Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Psoriatic Arthritis - Hand

Back to Topics
Contents
0%
Hand & Upper Limb

Psoriatic Arthritis - Hand

Comprehensive examination guide to psoriatic arthritis affecting the hand and upper extremity, including diagnostic criteria, radiographic patterns, and surgical management strategies

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS - HAND

Seronegative Spondyloarthropathy | DIP Predominance | CASPAR Criteria

5-10%PsA in psoriasis patients
70%Hand involvement in PsA
91%CASPAR sensitivity
47%Erosive disease by 2 years

Five Clinical Patterns (SADDS)

Symmetric
PatternPolyarticular RA-like pattern
Treatment30-40% of cases
Asymmetric
PatternOligoarticular, most common
Treatment35% of cases
DIP predominant
PatternClassic PsA pattern
Treatment5-10% of cases
Destructive
PatternArthritis mutilans
Treatment5% of cases
Spondylitis
PatternAxial involvement
Treatment20% of cases

Critical Must-Knows

  • Dactylitis (sausage digit) pathognomonic - tenosynovitis plus joint inflammation
  • Nail changes (pitting, onycholysis) correlate with DIP arthritis severity
  • Pencil-in-cup deformity on XR is pathognomonic radiographic finding
  • Arthrodesis preferred over arthroplasty due to poor bone quality
  • Hold biologics 2-4 weeks preoperatively (coordinate with rheumatology)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Differentiate from RA: DIP involvement, asymmetry, radiographic periostitis
  • "
    CASPAR criteria: psoriasis + nail + negative RF + dactylitis + juxta-articular bone = 3 or more
  • "
    Synovectomy has limited role compared to RA due to aggressive bone erosion
  • "
    Ray resection most reliable procedure for arthritis mutilans

Exam Warning

CASPAR Criteria Required for Diagnosis: Current or personal/family history of psoriasis, nail dystrophy, negative rheumatoid factor, dactylitis, and radiographic new bone formation near joints. Score of 3 or more has 91.4% sensitivity and 98.7% specificity. Examiners expect you to know these criteria.

Essential Mnemonics

Mnemonic

SADDSFive Patterns of PsA - SADDS

S
Symmetric
Polyarticular RA-like pattern - 30-40%
A
Asymmetric
Oligoarticular, most common - 35%
D
DIP predominant
Classic PsA pattern - 5-10%
D
Destructive
Arthritis mutilans - 5%
S
Spondylitis
Axial involvement - 20%

Memory Hook:Remember SADDS for the five clinical patterns - think 'SAD Disease States'

Mnemonic

PENCILSRadiographic Features - PENCILS

P
Pencil-in-cup
Pathognomonic deformity at DIP
E
Erosions
With adjacent sclerosis
N
New bone
Periostitis and whiskering
C
Calvarium sign
Widened joint space from synovitis
I
Isolated DIP
Unlike RA which spares DIP
L
Luxation
Subluxation and dislocation
S
Soft tissue
Swelling from dactylitis

Memory Hook:PENCILS helps remember PsA radiographic findings - think of drawing the deformities

Mnemonic

RAREMutilans Reconstruction - RARE

R
Ray resection
Most reliable functional restoration
A
Arthrodesis
With bone grafting for limited indications
R
Reconstruction
Extensor mechanism repair
E
External fixation
With distraction for severe cases

Memory Hook:RARE procedures for rare but devastating arthritis mutilans

Overview

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthropathy affecting 5 to 10 percent of patients with psoriasis. Hand involvement occurs in approximately 70 percent of PsA patients and often determines functional capacity and quality of life. The disease exhibits unique patterns of joint destruction that differ fundamentally from rheumatoid arthritis, requiring distinct surgical strategies.

The hand surgeon must recognize five distinct clinical patterns, understand the impact of disease-modifying medications on surgical outcomes, and coordinate perioperative management with rheumatology. Surgical decision-making balances aggressive disease progression against modern biologic therapy efficacy.

Epidemiology

  • Prevalence: 0.3-1% general population
  • PsA in psoriasis patients: 5-10%
  • Peak onset: 30-50 years
  • Male:Female ratio 1:1
  • Hand involvement: 70%
  • Family history positive: 40%

Pathophysiology

  • HLA-B27 association (spondylitis pattern)
  • HLA-Cw6 (skin psoriasis)
  • TNF-alpha, IL-17, IL-23 pathways
  • Enthesitis primary feature
  • Osteoproliferation AND erosion
  • Synovitis less prominent than RA

Natural History

  • 47% develop erosive disease within 2 years
  • Progressive functional decline without treatment
  • Arthritis mutilans in 5% (historically 16%)
  • Biologics alter natural history
  • Nail involvement predicts DIP arthritis
  • Dactylitis predicts worse outcomes

Pathophysiology

Inflammatory Pathways

Psoriatic arthritis is driven by dysregulated immune pathways involving TNF-alpha, IL-17, and IL-23. Unlike rheumatoid arthritis where synovitis predominates, enthesitis (inflammation at tendon insertions) is the hallmark of PsA. The close anatomical relationship between the nail matrix and DIP joint explains the strong correlation between nail disease and DIP arthritis.

Key Pathophysiologic Features:

  • Enthesitis: Primary pathology at tendon insertions
  • Osteoproliferation AND erosion: Unique combination vs pure erosion in RA
  • HLA associations: HLA-B27 (spondylitis), HLA-Cw6 (skin)
  • Cytokine pathways: TNF-alpha, IL-17, IL-23 targeted by biologics

Classification

Psoriatic arthritis is a seronegative spondyloarthropathy affecting 5-10% of psoriasis patients, with hand involvement in 70%. Diagnosis uses CASPAR criteria (91.4% sensitivity, 98.7% specificity): psoriasis history, nail dystrophy, negative RF, dactylitis, and juxta-articular new bone formation. Classic radiographic finding is "pencil-in-cup" deformity at DIPs. Five clinical patterns exist: SADDS - Symmetric polyarticular (RA-like), Asymmetric oligoarticular (most common), DIP predominant, Destructive (arthritis mutilans), Spondylitis. Dactylitis (sausage digit) is pathognomonic, representing tenosynovitis plus joint inflammation. Nail changes correlate with DIP severity. Unlike RA, synovectomy has limited role due to aggressive bone erosion.

Asymmetric Oligoarticular Pattern

The most common presentation involves fewer than five joints in an asymmetric distribution. Ray pattern involvement is characteristic, where multiple joints in one digit are affected while adjacent digits remain normal. This pattern responds well to local corticosteroid injection and targeted DMARDs.

