Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Rotator Cuff Arthropathy

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Rotator Cuff Arthropathy

Comprehensive guide to Cuff Tear Arthropathy, covering pathophysiology (Acetabularization), Seebauer classification, and Reverse TSA management.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-23
High Yield Overview

ROTATOR CUFF ARTHROPATHY

Massive Cuff Tear | Superior Migration | Acetabularization

4%Prevalence (70y+)
ReverseGold Standard
FemalesPredominance
PseudoParalysis Risk

Seebauer Classification

Type 1A
PatternCentered Head, Stable
TreatmentHemi/Reverse
Type 1B
PatternCentered Head, Medialized
TreatmentHemi/Reverse
Type 2A
PatternSuperior Subluxed, Stable
TreatmentReverse TSA
Type 2B
PatternAnterior-Superior Escape, Unstable
TreatmentReverse TSA

Critical Must-Knows

  • Pathophysiology: Loss of 'The Spacer' (Supraspinatus) and 'The Fulcrum' (Force Couples).
  • Acetabularization of the acromion is the hallmark radiographic sign.
  • Pseudoparalysis (less than 90 deg active elevation with full passive) is a key indication for Reverse TSA.
  • Hemiarthroplasty is largely historical/salvage (CTA Head).
  • Reverse TSA requires a functioning Deltoid and Axillary Nerve.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Look for the 'Popeye' deformity (Biceps rupture is common precursor).
  • "
    Anterior-Superior Escape: Head palpable subcutaneously.
  • "
    Hornblower's Sign (Teres Minor) predicts External Rotation outcome.
  • "
    Fluid sign (Geyser sign) on AC joint.
  • "
    Subscapularis failure leads to Anterior Escape.
  • "
    Teres Minor failure leads to External Rotation deficit.

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Annotated AP shoulder X-ray demonstrating glenohumeral position with superior humeral migration characteristic of rotator cuff tear and arthropathy.
Click to expand
Annotated AP shoulder X-ray demonstrating glenohumeral position with superior humeral migration characteristic of rotator cuff tear and arthropathy.Credit: Mikael Häggström via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 Public Domain) via Wikimedia Commons (CC0)
Right shoulder AP X-ray in internal rotation showing superior migration with reduced acromiohumeral distance.
Click to expand
Right shoulder AP X-ray in internal rotation showing superior migration with reduced acromiohumeral distance.Credit: Micaela E. via Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain) via Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)
AP X-ray one year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty showing glenosphere and humeral cup components.
Click to expand
AP X-ray one year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty showing glenosphere and humeral cup components.Credit: Mattiassich et al. via Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-2.0) via Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-2.0)

Critical definition: Pseudoparalysis vs Pseudo-pseudoparalysis

At a Glance

Differential Diagnosis of the High-Riding Head

ConditionHistoryKey FeatureManagement
Cuff Tear ArthropathyChronic pain, weaknessArthritis + Cuff TearReverse TSA
Massive Cuff Tear (No OA)Pain, preserved motionNormal Joint SpaceRepair / SCR / Balloon
Acute Cuff TearTraumaNo acromial wearUrgent Repair
Rheumatoid ArthritisSystemic diseaseCentral erosionMedical Mx / Arthroplasty

Mnemonics

Mnemonic

FATCTA Pathophysiology

F
Fulcrum Loss
Loss of concavity compression
A
Acetabularization
Acromion becomes a socket
T
Translation
Superior migration of the head

Memory Hook:FAT shoulder: Fulcrum loss, Acetabularization, Translation.

Mnemonic

BADRequirements for Reverse TSA

B
Bone Stock
Glenoid must support baseplate
A
Axillary Nerve
Deltoid must be functioning
D
Deltoid
Muscle quality must be adequate

Memory Hook:Don't use a Reverse if the scenario is BAD (No Bone, No Nerve, No Deltoid).

Mnemonic

ASHContraindications to Hemi

A
Anterior Escape
Coracoacromial arch incompetence
S
Stability
Lack of static constraints
H
High Demand
Patient needs active elevation

Memory Hook:Hemi turns to ASH in unstable shoulders.

Mnemonic

TILTScapular Notching Prevention

T
Tilt inferiorly
Inferior baseplate tilt reduces impingement
I
Inferior placement
Place glenosphere flush or below inferior rim
L
Lateralize
Lateralized glenosphere or BIO-RSA
T
135 neck-shaft angle
Modern 135 degree stems reduce notching vs 155 degree

Memory Hook:TILT the baseplate to prevent notching!

