Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Three-Column Osteotomies

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Three-Column Osteotomies

Comprehensive guide to three-column osteotomies including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and vertebral column resection for complex spinal deformity correction

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

THREE-COLUMN OSTEOTOMIES

Complex Deformity Correction | Pedicle Subtraction | Vertebral Column Resection

30-40°correction per PSO level
60-90°correction with VCR
10-30%major complication rate
1-5%neurological deficit risk

Schwab Classification of Spinal Osteotomies

Grade 1
PatternPartial facet resection (SPO)
Treatment5-10° correction
Grade 2
PatternComplete facet resection
Treatment10-15° correction
Grade 3
PatternPedicle subtraction (PSO)
Treatment30-40° correction
Grade 4
PatternPosterior VCR with cage
Treatment40-60° correction
Grade 5
PatternComplete VCR
Treatment60-90° correction
Grade 6
PatternMultiple VCR
TreatmentGreater than 90° correction

Critical Must-Knows

  • PSO (Grade 3) achieves 30-40° correction at single level through posterior closing wedge
  • VCR (Grade 4-5) allows multiplanar correction for severe rigid deformities
  • Neuromonitoring mandatory - wake-up test if signal changes occur
  • Blood loss can exceed 2000mL - cell saver and preoperative autologous donation essential
  • Biomechanical hinge is anterior column - protect at all costs during PSO

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    PSO apex is at posterior cortex - cutting too anterior risks anterior column failure
  • "
    VCR requires anterior AND posterior support with mesh cage and rod construct
  • "
    Schwab Grade 3 (PSO) is most common three-column osteotomy for sagittal imbalance
  • "
    Complication rate higher with VCR (30%) versus PSO (20%) but greater correction achieved

Critical Three-Column Osteotomy Exam Points

Biomechanical Principles

PSO closes posteriorly, hinges anteriorly. Anterior column is tension band - must remain intact. Greenstick fracture of anterior cortex allows controlled closure. Breaking anterior column risks catastrophic failure requiring anterior reconstruction.

Neurological Risk Stratification

Highest risk: VCR at thoracic levels (1-10% deficit). Cord ischemia from canal compromise or vascular injury. PSO safer (1-2% risk) but still requires SSEP/MEP monitoring. Immediate wake-up test if signal loss.

Bleeding Complications

Expect 1500-3000mL blood loss. Epidural venous plexus bleeding during posterior decompression. Cell saver mandatory. Tranexamic acid reduces loss by 30%. Type and cross 4-6 units preoperatively.

Deformity Assessment

Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) drives indication. SVA greater than 5cm indicates sagittal imbalance. Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch greater than 10° requires correction. PSO at L2-L3 most effective for global sagittal balance.

At a Glance

Three-column osteotomies are powerful spinal deformity correction techniques classified by the Schwab system (Grades 1-6). Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO, Grade 3) achieves 30-40° correction per level by creating a posterior closing wedge that hinges on the intact anterior column—this tension band must be preserved to avoid catastrophic failure. Vertebral column resection (VCR, Grade 4-6) enables 60-90° multiplanar correction for severe rigid deformities. Complication rates are significant (PSO 20%, VCR 30%) with neurological deficit risk of 1-5%; neuromonitoring (SSEP/MEP) is mandatory with immediate wake-up test if signals change. Blood loss typically exceeds 2000mL requiring cell saver and tranexamic acid.

Mnemonic

PRECISEPSO Steps - Safe Execution

P
Pedicle exposure
Expose bilateral pedicles and transverse processes
R
Resect pedicles
Remove pedicles with high-speed burr
E
Eggshell posterior cortex
Thin posterior vertebral wall leaving shell
C
Canal decompression
Remove posterior wall and decompress dural sac
I
Intact anterior cortex
Preserve anterior column as hinge
S
Secure closure
Rod placement and controlled wedge closure
E
Examine neuromonitoring
Confirm SSEP/MEP signals maintained throughout

Memory Hook:Execute PSO with PRECISION - every step critical to avoid catastrophic anterior column failure or neurological injury!

Mnemonic

SHARPVCR Indications

S
Severe rigid deformity
Deformity greater than 70° that cannot be corrected with PSO
H
Hemivertebra resection
Congenital hemivertebra causing coronal or sagittal imbalance
A
Angular kyphosis
Sharp angular deformity requiring multiplanar correction
R
Revision scenario
Failed prior fusion with junctional kyphosis
P
Primary tumor resection
En bloc vertebral resection for spinal tumors

Memory Hook:SHARP deformities need SHARP corrections - VCR cuts through all three columns for maximum flexibility!

