Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Subtalar Dislocations

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Subtalar Dislocations

Pure subtalar dislocations (peritalar dislocations) - medial vs lateral types, closed reduction techniques, associated injuries, and outcomes

complete
Updated: 2025-12-16
High Yield Overview

SUBTALAR DISLOCATIONS

Peritalar Injury | TN + TC Joints | Medial 80% | Urgent Reduction | AVN Risk

80%Medial dislocations (most common)
15-40%Associated fracture rate
Under 6hTarget time for reduction
40-90%Good-excellent outcomes (closed injuries)

SUBTALAR DISLOCATION CLASSIFICATION

Medial (85%)
PatternFoot displaced medially, acquired clubfoot
TreatmentClosed reduction - traction, eversion
Lateral (15%)
PatternFoot displaced laterally, acquired flatfoot
TreatmentClosed reduction - traction, inversion
Anterior (rare)
PatternFoot displaced anteriorly
TreatmentClosed reduction - traction
Posterior (rare)
PatternFoot displaced posteriorly
TreatmentClosed reduction - traction

Critical Must-Knows

  • Two joints involved: Talonavicular AND talocalcaneal (tibiotalar intact)
  • Medial most common (85%): Foot inverted and adducted = 'acquired clubfoot'
  • Urgent reduction: Skin tension causes necrosis within hours
  • Associated fractures: CT after reduction - 40% have occult fractures
  • AVN risk: Talus has tenuous blood supply - prolonged dislocation increases risk

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Named by direction of FOOT relative to talus (medial = foot goes medial)
  • "
    Medial dislocation = adducted/inverted = 'acquired clubfoot' appearance
  • "
    Lateral dislocation = abducted/everted = 'acquired flatfoot' appearance
  • "
    CT mandatory after reduction to detect associated fractures
  • "
    Open dislocations have significantly worse outcomes

Exam Warning

Critical Exam Points - Subtalar Dislocations:

  1. JOINTS INVOLVED: Talonavicular + Talocalcaneal (NOT tibiotalar)
  2. MEDIAL IS MOST COMMON (85%): Foot displaced medial = acquired clubfoot appearance
  3. URGENT REDUCTION REQUIRED: Skin tension causes necrosis - reduce within hours
  4. CT AFTER REDUCTION: 40% have occult fractures - always scan after reduction
  5. REDUCTION TECHNIQUE: Knee flexed, traction, accentuate deformity then reverse
  6. OPEN INJURIES: Much worse prognosis - higher complication rates

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

FeatureMedial Dislocation (85%)Lateral Dislocation (15%)
Foot PositionAdducted and invertedAbducted and everted
AppearanceAcquired clubfootAcquired flatfoot
MechanismInversion force (most common)Eversion force
Reduction ManeuverTraction + EVERSIONTraction + INVERSION
Blocking StructureTalar head on navicular/EHLTalar head on cuboid/peroneal tendons
Open Injury RateLowerHigher (worse prognosis)
Mnemonic

PERITALARPERITALAR - Key Features

P
Paired joint dislocation
TN + TC
E
Emergency reduction required
skin necrosis risk
R
Radiographs before AND
after reduction
I
Inversion injury causes medial type
most common
T
Traction with knee
flexed for reduction
A
Associated fractures in 40%
CT mandatory
L
Lateral type has worse prognosis
higher open rate
A
AVN is a
late complication
R
Rehabilitation prolonged
subtalar stiffness common

Memory Hook:PERITALAR dislocations involve Paired joints, require Emergency reduction, and need CT to detect Associated fractures

Mnemonic

MEDIALMEDIAL - Medial Dislocation Features

M
Most common type
85%
E
Eversion to reduce
reverse the deformity
D
Dorsal talar head
prominence laterally
I
Inversion mechanism
Inversion mechanism
A
Acquired clubfoot appearance
Acquired clubfoot appearance
L
Less likely to
be open than lateral

Memory Hook:MEDIAL is Most common and needs Eversion to reduce

Overview

Subtalar Dislocations - Peritalar Dislocations

Subtalar dislocations are rare but dramatic injuries characterized by simultaneous dislocation of the talonavicular and talocalcaneal joints while the tibiotalar joint remains intact. Also called "peritalar dislocations," they represent approximately 1% of all dislocations and require urgent reduction to prevent skin necrosis and long-term complications.

Epidemiology

Incidence:

  • Rare injury - approximately 1% of all dislocations
  • 1-2% of major joint dislocations
  • Predominantly young males (70-80%)
  • Usually high-energy mechanism

Mechanism:

  • Motor vehicle accidents (40%)
  • Falls from height (30%)
  • Sports injuries (20%) - basketball, football
  • Direct trauma (10%)

Age Distribution:

  • Most common in 20-40 year age group
  • Rare in children and elderly
  • Associated with active lifestyle/sports

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Subtalar Complex Anatomy

The Subtalar Complex

Joints Involved in Subtalar Dislocation:

  1. Talonavicular joint (ball and socket)
  2. Talocalcaneal joint (subtalar joint proper)

Joint NOT Involved:

  • Tibiotalar joint - remains intact (talus stays in mortise)

This is why the injury is also called "peritalar dislocation" - the dislocation occurs AROUND the talus.

Blood Supply to the Talus

Critical Vascular Anatomy:

  • Posterior tibial artery: Main supply via artery of the tarsal canal
  • Anterior tibial artery: Supplies talar neck and head dorsally
  • Peroneal artery: Supplies via artery of the tarsal sinus

Why This Matters:

  • 60% of talus is covered by articular cartilage (no periosteal vessels)
  • Tenuous retrograde blood supply
  • Prolonged dislocation can compromise vessels
  • Risk of AVN, especially with delayed reduction

Vascular Anatomy Key Point

The talus has no muscle attachments and 60% articular cartilage coverage, making it dependent on intraosseous blood supply through the tarsal canal and sinus. Prolonged dislocation with stretched vessels significantly increases AVN risk.

Mechanism of Injury

Medial Dislocation (85%):

  • High-energy inversion force
  • Foot forced into plantarflexion and inversion
  • Common scenarios: falls, MVA, sports (basketball - "basketball foot")
  • Calcaneus, navicular, and forefoot displace medially under talus

Lateral Dislocation (15%):

  • High-energy eversion force
  • Foot forced into dorsiflexion and eversion
  • Usually requires greater force than medial
  • Higher association with open injuries and fractures

Understanding Direction

The dislocation is named by the direction of the FOOT relative to the talus:

  • Medial dislocation: Foot goes MEDIAL = adducted, inverted = "acquired clubfoot"
  • Lateral dislocation: Foot goes LATERAL = abducted, everted = "acquired flatfoot"

The talus remains in the ankle mortise in both types.

Structures That Can Block Reduction

Medial Dislocation (foot medial):

  • Talar head buttonholes through extensor retinaculum
  • EHL tendon may wrap around talar head
  • Tibialis posterior tendon occasionally blocks
  • Talonavicular capsule interposition

Lateral Dislocation (foot lateral):

  • Peroneal tendons wrap around talar neck
  • Talar head buttonholes through extensor retinaculum
  • FHL tendon may block
  • Posterior tibial tendon occasionally involved
Mnemonic

BLOCKBLOCK - Structures Blocking Reduction

B
Buttonholed extensor retinaculum
Buttonholed extensor retinaculum
L
Lateral = peroneal
tendons block
O
Often EHL blocks
medial dislocations
C
Capsule interposition
talonavicular
K
Key is to
accentuate deformity first then reverse

Memory Hook:If closed reduction BLOCKED, suspect soft tissue interposition - may need open reduction

Classification

Classification

Medial Subtalar Dislocation

Most Common Type (85%)

Mechanism:

  • High-energy inversion force
  • Plantarflexion and inversion
  • Falls, MVA, sports (basketball)

Foot Position:

  • Displaced MEDIALLY
  • Adducted and inverted
  • "Acquired clubfoot" appearance

Talar Head Prominence:

  • Prominent DORSOLATERALLY
  • Palpable and visible
  • Skin tension over prominence

Reduction Technique:

  • Knee flexed (relax gastrocnemius)
  • Longitudinal traction
  • Accentuate plantarflexion and inversion
  • Then EVERT and dorsiflex to reduce

Blocking Structures:

  • Extensor retinaculum (buttonholed)
  • EHL tendon wrapping talar head
  • Tibialis posterior tendon
  • Talonavicular capsule

Prognosis:

  • Better than lateral type
  • 60-90% good-excellent outcomes (pure dislocation)
  • Lower open injury rate
  • Lower complication rate

Summary: Medial is most common, has better prognosis, and is easier to reduce.

Lateral Subtalar Dislocation

Less Common Type (15%)

Mechanism:

  • High-energy eversion force
  • Usually requires greater force than medial
  • Dorsiflexion and eversion

Foot Position:

  • Displaced LATERALLY
  • Abducted and everted
  • "Acquired flatfoot" appearance

Talar Head Prominence:

  • Prominent DORSOMEDIALLY
  • Skin tension medially

Reduction Technique:

  • Knee flexed
  • Longitudinal traction
  • Accentuate eversion
  • Then INVERT to reduce

Blocking Structures:

  • Peroneal tendons wrapping talar neck
  • Extensor retinaculum
  • FHL tendon
  • Posterior tibial tendon

Prognosis:

  • WORSE than medial type
  • 20-40% good-excellent outcomes
  • Higher open injury rate (worse prognosis)
  • Higher complication rate (AVN, arthritis)

Summary: Lateral is less common but has significantly worse outcomes.

Anterior Subtalar Dislocation

Very Rare

Mechanism:

  • Forced dorsiflexion
  • Direct anterior force on heel

Foot Position:

  • Displaced anteriorly relative to talus
  • Forefoot displaced forward

Reduction:

  • Longitudinal traction
  • Plantarflex to disengage
  • Then reduce

Posterior Subtalar Dislocation

Very Rare

Mechanism:

  • Forced plantarflexion
  • Direct posterior force

Foot Position:

  • Displaced posteriorly relative to talus
  • Forefoot displaced backward

Reduction:

  • Longitudinal traction
  • Dorsiflex to disengage
  • Then reduce

Summary: Both anterior and posterior types are extremely rare and less well described in the literature.

Pure Dislocation

No Associated Fractures:

  • Better prognosis overall
  • 60-90% good-excellent outcomes
  • Lower complication rates
  • Standard closed reduction protocol
  • Immobilization for 4-6 weeks

Fracture-Dislocation

Associated Fractures (40%):

Common Fracture Sites:

  • Talar dome/neck (most common)
  • Talar body
  • Posterior process talus
  • Sustentaculum tali
  • Anterior process calcaneus
  • Navicular
  • Cuboid
  • Malleolar fractures (medial/lateral)

Management Impact:

  • CT mandatory to detect occult fractures
  • Large fragments (over 25% joint) may need ORIF
  • Small fragments may be excised
  • Changes prognosis significantly

Prognosis:

  • 40-60% good-excellent outcomes
  • Higher AVN risk
  • Higher post-traumatic arthritis rate

Open vs Closed

Open vs Closed Subtalar Dislocations

FeatureClosedOpen
PrognosisBetter (40-90% good)Poor (high complication rate)
Infection RiskLowHigh - requires debridement
AVN RateLowerHigher
Post-traumatic ArthritisLowerHigher
More Common WithMedial typeLateral type

Closed Injuries:

  • Standard management
  • Lower infection and AVN rates
  • Better long-term outcomes

Open Injuries:

  • Urgent surgical debridement required
  • Higher infection risk
  • Higher AVN and arthritis rates
  • More common with lateral dislocations
  • Significantly worse prognosis

Summary: Associated fractures worsen prognosis; open injuries have significantly higher complication rates.