Overview and Epidemiology

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Relevant Anatomy

  • Coracoacromial Arch: Becomes the new weight-bearing roof of the shoulder. Do NOT violate the CA ligament in CTA surgery (it is the only restraint against escape).
  • Glenoid: Can become eroded superiorly ("E2 type wear").
  • Subscapularis: Often intact in early stages but if torn, leads to anterior escape.
  • Teres Minor: Critical for external rotation. If absent or fatty infiltrated (Hornblower's), a standard Reverse TSA will still result in an arm that cannot externally rotate (Latissimus Dorsi transfer may be added).
  • Neurovascular Relations:
    • Axillary Nerve: Runs 5cm distal to the acromion. Travels through the quadrangular space with the posterior circumflex humeral artery.
    • Suprascapular Nerve: Travels through the suprascapular notch (under the transverse ligament) and spinoglenoid notch. Risk of injury during posterior glenoid retraction.
    • Cephalic Vein: The primary landmark for the deltopectoral approach. Preserving it reduces venous congestion.

Classification Systems

Seebauer Classification

Functional classification based on the center of rotation and stability. Guides treatment.

TypeFeaturesStabilityTreatment
Type 1AHead Centered, Minimal migrationStableHemi / Reverse
Type 1BHead Centered, Medialized glenoidStableHemi / Reverse
Type 2AHead Migrated SuperiorlyStable (under arch)Reverse TSA
Type 2BAnterior-Superior EscapeUnstableReverse TSA

Hamada Classification

Radiographic progression of massive cuff tears to CTA.

  • Grade 1: Acromiohumeral Interval (AHI) greater than 6mm.
  • Grade 2: AHI ≤ 5mm.
  • Grade 3: Acetabularization of acromion.
  • Grade 4: Glenohumeral Arthritis (Narrowing).
  • Grade 5: Humeral Head Collapse (AVN-like).

Note: Hamada 3, 4, 5 are the classic "Cuff Tear Arthropathy" stages.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain: Night pain is prominent.
  • Weakness: Inability to lift arm ("Pseudoparalysis").
  • Duration: Often long history of shoulder trouble.

Examination

  • Look: Supraspinatus/Infraspinatus wasting. "Popeye" muscle (biceps rupture).
  • Move: Pseudoparalysis (Forward flexion less than 90). Anterolaterally escaped head (palpable bulge).
  • Lag Signs: ER Lag sign (Infraspinatus), Hornblower's sign (Teres Minor), Lift-off lag (Subscap).

Neurological Exam

Always document Axillary Nerve function (deltoid contraction). A Reverse TSA relies entirely on the deltoid. If the deltoid is paralyzed, a Reverse TSA is contraindicated (Disaster).

Investigations

Diagnostic Workup

X-RayAP and Axillary
  • AHI: Acromiohumeral interval less than 7mm suggests massive tear. Less than 5mm is diagnostic of extensive tear.
  • Femoralization: Rounding of greater tuberosity.
  • Acetabularization: Concavity of acromion undersurface.

The radiographic changes progress systematically from early superior migration to late acetabularization.

  • Joint Space: Loss of GH space (superiorly first).
CT ScanArthroplasty Planning
  • Bone Stock: Assess glenoid for existing screws/anchors from prior surgeries.
  • Erosion: Look for superior glenoid wear (Favard E-type).
MRIMuscle Quality and Fatty Infiltration

MRI is the gold standard for assessing the "engine" of the shoulder - the muscles.

  • Goutallier Classification: Defines fatty infiltration.
    • Grade 0: No fat.
    • Grade 1: Some fat streaks.
    • Grade 2: More muscle than fat (less than 50%).
    • Grade 3: Equal muscle and fat (50%).
    • Grade 4: More fat than muscle (greater than 50%).
  • Significance: Grade 3 and 4 changes are irreversible. Repairing a cuff with Grade 3/4 fat has a 90-100% failure rate.
  • Teres Minor Integrity: This is the most critical structure to evaluate for a Reverse TSA. Look for it on the axial cuts. If Teres Minor is Grade 3/4, the patient will NOT have external rotation post-op. This is a specific indication for a Latissimus Dorsi Transfer.

