphyseal injuries, Osteomyelitis assessment, Occult hip pathology (Perthes, SCFE), Soft tissue masses, Spinal dysraphism, AVN staging

Unique Paediatric MRI Features

Red marrow signal normal until 25y (low T1, high T2 STIR), Cartilaginous epiphyses show intermediate signal, Unfused physes appear as high T2 signal band

MRI Sedation Requirements by Age

Age GroupTypical RequirementDuration Tolerance
Less than 3 monthsFeed-and-wrap technique30-45 min
3 months to 6 yearsSedation usually requiredVariable
6-8 yearsDepends on child cooperationMay manage with coaching
Greater than 8 yearsRarely need sedationCooperative for most scans

Common Paediatric Fracture Patterns

Unique Paediatric Fracture Types

Fracture TypeMechanismImaging FeaturesManagement Implications
Torus (buckle)Axial compressionBuckling of cortex, intact periosteumStable, splint 3-4 weeks
GreenstickBending forceIncomplete fracture, one cortex intactMay need completion to reduce
Plastic deformityBending forceBowing without visible fracture lineUnique to children, may need correction
Toddler's fractureRotational forceSpiral tibial fracture, often subtleHigh clinical suspicion, often occult
Supracondylar humerusFOOSHDisplaced posterior fat pad, sail signCheck for neurovascular injury

Toddler's Fracture Key Points

Age 9 months to 3 years. Non-displaced spiral fracture of tibial diaphysis. May be radiographically occult initially. Repeat X-ray at 7-10 days shows periosteal reaction. MRI confirms diagnosis if needed.

Bone Age Assessment

Bone Age Assessment Methods

MethodTechniqueAdvantagesLimitations
Greulich-PyleCompare left hand/wrist to atlasQuick, widely usedInter-observer variability
Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3)Score individual bones mathematicallyMore reproducibleTime-consuming
Automated (AI-based)Computer analysis of hand X-rayConsistent, rapidRequires software, validation ongoing

Advanced Bone Age Causes

Hyperthyroidism, Growth hormone excess, Precocious puberty, Obesity, CAH (congenital adrenal hyperplasia)

Delayed Bone Age Causes

Hypothyroidism, Growth hormone deficiency, Constitutional delay, Chronic illness, Malnutrition, Turner syndrome

Hip Imaging in Children

DDH Imaging by Age

AgeModality of ChoiceKey Measurements
Less than 4 monthsUltrasound (Graf method)Alpha angle greater than 60° normal, Beta angle less than 55° normal
4-6 monthsUltrasound or X-rayTransition period, depends on ossific nucleus
Greater than 6 monthsX-ray (AP pelvis)Hilgenreiner, Perkin, Shenton lines; acetabular index

Perthes MRI Features

Early: Decreased T1 signal in femoral head (loss of marrow fat). Intermediate: Physeal irregularity, epiphyseal collapse. Late: Coxa magna, flattening, incongruity. MRI superior for extent of involvement and prognosis (lateral pillar).

SCFE Radiographic Signs

Frog-lateral view most sensitive. Klein's line: line along superior femoral neck fails to intersect epiphysis. Widened/irregular physis. Steel sign (double density). Always image BOTH hips (bilateral in 25%).

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 4-year-old presents with elbow pain after a fall. X-ray shows a visible trochlea but you cannot identify the medial epicondyle ossification centre."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a displaced medial epicondyle avulsion fracture with the fragment trapped in the joint. Using CRITOE, the medial epicondyle (I) should ossify before the trochlea (T). If the trochlea is visible but the medial epicondyle is 'absent', the epicondyle must be displaced. The fragment is likely incarcerated in the joint space, appearing as an intra-articular ossific density.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
CRITOE sequence: medial epicondyle (5y) before trochlea (7y)
Absent expected ossification centre = displaced fragment
Medial epicondyle avulsion associated with elbow dislocations
Treatment: Open reduction if fragment in joint
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming normal anatomy without applying CRITOE
✗Missing incarcerated fragment on poorly positioned films
✗Not checking for associated ulnar nerve injury
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 2-year-old presents with refusal to weight-bear for 2 days. Initial X-rays appear normal. What is your differential diagnosis and management plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The most likely diagnosis is a toddler's fracture - a non-displaced spiral fracture of the tibial diaphysis that may be radiographically occult initially. This is common in children aged 9 months to 3 years. Management includes immobilisation in a below-knee cast and repeat X-ray in 7-10 days looking for periosteal reaction. If diagnosis is urgent or uncertain, MRI will show the fracture and marrow oedema.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Toddler's fracture: common in 9 months to 3 years
Non-displaced spiral tibial diaphysis fracture
Often occult on initial X-ray
Periosteal reaction visible at 7-10 days
MRI confirms if needed urgently
COMMON TRAPS
✗Dismissing symptoms due to normal X-ray
✗Not considering NAI (non-accidental injury) in differential
✗Ordering CT (radiation, may still miss non-displaced fracture)
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are asked to review a CT scan of a 6-year-old with abdominal trauma. The radiologist mentions incidental bone lesions. The parent asks about radiation exposure."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would acknowledge the legitimate concern about radiation in children. Children have 10-15 times higher lifetime cancer risk from radiation compared to adults due to longer life expectancy and actively dividing cells. However, if the CT was clinically indicated for trauma, the immediate benefit outweighs theoretical long-term risk. I would explain that paediatric protocols should reduce dose by 50-75% compared to adults using size-based protocols. The ALARA principle guides all imaging decisions in children.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Children have 10-15x higher radiation cancer risk vs adults
ALARA principle: As Low As Reasonably Achievable
Paediatric protocols reduce dose 50-75%
Size-based mA adjustment, limit coverage, single phase
Document justification for CT in children
COMMON TRAPS
✗Dismissing parental concerns
✗Not knowing paediatric dose reduction strategies
✗Unable to justify CT indication

Paediatric Imaging Essentials

High-Yield Exam Summary

CRITOE Elbow Ossification

  • •Capitellum: 1 year
  • •Radial head: 3 years
  • •Internal (medial) epicondyle: 5 years
  • •Trochlea: 7 years
  • •Olecranon: 9 years
  • •External (lateral) epicondyle: 11 years

Salter-Harris (SALTER)

  • •Type I: Slip Along (physis only) - 6%
  • •Type II: Above (metaphysis) - 75%, most common
  • •Type III: Lower (epiphysis) - 8%, involves joint
  • •Type IV: Through Everything - 10%, highest risk
  • •Type V: Erasure (crush) - 1%, often missed

Radiation Safety

  • •Children: 10-15x lifetime cancer risk vs adults
  • •ALARA: As Low As Reasonably Achievable
  • •Reduce paediatric CT dose 50-75%
  • •Consider US/MRI alternatives first
  • •Shield gonads/thyroid when possible

Common Traps

  • •Missing entrapped medial epicondyle (CRITOE)
  • •Normal X-ray doesn't exclude toddler's fracture
  • •Bipartite patella is bilateral in 50%
  • •Always image BOTH hips in SCFE
  • •Normal variants: compare contralateral side
Quick Stats
Reading Time38 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • ACSQHC Paediatric Standards
  • eTG Guidelines
Related Topics

MRI Imaging Principles

Plain Radiography Principles

Fluoroscopy Principles

Ankle & Foot Imaging: Systematic Interpretation