Clinical Assessment

Initial Assessment

Presentation

Obvious Deformity:

  • Medial: Foot appears adducted and inverted ("acquired clubfoot")

    • Talar head prominent DORSOLATERALLY
    • Heel in varus
  • Lateral: Foot appears abducted and everted ("acquired flatfoot")

    • Talar head prominent DORSOMEDIALLY
    • Heel in valgus

Associated Features:

  • Significant swelling
  • Severe pain
  • Unable to weight bear
  • Skin tension - may be tented over talar head
  • Open wounds (check carefully)

Skin Assessment - Critical

Skin Emergency

Skin tension over the talar head is an EMERGENCY

The prominent talar head causes extreme skin tension that can lead to:

  • Necrosis within hours
  • Full-thickness skin loss
  • Open conversion of closed injury
  • Infection risk

Immediate reduction is mandatory to relieve skin tension.

Neurovascular Examination

Pre-Reduction Assessment:

  • Dorsalis pedis pulse (may be displaced)
  • Posterior tibial pulse
  • Capillary refill
  • Sensory examination (if patient can cooperate)
    • Superficial peroneal (dorsum of foot)
    • Deep peroneal (first web space)
    • Tibial nerve (plantar foot)
    • Sural nerve (lateral foot)

Document Before AND After Reduction:

  • Changes in vascular status
  • Sensory changes
  • Motor function once pain controlled

Associated Injuries to Assess

Local:

  • Open wounds (check carefully between toes)
  • Associated fractures (malleoli, talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid)
  • Ankle mortise integrity
  • Skin condition

Systemic:

  • High-energy mechanism - assess for polytrauma
  • Spine injuries
  • Other extremity injuries
  • Head injury

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

Pre-Reduction X-rays

Required Views:

  • AP foot
  • Lateral foot
  • AP ankle
  • Lateral ankle

What to Assess:

  1. Confirm subtalar dislocation (TN and TC disrupted)
  2. Confirm tibiotalar joint intact
  3. Identify obvious fractures
  4. Determine direction of dislocation

Don't Delay Reduction for Perfect X-rays: If skin is compromised, reduce emergently based on clinical findings and whatever imaging is immediately available.

Post-Reduction Imaging

X-rays:

  • Confirm congruent reduction of TN and TC joints
  • Check ankle mortise alignment
  • Assess any fractures now visible after reduction

CT Scan - MANDATORY:

CT After Reduction

Always get CT after successful reduction of a subtalar dislocation:

  • 40% of subtalar dislocations have associated fractures
  • Many are occult on plain X-rays
  • May change management if large fragments present
  • Identifies loose bodies
  • Assesses congruency of reduction

CT Assessment:

  • Talar dome and neck fractures
  • Posterior process fractures
  • Calcaneal fractures (sustentaculum, anterior process)
  • Navicular fractures
  • Cuboid fractures
  • Loose bodies
  • Reduction congruency

MRI (Rarely Indicated Acutely)

Potential Indications:

  • Suspected chondral injury
  • Soft tissue interposition preventing reduction
  • Late presentation with concerns for AVN
  • Usually delayed investigation

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
subtalar dislocations management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for subtalar dislocationsCredit: OrthoVellum

Management Algorithm

Initial Emergency Department Management

Immediate Assessment:

  1. Neurovascular examination and documentation
  2. Skin assessment - tented skin is emergency
  3. Check for open wounds
  4. Pain control

Imaging:

  • AP and lateral foot X-rays
  • AP and lateral ankle X-rays
  • Do NOT delay reduction if skin compromised
  • Imaging confirms diagnosis and direction

Priority:

  • Skin tension over talar head = URGENT reduction
  • Can occur within hours of injury
  • Risk of skin necrosis and full-thickness loss
  • May convert closed to open injury

Setup:

  • Patient supine
  • Procedural sedation or regional anesthesia
  • Assistant for counter-traction
  • Fluoroscopy helpful but not mandatory

Key Point: Skin tension is the primary driver of urgency.

Closed Reduction Technique

Reduction Steps

General Principles:

  1. Flex the knee (relaxes gastrocnemius)
  2. Apply longitudinal traction
  3. Accentuate the deformity first (unlocks the dislocation)
  4. Reverse the deformity to reduce

For MEDIAL Dislocation:

  • Traction with knee flexed
  • ACCENTUATE: Increase plantarflexion and inversion momentarily
  • REDUCE: While maintaining traction, EVERT and dorsiflex the foot
  • Direct pressure on talar head dorsally may assist
  • Audible "clunk" usually felt with reduction

For LATERAL Dislocation:

  • Traction with knee flexed
  • ACCENTUATE: Increase eversion momentarily
  • REDUCE: While maintaining traction, INVERT the foot
  • Direct pressure on talar head
Mnemonic

REDUCEREDUCE - Reduction Steps

R
Relax gastrocnemius by
flexing knee
E
Employ longitudinal traction
Employ longitudinal traction
D
Deformity
accentuate first to unlock
U
Undo the deformity
reverse direction
C
Clunk heard/felt with
successful reduction
E
Evaluate with X-ray
and CT

Memory Hook:To REDUCE a subtalar dislocation: Relax the gastroc, traction, accentuate then reverse deformity

Success Rate:

  • 80-90% successful with closed reduction
  • Medial type more successful than lateral
  • Requires adequate sedation/muscle relaxation

Post-Reduction Immediate Care:

  • Confirm reduction with X-rays
  • Below-knee backslab
  • Neurovascular reassessment
  • Schedule CT scan

Success Indicator: Audible/palpable "clunk" with successful reduction.

Failed Closed Reduction

Causes of Failure:

  • Soft tissue interposition (tendons, capsule)
  • Buttonholed extensor retinaculum
  • Associated fracture fragments blocking
  • Inadequate analgesia/muscle relaxation

Management:

  1. Consider general anesthesia with complete muscle relaxation
  2. Attempt closed reduction under GA
  3. If still fails, proceed to open reduction

Open Reduction - Surgical Technique

Indications:

  • Failed closed reduction (irreducible)
  • Open injury requiring debridement
  • Large associated fractures requiring ORIF
  • Interposed soft tissues confirmed on imaging

Approach Selection:

Medial Dislocation:

  • Anteromedial approach
  • Between EHL and tibialis anterior
  • Allows access to blocking structures

Lateral Dislocation:

  • Anterolateral approach
  • Allows access to peroneal tendons
  • May need dual incisions

Operative Steps:

  1. Skin incision based on dislocation type
  2. Identify blocking structure (usually tendon or retinaculum)
  3. Release or retract blocking tissue
  4. Reduce talonavicular joint under direct vision
  5. Reduce talocalcaneal joint
  6. Confirm congruent reduction
  7. Repair soft tissues if possible
  8. K-wire stabilization if unstable (rare)
  9. Address associated fractures if needed

Post-Operative:

  • Below-knee splint
  • Non-weight bearing
  • Higher risk of complications vs closed reduction

Note: Open reduction is required in 10-20% of cases.

Management of Associated Fractures

Detection:

  • CT scan MANDATORY after reduction
  • 40% have occult fractures
  • Changes management in 20% of cases

Small Fragments (Under 25% Joint Surface):

  • Conservative management
  • Monitor with serial X-rays
  • May excise if loose body causing symptoms
  • Usually do not affect stability

Large Fragments (Over 25% Joint Surface):

  • Consider ORIF
  • Particularly if affecting joint congruency
  • Particularly if affecting stability

Specific Fracture Management:

Talar Neck/Body Fractures:

  • Often require ORIF
  • Screws from anterior to posterior
  • Follow Hawkins classification principles
  • Higher AVN risk

Malleolar Fractures:

  • Fix if unstable ankle mortise
  • Standard ORIF techniques

Calcaneal Fractures:

  • Sustentaculum or anterior process
  • Usually conservative unless large

Navicular/Cuboid Fractures:

  • Large fragments may need fixation
  • Small fragments often conservative

Key Point: CT mandatory after ALL subtalar dislocations - 40% have occult fractures.

Surgical Technique

Surgical Approaches for Open Reduction

Indications for Open Reduction

Absolute Indications:

  • Irreducible closed reduction (soft tissue interposition)
  • Open dislocation requiring debridement
  • Large displaced fracture-dislocation requiring fixation

Relative Indications:

  • Failed closed reduction under GA with complete muscle relaxation
  • Associated fractures requiring ORIF
  • Persistent instability after closed reduction (rare)

Success Rates:

  • 80-90% of subtalar dislocations reduce with closed technique
  • 10-20% require open reduction
  • Most failures due to soft tissue interposition

Note: Most subtalar dislocations can be successfully reduced with proper technique and adequate analgesia/muscle relaxation.

Anteromedial Approach

Indications:

  • Medial subtalar dislocations with failed closed reduction
  • Access to medial blocking structures (EHL, tibialis posterior)
  • Talar neck fractures requiring fixation

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine
  • Bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Tourniquet on thigh

Incision:

  • Longitudinal incision over talonavicular joint
  • Between tibialis anterior (medial) and EHL (lateral)
  • Approximately 6-8 cm length
  • Centered over talar head prominence

Operative Steps:

  1. Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue
  2. Identify and protect dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve
  3. Retract EHL laterally, tibialis anterior medially
  4. Identify talonavicular joint capsule
  5. Incise capsule longitudinally
  6. Identify blocking structure (often EHL tendon or capsule)
  7. Release interposed tissue carefully
  8. Reduce talonavicular joint under direct vision
  9. Assess talocalcaneal joint reduction
  10. Repair capsule if possible
  11. K-wire stabilization rarely needed

Neurovascular Structures at Risk:

  • Dorsalis pedis artery (between EHL and EDB)
  • Deep peroneal nerve (runs with artery)
  • Superficial peroneal nerve (more lateral)

Pearls:

  • Protect dorsalis pedis and deep peroneal nerve throughout
  • EHL tendon often wrapped around talar head in failed reductions
  • Gentle tissue handling to preserve blood supply

The anteromedial approach provides excellent visualization of the talonavicular joint and is the workhorse approach for most medial subtalar dislocations requiring open reduction.

Anterolateral Approach

Indications:

  • Lateral subtalar dislocations with failed closed reduction
  • Access to lateral blocking structures (peroneal tendons)
  • Lateral process talus fractures requiring fixation

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine
  • Bump under contralateral hip
  • Tourniquet on thigh

Incision:

  • Longitudinal incision lateral to EHL
  • Over talar head prominence (usually dorsomedially)
  • Approximately 6-8 cm

Operative Steps:

  1. Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue
  2. Identify and protect superficial peroneal nerve branches
  3. Identify peroneal tendons (often blocking reduction)
  4. Retract peroneal tendons to expose talar head
  5. Release capsule if interposed
  6. Reduce talonavicular and talocalcaneal joints under direct vision
  7. Assess stability of reduction
  8. Repair soft tissues if possible

Neurovascular Structures at Risk:

  • Superficial peroneal nerve branches (multiple)
  • Peroneal tendons (may be wrapped around talus)
  • Sural nerve more posteriorly

Pearls:

  • Lateral dislocations often have peroneal tendons as blocking structure
  • Multiple superficial peroneal nerve branches - protect all
  • Lateral type has higher open injury rate

The anterolateral approach is specifically designed for lateral subtalar dislocations and provides access to the peroneal tendons, which are the most common blocking structures in this type.

Post-Operative Protocol After Open Reduction

Immediate Post-Op (0-2 Weeks):

  • Below-knee backslab splint
  • Elevate extremity
  • Ice for swelling
  • Neurovascular checks every 2 hours x 24h
  • DVT prophylaxis (rivaroxaban or enoxaparin)
  • Pain management

Early Post-Op (2-6 Weeks):

  • Wound check at 2 weeks
  • Suture removal at 2-3 weeks
  • Transition to CAM boot at 2-3 weeks
  • Non-weight bearing for 6 weeks typically
  • Ankle ROM exercises if tibiotalar stable
  • Do NOT stress subtalar joint

Progressive Loading (6-12 Weeks):

  • X-rays at 6 weeks to confirm healing
  • Begin partial weight bearing (25-50%)
  • Progress to full weight bearing by 8-10 weeks
  • Wean from CAM boot to supportive shoe
  • Begin gentle subtalar ROM

Rehabilitation:

  • Physical therapy for ROM and strengthening
  • Proprioception training
  • Gait retraining
  • Gradual return to activities

Important Notes:

  • Open reduction has higher complication risk than closed
  • Monitor closely for infection, AVN, arthritis
  • Rehabilitation same as closed reduction but may be prolonged

Post-operative management after open reduction mirrors that of closed reduction but requires careful wound monitoring and may have a slightly longer immobilization period.

Complications

Acute Complications

Skin Necrosis

Most Urgent Acute Complication:

  • Occurs with prolonged dislocation
  • Skin tented over talar head
  • Can develop within 6-12 hours
  • Full-thickness skin loss possible
  • May convert closed to open injury
  • Prevention: Urgent reduction

Neurovascular Injury

Incidence: 5-10% of cases

Nerve Injuries:

  • Superficial peroneal nerve (most common)
  • Deep peroneal nerve
  • Tibial nerve
  • Usually neurapraxia from stretch
  • Most recover with time

Vascular Injuries:

  • Dorsalis pedis artery injury rare
  • Posterior tibial artery injury rare
  • Compartment syndrome (very rare)

Inability to Reduce

Failed Closed Reduction (10-20%):

  • Soft tissue interposition
  • Buttonholed extensor retinaculum
  • EHL tendon (medial dislocation)
  • Peroneal tendons (lateral dislocation)
  • Requires open reduction

Compartment Syndrome

Very Rare but Possible:

  • High-energy injuries
  • Associated fractures
  • Prolonged dislocation
  • Monitor closely first 48 hours
  • High index of suspicion needed

Chronic Complications

Post-Traumatic Arthritis

Most Common Long-Term Complication:

Incidence by Injury Type:

  • Pure closed medial: 30-40%
  • Fracture-dislocation: 50-70%
  • Open or lateral: 60-80%

Time Course:

  • May take 5-10 years to develop
  • Progressive symptoms
  • Joint space narrowing on X-ray
  • Subtalar crepitus and pain

Management:

  • Activity modification
  • Orthotics and supportive footwear
  • NSAIDs for pain
  • Corticosteroid injections
  • Subtalar fusion if severe (good pain relief, further stiffness)

Prognosis:

  • Fusion provides reliable pain relief
  • Further loss of inversion/eversion
  • Often well-tolerated

Avascular Necrosis (AVN)

Incidence:

  • Pure dislocation: 5-10%
  • Fracture-dislocation: 15-20%
  • Open injury: 20-30%
  • Higher with delayed reduction

Risk Factors:

  • Delayed reduction (over 6 hours)
  • High-energy mechanism
  • Associated talar neck fracture
  • Open injury
  • Need for open reduction

Presentation:

  • Initially asymptomatic
  • Pain develops as collapse occurs
  • Progressive deformity
  • Eventually arthritis

Detection:

  • Hawkins sign at 6-8 weeks (subchondral lucency = good blood supply)
  • Absence of Hawkins sign concerning for AVN
  • MRI most sensitive for early detection
  • X-ray changes later (sclerosis, collapse)

Management:

  • Protected weight bearing if detected early
  • Core decompression rarely beneficial
  • Usually progresses to fusion if symptomatic
  • May require talonavicular or triple fusion

Subtalar Stiffness

Universal Complication:

Expected Loss of Motion:

  • 50-70% loss of subtalar motion typical
  • Inversion more affected than eversion
  • Often well-compensated by ankle and midfoot
  • Stiffness may protect against arthritis pain

Functional Impact:

  • Walking on flat ground usually normal
  • Difficulty on uneven terrain
  • Difficulty on slopes/inclines
  • May need orthotic support

Treatment:

  • Aggressive physical therapy for ROM
  • Orthotic devices for support
  • Ankle-foot orthosis if severe
  • Most patients adapt well

Chronic Pain

Incidence: 10-40% depending on injury severity

Sources:

  • Post-traumatic arthritis
  • Subtalar stiffness
  • Nerve injury (neuroma, dysesthesia)
  • Complex regional pain syndrome (rare)

Management:

  • Multimodal pain management
  • Physical therapy
  • Psychological support
  • Orthotics
  • Surgical options if structural cause

Malunion/Nonunion (with Associated Fractures)

Talar Fracture Malunion:

  • Alters hindfoot alignment
  • Accelerates arthritis
  • May need osteotomy or fusion

Nonunion:

  • Rare with adequate immobilization
  • May occur with talar neck fractures
  • Usually requires surgical fixation

Prevention of Complications

Early Reduction

Single Most Important Factor:

  • Reduces skin necrosis risk
  • Reduces AVN risk
  • Improves overall outcomes
  • Target: Reduction within 6 hours

CT Scanning

Detects Occult Fractures:

  • Changes management in 20% of cases
  • Allows appropriate fixation
  • Prevents displacement during healing
  • Improves long-term outcomes

Adequate Immobilization

Prevents Redislocation:

  • 4-6 weeks immobilization typical
  • Non-weight bearing essential
  • Progressive loading protocol
  • Serial X-rays to monitor

Aggressive Rehabilitation

Optimizes Function:

  • ROM exercises after immobilization
  • Strengthening program
  • Proprioception training
  • Return to activity protocol

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1: Protection (0-6 Weeks)

Weeks 0-2:

  • Below-knee backslab or cast
  • Strictly non-weight bearing
  • Crutches or knee scooter
  • Elevation and ice
  • DVT prophylaxis (rivaroxaban or enoxaparin)
  • Monitor for compartment syndrome (first 48h)

Weeks 2-6:

  • Transition to CAM boot or short leg cast
  • Continue non-weight bearing
  • Begin ankle ROM exercises (if tibiotalar stable)
  • Gentle active dorsiflexion/plantarflexion
  • Do NOT invert/evert (protect subtalar healing)

X-ray Schedule:

  • Post-reduction (immediate)
  • 2 weeks
  • 6 weeks

CT Scan:

  • MANDATORY after reduction to detect occult fractures
  • Usually performed within 24-48 hours of reduction

Phase 2: Progressive Loading (6-12 Weeks)

Weeks 6-8:

  • X-rays to confirm healing
  • Begin partial weight bearing in CAM boot (25-50%)
  • Progressive increase based on pain
  • Continue ankle ROM
  • Begin gentle subtalar ROM

Weeks 8-12:

  • Progress to full weight bearing
  • Wean from CAM boot to supportive shoe
  • Physical therapy 2-3x per week
  • Focus on proprioception and balance
  • Strengthening exercises

Phase 3: Return to Function (3-6 Months)

Months 3-4:

  • Full weight bearing in regular shoes
  • Progress strengthening
  • Sport-specific training if applicable
  • Continue balance and proprioception work

Months 4-6:

  • Return to sports/full activity
  • May have persistent subtalar stiffness
  • Monitor for signs of post-traumatic arthritis

Monitoring for Complications

Avascular Necrosis (AVN):

  • Hawkins sign on X-ray at 6-8 weeks (subchondral lucency = good blood supply)
  • Absence of Hawkins sign may indicate AVN
  • MRI if high clinical suspicion
  • Peak incidence 12-24 months post-injury

Post-Traumatic Arthritis:

  • May not manifest for years
  • Serial X-rays if symptomatic
  • Consider subtalar fusion if symptomatic arthritis develops

Subtalar Stiffness:

  • Universal to some degree
  • Often well-tolerated
  • Physical therapy for ROM
  • May protect against arthritis pain

Long-Term Follow-Up

Schedule:

  • 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
  • Then as needed if symptomatic

What to Assess:

  • Pain levels
  • ROM (especially subtalar inversion/eversion)
  • Gait pattern
  • Return to work/sport
  • X-ray changes (arthritis, AVN)

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors

Factors Associated with Better Outcomes

Patient Factors:

  • Younger age (under 40 years)
  • Higher activity level pre-injury
  • Non-smoker
  • Healthy BMI

Injury Factors:

  • Medial dislocation (vs lateral)
  • Closed injury (vs open)
  • Pure dislocation (no associated fractures)
  • Early reduction (within 6 hours)
  • Successful closed reduction (vs open)

Factors Associated with Worse Outcomes

Injury Factors:

  • Lateral dislocation (much worse than medial)
  • Open injury (infection, AVN, arthritis rates all higher)
  • Associated fractures (fracture-dislocation)
  • Delayed reduction (over 12 hours)
  • Need for open reduction
  • High-energy mechanism

Expected Outcomes by Injury Type

Pure Closed Medial Dislocation

Best Prognosis Group

Good-Excellent Outcomes: 60-90%

  • Most return to work
  • Many return to sport (may be delayed)
  • Subtalar stiffness common but often asymptomatic

Complications:

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 30-40%
  • AVN: 5-10%
  • Persistent stiffness: Common (often well-tolerated)
  • Chronic pain: 10-20%

Return to Activity:

  • Sedentary work: 2-3 months
  • Manual labor: 4-6 months
  • Contact sports: 6-9 months
  • May never regain full subtalar motion

Fracture-Dislocation (Closed)

Moderate Prognosis

Good-Excellent Outcomes: 40-60%

Complications:

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 50-70%
  • AVN: 15-20%
  • Persistent pain: 30-40%

Outcome Depends On:

  • Size and location of fracture
  • Quality of reduction
  • Successful fixation if needed

Lateral or Open Dislocations

Poor Prognosis

Good-Excellent Outcomes: 20-40%

Complications:

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 60-80%
  • AVN: 20-30%
  • Infection (open injuries): 10-30%
  • Chronic pain: 40-60%
  • Need for salvage procedure: 20-40%

Salvage Procedures:

  • Subtalar fusion (most common)
  • Triple arthrodesis
  • Below-knee amputation (severe cases)

Functional Outcomes

Subtalar Motion

Normal Subtalar Motion:

  • Inversion: 20-30 degrees
  • Eversion: 10-20 degrees

After Subtalar Dislocation:

  • Expect 50-70% loss of motion
  • Inversion more affected than eversion
  • Often well-compensated by ankle and midfoot
  • Stiffness may protect against arthritis pain

Activities of Daily Living

Most Patients:

  • Normal walking on flat ground
  • Difficulty on uneven terrain
  • Difficulty with slopes/stairs
  • May need orthotic support

Return to Sport

Low Impact (walking, cycling): 3-4 months typical Moderate Impact (running): 6-9 months typical High Impact (basketball, football): 9-12 months typical Elite Athletes: May not return to pre-injury level

Evidence Base

Key Studies and Evidence

Long-Term Outcomes of Subtalar Dislocation

Level IV
Merchan EC • Injury (1992)
Key Findings:
  • Follow-up of 39 subtalar dislocations at mean 8.8 years. 70% good-excellent outcomes overall. Medial dislocations had better outcomes than lateral. Open injuries and associated fractures were negative prognostic factors. Post-traumatic arthritis was the most common complication.
  • Key point: 70% good-excellent outcomes overall, but lateral and open injuries fare worse
Clinical Implication: Provides prognostic information for counselling patients - medial closed dislocations have good outcomes while lateral open injuries with fractures have guarded prognosis.

Role of CT in Subtalar Dislocation

Level IV
Bibbo C, et al • Foot Ankle Int (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Study demonstrating that 40% of subtalar dislocations have associated fractures not visible on plain X-rays. CT scan after reduction changed management in 20% of cases by identifying fractures requiring fixation or loose bodies requiring removal.
  • Key point: CT is mandatory after reduction - 40% have occult fractures
Clinical Implication: Justifies routine post-reduction CT scanning - identifies occult fractures in 40% that may require operative fixation and prevents missed injuries.

Classification and Treatment

Level IV
DeLee JC, Curtis R • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Classic paper on subtalar dislocations defining the classification system by direction of dislocation. Established medial as most common (85%), described reduction techniques, and identified prognostic factors. Emphasized urgency of reduction for skin viability.
  • Key point: Medial 85%, lateral 15% - urgent reduction essential for skin
Clinical Implication: Foundational paper establishing the classification system and treatment principles still used today - emphasizes urgent reduction within 6 hours to prevent skin necrosis.

Open Subtalar Dislocations

Level IV
Bohay DR, Manoli A • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1995)
Key Findings:
  • Series of open subtalar dislocations demonstrating significantly worse outcomes compared to closed injuries. Higher rates of infection, AVN, and post-traumatic arthritis. Recommended aggressive debridement and early soft tissue coverage.
Clinical Implication: Open subtalar dislocations have a poor prognosis with high complication rates, requiring urgent debridement and often soft tissue coverage.

Factors Affecting Outcome

Level IV
Zimmer TJ, Johnson KA • Foot Ankle (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Analysis of factors affecting outcome after subtalar dislocation. Identified associated fractures, lateral direction, and open wounds as negative prognostic factors. Emphasized importance of anatomic reduction and early mobilization after adequate healing.
Clinical Implication: Lateral direction, open wounds, and associated fractures are key negative prognostic factors to discuss with patients.

Summary of Evidence

Level IV Evidence Dominates:

  • Most studies are case series and retrospective reviews
  • No randomized controlled trials exist
  • Injury is too rare for prospective trials

Consistent Findings Across Studies:

  1. Medial dislocation is most common (80-85%)
  2. CT detects occult fractures in 40% of cases
  3. Open and lateral dislocations have worse outcomes
  4. Early reduction is critical for skin viability
  5. Post-traumatic arthritis is most common long-term complication

Knowledge Gaps:

  • Optimal immobilization duration not well-defined
  • Role of K-wire stabilization unclear
  • Rehabilitation protocols not standardized
  • Long-term functional outcome studies needed

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 25-year-old basketball player presents after a fall landing on an inverted foot. The foot is markedly deformed with an adducted and inverted position. The skin is tented over a prominent bony structure dorsolaterally. How would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Immediate Assessment:

  • Neurovascular examination and documentation
  • Assessment of skin viability - tented skin is emergency
  • Rapid assessment for open wounds
  • Brief history of mechanism

Imaging:

  • Quick X-rays if skin allows (AP and lateral foot/ankle)
  • Do NOT delay reduction for imaging if skin compromised
  • Confirm subtalar dislocation (TN and TC disrupted, tibiotalar intact)

Reduction:

  • Procedural sedation in ED
  • Flex knee to relax gastrocnemius
  • Apply longitudinal traction
  • Accentuate deformity (increase inversion momentarily)
  • While maintaining traction, EVERT and dorsiflex the foot
  • Direct pressure on talar head may assist
  • Expect audible/palpable "clunk"

Post-Reduction:

  • Confirm reduction with X-rays
  • CT scan mandatory - 40% have occult fractures
  • Below-knee backslab
  • Non-weight bearing 2-4 weeks
  • Total immobilization 4-6 weeks

Prognosis:

For a closed medial dislocation reduced promptly, expect 60-90% good-excellent outcome. Subtalar stiffness is common but often asymptomatic. Post-traumatic arthritis may develop over years.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnosis: Medial Subtalar Dislocation (Acquired Clubfoot)
Emergency: Tented skin risks necrosis
Reduction: Knee Flexed, Traction, Accentuate Deformity, Evert
Post-Reduction: CT Mandatory (40% occult fractures)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying reduction for X-rays when skin is compromised
✗Confusing medial (inv) vs lateral (ev) dislocations
✗Forgetting post-reduction CT scan
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What structures block reduction?"
"What are the long-term complications?"
"How does the prognosis compare to lateral dislocation?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"You are unable to reduce a subtalar dislocation despite adequate sedation. What would you do next?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Causes of Failed Reduction:

  • Soft tissue interposition (tendons, capsule)
  • Buttonholed extensor retinaculum
  • Fracture fragments blocking
  • Inadequate analgesia/muscle relaxation

Next Steps:

  1. Ensure adequate muscle relaxation - consider general anesthesia
  2. If skin compromised, proceed urgently to OR
  3. Attempt reduction under GA with complete paralysis
  4. If still fails, proceed to open reduction

Open Reduction:

  • Approach depends on dislocation direction
  • Medial dislocation: anteromedial approach
  • Lateral dislocation: anterolateral approach
  • Identify blocking structure (usually tendon)
  • Release/retract blocking tissue
  • Reduce under direct vision
  • Repair soft tissues
  • Address any associated fractures

Post-Operative Care:

Same protocol as closed reduction - splint, non-weight bearing, CT scan if not already done, progression to CAM boot at 2-4 weeks.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Cause: Soft Tissue Interposition (Buttonholing)
Medial Block: EHL, Extensor Retinaculum, TN Capsule
Lateral Block: Peroneal Tendons, FHL
Mgmt: GA with paralysis then Open Reduction if fails
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forcing reduction (risks iatrogenic fracture)
✗Ignoring neurovascular status before/after attempts
✗Using wrong approach for open reduction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Which approach for medial dislocation?"
"What specific structure causes 'buttonholing'?"
"What is the prognosis after open reduction?"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

EXAMINER

"Post-reduction CT of a subtalar dislocation shows a talar neck fracture involving 30% of the joint surface. How does this change your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Significance of Finding:

  • This is now a fracture-dislocation (worse prognosis)
  • 30% articular involvement is significant
  • Talar neck fractures have high AVN risk (Hawkins classification applies)
  • Combined injury has 40-60% good outcomes (vs 60-90% pure dislocation)

Management Changes:

  • Surgical fixation likely needed for talar neck fracture
  • Timing depends on soft tissue status
  • ORIF via anteromedial or dual approach
  • Screws from anterior to posterior typically
  • Restore talar neck length and alignment

Post-Operative Protocol:

  • Non-weight bearing extended (8-12 weeks typically)
  • Serial X-rays to monitor for AVN (Hawkins sign at 6-8 weeks)
  • MRI if concern for AVN
  • Protect until union confirmed

Prognosis Discussion:

  • AVN risk: 15-20% (higher than pure dislocation)
  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 50-70%
  • May require fusion if symptomatic arthritis develops
  • Counsel patient regarding guarded prognosis
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnosis: Fracture-Dislocation (Worse Prognosis)
Indication: Greater than 25% articular surface = ORIF
Risks: High AVN rate (Hawkins), Arthritis
Mgmt: ORIF Talar Neck (Anterior to Posterior Screws)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating conservatively (high risk of arthritis)
✗Ignoring AVN risk monitoring (Hawkins sign)
✗Providing overly optimistic prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What represents a 'Hawkins Sign'?"
"When does AVN typically present?"
"What is the salvage for painful arthritis?"

MCQ Practice Points

High-Yield Exam Facts

Definition and Classification

Q: What defines a subtalar dislocation? A: Simultaneous dislocation of the Talonavicular and Talocalcaneal joints, while the Tibiotalar joint remains intact.

Q: Which type is most common? A: Medial (85%) - caused by inversion (basketball foot), foot displaced medially ("acquired clubfoot").

Emergency Management

Q: Why is skin tension an emergency? A: Tented skin over the talar head can necrose within hours. Immediate reduction is mandatory before imaging if skin is compromised.

Q: What is the reduction maneuver? A: Knee flexed (relax gastroc), Traction, Accentuate Deformity, then Reverse Deformity. Medial needs Eversion; Lateral needs Inversion.

Imaging Protocol

Q: What is the critical imaging step after reduction? A: CT Scan is MANDATORY. 40% of cases have occult fractures not visible on X-ray, which may change management.

Complications and Prognosis

Q: What is the most common long-term complication? A: Post-traumatic arthritis (30-40% in pure dislocations, higher in fracture-dislocations).

Q: Which factors predict a worse outcome? A: Lateral dislocation, Open injury, Associated fractures, and Delayed reduction.

Exam Traps

Q: What structure commonly blocks reduction in medial dislocations? A: The Extensor Retinaculum (buttonholing) or the EHL tendon.

Q: How do you distinguish Subtalar from Total Talar dislocation? A: In Subtalar, the Tibiotalar joint is intact. In Total Talar, the talus is dislocated from the tibia as well (extruded).

Australian Context

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia

Subtalar dislocations are rare injuries in the Australian trauma system, accounting for approximately 1% of major joint dislocations. Most occur in the younger, active population (ages 20-40 years) through motor vehicle accidents, sporting injuries (particularly Australian Rules Football, rugby, and basketball), and workplace injuries in manual labor occupations.

The injury is more common in males (70-80%) and is typically seen in major trauma centers rather than regional hospitals due to the high-energy mechanisms often involved.

Emergency Department Management

Initial management follows standard protocols:

  • Triage as Category 2 (emergency) if skin threatened
  • Procedural sedation with propofol or ketamine commonly used
  • Regional anesthesia (ankle block) less common for reduction
  • Most emergency departments attempt closed reduction
  • Transfer to orthopedic theater if failed reduction

Imaging protocols:

  • Plain X-rays performed in ED
  • CT scan typically performed within 24 hours post-reduction
  • Most major trauma centers have 24-hour CT access

Surgical Management

Open reductions are typically performed by orthopedic foot and ankle specialists or trauma surgeons. Most major hospitals have on-call orthopedic coverage capable of managing these injuries.

Rehabilitation usually involves public hospital physiotherapy services or private physiotherapy depending on patient insurance status. CAM boots and crutches are provided through hospital orthotic services.

Return to Work and Compensation

Many patients are covered under workers' compensation schemes if injury occurred at work. Return to work timelines vary significantly based on occupation type, with manual laborers requiring longer periods off work (4-6 months) compared to sedentary workers (2-3 months).

Patients involved in motor vehicle accidents may have Transport Accident Commission (Victoria) or equivalent state-based compensation coverage for ongoing treatment and rehabilitation costs.

Preventive Strategies

Australian workplace health and safety regulations mandate appropriate footwear and fall prevention strategies in high-risk occupations. Sports medicine organizations promote ankle proprioception training and appropriate footwear for field sports to reduce inversion/eversion injuries.

Subtalar Dislocations - Exam Quick Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

DEFINITION

  • •Dislocation of BOTH talonavicular AND talocalcaneal joints
  • •Tibiotalar joint remains INTACT
  • •Also called 'peritalar dislocation'
  • •Named by direction of FOOT relative to talus

TYPES

  • •MEDIAL (85%): Foot medial = acquired clubfoot
  • •LATERAL (15%): Foot lateral = acquired flatfoot
  • •Anterior and posterior are rare
  • •Medial has better prognosis than lateral

EMERGENCY

  • •Tented skin = URGENT reduction needed
  • •Skin necrosis within hours if unreduced
  • •Do NOT delay for imaging if skin compromised
  • •Document neurovascular status before and after

REDUCTION TECHNIQUE

  • •Flex knee (relax gastrocnemius)
  • •Longitudinal traction
  • •ACCENTUATE deformity first
  • •REVERSE: Medial = evert; Lateral = invert

CT MANDATORY

  • •40% have occult fractures on CT
  • •Plain X-rays miss many injuries
  • •CT changes management in 20%
  • •Always scan after successful reduction
Quick Stats
Reading Time113 min
Related Topics

Jones Fractures

Lateral Compression Pelvic Injuries

Metatarsal Stress Fractures

Pseudo-Jones Fractures (Fifth Metatarsal Tuberosity Avulsion)