Imaging Gallery

AP shoulder X-ray showing superior humeral migration in rotator cuff arthropathy
Click to expand
Annotated AP shoulder X-ray demonstrating superior humeral migration. Green overlay shows the glenoid fossa and humeral head center; blue lines indicate altered glenohumeral relationship. Superior escape of the humeral head is the hallmark radiographic finding of massive cuff tear progressing to arthropathy.Credit: Mikael Häggström via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 Public Domain)
Right shoulder X-ray showing reduced acromiohumeral distance
Click to expand
Right shoulder AP X-ray (internal rotation) demonstrating reduced acromiohumeral distance with superior humeral migration. The humeral head abuts the undersurface of the acromion - this eventually leads to acetabularization (concavity) of the acromion in chronic cases.Credit: Micaela E. via Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)
AP X-ray of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Click to expand
AP X-ray showing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) at one year follow-up. The glenosphere (ball) is fixed to the scapula with screws while the humeral component has a cup-shaped articulation - this 'reverse' design medializes the center of rotation and allows the deltoid to substitute for absent rotator cuff function.Credit: Mattiassich et al. via Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-2.0)

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management Algorithm CTA
Click to expand
Algorithm based on patient age, function (pseudoparalysis), and stability (Seebauer).Credit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management

  • Indications: Elderly, low demand, stable joint (Seebauer 1).
  • Physiotherapy: Deltoid re-education protocol. Anterior Deltoid strengthening. Avoid rotator cuff strengthening (it's gone).
  • Injections: Corticosteroid for pain relief (temporary).
  • Outcomes: Many patients (Type 1A/B) abide well with low demand adaptation.

Pearl: Always try a period of non-operative management first unless there is an anterior escape (Seebauer 2B) which is functionally debilitating.

Surgical Options

ProcedureIndicationProsCons
Arthroscopic DebridementPainful mild CTA, Good motionLow morbidityUnpredictable
Hemi-arthroplastySeebauer 1A (Historical)Preserves boneUnreliable pain relief
Reverse TSAPseudoparalysis, Seebauer 2, Failure of Non-opRestores elevationComplication risk

Reverse TSA Principles

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (rTSA) The workhorse for CTA.

Biomechanics of Grammont Style Reverse

  1. Medialization: Moves center of rotation medially. Increases the lever arm of the deltoid (recruits more fibers).
  2. Distalization: Moves center of rotation distally. Retensions the deltoid.
  3. Constraint: Semi-constrained design provides stability (replaces the cuff's function).

Indications

  • CTA with pseudoparalysis.
  • Massive unrepairable cuff tear.
  • Failed Hemiarthroplasty/Total Arthroplasty.
  • Proximal Humerus Malunion/Nonunion.

Contraindications

  • Deltoid Paralysis (Axillary nerve injury).
  • Active Infection.
  • Glenoid Bone Deficiency (unable to hold baseplate screws).

Surgical Technique

Deltopectoral Approach

  • Standard approach.
  • Pearl: The Coracoacromial (CA) ligament is often preserved in CTA if doing a Hemi, but in Reverse, it is usually released.
  • Subscapularis: Often contracted or torn. Released/Debrided.

Preserve the deltoid insertion distally. Protect the cephalic vein.

Glenoid Prep (Baseplate)

The "Win" in Reverse TSA is determined by the glenoid position.

  • Exposure: Required 360 degree visualization of the glenoid. Release the inferior capsule (triceps origin) completely.
  • Position: "Low and Inferior". Ideally, the baseplate should be flush with the inferior glenoid rim (or even 1-2mm overhanging).
    • Reason: This minimizes scapular notching by maximizing the distance between the humerus and the scapular neck.
  • Tilt: Most modern systems advocate for neutral version or slight inferior tilt.
    • Reason: Inferior tilt converts shear forces (which loosen the implant) into compression forces (which seat the implant) during elevation.
  • Reaming:
    • The goal is to correct glenoid version to neutral or slight inferior tilt.
    • E2 Wear: Superior erosion is common. This requires eccentric reaming to lower the high side (inferiorly) to match the worn superior side, or use of an Augmented Baseplate (wedge).
    • Danger: Excessive reaming removes the subchondral bone plate, compromising fixation.
  • Fixation:
    • Central Post vs Screw: Modern systems often use a central screw for compression. The central post requires good quality bone.
    • Peripheral Screws: Locking screws are essential.
      • Superior Screw: Aim towards the base of the coracoid (Best bone).
      • Inferior Screw: Aim towards the scapular pillar.
      • Posterior Screw: Aim into the scapular spine.
  • Glenosphere Selection:
    • Size: 36mm is standard. Larger (40/42mm) increases stability (jump distance) and range of motion but may overtension.
    • Offset: Lateralized glenospheres decrease notching but increase stress on the baseplate interface (moments).