Clinical Features:

  • 1-4 joints affected
  • Ray distribution common
  • Dactylitis frequent (sausage digit)
  • Better functional prognosis
  • May progress to polyarticular pattern in 25 percent

Symmetric Polyarticular Pattern

Mimics rheumatoid arthritis but includes DIP joints. This pattern presents the greatest diagnostic challenge and accounts for 30 to 40 percent of PsA cases. Functional impairment parallels rheumatoid arthritis severity.

Distinguishing Features from RA:

  • DIP joint involvement
  • Asymmetric severity despite symmetric distribution
  • Absence of rheumatoid nodules
  • Radiographic new bone formation
  • Nail changes in 80 percent

DIP Predominant Pattern

Classic psoriatic arthritis pattern with isolated DIP involvement. Strong correlation exists between nail psoriasis and underlying DIP arthritis. This pattern often progresses slowly but can develop severe destructive changes.

Surgical Considerations:

  • Arthrodesis gold standard
  • Arthroplasty contraindicated in active disease
  • Nail bed involvement complicates wound healing
  • Mucous cyst association
  • Consider MCP or PIP involvement before isolated DIP fusion

Arthritis Mutilans

The most destructive pattern features telescoping digits from severe osteolysis. Modern biologic therapy has reduced prevalence from 16 percent to approximately 5 percent. Surgical reconstruction remains challenging.

Arthritis Mutilans Surgical Principles: Ray resection provides better function than attempted reconstruction with bone grafting. Preserve thumb and radial digits when possible. Assess extensor mechanism integrity before planning reconstruction. Consider wrist arthrodesis as foundation for hand function.

Reconstruction Options:

  • Ray resection (most reliable)
  • Arthrodesis with bone grafting
  • Tendon transfers for extension loss
  • Wrist fusion for stability
  • Consider prosthetic digits for severe cases

Clinical Presentation

CASPAR Criteria

The Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) provides standardized diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity. A score of 3 or more indicates psoriatic arthritis.

CASPAR Criteria Components

featurepointsdefinitionsensitivity
Current psoriasis2Psoriatic skin or scalp lesions present todayHigh specificity for diagnosis
History of psoriasis1Patient or first/second degree relative historyExpands diagnostic capture when skin clear
Nail dystrophy1Onycholysis, pitting, hyperkeratosisCorrelates with DIP arthritis
Negative RF1Seronegative spondyloarthropathyDistinguishes from RA
Current dactylitis1Sausage digit from tenosynovitis plus arthritisPathognomonic when present
Radiographic new bone1Juxta-articular new bone formationDistinguishes from RA erosive pattern

Investigations

Radiographic Assessment

Plain radiographs demonstrate characteristic features that distinguish PsA from rheumatoid arthritis. The combination of erosive changes AND new bone formation is pathognomonic.

Grading Radiographic Severity:

  • Grade 1: Soft tissue swelling, periarticular osteopenia
  • Grade 2: Joint space narrowing, small erosions
  • Grade 3: Multiple erosions, subluxation, periostitis
  • Grade 4: Arthritis mutilans, telescoping, ankylosis

Laboratory Studies

Unlike rheumatoid arthritis, laboratory findings in PsA are relatively nonspecific. The diagnosis relies primarily on clinical and radiographic features.

Key Laboratory Features:

  • Rheumatoid factor: Negative (positive in less than 10 percent)
  • Anti-CCP antibodies: Negative
  • HLA-B27: Positive in 20 percent (50 percent with spondylitis)
  • ESR/CRP: Elevated in 50 percent
  • Uric acid: Check to exclude gout
  • ANA: May be weakly positive

Management

Modern biologic therapy has revolutionized PsA treatment but creates perioperative management challenges. Understanding drug mechanisms and half-lives is essential for surgical planning.

Biologic Agents and Perioperative Management

agentmechanismhalfLifeperioperativeGuidance
MethotrexateFolate antagonist DMARD3-15 hoursContinue through surgery - reduces flares without increasing infection
AdalimumabTNF-alpha inhibitor10-20 daysHold 2-4 weeks before surgery, resume when wound healed
EtanerceptTNF-alpha receptor fusion3-5 daysHold 1 week before, shorter washout than adalimumab
InfliximabTNF-alpha antibody8-10 daysSchedule surgery mid-cycle, hold until wound healed
UstekinumabIL-12/23 inhibitor15-45 daysHold 4-6 weeks before major procedures
SecukinumabIL-17A inhibitor22-31 daysHold 3-4 weeks before surgery, emerging agent

Exam Pearl

Perioperative Biologic Management: The ACR recommends holding biologics for one dosing interval before elective surgery and resuming when wound healing is adequate (typically 14 days). Methotrexate can continue through surgery. Document rheumatology clearance. Increased infection risk is modest (OR 1.3-1.5) but significant in immunocompromised patients.

Surgical Indications and Principles

Indications for Surgery

Surgical intervention in PsA serves distinct purposes compared to rheumatoid arthritis. The aggressive bone destruction and less prominent synovitis alter the risk-benefit calculation.

Primary Indications:

  • Pain refractory to medical management (6 months optimized therapy)
  • Progressive deformity affecting function
  • Tendon rupture or impending rupture
  • Joint instability limiting ADLs
  • Arthritis mutilans salvage
  • Neurologic compromise (rare)

Relative Contraindications:

  • Active skin psoriasis over surgical field
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Recent biologic dose (within half-life)
  • Poor medical optimization
  • Unrealistic patient expectations

Synovectomy

Unlike rheumatoid arthritis where early synovectomy prevents erosions, PsA synovectomy has limited disease-modifying effect. Bone destruction predominates over synovial inflammation.

Synovectomy Indications in PsA:

  • Refractory painful synovitis (6 months medical therapy)
  • Accessible joints (MCP, PIP, wrist)
  • Minimal radiographic erosion
  • Failed corticosteroid injection
  • Patient unwilling to consider arthrodesis

Expected Outcomes:

  • Pain relief in 60-70 percent at 2 years
  • Disease progression continues in 50 percent
  • Inferior results compared to RA
  • Consider adjunct to other procedures

The limited efficacy reflects PsA's primary bone pathology rather than synovial inflammation. Set realistic expectations with patients.

Open Synovectomy Technique:

  1. Approach: Dorsal curved incision over affected joint
  2. Exposure: Retract extensor mechanism to expose joint
  3. Synovectomy: Excise hypertrophic synovium with rongeurs
  4. Debridement: Remove loose bodies, osteophytes
  5. Closure: Repair extensor mechanism, skin closure

Arthroscopic Considerations:

  • Small joint arthroscopy technically demanding
  • Better visualization of erosions
  • Reduced soft tissue trauma
  • Requires specialized equipment

Post-operative Protocol:

  • Splint in functional position 10-14 days
  • Early AROM exercises
  • Avoid heavy loading 6 weeks
  • Resume DMARDs when wound healed

The procedure provides temporary benefit but should be combined with optimized medical therapy to slow progression.

Synovectomy Results in PsA:

Published series show modest outcomes:

  • 60-70% good/excellent results at 2 years
  • 40-50% at 5 years (vs 70% in RA)
  • Recurrent synovitis in 30-40%
  • Progressive erosions despite synovectomy

Factors Predicting Better Outcomes:

  • Early disease (less than 2 years symptoms)
  • Minimal radiographic changes
  • Single joint involvement
  • Optimized medical therapy
  • Younger age

Complications:

  • Stiffness: 10-15%
  • Recurrent synovitis: 30-40%
  • Wound healing issues: 5-8%
  • Infection: 2-3%

This concludes the synovectomy section with outcomes data guiding patient selection and counseling.

Arthrodesis

Joint fusion represents the gold standard for end-stage PsA arthritis in the hand. The aggressive bone destruction makes arthroplasty less reliable.

Distal Interphalangeal Joint Fusion:

Most common surgical procedure in PsA hand. The correlation between nail psoriasis and DIP arthritis makes this joint particularly vulnerable.

Indications:

  • Painful DIP arthritis refractory to medical therapy
  • Progressive deformity (swan-neck developing at PIP)
  • Pencil-in-cup deformity
  • Nail bed compromise from joint destruction
  • Post-traumatic arthritis superimposed

Technique Principles:

  • Position: 5-10 degrees flexion (index), progressive flexion ulnarly
  • Bone preparation: Remove all sclerotic bone to bleeding surface
  • Fixation: K-wire, headless screw, or tension band
  • Bone grafting: Consider if significant bone loss

Implant Selection:

  • K-wire: Simple, inexpensive, requires prolonged protection
  • Headless compression screw: Higher union rate, early mobilization
  • Tension band wire: Good compression, technically demanding
  • External fixator: Salvage for severe bone loss

Expected Outcomes:

  • Union rate: 85-95% with rigid fixation
  • Pain relief: 90-95%
  • Satisfaction: 85-90%
  • Return to function: 6-8 weeks

The procedure reliably addresses pain and prevents proximal deformity progression. Nail bed involvement may require separate management.

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fusion:

Technically more demanding than DIP fusion with greater functional impact. Position is critical for hand function.

Optimal Position by Digit:

  • Index: 35-40 degrees flexion
  • Long: 40-45 degrees
  • Ring: 45-50 degrees
  • Small: 50-55 degrees

Approach Options:

  • Dorsal: Better visualization, splits central slip
  • Lateral: Preserves extensor, limited access
  • Volar: Avoids extensor mechanism, flexor plate obstacle

Fixation Methods:

  • Tension band wiring: Excellent compression
  • Plate fixation: Rigid construct, bulky
  • Intramedullary screw: Minimally invasive
  • K-wires: Requires prolonged immobilization

Technical Pearls:

  • Excise 2-3mm bone to achieve correct position
  • Create congruent surfaces perpendicular to bone axis
  • Achieve rigid compression
  • Protect until radiographic union
  • Consider adjacent joint mobility

Complications:

  • Nonunion: 5-15%
  • Malunion: 5-10%
  • Extensor lag: 10-15%
  • Stiffness adjacent joints: Variable

This fusion significantly impacts hand function but provides reliable pain relief when medical therapy fails.

Metacarpophalangeal Arthrodesis:

Less commonly performed than DIP/PIP fusion due to functional importance of MCP motion. Reserved for severe cases.

Indications:

  • Arthritis mutilans with MCP destruction
  • Salvage after failed arthroplasty
  • Thumb MCP instability
  • Post-traumatic arthritis

Thumb MCP Position:

  • 15-20 degrees flexion
  • Slight pronation for key pinch
  • Preserve IP motion if possible

Finger MCP Position:

  • Index/Long: 25-30 degrees
  • Ring/Small: 30-35 degrees

Wrist Arthrodesis in PsA:

Foundation procedure for severe disease providing stable platform for digit function.

Indications:

  • Pan-carpal arthritis
  • Arthritis mutilans foundation
  • Radiocarpal and midcarpal disease
  • Failed limited wrist fusions

Position:

  • Extension: 10-15 degrees
  • Radial deviation: 5-10 degrees
  • Neutral pronation/supination

Fixation Options:

  • Dorsal plate: Most common, reliable
  • Intramedullary rod: Minimal dissection
  • External fixator: Severe bone loss
  • Combined techniques: Complex cases

Bone Grafting:

  • Autograft: Iliac crest for structural voids
  • Allograft: Supplement autograft
  • Bone morphogenetic protein: Emerging role

These proximal fusions dramatically alter hand function and require careful patient selection and counseling.

Arthroplasty

Joint replacement in PsA carries higher failure rates than in osteoarthritis due to ongoing inflammation and bone quality issues. Patient selection is critical.

PsA Arthroplasty Contraindications: Active joint inflammation, poor bone quality, arthritis mutilans pattern, ongoing high-dose corticosteroids, and skin psoriasis over surgical field are relative/absolute contraindications. Silicone implants show high failure rates. Modern pyrocarbon implants may improve outcomes but long-term data in PsA is limited.

Arthroplasty Considerations:

  • Silicone MCP arthroplasty: 30-40% failure at 10 years in PsA (vs 15% in RA)
  • PIP arthroplasty: Very limited role, consider fusion instead
  • CMC arthroplasty: Acceptable outcomes for thumb base arthritis
  • Wrist arthroplasty: Contraindicated in PsA due to bone quality

Prerequisites for Arthroplasty:

  • Quiescent disease on stable medical therapy
  • Adequate bone stock
  • Intact soft tissue envelope
  • No active skin psoriasis
  • Realistic expectations
  • Compliance with therapy

Arthritis Mutilans Management

The most severe PsA pattern requires specialized reconstructive approach. Modern biologics have reduced prevalence but surgical salvage remains necessary.

Ray Resection

Removal of severely destroyed rays improves function by eliminating painful unstable digits and narrowing hand for better grip.

Indications:

  • Telescoping digit with bone loss exceeding 50 percent
  • Loss of extensor function
  • Painful unstable digit interfering with function
  • Patient preference after understanding alternatives

Technique:

  • Ray resection at metacarpal base
  • Preserve thumb, index, long when possible
  • Address adjacent metacarpals to narrow hand
  • Reconstruct first web space
  • Intrinsic muscle balancing

Functional Outcomes:

  • Pain relief: 85-90%
  • Improved grip: 60-70%
  • Patient satisfaction: 70-80%
  • Return to ADLs: Variable

Arthrodesis with Bone Grafting

Attempted salvage of ray with structural bone graft and rigid fixation. Technically demanding with unpredictable outcomes.

Indications:

  • Key digit (thumb, index, long)
  • Patient motivated for staged reconstruction
  • Adequate soft tissue envelope
  • Good medical control

Technique:

  • Structural iliac crest graft
  • Rigid plate or external fixation
  • Prolonged protected mobilization
  • Consider BMP augmentation

Outcomes:

  • Union rate: 60-70% (lower than standard arthrodesis)
  • Requires prolonged immobilization
  • Staged procedures common
  • Better for thumb than fingers

Tendon Problems in Psoriatic Arthritis

Enthesitis represents a hallmark PsA feature affecting tendon insertions. Flexor tenosynovitis contributes to dactylitis.

Flexor Tenosynovitis and Trigger Digits

Inflammatory tenosynovitis causes triggering and contributes to sausage digit appearance. Treatment parallels idiopathic trigger finger but with higher recurrence.

Clinical Features:

  • Diffuse tendon sheath swelling
  • Triggering at A1 pulley
  • Dactylitis when combined with joint synovitis
  • May affect multiple digits

Non-operative Management:

  • Optimize systemic therapy
  • Corticosteroid injection (60-70% success)
  • Splinting
  • Activity modification

Surgical Release:

  • Standard A1 pulley release
  • Extended tenosynovectomy if needed
  • Higher recurrence than idiopathic (20% vs 5%)
  • Resume biologics when wound healed

Extensor Tendon Rupture

Less common than in rheumatoid arthritis but occurs from dorsal erosions and synovitis. EDC ruptures most frequent.

Risk Factors:

  • Dorsal wrist synovitis
  • Carpal bone erosions
  • Lister tubercle destruction
  • Failed medical therapy

Management:

  • EIP to EPL transfer (EPL rupture)
  • Side-to-side repair (single EDC)
  • Tendon graft (chronic, retracted)
  • Address underlying bony prominences

Perioperative Management

Coordinated care with rheumatology optimizes outcomes and minimizes complications. Document comprehensive perioperative plan.

Preoperative Optimization

Medical Optimization:

  • Rheumatology clearance documented
  • Biologic holding strategy confirmed
  • Diabetes control (HbA1c less than 7.5%)
  • Nutrition assessment (albumin greater than 3.5 g/dL)
  • Smoking cessation 4 weeks minimum

Skin Assessment:

  • Active psoriasis over surgical field: Consider treatment delay
  • Chronic plaque psoriasis: Acceptable if quiescent
  • Pustular psoriasis: Defer surgery
  • Document lesions with photographs

Medication Management:

  • Hold biologics per agent half-life
  • Continue methotrexate
  • Reduce corticosteroids to less than 10 mg prednisone equivalent
  • Resume NSAIDs 24 hours post-op
  • Plan biologic resumption (typically 14 days)

Intraoperative Considerations

Anesthesia:

  • Regional anesthesia preferred (shorter PACU time)
  • Avoid general anesthesia if C-spine involvement
  • Document airway assessment

Surgical Technique:

  • Atraumatic tissue handling (friable skin)
  • Adequate debridement of devitalized bone
  • Rigid fixation for fusions
  • Meticulous hemostasis
  • Consider negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk wounds

Antibiotic Prophylaxis:

  • Standard cefazolin dosing
  • Vancomycin if MRSA risk
  • Extended prophylaxis not indicated
  • Document allergy status

Postoperative Care

Wound Management:

  • Inspect at 5-7 days (earlier if concerns)
  • Negative pressure therapy for high-risk wounds
  • Extended antibiotics NOT routine
  • Early detection of infection critical

Rehabilitation:

  • Protected mobilization per procedure
  • Hand therapy when stable
  • Gradual strengthening
  • Monitor for flare

Medical Therapy Resumption:

  • Methotrexate: Continue throughout
  • Biologics: Resume when wound sealed (typically 14 days)
  • Corticosteroids: Taper to baseline
  • NSAIDs: Resume 24 hours post-op

Complications

Functional Outcomes

Modern biologic therapy combined with appropriate surgical intervention improves long-term outcomes compared to historical cohorts.

2
📚 Gladman DD, et al. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:ii14-ii17.
Key Findings:
  • 47% of PsA patients develop erosive disease within 2 years
  • Early aggressive medical therapy reduces radiographic progression
  • Established aggressive natural history of untreated PsA

Surgical Outcome Factors:

  • Arthrodesis: 85-95% union, 90% pain relief
  • Synovectomy: 60-70% good results at 2 years
  • Arthroplasty: 70-80% survival at 10 years (inferior to OA)
  • Tendon surgery: Comparable to idiopathic if disease controlled

Complications

General Complications:

  • Infection: 2-5% (higher with biologics)
  • Wound healing problems: 5-10% (psoriatic skin)
  • Disease flare: 10-15% perioperatively
  • Stiffness: 10-20%

Procedure-Specific:

  • Fusion nonunion: 5-15%
  • Fusion malunion: 5-10%
  • Arthroplasty loosening: 20-30% at 10 years
  • Implant fracture: 5%

Long-term Disease Progression

Even with optimal medical and surgical therapy, PsA demonstrates progressive course in subset of patients.

Predictors of Progressive Disease:

  • Polyarticular onset
  • Elevated inflammatory markers
  • Early radiographic erosions
  • Arthritis mutilans pattern
  • Inadequate response to biologics

Monitoring:

  • Clinical examination every 3-6 months
  • Radiographs annually or with symptoms
  • Functional assessment (DASH, MHQ)
  • Rheumatology co-management
  • Adjust therapy based on progression

Evidence Base

1
📚 Mease PJ, et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(10):3279-3289.
Key Findings:
  • ACR20 response in 57% vs 15% placebo at 24 weeks
  • Radiographic progression halted in treatment group
  • Infection rate 1.3-fold higher than placebo

2
📚 Kavanaugh A, et al. Longterm (52-week) results of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(3):479-488.
Key Findings:
  • Sustained ACR20 response 63% at 52 weeks
  • Lower efficacy than biologics but oral administration
  • No increased infection signal in perioperative setting

3
📚 Garner SE, et al. Psoriatic arthritis: outcome of disease subsets and relationship to nail and skin disease. Br J Rheumatol. 1999;38(11):1107-1112.
Key Findings:
  • Nail involvement present in 80% of DIP arthritis patients vs 40% without
  • Correlation between nail severity and DIP erosions
  • Dactylitis predicts worse functional outcomes

2
📚 Kirwan J, et al. Effects of glucocorticoids on radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(Suppl A):A34-A38.
Key Findings:
  • Low-dose corticosteroids reduce radiographic progression
  • No significantly increased infection risk at doses less than 10mg prednisone equivalent
  • Higher doses increase infection and impair healing

3
📚 Adams J, et al. Clinical and radiological outcome of hand surgery in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(11):1453-1457.
Key Findings:
  • PIP and MCP arthrodesis achieved 87% union rate
  • 92% patient satisfaction at mean 3.7 year follow-up
  • Arthroplasty showed 35% failure rate at 5 years
  • Disease activity influenced outcomes

Underlying Mechanisms

Disease Mechanism

Definition:

  • Inflammatory arthropathy associated with psoriasis
  • Affects 30% of psoriasis patients
  • Distinct from rheumatoid arthritis in pattern and pathology

Key Features:

  • DIP joint involvement (unlike RA)
  • Dactylitis ("sausage digit")
  • Enthesitis (tendon insertions)
  • Asymmetric distribution
  • Pencil-in-cup deformity

PsA vs RA Hand Manifestations

FeaturePsoriatic ArthritisRheumatoid Arthritis
PatternAsymmetric, DIP commonSymmetric, MCP/PIP predominant
DactylitisCharacteristicRare
Nail changesCommon (80%)Uncommon
RF/Anti-CCPUsually negativeUsually positive

Molecular Pathways

Exam Viva Point

PsA Hand Pathology:

  • Enthesitis at tendon insertions (extensor apparatus)
  • Synovitis with aggressive erosive potential
  • Periostitis and new bone formation
  • DIP involvement due to close relationship with nail matrix
  • "Opera glass" hand (arthritis mutilans) in severe cases

Subtypes Affecting Hand:

  • DIP-predominant (15%)
  • Asymmetric oligoarthritis (70%)
  • Symmetric polyarthritis (15%)
  • Arthritis mutilans (rare, severe)

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Anatomic Considerations

DIP Joint:

  • Hinge joint, minimal soft tissue coverage
  • Close proximity to nail matrix (explains nail-joint connection)
  • Extensor tendon insertion

Entheses in Hand:

  • Extensor tendon insertions
  • Flexor tendon pulleys
  • Collateral ligament origins

Anatomic Targets in PsA

StructurePathologyClinical Manifestation
DIP jointErosive arthritisPencil-in-cup deformity
Nail matrixEnthesitis, inflammationPitting, onycholysis, oil drops
Flexor tendon sheathTenosynovitisDactylitis (sausage digit)
Extensor mechanismEnthesitisMallet deformity, swan-neck

Pathoanatomy

Exam Viva Point

Nail-Joint Connection:

  • DIP joint and nail matrix share common entheseal insertion
  • Extensor tendon, collateral ligaments insert near nail
  • Explains strong association between nail and DIP disease
  • Nail changes may precede joint symptoms

Dactylitis Mechanism:

  • Flexor tenosynovitis + soft tissue edema
  • Entire digit swelling ("sausage finger")
  • May be acute inflammatory or chronic

Moll and Wright Classification

PsA Classification

Moll and Wright Classification (1973):

  • Distal interphalangeal predominant (15%)
  • Asymmetric oligoarthritis (70%)
  • Symmetric polyarthritis (15%)
  • Arthritis mutilans (less than 5%)
  • Spondyloarthropathy predominant

PsA Subtypes

SubtypeJoints AffectedHand Manifestations
DIP predominantDIP joints primarilyNail changes, DIP erosions
OligoarthritisLess than 5 joints, asymmetricVariable, dactylitis common
Polyarthritis5 or more joints, symmetricRA-like, MCP/PIP involvement
Arthritis mutilansSevere erosive diseaseOpera glass hand, telescoping digits

CASPAR Criteria

Exam Viva Point

CASPAR Classification Criteria for PsA:

  • Inflammatory arthritis (joint, spine, or enthesis) PLUS 3 or more points:
    • Current psoriasis (2 points)
    • History of psoriasis (1 point)
    • Family history psoriasis (1 point)
    • Dactylitis (1 point)
    • Juxta-articular new bone formation (1 point)
    • RF negative (1 point)
    • Nail dystrophy (1 point)

Severity Classification:

  • Mild: Less than 5 joints, no erosions
  • Moderate: 5-10 joints or early erosions
  • Severe: Greater than 10 joints, erosive, or arthritis mutilans

Examination Findings

Clinical Examination

Hand Examination:

  • Joint swelling pattern (DIP involvement key)
  • Dactylitis (sausage digits)
  • Nail changes (pitting, onycholysis, oil drops)
  • Skin psoriasis (scalp, elbows, umbilicus)
  • Deformities (pencil-in-cup, swan-neck)

Systematic Assessment:

  • All hand joints (DIP, PIP, MCP, CMC)
  • Wrist involvement
  • Functional assessment (grip, pinch)

Clinical Signs in PsA Hand

SignDescriptionSignificance
DactylitisDiffuse digit swellingPathognomonic for PsA/SpA
Nail pittingSmall depressions in nail plateAssociated with DIP disease
Pencil-in-cupWhittled phalanx in expanded baseSevere erosive disease
Opera glass handTelescoping, shortened digitsArthritis mutilans

Comprehensive Assessment

Exam Viva Point

Key Examination Findings:

  1. Nail changes: Present in 80% of PsA patients
  2. DIP involvement: Distinguishes from RA
  3. Asymmetry: Unlike symmetric RA
  4. Enthesitis: Tenderness at tendon insertions
  5. Skin: Check hidden areas (scalp, umbilicus, intergluteal)

Differential Diagnosis:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (symmetric, RF positive)
  • Osteoarthritis (Heberden's nodes, no inflammation)
  • Gout (tophi, monosodium urate crystals)
  • Reactive arthritis (post-infectious)

Radiographic Investigations

Investigation Protocol

Laboratory:

  • RF and Anti-CCP (usually negative in PsA)
  • ESR and CRP (inflammatory markers)
  • HLA-B27 (associated with axial disease)
  • Uric acid (exclude gout)

Imaging:

  • Plain radiographs (erosions, new bone formation)
  • Ultrasound (synovitis, enthesitis, dactylitis)
  • MRI (early erosions, bone marrow edema)

Radiographic Features

FeatureDescriptionSignificance
Pencil-in-cupWhittled proximal phalanx in widened basePathognomonic for PsA
PeriostitisNew bone formation along shaftDistinguishes from RA
DIP erosionsMarginal erosions at DIPEarly PsA sign
AnkylosisBone fusion across jointEnd-stage disease

Advanced Imaging

Exam Viva Point

Radiographic Differentiation PsA vs RA:

  • PsA: Asymmetric, DIP, periostitis, pencil-in-cup
  • RA: Symmetric, MCP/PIP, juxta-articular osteopenia, marginal erosions
  • PsA: New bone formation (osteophytes, periostitis)
  • RA: Bone loss predominates

Ultrasound Role:

  • Power Doppler for active synovitis
  • Enthesitis detection
  • Tenosynovitis in dactylitis
  • Guide for injection/aspiration

Therapeutic Approach

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Psoriatic Arthritis Hand
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Psoriatic Arthritis HandCredit: OrthoVellum

Management Algorithm

Medical Management (Rheumatology-led):

  • NSAIDs (first-line for mild disease)
  • DMARDs (methotrexate, leflunomide)
  • Biologics (TNF inhibitors, IL-17, IL-23)
  • JAK inhibitors (newer options)

Surgical Indications:

  • Failed medical management
  • Severe deformity affecting function
  • Intractable pain
  • Tendon rupture or instability

Surgical Options

ProcedureIndicationNotes
DIP arthrodesisDIP arthritis, pencil-in-cupGold standard for DIP disease
PIP arthroplasty/arthrodesisPIP involvementArthroplasty if bone stock adequate
SynovectomyPersistent synovitisMay be combined with other procedures
Tendon reconstructionExtensor ruptureAddress underlying disease

Surgical Planning

Exam Viva Point

Perioperative Biologic Management:

  • Hold TNF inhibitors 2-4 weeks pre-op
  • Resume when wound healed (usually 2 weeks)
  • Methotrexate can usually be continued
  • Coordinate with rheumatology

Staged Approach:

  • Address most symptomatic joint first
  • DIP fusion may stabilize PIP (extensor mechanism)
  • Consider bilateral procedures if appropriate

Avoid Operating Through:

  • Active psoriatic plaques
  • Skin with Koebner phenomenon risk
  • Treat skin disease first

Surgical Technique

DIP Arthrodesis Technique

Approach:

  • Dorsal longitudinal or H-incision
  • Identify and protect germinal matrix
  • Excise articular surfaces

Fixation Options:

  • Headless compression screw (preferred)
  • K-wires (tension band technique)
  • Bioabsorbable pins

Position:

  • 15-20 degrees flexion (middle/ring)
  • 5-10 degrees (index for pinch)
  • Neutral rotation

Fixation Comparison

MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages
Headless screwRigid fixation, early motionTechnique sensitive, cost
K-wiresSimple, inexpensivePin site issues, less rigid
Tension bandGood compressionMore complex technique

Technical Pearls

Exam Viva Point

DIP Fusion Position by Digit:

  • Index: 5-10 degrees (lateral pinch)
  • Middle: 15-20 degrees (grip)
  • Ring: 15-20 degrees (grip)
  • Small: 20-25 degrees (cascade)
  • Thumb IP: 5-10 degrees (key pinch)

Bone Preparation:

  • Remove all cartilage
  • Fresh cancellous surfaces
  • Consider bone graft if significant bone loss

Special Considerations in PsA:

  • Soft, erosive bone may need augmentation
  • Avoid skin incisions over plaques
  • Anticipate soft tissue healing issues

Surgical Complications

Surgical Complications

General Complications:

  • Wound healing problems (Koebner phenomenon)
  • Infection (immunosuppression risk)
  • Nonunion (soft bone, ongoing inflammation)
  • Malposition

Disease-Specific:

  • Flare of psoriasis at surgical site
  • Delayed healing with biologics
  • Progressive joint destruction

Complication Management

ComplicationPreventionTreatment
Wound problemsAvoid plaques, coordinate biologic holdingLocal wound care, dermatology input
NonunionGood bone preparation, stable fixationRevision with bone graft
InfectionPerioperative antibiotics, biologic holdingDebridement, antibiotics

Complication Prevention

Exam Viva Point

Koebner Phenomenon:

  • Psoriasis flares at site of skin trauma
  • Can occur at surgical incisions
  • Increases wound complication risk
  • Avoid operating through active plaques
  • Optimize skin disease preoperatively

Immunosuppression Considerations:

  • TNF inhibitors increase infection risk
  • Hold biologics perioperatively
  • Resume when wound healed
  • Monitor for delayed healing

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

DIP Arthrodesis:

  • Splint for 6-8 weeks
  • K-wire removal 4-6 weeks (if used)
  • X-ray at 6 weeks for union

Medication Management:

  • Resume biologics when wound healed (2 weeks)
  • Continue DMARDs (methotrexate usually safe)
  • Coordinate with rheumatology

Rehabilitation Timeline

PhaseTimingGoals
Immobilization0-6 weeksProtect fusion, wound healing
Protected motion6-8 weeksConfirm union, gentle ROM
Strengthening8-12 weeksGrip and pinch strengthening

Special Considerations

Exam Viva Point

Biologic Resumption Protocol:

  • TNF inhibitors: Resume at 2 weeks if wound healed
  • IL-17/IL-23 inhibitors: Similar protocol
  • If wound complications: Delay until resolved
  • Close communication with rheumatology

Monitoring:

  • Wound healing (weekly initially)
  • Union (X-ray at 6 weeks)
  • Disease activity (may flare perioperatively)

Surgical Outcomes

Surgical Outcomes in PsA Hand

DIP Arthrodesis:

  • Union rate: 85-95%
  • Pain relief: 90-95%
  • Patient satisfaction: 85-90%
  • Time to union: 8-12 weeks

PIP Arthrodesis:

  • Union rate: 85-90%
  • Nonunion rate: 5-15% (higher than DIP)
  • Malposition: 5-10%

Procedure Outcomes

ProcedureSuccess RateKey Outcome Measure
DIP arthrodesis85-95% unionReliable pain relief, stable fusion
PIP arthrodesis85-90% unionHigher nonunion risk than DIP
Silicone MCP arthroplasty60-70% survival at 10 yearsInferior to RA/OA outcomes
Synovectomy60-70% at 2 yearsLess durable than in RA

Factors Affecting Outcomes

Exam Viva Point

Predictors of Poor Surgical Outcomes:

  • Active disease at time of surgery
  • Polyarticular pattern
  • Arthritis mutilans subtype
  • Elevated inflammatory markers
  • Poor bone quality
  • Inadequate biologic holding period

Long-term Considerations:

  • Disease progression continues despite surgery
  • Adjacent joint involvement common
  • May require staged procedures
  • Biologic era improved overall outcomes

Key Studies Summary

Key Studies

Diagnostic Criteria:

  • Taylor W et al. (2006): CASPAR criteria validation - sensitivity 91.4%, specificity 98.7%

Medical Management:

  • ADEPT trial (2005): Adalimumab efficacy in PsA
  • IMPACT trials: Infliximab disease modification

Surgical Outcomes:

  • Adams J et al. (2007): Hand surgery outcomes - 87% fusion union, 35% arthroplasty failure at 5 years

Evidence Summary

StudyFindingClinical Relevance
CASPAR criteria91% sensitivity, 99% specificityGold standard diagnosis
Gladman 200547% erosive disease at 2 yearsEarly aggressive treatment needed
Adams 2007Arthrodesis superior to arthroplastyFusion preferred in PsA

Critical Appraisal

Exam Viva Point

Evidence Hierarchy for PsA Hand Surgery:

  • Level I: Biologic efficacy (RCTs) - ADEPT, PALACE
  • Level II: Cohort studies on surgical outcomes
  • Level III: Case series for rare procedures (mutilans)
  • Note: No RCTs compare surgical techniques in PsA hand

Evidence Gaps:

  • No head-to-head surgical technique comparisons
  • Limited long-term arthroplasty data in PsA
  • Optimal biologic holding duration not established

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

EXAMINER

"A 42-year-old female with known psoriatic arthritis presents with progressive deformity of her right middle finger. She has tried methotrexate and adalimumab with partial response. Examination shows a 'pencil-in-cup' deformity at the DIP joint with fixed flexion at the PIP creating a swan-neck posture. Radiographs demonstrate severe DIP erosions and early PIP changes. Her skin psoriasis is well-controlled. Discuss your management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has characteristic pencil-in-cup DIP deformity with secondary swan-neck developing at PIP. Management requires staged approach addressing DIP arthritis first to prevent PIP progression. I would optimize medical therapy with rheumatology, then proceed with DIP arthrodesis in functional flexion (15-20 degrees for middle finger). This prevents further PIP hyperextension. If PIP synovitis persists after DIP fusion, consider PIP synovectomy or eventual fusion if joint destruction progresses. Coordinate perioperative biologic holding with rheumatology - typically hold adalimumab 2-4 weeks pre-operatively and resume when wound healed at approximately 14 days.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Pencil-in-cup deformity is pathognomonic radiographic finding in PsA
DIP arthritis drives secondary swan-neck deformity via extensor imbalance
DIP arthrodesis in functional flexion is gold standard treatment
Staged approach: address DIP first, observe PIP response
Coordinate perioperative biologic management with rheumatology
TNF-inhibitors held 2-4 weeks pre-op, resumed when wound healed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Don't fuse DIP in extension - will worsen swan-neck tendency
✗Don't attempt DIP arthroplasty - high failure rate in PsA
✗Don't operate through active psoriatic skin lesions
✗Don't continue biologics through surgery - increased infection risk
✗Don't fuse PIP simultaneously unless severe disease - may not need if DIP stabilized
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you position the DIP fusion? (15-20 degrees flexion for middle/ring)"
"What fixation would you use? (Headless compression screw or tension band)"
"What if she had active skin psoriasis over the surgical site? (Defer surgery, treat skin)"
"What if both DIP and PIP joints required fusion? (Stage procedures, DIP first)"
"How long would you hold adalimumab? (2-4 weeks pre-op, half-life 10-20 days)"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

EXAMINER

"You are asked to see a 38-year-old man in rheumatology clinic with newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis. He has painful swelling of his right index finger with involvement of the MCP, PIP, and DIP joints - a 'sausage digit'. Radiographs show early erosive changes at the DIP with soft tissue swelling. He is starting methotrexate. The rheumatologist asks your opinion on surgical management. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient demonstrates classic dactylitis or 'sausage digit' from combined flexor tenosynovitis and multiple joint synovitis. With early disease and just starting medical therapy, surgery is not indicated at this stage. I would recommend optimizing medical management first - methotrexate with possible progression to TNF-inhibitor if inadequate response. Most patients respond well to modern biologics. If symptoms persist despite 6 months of optimized medical therapy, surgical options include corticosteroid injection for triggering if present, flexor tenosynovectomy if significant tenosynovitis, or joint-specific procedures based on predominant pathology. Given early erosive changes at DIP, I would monitor radiographically every 6-12 months as DIP arthrodesis may eventually be required if progressive despite medical therapy.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Dactylitis pathognomonic for PsA - tenosynovitis plus joint inflammation
Early disease requires medical optimization, not surgery
Modern biologics highly effective - allow 6 months optimized therapy
Monitor radiographically for progression every 6-12 months
Surgery reserved for: failed medical therapy, progressive deformity, functional impairment
DIP joint most vulnerable - early erosions predict need for eventual fusion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Don't recommend immediate surgery for early inflammatory disease
✗Don't underestimate biologic efficacy - many patients avoid surgery
✗Don't perform synovectomy as disease-modifying procedure in PsA (unlike RA)
✗Don't miss opportunity for DMARD/biologic escalation
✗Don't operate without rheumatology coordination and medical optimization
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is dactylitis? (Sausage digit from tenosynovitis plus joint inflammation)"
"How does this differ from RA? (Ray pattern, DIP involvement, asymmetry)"
"What medical therapies would you expect? (Methotrexate, then TNF-inhibitors)"
"When would synovectomy be indicated? (Refractory synovitis, minimal erosions, not disease-modifying)"
"What is the natural history without treatment? (47% erosive disease by 2 years)"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the pathognomonic radiographic finding in psoriatic arthritis of the hand?

A: Pencil-in-cup deformity - caused by bone resorption creating a pointed proximal phalanx articulating with an expanded cup-shaped base. Results from aggressive osteolysis at articular margins. Most commonly seen in DIP joints. Associated with arthritis mutilans in severe cases.

Exam Pearl

Q: Which joint distribution pattern distinguishes psoriatic arthritis from rheumatoid arthritis in the hand?

A: Psoriatic arthritis preferentially affects DIP joints and shows a ray pattern (entire digit involved). Contrast with RA which affects MCP and PIP joints symmetrically and spares DIPs. Dactylitis (sausage digit) is characteristic of PsA due to flexor tenosynovitis combined with joint inflammation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What clinical feature is most specific for psoriatic arthritis versus other inflammatory arthropathies?

A: Nail changes occur in 80-90% of patients with hand PsA and include: pitting, onycholysis, oil drop discoloration, and subungual hyperkeratosis. Nail involvement correlates with DIP disease. Enthesitis (inflammation at tendon insertions) is another distinguishing feature.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the key radiographic features that distinguish psoriatic arthritis from rheumatoid arthritis?

A: PsA features: proliferative new bone formation (periostitis), asymmetric distribution, DIP involvement, ankylosis, and pencil-in-cup deformity. RA features: periarticular osteopenia, symmetric erosions, MCP/PIP involvement, and ulnar deviation. Both show erosions but PsA has bone formation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the recommended first-line DMARD for psoriatic arthritis with hand involvement?

A: Methotrexate remains first-line DMARD for peripheral PsA, effective for both joint and skin disease. TNF inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept) indicated for inadequate response or severe disease. IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab) and IL-23 inhibitors increasingly used. Apremilast (PDE4 inhibitor) is an oral alternative.

Australian Context

Australian Healthcare Considerations

PBS Access:

  • Biologics (adalimumab, etanercept) PBS-listed for PsA

  • Authority required: Failed conventional DMARD (methotrexate)

  • Continuing criteria: Disease activity assessment

  • 46363: DIP arthrodesis

  • 46357: Synovectomy finger joint

  • 46351: Arthroplasty small joint hand

Australian Practice Points

AspectDetailAccess
BiologicsPBS Authority requiredAfter DMARD failure
SurgeryPublic/private optionsMBS rebate available
RheumatologyShared care modelCoordinate perioperative biologics

Specialist Coordination

Exam Viva Point

Multidisciplinary Care in Australia:

  • Rheumatology: Biologic prescribing, disease monitoring
  • Hand surgery: Operative management when indicated
  • Dermatology: Skin disease optimization preoperatively
  • Hand therapy: Postoperative rehabilitation
  • GP: Ongoing care coordination

Private Practice:

  • Gap payments for complex procedures
  • Consider PHI status for biologics access
  • Theatre availability for hand surgery

High-Yield Exam Summary

CASPAR Criteria (Score ≥3)

  • •Current psoriasis (2 pts) or history/family (1 pt)
  • •Nail dystrophy - pitting, onycholysis (1 pt)
  • •Negative rheumatoid factor (1 pt)
  • •Current/past dactylitis (1 pt)
  • •Radiographic new bone formation (1 pt)
  • •Sensitivity 91.4%, Specificity 98.7%

Five Clinical Patterns - SADDS

  • •Symmetric polyarticular (30-40%) - RA-like
  • •Asymmetric oligoarticular (35%) - most common
  • •DIP predominant (5-10%) - classic pattern
  • •Destructive/mutilans (5%) - telescoping
  • •Spondylitis (20%) - axial involvement

Radiographic Features - PENCILS

  • •Pencil-in-cup (pathognomonic)
  • •Erosions with sclerosis
  • •New bone formation (periostitis)
  • •Calvarium sign (widened joint)
  • •Isolated DIP involvement
  • •Luxation/subluxation
  • •Soft tissue swelling

Surgical Principles

  • •Arthrodesis preferred over arthroplasty
  • •DIP fusion: 15-20° flexion (middle/ring)
  • •Synovectomy limited role vs RA
  • •Ray resection for mutilans most reliable
  • •Coordinate with rheumatology for biologics
  • •Hold TNF-inhibitors 2-4 weeks pre-op

Biologic Management

  • •Methotrexate: Continue through surgery
  • •Adalimumab: Hold 2-4 weeks (t½ 10-20d)
  • •Etanercept: Hold 1 week (t½ 3-5d)
  • •Infliximab: Hold 2-3 weeks (t½ 8-10d)
  • •Resume when wound healed (~14 days)
  • •Document rheumatology clearance

Distinguish from RA

  • •DIP involvement (RA spares)
  • •Asymmetric distribution
  • •Radiographic new bone (RA only erosions)
  • •Seronegative (RF negative)
  • •Nail dystrophy
  • •Dactylitis pathognomonic

Indications for Surgery

  • •Pain despite 6mo optimized medical Rx
  • •Progressive deformity affecting ADLs
  • •Joint instability
  • •Tendon rupture
  • •Arthritis mutilans salvage
  • •Contraindications: active psoriasis over field

Arthritis Mutilans - RARE

  • •Ray resection (most reliable)
  • •Arthrodesis with bone grafting
  • •Reconstruction extensor mechanism
  • •External fixation with distraction
  • •Prevalence reduced 16% to 5% with biologics
  • •Wrist fusion provides stable platform

Summary

Psoriatic arthritis of the hand presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The disease exhibits five distinct clinical patterns with DIP predominance distinguishing it from rheumatoid arthritis. Diagnosis relies on CASPAR criteria with pathognomonic pencil-in-cup radiographic deformity.

Modern biologic therapy has revolutionized disease management, reducing arthritis mutilans prevalence and delaying surgical intervention. When surgery is required, arthrodesis provides more reliable outcomes than arthroplasty due to aggressive bone destruction. Coordination with rheumatology for perioperative biologic management is essential.

The hand surgeon must recognize the limited role of synovectomy compared to RA, understand appropriate fusion positioning, and master salvage techniques including ray resection for arthritis mutilans. Patient selection, realistic expectations, and optimization of medical therapy determine outcomes in this challenging condition.

Quick Stats
Reading Time130 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand