Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Comprehensive guide to ulnar impaction syndrome including positive ulnar variance, TFCC tears, ulnar shortening osteotomy, and wafer procedures.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

ULNAR IMPACTION SYNDROME

Ulnocarpal Abutment | TFCC Degenerative Tears | Positive Ulnar Variance

2mm+Positive ulnar variance
85-90%USO success rate
Palmer 2CMost common TFCC tear
3-6 monthsConservative trial

Palmer Classification (Degenerative)

2A
PatternTFCC wear, no perforation
TreatmentConservative, consider debridement
2B
PatternTFCC wear + lunate/ulnar chondromalacia
TreatmentUlnar shortening or wafer
2C
PatternTFCC perforation + chondromalacia
TreatmentUlnar shortening osteotomy
2D
Pattern2C + LT ligament tear
TreatmentUSO + LT repair/reconstruction
2E
Pattern2D + ulnocarpal arthritis
TreatmentUlnar head arthroplasty or Darrach

Critical Must-Knows

  • Positive Ulnar Variance: Ulna over 2mm longer than radius = increased ulnocarpal loading
  • TFCC Central Tear: Palmer 2C most common - degenerative perforation from chronic impaction
  • Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy (USO): Gold standard - shortens ulna 2-4mm to unload ulnocarpal joint
  • Wafer Procedure: Arthroscopic distal ulna resection - for positive variance less than 2-3mm
  • Palmer 2E: End-stage with arthritis - requires salvage (Darrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, ulnar head replacement)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Positive ulnar variance = ulna longer = increased ulnocarpal impaction
  • "
    USO decreases ulnocarpal load by 50% per mm of shortening
  • "
    Wafer only for variance under 3mm - USO for greater variance
  • "
    DRUJ stability must be preserved with any ulnar procedure

Critical Ulnar Impaction Exam Points

Ulnar Variance is Key

Positive ulnar variance is the fundamental pathology. Ulna over 2mm longer than radius increases ulnocarpal loading. Measure on PA wrist X-ray with forearm in neutral rotation, shoulder at 90 degrees abduction, elbow at 90 degrees flexion.

Palmer 2C Most Common

Degenerative TFCC tear from chronic impaction. Palmer 2C (TFCC perforation + chondromalacia) requires ulnar shortening. Do not confuse with Palmer 1B traumatic peripheral tears (which are repairable).

USO vs Wafer Decision

Ulnar shortening for variance over 2-3mm. Wafer procedure (arthroscopic distal ulna resection) only for mild positive variance under 2-3mm. USO is more powerful but requires 3-4 months healing.

Preserve DRUJ Stability

DRUJ must remain stable. Excessive ulnar shortening (over 4mm) or Darrach in young patient causes instability. Check DRUJ stability intraoperatively with forearm rotation.

Quick Decision Guide

Palmer StageVarianceTreatmentKey Pearl
2A-2BMild positiveConservative 3-6 months, NSAIDs, splintMany respond to activity modification
2C2-3mm positiveUSO or wafer procedureWafer faster recovery but less powerful
2C-2DOver 3mm positiveUlnar shortening osteotomyGold standard, 85-90% success
2EAny variance + arthritisDarrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, or ulnar head replacementSalvage procedures for end-stage
Mnemonic

ABCDEPalmer Classification Class 2 (Degenerative)

A
Attritional wear
TFCC thinning, no perforation
B
B = Bone changes
Lunate or ulnar head chondromalacia
C
Central perforation
TFCC central tear + chondromalacia
D
D = Disrupted LT ligament
2C + lunotriquetral tear
E
End-stage arthritis
Ulnocarpal arthrosis

Memory Hook:ABCDE = alphabetical progression from early wear to end-stage arthritis in ulnar impaction!

Mnemonic

PUDIClinical Features of Ulnar Impaction

P
Pain (ulnar-sided)
Dorsal ulnar wrist pain
U
Ulnar deviation worsens
Pain with ulnar deviation and grip
D
DRUJ tenderness
Tender over ulnocarpal joint
I
Impaction test positive
Axial load + ulnar deviation reproduces pain

Memory Hook:PUDI = Pain with Ulnar Deviation and Impaction - the classic presentation!

