Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Comprehensive guide to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion including indications, surgical technique, complications, and outcomes for Orthopaedic examination

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

ACDF - ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION

Smith-Robinson Approach | Disc Excision | Interbody Fusion | Plate Fixation

95%Fusion rate (single level)
2-5%Dysphagia (persistent)
0.2-1%RLN injury rate
C5-6Most common level

INDICATIONS BY PATHOLOGY

Radiculopathy
PatternArm pain from nerve root compression
TreatmentACDF at affected level(s)
Myelopathy
PatternCord compression with long tract signs
TreatmentACDF or corpectomy
Disc herniation
PatternSoft disc protrusion
TreatmentDiscectomy +/- fusion
Spondylosis
PatternHard disc, osteophyte complex
TreatmentACDF with decompression

Critical Must-Knows

  • Smith-Robinson approach is standard anterior cervical exposure
  • Longus colli dissection protects vertebral artery and sympathetic chain
  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve is at risk on right side (loops around subclavian)
  • Dysphagia is commonest complication (transient in most)
  • Anterior plate increases fusion rate especially in multilevel

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Left-sided approach preferred to avoid RLN (loops around aorta - longer protected course)
  • "
    Esophagus lies behind trachea - retract together medially
  • "
    Vertebral artery lies in transverse foramen from C6 upward
  • "
    Superior laryngeal nerve at risk with retraction above C3

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Lateral cervical X-ray showing combined 3-level ACDF with cage/plate anteriorly and posterior C2-C7 pedicle screw instrumentation - complex deformity correction case.
Click to expand
Lateral cervical X-ray showing combined 3-level ACDF with cage/plate anteriorly and posterior C2-C7 pedicle screw instrumentation - complex deformity Credit: Rahimizadeh A et al. - Case Rep Orthop via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4808527 (CC-BY 4.0)
3-panel (A-C) lateral cervical X-ray series showing ACDF complications: immediate post-op (A), 12-month follow-up showing adjacent segment degeneration with superior osteophyte (B), and subsidence wit
Click to expand
3-panel (A-C) lateral cervical X-ray series showing ACDF complications: immediate post-op (A), 12-month follow-up showing adjacent segment degeneratioCredit: Park SB et al. - J Korean Neurosurg Soc via Open-i (NIH) - PMC3921277 (CC-BY 4.0)

Clinical Imaging

Post-Operative ACDF Radiographs

Lateral cervical X-ray showing combined ACDF and posterior instrumentation
Click to expand
Lateral cervical X-ray demonstrating combined anterior-posterior cervical fusion: Three-level ACDF with interbody cages and anterior plate, combined with posterior C2-C7 pedicle screw instrumentation. This combined construct is used for complex cervical deformity correction or severe instability cases where anterior fusion alone is insufficient.Credit: Rahimizadeh et al., Case Rep Orthop 2016 - CC-BY 4.0

ACDF Complications: Adjacent Segment Disease and Subsidence

Serial lateral cervical X-rays showing ACDF complications
Click to expand
ACDF complications demonstrated on serial lateral cervical X-rays: (A) Immediate post-operative showing single-level ACDF with interbody cage, (B) 12-month follow-up showing adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) with superior osteophyte formation, (C) Further follow-up demonstrating cage subsidence with loss of disc height. ASD occurs at 2.5-4% per year following ACDF.Credit: Park et al., J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013 - CC-BY 4.0

Critical ACDF Exam Points

Approach Side Matters

Left-sided approach preferred as recurrent laryngeal nerve has longer protected course around aortic arch. On the right side, RLN loops around subclavian artery and is more variable and vulnerable. Some surgeons prefer right for better angle to right-sided pathology.

Key Anatomy

The longus colli muscles must be dissected to expose disc space and protect vertebral artery laterally. Carotid sheath (carotid, IJV, vagus) retracted laterally. Esophagus and trachea retracted medially.

Dysphagia Prevention

Dysphagia is the most common complication (50% transient, 2-5% persistent). Minimize with: deflating endotracheal cuff during retraction, limiting retraction pressure, shorter surgical time, and avoiding high retractor blade placement.

Fusion Considerations

Anterior plate increases fusion rates especially in multilevel surgery. Cage height should restore disc height and lordosis but avoid over-distraction. Bone graft options include autograft, allograft, or cage with bone substitute.

ACDF At a Glance

ParameterDetailsClinical Relevance
Common indicationsRadiculopathy, myelopathy, disc herniationFailed conservative treatment or progressive neuro deficit
Most common levelC5-6 (60%), C6-7 (30%)Correlates with degenerative disease pattern
Approach sideLeft preferred (RLN protection)Right may be used for right-sided pathology
Fusion rate95% single level, 85% two levelPlate increases rate in multilevel
Adjacent segment disease2.5-4% per yearSimilar to lumbar spine
Common complicationsDysphagia (most common), hoarseness, hematomaMost transient, rare but serious permanent
Mnemonic

ACDF - Indications

A
Axial neck pain (with instability)
Must have correlating instability
C
Cord compression (myelopathy)
Long tract signs mandate surgery
D
Disc herniation
Soft disc causing radiculopathy
F
Failed conservative care
6-12 weeks for radiculopathy

Memory Hook:ACDF is indicated for Arm pain, Cord compression, Disc herniation, and Failed conservative care

Mnemonic

SMITH - Approach Layers

S
Skin and platysma
Transverse or longitudinal incision
M
Medial to sternocleidomastoid
Identify SCM border
I
Internal structures (carotid, trachea)
Carotid lateral, trachea/esophagus medial
T
Through pretracheal fascia
Blunt dissection to spine
H
Have longus colli cleared
Expose disc space

Memory Hook:SMITH-Robinson approach layers from superficial to deep

Mnemonic

DANGER - Complications

D
Dysphagia
Most common (50% transient)
A
Airway obstruction
Hematoma - surgical emergency
N
Nerve injury (RLN, SLN)
Hoarseness, aspiration
G
Graft dislodgement
Requires revision
E
Esophageal injury
Rare but catastrophic
R
Recurrent symptoms/ASD
Adjacent segment disease

Memory Hook:DANGER zones in ACDF - watch for these complications

Mnemonic

LEFT Side Approach

L
Longer RLN course
Protected around aortic arch
E
Esophagus deviation
Slight left deviation helps access
F
Fewer RLN injuries
Evidence supports left approach
T
Thoracic duct on left
Risk only below C7 (rarely relevant)

Memory Hook:LEFT side preferred for recurrent laryngeal nerve protection

Overview and Epidemiology

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most commonly performed spinal procedures. First described by Robinson and Smith in 1955, it revolutionized cervical spine surgery by providing anterior access for neural decompression.

Historical development:

  • 1955: Smith and Robinson describe anterior approach with iliac crest graft
  • 1958: Cloward describes cylindrical dowel graft technique
  • 1970s-80s: Introduction of anterior cervical plating
  • 1990s-2000s: Development of cage technology
  • 2000s-present: Total disc replacement as alternative

Indications:

  • Cervical radiculopathy: Failed conservative treatment (6-12 weeks)
  • Cervical myelopathy: Any progressive or significant myelopathy
  • Disc herniation: Symptomatic soft or hard disc
  • Cervical instability: Traumatic or degenerative
  • Tumor/infection: Anterior column pathology

Conservative Treatment Duration

For cervical radiculopathy without myelopathy, 6-12 weeks of conservative treatment is recommended before surgery. Myelopathy with progressive symptoms or significant cord compromise should proceed to surgery without delay.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine:

Superficial structures (anterior to posterior):

  • Skin and platysma muscle
  • Superficial cervical fascia
  • Sternocleidomastoid muscle (lateral landmark)

Deep structures:

  • Carotid sheath (lateral): Contains carotid artery, internal jugular vein, vagus nerve
  • Trachea and esophagus (medial): Retracted together
  • Pretracheal fascia: Dissected to reach spine
  • Longus colli muscles: Cover anterior vertebral bodies

Vertebral Artery

The vertebral artery enters the transverse foramen at C6 (variable, can be C5-C7). During lateral dissection and foraminotomy, stay medial to the uncovertebral joint to avoid vertebral artery injury.

Key neural structures:

  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN):

    • Left: Loops around aortic arch (longer protected course)
    • Right: Loops around subclavian artery (shorter, more vulnerable)
    • Supplies all intrinsic laryngeal muscles except cricothyroid
    • Injury causes hoarseness, aspiration
  • Superior laryngeal nerve (SLN):

    • External branch at risk with retraction above C3
    • Supplies cricothyroid muscle
    • Injury affects voice quality/projection
  • Sympathetic chain:

    • Lies lateral on longus colli
    • Injury causes Horner syndrome

Disc space anatomy:

  • Anterior longitudinal ligament (superficial)
  • Annulus fibrosus
  • Nucleus pulposus
  • Posterior longitudinal ligament
  • Uncovertebral joints (Joints of Luschka) - lateral margin

Classification Systems

When to perform ACDF

IndicationKey FeaturesTiming
RadiculopathyDermatomal arm pain, motor/sensory deficitAfter 6-12 weeks failed conservative
MyelopathyLong tract signs, gait disturbance, hand dysfunctionUrgent - avoid delay
Soft disc herniationAcute or subacute, may be single levelFailed conservative or significant deficit
Spondylotic radiculopathyHard disc, osteophytes, foraminal stenosisFailed conservative treatment
Traumatic instabilityFlexion-distraction, facet dislocationUrgent

Myelopathy with progression or significant cord compression should not be delayed for conservative treatment.

When NOT to perform ACDF

Relative contraindications:

  • Multilevel disease (greater than 3 levels) - consider corpectomy or posterior approach
  • Severe kyphosis - may need posterior fixation
  • Ossification of PLL (OPLL) - higher complication rate anteriorly
  • Previous anterior neck surgery - scar tissue, higher risk

Absolute contraindications:

  • Active anterior cervical infection (retropharyngeal abscess)
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Medical unfitness for surgery

Patient selection is critical for optimal outcomes.

Determining surgical levels

Clinical-radiological correlation:

  • Symptoms must match imaging findings
  • EMG/NCS may help localize in unclear cases
  • Provocative selective nerve root blocks (controversial)

Level frequency:

  • C5-6: 55-65%
  • C6-7: 25-30%
  • C4-5: 5-10%
  • C3-4: Rare

Multilevel considerations:

  • 2-level ACDF has good outcomes
  • 3-level: Consider corpectomy or hybrid
  • 4+ levels: Often better with posterior approach

Careful level selection based on clinical-radiological correlation is essential.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Neck pain (axial)
  • Arm pain (radicular - dermatomal distribution)
  • Numbness/tingling (dermatomal)
  • Weakness (myotomal)
  • Hand clumsiness (myelopathy)
  • Gait disturbance (myelopathy)
  • Bladder/bowel symptoms (severe myelopathy)
  • Duration and progression
  • Response to conservative treatment

Examination:

Cervical Radiculopathy Examination

RootMotorSensoryReflex
C5Deltoid, bicepsLateral armBiceps
C6Wrist extensors, bicepsLateral forearm, thumbBrachioradialis
C7Triceps, wrist flexorsMiddle fingerTriceps
C8Finger flexors, intrinsicsMedial forearm, ring/little fingerNone reliable
T1IntrinsicsMedial armNone reliable

Myelopathy signs:

  • Upper motor neuron signs (hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski)
  • Lhermitte sign (electric shock with neck flexion)
  • Hoffmann sign (thumb/index flexion with middle finger flick)
  • Gait disturbance (broad-based, spastic)
  • Hand dysfunction (grip and release test)
  • Inverted radial reflex

Disc vs Root Relationship

The C5-6 disc compresses the C6 nerve root (exiting above the disc). Similarly, C6-7 disc affects C7 root. The nerve root exits above the pedicle of the same numbered vertebra (unlike lumbar spine where root exits below).

Investigations

Gold standard imaging

Key sequences:

  • T1-weighted: Anatomy, bone marrow changes
  • T2-weighted: Cord signal (myelomalacia), disc pathology
  • Gradient echo (T2*): Metal artifact reduction, better disc visualization

Key findings:

  • Disc herniation (soft disc)
  • Osteophyte complex (hard disc)
  • Cord compression
  • Cord signal change (poor prognostic sign)
  • Foraminal stenosis

MRI should correlate with clinical findings to confirm surgical level(s).

Bone detail assessment

Indications:

  • Bone quality assessment
  • OPLL evaluation
  • Trauma evaluation
  • Preoperative planning for cage/plate sizing

CT myelography:

  • If MRI contraindicated (pacemaker, claustrophobia)
  • Better for foraminal stenosis than MRI sometimes
  • Invasive, requires lumbar puncture

CT provides excellent bone detail for surgical planning.

Baseline and dynamic assessment

Views:

  • AP, lateral, oblique cervical spine
  • Flexion-extension (if instability suspected)

Key findings:

  • Disc space narrowing
  • Osteophytes
  • Foraminal narrowing (obliques)
  • Instability (dynamic views)
  • Alignment (lordosis, kyphosis)

Flexion-extension views can reveal dynamic instability not seen on static imaging.

Electrodiagnostic studies

Indications:

  • Unclear level of pathology
  • Differentiate radiculopathy from peripheral neuropathy
  • Baseline assessment before surgery
  • Suspected brachial plexopathy

Findings:

  • Fibrillations, positive sharp waves in radiculopathy
  • Reduced motor unit recruitment
  • Timing: Changes take 2-3 weeks to develop

EMG/NCS can help localize pathology when clinical-radiological correlation is unclear.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
ACDF surgical decision flowchart
Click to expand
Treatment algorithm for cervical disc disease - from conservative management to surgical interventionCredit: OrthoVellum
Clinical Algorithm— Cervical Disc Disease Management
Loading flowchart...

For radiculopathy without myelopathy

Medications:

  • NSAIDs
  • Oral corticosteroids (short course for acute)
  • Neuropathic pain agents (gabapentin, pregabalin)
  • Muscle relaxants

Physical therapy:

  • Cervical traction (controversial)
  • Strengthening exercises
  • Postural training
  • Activity modification

Injections:

  • Cervical epidural steroid injection
  • Selective nerve root blocks
  • Transforaminal vs interlaminar approach

Expected outcomes:

  • 50-70% improve with conservative treatment
  • Natural history of radiculopathy is generally favorable

Give adequate conservative trial unless progressive deficit or myelopathy.

Choosing the right procedure

ProcedureIndicationsAdvantagesDisadvantages
ACDF1-3 level diseaseDirect decompression, fusionASD risk, loss of motion
Arthroplasty (TDR)Single level, preserved motionMotion preservationCost, not for myelopathy
Corpectomy2+ levels, vertebral body pathologyWide decompressionHigher risk, longer construct
Posterior laminectomyMultilevel, lordotic spineIndirect decompressionInstability if facets removed
LaminoplastyMultilevel myelopathyMotion preserving, indirectNeck pain, axial symptoms

ACDF remains the workhorse for 1-3 level anterior cervical pathology.

Surgical Technique

Smith-Robinson anterior cervical approach

Positioning:

  • Supine with neck in neutral or slight extension
  • Head on gel ring or Mayfield
  • Arms tucked at sides
  • Fluoroscopy to confirm level

Approach Steps

Step 1Incision

Transverse skin crease incision (cosmetic) or longitudinal incision for multilevel. Left side preferred. Incise platysma in line with skin.

Step 2Superficial Dissection

Identify medial border of sternocleidomastoid. Develop plane between carotid sheath laterally and trachea/esophagus medially. Blunt dissection to pretracheal fascia.

Step 3Deep Dissection

Divide pretracheal fascia. Identify anterior spine covered by longus colli. Confirm level with fluoroscopy using needle in disc.

Step 4Longus Colli Dissection

Subperiosteal elevation of longus colli off anterior vertebral bodies. Elevate to expose uncovertebral joints (lateral limit of dissection). Place self-retaining retractor under longus colli.

The longus colli must be elevated carefully to protect the vertebral artery and sympathetic chain laterally.

Disc removal and decompression

Discectomy Steps

Step 1Annulotomy

Make box cut through anterior annulus with scalpel. Remove anterior disc material with pituitary rongeurs and curettes.

Step 2Distraction

Apply Caspar or similar distraction pins to vertebral bodies above and below. Apply distraction to open disc space and tension posterior annulus/PLL.

Step 3Posterior Decompression

Remove remaining disc to posterior annulus. Identify and remove posterior longitudinal ligament if needed. May use high-speed burr for osteophytes.

Step 4Foraminotomy

If foraminal stenosis, remove uncovertebral osteophytes using burr or Kerrison. Stay medial to vertebral artery (in transverse foramen).

Step 5Endplate Preparation

Curette endplates to remove cartilage. Preserve subchondral bone for cage support. May roughen to promote fusion.

Complete posterior decompression is essential for neural relief.

Interbody graft and plate

Graft options:

  • Allograft bone: Structural support, no donor site morbidity
  • Autograft (iliac crest): Gold standard for fusion, donor morbidity
  • PEEK cage with bone graft/substitute: Most commonly used today
  • Titanium cage: Good fusion, better radiographic assessment

Fusion Steps

Step 1Sizing

Trial cage/graft to determine appropriate size. Height should restore disc space height and foraminal patency. Lordotic cage may help restore alignment.

Step 2Graft Insertion

Pack cage with bone graft or substitute. Insert under distraction. Release distraction to seat graft and provide compression.

Step 3Plate Application

Measure plate length (avoid adjacent disc). Fix with unicortical locking screws (typically 14-16mm). Confirm position on fluoroscopy.

Step 4Final Check

Confirm alignment, graft position, screw position on fluoroscopy. Check for any bleeding. Hemostasis before closure.

Anterior plate increases fusion rate, especially in multilevel surgery.

Wound closure and postoperative care

Steps:

  • Hemostasis (bipolar, topical agents)
  • Consider drain (controversial - may reduce hematoma)
  • Release retractor, allow soft tissues to return
  • Layered closure of platysma
  • Skin closure (subcuticular for cosmesis)

Immediate postoperative:

  • Soft collar (optional, 2-6 weeks)
  • Early mobilization
  • Monitor for dysphagia
  • Watch for hematoma (airway emergency)

Close monitoring for first 24-48 hours for hematoma development.

Complications

Frequently encountered issues

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Dysphagia30-50% transient, 2-5% persistentMinimize retraction, deflate ETT cuff, shorter surgery
Hoarseness (RLN injury)2-5% transient, 0.2-1% permanentLeft-sided approach, gentle retraction, protect nerve
Hematoma1-2%Meticulous hemostasis, consider drain
Pseudarthrosis5% single level, 15% multilevelUse plate, cage with bone graft, no smoking
Adjacent segment disease2.5-4% per yearMinimize levels, consider disc replacement

Dysphagia is the most common complication but usually resolves within weeks.

Rare but significant

Airway compromise:

  • Hematoma causing airway obstruction
  • Most within 24-48 hours
  • Surgical emergency - open wound at bedside
  • Intubation may be impossible

Esophageal injury:

  • Very rare (0.02-0.25%)
  • May be delayed presentation
  • Mediastinitis if missed
  • Treatment: NPO, antibiotics, repair or diversion

Vertebral artery injury:

  • Very rare
  • Massive bleeding
  • Control with packing, intervention

Spinal cord injury:

  • Rare with careful technique
  • May occur with OPLL dissection
  • Devastating outcome

These rare complications require immediate recognition and treatment.

Delayed issues

Graft/cage problems:

  • Subsidence
  • Dislodgement (anterior or posterior)
  • Pseudarthrosis

Hardware issues:

  • Screw loosening
  • Screw pullout
  • Plate malposition

Adjacent segment disease:

  • Similar rate to lumbar (2.5-4% per year)
  • May require extension of fusion
  • Disc replacement may reduce (limited evidence)

Persistent symptoms:

  • Wrong level surgery
  • Inadequate decompression
  • Recurrent stenosis

Long-term follow-up identifies late complications requiring intervention.

Postoperative Care

First 24-48 hours

Monitoring:

  • Airway assessment (watch for hematoma)
  • Neurological checks
  • Pain management
  • Dysphagia screening before oral intake

Red flags:

  • Increasing neck swelling
  • Stridor or respiratory distress
  • New neurological deficit

Hematoma protocol:

  • If airway compromise developing
  • Open wound at bedside to decompress
  • May need emergency intubation (can be very difficult)
  • Return to OR for evacuation

First 48 hours critical for hematoma detection.

Recovery Phases

Early RecoveryDays 1-14

Soft diet if dysphagia. Soft collar if prescribed. Activity as tolerated. Wound care.

Progressive ActivityWeeks 2-6

Resume normal diet. Wean collar if used. Light activities. Avoid heavy lifting.

Fusion AssessmentWeeks 6-12

Radiographs to assess fusion. Progressive activity. May begin PT.

Full RecoveryMonths 3-12

Full activity if fusion progressing. Sports and heavy work when solid fusion. Long-term follow-up.

Most patients return to sedentary work within 2-4 weeks.

Outcomes and Prognosis

ACDF Outcomes by Indication

IndicationSuccess RateRecovery TimelineFactors Affecting Outcome
Radiculopathy85-95%Arm pain improves within days/weeksDuration of symptoms, motor deficit
Myelopathy70-80% stabilize/improveMay take 6-12 monthsPreop severity, cord signal change
Disc herniation90-95%Rapid improvement typicalSoft disc better than hard disc

Prognostic factors:

Factors Affecting Outcomes

FactorBetter PrognosisWorse Prognosis
Symptom durationShort (less than 6 months)Prolonged (greater than 2 years)
Pathology typeSoft discHard disc, severe spondylosis
Myelopathy signsMild, recent onsetSevere, long-standing, cord signal change
Number of levelsSingle levelMultiple levels
Patient factorsNon-smoker, no diabetesSmoker, diabetic, workers comp

ACDF has excellent outcomes for radiculopathy; myelopathy outcomes depend on severity and duration.

Evidence Base

ACDF vs Conservative for Radiculopathy

I
📚 Persson et al. Spine 1997; Multiple RCTs
Key Findings:
  • Faster arm pain relief with surgery
  • Similar outcomes at 12 months
  • Surgery indicated for failed conservative or progressive deficit
  • Natural history of radiculopathy is favorable
Clinical Implication: Conservative treatment is reasonable first-line for radiculopathy; surgery for failures or significant/progressive deficits.

ACDF vs Disc Replacement

I
📚 Multiple IDE trials (Prestige, Bryan, ProDisc-C)
Key Findings:
  • Similar clinical outcomes
  • Motion preservation with TDR
  • May reduce adjacent segment disease
  • Not for myelopathy or significant instability
Clinical Implication: Disc replacement is an alternative for single-level radiculopathy in appropriate patients.

Plate vs No Plate

I
📚 Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses
Key Findings:
  • Higher fusion rate with plate
  • More benefit in multilevel cases
  • May increase dysphagia rates
  • Low-profile plates may reduce dysphagia
Clinical Implication: Plate fixation recommended for multilevel ACDF; single-level may be done without plate.

Surgical Timing in Myelopathy

II
📚 Fehlings et al. Spine 2012; AOSpine CSM studies
Key Findings:
  • Better outcomes with earlier surgery
  • Avoid delay beyond 6 months
  • Cord signal change indicates poorer prognosis
  • Progressive myelopathy is urgent
Clinical Implication: Do not delay surgery for cervical myelopathy; earlier intervention produces better outcomes.

Left vs Right Approach

III
📚 Beutler et al. Spine 2001; Multiple retrospective studies
Key Findings:
  • Left-sided approach preferred
  • RLN loops around aorta on left
  • Right-sided RLN more variable
  • Some surgeons prefer right for right-sided pathology
Clinical Implication: Left-sided approach is preferred when either side is technically feasible.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Radiculopathy Management

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old man presents with 8 weeks of right arm pain radiating to the thumb with numbness. He has weakness of wrist extension. MRI shows a C5-6 disc herniation compressing the C6 nerve root."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is consistent with C6 radiculopathy from a C5-6 disc herniation. The dermatomal distribution to the thumb, weakness of wrist extension (C6 innervated), and MRI findings all correlate. At 8 weeks of symptoms, I would first ensure he has had an adequate trial of conservative treatment including NSAIDs, possibly a short course of oral steroids, physical therapy, and activity modification. If not, I would recommend continuing conservative care for 6-12 weeks total as the natural history of radiculopathy is generally favorable. However, if conservative treatment fails or if there is progressive motor weakness, surgical intervention would be indicated. For a single-level C5-6 disc herniation, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the procedure of choice. I would use a left-sided Smith-Robinson approach to protect the recurrent laryngeal nerve. After discectomy and decompression of the C6 foramen, I would place an interbody cage with bone graft and an anterior plate. Postoperatively, early mobilization in a soft collar for comfort, with expected resolution of arm pain within days to weeks.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Clinical-radiological correlation essential
Conservative trial for radiculopathy
ACDF is standard for single-level disc herniation
Left-sided approach for RLN protection
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to surgery without conservative trial
✗Wrong approach side without justification
✗Not correlating clinical findings with imaging
✗Forgetting to discuss natural history
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if he developed myelopathy?"
"What are the complications of ACDF?"
"Would you consider disc replacement?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Myelopathy

EXAMINER

"A 62-year-old woman presents with difficulty writing and buttoning clothes, unsteady gait, and electric shocks down her spine when she flexes her neck. Examination shows hyperreflexia and Hoffmann sign bilaterally. MRI shows multilevel stenosis C4-C7 with cord compression and T2 signal change in the cord at C5-6."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a classic presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The hand dysfunction, gait disturbance, Lhermitte phenomenon, and upper motor neuron signs are all consistent with cord compression. The MRI confirms multilevel stenosis with cord compression, and importantly, there is T2 signal change indicating myelomalacia which is a poor prognostic sign. This patient needs surgical intervention and should not be delayed for conservative treatment - myelopathy can progress and improvements after surgery are less likely with longer duration. For surgical approach with multilevel disease from C4-C7, I have options. ACDF at three levels could be performed but has higher pseudarthrosis risk. Alternatively, C5 and C6 corpectomy with fusion is an option. Given the multilevel nature and preserved lordosis, a posterior approach with laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion could also be considered, which provides indirect decompression. If she has significant kyphosis, an anterior approach may be preferable. Given the T2 signal change, I would counsel that while surgery should stabilize the condition and may allow some improvement, she may not fully recover and some deficits may be permanent.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Myelopathy should not wait for conservative treatment
T2 cord signal change is poor prognostic sign
Multiple surgical approaches possible
Realistic expectations about recovery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying surgery for conservative trial
✗Not recognizing myelopathy signs
✗Not discussing prognosis with cord signal change
✗One-size-fits-all surgical approach
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the pros and cons of anterior vs posterior approach?"
"What is the expected prognosis with cord signal change?"
"When would you choose laminoplasty over laminectomy?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Postoperative Complication

EXAMINER

"You are called to see a patient 6 hours after ACDF who is developing stridor and has increasing neck swelling. The patient is becoming increasingly distressed."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an airway emergency requiring immediate action. The most likely diagnosis is a postoperative hematoma causing airway compromise. This is a life-threatening situation. I would call for immediate help including anesthesia, have the crash trolley brought to bedside, and prepare for emergency airway management. My immediate action would be to open the wound at the bedside to evacuate the hematoma and relieve pressure on the airway. This is done by removing skin sutures/staples and opening the platysma. This may buy time before the airway is completely obstructed. Simultaneously, anesthesia should attempt to secure the airway if possible, but intubation may be extremely difficult due to swelling and distortion. If intubation fails and airway obstruction persists, emergency surgical airway (cricothyroidotomy or tracheostomy) may be required. Once the airway is secure and hematoma evacuated, the patient needs to return to the operating room for exploration, hemostasis, washout, and formal closure. I would investigate the cause - typically small vessel bleeding or coagulopathy.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize as airway emergency
Open wound at bedside to decompress
Difficult airway - anesthesia support essential
Return to OR after stabilization
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delayed recognition of emergency
✗Waiting for imaging instead of acting
✗Not opening the wound at bedside
✗Not calling for appropriate help
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you prevent this complication?"
"When do most hematomas present?"
"What is your drain policy?"

MCQ Practice Points

Approach Side

Q: Which side is preferred for the anterior cervical approach and why?

A: Left side is preferred. The recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) on the left loops around the aortic arch, giving it a longer and more protected course, while the right RLN loops around the subclavian artery, making it shorter and more vulnerable to injury during retraction.

Disc-Root Relationship

Q: A C5-6 disc herniation will compress which nerve root?

A: C6 nerve root. In the cervical spine, the nerve root exits ABOVE the pedicle of the same-numbered vertebra, so the C5-6 disc affects the C6 root. This is opposite to the lumbar spine pattern.

Myelopathy Timing

Q: What is the recommended timing for surgical intervention in cervical myelopathy?

A: Early surgery is recommended - do not delay for conservative treatment. Evidence shows better outcomes when surgery is performed within 6 months of symptom onset. Myelopathy with progressive symptoms is urgent.

Complication Rates

Q: What is the rate of dysphagia after ACDF?

A: 50% transient dysphagia (usually resolves within weeks), with 2-5% persistent dysphagia. Dysphagia is the most common complication of ACDF.

Adjacent Segment Disease

Q: What is the annual rate of adjacent segment disease after cervical fusion?

A: 2.5-4% per year. This is similar to lumbar spine fusion. Total disc replacement may reduce this rate but evidence is limited.

Airway Emergency

Q: What is the immediate management of suspected postoperative hematoma with airway compromise?

A: Open the wound at the bedside to evacuate hematoma and relieve pressure on the airway. This should be done before or while attempting intubation, as intubation may be extremely difficult due to swelling.

Australian Context

ACDF is commonly performed across Australia in both public and private hospital settings. Surgical volume and experience correlate with outcomes, with high-volume spine centers typically concentrated in metropolitan areas.

Wait times for elective cervical spine surgery in public hospitals vary by state and urgency category. Myelopathy with progressive symptoms should be expedited through urgent pathways. Private health insurance generally provides faster access to elective procedures.

The Australian Spine Registry collects data on cervical spine procedures when participating, providing valuable national outcomes data. Surgeon training and credentialing follows established pathways through AOA and relevant spine society training programs.

Exam Cheat Sheet

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Numbers

  • •C5-6 most common level (55-65%)
  • •Fusion rate: 95% single, 85% multilevel
  • •Dysphagia: 50% transient, 2-5% persistent
  • •Adjacent segment disease: 2.5-4%/year

Approach Anatomy

  • •Left side preferred (RLN protection)
  • •Carotid sheath retracted laterally
  • •Trachea/esophagus retracted medially
  • •Longus colli protects vertebral artery

Nerve Root Levels

  • •C5-6 disc = C6 root compression
  • •C6-7 disc = C7 root compression
  • •Root exits ABOVE pedicle of same number
  • •Different from lumbar spine pattern

Complications

  • •Dysphagia (most common)
  • •Hematoma (airway emergency)
  • •RLN injury (hoarseness)
  • •Pseudarthrosis (especially multilevel)

Exam Traps

  • •Not knowing left vs right approach rationale
  • •Wrong nerve root level correlation
  • •Delaying surgery for myelopathy
  • •Not recognizing hematoma emergency
Quick Stats
Reading Time93 min
Related Topics

Adjacent Segment Disease

Adult Spinal Deformity

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Cauda Equina Syndrome