Pearl: Most surgeons currently favor some form of lateralization (glenoid or humerus) to minimize notching.

Humeral Preparation

  • Version: Cut in 0 to 20 degrees retroversion.
    • Trade-off: More retroversion allows more external rotation in adduction (hand to stomach) but places the posterior cuff on tension and reduces stability. Less retroversion (0 deg) improves stability but limits ER. Most surgeons aim for ~10-20 deg.
  • Height: Determine the height of the cut relative to the calcar. Calcar planing is crucial to ensure the stem sits flush and does not subside.
  • Stem Fixation:
    • Cemented: Historically the gold standard, especially in osteopenic "stove-pipe" humeri.
    • Uncemented: Modern hydroxyapatite (HA) coated stems have excellent results and are now standard in Australia for Reverse TSA (unlike anatomic).
  • Trialing: The most interactive part of the surgery.
    • Reduction: Should require some force to reduce.
    • Combined Anteroposterior Translation: Should be stability against dislocation.
    • Length: The arm should not be excessively lengthened (check nerve tension, deltoid tightness).
    • Conjoint Tendon: The "Conjoint Tendon Tension" test implies the tendon should feel firm (like a guitar string) but not rock hard when the arm is reduced.
  • Subscapularis: To repair or not to repair?
    • Controversial: Some argue repair improves stability. Others argue it limits rotation and is prone to painful failure. Current consensus: Repair if good quality, ignore if poor.

Key Check: Confirm "No Tension" on the conjoint tendon. It should be palpable but not taut.

Complications

ComplicationRiskMechanismPrevention
Scapular NotchingCommonMedial humeral cup hits scapula neckLateralized glenosphere / Inverse graft
Acromial Fracture1-3%Overtensioning / Delt stress / OsteopeniaAvoid lengthening arm too much
Dislocation3%Undertensioning / ImpingementProper tensioning, larger glenosphere
NeuroapraxiaCommonArm lengthening tractionIntra-op monitoring

Scapular Notching (Sirveaux Classification) Notching is a unique complication of Reverse TSA where the humeral cup abrades the inferior scapular neck during adduction.

  • Grade 1: Defect involving pillar only.
  • Grade 2: Defect contacting lower screw.
  • Grade 3: Defect extending over lower screw.
  • Grade 4: Defect extending to central peg (Threatening fixation).
  • Prevention:
    • Lateralization: This is the most effective method.
      • Glenoid Side: Bony-metallic (BIO-RSA) or Metallic lateralization.
      • Humeral Side: Onlay stems or curved stems.
    • Inferior Overhang: Placing the glenosphere inferiorly prevents impingement in adduction.
    • Neck-Shaft Angle:
      • 155 degrees (Grammont original): High rate of notching.
      • 135 degrees (Modern): Reduces notching but increases shear force on the baseplate.

Acromial Stress Fracture

  • Pathology: The deltoid is significantly tensioned. In elderly osteopenic patients, this stress can fracture the acromion or scapular spine.
  • Diagnosis: Sudden onset pain after doing well for 3 months. X-ray might miss it (requires scapular views/CT).
  • Consequence: Catastrophic. The deltoid origin becomes unstable. The "Reverse" stops working.
  • Treatment: Conservative (High rate of non-union). ORIF has high failure rate.