Mnemonic

WAFER-DSurgical Options for UIS

W
Wafer procedure
Arthroscopic distal ulna resection 2-3mm
A
Arthroscopic debridement
TFCC debridement alone (Palmer 2A)
F
Formal ulnar shortening
USO - osteotomy and plate fixation
E
End-stage options
Darrach or Sauvé-Kapandji
R
Replacement
Ulnar head arthroplasty
D
Distal ulna hemiresection
Bowers procedure (rare)

Memory Hook:WAFER-D = the spectrum of surgical treatments from arthroscopic to salvage!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why UIS Matters

Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Understanding the relationship between ulnar variance, TFCC degenerative tears, and treatment options is essential for hand surgery practice.

Ulnar Impaction Syndrome is a degenerative condition resulting from excessive load transmission between the distal ulna and ulnar carpus (lunate and triquetrum).

Demographics

  • Age: 40-60 years (degenerative process)
  • Gender: Equal distribution
  • Occupation: Manual laborers, overhead workers
  • Bilateral: Common (50% have bilateral variance)

Chronic overload leads to progressive degeneration.

Risk Factors

  • Positive ulnar variance (constitutional or acquired)
  • Radial shortening after distal radius fracture malunion
  • Radial head excision (shifts load ulnarly)
  • Essex-Lopresti injury (proximal radius migration)
  • Repetitive pronation-supination activities

Any process increasing ulnar variance predisposes to UIS.

Pathophysiology and Biomechanics

Ulnocarpal Loading Mechanics

In a neutral wrist with neutral ulnar variance, approximately 60% of axial load transmits through the radius and 40% through the ulna (TFCC). With positive ulnar variance of 2.5mm, ulnocarpal load increases to over 60%. This excessive loading causes TFCC degeneration and chondromalacia.

Biomechanical Cascade:

  1. Positive ulnar variance (constitutional or acquired)
  2. Increased ulnocarpal loading (especially lunate-triquetrum)
  3. TFCC central wear and perforation (Palmer 2C)
  4. Lunate and ulnar head chondromalacia (Palmer 2B-2C)
  5. Lunotriquetral ligament tear (Palmer 2D)
  6. Ulnocarpal arthritis (Palmer 2E - end-stage)

Ulnar Variance Measurement:

  • PA wrist X-ray
  • Forearm neutral rotation (key - pronation increases variance)
  • Shoulder abducted 90 degrees, elbow flexed 90 degrees
  • Perpendicular line from ulnar articular surface to radial articular surface
  • Positive variance: ulna extends distal to radius
  • Negative variance: ulna proximal to radius

Why Positive Variance Matters

Every 1mm of positive ulnar variance increases ulnocarpal load. Studies show 2.5mm positive variance increases TFCC load by over 40%. This explains why shortening 2-4mm dramatically relieves symptoms.

Biomechanical correction is the goal of surgery.

Dynamic Variance

Forearm rotation affects variance. Pronation increases positive variance by 1-2mm. Supination decreases it. Always measure in neutral rotation for accuracy. Grip force also increases dynamic loading.

Symptoms worse with pronation and grip.

Classification Systems

Palmer Classification Class 2 (Degenerative TFCC Tears)

Degenerative tears from chronic ulnar impaction, distinct from Class 1 traumatic tears.

TypeTFCC StatusAssociated PathologyTreatment
2AAttritional thinningNo perforation, minimal chondromalaciaConservative, debridement
2BThinning + chondromalaciaLunate or ulnar head cartilage damageUSO or wafer
2CCentral perforationTFCC tear + chondromalaciaUSO (gold standard)
2D2C + LT tearLunotriquetral ligament disruptionUSO + LT repair
2E2D + arthritisUlnocarpal arthrosisDarrach, SK, or replacement

Palmer 2C is most common presentation requiring surgical intervention.

Classification guides treatment algorithm based on pathology stage.

