Paediatric Imaging: Special Considerations
Salter-Harris Classification
Type I: Through physis (SALTER)
Type II: Above physis (metaphysis) - most common
Type III: Lower (epiphysis)
Type IV: Through all (metaphysis + physis + epiphysis)
Type V: Crush/compression of physis
Key: Higher types = worse prognosis for growth disturbance
Critical Must-Knows
- Ossification centres appear and fuse in predictable sequences
- CRITOE mnemonic for elbow ossification (ages 1,3,5,7,9,11)
- Salter-Harris classification for physeal injuries (Types I-V)
- ALARA principle - minimise radiation especially in children
- Normal variants mimic pathology: accessory ossicles, growth plates
Examiner's Pearls
- "Always compare with contralateral side when uncertain
- "Growth plate injuries may be radiographically occult - suspect clinically
- "Toddler's fracture: spiral tibial fracture, often subtle
- "Plastic deformity unique to paediatric bone
- "MRI preferred for suspected physeal bar or AVN
Exam Warning
Paediatric imaging questions commonly test: ossification centre sequences (especially elbow), Salter-Harris classification interpretation, and distinguishing normal variants from pathology. Always mention radiation safety and ALARA when discussing paediatric CT.
Ossification Centre Development
Understanding the sequence and timing of ossification centre appearance is fundamental to interpreting paediatric radiographs. Secondary ossification centres appear at predictable ages and their absence or premature appearance may indicate pathology.
C-R-I-T-O-ECRITOE - Elbow Ossification Centres
Memory Hook:Medial epicondyle ALWAYS ossifies before trochlea - if medial epicondyle appears 'absent' with visible trochlea, suspect avulsed fragment trapped in joint
Salter-Harris Classification
Salter-Harris Classification of Physeal Injuries
| Type | Description | Frequency | Growth Disturbance Risk | Mnemonic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Separation through physis only | 6% | Rare (unless blood supply) | SALTER = Slip Along |
| Type II | Through physis + metaphyseal fragment | 75% | Rare | Above (metaphysis) |
| Type III | Through physis + epiphyseal fragment | 8% | Moderate - involves joint | Lower (epiphysis) |
| Type IV | Through metaphysis, physis, and epiphysis | 10% | High - disrupts germinal layer | Through Everything |
| Type V | Crush injury to physis | 1% | Very High - often missed initially | ERasure (compression) |
Type V Characteristics
Rang Type VI
Normal Variants vs Pathology
Common Normal Variants Mimicking Pathology
| Variant | Location | Key Features | Differentiation from Pathology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bipartite patella | Superolateral patella | Smooth, well-corticated margins | Bilateral in 50%, no oedema on MRI |
| Os trigonum | Posterior talus | Round, smooth accessory ossicle | Fused by 15y; if symptomatic = os trigonum syndrome |
| Accessory navicular | Medial foot | Type II most symptomatic | Synchondrosis may be painful with overuse |
| Irregular ossification | Distal femoral epiphysis | Irregular, sclerotic appearance | Normal finding age 2-8, no treatment needed |
| Sinding-Larsen-Johansson | Inferior patella pole | Fragmentation of pole | Traction apophysitis, not avulsion |
Rule of Twos
Radiation Safety in Children
Children have 10-15x higher lifetime radiation-induced cancer risk compared to adults due to longer life expectancy and actively dividing cells. ALARA principle is paramount.
Paediatric Radiation Dose Reduction Strategies
| Strategy | Implementation | Dose Reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Size-based protocols | Reduce mAs/kVp based on weight | 50-75% |
| Reduce number of phases | Single phase CT rather than multiphasic | 60-70% |
| Limit scan coverage | Scan only area of interest | Variable |
| Shield radiosensitive organs | Gonadal/thyroid shields when possible | 90% to shielded area |
| Consider alternatives | MRI or ultrasound instead of CT | 100% (no radiation) |
A-L-A-R-AALARA Principle
Memory Hook:Document justification for any CT in children. Consider if ultrasound or MRI could answer the clinical question.
MRI Considerations in Children
Preferred Over CT
Unique Paediatric MRI Features
Common Paediatric Fracture Patterns
Unique Paediatric Fracture Types
| Fracture Type | Mechanism | Imaging Features | Management Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Torus (buckle) | Axial compression | Buckling of cortex, intact periosteum | Stable, splint 3-4 weeks |
| Greenstick | Bending force | Incomplete fracture, one cortex intact | May need completion to reduce |
| Plastic deformity | Bending force | Bowing without visible fracture line | Unique to children, may need correction |
| Toddler's fracture | Rotational force | Spiral tibial fracture, often subtle | High clinical suspicion, often occult |
| Supracondylar humerus | FOOSH | Displaced posterior fat pad, sail sign | Check for neurovascular injury |
Toddler's Fracture Key Points
Bone Age Assessment
Bone Age Assessment Methods
| Method | Technique | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greulich-Pyle | Compare left hand/wrist to atlas | Quick, widely used | Inter-observer variability |
| Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) | Score individual bones mathematically | More reproducible | Time-consuming |
| Automated (AI-based) | Computer analysis of hand X-ray | Consistent, rapid | Requires software, validation ongoing |
Advanced Bone Age Causes
Delayed Bone Age Causes
Hip Imaging in Children
DDH Imaging by Age
| Age | Modality of Choice | Key Measurements |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 4 months | Ultrasound (Graf method) | Alpha angle greater than 60° normal, Beta angle less than 55° normal |
| 4-6 months | Ultrasound or X-ray | Transition period, depends on ossific nucleus |
| Greater than 6 months | X-ray (AP pelvis) | Hilgenreiner, Perkin, Shenton lines; acetabular index |
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 4-year-old presents with elbow pain after a fall. X-ray shows a visible trochlea but you cannot identify the medial epicondyle ossification centre."
"A 2-year-old presents with refusal to weight-bear for 2 days. Initial X-rays appear normal. What is your differential diagnosis and management plan?"
"You are asked to review a CT scan of a 6-year-old with abdominal trauma. The radiologist mentions incidental bone lesions. The parent asks about radiation exposure."
Paediatric Imaging Essentials
High-Yield Exam Summary
CRITOE Elbow Ossification
- •Capitellum: 1 year
- •Radial head: 3 years
- •Internal (medial) epicondyle: 5 years
- •Trochlea: 7 years
- •Olecranon: 9 years
- •External (lateral) epicondyle: 11 years
Salter-Harris (SALTER)
- •Type I: Slip Along (physis only) - 6%
- •Type II: Above (metaphysis) - 75%, most common
- •Type III: Lower (epiphysis) - 8%, involves joint
- •Type IV: Through Everything - 10%, highest risk
- •Type V: Erasure (crush) - 1%, often missed
Radiation Safety
- •Children: 10-15x lifetime cancer risk vs adults
- •ALARA: As Low As Reasonably Achievable
- •Reduce paediatric CT dose 50-75%
- •Consider US/MRI alternatives first
- •Shield gonads/thyroid when possible
Common Traps
- •Missing entrapped medial epicondyle (CRITOE)
- •Normal X-ray doesn't exclude toddler's fracture
- •Bipartite patella is bilateral in 50%
- •Always image BOTH hips in SCFE
- •Normal variants: compare contralateral side