Infection (Periprosthetic Joint Infection - PJI)

  • Pathogen: Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is the causative organism in over 60% of shoulder PJIs.
    • Biology: Gram-positive, anaerobic, slow-growing bacillus. Commensal on skin, specifically in sebaceous glands (which are dense in the shoulder region).
  • Risk Factors: Male gender (more hair/sebum), younger age, prior surgery, topical steroids.
  • Presentation: rarely presents with acute sepsis (fever/redness). Typical presentation is aggressive "stiffness" or unexplained "pain" after a period of doing well.
  • Diagnosis:
    • Markers: ESR/CRP are often normal in C. acnes infection.
    • Aspiration: Dry taps are common.
    • Cultures: Must be held for minimum 14 days (up to 21 days).
    • Frozen Section: Over 50 PMNs per HPF is suggestive.
  • Management:
    • DAIR (Debridement): Poor success rate for C. acnes. Only considered for acute hematogenous spread.
    • Two-Stage Revision: The Gold Standard.
      • Stage 1: Removal of all implants, thorough debridement, placement of antibiotic spacer (high dose Vancomycin/Gentamicin).
      • Antibiotics: 6 weeks of targeted therapy (often includes Rifampin for biofilm).
      • Stage 2: Reimplantation after antibiotic holiday and negative rescreen.

Neurological Injury

  • Axillary Nerve: Most at risk during the inferior capsular release or from traction.
  • Presentation: Deltid paralysis.
  • Prognosis: Most are neurapraxias that resolve.
  • Prevention: Identify the nerve. Keep the arm adducted while releasing inferiorly.

Postoperative Care

Rehab Protocol

0-4 WeeksImmobilization and Protection
  • Sling: Worn for comfort and protection, usually for 4 weeks.
  • Range of Motion:
    • Passive Supine Elevation to 90 degrees allowed immediately.
    • Passive External Rotation to neutral (0 degrees).
  • Restrictions:
    • No Extension: Extension coupled with adduction and internal rotation (reaching for back pocket) is the position of dislocation.
    • No Active Elevation: Protect the deltoid and subscapularis repair (if done).
  • Functional: Hand to mouth activities (eating, drinking) are encouraged to prevent stiffness.
4-8 WeeksActivation and Deltoid Recruitment
  • Wean Sling: Discontinue sling use during the day.
  • Active Assisted Motion: Pulleys and stick exercises.
  • Deltoid Recruitment:
    • Begin supine active forward elevation (gravity eliminated).
    • Progress to standing active forward elevation as deltoid control improves.
  • Hydrotherapy: Excellent for deltoid activation without gravity.
3 Months+Strengthening and Conditioning
  • Deltoid Strengthening: Progressive resistance bands (Therabands).
  • Scapular Stabilizers: Rhomboids and Trapezius strengthening.
  • Functional Use: Return to full activities of daily living.
  • Sports: Golf and swimming (breaststroke) are often tolerated. Overhead sports (tennis service) are generally discouraged.
Long TermRestrictions and Expectation
  • Weight Limit: Generally restrict lifting to under 5-10kg repetitive overhead.
  • Function: Expect active elevation to ~140 degrees. Rapid fatigue with overhead activity is common due to deltoid fatigue.
  • Proprioception: The joint position sense is altered (no cuff).

Outcomes and Prognosis

  • Elevation: Restore active elevation reliably (over 130 degrees).
  • Rotation: External rotation is often not restored (0-10 degrees) unless Teres Minor is intact or Lat Dorsi transfer is done.
  • Function: Patients can feed themselves and reach top of head, but reaching up back (IR) is limited.

Evidence Base

Grammont Principles

Grammont et al • Clin Orthop (1987)
Key Findings:
  • Medializing the center of rotation increases deltoid lever arm.
  • Distalizing the humerus tensions the deltoid.
  • Provided solution for stable fulcrum in cuff deficient shoulder.
Clinical Implication: Foundation of modern Reverse TSA.

Reverse TSA for CTA

Wall et al • JBJS (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Excellent pain relief and restoration of elevation.
  • Function improved significantly.
  • External rotation remained limited.
Clinical Implication: Reliable for elevation/pain, unpredictable for rotation.

BIO-RSA (Bony Lateralization)

Boileau et al • JSES (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Using humeral head autograft behind baseplate.
  • Reduces scapular notching.
  • Improves rotational range by lateralizing.
Clinical Implication: Lateralization helps reduce notching and improve rotation.

Hemi vs Reverse for CTA

Young et al • JBJS (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Reverse superior to Hemiarthroplasty for function.
  • Hemi failed to restore elevation in pseudoparalytic shoulders.
  • Revision rate higher in Hemi group.
Clinical Implication: Reverse is superior to Hemi for CTA.