Ulnar Variance Categories

VarianceMeasurementPrevalenceImpaction Risk
NegativeUlna shorter than radius15-25%Low (may develop Kienböck's)
NeutralEven with radius (0 ± 1mm)60-70%Normal
PositiveUlna 1-2mm longer10-15%Mild risk
Significant positiveUlna over 2mm longer5-10%High UIS risk

Threshold for symptoms: Usually over 2mm positive variance required for UIS.

Variance measurement guides treatment planning.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain: Dorsal-ulnar wrist pain
  • Worse with: Ulnar deviation, grip, pronation
  • Better with: Rest, avoiding provocative activities
  • Clicking: Occasional with forearm rotation
  • Weakness: Grip strength reduced
  • Occupation: Manual work, repetitive pronation

Insidious onset over months to years is typical.

Examination

  • Inspection: Minimal swelling usually
  • Palpation: Tender over ulnocarpal joint (just distal to ulnar styloid)
  • ROM: Normal or slightly reduced
  • Provocative tests: Ulnar impaction test, TFCC load test
  • Strength: Grip weakness (pain-limited)
  • DRUJ: Assess stability (piano key sign)

Ulnar-sided tenderness is hallmark finding.

Provocative Tests

TestTechniquePositive FindingSensitivity
Ulnar impaction testAxial load + ulnar deviation + pronationReproduces ulnar pain70-80%
TFCC load testForearm pronation-supination with ulnar deviationPain over TFCC60-70%
Press testPush up from chair using handsUlnar-sided pain50-60%

Differential Diagnosis

Consider: TFCC peripheral (traumatic) tear, lunotriquetral ligament tear, ECU tendinitis, ulnar styloid impaction, pisotriquetral arthritis, DRUJ arthritis. Imaging differentiates.

Investigations

Investigation Protocol

First LinePlain Radiographs

PA and lateral wrist X-rays. Measure ulnar variance on PA view (neutral rotation critical). Look for: lunate or ulnar head sclerosis, cystic changes, ulnocarpal joint narrowing. Clenched-fist view may increase variance and demonstrate pathology.

Gold StandardMRI Wrist

T1, T2, and proton density sequences. Detects TFCC central tear, lunate chondromalacia, bone marrow edema, LT ligament status. MR arthrogram increases sensitivity for TFCC tears but usually not necessary.

AlternativeWrist Arthroscopy

Diagnostic and therapeutic gold standard. Directly visualizes TFCC tear, chondromalacia extent, and allows treatment (debridement, wafer). Radiocarpal and midcarpal portals assess all pathology.

Key Radiographic Findings:

  • Positive ulnar variance (over 2mm)
  • Lunate sclerosis (increased density on PA view)
  • Ulnar head cysts (subchondral cystic changes)
  • Ulnocarpal joint narrowing (end-stage Palmer 2E)

MRI Findings:

  • TFCC central perforation (high signal on T2)
  • Lunate bone marrow edema (low T1, high T2 signal)
  • Chondromalacia (cartilage thinning or defects)
  • LT ligament tear (discontinuity or high signal)

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
ulnar impaction syndrome management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for ulnar impaction syndromeCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management

Indications: Palmer 2A, mild symptoms, patient prefers non-operative trial

Conservative Treatment Steps

First LineActivity Modification

Avoid provocative activities. Reduce repetitive pronation, grip, and ulnar deviation. Ergonomic workplace modifications. Trial 3-6 months.

AdjunctsSplinting

Forearm-based splint. Immobilize wrist in neutral position. Wear during activities and at night. May decrease symptoms 30-50%.

MedicalNSAIDs and Injection

NSAIDs for inflammation. Corticosteroid injection into ulnocarpal joint may provide temporary relief (weeks to months). Limited injections (maximum 2-3).

Outcomes: 30-40% improve with conservative management. Palmer 2C and beyond usually require surgery.

Conservative treatment is reasonable initial approach for early disease.

Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy (USO)

Indications: Palmer 2C-2D, positive ulnar variance over 2-3mm, failed conservative management

Gold standard surgical treatment for UIS.

USO Procedure

PlanningPre-operative Measurement

Measure exact ulnar variance. Plan shortening 2-4mm to achieve neutral or 1mm negative variance. Over-shortening risks DRUJ instability.

TechniqueOsteotomy and Fixation

Mid-diaphyseal or metaphyseal osteotomy. Transverse or oblique cut. Remove measured bone segment. Compress and fix with plate (6-8 screws, 3-4 each side). Ensure rigid fixation.

CheckVerify DRUJ Stability

Intraoperative DRUJ stability check. Forearm rotation should be smooth without instability. If unstable, excessive shortening - revise.

Techniques:

  • Transverse osteotomy: Perpendicular cut, easier but delayed union
  • Oblique osteotomy: Angled cut, larger surface area for faster healing
  • Step-cut osteotomy: Most stable but technically harder

Outcomes: 85-90% good-excellent pain relief and functional improvement.

Complications:

  • Nonunion (5-10%) - most common
  • Hardware prominence/irritation (10-15%)
  • DRUJ stiffness (5%)
  • Nerve injury (dorsal sensory branch of ulnar nerve)

USO is powerful but requires 3-4 months healing and therapy.

Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure

Indications: Palmer 2B-2C with mild positive variance (under 2-3mm), patient wants faster recovery

Arthroscopic resection of 2-3mm distal ulnar dome.

Wafer Steps

1Arthroscopy Setup

Radiocarpal arthroscopy. 3-4 and 6R portals. Visualize TFCC central tear and chondromalacia.

2TFCC Debridement

Debride degenerative TFCC flap. Shaver and radiofrequency probe. Create stable rim. Do not debride peripheral TFCC (vascular, stabilizing).

3Wafer Resection

Burr 2-3mm from distal ulnar dome. Arthroscopic burr through radiocarpal joint. Smooth contour. Verify decompression with probe.

Advantages:

  • Faster recovery (2-3 months vs 4-6 for USO)
  • No hardware, no nonunion risk
  • Outpatient procedure

Disadvantages:

  • Limited amount of shortening possible (max 2-3mm)
  • Less powerful than USO
  • Cannot address LT tears or severe pathology

Outcomes: 70-80% good results for appropriate indications.

Wafer is effective for mild UIS but USO preferred for significant variance.

Salvage Procedures for Palmer 2E

Indications: Ulnocarpal arthritis, failed USO/wafer, end-stage disease

Darrach Procedure

  • Technique: Excise distal 1-2cm of ulna
  • Indication: Low-demand, elderly patients
  • Advantage: Reliably relieves pain
  • Disadvantage: DRUJ instability (especially supination), ulnar stump pain, convergence
  • Avoid in: Young, high-demand patients

Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure

  • Technique: Fuse DRUJ, create pseudarthrosis proximal in ulna
  • Indication: Young patients needing stability
  • Advantage: Maintains DRUJ stability, good rotation
  • Disadvantage: Proximal stump instability, technically demanding
  • Outcomes: Good pain relief with preserved function

Ulnar Head Replacement

  • Technique: Implant arthroplasty replacing ulnar head
  • Indication: DRUJ arthritis, failed Darrach
  • Advantage: Preserves stability and rotation
  • Disadvantage: Implant wear, loosening, cost
  • Outcomes: Good short-medium term, long-term unknown

Salvage selection depends on age, activity, and DRUJ status.

Surgical Technique

Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy - Step by Step

Operative Steps

1Positioning and Approach

Supine, arm table, tourniquet. Direct lateral or dorsal approach to mid-distal ulna. 8-10cm incision. Identify and protect dorsal sensory branch of ulnar nerve.

2Exposure

Elevate ECU and FCU from ulna. Subperiosteal dissection. Expose 6-8cm of ulnar shaft. Protect interosseous membrane.

3Osteotomy

Mark osteotomy site (mid-diaphyseal or metaphyseal). Measure and mark bone to remove (2-4mm based on pre-op plan). Transverse or oblique osteotomy with saw. Remove segment. Compress osteotomy.