Mnemonic

BLEEDSComplications of Three-Column Osteotomies

B
Blood loss massive
1500-3000mL typical, cell saver mandatory
L
Leg weakness (neurological)
1-5% risk of motor deficit from cord ischemia
E
Epidural hematoma
Postoperative compression requires emergent decompression
E
Equipment failure
Rod fracture, screw pullout, junctional failure
D
Dural tear
10-15% incidence during posterior decompression
S
Spinal instability
Anterior column fracture or pseudarthrosis

Memory Hook:Three-column osteotomies BLEED and carry major risks - prepare patient and surgical team accordingly!

Overview and Epidemiology

Three-column osteotomies represent the most powerful tools for correction of complex spinal deformity. These procedures involve resection of all three spinal columns (anterior, middle, posterior) to achieve significant sagittal and coronal plane realignment. The two main types are pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO, Schwab Grade 3) and vertebral column resection (VCR, Schwab Grade 4-6).

Why Three-Column Osteotomies Matter

Adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance causes progressive disability and pain. Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) greater than 5cm and PI-LL mismatch greater than 10° predict poor quality of life. Three-column osteotomies restore sagittal balance when less invasive procedures cannot achieve adequate correction. PSO is the workhorse for fixed sagittal deformity, while VCR is reserved for the most severe rigid curves or tumor resection.

Indications for PSO

  • Fixed sagittal imbalance with SVA greater than 5cm
  • Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch greater than 10°
  • Ankylosing spondylitis with severe kyphosis
  • Post-traumatic kyphosis
  • Flatback syndrome after prior fusion

Indications for VCR

  • Severe rigid deformity greater than 70° unresponsive to PSO
  • Congenital hemivertebra
  • Sharp angular kyphosis requiring multiplanar correction
  • Spinal tumor requiring en bloc resection
  • Revision with junctional kyphosis

Pathophysiology

Anterior Column Preservation in PSO

The anterior longitudinal ligament and anterior vertebral cortex form the biomechanical hinge during PSO closure. Greenstick fracture of the anterior cortex allows controlled closure of the posterior wedge. Complete fracture through the anterior column creates instability requiring anterior column reconstruction with cage support. Fluoroscopic monitoring during closure is mandatory to detect anterior column failure.

Three Spinal Columns: Anatomy and Resection Strategy

ColumnAnatomical StructuresResection in PSOResection in VCR
AnteriorAnterior longitudinal ligament, anterior vertebral body, anterior annulusPRESERVED as hinge (greenstick fracture)Complete resection, replaced with mesh cage
MiddlePosterior vertebral body, posterior annulus, posterior longitudinal ligamentComplete resection within wedgeComplete resection
PosteriorPedicles, facets, lamina, ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligamentsComplete bilateral resectionComplete resection

Vascular Anatomy at Risk

Lumbar Vessels (L1-L4)

Segmental arteries arise from aorta at posterior vertebral body. At risk during anterior cortex perforation or VCR. Injury causes massive hemorrhage. Preoperative CT angiography identifies aberrant vasculature. Vascular surgery on standby for VCR cases.

Epidural Venous Plexus

Valveless venous network within spinal canal. Major source of bleeding during decompression. Hemostasis with bipolar cautery, thrombin-soaked Gelfoam, and bone wax on bleeding bone surfaces. Cell saver recovers 30-50% of blood loss.

Classification

Schwab Spinal Osteotomy Classification

Schwab Classification (Anatomical)

GradeOsteotomy TypeColumns InvolvedExpected Correction
Grade 1Partial facet resection (SPO)Posterior only5-10°
Grade 2Complete facet resection (Ponte)Posterior only10-15°
Grade 3Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO)All three30-40°
Grade 4Posterior VCR with cageAll three40-60°
Grade 5Complete VCR (anterior + posterior)All three60-90°
Grade 6Multiple VCRAll three at multiple levelsGreater than 90°

Clinical Application

When to Use Each Grade:

Grades 1-2 (Smith-Petersen/Ponte):

  • Mobile deformities
  • Ankylosing spondylitis with flexible segments
  • Multiple levels can achieve cumulative correction

Grade 3 (PSO):

  • Fixed sagittal imbalance
  • Ankylosing spondylitis with rigid kyphosis
  • Flatback syndrome
  • Single level provides 30-40° correction

Grades 4-6 (VCR):

  • Severe rigid deformity greater than 70°
  • Congenital hemivertebra
  • Sharp angular kyphosis
  • Spinal tumor requiring en bloc resection

PSO is the Workhorse

Schwab Grade 3 (PSO) is the most commonly performed three-column osteotomy. It provides reliable 30-40° sagittal correction with acceptable complication rates. VCR (Grades 4-6) reserved for cases where PSO cannot achieve adequate correction.

Clinical Presentation

Preoperative Workup

Week -6 to -4Radiographic Assessment

Standing scoliosis radiographs (36-inch cassette) to measure global sagittal and coronal alignment. Measure Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), and PI-LL mismatch. CT spine for bone quality assessment and pedicle anatomy. MRI if neurological symptoms or to rule out stenosis.

Week -4 to -2Medical Optimization

Cardiopulmonary clearance for patients over 60 years or with comorbidities. Autologous blood donation (2-4 units) if time permits. Nutritional optimization - albumin greater than 3.5g/dL. Smoking cessation mandatory for fusion. Osteoporosis treatment if DEXA T-score less than -2.5.

Week -2 to -1Surgical Planning

Determine osteotomy level - L2 or L3 most effective for global sagittal balance correction. Calculate correction needed - each PSO provides 30-40° lordosis. Plan instrumentation - extend 3-4 levels above and below osteotomy. Arrange neuromonitoring and wake-up test protocol.

PSO versus VCR: Decision Matrix

ParameterPSO (Schwab Grade 3)VCR (Schwab Grade 4-5)
Correction achieved30-40° sagittal60-90° multiplanar
Operative time4-6 hours6-10 hours
Blood loss1500-2000mL2000-4000mL
Neurological risk1-2%5-10%
ApproachPosterior onlyAnterior and posterior or posterior only
IndicationFixed sagittal imbalanceSevere rigid deformity, tumor, hemivertebra

Investigations and Surgical Planning

Patient Positioning

Position: Prone on radiolucent Jackson table or OSI frame Padding: All bony prominences, avoid abdominal compression (improves venous drainage) Arms: Tucked at sides or on arm boards at less than 90° abduction Neuromonitoring: SSEP and MEP electrodes placed before positioning C-arm: Position for AP and lateral lumbar imaging

Positioning Critical Points

Avoid abdominal compression to minimize epidural venous engorgement and bleeding. Ensure chest rolls or frame allow abdomen to hang free. Hip flexion reduces lumbar lordosis making posterior decompression easier. Confirm neuromonitoring baseline signals before prepping.

Exposure

Incision: Midline from upper instrumented vertebra to lower instrumented vertebra Dissection: Subperiosteal exposure of posterior elements from lamina to tips of transverse processes Levels: Expose 3-4 levels above and 3-4 levels below planned osteotomy Landmarks: Identify osteotomy level with intraoperative fluoroscopy Instrumentation: Place pedicle screws at all levels except osteotomy level (screws placed after PSO closure)

Subperiosteal dissection protects paraspinal muscles and minimizes bleeding. Use bipolar cautery liberally for hemostasis.

Step-by-Step PSO Technique

Posterior Column Resection

Step 1Laminectomy

Complete laminectomy at osteotomy level and one level above. Remove spinous process, lamina, and inferior facets of level above. Remove superior facets of osteotomy level. Creates wide posterior exposure of dural sac.

Step 2Pedicle Resection

Bilateral pedicle resection using high-speed burr. Identify medial pedicle wall (lateral border of canal). Remove pedicle from lateral to medial, thinning medial wall last. Protect dural sac and exiting nerve roots. Complete pedicle removal creates lateral gutters.

Step 3Posterior Cortex Thinning

Eggshell posterior vertebral body cortex with burr or rongeur. Thin posterior wall to depth of anterior cortex but leave thin shell. Remove bone from lateral gutters toward midline. Create V-shaped wedge with apex at posterior cortex and base at anterior cortex.

Step 4Canal Decompression

Remove posterior vertebral wall and decompress dural sac circumferentially. Free dura from adhesions. Identify and protect exiting nerve roots in foramina. Ensure complete mobility of dural sac before closure to prevent tethering during correction.

PSO Apex Location

The apex of the PSO wedge is at the posterior cortex of the vertebral body, NOT at the canal. Cutting too anteriorly (toward the anterior column) risks breaking the anterior cortex and losing the biomechanical hinge. The wedge base is at the anterior cortex which must remain intact.

Middle and Anterior Column Management

Goal: Preserve anterior cortex and ALL as biomechanical hinge Technique: Do NOT penetrate anterior cortex with burr or curette Wedge size: Calculate required wedge based on desired correction (30-40° typical) Confirmation: Fluoroscopy confirms posterior cortex resection but anterior cortex intact

Anterior column greenstick fracture occurs during closure, allowing controlled hinge motion. Complete anterior fracture requires cage placement and converts PSO to modified VCR.

PSO Closure Technique

Controlled Closure Steps

Step 1Rod Preparation

Pre-contoured rods with lordotic bend matching desired correction. Rod length spans from upper to lower instrumented vertebra. Place rods into proximal and distal screws but NOT through osteotomy gap initially.

Step 2Gradual Closure

Temporary rod shorteners or compression devices applied to rods. Slow compression (1-2mm every few minutes) to close posterior wedge. Monitor neuromonitoring continuously during closure. Stop if SSEP/MEP signal loss - perform wake-up test immediately.

Step 3Osteotomy Screw Placement

After partial closure, place pedicle screws at osteotomy level through residual pedicle bone or vertebral body. Capture screws with rods. Final compression to complete closure with screws locked to rods.

Step 4Final Fixation

Lock all set screws. Apply compression across osteotomy site. Fluoroscopy confirms correction and anterior column continuity (no anterior column fracture). Final neuromonitoring confirms intact signals. Decortication and bone graft at osteotomy site and all instrumented levels.

Neurological Monitoring During Closure

SSEP and MEP monitoring is continuous during closure. If signal loss occurs, STOP closure immediately. Obtain wake-up test to assess motor function. If patient cannot move legs, open osteotomy and release compression. Consider anterior column failure with canal compromise or vascular injury causing cord ischemia.

Avoiding Anterior Column Fracture

Signs of anterior failure: Sudden loss of closure resistance, audible crack, fluoroscopy shows anterior column discontinuity Management: STOP closure, place interbody cage anteriorly (may require anterior approach or lateral transpsoas approach), convert to modified VCR construct Prevention: Gradual closure, maintain anterior cortex thickness, avoid osteoporotic bone

Anterior column fracture increases pseudarthrosis risk and may require revision surgery.

Wound Closure

Hemostasis: Meticulous hemostasis with bipolar cautery, thrombin-soaked Gelfoam, and bone wax Drain: Large closed suction drain (19Fr or larger) in epidural space, exiting through separate stab incision Fascial closure: #1 absorbable braided suture in interrupted or running fashion Subcutaneous: 2-0 absorbable suture in layers Skin: Staples or running subcuticular suture Dressing: Sterile dressing with ABD pads to absorb expected drainage

Blood Loss Management

Expect 1500-2500mL blood loss for PSO. Cell saver recovers 30-50% of shed blood. Tranexamic acid (1g bolus followed by 1g over 8 hours) reduces blood loss by 30%. Type and cross 4-6 units preoperatively. Consider autologous donation weeks before surgery.

Drain removal when output less than 30mL over 8 hours, typically postoperative day 2-3.

Management: Vertebral Column Resection (VCR)

Vertebral Column Resection Principles

Definition: Complete resection of vertebral body, pedicles, and posterior elements (all three columns) at one or more levels

Schwab Grades:

  • Grade 4: Posterior VCR with posterior cage support
  • Grade 5: Complete VCR with anterior and posterior support
  • Grade 6: Multiple VCR

Correction: 60-90° multiplanar correction possible with VCR

VCR Technique Options

ApproachIndicationAdvantagesDisadvantages
Posterior-only VCRSagittal and coronal deformitySingle approach, shorter operative timeMore difficult anterior reconstruction
Anterior-posterior VCRSevere rigid deformity, tumorOptimal anterior column reconstructionTwo approaches, longer operative time, higher morbidity
Posterior with transpsoas VCRLumbar deformityAccess to anterior column laterallyLearning curve, lumbar plexus risk

VCR provides maximum correction but carries higher risk than PSO. Reserved for most severe deformities.

Posterior-Only VCR Steps

VCR Resection

Step 1Posterior Instrumentation

Temporary rods placed 3-4 levels above and below VCR level for stability. Pedicle screws at all levels except VCR level. Temporary stabilization prevents collapse during resection.

Step 2Posterior Column Resection

Complete laminectomy and bilateral pedicle resection at VCR level. Remove one level above and below to provide working space. Decompress dural sac and mobilize nerve roots.

Step 3Vertebral Body Resection

Transpedicular approach to vertebral body. High-speed burr or rongeur removes vertebral body from within pedicle tracts. Preserve anterior longitudinal ligament initially for stability. Curettage removes all disc and vertebral body.

Step 4Anterior Column Reconstruction

Mesh cage filled with bone graft placed anteriorly through posterior approach. Size cage to fit between vertebral bodies above and below. Position cage anterior to dura, resting on anterior cortex of vertebrae above and below.

Step 5Final Correction and Fixation

Remove temporary rods. Place permanent contoured rods with lordotic or kyphotic correction as needed. Compression or distraction to close osteotomy and seat cage. Lock all screws. Confirm correction with fluoroscopy.

Great Vessel Injury Risk

Anterior perforation during vertebral body resection can injure aorta (left side) or vena cava (right side). Work from lateral to medial. Use blunt instruments near anterior cortex. Have vascular surgery immediately available. If major vessel injury suspected, pack wound, stabilize patient, and obtain vascular control.

Posterior-only VCR requires advanced skill and should only be performed by experienced deformity surgeons.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Neurological deficit1-5%Thoracic level, cord ischemia, canal compromise during closureImmediate wake-up test, open osteotomy if deficit confirmed, MRI to rule out hematoma
Massive hemorrhage10-20%VCR, epidural plexus injury, segmental vessel injuryCell saver, transfusion protocol, vascular surgery consultation if uncontrolled
Anterior column fracture5-10% of PSOOsteoporosis, excessive closure force, thin anterior cortexAnterior column reconstruction with cage, convert to VCR construct
Dural tear10-15%Extensive decompression, adhesions, revision surgeryPrimary repair, fibrin glue, lumbar drain if large tear, bed rest 48 hours
Infection2-8%Prolonged operative time, blood loss, diabetes, obesityAntibiotics, irrigation and debridement, hardware retention if stable
Pseudarthrosis10-20%Smoking, osteoporosis, anterior column fracture, infectionRevision fusion, bone graft, anterior column support if deficient
Proximal junctional kyphosis20-30%Osteoporosis, abrupt transition, inadequate proximal fixationExtend fusion proximally, prophylactic vertebroplasty at UIV, tethering

Immediate Postoperative Neurological Deficit

Postoperative neurological deficit requires emergent assessment. Obtain wake-up test in OR before emergence. If deficit present, obtain stat MRI to rule out epidural hematoma. If hematoma present, emergent decompression. If no hematoma, consider cord ischemia or intraoperative injury - supportive care and high-dose steroids (controversial). Document deficit and serial neurological exams.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Postoperative Protocol

Immediate PostoperativeDay 0-1 (ICU)

ICU monitoring for first 24-48 hours. Hourly neurological checks for lower extremity motor and sensory function. Hemodynamic monitoring and transfusion as needed for anemia or hemodynamic instability. Drain output monitored, expect 200-500mL first 24 hours. Pain control with PCA narcotics and muscle relaxants.

Early MobilizationDays 2-5 (Floor)

Out of bed to chair on postoperative day 1 or 2 with brace. Physical therapy for ambulation with walker. TLSO brace for 3 months when out of bed. Drain removal when output less than 30mL per 8 hours. DVT prophylaxis with sequential compression devices and pharmacological prophylaxis.

Home RecoveryWeeks 2-6

Brace wear whenever out of bed. No bending, lifting, or twisting (BLT precautions). Gradual increase in ambulation distance. Wound check at 2 weeks, staples removed if healing well. Pain management transition from narcotics to non-narcotics.

Progressive ActivityWeeks 6-12

Standing X-rays at 6 weeks to assess alignment and hardware position. Brace weaning if early fusion signs present. Physical therapy for core strengthening and flexibility. Return to sedentary work possible at 8-12 weeks.

Long-term RecoveryMonths 3-12

Radiographs at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess fusion. Full activity after solid fusion confirmed, typically 9-12 months. Monitor for complications including proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, and hardware failure.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Patient-Reported Outcomes

Pain and function: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improves by 15-20 points on average after PSO for sagittal imbalance. Patients with severe preoperative disability benefit most. Pain scores (VAS) decrease from 7-8/10 to 3-4/10 on average.

Quality of life: SF-36 and SRS-22 scores improve significantly in physical function domains. Mental health scores less reliably improved. Patient satisfaction 70-80% at 2 years.

Radiographic correction: PSO achieves 30-40° sagittal correction and SVA improvement from 10-15cm to less than 5cm. VCR achieves 60-90° multiplanar correction. Correction maintained in 80-90% of patients without junctional failure.

Outcomes by Osteotomy Type

Outcome MeasurePSOVCR
Sagittal correction30-40° per level60-90° per level
Fusion rate at 1 year85-90%75-85%
Major complication rate15-20%25-35%
Neurological deficit1-2%5-10%
Reoperation rate at 2 years10-15%15-25%

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Factors associated with worse outcomes include: smoking (doubles pseudarthrosis risk), osteoporosis (T-score less than -2.5), obesity (BMI greater than 35), diabetes, age over 70 years, proximal junctional kyphosis at upper instrumented vertebra, inadequate sagittal correction (residual SVA greater than 5cm), and anterior column fracture during PSO closure requiring conversion to VCR.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

PSO for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction

3
Bridwell et al • Spine (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 77 patients undergoing PSO for fixed sagittal imbalance
  • Mean correction 31° sagittal plane, SVA improved from 12cm to 3cm
  • Complications in 37%: 11% neurological (all temporary except 1), 13% pseudarthrosis
  • Significant improvement in pain and function scores at 2-year follow-up
Clinical Implication: PSO is effective for sagittal imbalance correction but carries significant complication risk. Patient selection and surgical technique critical to outcomes.
Limitation: Retrospective single-center study with heterogeneous patient population and varied instrumentation techniques.

Comparison of PSO versus VCR for Deformity Correction

3
Lenke et al • JBJS Am (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective comparison of 35 PSO versus 28 VCR for severe spinal deformity
  • VCR achieved greater correction (48° vs 35°) but higher complication rate (39% vs 23%)
  • Neurological complications higher with VCR (11% vs 3%)
  • Blood loss greater with VCR (2400mL vs 1800mL)
Clinical Implication: VCR provides greater correction for severe rigid deformities but at cost of increased morbidity. Reserve VCR for cases where PSO cannot achieve adequate correction.
Limitation: Retrospective comparison with selection bias - VCR cases were more severe deformities at baseline.

Tranexamic Acid Reduces Blood Loss in Spinal Deformity Surgery

2
Elwatidy et al • Spine (2008)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of 40 patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery randomized to tranexamic acid vs placebo
  • Tranexamic acid reduced intraoperative blood loss by 35% (1200mL vs 1850mL)
  • Transfusion requirements reduced (2.1 units vs 3.4 units)
  • No difference in thromboembolic complications between groups
Clinical Implication: Tranexamic acid is safe and effective for reducing blood loss in spinal deformity surgery. Recommend 1g bolus followed by 1g infusion over 8 hours.
Limitation: Small sample size and older study, but findings corroborated by subsequent meta-analyses.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Ankylosing Spondylitis with Fixed Kyphosis (Standard)

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old man with ankylosing spondylitis presents with severe thoracolumbar kyphosis. He cannot look horizontally and has chronic back pain. Standing radiographs show 60° thoracolumbar kyphosis, chin-brow vertical angle of 30°, and SVA of 18cm. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a patient with ankylosing spondylitis and severe fixed sagittal imbalance requiring surgical correction. I would take a systematic approach: First, obtain complete history including functional limitations, pain severity, and medical comorbidities. Ankylosing spondylitis patients are at risk for osteoporosis and fractures. Second, perform thorough physical examination including neurological assessment and cardiac/pulmonary function (restrictive lung disease common with AS). Third, obtain standing 36-inch scoliosis radiographs to measure SVA, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and chin-brow vertical angle. Also obtain CT for bone quality and MRI if neurological symptoms. Based on SVA of 18cm and inability to achieve horizontal gaze, this patient requires pedicle subtraction osteotomy. I would recommend PSO at L2 or L3 level to restore sagittal balance. Expected correction is 30-40° which should reduce SVA to less than 5cm and improve chin-brow angle. Counsel patient about risks including neurological deficit (1-2%), massive blood loss requiring transfusion, infection, and pseudarthrosis. Preoperative optimization includes smoking cessation, osteoporosis treatment if present, and cardiopulmonary clearance.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize sagittal imbalance severity - SVA 18cm is severe and disabling
PSO provides 30-40° correction per level, sufficient for this deformity
L2 or L3 optimal level for global sagittal balance restoration
Ankylosing spondylitis patients need osteoporosis screening and treatment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending multiple Smith-Petersen osteotomies - insufficient for fused spine
✗Missing need for preoperative cardiac/pulmonary clearance in AS patients
✗Not counseling about significant blood loss and transfusion requirements
✗Attempting PSO without neuromonitoring capability
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What level would you choose for the PSO and why?"
"How much blood loss do you expect and how will you prepare?"
"What would you do if you lose neuromonitoring signals during closure?"
"How do you prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in this patient?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: PSO Technique and Anterior Column Management (Challenging)

EXAMINER

"You are performing a PSO at L3 for sagittal imbalance. You have completed the posterior column resection and are beginning to close the osteotomy. During closure, you hear a loud crack and feel sudden loss of resistance. Fluoroscopy shows discontinuity of the anterior vertebral cortex. What has happened and how do you manage it?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an anterior column fracture during PSO closure - a recognized complication occurring in 5-10% of cases. The biomechanical hinge has been lost and the construct is now unstable. Immediate management: First, STOP closure and remove compression forces. Second, assess neuromonitoring - if signals lost, obtain wake-up test immediately to assess motor function. If patient has new deficit, decompress canal and assess for bone fragments or hematoma causing compression. Third, assess anterior column on fluoroscopy - complete fracture versus greenstick. If complete fracture, I need to provide anterior column support. Options include: placing interbody cage through posterior approach at L3 (between L2 and L4 vertebral bodies), or performing lateral transpsoas approach to place cage anteriorly, or converting to formal VCR with mesh cage. I would attempt posterior placement of interbody cage through the PSO defect. Size cage appropriately (typically 12-14mm height), fill with bone graft, and position anterior to dura resting on L2 and L4 endplates. Then resume controlled closure with cage providing anterior support. Lock instrumentation and obtain final fluoroscopy confirming cage position and overall alignment. Prevention of anterior column fracture involves: gradual closure over several minutes, maintaining adequate anterior cortex thickness during resection, avoiding osteoporotic bone, and using neuromonitoring to detect early cord compression.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize anterior column fracture immediately and STOP closure
Check neuromonitoring and perform wake-up test if signals lost
Provide anterior column support with interbody cage or convert to VCR
Prevention is key - gradual closure and adequate anterior cortex preservation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Continuing closure despite anterior fracture - risks catastrophic instability
✗Not checking neuromonitoring after sudden loss of resistance
✗Failing to provide anterior column support - will lead to pseudarthrosis
✗Panic response instead of systematic problem-solving approach
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you place an interbody cage through the posterior PSO approach?"
"What if you cannot safely place a cage posteriorly?"
"How does this complication affect fusion rate and outcomes?"
"What would you tell the patient and family postoperatively?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Postoperative Neurological Deficit Management (Critical)

EXAMINER

"Postoperative day 0 after L2 PSO for sagittal imbalance. Patient underwent 6-hour procedure with 2500mL estimated blood loss, transfused 4 units PRBCs. In PACU, patient is somnolent but arousable. When you perform neurological exam, patient has 0/5 bilateral lower extremity motor function and sensory level at L1. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was stable throughout case. How do you assess and manage?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a postoperative neurological deficit after PSO which is a surgical emergency. Differential diagnosis includes: epidural hematoma causing cord compression, anterior column fracture with canal compromise, cord ischemia from vascular injury or hypotension, or unrecognized intraoperative injury. Immediate management: First, perform complete neurological exam to confirm deficit and localize level. Check blood pressure and ensure MAP greater than 85mmHg to maintain cord perfusion. Second, obtain STAT MRI of entire spine to evaluate for epidural hematoma or canal compromise. If MRI not immediately available, obtain CT myelogram. Third, while obtaining imaging, send stat coagulation studies, CBC, and reverse any coagulopathy. Prepare OR for emergent decompression if hematoma found. Fourth, if MRI shows large epidural hematoma, take patient emergently to OR for hematoma evacuation and canal decompression. If MRI shows canal compromise from bone or hardware malposition, revise instrumentation and decompress. If MRI shows no compressive lesion, diagnosis is likely cord ischemia or intraoperative injury. Management is supportive care, maintain MAP greater than 85mmHg for cord perfusion, high-dose steroids (controversial), and serial neurological exams. Document deficit thoroughly and family conference to explain situation. Prognosis for cord ischemia is guarded with variable recovery. Prevention strategies include: meticulous intraoperative hemostasis, gradual PSO closure with continuous neuromonitoring, avoiding hypotension, and wake-up test in OR if any signal changes.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Epidural hematoma must be ruled out emergently with MRI
Maintain MAP greater than 85mmHg for cord perfusion
Emergent decompression if compressive lesion identified
Document deficit thoroughly and communicate clearly with family
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying imaging to 'see if it gets better' - hematoma requires emergent decompression
✗Attributing deficit to anesthesia without thorough neurological exam and imaging
✗Not maintaining adequate MAP for cord perfusion in early postoperative period
✗Failing to communicate clearly with patient and family about severity
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the timeframe for hematoma evacuation to have chance of recovery?"
"How would you differentiate cord ischemia from hematoma clinically?"
"What is the role of high-dose steroids in acute spinal cord injury?"
"If deficit is permanent, how do you approach the family discussion?"

MCQ Practice Points

PSO Correction Question

Q: What is the expected sagittal plane correction achieved with a single-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO)? A: 30-40° - A single-level PSO typically provides 30-40° of sagittal plane correction. This is achieved through posterior column closing wedge with anterior column acting as hinge. Multiple PSOs (e.g., two-level) can achieve 60-80° correction but with increased morbidity.

Schwab Classification Question

Q: In the Schwab classification of spinal osteotomies, what defines a Grade 3 osteotomy? A: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) - Schwab Grade 3 is defined as pedicle and partial vertebral body resection (pedicle subtraction osteotomy). Grade 1-2 are posterior column only. Grades 4-6 involve vertebral column resection with increasing complexity.

Anterior Column Biomechanics Question

Q: What structure serves as the biomechanical hinge during PSO closure? A: Anterior longitudinal ligament and anterior vertebral cortex - The anterior column must remain intact during PSO to serve as hinge. Greenstick fracture allows controlled closure. Complete anterior column fracture requires cage placement and converts procedure to modified VCR.

Complication Rate Question

Q: What is the approximate major complication rate for PSO versus VCR? A: PSO 15-20%, VCR 25-35% - Major complications include neurological deficit, massive hemorrhage, infection, and pseudarthrosis. VCR has higher complication rate due to more extensive resection and greater destabilization during procedure.

Optimal Level Question

Q: What is the optimal level for PSO to correct global sagittal imbalance in adult spinal deformity? A: L2 or L3 - PSO at L2 or L3 provides maximum correction of sagittal vertical axis (SVA). More proximal osteotomies correct regional kyphosis but less effective for global SVA. L4 or L5 PSO increases risk of L5 nerve root injury.

Blood Loss Question

Q: What is the expected blood loss for PSO and what strategies reduce bleeding? A: 1500-2500mL for PSO - Strategies to reduce blood loss include: tranexamic acid (1g bolus + 1g infusion reduces loss by 30%), cell saver autotransfusion, preoperative autologous donation, meticulous hemostasis with bipolar cautery, avoiding abdominal compression to reduce epidural venous engorgement, and hypotensive anesthesia (controversial).

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Guidelines

RACS Surgical Competence: Three-column osteotomies are advanced spine procedures requiring fellowship training in spinal deformity surgery. Not within scope of general orthopaedic practice. These procedures should only be performed at centres with appropriate multidisciplinary support including neuromonitoring, ICU capacity, and blood banking services.

Australian Registry Data

AOA National Joint Replacement Registry: Does not cover spinal procedures. No national spine registry in Australia currently.

State-based outcome tracking: Some centers participate in international spine deformity databases (e.g., SRS Morbidity and Mortality database) to track outcomes and complications.

Medicolegal Considerations for Three-Column Osteotomies

Informed consent must include:

  • Neurological deficit risk (1-5% depending on procedure) with possibility of permanent paralysis
  • Massive blood loss and transfusion requirements (multiple units likely)
  • Infection risk (2-8%) with potential need for hardware removal
  • Pseudarthrosis (10-20%) requiring revision surgery
  • Proximal junctional kyphosis (20-30%) may require extension of fusion
  • Medical complications: DVT/PE, cardiac events, prolonged recovery (3-6 months)
  • Alternative treatments discussed including continued conservative management

Documentation requirements:

  • Preoperative radiographic measurements (SVA, PI-LL mismatch) justifying surgery
  • Medical optimization completed (smoking cessation, osteoporosis treatment, cardiac clearance)
  • Neuromonitoring records with any signal changes documented and managed
  • Operative report detailing osteotomy level, extent of resection, closure technique, any complications
  • Postoperative neurological exam documented immediately in PACU and daily thereafter

Common litigation issues:

  • Unrecognized neurological deficit in immediate postoperative period - ensure hourly neuro checks
  • Inadequate informed consent regarding paralysis risk - document discussion of worst-case scenarios
  • Anterior column fracture not recognized or inadequately managed - fluoroscopy before final closure mandatory
  • Pseudarthrosis from inadequate fusion technique - ensure adequate bone graft and biologics used

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Three Column Osteotomies
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Three Column OsteotomiesCredit: OrthoVellum

THREE-COLUMN OSTEOTOMIES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy and Biomechanics

  • •Three columns: Anterior (ALL + anterior VB), Middle (posterior VB + PLL), Posterior (pedicles + facets + lamina)
  • •PSO hinge = anterior column (ALL + anterior cortex) - MUST preserve for stability
  • •Greenstick anterior cortex fracture allows controlled closure - complete fracture requires cage
  • •Epidural venous plexus is major bleeding source - valveless system drains to IVC

Classification and Correction

  • •Schwab Grade 3 = PSO = 30-40° correction per level (posterior only)
  • •Schwab Grade 4-5 = VCR = 60-90° correction (all three columns resected)
  • •L2 or L3 optimal level for PSO to correct global sagittal imbalance
  • •SVA greater than 5cm and PI-LL mismatch greater than 10° indicate need for three-column osteotomy

Surgical Technique Pearls

  • •PSO apex at posterior cortex - cutting too far anterior risks anterior column fracture
  • •Gradual closure over several minutes prevents sudden anterior column failure
  • •SSEP/MEP monitoring mandatory - wake-up test if signals lost during closure
  • •VCR requires temporary rod stabilization before vertebral body resection to prevent collapse
  • •Mesh cage with bone graft provides anterior column support in VCR

Major Complications

  • •Neurological deficit 1-5% (higher with VCR and thoracic levels) - cord ischemia or compression
  • •Massive hemorrhage 1500-3000mL - epidural plexus and segmental vessels at risk
  • •Anterior column fracture 5-10% of PSO - requires cage placement or conversion to VCR
  • •Pseudarthrosis 10-20% - smoking, osteoporosis, anterior fracture are risk factors
  • •Proximal junctional kyphosis 20-30% - extend fusion if UIV osteoporotic

Management Algorithms

  • •Ankylosing spondylitis with kyphosis greater than 60° → PSO at L2/L3 for correction
  • •Severe rigid deformity greater than 70° unresponsive to PSO → VCR for maximum correction
  • •Anterior column fracture during closure → STOP, check neuromonitoring, place cage, convert to VCR construct
  • •Postoperative neurological deficit → STAT MRI, evacuate hematoma if present emergently (within 6 hours)

Key Evidence and Outcomes

  • •Bridwell 2003: PSO achieves 31° correction, SVA improves from 12cm to 3cm, but 37% complication rate
  • •Lenke 2009: VCR achieves 48° vs PSO 35° but higher complications (39% vs 23%)
  • •Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss by 30% (Elwatidy 2008 RCT)
  • •Fusion rate 85-90% at 1 year for PSO, 75-85% for VCR
  • •Patient satisfaction 70-80% at 2 years despite high complication rates
Quick Stats
Reading Time106 min
Related Topics

Atlantoaxial Arthritis

Baastrup Disease (Kissing Spine Syndrome)

Bertolotti Syndrome (Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra)

Cervical Facet Arthropathy