Acromial Fractures

Crosby et al • JSES (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Occur in osteopenic patients.
  • Overtensioning (distalization) is a risk factor.
  • Clinical result significantly worse if fracture occurs.
Clinical Implication: Caution in tensioning osteopenic patients.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Failed Hemi

EXAMINER

"A 75F had a Hemiarthroplasty for a fracture 2 years ago. Now has pain and cannot lift arm above 40 degrees. X-ray shows superior escape of the prosthesis."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a classic failure of Hemiarthroplasty due to tuberosity failure/resorption, evolving into an iatrogenic Cuff Tear Arthropathy. 1. **Workup**: Infection screen (ESR/CRP/Aspiration) is mandatory before revision. CT scan to assess glenoid bone stock (often surprisingly good as hemi head is smooth). 2. **Pathology**: The 'Force Couples' are gone. The Hemi head acts as a wedge, driving superiorly. 3. **Management**: - If Infection negative: Revision to Reverse TSA. - **Challenge**: Extraction of the stem. If well fixed, may need a 'cement-in-cement' revision or humerus osteotomy. - **Outcome**: Pain relief is good, function is better than pre-op but worse than primary Reverse.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Rule out infection first
Mechanism is loss of cuff/tuberosities
Reverse is the salvage solution
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missed low grade infection
✗Underestimating difficulty of stem removal
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you remove a well-fixed cement stem?"
"What if the deltoid is damaged?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

No External Rotation

EXAMINER

"You perform a Reverse TSA on a 70M. Post-op, he has 140 elevation but cannot externally rotate (ER is -10). He is unhappy (cannot eat with fork, comb hair). Why?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is due to the absence of the posterior rotator cuff (Infraspinatus and Teres Minor). 1. **Biomechanics**: A standard Grammont Reverse restores elevation (Deltoid) but does NOT restore rotation. It actually medializes the cuff insertion, weakening any remaining rotational torque. 2. **Prediction**: Pre-op Hornblower's sign or fatty infiltration of Teres Minor on MRI (Goutallier 3/4) predicts this. 3. **Prevention/Treatment**: - **Latissimus Dorsi Transfer**: Converting an internal rotator/adductor to an external rotator. Can be done index or staged. - **Lateralized Implant**: Improves length tension of remaining posterior cuff. **Counseling**: It is hard to 'fix' this now. Tendon transfer is the only option but has rehab implications.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Reverse restores Elevation, NOT Rotation
Teres Minor is the key to ER
Lat Dorsi transfer is the salvage
COMMON TRAPS
✗Promising normal function pre-op
✗Missing the fatty infiltration on pre-op MRI
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe the technique of Lat Dorsi Transfer."
"What is the Hornblower's sign?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The 'Pseudoparalytic' Shoulder

EXAMINER

"Differentiate Pseudoparalysis from True Paralysis from Stiffness."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This distinction is the absolute crux of decision making in massive cuff tears. A Reverse TSA is indicated for Pseudoparalysis but contraindicated (or useless) for True Paralysis. 1. **Pseudoparalysis** (The 'Broken Engine'): - **Clinical**: Active Elevation less than 90 degrees, but Passive Elevation is FULL. - **Mechanism**: The rotator cuff 'force couple' is disrupted. The humeral head migrates superiorly, shortening the deltoid lever arm. - **Test**: Injection Test. Inject lidocaine. If pain is removed and they *still* cannot lift, it is true biomechanical failure. - **Treatment**: Best indication for **Reverse TSA**. 2. **True Paralysis** (The 'Broken Driver'): - **Clinical**: Active Elevation less than 90, Passive Elevation FULL. Same as above? No! Look at the muscle. - **Mechanism**: Neurologic injury. Axillary nerve (Deltoid) or Suprascapular nerve. - **Test**: Deltoid is flaccid. EMG/NCS confirms denervation. - **Treatment**: **Tendon Transfer** (e.g., Lower Trapezius transfer). Reverse TSA will FAIL. 3. **Pseudo-pseudoparalysis** (Stiffness/Pain): - **Clinical**: Active less than 90, AND Passive less than 90. - **Mechanism**: The joint is stiff (Capsulitis, OA) or pain inhibition prevents motion. - **Test**: Injection Test. Motion improves significantly once pain is gone. - **Treatment**: Conservative. **Physiotherapy**, Steroids, or Arthroscopic Release. Do not rush to replace.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Passive vs Active ROM is the discriminator
Injection test rules out pain inhibition
Nerve vs Muscle failure
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing stiffness with weakness
✗Operating on a nerve palsy
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Can you do a Reverse TSA for Axillary Nerve palsy?"
"What is the 'Escape Sign'?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pathophysiology

Q: What is the primary mechanical deficit in CTA? A: Loss of the Force Couple (Concavity Compression) and upward migration of the humeral head due to unopposed Deltoid pull.

Classification

Q: What distinguishes Seebauer 2A from 2B? A: Anterior instability. 2A is centered superiorly (stable under arch). 2B escapes antero-superiorly (unstable).

Biomechanics

Q: How does a Reverse TSA improve elevation? A: It Medializes the center of rotation (recruiting more deltoid fibers) & Distalizes the humerus (tensioning the deltoid).

Complications

Q: What is the most common complication of Grammont style Reverse TSA? A: Scapular Notching. (Though modern lateralized designs have reduced this).

Contraindications

Q: Which nerve must be functioning for a Reverse TSA? A: Axillary Nerve (Deltoid function). Without deltoid, the prosthesis won't work.

Australian Context

  • Trends: The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) reports a massive shift towards Reverse TSA.
    • In 2008, Reverse accounted for under 5% of shoulder replacements.
    • In 2023, Reverse accounts for over 80% of all shoulder arthroplasty for OA (including CTA and Primary OA).
  • Reason: The revision rate for Hemiarthroplasty for OA is significantly higher than Reverse TSA. Hemiarthroplasty for cuff deficiency has largely been abandoned in Australia.
  • Revision Rates (AOANJRR):
    • Primary Reverse TSA for OA: ~5-6% at 10 years.
    • Common reasons for revision: Infection (most common reason for early revision), Instability, Fracture.
    • Prosthesis Selection: In Australia, uncemented (fixation by screw) metal backed glenoids are the standard for Reverse (unlike Anatomic where cemented poly is standard). The Registry shows no difference between cemented and uncemented humeral stems for Reverse.
  • Interactive Data: The "Lifetime Risk of Revision" for a 70 year old male receiving a Reverse TSA is approx 5-8%, meaning it will likely last their lifetime.
  • Practice Points:
    • "Try Hemi first" is NO LONGER valid advice for the exam. The evidence (and registry) supports primary Reverse TSA.
    • Metal-backed glenoids in Anatomic TSA had high failure rates in Australia and are largely discouraged, but metal-backed baseplates are the standard for Reverse TSA.

Surgeon Volume and Outcomes

  • There is a clear "Volume-Outcome" relationship demonstrated in the AOANJRR. Surgeons performing fewer than 10 shoulder arthroplasties per year have significantly higher revision rates.
  • Implication: Shoulder arthroplasty is becoming a subspecialty operation.

Cost-Effectiveness

  • Reverse TSA is more expensive than Hemiarthroplasty (implants cost ~2-3x).
  • However, when factoring in the high revision rate of Hemi for CTA (conversion to Reverse), primary Reverse TSA is the most cost-effective strategy over a 10-year horizon.

Regional Practice Variations

  • Stemless Reverse: Increasing usage in Europe, but slower uptake in Australia pending long-term registry data.
  • Computer Navigation / PSI: High uptake in Australia (over 30% of cases). The registry is monitoring whether this reduces the outlier rate for glenoid placement (and thus loosening/notching).

CTA Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Diagnosis

  • •Pseudoparalysis
  • •High riding head
  • •Acetabularization
  • •Fluid Sign
  • •Hornblower's Sign

Classification

  • •Hamada (X-ray severity)
  • •Seebauer Type 1 (Stable)
  • •Seebauer Type 2 (Unstable/Escape)
  • •Favard (E-type glenoid)

Management

  • •Non-op (Physio/Inject) for low demand
  • •Reverse TSA (Gold Standard)
  • •Hemi (Historical)
  • •Arthrodesis (Salvage)

Reverse Biomechanics

  • •Medialize COR
  • •Lengthen Deltoid Lever
  • •Distalize Humerus
  • •Semi-constrained
  • •Recruit ant/post deltoid

Complications

  • •Scapular Notching
  • •Acromial Fracture
  • •Dislocation
  • •Infection
  • •Neuroapraxia
Quick Stats
Reading Time79 min
Related Topics

Ankle Arthrodesis

Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head

Elbow Arthritis

Hip Arthrodesis