4Plate Fixation

Apply 6-8 hole compression plate. 3-4 screws each side of osteotomy. Ensure rigid fixation with interfragmentary compression. Locking or non-locking plate acceptable.

5DRUJ Check and Closure

Release tourniquet. Check DRUJ stability with forearm rotation. Should be smooth and stable. Close in layers, splint in neutral.

Technical Pearls:

  • Pre-op planning: measure exact variance and plan amount
  • Mark bone segment before cutting to ensure accuracy
  • Maximum compression at osteotomy site (decreases nonunion)
  • Low-profile plate to minimize prominence
  • Check DRUJ - if unstable, shortening is excessive

Pitfalls:

  • Inadequate shortening - fails to relieve symptoms
  • Excessive shortening (over 4mm) - DRUJ instability
  • Nerve injury - protect dorsal sensory branch
  • Nonunion - ensure compression and rigid fixation

USO requires meticulous technique for optimal results.

Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure

Arthroscopic Steps

1Arthroscopy Setup

Wrist arthroscopy tower, traction 10-15 lbs. 3-4 portal (radiocarpal). Systematic inspection: radiocarpal joint, TFCC, lunate, scaphoid.

2TFCC Assessment

Probe TFCC central region. Identify degenerative perforation and unstable flaps. Grade Palmer classification arthroscopically.

3TFCC Debridement

Shaver to debride degenerative tissue. Create stable rim. Preserve peripheral 1-2mm (vascular, stabilizing). Radiofrequency probe for hemostasis.

4Ulnar Dome Resection

Insert arthroscopic burr through radiocarpal joint. Burr 2-3mm from distal ulnar dome (articular surface). Smooth contour. Use probe to verify adequate decompression and space created.

5Final Check

Visualize decompression. Ensure smooth ulnar surface. Hemostasis. Close portals, soft dressing.

Technical Pearls:

  • Preserve peripheral TFCC - do not over-resect
  • Smooth ulnar dome contour to prevent catching
  • 2-3mm max resection - more causes instability
  • Adequate visualization critical

Wafer is technically demanding arthroscopic procedure.

Complications

Complications by Treatment

TreatmentEarly ComplicationsLate ComplicationsManagement
USOInfection, nerve injury (dorsal sensory)Nonunion (5-10%), hardware prominenceORIF with bone graft, hardware removal
WaferPortal site infection, synovitisRecurrent impaction (if inadequate resection)Revision to USO
DarrachHematoma, nerve injuryDRUJ instability, convergence, ulnar stump painRevision to SK or ulnar head replacement

Common Complications

Nonunion after USO (5-10%):

  • Risk factors: smoking, diabetes, inadequate fixation
  • Management: ORIF with bone graft, compression plating
  • Prevention: rigid fixation, compression, smoking cessation

DRUJ Instability:

  • Caused by excessive ulnar shortening (over 4mm)
  • Worse in supination (dorsal subluxation)
  • Management: splinting if mild; SK procedure if severe

Persistent Pain after USO:

  • Hardware prominence (most common) - remove plate after union
  • Inadequate shortening - consider revision
  • Unrecognized pathology (LT tear, arthritis) - MRI, arthroscopy

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

USO: Weeks 0-2Immobilization Phase

Sugar-tong splint or cast. Protect osteotomy. Finger and shoulder ROM. No forearm rotation. Wound check 10-14 days.

USO: Weeks 2-6Protected Mobilization

Transition to removable splint. Begin gentle wrist ROM at week 3-4. No strengthening. X-ray at 6 weeks to assess union.

USO: Weeks 6-12Strengthening

Progressive strengthening if union progressing. Therapy for ROM and grip. Full activities by 3-4 months if healed.

Wafer: Weeks 0-2Early Motion

Soft dressing, removable splint. Finger ROM immediately. Begin wrist ROM at 1-2 weeks. Much faster than USO.

Wafer: Weeks 2-6Return to Function

Progressive strengthening. Return to normal activities by 6-8 weeks. No hardware to heal.

Return to Work:

  • Desk work: 2-3 weeks (wafer), 4-6 weeks (USO)
  • Light manual: 6-8 weeks (wafer), 10-12 weeks (USO)
  • Heavy labor: 12 weeks (wafer), 16 weeks (USO)

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes by Treatment

TreatmentPain ReliefFunction PreservationDurability
Conservative30-40% improvementMaintainedTemporary, often progresses
USO85-90% good-excellentGrip 85-90% normalDurable 10+ years
Wafer70-80% goodGrip 80-85% normalGood 5-7 years
Darrach80-90% pain reliefInstability issuesVariable

Prognostic Factors:

FactorBetter OutcomeWorse Outcome
Palmer stage2B-2C2E (arthritis)
Variance amount2-4mm (correctable)Over 6mm
AgeUnder 60Over 65
ComplianceGood therapy adherenceNon-compliant

Long-term Natural History (Untreated):

  • Progression from Palmer 2A to 2E over 5-15 years
  • Most symptomatic patients eventually require surgery
  • Conservative management temporizing only

Evidence Base

Cohort Study
📚 Baek et al
Key Findings:
  • Ulnar shortening osteotomy for UIS
  • 88% good-excellent outcomes at 2 years
  • Nonunion rate 6%
  • Grip strength 90% of contralateral
Clinical Implication: USO is highly effective for symptomatic UIS with positive ulnar variance.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2005

Original Description
📚 Feldon et al
Key Findings:
  • Described arthroscopic wafer procedure
  • 2-4mm ulnar dome resection
  • Good results in limited positive variance
  • Faster recovery than USO
Clinical Implication: Wafer procedure is effective alternative for mild UIS (variance under 3mm).
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1992

Comparative Study
📚 Tomaino et al
Key Findings:
  • USO vs wafer for UIS
  • USO more powerful for variance over 3mm
  • Wafer faster recovery but less durable
  • Similar outcomes for variance under 2mm
Clinical Implication: Select wafer for mild variance, USO for significant positive variance.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2001

Classification Study
📚 Palmer
Key Findings:
  • Palmer classification of TFCC tears
  • Class 1 traumatic, Class 2 degenerative
  • 2C most common requiring surgery
  • Guides treatment algorithm
Clinical Implication: Palmer classification is gold standard for TFCC tear categorization.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1989

Biomechanical Study
📚 Nishiwaki et al
Key Findings:
  • Ulnar variance and ulnocarpal load correlation
  • 2.5mm positive variance increases TFCC load 42%
  • Each 1mm shortening decreases load significantly
  • Explains clinical efficacy of USO
Clinical Implication: Biomechanical rationale supports ulnar shortening for load reduction.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2005

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classic UIS Presentation

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old carpenter presents with 12 months of ulnar-sided wrist pain, worse with gripping and pronation. X-rays show 3mm positive ulnar variance with mild lunate sclerosis. MRI shows Palmer 2C TFCC central tear and lunate chondromalacia. Conservative management with splint has failed over 3 months."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is ulnar impaction syndrome with Palmer 2C pathology - TFCC central degenerative tear with chondromalacia from chronic impaction. The key findings are 3mm positive ulnar variance (excessive ulnocarpal loading) and failure of conservative treatment. Given the significant positive variance and Palmer 2C tear, I would recommend ulnar shortening osteotomy as the gold standard treatment. USO involves mid-diaphyseal or metaphyseal osteotomy with removal of 2-4mm bone segment (in this case targeting 3-4mm to achieve neutral variance), rigid plate fixation with compression. This decreases ulnocarpal loading by approximately 50% per millimeter shortened. I would counsel about 85-90% success rate for pain relief and functional improvement. Risks include nonunion (5-10%, most common complication), hardware prominence, DRUJ stiffness, and nerve injury. Recovery is 3-4 months to full activities. Alternative would be arthroscopic wafer, but less effective for 3mm variance.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Palmer 2C = central TFCC tear from chronic impaction
3mm positive variance = significant, warrants USO over wafer
USO gold standard for variance over 2-3mm
85-90% success rate, nonunion most common complication
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending wafer for 3mm variance - insufficient shortening
✗Not measuring exact variance or planning shortening amount
✗Missing that positive variance is the fundamental pathology
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform ulnar shortening osteotomy?"
"What is the difference between USO and wafer procedure?"
"How does ulnar variance affect ulnocarpal loading?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Choosing Between USO and Wafer

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old woman has ulnar-sided wrist pain with 1.5mm positive ulnar variance. MRI shows Palmer 2B-2C tear. She is active and wants fastest return to work. What do you recommend?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has mild positive ulnar variance (1.5mm) with Palmer 2B-2C pathology. The decision is between ulnar shortening osteotomy and arthroscopic wafer procedure. Given the mild variance under 2mm and her desire for rapid return to function, I would recommend arthroscopic wafer procedure. This involves radiocarpal arthroscopy with debridement of the degenerative TFCC central tear and burring 2-3mm from the distal ulnar dome. Wafer provides 70-80% good outcomes for variance under 2-3mm, with much faster recovery - return to work in 6-8 weeks versus 12-16 weeks for USO. The trade-off is that wafer is less powerful and potentially less durable long-term than USO. However, if wafer fails, USO remains an option. I would counsel about risks of portal infection, inadequate decompression requiring revision, and need to preserve peripheral TFCC during debridement. If she were a manual laborer with over 3mm variance, I would recommend USO as more definitive despite longer recovery.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Variance under 2mm = wafer is reasonable option
Wafer faster recovery (6-8 weeks vs 12-16 weeks)
USO more powerful but longer recovery and nonunion risk
Failed wafer can still proceed to USO if needed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Always choosing USO - wafer has role for mild variance
✗Not counseling about trade-offs (recovery vs power)
✗Over-resecting peripheral TFCC during wafer
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform arthroscopic wafer procedure?"
"What if variance was 4mm instead?"
"What are contraindications to wafer?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Failed USO Management

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 6 months after USO with persistent ulnar pain. X-rays show the osteotomy has healed, and variance is now neutral. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Persistent pain after ulnar shortening osteotomy with confirmed union and appropriate correction requires systematic evaluation. I would take detailed history: Is pain same or different from pre-operative? Worse with what activities? Then examine for: hardware prominence (most common cause of persistent pain after healed USO), DRUJ stability and tenderness, ulnar nerve symptoms. My differential includes: prominent hardware irritation, unrecognized pathology at time of surgery (such as LT ligament tear not addressed, or ulnocarpal arthritis progressing to Palmer 2E), DRUJ arthritis, or complex regional pain syndrome. I would obtain repeat MRI to assess for LT tear, residual TFCC pathology, chondromalacia progression, or DRUJ changes. If hardware prominence is confirmed, I would offer removal after 12-18 months when bone remodeling complete. If unrecognized LT tear or advanced arthritis, may require wrist arthroscopy for debridement/LT repair, or salvage with Darrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, or ulnar head replacement depending on findings.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Persistent pain despite healing = hardware or unrecognized pathology
Hardware prominence most common - remove after remodeling
LT tear may be missed at initial surgery
Repeat MRI or arthroscopy to identify cause
Salvage options if arthritis has progressed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming all persistent pain is hardware - must investigate fully
✗Removing hardware too early (before remodeling)
✗Not recognizing progression to Palmer 2E requiring salvage
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are salvage options for end-stage ulnocarpal arthritis?"
"When would you perform Darrach vs Sauvé-Kapandji?"
"What is ulnar head arthroplasty?"

MCQ Practice Points

Ulnar Variance Threshold

Q: What amount of positive ulnar variance typically causes ulnar impaction syndrome? A: Over 2mm positive ulnar variance significantly increases ulnocarpal loading and predisposes to UIS. Normal population: 60-70% neutral variance, 10-15% positive variance (usually under 2mm).

Palmer 2C Definition

Q: What defines Palmer 2C TFCC tear? A: Central TFCC perforation (degenerative tear) PLUS chondromalacia of lunate or ulnar head. Most common stage requiring surgical intervention.

USO vs Wafer Indication

Q: What is the variance threshold for choosing USO over wafer procedure? A: Over 2-3mm positive variance warrants USO. Wafer procedure can only address 2-3mm maximum shortening; greater variance requires formal ulnar shortening osteotomy.

USO Success Rate

Q: What is the success rate of ulnar shortening osteotomy for UIS? A: 85-90% good to excellent outcomes for pain relief and functional improvement. Nonunion rate 5-10% (most common complication).

Biomechanics of Load Reduction

Q: How does ulnar shortening decrease ulnocarpal loading? A: Each 1mm of shortening decreases ulnocarpal load by approximately 50%. With 2.5mm positive variance, ulnocarpal load is increased by over 40%; shortening to neutral redistributes load through radius.

Salvage for Palmer 2E

Q: What are salvage options for Palmer 2E (ulnocarpal arthritis)? A: Darrach procedure (distal ulna excision), Sauvé-Kapandji (DRUJ fusion with proximal pseudarthrosis), or ulnar head arthroplasty. Selection based on age and activity level.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia: Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain in Australia, particularly in manual laborers in construction, agriculture, and mining industries. Positive ulnar variance prevalence in the general population is approximately 10-15%, with symptomatic UIS developing in a subset of this group. Hand surgeons encounter UIS regularly in practice, making familiarity with diagnosis and treatment algorithms essential.

Management Considerations: Australian hand surgeons typically follow the Palmer classification for TFCC tears and stage-appropriate treatment. MRI is readily accessible and used routinely for diagnosis confirmation and surgical planning. Ulnar shortening osteotomy is the preferred surgical treatment for Palmer 2C-2D pathology with significant positive variance (over 2-3mm), while arthroscopic wafer procedures are increasingly used for mild variance. Conservative management is appropriate for Palmer 2A-2B disease with trial of activity modification, splinting, and corticosteroid injection before proceeding to surgery. Salvage procedures (Darrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, ulnar head replacement) are reserved for end-stage ulnocarpal arthritis after failed USO or primary Palmer 2E disease.

Medicolegal Considerations: Informed consent for ulnar shortening osteotomy should address nonunion risk (5-10%), hardware prominence requiring removal, DRUJ stiffness, and 3-4 month recovery timeline. Pre-operative measurement and documentation of exact ulnar variance is essential for surgical planning and medicolegal protection. Post-operative follow-up should include serial X-rays to monitor healing and detect nonunion early. Consider workers compensation implications for patients in manual occupations, particularly those involving vibration exposure or repetitive forearm rotation. Smoking cessation counseling is important to reduce nonunion risk.

ULNAR IMPACTION SYNDROME

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Pathophysiology

  • •Positive ulnar variance = ulna longer than radius by over 2mm
  • •Excessive ulnocarpal loading causes TFCC degeneration
  • •Each 1mm positive variance increases TFCC load significantly
  • •Biomechanical problem requiring mechanical solution

Palmer Classification (Class 2)

  • •2A: TFCC wear, no perforation
  • •2B: Wear + chondromalacia
  • •2C: Central perforation + chondromalacia (most common surgical)
  • •2D: 2C + LT tear
  • •2E: 2D + ulnocarpal arthritis (end-stage)

Clinical Diagnosis

  • •Ulnar-sided wrist pain, worse with pronation and grip
  • •Ulnar impaction test: axial load + ulnar deviation reproduces pain
  • •X-ray: measure ulnar variance (PA view, neutral rotation)
  • •MRI: TFCC tear, chondromalacia, bone marrow edema

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Conservative: activity modification, splint, injection (30-40% success)
  • •Wafer: arthroscopic resection for variance under 2-3mm (70-80% success)
  • •USO: gold standard for variance over 2-3mm (85-90% success)
  • •Salvage: Darrach, SK, or ulnar head replacement for 2E

USO Technique

  • •Shorten ulna 2-4mm to neutral or 1mm negative variance
  • •Rigid plate fixation with compression (prevent nonunion)
  • •Check DRUJ stability intraoperatively
  • •Recovery 3-4 months, nonunion risk 5-10%
Quick Stats
Reading Time85 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand